I've come across two different theories, one that says that these correlated orbits are evidence for another planet, another that overlays the orbits of all known objects in the region and shows so much variation that there is no correlation. It could just be selection bias.
Yes. True. The Cal Tech team feel that they have ruled out the selection bias, but none of it matters too much. If it exists, the Vera Rubin Observatory coming online in just a few months' time will find it. Truly, if Rubin doesn't find it within a year, it likely doesn't exist.
Nope, this is a recent 4K video! Need proof? Look at a Mike Brown video from 10 years ago and you will see that he's a younger looking astronomer than the version in this video. I just searched through all the old Nova videos on Planet Nine and this video doesn't exist on the Nova site. This is a recent, original Curiosity Stream documentary and not a repackaged Nova episode. How would Curiosity Stream be able to make a 4K up-scaled video from an old 720 p video anyway? Well, duh! Come to think about it, why would PBS license Nova content to Curiosity Stream so that Curiosity Stream could complete with PBS's own content? Double Duh!
Q: "How many Pluto-like objects exist in our solar system?" A: (Perplexity AI): "The exact number of Pluto-like objects, or dwarf planets, in our solar system is unknown, but estimates suggest there could be hundreds or even thousands. Currently, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) officially recognizes five dwarf planets: Pluto, Eris, Ceres, Makemake, and Haumea124. Estimates for the number of potential dwarf planets vary: ----Up to 200 in the Kuiper Belt (the region beyond Neptune's orbit) ----Possibly over 10,000 in the region extending beyond the Kuiper Belt"
“A few years ago, no one could’ve imagined that there might be another large planet silently orbiting the sun” Um…yeah, there was a few people that said such a planet existed and people called us conspiracy theorists as usual. We said this and we were told we were crazy. Crazy like a fox baby.
Came here to say the same. There are worse videos out there where I'd never go back to the channel. This is bearable but really REALLY annoying. Someone should check their dB meter for the two channels. It sounds to me that the speaking is mixed below the soundtrack. (I'm listening on near-field monitors.)
Think of cycles (Cali eg) Younger Dryas as a hopping off point to set the count down and binary as opposed to Just the Sun.....What was before Voyager...and, if so, where's the data? This COULD be THE SMOKING GUN the reason our civilization seems to suffer from amnesia - this could be really bad.
In India philosohpy, they have juga cycle, that assume that solar system is in cycle with something else and indeed on elliptical orbit. Creazy, I guess we need to wait for science to evolve and see if that is story only ;)
New Discory? The Summarians told you as well as other Aincient Civilizations that there was a planet much larger than Earth in the solar system, the Gods told them this and they wrote about it.
@@mrbaab5932 That bullshit rule about not clearing its' orbit would mean for example that Jupiter isn't planet because of the Trojan asteroids 60 degrees ahead of Jupiter. Being a double-planetoid doesn't preclude it from being a planet.
@@mrbaab5932 I understand just why Pluto got demoted. Even before Senda was discovered we had a lot more "planets" in the solar system than just the classic nine. Try and tell me that Titan, or Ganymede, or Callisto, or Europa, or Io, or Triton aren't "planets" whether they orbit a gas or ice giant. What happens when we discover an exomoon that just happens to orbit a gas giant and is larger than Earth. Do we finally suck it up and admit the truth. PS New Horizons showed Pluto to be more than a dead ice ball.
I have seen several videos on this sibject but this one seems to do the best job of telling why the orbits if kuiper belt objects pointed to a large planet. Unfortunately, there wasn't any new information. They seem to point to new telescopes adding to the search but don't name any.
This is a really odd thing. With all the various telescopes searching the universe in so many ways, we still dont know if there is one unknownst to us. If there is one maybe there is another !?
This video says that "a few years ago" no one could have even imagined Planet X (10) and with the demise of Pluto, Planet 9. Has anyone seen the 1965 book "Planet X" by Tony Simon. I had this book, way back when I was young.
Planet nine is real, but there's still people out there, denying it and people who know and even people that suspected it have been saying it for a long, long time.
Of course there are more planets in the Solar System. Unfortunately most of them are likely dwarf planets similiar to known KBOs. I wonder if the KBOs we are seeing in these long elliptical orbits were ones that were perturbed by the close approach of another star. Or stars. And what lies between the Kueiper Belt and the Oort Cloud.
