Planet 9 is a planet a few times further away than the edge of the kuiper belt at that constellation that I said before. Its also a frozen world bit with rings and its bigger than Mars, smaller than Earth, but it has less mass than Mars because it has a lot of water ice
There are 2 possibilities, the first is Ninbiru which has a roughly 3600-year orbit, or the Red Dwarf/ BrownDwarf second star of our binary solar system called Nemesis which the Egyptians wrote about.
I still think that these anomalies are caused by the black hole that was created from the sun's progenitor. This would make out literally the mother of all that we know as all heavy elements would have been created by it
@flowersflix we know that our sun is a third generation star basically from the type and quantity of heavy elements that can only be produced in a supernova event. Simply put our bodies itself are proof as we could not exist without elements from a supernova. Combine that with the fact that we are relatively isolated from the majority of activity in our solar system and it suggests that we were formed from a local supernova. Now most people think of black holes as these terrifying objects that suck everything in, but that's not the way gravity works. Black holes are small and because of the 1 quarter law that states every time you double the distance from a black hole it's gravitational influence is quartered. This means it's pull diminishes quickly enough that if it was lurking in the kuiper cliff we would see anomalies on the outer part of our solar system but never see the cause of it.
It has a chance of existing if standard physics are used. But, If you use MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics) it does not as movements are accounted for. MOND also explains the existence of those too old galaxies see by Webb. I am not a physicist, but that's how I understand it. I could be wrong. Einstein I'm not., just an amateur.
ruclips.net/video/0JdYbw5gbog/видео.html This is a better explanation of why no Planet 9. A flyby early in the formation of the solar system pulled the planets around.
Neptune was mathematically predicted before it was discovered, so this is possible. Would be cool.
For sure. Hopefully we'll eventually get a confirmation of some kind one way or another.
Want to find planet 9? Search in the northern hemisphere at an inclination of 29 degrees, up and a bit to the left compared to Uranus. Very faint
What thé … #€(k !?
Are you medium or some sort of fortune teller ?
Constellation Perseus to be exact
Planet 9 is a planet a few times further away than the edge of the kuiper belt at that constellation that I said before. Its also a frozen world bit with rings and its bigger than Mars, smaller than Earth, but it has less mass than Mars because it has a lot of water ice
Love the random topic. Didn’t know anything within our galaxy was not seeing with a commercial telescope. Sounds like a movie plot forsure
So Nibiru might be real?
@@sublimehypocrisy Maybe. Possibly. My hypothesis is that a Sasquatch civilization inhabits Nibiru if it is, in fact, out there somewhere.
Hahaha beat me to it. Was going to say something about the Annunaki.
@@flowersflixhahaha the Annunaki are really just a Chewbacca like species 😂
@ 😅
There are 2 possibilities, the first is Ninbiru which has a roughly 3600-year orbit, or the Red Dwarf/ BrownDwarf second star of our binary solar system called Nemesis which the Egyptians wrote about.
I need the same substance you consumed ! Looks great !
@@raphaelbouza8551 I am confused???
He means that he wants to be high
I still think that these anomalies are caused by the black hole that was created from the sun's progenitor. This would make out literally the mother of all that we know as all heavy elements would have been created by it
Now I need to know more about this. Is the theory that a black hole of some type is what kicked off the formation of our solar system?
@flowersflix we know that our sun is a third generation star basically from the type and quantity of heavy elements that can only be produced in a supernova event. Simply put our bodies itself are proof as we could not exist without elements from a supernova. Combine that with the fact that we are relatively isolated from the majority of activity in our solar system and it suggests that we were formed from a local supernova. Now most people think of black holes as these terrifying objects that suck everything in, but that's not the way gravity works. Black holes are small and because of the 1 quarter law that states every time you double the distance from a black hole it's gravitational influence is quartered. This means it's pull diminishes quickly enough that if it was lurking in the kuiper cliff we would see anomalies on the outer part of our solar system but never see the cause of it.
It has a chance of existing if standard physics are used. But, If you use MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics) it does not as movements are accounted for. MOND also explains the existence of those too old galaxies see by Webb. I am not a physicist, but that's how I understand it. I could be wrong. Einstein I'm not., just an amateur.
@@Diamonddogusa Same here. That’s interesting, though. I’ll have to read up on the MOND take on this.
ruclips.net/video/0JdYbw5gbog/видео.html This is a better explanation of why no Planet 9. A flyby early in the formation of the solar system pulled the planets around.
Thanks--I'm going to check this out.