Since the last one was Pluto, "Goofy". More seriously, since it's likely to be the gateway to the Inner Oort Clud, I'd name it "Arnemeta", the Cornish/Welsh ancient goddess whose name means "She who stands in front of the Grove."
how cool that so many events and technologies are coinciding - new telescopes, AI, new space exploration - pretty sure new discoveries are just around the corner.
“The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.”
I read the paper. A better name for Siraj's "Planet X" would be "Planet Nine Jr." since the two hypothetical planets (Planet Nine and Planet Nine Jr.) have similar orbital parameters, within two standard deviations of each other, with basically the same longitude of perihelion. Planet Nine Jr.'s mass is slightly smaller than Planet Nine, hence the "Jr.". The differences are probably due to slightly different stability criteria for TNOs, different survey selection biases and a slightly different statistical analysis method employed. The main takeaways are that observational bias cannot explain the orbital clustering of detached ETNOs, so the clustering is real, and that the methodology of Batygin and Brown has been independently verified by Siraj et al.
Can't wait for it to actually be found! It will really give a boost to building a faster space craft so that it doesn't take 100 years for a probe to get out there.
John. You do such an awesome job as an interviewer it blows my mind. Sometimes you need to direct, other times you let them explain. You’re amazing, AND what an amazing time to be alive and have this information be so easily available. Humanity owes ya one 👍
The discovery of this would be so cool. There would be a push for new propulsion systems from each space agency to see who would be the first to get a probe to do a flyby
@@oldetymebiker2405 For real. Personally I think we should honor the specific sector of “ancient astronaut theorists” who’ve been chaotically attempting to tie together ancient mythology and aliens to this outer “planet X”. They call it “Nibiru”. It’s a nice name for a planet and people have been calling it that for much longer than we’ve had actual data suggesting its existence. But people are generally spiteful and don’t like to give the wacky people any wins, even when they turn out to be right about stuff.
Veryyyyy fascinating conclusions, Amir! You guys keep up the great work. I hadn't heard Vera Rubin is getting pushed back to 2026 though, is that true?
From what I've heard, not going to say from where: "it will come from the direction of the sun, it will be blocked from view on earth because of the sun."
I'd imagine it would be possible to narrow down a location, since we know the positions of the ones that are affected by it. (If it exists and affects them, they must have some sort of resonance with it, etc. That would only happen if it were in certain parts of its orbit at this time.)
To find out what happens check the Return Viewer's Guide. By accident, by a total lucky fluke I saw what happens when I was a kid. When I say what I saw I am describing what is always seen by anyone who happens to look up at the right time. Everything that happens repeats in exact detail every time the speeding forward rolling massive ancient Object crosses down in front of the moon.
Or, a rouge jovian exoplanet came within 1 -300 AU of the Sun in the last 4 Billion years throwing orbits off the ecliptic of these distant bodies - like in another paper Anton Petrov reported on this week.
There was an astronomer on a Latin TV station in 1964. I believe talking about planet X and its orbit that comes very close to the son and the Earth. He had a map talking about these planets have three speeds and one of them is traveling. I believe he said a quarter of the like the speed of light and then the other one. It was like three speeds and I believe it's more than one planet. It's huge and everyone is going to see it. That's what he said. He had a map he can see and the guy would say that it will bring destruction. It will flip the Earth channel 4. WAPA I think it was from Peru. He also said that he predicted earthquakes in Chile and that he's well recognized in the European astronomy. I saw the map. He shows the orbit or the angle that it comes in
7 planets 10 moons when blue Kachina comes first not too bad every third pass red one comes first, pop go below that 12k years. Causes all Rev from red iron oxide debris tail why mag N racing to Siberia now. Final days site
Am I missing something here? If there was a large planet in the outer solar system wouldn’t that have already been found with instruments like the JWST or lesser?
@@WestOfEarth As stated in the video, based on the potential object being predicted to be close to or in the same plane as the main planets, it would be likely that it would be an object formed with the solar system, rather than a captured object from outside the solar system after the solar system was formed that could have been captured in any orientation. A black hole of such low mass would have to be a primordial black hole, created billions of years before the solar system, and thus would be a captured object, and would share the same low odds as the object being a captured planet. So it's unlikely to be a black hole based on the predicted orbital parameters.