Would require a star in the right place and to be looking closely at exactly the right place at the right time. Ie, we'd need to know exactly where to look first.
Nobody considered that this planet could be an orphan planet taken by sun and altered orbits of distant planetoids? If it is that way, finding it would be even more difficult task.
Wouldn't JWST have an easier time finding such an object? If we have a general prediction of its location, even at that distance a super-earth should still be fairly bright in the infrared due to leftover internal heat. Most solar systems we've discovered tend to have a handful of gas giants and super-Earths in rather tight orbits to the star, it would certainly help explain why we have no apparent super-Earths and why the gas giants are so far out, if they had a near collision interaction that ejected all of the larger planets from from the inner orbits. Who knows, maybe our first 4 planets are bits and pieces of this hypothetical planet that got ripped away due to tidal forces causing a partial breakup if the interaction was close enough.
I have a theory that Planet X is the reason for periodic ice ages on our planet. If Planet X has an elliptical orbit that last hundreds of thousands of years, and when it gets closer to the sun, it has an effect that causes an ice age.
It's not a theory, it's a conjecture and even then you should propose a mechanism of action i.e. how exactly does it cause ice ages? From what we already know an ice age can happen after a big enough asteroid hits the surface kicking so much dust into the air that ot then changes planet's albedo and hence surface temperature. Last ice age happened that way.
It would have been great if they explained how they ruled out a rogue plant or small black hole passing through the system billions of years ago could have disturbed some of the planets or proto-planets like Sedna and Biden.
Questioner: Is there a planet behind our sun, opposite to us in orbit, that we do not know about? _Ra: I am Ra. There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density._ Ra Material
They could find a new rock that barrels through and corrupting everything in it's path, that thinks it's the center of everything and call it Captain KFC 🍗
We are finding planets around suns thousands of lightyears away. With all of the telescopes on earth and in orbit, do you REALLY think a planet here could escape notice?
I wonder if instead of a planet if it could be a tiny black hole equal to 5-10 earth masses. Pure speculation on my part; I’m not sure if such a relatively small mass could maintain a black hole, or how small such a body with black hole density would be-perhaps mere meters across? It would certainly be nearly invisible.
I think there are more planets ( planetary bodies ) out there anywhere from 2 to several dozen. But they are not insteresting to us because all their orbits are beyond the one of Pluto, just too far away to be of any use.
I would think it a good idea to study the research of other people before embarking on such an endeavor. Although doing so might leave some people with very little to do.
There’s a 2 in 1000 chance that it’s randomly occurring… or as a real scientist would say… 1 in 500. When experts in a mathematics heavy field can’t simplify fractions I loose confidence in their abilities in said field.
I thought pluto has been reinstated as a planet, and so they're saying that neptune is the farthest planet. Why does every video think they have to have music? And if you're gonna have music, make it be something that you can't hear very much and not big explosions of sound deep during the video, just stupid.
Why don’t they just point the James Webb telescope in the general direction of the gravity disturbance, and why are we looking at a video made in the 90s
Better start getting ready for the appearance of the dragon in Rev.12:3. And then the super falling star event when it finally comes through our solar neighborhood. And that will just be the beginning of ten times worse stuff.
That's correct. Just watch a video Mo day on the History and Future of the Solar Systems. The Fifth Gas Planet formed 9.4 AU between Saturn and Uranus One note in the video at 46 seconds says a number of Earth size planets formed among the ice Giants causing collisions with Uranus. My theory is that almost all planets formed in the Ice belt 4 or 5 AU out in the disk and over time disk torque and Jupiter moved earth, Venus and Mars into the area of 1 AU
If other systems are anything to go by, what our solar system is missing is a "super earth". Mercury is interesting too .... is it the core remnant of something bigger?
@@TheHoveHeretic I think super Earth's occur when gas giants aren't present. A video I watched last week showed that asteroids in near circular orbits can't move into the inner solar system without passing through a "keyhole" around the vicinity of Jupiter. When that happens the get either accelerated out of the solar system or launched in the inner planets. The simulation is amazing! So I think Jupiter's happen most often but they normally migrate in the star unless a 2nd gas giant forms nearby to pull it back out as what happened to Jupiter. Without a Jupiter super Earth's can form.
