The ocean been here for hundreds of millions of years so has life, we survived astroid impacts, solar flares, volcanic eruptions, continental drift, hurricanes my point is we will all be fine
@@chriss7930 Solar farms absorb heat energy and convert it to electricity. This means less waste heat in the environment. The waste heat that isn’t absorbed by the solar farm would have gone into the environment anyway in the absence of the solar farm - it's not additional waste heat. Reflection just changes the final location of the unabsorbed waste heat.
@@chriss7930 You literally do not understand what you are saying, at all. That is quite literally not how that works, and that fact should cause you to reflect on your values and worldview. Your knee-jerk reaction is to spout off literally impossible nonsense because it backs up your obviously preconceived worldview, and being threatened by logic and facts scares you. Step back, sit down, drink some water, take a breath, and reflect, Chriss.
We are at 0,5C higher than recent most highest measured record in Northern Atlantic. That is a huge jump upwards, because oceans on average have slowly risen only around 0,8C so far. This current state is totally out of bounds.
There is an irony in that the person who is the main driver in the efforts to go to Mars has also been more effective than just about any other single person in moving the world away from fossil fuels. The Tesla Roadster and Model S showed the automotive industry what is possible. This spurred the transformation of the transportation segment.
@@deborahschumann8286 No, I think the tipping point is now with the El Niño combined with the anthropogenic global warming, that will most likely trigger the methane from permafrost so it's probably too late now.
If by people you mean mega economies like China, India and the USA then I agree with you. Otherwise I think you need to catch up on 2 decades on this subject first.
@@nauticfilms Coal mining/production was nothing compared to oil drilling/production, actually. The age of oil is the explosion in fossil fuel emissions.
We sure do!! We go to incredible length to make as much damage as possible to animals(slaughterhouses, fish farming , shooting mivrant birds..) We contaminate rivers, lakes, the ocean, the air, fight wars against each other, traffic human beings, rob, rape, steal, deceit, exploit everything that moved...... That's the virus we are for the planet and all livi g beings
Fisheries dies. Plankton dies also ensuring even longer period of dieoff. There is way less food for all animals in the ocean. It is extremely likely that fish catches will plummet soon and remain low after that.
By burning 8B tons of coal a year, and 100M barrels of oil A DAY, we pump 27 ZJ of heat energy into our oceans a year, where 400ZJ are already stored. A ZJ is 1 X 10 to the 21st BTU's. Is it getting hot in here or is it just me?
All activity on earth by human cannot even compare to the entry of our sun. It just so happens that our suns solar activity is one of the highest on record.
@@americanlivesmatter7118 So, give me a number, like, you know, the 400ZJ we've sunk into the oceans since 1951. You know, "numbers". Numbers talk and BS walks.
Animal agriculture is the leading cause of deforestation, habitat destruction, water pollution, ocean dead zones and *species extinction* . -United Nations FAO The most comprehensive *meta-analysis* conducted to date with 119 countries, shows avoiding animal products is the *"SINGLE BIGGEST WAY"* to reduce our environmental impact. -Oxford University
@@ukeyaoitrash2618 🍔 so many amazing plant-based burgers! 🍔🍔🍔 Risk of death from cancer, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, infections, kidney disease, liver disease and lung disease all increase with the amount of meat consumed. - National Cancer Institute The only diet ever scientifically shown to reverse our leading cause of human death (Cardiovascular Disease kills 33% of humans), with 99.4% success, is a *Whole Food Plant Based* diet. -Esselstyn, journal Family Practice
That's great. I don't give a f***. Me eating meat over the course of my lifetime is less than one private jet flight. I ain't falling for the 'it's the plebs fault' bull sh**.
@@ShreddedWheat-lj6vg Flying from London to Athens generates around 353kg to 405kg of CO2 per passenger. Eating a 75g serving of beef one to two times a week for 40 years generates 241,600kg of CO2 emissions. Just 2 servings per week (very low estimate) is more than 600 times as damaging if you only did that for 40 years. Read the science, do the math, stop killing others unnecessarily.
Meanwhile in Sweden we have given up. Our current government is reversing all work done by the previous government and we are moving backwards. Never vote rightwing.
That's sad to hear. Here in the UK, we've had right wing governments for most of the past 40 years, but even the left wing ones (when they were briefly in power) weren't any good for the environment. (Thatcher did at least found a new national park, and Boris Johnson did announce a new initiative to replant 300,000km of hedgerows - both of them Conservatives. The new bunch we have now? Money, money, money, self, self, self...) I can see it is going to have to take massive death rates among humans, animals and trees to finally make governments around the world start to sit up and listen, by then it'll be too late anyway.
Social progress backlash is global. And sponsored by the petroleum industry so they can maintain demand for fuels. Literally causing wars and killing us all for a couple more years of profitability.
You've got to be doing better than the United States in terms of Climate Change. The Biden Administration is refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. What's the point of refilling it when we shouldn't be burning it?
you can rely on that fact… Nature always roots out the least survivable species - we’re definitely on that list - if for no other reasons- We don’t observe the basic rule of animals - “don’t sh** where you eat” in a broader sense
@@Youbetternowatchthis The ecosystem will not survive if greenhouse gases reach high enough levels to destroy the entire ozone layer. It may well happen. NASA physicist Jim Anderson lectured on this ten years ago.
There was 4.3 billion people on the planet when Michael Jackson Album "Thriller" was on top of the charts. Today we have almost 9 Billion , of course things are going to change and not for the better . More people need and used *MORE* not less.
The claim always was: Don't criticize this, since they don't use that much per head. Today: We want the same livestyle. People from before: They want to live like us. It's their right, but start cutting your own emissions.
I'm willing to bet there is going to be a lot more rain than expected during el Nino due to ocean temps raising. Right now Australia is getting unusual waves of moisture coming down from NW Aus and north Island of NZ is suffering continual drenchings from up north in tropics. There is extra heat around NZ and NW Aus. These rains are out of character. Also heat in Antarctic ocean heat and storms have been extreme for months. These can be are seen on regular weather forcasts. This Ocean heat will outgas. If it is higher than ever, it will be interesting to see if it behaves differently.