That's above my paygrade, but how close to earth could be the infered orbit? There are some very ancient Sumerian stories about a planet passing by, close enough to cause havoc. Also some ideas about a repeating flyby every couple of thousand years.
So Batygin was (roughly) right in the end. Would I only watch other astronomical channels, I would be persuaded that he was "proven wrong" and that all can be explained by random interstellar encounters long ago. Nice that I also follow you: two studies of such high rigor converging so much seem very likely to be onto something.
The discovery of new celestial bodies in our solar system is becoming increasingly exciting due to technological advancements. A four to five Earth mass planet may be responsible for a significant signal detected in the Kuiper Belt.
Ancients mapped out the distant constellations for eons but weren’t aware of the outer planets. So right off the bat that should tell you distance isn’t the only factor. There are plenty of factors that could make it hard to spot, mainly to do with our sun.
The model replaces the theoretical mass of the kuiper belt with a zone of massless test particles. Could this zone, or Oort Cloud perhaps, also be interpreted as a horizon line of, i don't know, let's say, a gigantic black hole?
Remember the one rogue planet or brown dwarf that passed by a star, the one with a ring system like 200x wider than Saturn's? We initially thought it was orbiting the star it transited in-front of; but it was a rogue of some sort. I think that should be a good benchmark: Is Planet X actually an orbiting planet, or was it a transient Rogue (that may have had semi-stable orbit, but ultimately left solar system before stable one could form). IT COULD BE that a Planet X rogue may have 'orbited' the sun for 10s of millions of years, enough time to perturb the orbits of many TNOs (but not all of them, considering different resonances, and orbital periods)...BUT if its gone, and no longer in the solar system; that'd explain our lack of ability to spot it (or continued CURRENT influence over various TNOs).
I'm wondering if there are any models that explain this grouping of KBOs by other means than a planet: say, the result of a close encounter with a red dwarf in the past, or a rogue black hole?
There's one interesting hypothesis which suggests the combined mass of all KBOs can explain the eccentricities. Notice Amir said in his model these were treated as massless in his model.
There is a recent (open access) paper [Trajectory of the stellar flyby that shaped the outer Solar System] in Nature that suggest interstellar interactions. It’s quite interesting.
Does the proposed orbit interfere with the Oort cloud and if yes, does the orbital speed fit an Oort cloud visit/disturbance of 60-70 million years which would correspond to the relatively predictable asteroid collisions on earth every 60-70-million years?
There used to be skits at the end of episodes - with the opossum, the DeLorean, etc. When did that stop? I got out of the loop for a while but I'm back now.
love your work John and collabers! interesting video but i dont get why we can use JWST to see galaxies 13B+ years ago, but cant just observe possible whole planets in our own neighborhood solar system?? am sure theres a sound explanation i would love to know, cheers, G
i think that our mythical planet x is the gravitational influence of several smaller bodies. an example of this is saturns moons gravitationally pushing saturns ring particles around. so if pluto, humera, and other dwarf plants lined up they could push a larger object out of orbit making it appear that something huge had to have pushed it out of orbit.
How much precision do we need in our system's current stable planetary orbits before we can rewind the clock and "see" Planet X's ejection event? It would seem reasonable that Planet X's high perihelion was stabilized by being tugged on by a passing neighbor star - which is unlikely to be many lightyears distant now. How much precision is needed in neighbor star trajectories to sniff out which one did that and when?
It's odd that Nibiru hasn't been found if it is out there when it's so close relative to other stars and planets we've found around them. Though I guess we only find those planet because they pass in front of their star
I saw it shocked I researched ALOT. 8 0ct 2017 just my eyes a long, detailed look when a chembank failed. It was moving as debris pickup at its base, not rotating. Neon red, pink, orange, surface texture like brain ridges deep folds, not cratered. UK it was in the East sky. Why we tilt now strong mag pull mag N racing to Siberia. Look up elites all know.
At ~300 AU, a probe going as fast as Voyager 1 would take ~85 years to reach it from Earth. A lightyear is 63240 AU (~211 times further). Space is biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig.