I admit having not watched this, only because I've seen several, and they have always been inconclusive. For me I would have to ask if there was, why have Transits not been seen, surely any planet orbiting the sun would have been spotted obscuring light from many of the billions of stars in the galaxy. Or maybe it's too small to be detected.
You don't understand the vastness of space, do you? The new telescope cannot show you things by itself. You need to know where the planet is and then turn the telescope towards it. Also, they don't have the use of the telescope 24/7. There are lots of other research groups, researching other things. So you get your turn at the telescope..maybe a few hours a day or week.
Planet X means planet 10. Roman numeral 10 is X. but with Pluto being de-planeted this new planet would be Planet IX which is not as cool as Planet X. Also Elon Musk likes the name.
This is just a thought bubble from a largely ignorant science and cosmology fan..But is it possible for a planet to follow precisely the orbit of another planet for example the earth 180° apart on the elliptical... forever obscured by the sun and therefore visually unobservable and remain undetected. Just a thought...can someone enlighten me?
No enlightenment required, thats a known theory and hard to disprove. The only problem is that it wouldn't explain the unusual orbits observed of some objects out past Neptune which is the main reason some people think its out there.
@australien6611 thank you for the explanation...another thought...would it not be possible to leave a lingering satellite in the earth's orbit and simply wait..after 365.25 days and it's still there we'd know for certain surely one way or another. 😁
@robindawtrey9735 nice idea and i think the soho satellite kinda does that and proves no planet hiding behind the sun. But for the planet X if its not on the same elliptical plane and alot further out then the paths would never cross
@@australien6611 yes...I gathered that and wasn't really expecting that this was the solution...it was as I said...a thought bubble... Wouldn't it make for a great SF storyline though. Another earthlike planet completely oblivious to each other until....or because the other was more advanced and explains UFO's etc. etc. 😁
Technology is advancing so quickly, and I hope one day we will find this planet. But I still wonder, if Planet 9 really exists, why haven't we been able to find it after so many decades of observation? Are we missing something? #cosmicchroniclestv
My 2nd favorite narrator, yes! Sucks I cannot find out other documentaries she has done. I know she does "How world war 3 would start" or something to that effect.
I've come across two different theories, one that says that these correlated orbits are evidence for another planet, another that overlays the orbits of all known objects in the region and shows so much variation that there is no correlation. It could just be selection bias.
Yes. True. The Cal Tech team feel that they have ruled out the selection bias, but none of it matters too much. If it exists, the Vera Rubin Observatory coming online in just a few months' time will find it. Truly, if Rubin doesn't find it within a year, it likely doesn't exist.
The nerds in sumer 6,000 years ago were right.
I love this narrator. I wish I had hours of content with her to sleep to. It's what I do- it's not an insult to her!
Wish I could hear her better. Music so loud.
7.1 surround sound.
Why would it be insult? Its a compliment.
She’s an AI voice
This is a brilliant video. Makes understanding the difficulty of finding planet 9 easy. Thank you, and it's so interesting
This is an old Nova episode from about 10 years ago.
RIght!! It would be interesting with an update.
Nope, this is a recent 4K video! Need proof? Look at a Mike Brown video from 10 years ago and you will see that he's a younger looking astronomer than the version in this video. I just searched through all the old Nova videos on Planet Nine and this video doesn't exist on the Nova site. This is a recent, original Curiosity Stream documentary and not a repackaged Nova episode. How would Curiosity Stream be able to make a 4K up-scaled video from an old 720 p video anyway? Well, duh! Come to think about it, why would PBS license Nova content to Curiosity Stream so that Curiosity Stream could complete with PBS's own content? Double Duh!
Let's concentrate on Planet 3.
@@IouiS82 That would be why we should explore Planet 3's environment, i.e., space being one of them.
And there's been no news about the status of Uranus. We all know things are constantly changing with Uranus, daily even
Q: "How many Pluto-like objects exist in our solar system?"
A: (Perplexity AI): "The exact number of Pluto-like objects, or dwarf planets, in our solar system is unknown, but estimates suggest there could be hundreds or even thousands. Currently, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) officially recognizes five dwarf planets: Pluto, Eris, Ceres, Makemake, and Haumea124.
