Reporters around the world: "Scientist, can you explain to everyone why X weather event happened?" Scientists around the world: "You continue to ignore us, THAT'S what's happening." This conversation is futile.
Also the folks worried about profit over the next 3 months: "We can't afford to preserve the environment for the next generations, we have profits to make!"
@@inyobill This reminds me of an interview I read in a French business magazine. The CEO of a ski lift company, building new tourism infrastructure in a small village near Annecy, was asked how they would deal with the predicted lack of snow in a few decades. He replied candidly that they had taken climate predicitons into account, and would have made their full return on investment and profits by then. His answer is exemplary for the prevailing discourse in much of the business world.
@8fledermaus8 All these are done by the X-men gangs. They are using superpowers to battle each other. Their activity increases solar radiation and they generate haze or cloud cover using strange magical powers. Try watching Marvey's X men series, and the truth of the current global situation. 🤣
But. But.... But... We are human. We need to do everything that we are Human are doing. We.... We need to be human. We need to keep on doing what everyday modern day human are doing. We.. We build.. and it collapse... and we build it again... and ....and it collapsed again.... and we build.... we....... We farm... yeah we farm... we make foods... yes we made foods.... we created biggest canned foods and soda drinks all over the world... we... we need to eat... we need to drink... we... we need to sell our foods in those restaurants to serve travellers.....we... we... we are making so much money on tourism... we... we cannot stop... we must do it... we need to keep on doing it... we.... we.... we are not scientist but indeed we... we are just bussinessmen trying to be come richer and richer... we.... we are modern day human... we... we... we dont plant tree... we plant foods all over the world... we.... we... well we.... we made so much money on those foods and drinks transportations.... we... we created uber eat... we... we created grab bike.... we... we created so much food delivery online platform trying to keep those human stop worrying about "Climate change".... we... we.... we just you know... we must travel... we must be able to travel.... we.... you know... working 365 days... no.... our jobs is really really stressful... we need to travel somewhere else because we all got sick of our everyday life inside those cities and countries.... we... we... yeah.. we want to see the world.... we... we..... we must travel to find new products from some other countries to bring it back to our countries to start some bussiness to make money...we...we.... yeah we just cannot those trades.... we.... we... those trades are most important to us before anythinh else.... we... just cannot stop traveling around.... we...we...we... we do not care if this planet will be on fire tomorrow.....we...we...we will fly to the moon or maybe build new cities on mars....dont worry.... we...we... are fine... the planet is not....
I wanted to add that warming oceans means the creation of hurricanes. Sweden has had a weird storm weather all summer which never happened before. I think we should prepare us more against the storms that are coming.
Have we? In what region? I’m a Swede too but have not experienced that. Only recently there seems to be flash flooding though. Those seems crazy though and out of place.
We have known for 60 years whats coming and what to do about it. I do not understand why journalists keep asking the same questions, the answers have been there for decades. The right questions would be: "We are not stopping pumping CO2 into the atmossphere and we wont stop until all the oil is used up. What do we have to do in order to live on a world with at least 5 degrees Celcius more? How do we survive?"
The carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are actually beneficial. Benefits include increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia. Both the current mean surface temperature of Earth and the current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are suboptimal for plant growth. The main regulators of climate are Milankovitch cycles, continental drift and stellar evolution of the sun. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration has only a minor effect on this planet which has 70% deep surface oceans.
Actually, it is closer to 40 years. In the 80s, there was a huge move in Congress in the US to address climate change before it got too bad. Unfortunately, the oil companies had a different opinion.
@@josephsalomoneActually the oil companies think the same, but the possible profit from drilling around arctic area obviously overcome the risk of their portfolio.
@@faarsight Yes and no. There have been climate studies, noting climate change since the 1910s, but the vast majority of carbon emissions causing the temperature increase occurred after the 1950s.
@@josephsalomoneand thats worrying, as it could mean that the smaller amounts in previous years has set this in motion and as you correctly observed the massive ramp up in emissions in the last 20 to 30 years and no sign of emissions reducing anytime soon, if at all does not bode well. We are in uncharted territory now well outside the small window in which mankind has existed in the last 300,000 years. It will be interesting to see what happens with the hurricane season.
@@niedas3426 Well you have clearly gone for worst case scenario. And taken it out of context no doubt And even with that there are things that can still be attempted for mitigation. Even if that cant fix everything. You can sit on the floor and cry if you want, but how about you not discourage others in the process.
Reports, "How could this be happening?" Most scientist are too polite, they refer to previous predictions. If it was any ordinary person what you would here is "I TOLD YOU SO!"
Both the current mean surface temperature of Earth and the current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are suboptimal. Warming has the net beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia. Cooling (eg nuclear winter, asteroid impact) would have the detrimental effects of crop failures and famine, increased winter heating costs and more deaths from hypothermia.
@@johngeier8692 Those increased agricultural yeilds make it less nutritious, more empty calories from the carbon. Its diluting the nutritional potency of food, lesser micronutrients and minerals per gram.
Growing up around the Oregon coast. I cannot imagine what 100°f ocean water temps would being like? That sounds like a nightmare to the ecosystem. I really hope we actually start doing something now because we are already so far behind..
There was a a tipping point, i believe we passed it last year. That was the point where we could put the brakes on it, and have some success in turning it around. Now every warm day exacerbates every other warm day. The hots arent cooling, and making the hots hotter, until no cooling will be enough. Its both interesting and terrifying.