Thank you for reporting on this. We need to organize as citizens of a world on which we and all life faces extinction if we don't change our ways. We can't go on business as usual.
@@markanthony3275 Nope, not any scientist with an ounce of credibility. The doomsday rhetoric stems solely from the climate movement, which you've just proven once again is the domain of the Left and nothing more than an attempt to undermine capitalism in the guise of saving the planet. Socialism has never produced a thriving economy anywhere in the world, at any time in history, managed by anybody. It is a proven abject failure and leaves a swath of destruction everywhere it's been tried, so good luck with that.
@@markanthony3275 oh yeah cause capitalism is just working out SO well for the millions of people living in poverty and the planet that's currently burning up....like do you have rocks for brains or?
There is a theory that requires further study. The removal of oil from the subsurface is largely responsible for man-induced climate change, possibly exceeding what we already understand about the effects of burning it off into the atmosphere. Oil acts as a cooling barrier between the earth’s molten core a the surface, similar to how antifreeze and oil protects your engine from overheating. Remove it and your engine quickly overheats. Many thousands of oil wells all around the planet have been removing oil for over 100 years, so it stands to reason that there would be ramifications since it was previously intact for millions of years.
Its actually countries with unsustainable levels of consumption per capita, there are others with large populations who hardly contribute to global emissions. Of course though,a growing population does not help, but its not the main issue. Our economic system and culture in the West predominantly needs to change but too many vested interests to keep it going, greed and ignorance until the end it seems.
Mostly in combination with increase of consumption in the formerly poor countries, which also makes the wealthier countries refuse to cut down more aggressively.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us one thousand years to the past of the universe. Today April 10, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 84 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million in the past. On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA.
Don't forget, the melting ice is absorbing 80 times as much heat energy PER GRAM on its way to becoming liquid, so less ice, far more heated water in a feed forward cycle to the extinction of life on this planet, the only one we have to survive on. CONTRACEPTION.
yeah ,maybe some will care when their fishing industries gets effected.. we are guilty for this, not el nino, they have even been waiting for it, due to the long period with el nina.. the acidity isn't something new, (not when it have been known), and coral bleaching is probably a smaller problem, when even the animals with exoskeletons are effected by and from it.. it is alarming, mostly because we in the bigger type of normal climate picture, are towards colder climate, but it still rises, and we almost get heat records every year, even when we had el nina.. so what did they expect would happen?
Urgent action needs to be taken and we've learned that we can not rely on individual decisions and good will. We need to demand our governments urgent laws and measures to mitigate this mess.
The journalist said "the iceans go through cycles of hearing and cooling"… That’s wrong! oceans go through ciffereng circulations patterns, but the amount of energy is increasing.
Green Energy Tech is up to the task to mitigate the environmental impact of Global Warming. The question is can we deploy the tech in mass quickly enough?
Anything about the volcanos affecting the temperatures? No, of course not, it's all about "human" climate change. The many volcanos that have erupted have nothing to do with any of it.
The current era volcanoes are trivial. If you don't have an area of land as big as a medium-size nation completely uninhabitable because it's under hundreds of metres of molten lava, you're not experiencing an era of heightened vulcanism and you can't blame volcanoes for your problems. With satellite carbon tracking we can even measure how much carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are being released by each volcano. But you'd know that if you did your reading.
As the climate heads into greater extremes globally, how can we best deal with future climate crises? The short answer is that we cannot deal with them unless we take care of nature's inner balance. We live in a tightly-closed and interdependent system in which everything boomerangs back to us. While living in such a system, we need to reconsider what we want and think, and how we treat each other, because our human connections are the primary influence on how nature responds to us. It is common to think that climate is dependent on factors outside of us-whether it be balances between heat and cold in the environment, or the effects of various kinds of pollution we emit-because we lack a complete picture of how our attitudes to each other bring about the strongest responses from nature toward us. No creature distorts nature the way that we people do. And it is not simply a matter of switching to renewable energy sources, electric cars and the like; it is a matter of how we relate to each other. If we truly wish to witness more balance throughout nature and not have to deal with all kinds of cold waves and other natural disasters, then similarly to how we have electricity, water and gas meters in our homes, we should also have meters that count how much evil we emit into the world from our negative attitudes to each other. What I mean is that if we could feel the extent to which we emit negative forces into the world, which negatively ricochet back to us, then we would wish to change this negative driver within us. We would want to switch it to a drive that makes our human connections positive, and which harmonizes us with nature. In simple terms, when we get up in the morning, we should first and foremost consider what we need to do in order for all people to have it good. Developing such an attitude is not so simple, yet we will need to seriously work on it as we head into the future. A life of increasing blows from nature or a life of peace and harmony depends on the extent to which we impact a shift in our attitudes to each other-from negative to positive.
It's very easy to find evidence of goodness in one's thoughts. It's much harder to translate that into action. Such as composting your own poo so you aren't polluting, growing your own food organically, digging up your lawn and replacing it with pollinator gardens. That all shows much more kindness to life and is much more impactful than positive thoughts. But it requires a lot of time and labor. Most people aren't willing to do it.
Great comment! I ran an organic sheep and vegetable farm in upstate NY until job loss forced me to give-up and move. I have always raised organic veg's in home gardens where-ever I've lived, and community gardens as I now live in an apt. and am retired. I burn, on ave., 5 gals of gas a month and live in a 500sq ft one rm apt. and recommend all of us reducing our carbon footprints every day on RUclips feeds. But, you are absolutely correct in pointing out the old adage: actions speak louder than words.@@everythingmatters6308
We always say: Bring criminals to Justice and give victim’s family Justice. It can also be applied on human beings: Nature will bring human beings to Justice for the criminal we committed to this planet!