Estimates for the number of potential dwarf planets vary:
----Up to 200 in the Kuiper Belt (the region beyond Neptune's orbit)
----Possibly over 10,000 in the region extending beyond the Kuiper Belt"
THE SECRET IS OUT !!!! Love John !!!!
“A few years ago, no one could’ve imagined that there might be another large planet silently orbiting the sun” Um…yeah, there was a few people that said such a planet existed and people called us conspiracy theorists as usual. We said this and we were told we were crazy. Crazy like a fox baby.
Not really conspiracy but more like it can exist but harder to see
Conspiracy theory cos zero evidence.
No longer true
I have no doubt the space between systems is teaming with lost planets and all manner of rocks and debris
The 9th planet theory has been around for decades, if not centuries.
The background music in this video is too distracting.
And too loud compared to the narrator and other voices.
Didn’t notice it until I read this comment. Lol.
I disagree but I see the point
They're going to take the video down and reupload it without the music just for you
Came here to say the same. There are worse videos out there where I'd never go back to the channel. This is bearable but really REALLY annoying. Someone should check their dB meter for the two channels. It sounds to me that the speaking is mixed below the soundtrack. (I'm listening on near-field monitors.)
Wonder if these folks read "The 12th Planet" by Zacharia Sitchin.
If they hadn't, they should.
They probably aren't big fiction readers.
@@giovangciccareli1829
If they were it probably would be Arthur C Clarke, Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein or Joe Haldeman.
@@giovangciccareli1829 And yet, the Summarians spoke of this large plannet that we are still looking for.
Think of cycles (Cali eg) Younger Dryas as a hopping off point to set the count down and binary as opposed to Just the Sun.....What was before Voyager...and, if so, where's the data?
This COULD be THE SMOKING GUN the reason our civilization seems to suffer from amnesia - this could be really bad.
Maybe. It might be on a extremely elliptical orbit and is currently in it's farthest point.
If that was the case, it may actually be a capture planet.
In India philosohpy, they have juga cycle, that assume that solar system is in cycle with something else and indeed on elliptical orbit. Creazy, I guess we need to wait for science to evolve and see if that is story only ;)
Possibly so, current idea is jupiter ejected it during the grand tack.
why do they never say they are looking for what is in the stone record: Nibiru
New Discory? The Summarians told you as well as other Aincient Civilizations that there was a planet much larger than Earth in the solar system, the Gods told them this and they wrote about it.
Summarians? Ha ha...
@@mrliberty8468don’t laugh and google it. 🙄
@vickie5706 Summerians and the planet Nubrue.. A dead civilization and a dead religion. Find Jesus, he has more enlightenment.
@vickie5706 I did again and Ha ha.
Nibiru?
And the Annunaki.
Planet 9 (if it exists) is a needle in a solar-system-sized haystack.
It’s going to take some really clever (or really lucky) people to spot it.
I know how!!
Planet 9 exists, it's called Pluto, you are referring to Planet 10.
@@nicholasmaude6906 Tiny Pluto doesn't dominate its orbit 💫 and is a double planetoid.
@@mrbaab5932 That bullshit rule about not clearing its' orbit would mean for example that Jupiter isn't planet because of the Trojan asteroids 60 degrees ahead of Jupiter. Being a double-planetoid doesn't preclude it from being a planet.
@@mrbaab5932
I understand just why Pluto got demoted. Even before Senda was discovered we had a lot more "planets" in the solar system than just the classic nine. Try and tell me that Titan, or Ganymede, or Callisto, or Europa, or Io, or Triton aren't "planets" whether they orbit a gas or ice giant. What happens when we discover an exomoon that just happens to orbit a gas giant and is larger than Earth. Do we finally suck it up and admit the truth.
PS New Horizons showed Pluto to be more than a dead ice ball.
Pay close attention to 18:50 very close attention. He means it and I believe him.
From what I understand, most astronomers disagree with the conclusions in this video.
I have seen several videos on this sibject but this one seems to do the best job of telling why the orbits if kuiper belt objects pointed to a large planet. Unfortunately, there wasn't any new information. They seem to point to new telescopes adding to the search but don't name any.