@@dan5956 i agree. It's definitely too late but it still baffles me that we can clearly see that it's too late and yet we aren't even trying to do anything to help make it less worse than it already will be.. we shouldn't just do nothing. We should have done way more a long time ago but i really feel like after people got mass trauma from the early learning era of nuclear energy having some bumpy moments.. it just created the perfect situation for the rich companies to keep their power in the energy department around the world.. i just wish people could give modern advanced nuclear energy options a chance now that we have learned so much and advanced so much in so many ways. Technology has improved a ton, material science, understanding radiation, safety measures, engineering, ROV/robotics, the list goes on. It all can help us greatly improve our electrical grid system and our emissions we produce. Also giving countries energy independence and it could connect with alternative energy options as well.
@@benmcreynolds8581 I'm 32-year-old, super climate aware, but I personally have given up. Got sterilized at the age of 30 as I didn't want to give a slight chance to my non-existing kid to suffer what's ahead of us
Very simplistic explenation of what needs to ve done. Reducing co2 emisions and planting some trees won't change a thing in this domino falling system. We should talk about changing the economic system, consuming less, adopt a profound interest for developing nature and biodiversity and reducing the human activity. The curent economic system based on infinit growth and consumtion is unsustaineble
At this point it is indeed futile, we should still do it but for other reasons - restoring ecological areas / ecosystems. But we should be under no illusion that right now it does very little for climate change.
@@tombox2759 I suppose so, it is like trying to put out a raging house fire with a single glass of water. Releasing the equivalent of tens of millions of tons of trapped CO2 built up over tens of millions of years of organic matter decay requires massive changes. The burning of fossil fuels is akin to the world being on fire 24/7.
@@__Wanderer global ban on coal burning is about the only option left that might change anything... But that is never going to happen. China is building dozen new coal burning plants this year alone... So, i'm not at all optimistic about humanys chance to survive this. Maybe it is for the better.. We have been one of the most destructive things to happen to this planet in the last 60 million years and that's saying something!
I know what you mean. Many of us plant trees wherever we can, dozens, hundreds, thousands, one person wrote in a comment section last week that he's planted a total of 250,000 so far. But it all feels so futile now when millions of trees are being burned in widespread wildfires 'every year' - the vast majority of them being full size mature trees, decades, hundreds of years old, while our modern contributions are little more than tiny saplings (which can take as long as 15 years to offset the carbon footprint in their production). The first tree I planted has been in the ground only 40 years, and is still nowhere near maturity, and due to the increased strength and frequency in storms I've had to change strategy and plant smaller trees instead. Even if we could plant the same number of trees lost each year, we can't replace the same 'mass' of readily carbon-storing trees.
Can confirm! Was just in Panama City Beach, FL and was shocked to feel the water around me SO HOT. The fish don’t like it- they were cooling under the boat shade. It wasn’t just bath water warm, there were currents of jacuzzi around me 🤿
Arrhenius who described the greenhouse effect in the late 19th century opined that carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels would have the beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields and postponement of the next glacial maximum. You can add reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia. The main regulators of climate are Milankovitch cycles, continental drift and stellar evolution of the sun. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration only has a small effect on climate on this planet which has 70% deep surface oceans.
@@johngeier8692 CO2 has the effect of being the lever that changes many other things. So while it itself, isn't that bad, the things it levers into happening have outsized consequences. So tell me what happens when the oceans don't mix and we have stratification?
@@johngeier8692 😂 Ok. Nah, pulling 100s of billions of tons of carbon, locked away underground for millions of years, and putting it in to our paper thin atmosphere over the course of a couple centuries (most in the last few decades) won't have ANY impact on the chemistry of the atmosphere or the oceans, nor disrupt an ecological balance that took from millennia to much much longer to come in to its current balance.
The very deep ocean temperature should also be of concern, because of the giant reservoirs of methane that are kept in place by the combination of very high pressure and very low temperature
Those extra warm tropical waters will make hurricanes more powerful. That means category 4 and 5 hurricanes will be more common along the US east coast.
Every day a new story about environmental problems. Every day a new story about life-saving solutions. How long will we go around in circles?🤔🤔🤔 As long as the human population grows and countries lead individual policies, I see no way out. 😥😥😟😟
I see 😢 countries must hv prioritised on enviromental issues. Profits for earth, ecosistem. Like we took fishes from sea, it must return in same, sea life heals, we heals. Leaders must cooperates also transparancy public.
How many decades will you continue to believe these lies, that pantheists like Al Gore and other Earth-worshippers keep saying every 10 years that we only have 10 years to live, yet another 10 years goes by and we're just fine, and yet another decade goes by and we're still alive, and so on and so forth. How long will you continue to allow these charlatans to deceive you for their financial gain and to fund their false religion of pantheism?
I am pessimistic. People in a war torn country when the husband had a brief holiday to catch up, they have a kid. Come on. People don’t think it seems even in war situations, they won’t think in this slow death situation. I don’t have kids.it’s my contribution to this world
I agree, no point in reporting this, all these reports do is try frighten people just for views, the news people won't report good news, they only interested in any negative stuff they can find
At least the boomers don't have to worry. At least while they are alive, most of their seashore mansions will be safe. Which is why many of them live true to the motto "apres moi le deluge".