X-Files Humans vs. Alien Vampires For a rich man to solve the climate crisis...is like trying to drive a camel through the eye of a needle. Because vampires (greed) are blind and cannot see the ignorance of destroying the planet.
why dont we make a gigantic solar panal in the ocean. a giganic solar panal with wind catchers as well. you could anchor it down so you could capture the energy of the waves too. basically a gigantic bowl with wind mills on it and water wheels on it. Or instead of a bowl make it an incredibly massive durable and hollow solar sphere. so its always floating. anchor it down so it cant move too much and boom. free energy
The range of ocean temperatures from the 80s to present day. Has been about 18.6-24.9 depending on what month you are in. fluctuation of a month averages about 1 degrees throughout the months of all years. And considering the data is incomplete as we have no idea what temperatures were pre the 20th century, nor the fluctuations. Just saying anyone who can admit that the currents life in the ocean has been around for a very, very long time, and we have a needle of data out of a mountain of hay. There is absolutely zero proof a few degrees is bad. I just don't buy the alarmism, I just don't.
@@markanthony3275 According to "The Guardian" the bear population has dropped by nearly 30% since 1987, "Firstpost" says that in Canada’s Western Hudson Bay the population has fallen from 842 in 2016 to 618 in 2022.
@@0topon My sources are the Inuit that live there and hunt there...who is the Guardian's source? Another thing about the Arctic that they get wrong is this notion that the Arctic must be covered in thick multi-year ice. If that happened the polar bears would go extinct...because polar bears feed on seals, seals feed on fish, fish feed on plankton, and plankton need sunlight in order for photosynthesis to work...no open water means no sunlight, no sunlight means no plankton, no plankton means no fish, no fish means no seals...and no seals means no polar bears. They get the bear population wrong too. Because of over hunting the polar bear population was at an all-time low in 1970 of just over 500 bears. Then they put a hunting moratorium in place...the current population is over 5000 today. I wouldn't trust the Guardian to get the weather right. You probably are unaware that in the 1940's a Canadian RCMP vessel called the St. Roch made a two way passage through the Arctic in one season...it has a wooden hull. Today you can't make the same trip without the help of a steel hulled ice breaker...what does that tell you? There is more ice today that there was in the 1940's. The St. Roch is in a museum in British Columbia, Canada. Much earlier in the 20th century polar explorer Admunsen made a complete one way passage in a dinky little ship with a 10 horsepower motor...how much ice was present then? A lot less than there is today. Always compare what is said by the historical record...and in this case, the record proves the Guardian wrong.
The problem is so serious world Wide that you should shut down All schools for one entire year And get the students to plant Trees , and protect and water them too . sacrifice for a better Future . Have forest reserves .
And , yu want a whole ecosystem of things to have the ability to figure out which mosquitos have malaria and the ability to precision drive them to specific targets? .
@@RRStout I would like encourage you to pick some geography books and make an earnest attempt at study. IDK what conditions in the education environment aided in your opinion. I hope you learn & perhaps help others who are mislead as well.
At first I thought of like cloth or floating ball mats with holes so fish can maybe fall back in, but then to some kinda large flipper to move water, but now I am thinking of fish tank water filters, specifically movement of air. Idk on them wind turbines, as it takes too many years, but how much would it cost to put tubing, and what size tubing would work to move air, say, off the coasts of Texas, maybe the West and East coasts as well? Is the benefits of having them off more northern parts of the coast, say even in Alaska, a very good thing to keep how ocean water being cool then gradually getting warm as it goes down the West coast a very good idea to keep that system healthy by keeping it somewhat close to the past ? Of course these are all in supplement to hopefully producing less greenhouse gases, as well as storing them. Have the dead fish been collected off the Texas coast to make fertilizer?
But hm in solar air pump, and small vs larger bubbles. And pumps going across might sound ok, but idk if something covers them. So maybe larger bubbles, or are they too disruptive and no not exchange oxygen as well as if there were smaller ones.
Fabulous thread! Many great thoughtful and informative comments and replies. This is what the internet could have been, before the corporate overlords took it over for the single purpose of higher profits. We are our own worse enemy, well, at least the richest among us.
It's been steady-state for millennia. As have all the other natural systems that maintained earth's temperature before we started pumping masses of fossil carbon into the atmosphere.
@@Wolfcamp555 Yes, the oceans have been VERY warm for La Nina years. They have not been cool. Are you guys reading even the first paragraph of ANY reports? I guess there is a new definition of "cooler" for you guys.
"The last El Niño event occurred between February and August 2019 and was quite weak. Between July 2020 and March 2023, a rare triple-dip La Niña suppressed rising global temperatures. El Niño events normally last somewhere between nine months and two years but can be longer." - Live Science Looking across many El Niño events we see a bumpy but upward trend for their peak temperatures similar to what we see for other years.
Look up to heaven, where our salvation comes from. Jesus Christ has warned us that the last days will be plagued with so much disasters that people will curse God. Humble your hearts, stop staring into your phones and open the book of Life aka Holy Bible. The Lord Jesus Is, and coming soon. All who belive should get excited! His coming is near
Why do you think it's catastrophic there will be warm water fish later and nature will adjust everything is new what your not used to like one rainforest is taken down but in it expands because it's necessary for plants to survive rest of the dead planets are just example how people couldn't stick with growing plants
I challenge the expert's statement that wind normally does measurable mixing into the "deep ocean" (which is below 700 m) from the permanent thermocline above. It's my understand that the wind mixes only to 200 m depth and below that it's mostly the dense water around Antarctica, which of course lifts the ~entire ocean (except polar and some sub-polar) by a regular 1.9 m (6.3 feet) per year each and every year by shoving under it as a wedge and lifting the ocean (trivial calculation).
I wonder how is it possible dust transport has been reduced as global warming has rised wind force/speed. By checking PM (both 2.5 and 10 um) on Earth Null School it is very noticeable the rise of them along last years. (?)
Are we getting closer to the sun? Has anyone notice the bushes and shrubs/grass is burned off or dehydrated even tho it's been raining through out the year
Earth is slowly, very slowing getting further from the sun. Solar irradiation is slightly lower now than decades ago. Let's see: Further from the sun, less irradiation from the sun, but warming. Whatever could it be that is warming the earth? I hope someone looks into this.