This is a really odd thing. With all the various telescopes searching the universe in so many ways, we still dont know if there is one unknownst to us. If there is one maybe there is another !?
This video says that "a few years ago" no one could have even imagined Planet X (10) and with the demise of Pluto, Planet 9. Has anyone seen the 1965 book "Planet X" by Tony Simon. I had this book, way back when I was young.
Planet nine is real, but there's still people out there, denying it and people who know and even people that suspected it have been saying it for a long, long time.
just look for it
Evidence??
Nibiru.
Not Planet 9! That's Pluto!😊 This is No. 10!😮 The Solar System doesn't reconfigure because some malcontents throw a tantrum at a Convention.
QUITE!
If Pluto is a full planet then we have thousands of planets here
Just ignoring Ceres then…
Ιf there was anything unknown yet and large enough to be defined as a planet in our Solar system, we would have discovered it by now.
Solarballs has a good arc about this.
Also I think Erebos is a good name. Toman deity or personification of darkness.
Of course there are more planets in the Solar System. Unfortunately most of them are likely dwarf planets similiar to known KBOs. I wonder if the KBOs we are seeing in these long elliptical orbits were ones that were perturbed by the close approach of another star. Or stars. And what lies between the Kueiper Belt and the Oort Cloud.
What about gravitational lensing as an indicator?
Would require a star in the right place and to be looking closely at exactly the right place at the right time. Ie, we'd need to know exactly where to look first.
Nobody considered that this planet could be an orphan planet taken by sun and altered orbits of distant planetoids? If it is that way, finding it would be even more difficult task.
Planet Biden, he is wayyyyyy out there! Now it makes sense.
Think about it...
Planet X is Santas' workshop. It has to be. North pole ain't big enough to make and store all those toys.
1:10 - There's already a Planet Nine, it's called Pluto.
Odd ... the first KBO discovered was called Pluto. Any relation?
@@TheHoveHeretic Pluto was discovered long before the Kuiper belt, Sedna I do believe was the first KBO discovered.
@@nicholasmaude6906sorry but Pluto is not planet 9
@@DarthVader20201 No it is Planet 9.
Pluto isn’t a planet it’s a dwarf planet.
Wouldn't JWST have an easier time finding such an object? If we have a general prediction of its location, even at that distance a super-earth should still be fairly bright in the infrared due to leftover internal heat.
Most solar systems we've discovered tend to have a handful of gas giants and super-Earths in rather tight orbits to the star, it would certainly help explain why we have no apparent super-Earths and why the gas giants are so far out, if they had a near collision interaction that ejected all of the larger planets from from the inner orbits. Who knows, maybe our first 4 planets are bits and pieces of this hypothetical planet that got ripped away due to tidal forces causing a partial breakup if the interaction was close enough.
I have a theory that Planet X is the reason for periodic ice ages on our planet. If Planet X has an elliptical orbit that last hundreds of thousands of years, and when it gets closer to the sun, it has an effect that causes an ice age.
It's not a theory, it's a conjecture and even then you should propose a mechanism of action i.e. how exactly does it cause ice ages?
From what we already know an ice age can happen after a big enough asteroid hits the surface kicking so much dust into the air that ot then changes planet's albedo and hence surface temperature. Last ice age happened that way.
It would have been great if they explained how they ruled out a rogue plant or small black hole passing through the system billions of years ago could have disturbed some of the planets or proto-planets like Sedna and Biden.
It would be nice if Curiosity Stream made this video a bit easier to find on their own streaming service.
Sounds like a 24/7 AI driven Sky search & Historical reference photo analysis is called for ..
Who needs a space ship just colinize sedna.
Since the object if it exists hasn't cleared its orbit yet, then it doesn't classify as a planet.
THE SECRET HAS ARRIVED !!!! Love John !!!!
Questioner: Is there a planet behind our sun, opposite to us in orbit, that we do not know about?
_Ra: I am Ra. There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density._
Ra Material
Biden? What am apt name for an astronomical object that has no idea where it is; where it is going and that it is not the centre of the universe ...
They could find a new rock that barrels through and corrupting everything in it's path, that thinks it's the center of everything and call it Captain KFC 🍗
Maybe someday they'll find a big dumb orange rock in space to honor Trump with. 🍊
I wonder if they were able to discuss this with Martin Landau before he passed away?