@@maythesciencebewithyou yeah, I'm a boomer here in S Floridah...back in April we had over 20inchs of rainfall within hours.. Shut down everything...I mean everything...now the insurance industry is leaving the state...not only for homes but for cars... They know the big one is coming soon
@@theeraphatsunthornwit6266 I'll explain it like you're 5 years old. From 34ºC onwards, oxygen stops feeling at home and goes away.... I'm glad you talk about raising fish, I have the fish that like hot water the most and nobody in the world has aquariums above 32ºC with the discus. If you don't understand the subject, research first before commenting.
@@starlightHT Aquarium? That word is too advanced for a 5 years old. But well, that is besides the point. Have you ever seen a graph between oxygen solubility in water and temperature? At 40 celcius , oxygen solubility is still as high as 6 mg per litre, sufficent for fish, or otherwise fish wont thrive in tropical climate, as well as coral reef.
I just checked a physics calculator. The change from 18° to 38° means the water volume is 0.5% higher. And since there is no space but in one direction the water level is rising ... just by heat. Now 0.5% sounds not much, but imagine that for ocean-amounts of water.
I live in South Florida and it looks s too hot to go in the water to swim and something is has to be done..like yesterday. If this continues the marine life will do off. I kept tropical fish and know even a few degrees change matter, usually when there is a increase it may promote breeding..but this is way too much.
All I can see are larger hurricanes and flooding in FL. Then watch as more insurance companies start pulling out of coverage or pulling out all together from the state.
@@kl3nd4thu Yes. Gotta love insurance companies. They are supposed to protect people from disasters but they only like to collect more and more free money. They make HUGE profits throughout the world but whine if they ever have to pay out
I live on the west coast at least a thousand, maybe two thousand kilometers north of you in Canada. We have a similar problem here. We had some rain overnight, the first in months, and it wasn't much. There are approximately 400 forest fires of various sizes burning in this province alone. Most of us live in the SW corner of the province and are hardly aware of what is happening, and how bad it is. So I fully understand your concern about the unusual weather everyone seems to be having everywhere.
@@shirlp6046, that's the dumbest thing I've heard all day, why are none of the climate scientists around the world attributing these events to the pole shift then? You must be smarter than them all I guess, you heard of the Dunning Kruger effect?
@@tellyboy17 Sea surface temperature is measured by scientists who deploy temperature sensors on satellites, buoys, ships, ocean reference stations, and through marine telemetry. It’s the average temperature of the uppermost meter of the ocean over wide areas of the ocean.
Thanks for reporting on this. One of the things warming the Atlantic right now is the lack of Saharan dust that normally blows over the sea, shielding it from some of the solar energy that reaches the surface. But I haven’t heard much discussion of WHY the Saharan winds are behaving differently. It seems like it must fit into the climate situation - it’d be interesting to hear some discussion on that topic. How likely is this to be an annual occurrence? How much additional ocean heat absorption will result, and how much higher will temperatures go?
And apparently because a lack of extra toxic shipping trails, amount of sulfur dioxide above the oceans is less since they had to switch to cleaner fuel, they noticed something similar on 9=11 when the planes in the US were grounded for 3 days temperature shot up as well with the lack of contrails.
@@koyaanisqatsi78 thank you, I was searching for this. Carbon is not the only factor on temperature. Air clarity because of dust, clouds and Sulphur are huge factors
another reason is the sudden lack of ship tracks which were probably seeding clouds. google ship tracks from space --oop somone else said this, but i want to leaev my comment here to urge others to look into the issue.
@@JasperKlijndijkYeah less heat reaches the surface but that means we actually got a huge problem... as the carbon changes the heat exchange rate of the atmos, so actually cleaning up the air would result in more heat reaching the surface but also more heat being retained in the system.. ach ja
It feels like the messaging at this point needs to be: "We need to start shutting down all production that emits excessive carbon or we are all going to die. " Followed by "Rolling blackouts are being initiated worldwide to reduce carbon emissions. A new policy banning personal use of ICE vehicles on consecutive days has been passed and will be enforced with 30 days in jail for all violators. " Followed by "A 1000% worldwide tax on all petroleum products has been passed." Followed by "A worldwide draft of workers for renewable power solutions and farming has been implemented with mandatory participation. Those who fail to comply will be shot on sight." Sooner or later. Either that or just everyone will burn and starve to death while those in power do nothing.
Shutting down all frivolous production should have happened 30 years ago to save the biosphere. It’s too late now though. We’re at 1.2 degrees now and we have about 1 degree hiding under the Aerosol Masking Effect. So if we shut everything down we jump to 2+ degrees QUICKLY. And that accelerates all tipping points. The environmental apocalypse can not be stopped at this point.