@scottekoontz my problem is it's 73 degrees outside, but all the grass/bushes/shrubs look brown and burnt. No new growth. And for some reason, outside seems brighter? Everywhere I go is the same. The sun burns....but it's 73 degrees
@lynneades4632 you know something is happening where we have no future. It's different outside, everyone knows it, and the only things I notice, is the brightness of the sunlight, the browning of grasses/bushes, and the sun's rays burn stronger in 70 degree weather. And if we are moving closer, why would our world leaders tell us? That mass panic, there's nothing we can do.
Earth is an ocean planet and when the ocean dies... Well... Don't look up.
💯
@humnnn indeed, only the creatures living in it do
@@humnnnWell, depends on what you consider dead. If you have a fluid that can not support any life I would say it's dead.
Agree the ocean rules pretty much everything
The ocean been here for hundreds of millions of years so has life, we survived astroid impacts, solar flares, volcanic eruptions, continental drift, hurricanes my point is we will all be fine
Just think for a moment how much energy it must take to heat up an OCEAN
Imagine how much heat solar farms reflect back into the environment !!
@@chriss7930
Solar farms absorb heat energy and convert it to electricity. This means less waste heat in the environment. The waste heat that isn’t absorbed by the solar farm would have gone into the environment anyway in the absence of the solar farm - it's not additional waste heat. Reflection just changes the final location of the unabsorbed waste heat.
@@chriss7930 You literally do not understand what you are saying, at all. That is quite literally not how that works, and that fact should cause you to reflect on your values and worldview. Your knee-jerk reaction is to spout off literally impossible nonsense because it backs up your obviously preconceived worldview, and being threatened by logic and facts scares you. Step back, sit down, drink some water, take a breath, and reflect, Chriss.
@@cloudpoint0 Plus they shade the ground below them.
@@chriss7930 Imagine if you actually learned anything and did some real thinking.
The oceanic phytoplankton produces ~70% of atmospheric oxygen. We should think about this first.
Enjoy what little time is left.
@@EmeraldView seems plausible
Thinking is not what the vast majority do, not even a little well.
nailsssssssss11!
We are at 0,5C higher than recent most highest measured record in Northern Atlantic. That is a huge jump upwards, because oceans on average have slowly risen only around 0,8C so far. This current state is totally out of bounds.
"Everything is getting worse, faster." ~ Peter Carter (IPCC Reviewer)
Climate tipping point.
@@lyrimetacurl0 😢
@@sbeast64arent expknential functions fun
People are too focused on space and Mars colonization, and not focused enough on saving Earth.
Saving earth? That ship sailed 23 years ago. We are that far past the tipping point.
There is an irony in that the person who is the main driver in the efforts to go to Mars has also been more effective than just about any other single person in moving the world away from fossil fuels.
The Tesla Roadster and Model S showed the automotive industry what is possible.
This spurred the transformation of the transportation segment.
@@deborahschumann8286 No, I think the tipping point is now with the El Niño combined with the anthropogenic global warming, that will most likely trigger the methane from permafrost so it's probably too late now.
If by people you mean mega economies like China, India and the USA then I agree with you. Otherwise I think you need to catch up on 2 decades on this subject first.
If the oceans die the land dies too.
Truth died first. Before climate change there was moral climate change and truth was replaced by GREED!
Amazing achievement that homosapiens managed to pretty much destroy the environment so quickly since the age of oil began.
Greed.
Human nature wasn't compatible with the technology we were able to develop.
started with the age of coal, actually.
@@nauticfilms Coal mining/production was nothing compared to oil drilling/production, actually. The age of oil is the explosion in fossil fuel emissions.
Extinction speed run, 100%
We’re ruled by old men who think about the next term’s profits, not the next generation’s well-being
We humans deserve this.
We sure do!! We go to incredible length to make as much damage as possible to animals(slaughterhouses, fish farming , shooting mivrant birds..) We contaminate rivers, lakes, the ocean, the air, fight wars against each other, traffic human beings, rob, rape, steal, deceit, exploit everything that moved...... That's the virus we are for the planet and all livi g beings
Not all, but all will be paying though
Some do. But some humans who live unselfish, simple, traditional lifestyles, the other animals and all the plants don't.
You're not wrong.
Most of us .
Yes but it's the poor organisms that suffer.
If the fish are leaving the ocean, where will they live? There's no room for them in our country.
@@alexsilent5603 and make the Birds pay for it!
😂
@@alexsilent5603 Trump said he'll get right on that.
I hear you there. Every since they started leaving the ocean on mass and coming to my country they’ve been taking jobs from the locals
Fisheries dies. Plankton dies also ensuring even longer period of dieoff. There is way less food for all animals in the ocean. It is extremely likely that fish catches will plummet soon and remain low after that.
Save Our Planet Now
By burning 8B tons of coal a year, and 100M barrels of oil A DAY, we pump 27 ZJ of heat energy into our oceans a year, where 400ZJ are already stored. A ZJ is 1 X 10 to the 21st BTU's. Is it getting hot in here or is it just me?
All activity on earth by human cannot even compare to the entry of our sun. It just so happens that our suns solar activity is one of the highest on record.
@@americanlivesmatter7118 False. Cite your sources.
It only adds up to less than .0015% co2 increase.
@@americanlivesmatter7118 So, give me a number, like, you know, the 400ZJ we've sunk into the oceans since 1951. You know, "numbers". Numbers talk and BS walks.
@@jrrarglblarg9241 WMO, NOAA, and many others TNTC. And, yours?
When the ocean dies most life on Earth will suffocate. Have nice day.
Thanks!
Complete and utter chaos by 2030.
If not earlier. Exponentials move FAST in the end.
Sad for marine life.
Marine life simply isn't that fragile. Whales that live in the Arctic migrate to the Sea of Cortez every year.
I am convinced we now stand as a bookend to humanity. Love one another, it may soon be all we have left. Let us be stoic in the face of calamity.
No kids here Lol. Party on Wayne!