If it has no internal heat source it would be far below -200°C. I think it would be around 20K. The equilibrium Temperature is proportional to the square root of the invers distance to the sun. T ~ sqrt(1/d)
Siraj et al. uses 2015 BP519 in their list of 51 ETNOs, however 2015 BP519 has a high i = 54° inclination which dynamically separates it from the rest as a highly-inclined ETNO predicted by the Planet Nine Hypothesis, Becker et al. (2018) and Batygin and Brown (2019). This ETNO is not an argument of perihelion clustered ETNO. It is a highly-inclined ETNO which are known to cluster orthogonally to all of the rest of the 20 clustered, detached ETNOs in the Princeton study, thus it should have be been excluded from their analysis. This shows that Siraj et al., while comparing their study to that of Batygin and Brown, haven't really understood all the predictions made by the Planet Nine Hypothesis.
This research is truly fascinating and opens up opportunities to explore the solar system that we could only dream of before. However, it seems that we still need to be cautious because the 3-sigma result isn't strong enough to definitively confirm the existence of Planet X. Could it be that we are seeing a hypothesis that is actually just a coincidence? #cosmicchroniclestv
Doesn’t this beg many questions? Why is there such a large object so far out there ? Why haven’t we been able to discover or detect it with more precision before? It doesn’t add up.
@@EventHorizonShow Funny, but what if its not a PLANET. Could be a small black hole, dead brown dwarf, or a space station from a type 1+ level civilization. Fun to think about.
@@jacobystonecypher791unlikely to be a captured object based on predicted orbital parameters, so that would rule out a primordial black hole, or space station from outside the solar system, and the predicted mass is too small to be a brown dwarf, as 4-5 Earth masses is far smaller than Jupiter and Jupiter going by memory would need to be something like 3,000 times as massive to be capable of hydrogen fusion, so, no, based on this the predicted object would be nothing fancy, just a common type of planet, but as stated in the video an interesting one that we see often in other star systems but not in our own, so it would be of some interest to have one closer to be able to study.
Im a former child prodigy classical guitarist and contemporary jazz musician and a former Military Flight Test computer scientist and i collaborated with NASA on advanced navigational technology. My question is for Amir. What is the ancient origin as in Sumerian evidence of a brown dwarf binary star to our Sun star known as Nemesis in mythology that most likely has its own planets and moons including the fabled Tiamat and Nebiru? In that the Gravitational field affecting the outer solar system ellipse is not just one planet but a system of a star and its own orbiting planets. Thus the confusion of stars of planet density and orbital variation creates the cluster variance in your model depending which side of the dwarf star the planets are at, at any given time thus pulling and deflecting different outer objects in a more spread out pattern? I think your model is too focused on one planet not one Binary system. Most stars are born as binary as we now know for black holes too. The Cosmos like nature has a way of maintaining a Golden Ratio.of 1.618 in that Nemesis is 61% the mass of our Sun.
I saw it UK 2017 a chembank failed just my eyes, it's Neon red, orange pink. Was moving as debris pickup at the base but not rotating. But it's surface texture is like deep folds brain ridges not cratered
If a planet is discovered, what would they name it ?
What would you name it?
@@EventHorizonShowThe Shepherd?
Since the last one was Pluto, "Goofy". More seriously, since it's likely to be the gateway to the Inner Oort Clud, I'd name it "Arnemeta", the Cornish/Welsh ancient goddess whose name means "She who stands in front of the Grove."
Bob
I think Nox (the Greek equivalent is Nyx) gives it a female name and uses x in the name to honor Planet X as its unofficial name.
Merry christmas, everyone
Merry Christmas Luis.
dammit Luis
how cool that so many events and technologies are coinciding - new telescopes, AI, new space exploration - pretty sure new discoveries are just around the corner.
“The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.”
@@nikob381that already happened when the Atom was split 😢
Except for that pesky Great Filter out there🤔
Merry Christmas, John. Hope you and ANNA are cozying up beside a fire.
Merry Christmas Josh!
My thoughts are with the opossum and the LeBaron.
I read the paper. A better name for Siraj's "Planet X" would be "Planet Nine Jr." since the two hypothetical planets (Planet Nine and Planet Nine Jr.) have similar orbital parameters, within two standard deviations of each other, with basically the same longitude of perihelion. Planet Nine Jr.'s mass is slightly smaller than Planet Nine, hence the "Jr.". The differences are probably due to slightly different stability criteria for TNOs, different survey selection biases and a slightly different statistical analysis method employed. The main takeaways are that observational bias cannot explain the orbital clustering of detached ETNOs, so the clustering is real, and that the methodology of Batygin and Brown has been independently verified by Siraj et al.