Yeah, it's definitely outdated because they're saying that neptune is this furthest.
So, what about James Webb. It can see the birth of the universe, it should be able to see the hidden planet much more easily.
There's no practival point in finding P9 before the next budget appropriation.
It's just as possible that there is a 2nd Sun. Most of the Suns in our Galaxy are Binary systems. Sol, Our Sun is an anomaly.
All I've got to say is, if they do find it, they better name it 'Planet 9 from Outer Space'
We are finding planets around suns thousands of lightyears away. With all of the telescopes on earth and in orbit, do you REALLY think a planet here could escape notice?
Planets around other planets are mostly super-Jupiters and we mostly detect them by non-optical means.
@@vaakdemandante8772 "planets" around other planets are called moons.
I wonder if instead of a planet if it could be a tiny black hole equal to 5-10 earth masses. Pure speculation on my part; I’m not sure if such a relatively small mass could maintain a black hole, or how small such a body with black hole density would be-perhaps mere meters across? It would certainly be nearly invisible.
So this being said the time frame of this orbit would just about line up with the younger dryas would it not?
Planets that needed gold to restore its atmosphere. Planet Nibiru
I think there are more planets ( planetary bodies ) out there anywhere from 2 to several dozen. But they are not insteresting to us because all their orbits are beyond the one of Pluto, just too far away to be of any use.
Has anyone considered that it could be a planet ship..like from a type 3 or 4 civilization, that can wield planets at thier will?
They need to build a laser range finder the size of the Hubble.
A confirmed hit and aim your telescopes that direction.
Why not utilise the JWT to find it
Nemesis has a few planets orbiting it. One of them is nibiru.
If they saw Sedna, a small object. Why they can't see a bigger planet??? 😅😂
Could the Kiper Belt once had been an ancient planet that exploded millions of years ago & Pluto was it moon ?
I already claimed there is. We cannot see it because it is covered with liqid that is like water. But very heavy
Water has a about 3% reflection. It is way too cold for liquid water or anything like water 💦.
I would think it a good idea to study the research of other people before embarking on such an endeavor. Although doing so might leave some people with very little to do.
They caan calculate it's orbit and distance from us so they should send a camera probe out to it to take pics.
Its interestyng this video I like it
I VE SEEN 3 IN LAST 2 YEARS, GOT EM ONVIDEO
A perfect example of inconsequential information.
it should be planet IX, then.
There’s a 2 in 1000 chance that it’s randomly occurring… or as a real scientist would say… 1 in 500.
When experts in a mathematics heavy field can’t simplify fractions I loose confidence in their abilities in said field.
Cant we just point the JWST at where we calculate it to be?
how do you tell the diffence between a dark matter and a non feeding black hole
I thought pluto has been reinstated as a planet, and so they're saying that neptune is the farthest planet. Why does every video think they have to have music? And if you're gonna have music, make it be something that you can't hear very much and not big explosions of sound deep during the video, just stupid.
Why don’t they just point the James Webb telescope in the general direction of the gravity disturbance, and why are we looking at a video made in the 90s
Rather than something in our Solar system could it have been something very large, but it just came by, something like a small star.
Better start getting ready for the appearance of the dragon in Rev.12:3. And then the super falling star event when it finally comes through our solar neighborhood. And that will just be the beginning of ten times worse stuff.
Theres no hidden planet. This is just space urban legends
I once read that the very early solar system was very chaotic and that there might have been more than four gas giants, but one got ejected
That's correct. Just watch a video Mo day on the History and Future of the Solar Systems. The Fifth Gas Planet formed 9.4 AU between Saturn and Uranus
One note in the video at 46 seconds says a number of Earth size planets formed among the ice Giants causing collisions with Uranus.
My theory is that almost all planets formed in the Ice belt 4 or 5 AU out in the disk and over time disk torque and Jupiter moved earth, Venus and Mars into the area of 1 AU
If other systems are anything to go by, what our solar system is missing is a "super earth".
Mercury is interesting too .... is it the core remnant of something bigger?