Animal agriculture is the leading cause of deforestation, habitat destruction, water pollution, ocean dead zones and *species extinction* . -United Nations FAO
The most comprehensive *meta-analysis* conducted to date with 119 countries, shows avoiding animal products is the *"SINGLE BIGGEST WAY"* to reduce our environmental impact. -Oxford University
On it! And healthier for it!
Burger yummy!
@@ukeyaoitrash2618 🍔 so many amazing plant-based burgers! 🍔🍔🍔
Risk of death from cancer, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, infections, kidney disease, liver disease and lung disease all increase with the amount of meat consumed. - National Cancer Institute
The only diet ever scientifically shown to reverse our leading cause of human death (Cardiovascular Disease kills 33% of humans), with 99.4% success, is a *Whole Food Plant Based* diet. -Esselstyn, journal Family Practice
That's great. I don't give a f***. Me eating meat over the course of my lifetime is less than one private jet flight. I ain't falling for the 'it's the plebs fault' bull sh**.
@@ShreddedWheat-lj6vg Flying from London to Athens generates around 353kg to 405kg of CO2 per passenger.
Eating a 75g serving of beef one to two times a week for 40 years generates 241,600kg of CO2 emissions.
Just 2 servings per week (very low estimate) is more than 600 times as damaging if you only did that for 40 years.
Read the science, do the math, stop killing others unnecessarily.
Meanwhile in Sweden we have given up. Our current government is reversing all work done by the previous government and we are moving backwards. Never vote rightwing.
That's sad to hear. Here in the UK, we've had right wing governments for most of the past 40 years, but even the left wing ones (when they were briefly in power) weren't any good for the environment.
(Thatcher did at least found a new national park, and Boris Johnson did announce a new initiative to replant 300,000km of hedgerows - both of them Conservatives.
The new bunch we have now?
Money, money, money, self, self, self...)
I can see it is going to have to take massive death rates among humans, animals and trees to finally make governments around the world start to sit up and listen, by then it'll be too late anyway.
Social progress backlash is global. And sponsored by the petroleum industry so they can maintain demand for fuels.
Literally causing wars and killing us all for a couple more years of profitability.
You've got to be doing better than the United States in terms of Climate Change. The Biden Administration is refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. What's the point of refilling it when we shouldn't be burning it?
Why can’t there be a left wing party with a sensible immigration policy? They would get votes from both sides.
@@User-vz4xm what would you call a sensible immigration policy?
Hopefully mother nature will protect itself and destroy mankind,us humans don't deserve this planet
It's working on it
you can rely on that fact… Nature always roots out the least survivable species - we’re definitely on that list - if for no other reasons- We don’t observe the basic rule of animals - “don’t sh** where you eat” in a broader sense
@@Youbetternowatchthis The ecosystem will not survive if greenhouse gases reach high enough levels to destroy the entire ozone layer. It may well happen. NASA physicist Jim Anderson lectured on this ten years ago.
@@Youbetternowatchthis Well, I can't educate the willfully ignorant.
It's too late. That too, is something that's a fact. How hopeless. Humans.... The most parasitic thing on the planet. Hands down. 💔
Capitalism is the cause of this issue
There was 4.3 billion people on the planet when Michael Jackson Album "Thriller" was on top of the charts.
Today we have almost 9 Billion , of course things are going to change and not for the better .
More people need and used *MORE* not less.
Good point. 6.8 billion, though in 2009. Too many humans.
The claim always was: Don't criticize this, since they don't use that much per head. Today: We want the same livestyle. People from before: They want to live like us. It's their right, but start cutting your own emissions.
At the edge of extinction only love remains
This isn't just the beginning of what lays ahead, it is a continuation of weather cycles that changes the way we live, eat and survive.
I'm willing to bet there is going to be a lot more rain than expected during el Nino due to ocean temps raising.
Right now Australia is getting unusual waves of moisture coming down from NW Aus and north Island of NZ is suffering continual drenchings from up north in tropics. There is extra heat around NZ and NW Aus. These rains are out of character.
Also heat in Antarctic ocean heat and storms have been extreme for months.
These can be are seen on regular weather forcasts.
This Ocean heat will outgas. If it is higher than ever, it will be interesting to see if it behaves differently.
Depends on location, more droughts and more floods rather than medium weather.
My girlfriend says it's selfish to bring kids into such a world
Well, we are in no shortage of humans, in my opinion.
You may want to visit an orphanage every month, ask the caretakers what the kids need. Pay it forward, mate.
Shes a keeper
Shes based
What a sensible lady she is.
Thank you for reporting on this. We need to organize as citizens of a world on which we and all life faces extinction if we don't change our ways. We can't go on business as usual.
No scientist on the face of this Earth is claiming humans are going extinct.
@@anthonymorris5084 my friend, you’re already paying for internet. they won’t charge you extra to just use google.
Yes...and socialism is the answer! Or at least when you clear away the nonsense, that's always the bottom line.
@@markanthony3275 Nope, not any scientist with an ounce of credibility. The doomsday rhetoric stems solely from the climate movement, which you've just proven once again is the domain of the Left and nothing more than an attempt to undermine capitalism in the guise of saving the planet.
Socialism has never produced a thriving economy anywhere in the world, at any time in history, managed by anybody. It is a proven abject failure and leaves a swath of destruction everywhere it's been tried, so good luck with that.
@@markanthony3275 oh yeah cause capitalism is just working out SO well for the millions of people living in poverty and the planet that's currently burning up....like do you have rocks for brains or?
There is a theory that requires further study. The removal of oil from the subsurface is largely responsible for man-induced climate change, possibly exceeding what we already understand about the effects of burning it off into the atmosphere.
Oil acts as a cooling barrier between the earth’s molten core a the surface, similar to how antifreeze and oil protects your engine from overheating. Remove it and your engine quickly overheats. Many thousands of oil wells all around the planet have been removing oil for over 100 years, so it stands to reason that there would be ramifications since it was previously intact for millions of years.
Wouldnt it get cooler? I mean we remove the warm oil and the space where it was gets taken up by water which is cooler than the oil?
