Andrew Raycroft Reacts To Controversial No-Call In Bruins vs Panthers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 май 2024
- NESN Bruins Analyst Andrew Raycroft joins Gresh & Fauria to react to the controversial no-call of goalie interference that gave the Panthers the go ahead goal in game 4.
Don't forget to subscribe! / weeivideo
📡 LISTEN LIVE ➡️ www.audacy.com/weei/listen
📺WATCH LIVE ➡️ weei.com/watch
💻WATCH LIVE ON TWITCH ➡️ / bostonweei
Download the Audacy App today and stream your WEEI wherever you are! ➡️
go.audacy.com/y-listen-live-weei
FOLLOW US:
TWITTER - / weei
INSTAGRAM: / weeisports
FACEBOOK: / weei
Thumbnail images courtesy of Getty Images/USA Today Network. 
Спорт
It’s comical to hear Boston fans complain about dirty hits, especially involving MARCHAND! It’s called karma.
The Lightning had four goals 4 called back
Who cares…
The refs are fans of the Panthers the way they are officiating.
@@MikeStarr-lw5ol Oh god. Another brainless conspiracy theorist.
@@tb7-rf1fbthe league obviously wants Florida to win. Or it's the gambling companies. Or the refs are on the take. Bennett never went to the moon
@@MikeStarr-lw5ol Bruins find it difficult playing two teams each game….
Bruins issues....they can't get the puck out of the defensive zone to save their lives, the offense has been pathetic, and towards that end.....playing Maroon is a waste of a spot, Florida isn't taking the bait. Play the young kids on the fourth line!!! And finally the league offices are never going to give the B's a fair shake.
Bravo. Maroon doing the dog and pony show at the blue line in warmups isn't intimidating anyone. He's useless and he's not a Bruin. Get him out
Every playoff game has controversy due to bad officiating. All such plays should be decided by AI computer.
Comparing the Bennett punch on the rat to the OJ trial. Wow we have hit an all time low lmfao!
Did you listen to the conversation?? You obviously didn’t cause that’s not what he said. Smh. Listen again and try to use your comprehension skills.
@@deadphish9879 Florida people are not known for their intellect.
In fact, they're known for the opposite lol
@@deadphish9879 THANK YOU. People are so freaking stupid these days.
Not one single person has advanced a coherent defense of that call. Panthers fans certainly haven’t.
Rule 38.2 Subsection C followed by another subsection C
(c) Scoring Plays Involving Potential "Interference on the Goalkeeper" - Either: (i) A play that results in a "GOAL" call on the ice where the defending team claims that the goal should have been disallowed due to "Interference on the Goalkeeper" (as described in Rules 69.1, 69.3 and 69.4); or (ii) A play that results in a "NO GOAL" call on the ice despite the puck having entered the net, where the On-Ice Officials have determined that the attacking team was guilty of "Interference on the Goalkeeper" but where the attacking team claims: (A) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by an attacking Player with the goalkeeper; (B) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending Player which caused the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (C) the attacking Player's positioning within the goal crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernable impact on the play.
1) Swayman already had both his legs fully extended, not enough time for him to regroup and kick the puck out of the way and out of the net
2) Coyle was already in the crease and on Swayman’s stick side, so he also would not have been able to extend the blocker out to get that puck out of the way
And following 38.2 subsection C subsection (c), Swayman never had a chance to save the goal, that’s why it wasn’t called for Goaltender Interference… was it a cross check? Yes, but NHL in Toronto can not give out penalties, only see what was given, and what was given, was a missed penalty, but no goaltender interference
@@TrueMr.Quinn1 cross checking.
All of your babble is irrelevant as Coyle was crosschecked prior to the goal.
Your pathetic attempt to appear knowledgeable by spewing a lot of words with a copy-paste has failed, and I'm sure you're accustomed to failure if you're trying to justify this.
@@HarrisonOwnsno he's making the only argument that's viable. It's still wrong but viable. They missed the crosscheck, can't do anything about it. You can still say call the goal back, which should've been done
All of Boston media not talking about Marchand colliding with Stenlends head later on in the game
Wahhhh! Someone call the Whaaaaaaambulance! 🚑🤧
Check it again buddy he doesn’t hit his head
@@HighlyMotivated420 For what the Cats being up 3-1 in the series....
No media is talking about it. No videos on RUclips posting it.
Must be a giant conspiracy. Or maybe it wasn't a dirty headshot?
Not to mention pasta sucker punching Lundell in the head last game😂😂😂 Boston has the dumbest sports fans
Everyone had the tape silly.