@@TheHoveHeretic I think super Earth's occur when gas giants aren't present. A video I watched last week showed that asteroids in near circular orbits can't move into the inner solar system without passing through a "keyhole" around the vicinity of Jupiter. When that happens the get either accelerated out of the solar system or launched in the inner planets. The simulation is amazing!
So I think Jupiter's happen most often but they normally migrate in the star unless a 2nd gas giant forms nearby to pull it back out as what happened to Jupiter. Without a Jupiter super Earth's can form.
If so how could it elude detection until now.
If it's not a planet, we have to do some serious thinking.
Can we NOT get Voyager 1 or 2 to get to look for it ?
*Instead of looking for a 9th planet* ----------- maybe we should be looking for a small black hole ------------ *that is in orbit around the Sun*
It’s Nibiru and the Annunaki.
I admit having not watched this, only because I've seen several, and they have always been inconclusive. For me I would have to ask if there was, why have Transits not been seen, surely any planet orbiting the sun would have been spotted obscuring light from many of the billions of stars in the galaxy.
Or maybe it's too small to be detected.
Planet Ix, future home to a tech driven civilization.
Pluto: "What?!"
Resume @8:30
It’s probably an invisible tiny black hole
IF it exists IT isn't LOST. Just because we can't see it.
In 1986 I had a super realistic dream about a big planet covering our sky, way too close to the Earth and fire balls were coming from it
The emperor of Mongo, Ming the Merciless, tried that. The Decepticons also tried it, if I recall correctly, but that was in more recent years.
I thinking that Theia planet that hitting the earth most of it main part may piercing through the earth and hidding in the corner of our solar system
Could not the new telescope in space see this thing.
You don't understand the vastness of space, do you?
The new telescope cannot show you things by itself. You need to know where the planet is and then turn the telescope towards it.
Also, they don't have the use of the telescope 24/7. There are lots of other research groups, researching other things. So you get your turn at the telescope..maybe a few hours a day or week.
NO!!!!!!
Don't we have the James Webb telescope. If that can't see it, it's Not there.
Planet X means planet 10. Roman numeral 10 is X. but with Pluto being de-planeted this new planet would be Planet IX which is not as cool as Planet X.
Also Elon Musk likes the name.
This is just a thought bubble from a largely ignorant science and cosmology fan..But is it possible for a planet to follow precisely the orbit of another planet for example the earth 180° apart on the elliptical... forever obscured by the sun and therefore visually unobservable and remain undetected. Just a thought...can someone enlighten me?
No enlightenment required, thats a known theory and hard to disprove. The only problem is that it wouldn't explain the unusual orbits observed of some objects out past Neptune which is the main reason some people think its out there.
@australien6611 thank you for the explanation...another thought...would it not be possible to leave a lingering satellite in the earth's orbit and simply wait..after 365.25 days and it's still there we'd know for certain surely one way or another. 😁
@robindawtrey9735 nice idea and i think the soho satellite kinda does that and proves no planet hiding behind the sun. But for the planet X if its not on the same elliptical plane and alot further out then the paths would never cross
@robindawtrey9735 Fraser Cain has a great channel and is great at answering questions about space from people like us 👍
@@australien6611 yes...I gathered that and wasn't really expecting that this was the solution...it was as I said...a thought bubble... Wouldn't it make for a great SF storyline though. Another earthlike planet completely oblivious to each other until....or because the other was more advanced and explains UFO's etc. etc. 😁
NIBIRU from ancient Babylonian records that kept careful records of it?
Technology is advancing so quickly, and I hope one day we will find this planet. But I still wonder, if Planet 9 really exists, why haven't we been able to find it after so many decades of observation? Are we missing something? #cosmicchroniclestv
They are hiding the truth from us cause it destroys most life on Earth when it gets close enough
The easy explanation is aliens. It's always aliens.
👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐THANK YOU FOR THE ADEQUATE, THOUGHTFUL INFORMATION.
English: "no one could HAVE even imagined", not "could of".
Does it disappear
Name it Thoth or Hœnir.
Thoth? As in a person lisp trying to pronounce Thor?
@kesangwangchuk8282 no hes the Egyptian God of mystery.
My 2nd favorite narrator, yes! Sucks I cannot find out other documentaries she has done. I know she does "How world war 3 would start" or something to that effect.