@@0topon The earth’s core is much hotter than water at even the greatest depths of the ocean, as evidenced by molten lava.
@@pl1532 Oil gets nowhere near molten lava
Increasing population is the main culprit of all our challenges facing today.
Its actually countries with unsustainable levels of consumption per capita, there are others with large populations who hardly contribute to global emissions. Of course though,a growing population does not help, but its not the main issue. Our economic system and culture in the West predominantly needs to change but too many vested interests to keep it going, greed and ignorance until the end it seems.
Mostly in combination with increase of consumption in the formerly poor countries, which also makes the wealthier countries refuse to cut down more aggressively.
@@NoidoDevblaming the poor does not solve a problem caused by the rich
Exploding population (360,000 newborns/day) AND unsustainable overconsumption of natural resources.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago -
I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010.
Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us one thousand years to the past of the universe.
Today April 10, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 84 thousand years ago.
On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past.
On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million in the past.
On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past.
On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past.
Mohamed BOUHAMIDA.
90% of the energy has been absorbed to oceans... How many percents will remain in the atmosphere due to this event alone?
Don't forget, the melting ice is absorbing 80 times as much heat energy PER GRAM on its way to becoming liquid, so less ice, far more heated water in a feed forward cycle to the extinction of life on this planet, the only one we have to survive on. CONTRACEPTION.
Humans are definitely the a failed experiment 😂😂😂
Not an experiment and not failed yet. Some, if not most, will survive somehow.
Don't Look Up
This is absolutely horrifying. I am terrified of what might come this summer in the north east of the United States.
The North East weather wise hasnt been all that extreme. Its the West Coast and Gulf Coast Ststes suffering extremes.
yeah ,maybe some will care when their fishing industries gets effected.. we are guilty for this, not el nino, they have even been waiting for it, due to the long period with el nina.. the acidity isn't something new, (not when it have been known), and coral bleaching is probably a smaller problem, when even the animals with exoskeletons are effected by and from it..
it is alarming, mostly because we in the bigger type of normal climate picture, are towards colder climate, but it still rises, and we almost get heat records every year, even when we had el nina.. so what did they expect would happen?
We're doomed.
"Is there intelligent life on earth?"
Good question, ehh?
Urgent action needs to be taken and we've learned that we can not rely on individual decisions and good will. We need to demand our governments urgent laws and measures to mitigate this mess.
Recomended Video: Doomer Dr. Eliot Jacobson talks sudden ocean temperature rise, viral chart tweet, 'Big Green Lie'
Mankind don't care.
We care about killing,
Sex, drugs, food, our family, our jobs. Money,, etc......
What happened the last time the Beaufort Gyre broke?
I had a dream last night that the ocean was starting to simmer like it would before boiling.
It won’t get THAT hot.
But it might kill off corals and other sea life :(.
Steamed clams 👍
Accept your shamanic awareness and help push the system into balance
@@margin606 I prefer steamed hams
Mmmm steamed hams.
I googled it. Apparently the ocean would need to be 185°F to simmer. We'd be long gone before it ever got there though.
The journalist said "the iceans go through cycles of hearing and cooling"… That’s wrong! oceans go through ciffereng circulations patterns, but the amount of energy is increasing.
Green Energy Tech is up to the task to mitigate the environmental impact of Global Warming. The question is can we deploy the tech in mass quickly enough?
Green energy tech is not about saving the planet. It is about saving modern global industrial civilization.
Get prepared ! 🥸
Anything about the volcanos affecting the temperatures? No, of course not, it's all about "human" climate change. The many volcanos that have erupted have nothing to do with any of it.
The current era volcanoes are trivial. If you don't have an area of land as big as a medium-size nation completely uninhabitable because it's under hundreds of metres of molten lava, you're not experiencing an era of heightened vulcanism and you can't blame volcanoes for your problems.
With satellite carbon tracking we can even measure how much carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are being released by each volcano. But you'd know that if you did your reading.
As the climate heads into greater extremes globally, how can we best deal with future climate crises?
The short answer is that we cannot deal with them unless we take care of nature's inner balance.
We live in a tightly-closed and interdependent system in which everything boomerangs back to us. While living in such a system, we need to reconsider what we want and think, and how we treat each other, because our human connections are the primary influence on how nature responds to us.
It is common to think that climate is dependent on factors outside of us-whether it be balances between heat and cold in the environment, or the effects of various kinds of pollution we emit-because we lack a complete picture of how our attitudes to each other bring about the strongest responses from nature toward us.
No creature distorts nature the way that we people do. And it is not simply a matter of switching to renewable energy sources, electric cars and the like; it is a matter of how we relate to each other.
If we truly wish to witness more balance throughout nature and not have to deal with all kinds of cold waves and other natural disasters, then similarly to how we have electricity, water and gas meters in our homes, we should also have meters that count how much evil we emit into the world from our negative attitudes to each other. What I mean is that if we could feel the extent to which we emit negative forces into the world, which negatively ricochet back to us, then we would wish to change this negative driver within us. We would want to switch it to a drive that makes our human connections positive, and which harmonizes us with nature.
In simple terms, when we get up in the morning, we should first and foremost consider what we need to do in order for all people to have it good. Developing such an attitude is not so simple, yet we will need to seriously work on it as we head into the future. A life of increasing blows from nature or a life of peace and harmony depends on the extent to which we impact a shift in our attitudes to each other-from negative to positive.
BS.
Only one solution at this late juncture: CONTRACEPTION and WILLFUL PERSONAL INDIVIDUAL REDUCTION IN CARBON FOOTPRINT.
It's very easy to find evidence of goodness in one's thoughts. It's much harder to translate that into action. Such as composting your own poo so you aren't polluting, growing your own food organically, digging up your lawn and replacing it with pollinator gardens. That all shows much more kindness to life and is much more impactful than positive thoughts. But it requires a lot of time and labor. Most people aren't willing to do it.