Look up rule 69.7
Swayman deserves better than this sad team... what a waste of talent
The officials have been terrible the last couple of playoffs. I feel that hockey is one of the least corrupt sports, but hockey is getting up there. There are clear bias towards certain teams, and players know this. The flopping is getting ridiculous as well, the moment anyone feels anything, they drop to the ice. This goes beyond just the Bruins. Take a look at the Oils/Van series, terrible non calls/cheap shots, and when something is done about the fines/suspension aren’t tough enough in my opinion.
Been a Bruin fan for 57 years and NEVER seen so much whining about a bad call.
Refs have been making bad calls from the beginning of time. Get over it.
It's not as if we have a chance in hell of winning a cup with a team that barely got past
the freakin' Leafs ffs. Go BRUINS.
Yes people seem to think missed calls are getting worse😅😅. Every play is shot with 12 different angles now. In every game
Anyone that thinks intentionally ignored calls don't affect the game are brain damaged troglodytes.
rule 69.7
I don't understand why it's so difficult to understand the ruling. You can't call a penalty after the fact. It doesn't matter if it's at center ice or by the goalie. It was a Bruin that interfered, no matter if he was pushed there. The ref had to call a penalty on the play. You can't do that afterward. A penalty can be called if it was a Panther in the goalie area but not vice versa.
Can't call a penalty no. What some people fail to comprehend is that you can and in this case must disallow the goal for pushing dman into goalie. Duh
@@JayRiemenschneider I can't make it any simpler... if you don't get it then you don't. Bennett did not interfere with the goalie. He crosschecked a player, who happened to be near the goalie. The referee didn't call the crosscheck. That's not goaltender interference even if it resulted in goaltender interference. There either had to be a call on the ice by the referee for crosschecking or a Panther had to interfere. That's how it works.
@@jcg9998well you're wrong. If an offensive player pushes a defender into the goalie it's goaltender interference. Doesn't have to be a penalty and doesn't have to be on ice call, it's review able. Brush up and get back to me if you wish
@@JayRiemenschneider Yes, you do have to call a penalty on the ice. That's exactly why the NHL allowed it to stand. There doesn't have to be a penalty called if the penalty is goaltender interference. Bennett did not interfere with the goaltender. The confusion lies in the wording. It says that if a player pushes a player into the goalie it counts as interference and the goal can be disallowed. But in that scenario, a penalty would have had to have been called on the ice against Bennett for something other than goaltender interference.
@@jcg9998 you're not making sense man. You must realize at this point you're mistaken. If they couldn't disallow it on review I'd say fair enough. You can disallow and it doesn't have to be a penalty. Haha are you just being thick on purpose? I respect that.
The Marchand shot to the face was just Karma. Marchand has given cheap shots to players around the league his whole career.
florida does grimey chit to win plain and simple!
Bruins trash plain and simple!
Don Sweeney is dead on put the refs up there after every game. media just baits coaches into taking fines so why not throw the refs on the podium and let them explain themselves
Couldnt have been that bad if marchand continued to play on i believe he got hurt when he fell into the boards a dirty hit to a dirty player
Thankfully the refs gave us the chance to make up for our choke last year to return the favor to Florida now in our rebuild year
Game 5 plan
Non negotiable
Either Bennet answers the bell
in the first 5 min after puck drops
or the game gets ugly😎🇨🇦
Good teams overcome bad teams succumb!!!!!!!!
It’s hilarious to me all the issues everybody has with Bennett’s “sucker punch”, but when Pasta winds up and punches Lundell it’s a flop. Marchand played two periods after the Bennett hit and didn’t come out until he checked Stenlund’s chin with his forehead
People are only going to want to see what they want to see.
Boston fans: Clear as day cheap shot to face
Panthers fans: no it was clean
Facts: A dirty cheap shot
Anytime panthers fans have to defend Thier Dirty teams actions that are clear as day on video is just pathetic and dirty as they are!
Yea because Bennett has a butt end in his hand, that makes the punch way harder it’s like brass knuckles also lundell is a serial diver
Oh I'm sorry, did Pasta get a penalty for that or?
They literally got dominated in every single game including game 1 (beat a rusty Bobrovsky) and Raycroft is out here acting like these are two evenly matched teams and one of them got robbed of a fair shot. Bad call? Yes absolutely, but the panthers are rightly and justly up 3-1 in this series. The panthers have completely owned the bruins in expected goals, Corsi, or any other statistic that you want to throw out there. He only seems to remember Boston’s scoring chances though
You have no idea if they would have won game 4 if that goal is overturned, pure speculation on your part. And all those stats are just that, stats and they have no bearing on any of the games. The call goalie interference on that play and Bruins go on the PP instead of Florida, then anything can happen.