Can't wait for it to actually be found! It will really give a boost to building a faster space craft so that it doesn't take 100 years for a probe to get out there.
Wait a minute… Amir is an astrophysicist _and_ a concert pianist? If he adds a degree in neurosurgery, he will *be* Buckaroo Banzai!
You can check your anatomy all you want
@@nsrvtqc wtf does that even mean?
Check your anatomy.....what?
Technically he would only be theoretically Buckaroo Banzai 😉
Wherever you go, there you are
@@cajampa it's a movie quote, if I recall correctly.
John. You do such an awesome job as an interviewer it blows my mind. Sometimes you need to direct, other times you let them explain. You’re amazing, AND what an amazing time to be alive and have this information be so easily available. Humanity owes ya one 👍
yeah he is an absolute pro
This is certainly a nice holiday gift!
Happy Holidays!
Ah, interesting that someone has done an independent analysis. It's soon 9 years since Mike and Konstantin came out with their paper.
24:00 How cool would it be if there were double planets, each about 2 Earth Masses, out in the outer reaches of our solar system?
Merry Christmas JMG, thanks for all the content and interviews!
Adding to the fun, if there's a planet X it very likely will have moons.
7 planets, 10 moons - Sam hoffman
Narrowing it down to a more precise location, incredible.
Getting closer and closer.
@@JohnMichaelGodier that's what she said
NIBIRU!
Ask your doctor if Zalmoxis is right for you.
Sumerian people.
@@krishead2410 🎯
The discovery of this would be so cool.
There would be a push for new propulsion systems from each space agency to see who would be the first to get a probe to do a flyby
Imagine how ridiculous Planet 9's new name will be. You know I'm right.
We should name it Pluto B
@@oldetymebiker2405 For real.
Personally I think we should honor the specific sector of “ancient astronaut theorists” who’ve been chaotically attempting to tie together ancient mythology and aliens to this outer “planet X”. They call it “Nibiru”. It’s a nice name for a planet and people have been calling it that for much longer than we’ve had actual data suggesting its existence. But people are generally spiteful and don’t like to give the wacky people any wins, even when they turn out to be right about stuff.
Thanks John salute from Toronto 🇨🇦
Veryyyyy fascinating conclusions, Amir! You guys keep up the great work.
I hadn't heard Vera Rubin is getting pushed back to 2026 though, is that true?
From what I've heard, not going to say from where: "it will come from the direction of the sun, it will be blocked from view on earth because of the sun."
Interesting. There’s definitely something big past the orbit of Pluto.
Your mom
@ how original kid
@John-c4r1o Somehow I knew there’d be a “yo mama” joke here.
@@israymervalentin-arias6313get rekt son
@@israymervalentin-arias6313original or not I still cracked a grin.
I'd imagine it would be possible to narrow down a location, since we know the positions of the ones that are affected by it. (If it exists and affects them, they must have some sort of resonance with it, etc. That would only happen if it were in certain parts of its orbit at this time.)
This narrows it down significantly.
So they have known and are telling us by slowly dripping this info out. Checks out.
Prev pops went below hence bunkers for the rich.
Thats not a moon thats a space station😂
To find out what happens check the Return Viewer's Guide. By accident, by a total lucky fluke I saw what happens when I was a kid. When I say what I saw I am describing what is always seen by anyone who happens to look up at the right time. Everything that happens repeats in exact detail every time the speeding forward rolling massive ancient Object crosses down in front of the moon.
I remember Konstantin Batygin talking about this almost 10 years ago now.
Or, a rouge jovian exoplanet came within 1 -300 AU of the Sun in the last 4 Billion years throwing orbits off the ecliptic of these distant bodies - like in another paper Anton Petrov reported on this week.
Hi JMG, could you please put the paper for us, viewers, to read it?