@@winterlinde5395 The top scientists have told us that will have 7 yrs to cut co2 by 50% and 28 yrs to reach zero if we are to have “any hope” in preventing apocalyptic scenarios and a great extinction. Accepting reality is not giving up. Denying reality is not helpful to anyone. Some of the realities that stop us from achieving climate goals. 1- The republican and/or religious mind set is that the current global warming is a natural cycle. 2- Corporate greed, Wall Street and free markets, and nations wanting to boost economies through mining and manufacturing. 3- The democrats who are pushing for a boom in green energy on a global scale through mining and manufacturing. (Preventing the 50% in 7 yrs thus counterproductive). 4- Environmentalists who would rather watch the 6th extinction unfold than to give up their bacon cheeseburger. 5- The people who are wrong in thinking our consumer driven, gadget buying, cellphone using, video game playing, new tv, meat, dairy, and egg society are ok if only we powered the destruction of Earths Biosphere through solar and wind. Disaster. 6- The tipping points that we can not stop. The biggest reality of them all. Rain forest, Thwaites Glacier, Permafrost, Boreal Forest, rapid species extinction, sea level rise, Aerosol Masking, and everything about the ocean including the upcoming Blue Ocean Event, the AMOC failing. the ice caps, etc 7- These tipping points are all happening at once and will lead to ‘isostatic Rebound’ followed by the volcanism and earthquakes that isostatic Rebound creates. I’ll listen to anyone who can tell me how to ‘realistically’ change any of those things. The only good news is it might not be too late to slow it down and buy us a decade, but it is much too late to stop it. We dwindled almost every species population down so low that they don’t stand a chance. We can also take some steps to lesson the painful misery for humans as they die off from mass famine, disease, and war. I’m open to any solutions.
Actually, the conservatives know this is a problem, but they don't think they'll be around to suffer the consequences and more importantly, they're getting paid handsomely for lying about it and continuing stuff like giving permits for fossil fuel production.
@@jewiesnew3786 yeah, that's the level they're thinking at. They'll be telling us all to move to Antarctica in 50 years. And they still won't admit there's a problem.
And no one seems to care. Open your window and look upon the streets. Life goes on for now. I predict water will be so scarce that its value will be greater than gold. Almost all marine life will perish and many people too. But as long as we can drive our cars and eat our cheeseburgers, all is well, I'm told.
Nothing is going to perish. Fish species are millions of years old. Just 10,000 years ago the Earth was an ice ball, the oceans were vastly lower, much more salty and a lot more frigid. Whales in the Arctic migrate to the Sea of Cortez every year. Sharks are known to swim from Miami Beach to New York. They live in the North Atlantic and the Caribbean. Temps change dramatically just from winter to summer, nothing dies.
Lost of sea ice in the Arctic means a positive feedback. Less ice means faster warming, which means less ice. When we reach the "Big Burp" (permafrost rapid methane release event), it will be irreversible.
Plus the wild fires - this outlandish fire season in Canada released 2-3 times as much carbon as the whole Canadian Nation combined, transport, industry, agriculture, energy infrastructure, everything. We are in a dire spot for sure. Mitigating the effects of the climate catastrophy alone is a monumental task for our societies.
The siberian tundras are already belching large bubbles of methane gas and leaving huge craters behind. Google "Siberia methane craters" to see awesome holes that keep appearing at continually increasing rate. It may not be "when we reach it" but "is it already here"....
Not to mention the CO2 and other emissions from sudden massive ocean die-off. Add to that increased heat absorption from terrestrial exposure due to glacial melt and we have ourselves an autocatalytic cycle which we can neither reverse nor stop, only hope to slow a little bit.
"Learn a lesson from the fig tree. When its branch becomes tender and sprouts leaves, you know that summer is near. In the same way, when you see all these things, know that he is near, at the gates. Amen, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." from the Gospel of Matthew
Wait a minute, you are claiming climate change was widely known and approved in 1953? Are you sure about that number because it absolutely was not widely accepted opinion. There may have been evidence by some scientist but claiming there has been wide front fighting against the climate change for 70 years is just pure lie. I could accept 40 years... Modern day wider public enviromentalism started some 30 years ago, before that it was considered a hoodoo from hippie scientists.
@@guesswho6038 The first scientific warnings about climate change and the destruction of nature date back to the 1950s. There is plenty of films by Prof. Grzimek, Jacques Custeau and others on the subject of nature alone. I'm pretty sure you are one of the inventors of ignorance, or at least its foremost disciple. First warning of climate change was published 1941 by Hermann Flohn.
@@alaric_ it was known in the 1950’s. It’s what led to Exxon's research from the late1970’s which forecasted the globe would warm by around 0.2 degrees Celsius every decade. Which it has. Is it widely accepted today. Not at all. And today’s folk who do accept it do not understand it or how grave the near immediate future is.
Good Job, DW Yes, water temperature has impact on dissolved gasses. The resultant condition is to be observed. Fishes needs to swim shallow, and go polar cooler water. Does that create Ocean Desert 🏜? Scary. 😢
@jzsbff4801 Good info for adaptation. In Pacific rim, SUPER TYPHOON create huge CLOUD COVER over a vast region. This reduce GROUND LEVEL heat, and SEA WATER temperatures. And it created a lot of rain 🌧, Red China & Pacific rim is lucky compared to the troubles in EU & Moslem crescent. EL NINO somehow got defeated by the typhoons. Let's watch on and be ready with adaptation strategies. 🥹
The world is going to die in a global sauna because the top three polluters refuse to do anything about the issue. Handfull of small countries are strangling themselves with literally zero effect on global emissions in the futile hopes that someone might take notice of their sacrifice and join in the difficult decisions..... In vain. When the world finally ignites and starts to burn, at least few clean countries can say proudly "we told you so" before the humanity, as we know it, dies off.
Climate change woundn't end human civilisation it would make the planet a lot worse in some aspects but yeah there are few things able to end human civilisation
If the ocean warms enough, then methane hydrate on the continental shelves can rise into the atmosphere, further increasing the overall greenhouse effect
The Laptev Ocean in Siberia contains enormous amounts of methane ice. When that starts to melt along with the tundra, we get a strong positive feedback loop. That is why science has warned about certain threshold values we should not cross.
