2024 Colorado/Canyon 2.7 HO vs. 2.7 vs. Last gen 2.8 Duramax and 3.6 V6 0-60 on GPS.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 мар 2024
  • Welcome back guys! Here’s another 0-60 compilation but this time it’s all the important 2nd and 3rd gen Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon twins! The 2.8 Duramax diesel, the 3.6 V6, and of course the new mid and high output TurboMax!
    Like, comment, subscribe, and take care! 😎
    Dealer link below…
    www.twinfalls-chevy.com/

Комментарии • 23

  • @andrewshoe6832
    @andrewshoe6832 2 месяца назад +1

    I like the analysis here. You did a great job covering the bases on the external influences of the test. And more than everything else, thank you for not making this a 15 min video. Liked and subbed

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  2 месяца назад +1

      Thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed it and I appreciate your support! 😁
      I try to keep 0-60 compilations to 4-8m, as much as I enjoy talking I can see on the analytics that over half the people watching like to skip straight to the numbers lol. 🤷‍♂️😅

  • @JohnJohnA101
    @JohnJohnA101 2 месяца назад

    Good comparison video.

  • @brians.1357
    @brians.1357 2 месяца назад

    Sweet comparison video, been waiting for this one. To be fair to the Colorado/Canyon V6 fan boys that 2016 GMC Canyon you tested was the 305hp/269lb-ft torque version with the 6spd. The 2017-2022 model year had the 308hp/275lb-ft of torque with the 8spd.
    I have a 2017’ Colorado and maybe not 2secs quicker to beat the 2.7L but it’s faster than that 2016 Canyon just judging from watching its leisurely run to 60mph at 8.6secs 😳

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  2 месяца назад

      I’m glad you enjoyed it! I haven’t done much to research the last gen of trucks so thanks for sharing the powertrain update they received! That would have definitely narrowed the gap a bit had I found newer examples to test! 🙂

    • @PizzaRollsGod
      @PizzaRollsGod 11 дней назад

      ​@AutomotiveAnonymous208, the white colorado you pointed at in the beginning should have an 8spd in it and 308hp over the old gen 6spd and 305hp

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  11 дней назад

      Thanks!!

  • @NGMonocrom
    @NGMonocrom 2 месяца назад +1

    I will always go for the highest output engine. I refuse to be squished on the highway, like a slow-moving turtle. 🐢

  • @0091dude
    @0091dude 23 дня назад

    Wish they still gave the Diesel option

  • @aaronmiles1971
    @aaronmiles1971 День назад

    See if off road mode changes anything

  • @stephanstuelp4628
    @stephanstuelp4628 2 месяца назад

    What about a 2wd H.O. ?

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  2 месяца назад

      That would be a big smokey burnout! At least without some very sticky after market tires. 😅

  • @MrTimbo17
    @MrTimbo17 2 месяца назад +2

    Because you buy a truck for 0-60. If that metric is most important to you, then you should not be driving a truck. Here’s an idea, let’s do some towing, mpg and payload tests with sports cars.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  2 месяца назад +3

      I mean some people legitimately do, why else would someone pay 100k for a Cybertruck, Raptor R, or TRX? 😜
      But you have a fair point, thanks for sharing your opinion! 🙂

    • @MrTimbo17
      @MrTimbo17 2 месяца назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 they don’t buy them foremost for 0-60 because if that was the basis for purchasing they would have many other choices for much less money

    • @johnwest6977
      @johnwest6977 2 месяца назад +1

      @@MrTimbo17 it's not that serious bud

    • @FredRTP96
      @FredRTP96 2 месяца назад +1

      Lmfaooo, okay boomer

    • @endless_potatoes
      @endless_potatoes 2 месяца назад +1

      Delusional. With how fast vehicles drive on the free way you need a fast vehicle to keep to safe. You're probably the guy in the left lane going 10 under