Pluto is dwarf so we just don't count it anymore? #plutocounts
A little late, but Merry Christmas!! :)
There was an astronomer on a Latin TV station in 1964. I believe talking about planet X and its orbit that comes very close to the son and the Earth. He had a map talking about these planets have three speeds and one of them is traveling. I believe he said a quarter of the like the speed of light and then the other one. It was like three speeds and I believe it's more than one planet. It's huge and everyone is going to see it. That's what he said. He had a map he can see and the guy would say that it will bring destruction. It will flip the Earth channel 4. WAPA I think it was from Peru. He also said that he predicted earthquakes in Chile and that he's well recognized in the European astronomy. I saw the map. He shows the orbit or the angle that it comes in
7 planets 10 moons when blue Kachina comes first not too bad every third pass red one comes first, pop go below that 12k years. Causes all Rev from red iron oxide debris tail why mag N racing to Siberia now. Final days site
Jupiter is 318 masses the earth , tell me how your 4.4 masses works because I have the images !
the jury is still out on this one. certainly interesting.
Am I missing something here? If there was a large planet in the outer solar system wouldn’t that have already been found with instruments like the JWST or lesser?
Yes you're missing something here
black hole sun, wont you come
Was hoping you'd ask about a small black hole being the object of interest. Fabulous interview nonetheless.
@@WestOfEarth As stated in the video, based on the potential object being predicted to be close to or in the same plane as the main planets, it would be likely that it would be an object formed with the solar system, rather than a captured object from outside the solar system after the solar system was formed that could have been captured in any orientation.
A black hole of such low mass would have to be a primordial black hole, created billions of years before the solar system, and thus would be a captured object, and would share the same low odds as the object being a captured planet.
So it's unlikely to be a black hole based on the predicted orbital parameters.
That's above my paygrade, but how close to earth could be the infered orbit? There are some very ancient Sumerian stories about a planet passing by, close enough to cause havoc. Also some ideas about a repeating flyby every couple of thousand years.
Final days site shows how n where they hiding inbound.
So Batygin was (roughly) right in the end. Would I only watch other astronomical channels, I would be persuaded that he was "proven wrong" and that all can be explained by random interstellar encounters long ago. Nice that I also follow you: two studies of such high rigor converging so much seem very likely to be onto something.
Read Enuma Elis Babylonian creation story but if you look at it scientifically, it’s almost like It’s describing the creation of our solar system
@baxtar1963 I feel like that story is everywhere and in everything now.
The discovery of new celestial bodies in our solar system is becoming increasingly exciting due to technological advancements. A four to five Earth mass planet may be responsible for a significant signal detected in the Kuiper Belt.
I saw 👀 Planet X and I dropped everything I was doing and made a bee line to the video!
How is it we see countless light years into the universe but can not find a giant planet in our solar system?
Ancients mapped out the distant constellations for eons but weren’t aware of the outer planets. So right off the bat that should tell you distance isn’t the only factor. There are plenty of factors that could make it hard to spot, mainly to do with our sun.
What a golden week of podcasts for fans of ET life, origins, universe and solar system.
What else have you been enjoying?
@EventHorizonShow rogan, lex, universe today(Fraiser Cain), and of course, yourself.
*also various other podcasts but they aren't very consistent.
The model replaces the theoretical mass of the kuiper belt with a zone of massless test particles. Could this zone, or Oort Cloud perhaps, also be interpreted as a horizon line of, i don't know, let's say, a gigantic black hole?
It wouldn’t be gigantic.
Remember the one rogue planet or brown dwarf that passed by a star, the one with a ring system like 200x wider than Saturn's?
We initially thought it was orbiting the star it transited in-front of; but it was a rogue of some sort.
I think that should be a good benchmark: Is Planet X actually an orbiting planet, or was it a transient Rogue (that may have had semi-stable orbit, but ultimately left solar system before stable one could form).
IT COULD BE that a Planet X rogue may have 'orbited' the sun for 10s of millions of years, enough time to perturb the orbits of many TNOs (but not all of them, considering different resonances, and orbital periods)...BUT if its gone, and no longer in the solar system; that'd explain our lack of ability to spot it (or continued CURRENT influence over various TNOs).
That’s a fascinating idea.. that it’s actually not even there anymore.
I'm wondering if there are any models that explain this grouping of KBOs by other means than a planet: say, the result of a close encounter with a red dwarf in the past, or a rogue black hole?
There's one interesting hypothesis which suggests the combined mass of all KBOs can explain the eccentricities. Notice Amir said in his model these were treated as massless in his model.
There is a recent (open access) paper [Trajectory of the stellar flyby that shaped the outer Solar System] in Nature that suggest interstellar interactions. It’s quite interesting.