Maybe the questions of "What can we do to change things?" needs to stop being directed towards the groups that are moving too slowly on this- IE, governments and corporations. Instead what can we, the general POPULACE start doing to help, too? It's kind of mind blowing that people keep saying things need to change, and we need to hold people responsible. I'd like to know how to help, too. Can we get some coverage on this side of things with interviews from climatologists and the general scientific community?
Yes. But also: where I live we have learned that in elementary school and children’s TV since the 80s. We know! Ride your bike or public transport. Not possible? That’s your community. You can change it. Less AC. Doesn’t have to be freezing. Read where things were produced when you buy stuff. Don’t buy plastic packaging. Again: ask for alternatives so that supermarkets know what we want. If you have to drive: smaller economic car. Or e-car. Talk to people about it. Find likeminded people. Tell your mayor to build wind power plants and solar panels. You could all make money from it in the long run. Plant trees. In your garden, in your town. To collect CO2 but also to cool down the area around it. Sorry, I stop it. But each of us can do either all of these things or only one or few. But we all count.
Why not use some basic common sense? There are prosperous settlements in areas with mean annual temperatures ranging from minus 8 degrees centigrade to 31 degrees centigrade Deaths from hypothermia outnumber those from heat stroke by more than ten to one.
On that front, literally every single thing you buy or don't buy makes a difference, especially fossil fuels of course. Everything we buy creates pollution in one way or another. So we need to figure out ways to buy things that create LESS pollution. If billions of us did just that one simple little thing, it would make a BIG difference. The ball is in your court humanity!
@@johngeier8692 Explain how Canada (where I live) Russia, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, can house, feed, and employ 4 billion people? That's how many people would have to move north!
Last question "what do we do?". Decarbonizing is not the answer alone. The solution is our demand for and use of engergy. We have to reduce energy consumption in general. The cure is always worse than the cause when concentrating your energy source. Think nuclear.
The thing they don't mention is that, for us to really change anything we need less people in the future. The world population has more than tripled since 1950 from 2.5 billion to more than 8 billion today. All needing food, energy and wanting a better life. However, it's not going to work and now we are seeing why.
A buoy off the coast of Manatee Bay in Florida reported 100.9°F almost three weeks ago. The area is undergoing an algal bloom. The average temperature along the coast line in that area is less than 30c at its peak.
@@EmeraldViewThey gotta push the "sea is boiling" narrative. It's gone from believable to ridiculous. I know we're putting more carbon in the air, but that doesn't magically make it warmer. I'll bet that literally microwaving the atmosphere to detect enemy aircraft (and shoot down UFOs) hasn't done much to help.
🔥 Good luck 🔥 Florida 🔥 and 🔥 USA 🔥 (and all the Rest of the Western countries that do not REALLY want to do the necessary WORK to change their lifestyle and their System and their habits to stop the climate catastrophe). 🔥🔥🔥
Nonsense. There is no catastrophe. The latest IPCC report said that the average global temperature for 2011-2020 was just 1.1C warmer than the average for 1850-1900. Most people wouldn't warming of 1.1C if happened over 5 minutes.
100 yrs of warnings 50 yrs we expected it 10 yrs witnessing the Big Changes ! AND we continue expecting every desire delievered - tomorrow ALARM BELLZ ARE RINGING !🇨🇦
These scientist don't know how to talk. Reporter seems to be asking "How did this come to pass so suddenly?" Answer should have been "Suddenly? We've been telling you about this for fifty years. Why didn't you F'ing listen?" 😡
@@guesswho6038 I believe you are confusing what science said, to what the media said. Either way, climate change was predicted, and ignored because money.
Something new, not mentioned here, that we've been doing for decades is emitting sulfur into the atmosphere via ship exhausts, but recently stopped. This has had a warming effect as well. We should be able to take advantage of these emissions to be beneficial again without the pollution they previously produced.
Another excellent piece DW. I really appreciate you keeping us informed with your unbiased, facts only, reporting about issues that are impacting all of us globally. The Bible states, “God will destroy those destroying the Earth.” For the first time in human history those words have a literal meaning.
If the claim is that 'God will destroy those destroying the Earth' - well, why isn't it he doing just that? It's plain to me who is responsible for the vast majority of the damage - fossil fuel industries, elite CEO's who run companies encouraging high consumerism, those who promote the overconsumption of meat, logging companies, the politicians who do nothing at all. Why aren't they destroyed then? Surely it's time.
They didn't even mention the change in sulfur burning by ships. Past years ships burned way more sulfur wich is bad for the environment yet coincidentally helped greatly with cloud formation wich cools the oceans
@@la7dfa you don't think pollution has impact on ocean temperature? It was a huge change this year that the ocean going vessels stopped emitting it. And a huge change of air clarity above the ocean. It deserved to be mentioned as a possible factor in this temperature anomaly
@@la7dfa No, that's not what he's saying. It's more like we get a good thing (less pollution) and we get a negative consequence (warmer waters). These things are complex and changing one little thing, like CO2, can have disproportionate results. If we weren't emitting too much CO2 for the natural cycle to handle, the loss of sulfur wouldn't be a big deal.
