Why the Beechcraft Bonanza is Excellent - The best Family Airplane?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • If you are looking for unmatched craftsmanship, this piston-engine powerhouse is designed and built to be certified in the rugged utility category. With first-class technology, comfort, and world-class quality, this plane is ready for any adventure you might want to embark on. Power comes from a 300hp Continental IO-550 engine, with 3 bladed propellers in front. This variant was introduced in 2006 and is the latest variant since 1947. The price starts at $777,000. Speaking of performance, the maximum climb rate is 1,230 ft/min, with a cruise speed of 196 knots and a 900 nautical mile range. The bonanza can carry six occupants and 70 lbs of baggage. Just like many other light planes, the Bonanza G36 is equipped with the GARMIN G1000 Nxi, which is one of the best out there.
    #Beechcraft #BeechcraftBonanza
    _________________________________________________
    The Team:
    Oscar Obierefu (Creative Executive)
    Nneji Valentine (Video Editor)
    Voiceover by Tomislav Krevzelj
    _________________________________________________
    You can Support us on Patreon here: / dwaynesaviation
    _________________________________________________
    To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
    _________________________________________________
    Our channel is about Aviation.
    We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

Комментарии • 77

  • @n3307v
    @n3307v 2 года назад +14

    75 years later and the Bonanza is still an amazing design. Beechcraft got it Right the First Time.

  • @n3307v
    @n3307v 2 года назад +18

    The early Bonanzas were not subject to the AD. Only a one-time skin thickness test. Mine has been flying 75 trouble-free years. An amazing design and hard to fly without a smile on your face.

  • @billmastin7007
    @billmastin7007 2 года назад +12

    I enjoy flying my 1989 B36TC now for 2 years. Great for the 3 hour trip from DFW to AXX and handles the mountain altitude just fine on takeoff. I appreciate the gear over the 210 and my wife likes the convenience of getting in through the cargo doors. Great upgrade from my Tiger.

    • @bradyoder5899
      @bradyoder5899 2 года назад

      What did the insurance company require for the upgrade as far as dual and solo time?
      Thanks

  • @user-vi2ue6nf8c
    @user-vi2ue6nf8c 12 дней назад

    I owned a v-tail. The plane could build up speed quickly for those not proficient. Doctors loved the plane, and because of their busy schedule and confidence in themselves, weren’t always that current. I knew some that lost their lives flying them. A navy pilot told me how to reduce elevation without it speeding up. Trim for flying level and then reduce power. The plane would descend without picking up speed. Perfect for IFR approaches

  • @es330td
    @es330td 9 месяцев назад

    My flight instructor was a friend of the family and let me sit left seat in his A36 Bonanza one day. Takeoffs and landings from three different airports. After doing all my time in C172 & C182, best 1.5 hours of flying time I've ever had. I still love that I have that line in my pilot logbook.

  • @pirep777
    @pirep777 2 года назад +33

    I think all Bonanza design engineers should be driving cars with no driver side door.

    • @stillwater1277
      @stillwater1277 Год назад

      Gotm

    • @mtadc1545
      @mtadc1545 Год назад +1

      Yeah, it’s ridiculous how it STILL doesn’t have a pilot door.

  • @anthonycyr9657
    @anthonycyr9657 2 года назад +1

    Just an all around great aircraft, my favorite next to the 182, another textron product..

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 года назад +3

    If I had the opportunity to getting into a G36 to fly on a Cross country flight with my family members it would be great

  • @cfinstr
    @cfinstr 2 года назад +4

    The early V tail 35’s Bonanzas had a 35 pound slug of lead I it’s nose to help out its “Balance issues.” It seems a better alternative should have been a small fundamental design change. I love how it flies and earned my Commercial License in a K-35. As a purist you have to wonder how it could have been improved, sans 35 pound dead weight in the nose.

    • @n3307v
      @n3307v 2 года назад

      No. My 1947 (D-766) doesn't have a weight in the nose.

    • @erichboese7209
      @erichboese7209 2 года назад +1

      @@n3307v correct...the ballast in the nose was to help compensate for aft CG issues in later models when the baggage area was extended.

    • @anthonycyr9657
      @anthonycyr9657 2 года назад

      A bigger engine..

  • @UnusualPilot
    @UnusualPilot 2 года назад +1

    OMG THAT BROWN AND WHITE BONANZA IS OURS lol where did you find that video hahaha N404v

    • @UnusualPilot
      @UnusualPilot 2 года назад

      Well as my family calls it cream and beige color

  • @jphoyost
    @jphoyost 2 года назад

    Impecable video about Bonanza!!! Thanks for being a reliable source of info to make wise decisions when buying a plane!!