Great comment! I ran an organic sheep and vegetable farm in upstate NY until job loss forced me to give-up and move. I have always raised organic veg's in home gardens where-ever I've lived, and community gardens as I now live in an apt. and am retired. I burn, on ave., 5 gals of gas a month and live in a 500sq ft one rm apt. and recommend all of us reducing our carbon footprints every day on RUclips feeds. But, you are absolutely correct in pointing out the old adage: actions speak louder than words.@@everythingmatters6308
@@everythingmatters6308 True 🙏
We can soon rename the Earth, Venus 2.0....
Humans probably existed there first.
We always say: Bring criminals to Justice and give victim’s family Justice.
It can also be applied on human beings: Nature will bring human beings to Justice for the criminal we committed to this planet!
Surface temp . Go down a inch of two , still chilly.
August will still be the warmest time of the year for the oceans it's just they're going to be so warm that .... wait a minute.... don't look up..
😢
We're screwed.
X-Files
Humans vs. Alien Vampires
For a rich man to solve the climate crisis...is like trying to drive a camel through the eye of a needle. Because vampires (greed) are blind and cannot see the ignorance of destroying the planet.
Easier for a rich man to crawl through the eye of a needle than it is for a camel to enter heaven.
Got an ev and solar? No. Get on it. The heat no care about your Excuses.
why dont we make a gigantic solar panal in the ocean. a giganic solar panal with wind catchers as well. you could anchor it down so you could capture the energy of the waves too. basically a gigantic bowl with wind mills on it and water wheels on it. Or instead of a bowl make it an incredibly massive durable and hollow solar sphere. so its always floating. anchor it down so it cant move too much and boom. free energy
We dont do that because it its far easier und cheaper to install solar panels on land
It's 25.4C today
This positive factor for hurricane will be offset by wind sheer due to El Nino. So, expect a average hurricane season.
Maybe your hypotheses is correct. Maybe not. Since we are in "uncharted territory", it is too soon to make any predictions.
The range of ocean temperatures from the 80s to present day. Has been about 18.6-24.9 depending on what month you are in. fluctuation of a month averages about 1 degrees throughout the months of all years. And considering the data is incomplete as we have no idea what temperatures were pre the 20th century, nor the fluctuations.
Just saying anyone who can admit that the currents life in the ocean has been around for a very, very long time, and we have a needle of data out of a mountain of hay. There is absolutely zero proof a few degrees is bad. I just don't buy the alarmism, I just don't.
This is horrifying.
I’m glad to be traveling and seeing nature now.
It sounds as if things are going to be dire sooner rather than later.
Not true. Temps are not rising...and polar ice is not melting , it's actually increasing. Up where I live, there are more polar bears than ever.
Where do you live?
@@0topon Churchill , Manitoba, Canada.
@@markanthony3275 According to "The Guardian" the bear population has dropped by nearly 30% since 1987, "Firstpost" says that in Canada’s Western Hudson Bay the population has fallen from 842 in 2016 to 618 in 2022.
@@0topon My sources are the Inuit that live there and hunt there...who is the Guardian's source? Another thing about the Arctic that they get wrong is this notion that the Arctic must be covered in thick multi-year ice. If that happened the polar bears would go extinct...because polar bears feed on seals, seals feed on fish, fish feed on plankton, and plankton need sunlight in order for photosynthesis to work...no open water means no sunlight, no sunlight means no plankton, no plankton means no fish, no fish means no seals...and no seals means no polar bears. They get the bear population wrong too. Because of over hunting the polar bear population was at an all-time low in 1970 of just over 500 bears. Then they put a hunting moratorium in place...the current population is over 5000 today. I wouldn't trust the Guardian to get the weather right. You probably are unaware that in the 1940's a Canadian RCMP vessel called the St. Roch made a two way passage through the Arctic in one season...it has a wooden hull. Today you can't make the same trip without the help of a steel hulled ice breaker...what does that tell you? There is more ice today that there was in the 1940's. The St. Roch is in a museum in British Columbia, Canada. Much earlier in the 20th century polar explorer Admunsen made a complete one way passage in a dinky little ship with a 10 horsepower motor...how much ice was present then? A lot less than there is today. Always compare what is said by the historical record...and in this case, the record proves the Guardian wrong.
First comment was about fishermen, not about the fish.
Why aren't we fixing this issue?!
There is no fixing this issue
Becouse of the greed of the elites
Because of our willful ignorance as INDIVIDUALS and OUR HUGE CARBON FOOTPRINTS.
Yea well baltic sea didn't warm up until last week. Late fishing season
The problem is so serious world
Wide that you should shut down
All schools for one entire year
And get the students to plant
Trees , and protect and water them too . sacrifice for a better
Future . Have forest reserves .
Wasf ya know. The dust doesn't do much.
Yeah we are. 😕
that geoengineering is too fast for me.
Yes, but lets not worry about Fukushima's radioactive water constantly flowing into the ocean.
Ok. Done
Alright
And , yu want a whole ecosystem of things to have the ability to figure out which mosquitos have malaria and the ability to precision drive them to specific targets? .
Soll sich die NATO doch drum kümmern. Einfach auf die Temperaturen schiessen...
Off the coast of Texas ??? Texas does not have an Atlantic Coast.
The gulf (of mexico) your state borders on is part of the atlantic ocean.
@@daineminton9687 the Atlantic Ocean is the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico is the Gulf of Mexico. Two separate bodies of water.
@@RRStout I would like encourage you to pick some geography books and make an earnest attempt at study. IDK what conditions in the education environment aided in your opinion. I hope you learn & perhaps help others who are mislead as well.
At first I thought of like cloth or floating ball mats with holes so fish can maybe fall back in, but then to some kinda large flipper to move water, but now I am thinking of fish tank water filters, specifically movement of air. Idk on them wind turbines, as it takes too many years, but how much would it cost to put tubing, and what size tubing would work to move air, say, off the coasts of Texas, maybe the West and East coasts as well? Is the benefits of having them off more northern parts of the coast, say even in Alaska, a very good thing to keep how ocean water being cool then gradually getting warm as it goes down the West coast a very good idea to keep that system healthy by keeping it somewhat close to the past ?