I am 76 years old and have terrified of global warming, ice melting, corals dying, plastic in the ocean since I was 27 years old. Have not seen any of the doom sayers prediction coming true. Too late not to be terrified anymore.😂
It because of our lifetime, we usually think based on a limited time scale, 50 years seems to much to us but too little in geological terms, most of us prefer to say "Nah, didn't happen in 10, 20 years, It was just doomsay, do not worry"
@@kittimcconnell2633 He did open his eyes and saw it was all a fraud. 50 years ago it was global cooling. I remember this. It's all about keeping the public on edge to be saved by the experts. I learned this decades ago and am grateful for it.
You were never supposed to be terrified. Ice is melting, corals have died, some plastic is still in the ocean, (some was removed). I'm living in a province with a record number of fires. I've seen places with record temperatures, (both land and sea) I've seen places (including Washington DC) get ridiculous amounts of rain in very short periods of time. I'm not terrified, but I sure would like to see change!
The high temperature was recorded in Manatee Bay. Not in the open ocean. So it was not really “record temperatures off the coast of Florida” as the bay is surrounded by the land barrier and shallow waters of the Florida keys.
@@ussassu You seem to be soooo last month with your soundbites, dimtool. We have left the time of global warming and are now in the era of global boiling, according to the UN chief . Do try to keep up, please.
@@la7dfa I don't think it's the temperature that will be unusual. it's the fact that 100+ temperatures, will last ALL summer by that time. It won't just be a couple of weeks, like it is now. Remember, in the 20th century this used to happen for a couple of days in the summer. What happens if these temperatures were to persist for MONTHS, maybe even ALL YEAR?
Those are stock footage. There have been mass dieoffs of fish, mammals, and coral off Florida for decades, all related to warming waters and fertiliser / waste runoff . I’d be surprised if there’s much left.
He never even mentioned that the entire 400 million population of Guandahaluland has already had to migrate north of the 47th parallel and is causing a massive unsustainable pressure on the resources in that area.
The earth is about to slap us in the face anytime now we will have to add a cat 6 to the scale. In my part of Canada I haven’t noticed any difference at all. I guess I’m just in a lucky spot. We are living in the age of consequences
The month of June was dry across most of B.C. and was the driest June on record since 2015. May 2023’s dry conditions tromp on 1954’s previous local record low for the month, 13.8 mm of rain. Canada is having its worst fire season in modern history. The fires have burnt more than 20 million acres, casting hazardous smoke over parts of the U.S. We FEEL it here in Ontario.
Solar Minimum is coming to an end. This one was brutal. La Nina, hurricanes and hot "all planets and moons" from cosmic radiation. Solar Maximum is growing. Sun's heliosphere grows out to all planets and we cool down.El nino. Eleven year cycles. Education not fear❤
Wouldn't have something to do with the increase solar activity due to solar maximum? In combination with reduced global magnetic fields as a result of the pole shift that has started?
@winterlinde5395 Okay, do you remember how everyone was soooo worried about the ozone layer having a hole and we were all going to die in 20 years? Yea, that's not even talked about anymore. There isn't the technology to do anything. The entire world could go net zero right now, and it wouldn't change a thing for the next hundred years. People want to treat the environment better and should. But we already are doing the only thing we could do anyway, which is the continued use of oil and gas to keep our economy, technology, and innovation moving forward. That way, we can continue to discover new forms of energy, and people will have to adapt in the meantime.
@@MilitantPacifist69 Seems like we are consistently getting "anomalies" every year now. At what point do you consider it a trend not an anomaly? Data over the last 200 years has shown dramatically higher temperatures almost every decade over the last 50 years.
Why do we bother going on about this stuff we have all known it for years but typical human behaviour we dont do anything until it starts affecting us personally , we are just self centered and selfish creatures
even if these bots get lit up in flames, they will still deny global warming in the last seconds they're alive. they're hopeless tools, and also a minority - better to ignore them altogether.
I live in south Florida and yes it's hot and air temps at 95 to 96, heat index of 110, but the water still feels cooler then the air when I jump in.Pretty sure heat index don't apply to water because its about what it feels like do to humidity in the air.Also when I'm out fishing,diving haven't
No more cooling yourself down in the sea when you go these beaches! These seas got above normal body temperature, and a few degrees more it will actually be hotter than a scorting bath.
@@soundscape26 I suggest you look up stuff about Global Warming. It will all come clear to you. Won't even be a long read before you realise the whys and whatfors of what is happening.
I find it strange that I have been SCUBA diving in the Gulf of Mexico and the equatorial Pacific every year, and in the last ten years, the temperature at 60 feet has dropped 6 degrees!
I am also in Europe, not even south and outside it’s over 40C here. Usually 30-33C was considered hot in this area for summer. When I was a kid, 30C was considered extreme heat and parents would not let us go outside
Enjoy it while you can because 20 degrees celsius is a lot easier to deal with than 40 degrees celsius. We're also in Europe, just north of the calamitous heat of the south. Last year we were dealing with 37 degrees celsius and this year we're wearing hoodies. The hoodie weather feels 'safer'.
Growing up in FL.. This isnt global warming, the ocean doesnt just get hotter than ambient temperatures, that's not how thermodynamics/fluid dynamics works... I hate to say it but the most rational explanation is geothermal..