  • @mikentx57
    @mikentx57 2 года назад +4

    The Cessna 195 looks like it is right out of 1936. But the Bonanza coming out right after the end the war must have seemed like it was a plane delivered by aliens from outer space. It was far more modern than any non-fighter created during the war. As a reference of how much of a leap this was for Beechcraft. Keep in mind that their single engine plane before the Bonanza was the Staggerwing.

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 года назад

    A lot of A-36 buyers are going turbo alley now so I remember seeing the B36TC model that had more gills for engine cooling

  • @arthurbrumagem3844
    @arthurbrumagem3844 2 года назад +3

    I’ll stick to my Piper as I can afford it and parts.

  • @timmholzhauer3342
    @timmholzhauer3342 2 года назад

    I can confirm that post 1984 A36 Bonanza’s are the best! ;-))

  • @Gryphon_19
    @Gryphon_19 2 года назад +3

    This video helped me decide the bonanza is not for me. Thanks for the info

    • @robh4671
      @robh4671 Год назад

      Me too 👍

    • @Dan_C604
      @Dan_C604 Год назад +1

      Why? Interested to know

  • @rodolfocastro3222
    @rodolfocastro3222 2 года назад

    Enjoyed the video! Thank you. Please do one for the Mooney M20J!

  • @truthful3777
    @truthful3777 2 года назад

    1 would prefer the Cessna 195, the radial sound, sounds Great. What more better view below due to high wing.

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 года назад

    The C195 on some had the cross wind landing gear and I’ve flown the V-35 and loved it and now the ruddervators on alert for spots of corrosion and this is a problem but unfortunately there are companies that can take care of this and the cost is very expensive

  • @pettsnjam
    @pettsnjam 2 года назад +1

    I love my A36

  • @paulbrouyere1735
    @paulbrouyere1735 2 года назад +1

    Can you help me find some building plans for a 1949 twin bonanza? The one Jacques Brel was flying(French-Flemish singer-songwriter)

  • @user-vi2ue6nf8c
    @user-vi2ue6nf8c 6 месяцев назад

    I owned a v-tail. One better be proficient flying one, as it can get away from those not trained and current

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 12 дней назад

      Any airplane can "get away from those *not trained and current."*

  • @MTBAviator
    @MTBAviator 2 года назад +1

    I’m surprised it doesn’t come standard with landing lights in the wingtips. Or have the option for a composite prop.

    • @jonhinman2471
      @jonhinman2471 6 дней назад

      The wingtips have optional tanks which might be why. A carbon prop can always be fitted aftermarket

  • @backcountyrpilot
    @backcountyrpilot Год назад

    At 4:23 you mention the G1000 display, but show a 530/430 combo. At 4:53 you begin showing the G1000

  • @coniacman
    @coniacman 2 года назад +3

    As a licensed aircraft mechanic, I've worked on many general aviation aircraft. Different brands all have their pros and cons. To me, Beech parts were always way overpriced. Having that non-removable lower engine cowling was a pain in the a$$ too. Of course, all retractable gear planes have their maintenance issues.

  • @user-px7rs5ep8n
    @user-px7rs5ep8n 14 дней назад

    I see a listing online for around 50k, would that be a good deal?

  • @brentfranklin3557
    @brentfranklin3557 2 года назад

    I want one

  • @RealSerie26
    @RealSerie26 2 года назад +5

    Beautiful airplane. Useful load of 1,076 lbs…for 6 passengers. More like 4 if Americans.

  • @brentfranklin3557
    @brentfranklin3557 2 года назад

    I would transport any where

  • @skeleguns10oooooo10
    @skeleguns10oooooo10 2 года назад

    Baron 58 has similar parts but with 2 engines

  • @evanbarr9270
    @evanbarr9270 2 года назад

    Ok so does the straight tail (Debonair ) fly better than the same equipment v tail ?Strictly the 2 smaller planes not the big a-36.