@@907Lifer with how both teams have been playing, you’re basically asking for a miracle for the bruins to win this series. Even with a hypothetical tied 2-2 series it would’ve taken a miracle to beat Florida 2 out of 3 games. They’ve been totally dominated. It’s goat tier level whining to act like this goalie interference missed call had any bearing on the outcome of this series. I know it, you know it, everyone knows it that the panthers were winning this series after how unbelievably mid the bruins looked vs the leafs. This series was over before it started. “Anything can happen” doesn’t mean the bruins realistically had a chance. You can say that about anything
Stop crying Boston, you have another game to play. Will you?
This series is like watching Canada vs. Switzerland. Bruins outshot and outchanced 2 to 1 or more every game..Only chance Bruins have is Swayman. Completely outclassed in every aspect of the game, except goaltending. Excuses are a loser's consolation. I think the review panel got it right- but I wish they got it wrong and called back the goal, because the Panthers were beating you anyway...forecasting Game 5 - shockingly, you get outshot and outchanced 2-1 AGAIN. Can you believe it??? But this time, more like Games 2 and 3, it is NOT close, and you lose by 3 or more. Once again, you will be unable to stop the Panthers from getting to the high danger areas with the puck, and they score 4+ goals .Bruins will score 1-2 goals , MAX. I'm not a fan of either team, but tired of Bruins fans pretending they are in the same playoff class as Florida.
Coyle went into the crease initially on his own ..brad tried to land a dirty late hit and got caught..
Rule 38.2 Subsection C followed by another subsection C
(c) Scoring Plays Involving Potential "Interference on the Goalkeeper" - Either: (i) A play that results in a "GOAL" call on the ice where the defending team claims that the goal should have been disallowed due to "Interference on the Goalkeeper" (as described in Rules 69.1, 69.3 and 69.4); or (ii) A play that results in a "NO GOAL" call on the ice despite the puck having entered the net, where the On-Ice Officials have determined that the attacking team was guilty of "Interference on the Goalkeeper" but where the attacking team claims: (A) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by an attacking Player with the goalkeeper; (B) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending Player which caused the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (C) the attacking Player's positioning within the goal crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernable impact on the play.
1) Swayman already had both his legs fully extended, not enough time for him to regroup and kick the puck out of the way and out of the net
2) Coyle was already in the crease and on Swayman’s stick side, so he also would not have been able to extend the blocker out to get that puck out of the way
And following 38.2 subsection C subsection (c), Swayman never had a chance to save the goal, that’s why it wasn’t called for Goaltender Interference… was it a cross check? Yes, but NHL in Toronto can not give out penalties, only see what was given, and what was given, was a missed penalty, but no goaltender interference
Maybe the bruins should’ve scored a single goal in the 2nd and 3rd
if boston played the puck instead of the man, maybe they'd stop humiliating themselves in front of the entire hockey world.
How is a team that has performed far better than expected this entire year "embarrassing themselves in front of the hockey world?" They weren't even supposed to be in the cup race this year. Let alone the second round.
Florida is playing with too many men on the ice all game! It’s 7 on 5.. figure that out
If your team doesn’t not take shots, you won’t win.
That was a hockey play u may be watching the wrong channel go check out the nba playoffs baby
Benny was just trying to protect himself as marchand was ready to give a high elbow im pretty sure its how marchand fell along the boards that he got injured. Bottom line the panthers are heads above better than the bruins and are just as dirty
It got reviewed and the refs didn't call a penalty so good goal
Love Benny
They can't call a penalty. That's not what's being debated here🙄
If Marchand didn't have a glass jaw there would not even be a discussion about the hit.
Well, you just made it clear that you are a casual.
@@BahamutBreaker Mark Messier is also a casual then I guess. Playoff Hockey. Bennet would have fit right in with Ken Hodges and Terry O'Reilly.
@@MikeAndrews-pl6dp Talking about Hodges and O’Reilly in 2024…. so, not just a casual, but an old-fart casual.
Yes, but not soft yet. @@BahamutBreaker
A crosscheck takes two hands, this was a one handed shove. EVERYONE does this in the goal crease and most of them are true vicious crosschecks and never called by refs.. If these goals were dictated by that one shove there would be no goals allowed. Hockey is dirty. Fact of life.
Boston stop crying and start playing and no it all ends tomorrow