@@LongDefiant oh yeah? You hate 22 million people you dont know so much as to wish tragedy on them because of politics? You psychopath... the look on your face though when you realize you would be directly effected too
May the Anthropocene (Pyrocene (?)) epoch make the Permian-Triassic extinction event seem like a minor footnote in the pages of Earths history. Let us bear witness to the fruition of scenario SSP5-8.5 of the IPCC assessment
Hearing about all these developments is like getting punched in the stomach and there is no end to the increasing effects. Every extreme weather event causes another acceleration. It sounds like in a decade we will be "lucky" to even have survived up to that point.
You know we are going to have the climate lockdowns; it probably makes sense. Electric carpooling for the essential workers, solar panel installing on all house's compulsory etc.
The UK completely stopped using coal for home heating in 2022 and commercial use ends next year. Making the big changes needed to save the ecosystem we rely on is possible, if we are willing to do it together.
A warming world is a better world as the current mean surface temperature is suboptimal for plant growth. We are currently in a geological ice age with 3% of the earth’s surface under long term (millions of years) glaciation at a time of minimal glaciation. It would be much more productive to focus upon natural disaster mitigation rather than spending trillions of dollars trying to prevent small and mainly beneficial changes to the earth’s climate.
William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) argue, quoting extensive data, that the EPA’s justification of the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently been proven wrong. “The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Happer and Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.” “All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.” Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes
I predict when the difference between equatorial and polar ocean temp. lessens big changes will happen as ocean currents change. Prediction is not time sensitive.
Very well said. Since the difference in temperature between the equator and the polar regions is what drives most of our current weather. What will weather be like in a very different system?
The solution is CO2 absorption and energy production with the natural water cycle. Each year water cycle flux is 5000 times larger than all human energy in all our history. My book Pluvicopia shows how to solve the energy, water, and climate cycle in decades, not centuries. Please read it before thinking it is impossible; it is simple, powerful, and profitable.
Reporters around the world: "Scientist, can you explain to everyone why X weather event happened?" Scientists around the world: "You continue to ignore us, THAT'S what's happening." This conversation is futile.
Also the folks worried about profit over the next 3 months: "We can't afford to preserve the environment for the next generations, we have profits to make!"
eco-fascist drivel.
@@inyobill This reminds me of an interview I read in a French business magazine. The CEO of a ski lift company, building new tourism infrastructure in a small village near Annecy, was asked how they would deal with the predicted lack of snow in a few decades. He replied candidly that they had taken climate predicitons into account, and would have made their full return on investment and profits by then. His answer is exemplary for the prevailing discourse in much of the business world.
@8fledermaus8 All these are done by the X-men gangs. They are using superpowers to battle each other.
Their activity increases solar radiation and they generate haze or cloud cover using strange magical powers.
Try watching Marvey's X men series, and the truth of the current global situation.
🤣
But. But.... But...
We are human.
We need to do everything that we are Human are doing.
We....
We need to be human.
We need to keep on doing what everyday modern day human are doing.
We..
We build.. and it collapse... and we build it again... and
....and it collapsed again.... and we build.... we.......
We farm... yeah we farm... we make foods... yes we made foods.... we created biggest canned foods and soda drinks all over the world... we... we need to eat... we need to drink... we... we need to sell our foods in those restaurants to serve travellers.....we... we... we are making so much money on tourism... we... we cannot stop... we must do it... we need to keep on doing it... we.... we.... we are not scientist but indeed we... we are just bussinessmen trying to be come richer and richer... we.... we are modern day human... we... we... we dont plant tree... we plant foods all over the world... we.... we... well we.... we made so much money on those foods and drinks transportations.... we... we created uber eat... we... we created grab bike.... we... we created so much food delivery online platform trying to keep those human stop worrying about "Climate change".... we... we.... we just you know... we must travel... we must be able to travel.... we.... you know... working 365 days... no.... our jobs is really really stressful... we need to travel somewhere else because we all got sick of our everyday life inside those cities and countries.... we... we... yeah.. we want to see the world.... we... we..... we must travel to find new products from some other countries to bring it back to our countries to start some bussiness to make money...we...we.... yeah we just cannot those trades.... we.... we... those trades are most important to us before anythinh else.... we... just cannot stop traveling around.... we...we...we... we do not care if this planet will be on fire tomorrow.....we...we...we will fly to the moon or maybe build new cities on mars....dont worry.... we...we... are fine... the planet is not....
I wanted to add that warming oceans means the creation of hurricanes. Sweden has had a weird storm weather all summer which never happened before. I think we should prepare us more against the storms that are coming.
Northern Italy experienced a tornado and extreme hail, too.
There are not more hurricanes than there were in the past.
@@BobBob-uv4vcFrom the Australia cyclonic zone. We have had multiple low activity seasons in a row.
But the plus side is that is the release of heat as energy.
Have we? In what region? I’m a Swede too but have not experienced that. Only recently there seems to be flash flooding though. Those seems crazy though and out of place.
We have known for 60 years whats coming and what to do about it. I do not understand why journalists keep asking the same questions, the answers have been there for decades. The right questions would be: "We are not stopping pumping CO2 into the atmossphere and we wont stop until all the oil is used up. What do we have to do in order to live on a world with at least 5 degrees Celcius more? How do we survive?"
7C more.
When the majority of the people in the United States voted for Al Gore and he was defeated. That was the point of no return.
the answer is quite simple. People make more money when they don't have to look after the environment. Human greed will never stop.
@@NapoleonGelignite It ain't boiling 'till it's boiling.
The carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are actually beneficial. Benefits include increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia.
Both the current mean surface temperature of Earth and the current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are suboptimal for plant growth.