  • @owencarey2954
    @owencarey2954 2 года назад

    Beechcraft after this video aired: *STONKS*

  • @user-jw5nw4db7m
    @user-jw5nw4db7m 8 месяцев назад

    Could have bought any six place aircraft I wanted and the Cessna 210 Centurion is better. Center of gravity limits Bonanzas, dislike climbing on wing to enter, etc, etc, Could make a whole list of ways Centurion beats Bonanza performance. Bonanzas do have much nicer interior, Cessna could do so much better …

  • @skipgetelman3418
    @skipgetelman3418 2 года назад

    Expensive but you get quality

  • @samuelgiesbrecht9450
    @samuelgiesbrecht9450 2 года назад

    8:55 range 716 or 920 nm?

  • @SOLDOZER
    @SOLDOZER 8 месяцев назад

    SR22 is the "Doctor killer". Not the Bonanza,

  • @performancespecialties2756
    @performancespecialties2756 Год назад

    Navion video?

  • @stevec6455
    @stevec6455 5 месяцев назад

    I had a 1978 A36. Best airplane I had. But there is no such thing as a best family small airplane. Instead take your family on a scheduled airline. It is much safer and more likely to not kill your family.

  • @joesteffe6155
    @joesteffe6155 2 года назад

    can the banoza G36 come with Pressure cabins ??

  • @brentfranklin3557
    @brentfranklin3557 2 года назад

    Ok I need 2 y’all yell when you send the first one I’ll need to get a license

  • @BrettsCorner92
    @BrettsCorner92 Год назад

    I don't know, you would have to Ask Buddy Holly

    • @smark1180
      @smark1180 12 дней назад

      Another YT lemming repeating something he saw/heard.

  • @waynesilva3129
    @waynesilva3129 2 года назад

    The beech is the pitty of single engine pistons. Everything else is just basic transportation.

  • @flyboykfpr
    @flyboykfpr Год назад

    The Beech is a fine airplane, the Cadillac of planes, but if you stall in one it is almost impossible to recover unless you have over 5 k altitude.

  • @danmoriarty1278
    @danmoriarty1278 Год назад +4

    That is one highly irritating voice!

  • @rocket862
    @rocket862 2 года назад +2

    Fun video,but the narrator sounds like like a joke.

  • @normanmarino7285
    @normanmarino7285 2 года назад

    ..

  • @sailboatbob3969
    @sailboatbob3969 2 года назад +1

    are they out of their fucking minds????????? $800,000 for a single engine piston plane? you can buy a lot of airline tickets just for the selling price. never mind the yearly costs

    • @mikentx57
      @mikentx57 2 года назад +2

      Beech planes were always more expensive. They have been basically the ‘Mercedes-Benz’ of of aircraft. Also what is making them so expensive and Cessna’s too is that they are owned by the same company, Textron. It very much is a monopoly at work here.

    • @williamrmcintosh4343
      @williamrmcintosh4343 2 года назад +1

      Yeah but airline tickets don't have v-tails

    • @user-xw3sw8gg3y
      @user-xw3sw8gg3y 8 месяцев назад

      It's not for everyone...

    • @jonhinman2471
      @jonhinman2471 6 дней назад

      I agree, I'd get an older good one used. We need a modern version of this aircraft under 50k that runs on propane with foldable wings. I guarantee that will sell

  • @HEMIdouglas
    @HEMIdouglas 2 года назад

    This design should be decommissioned and grounded by the FAA as having too many accidents.

  • @tropicthndr
    @tropicthndr 2 года назад

    Does everybody who just wants to believe, have their heads in the sand. See a dreamy picture and it’s all heaven. Better go to Katherynreport get your head out of your butt and look at how many Continental engine failures have occurred in this plane and the Cirrus just lately, with the same garbage power plant. Recently N67CH, N1HH, N5093C, N654HR, only to name a few. There’s more but those are just dumb pilots flying Bonanza’s that shouldn’t be pilots.

  • @flyinbry
    @flyinbry 2 года назад

    Bonanza is a dog. It’s not really an excellent plane.

    • @erichboese7209
      @erichboese7209 2 года назад +2

      A "dog" by what standards? Compared to an F16...sure. Compared to other aircraft in the same category/class...classifying it as a "dog" is more than a little disingenuous. Does it meet any/all mission profiles....NO. No such airplane exists.

    • @jonhinman2471
      @jonhinman2471 6 дней назад

      Troll

    • @flyinbry
      @flyinbry 5 дней назад

      @@erichboese7209 compared to any other plane in its class. 6 seat. I have thousands of hours on these planes. Bonanza too heavy.

    • @flyinbry
      @flyinbry 5 дней назад

      @@jonhinman2471 fella I speak from vast experience. Some people really like beech that’s ok. I wish all beech people well