Does the proposed orbit interfere with the Oort cloud and if yes, does the orbital speed fit an Oort cloud visit/disturbance of 60-70 million years which would correspond to the relatively predictable asteroid collisions on earth every 60-70-million years?
If you run your program on the google quantum chip making additional inquiries that would be interesting outcome.
Merry Christmas! Here's to another great year in science🥂
Always love Amir's appearances on the show! 🛰️
Merry Christmas!
There used to be skits at the end of episodes - with the opossum, the DeLorean, etc. When did that stop? I got out of the loop for a while but I'm back now.
If this planet discovered i would name it procul , it’s mean far away in latin
love your work John and collabers! interesting video but i dont get why we can use JWST to see galaxies 13B+ years ago, but cant just observe possible whole planets in our own neighborhood solar system?? am sure theres a sound explanation i would love to know, cheers, G
i think that our mythical planet x is the gravitational influence of several smaller bodies. an example of this is saturns moons gravitationally pushing saturns ring particles around. so if pluto, humera, and other dwarf plants lined up they could push a larger object out of orbit making it appear that something huge had to have pushed it out of orbit.
Think this could have been summed up in 10 minutes but I really enjoyed the 12 ads
How much precision do we need in our system's current stable planetary orbits before we can rewind the clock and "see" Planet X's ejection event? It would seem reasonable that Planet X's high perihelion was stabilized by being tugged on by a passing neighbor star - which is unlikely to be many lightyears distant now. How much precision is needed in neighbor star trajectories to sniff out which one did that and when?
Great video and information ! ❤
Either way, merry planet-X-Mas 😂👍🌠
It's odd that Nibiru hasn't been found if it is out there when it's so close relative to other stars and planets we've found around them. Though I guess we only find those planet because they pass in front of their star
Awesome video John thank you
An event horizon discord would be cool.
Niburu is said to have a relish hue when seen from a distance. But larger than the earth.
I saw it shocked I researched ALOT. 8 0ct 2017 just my eyes a long, detailed look when a chembank failed. It was moving as debris pickup at its base, not rotating. Neon red, pink, orange, surface texture like brain ridges deep folds, not cratered. UK it was in the East sky. Why we tilt now strong mag pull mag N racing to Siberia. Look up elites all know.
CNN endorsed him, so it must be true.
I just want to marry an astronomer. They would come home and tell me about their discoveries being all super excited, and that would be everything.
And I'd like to marry a goofy girl that's not a dummy.
At ~300 AU, a probe going as fast as Voyager 1 would take ~85 years to reach it from Earth. A lightyear is 63240 AU (~211 times further).
Space is biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig.
Happy days to all, wish i had all my family gathered from Kentucky, Texas and California.
It’s the mother ship.
That’s what ancient astronaut theorists say ❤
My first thought on seeing it 2017. Archon
I think it cool that planet 9 is called planet X, or ten😅
I may be ignorant, but wouldn't it be Planet IX, since Pluto isn't a planet anymore?
with any luck, when whoever finds the new planet they will keep it quiet until pluto gets its rank of planet back again
Appreciate ya. Thanks for sharing.
Interesting explanation/ hypothesis
Interesting, very interesting indeed.
I hope it’s not the Traveler.
Tng?
What would the surface temp be on such a planet?
If it has no internal heat source it would be far below -200°C. I think it would be around 20K. The equilibrium Temperature is proportional to the square root of the invers distance to the sun. T ~ sqrt(1/d)
Nice
So nice
Nice, nice, very nice
Planet Nemesis 😂
HAPPY CHRISTMAS J.M.G AND HAVE A WONDERFUL NEW YEAR AND KEEP HIDING THOSE LITTLE GREEN MEN . PEACE AND LOVE TO EVERYONE ❤❤,
Alright, alright, alright!
We must get started on Plan 9.
Or maybe it's a type 2 civilization space station? That would explain where all those UFOs come from. Nice video and thanks for all the fish!
Edited.Hi, just curious but does anyone know the average distance between *binary stars?