Of course these are all in supplement to hopefully producing less greenhouse gases, as well as storing them.
Have the dead fish been collected off the Texas coast to make fertilizer?
But hm in solar air pump, and small vs larger bubbles. And pumps going across might sound ok, but idk if something covers them. So maybe larger bubbles, or are they too disruptive and no not exchange oxygen as well as if there were smaller ones.
It's awesome living through the change from the fuckaroundacine into the findoutacine
We use technology to survive and it's that technology that will cause our demise.
BE PREPARED.
too much yada yada
1 sentence > ELE
Fabulous thread! Many great thoughtful and informative comments and replies. This is what the internet could have been, before the corporate overlords took it over for the single purpose of higher profits. We are our own worse enemy, well, at least the richest among us.
Die chatGPT....😎
Maybe the Mid Atlantic Rift is opening and boiling some water
It's been steady-state for millennia. As have all the other natural systems that maintained earth's temperature before we started pumping masses of fossil carbon into the atmosphere.
Its an El Nino year.
And since successive El Nino years show a steep upward temp trend, are you claiming everything is OK?
@@scottekoontz this is the first El Nino year we've had in a while. The ocean has been cooler for several years.
@@Wolfcamp555 Yes, the oceans have been VERY warm for La Nina years. They have not been cool. Are you guys reading even the first paragraph of ANY reports?
I guess there is a new definition of "cooler" for you guys.
"The last El Niño event occurred between February and August 2019 and was quite weak. Between July 2020 and March 2023, a rare triple-dip La Niña suppressed rising global temperatures. El Niño events normally last somewhere between nine months and two years but can be longer." - Live Science
Looking across many El Niño events we see a bumpy but upward trend for their peak temperatures similar to what we see for other years.
@@cloudpoint0 I prefer. El Nino in my part of the world
More scare tactics
Exactly how is Coal, NG safer than Nuclear?
The worst thing the environmental movement ever did was oppose nuclear.
Give me strength 🙄
Look up to heaven, where our salvation comes from. Jesus Christ has warned us that the last days will be plagued with so much disasters that people will curse God. Humble your hearts, stop staring into your phones and open the book of Life aka Holy Bible. The Lord Jesus Is, and coming soon. All who belive should get excited! His coming is near
Bye bye humans, soon youll be gone.
You don't need to run it in.
20XX macross or robotec Gforce underwater sub😩
Why do you think it's catastrophic there will be warm water fish later and nature will adjust everything is new what your not used to like one rainforest is taken down but in it expands because it's necessary for plants to survive rest of the dead planets are just example how people couldn't stick with growing plants
You really need to learn about punctuation. That comment looks like one long sentence which is unintelligible.
i read new record tempatures :)
I listen to them on audio.
The north east Atlantic is warmer than average. The north west Atlantic is colder (but they don't mention that).
Because it's not relevant or also a bad development.
@NoidoDev This is just weather. There is no evidence that we are enduring a global climate catastrophe.
I challenge the expert's statement that wind normally does measurable mixing into the "deep ocean" (which is below 700 m) from the permanent thermocline above. It's my understand that the wind mixes only to 200 m depth and below that it's mostly the dense water around Antarctica, which of course lifts the ~entire ocean (except polar and some sub-polar) by a regular 1.9 m (6.3 feet) per year each and every year by shoving under it as a wedge and lifting the ocean (trivial calculation).
I'm a lot more worried about glyphosate runoff into the Gulf of Mexico, and neonic pesticides killing bees.
Same problem and same cause: TOO MANY HUMANS USING TOO MANY NATURAL RESOURCES AND PRODUCING TOO MUCH POLLUTION, INCLUDING GLOBAL HEATING.
or why dont we send a huge version of the new telescopes temperature control out into space so we can block the son sometimes
I wonder how is it possible dust transport has been reduced as global warming has rised wind force/speed. By checking PM (both 2.5 and 10 um) on Earth Null School it is very noticeable the rise of them along last years. (?)
Not true
The recorded global temperature for previous years:
2015 average: 0.98 °F (0.54 °C) below normal
2016 average: 0.48 °F (0.27 °C) below normal
2017 average: 0.47 °F (0.26 °C) below normal
2018 average: 1.33 °F (0.74 °C) below normal
2019 average: 0.65 °F (0.36 °C) below normal
2020 average: 0.00 °F (0.00 °C) below normal
2021 average: 0.20 °F (0.11 °C) below normal
2022 average: 0.47 °F (0.26 °C) below normal
Name one creature that absolutely realize on plankton in the ocean?
Hint: it's reading this post right now.
Alex like green ones going to get to live up to its name and Iceland's going to have to change its name 📛
On the bright side, Greenland won't need to.
I still want to try nuking a hurricane.
I think hurricanes are fueled by heat
Go for it. While you're still young.
Just for the fun of it.
All a scam 💯🤬
😮😮😮
Are we getting closer to the sun? Has anyone notice the bushes and shrubs/grass is burned off or dehydrated even tho it's been raining through out the year
In the northern hemisphere we're actually more than 3% further from the sun in summer.
Earth is slowly, very slowing getting further from the sun. Solar irradiation is slightly lower now than decades ago.
Let's see: Further from the sun, less irradiation from the sun, but warming. Whatever could it be that is warming the earth? I hope someone looks into this.
@scottekoontz my problem is it's 73 degrees outside, but all the grass/bushes/shrubs look brown and burnt. No new growth. And for some reason, outside seems brighter? Everywhere I go is the same. The sun burns....but it's 73 degrees
Aaron, we are actually in a warm spike of an ice age. The only thing guaranteed is change. Get on with enjoying your life.
@lynneades4632 you know something is happening where we have no future. It's different outside, everyone knows it, and the only things I notice, is the brightness of the sunlight, the browning of grasses/bushes, and the sun's rays burn stronger in 70 degree weather. And if we are moving closer, why would our world leaders tell us? That mass panic, there's nothing we can do.
Fear porn. Nature simply isn't that fragile.