Adverts are a nightmare
Siraj et al. uses 2015 BP519 in their list of 51 ETNOs, however 2015 BP519 has a high i = 54° inclination which dynamically separates it from the rest as a highly-inclined ETNO predicted by the Planet Nine Hypothesis, Becker et al. (2018) and Batygin and Brown (2019). This ETNO is not an argument of perihelion clustered ETNO. It is a highly-inclined ETNO which are known to cluster orthogonally to all of the rest of the 20 clustered, detached ETNOs in the Princeton study, thus it should have be been excluded from their analysis. This shows that Siraj et al., while comparing their study to that of Batygin and Brown, haven't really understood all the predictions made by the Planet Nine Hypothesis.
merry xMas guys + platypus!
Why not look for objects not orbiting the sun at distance?
A colony should be out of the question, remember Port Joe Smith
Several levels above my pay grade.
Planet X is the missing super-earth... hmmm, what if Theia was one of it's moons that was shed after Planet X was ejected in the early Solar System?
Can you do timescapes
Fenmarel is a guardian of the outcasts and those who dwell on the fringes of society. 😎🤘🇨🇦🤘
Consider a planet with a moon having a larger attraction and how could you factor in this.
If planet X was ejected a billion years ago would we even know?
(where solar wind follows the sun's magnetic fieldlines planets occur )
🍻 Cheers 👏
If there is another planet, lets name it "George" again.
NASA has a picture of nemesis and her planets. They look like a spiraling rusty mess with a trail like a comet.
NASA logo literally says satan
Why are you using a Robo-Bot voice for the narration?
{:o:O:}
@ansfridaeyowulfsdottir8095 its a defining part of the show
If this thing is sitting out there in the Oort Cloud or the Kuiper Belt, I would think that this Planet X would just be pummeled to hell.
Why? Space is BIG.
Each item is as far from the other as an absurd distance - like earth is from the sun
You think it’s a long way to the chemist. But that’s peanuts…
This research is truly fascinating and opens up opportunities to explore the solar system that we could only dream of before. However, it seems that we still need to be cautious because the 3-sigma result isn't strong enough to definitively confirm the existence of Planet X. Could it be that we are seeing a hypothesis that is actually just a coincidence? #cosmicchroniclestv
Doesn’t this beg many questions? Why is there such a large object so far out there ? Why haven’t we been able to discover or detect it with more precision before? It doesn’t add up.
Our position against the sun. It makes complete sense with how we rotate and evolve around the sun.
What if it’s not a plant?
Hopefully it's not a plant, it'd be awfully cold and have a hard time getting good sunlight.
@@EventHorizonShowlol
@@EventHorizonShow Funny, but what if its not a PLANET. Could be a small black hole, dead brown dwarf, or a space station from a type 1+ level civilization. Fun to think about.
@@jacobystonecypher791unlikely to be a captured object based on predicted orbital parameters, so that would rule out a primordial black hole, or space station from outside the solar system, and the predicted mass is too small to be a brown dwarf, as 4-5 Earth masses is far smaller than Jupiter and Jupiter going by memory would need to be something like 3,000 times as massive to be capable of hydrogen fusion, so, no, based on this the predicted object would be nothing fancy, just a common type of planet, but as stated in the video an interesting one that we see often in other star systems but not in our own, so it would be of some interest to have one closer to be able to study.
We have covered the other options for what it could be.
Im a former child prodigy classical guitarist and contemporary jazz musician and a former Military Flight Test computer scientist and i collaborated with NASA on advanced navigational technology. My question is for Amir. What is the ancient origin as in Sumerian evidence of a brown dwarf binary star to our Sun star known as Nemesis in mythology that most likely has its own planets and moons including the fabled Tiamat and Nebiru? In that the Gravitational field affecting the outer solar system ellipse is not just one planet but a system of a star and its own orbiting planets. Thus the confusion of stars of planet density and orbital variation creates the cluster variance in your model depending which side of the dwarf star the planets are at, at any given time thus pulling and deflecting different outer objects in a more spread out pattern? I think your model is too focused on one planet not one Binary system. Most stars are born as binary as we now know for black holes too. The Cosmos like nature has a way of maintaining a Golden Ratio.of 1.618 in that Nemesis is 61% the mass of our Sun.
I saw it UK 2017 a chembank failed just my eyes, it's Neon red, orange pink. Was moving as debris pickup at the base but not rotating. But it's surface texture is like deep folds brain ridges not cratered
I think the next planet should be called Homer. it just seems like it makes sense somehow.