The main regulators of climate are Milankovitch cycles, continental drift and stellar evolution of the sun. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration has only a minor effect on this planet which has 70% deep surface oceans.
Reporter: extreme weather, nobody has seen it comming.
Scientists: we've been warning about it for the last 20 years.
Actually, it is closer to 40 years. In the 80s, there was a huge move in Congress in the US to address climate change before it got too bad. Unfortunately, the oil companies had a different opinion.
@@josephsalomoneActually the oil companies think the same, but the possible profit from drilling around arctic area obviously overcome the risk of their portfolio.
@@josephsalomone 40?! Try over 100!
@@faarsight Yes and no. There have been climate studies, noting climate change since the 1910s, but the vast majority of carbon emissions causing the temperature increase occurred after the 1950s.
@@josephsalomoneand thats worrying, as it could mean that the smaller amounts in previous years has set this in motion and as you correctly observed the massive ramp up in emissions in the last 20 to 30 years and no sign of emissions reducing anytime soon, if at all does not bode well. We are in uncharted territory now well outside the small window in which mankind has existed in the last 300,000 years. It will be interesting to see what happens with the hurricane season.
Now that I'm collapse aware, I always chuckle when climate scientists are essentially asked "what can we be doing to fix climate change"
So you have given up then. due to predictions and models.
TEOTWAWKI.
@@raclark2730As opposed to believing what?
@@niedas3426 Well you have clearly gone for worst case scenario. And taken it out of context no doubt
And even with that there are things that can still be attempted for mitigation. Even if that cant fix everything.
You can sit on the floor and cry if you want, but how about you not discourage others in the process.
Conjure up more melodramatic doomsday predictions to obtain research grants and assist their green carpet bagger patrons.
Reports, "How could this be happening?" Most scientist are too polite, they refer to previous predictions. If it was any ordinary person what you would here is "I TOLD YOU SO!"
The West is responsible
Low surfer fuel for ships sence 2020 is one reason why the sudden abrupt increase in temperatures.
Both the current mean surface temperature of Earth and the current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are suboptimal.
Warming has the net beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia.
Cooling (eg nuclear winter, asteroid impact) would have the detrimental effects of crop failures and famine, increased winter heating costs and more deaths from hypothermia.
@@johngeier8692 Those increased agricultural yeilds make it less nutritious, more empty calories from the carbon. Its diluting the nutritional potency of food, lesser micronutrients and minerals per gram.
Growing up around the Oregon coast. I cannot imagine what 100°f ocean water temps would being like? That sounds like a nightmare to the ecosystem. I really hope we actually start doing something now because we are already so far behind..
There was a a tipping point, i believe we passed it last year. That was the point where we could put the brakes on it, and have some success in turning it around. Now every warm day exacerbates every other warm day. The hots arent cooling, and making the hots hotter, until no cooling will be enough. Its both interesting and terrifying.
@@cherylcook1942this is called a positive feedback loop.
It's too late.
@@dan5956 i agree. It's definitely too late but it still baffles me that we can clearly see that it's too late and yet we aren't even trying to do anything to help make it less worse than it already will be.. we shouldn't just do nothing. We should have done way more a long time ago but i really feel like after people got mass trauma from the early learning era of nuclear energy having some bumpy moments.. it just created the perfect situation for the rich companies to keep their power in the energy department around the world.. i just wish people could give modern advanced nuclear energy options a chance now that we have learned so much and advanced so much in so many ways. Technology has improved a ton, material science, understanding radiation, safety measures, engineering, ROV/robotics, the list goes on. It all can help us greatly improve our electrical grid system and our emissions we produce. Also giving countries energy independence and it could connect with alternative energy options as well.
@@benmcreynolds8581 I'm 32-year-old, super climate aware, but I personally have given up. Got sterilized at the age of 30 as I didn't want to give a slight chance to my non-existing kid to suffer what's ahead of us
Very simplistic explenation of what needs to ve done. Reducing co2 emisions and planting some trees won't change a thing in this domino falling system. We should talk about changing the economic system, consuming less, adopt a profound interest for developing nature and biodiversity and reducing the human activity. The curent economic system based on infinit growth and consumtion is unsustaineble
Hold on, do you want to "LIMIT THE PEOPLES FREEDOM"?!
I am hearing all of those requirements being specified.
Close the lights a little bit earlier and don't use AC everything if going to be fine 🙏🙏🙏
They have 9 minutes to get the message out in this segment. DW Documentaries has longer programs which are excellent
@@pawel7196 Yes. If freedom means people trash the planet they live in then this must be done.
It's fun watching the mainstream media act like they don't know
Yeah..why weren't we warned..
The reporter is taking this role in behalf of the audience, aka you.
Since shortly shipping burns way less sulfur. Wich is good yet sulfur helped making lots of clouds wich cool the oceans
You can plant more trees but even if you do that for the next 30 years it only replaces the ones that are burning now every day across the globe.
At this point it is indeed futile, we should still do it but for other reasons - restoring ecological areas / ecosystems. But we should be under no illusion that right now it does very little for climate change.
@@__Wanderer We have reached the point of diminishing returns based on equations.
@@tombox2759 I suppose so, it is like trying to put out a raging house fire with a single glass of water. Releasing the equivalent of tens of millions of tons of trapped CO2 built up over tens of millions of years of organic matter decay requires massive changes. The burning of fossil fuels is akin to the world being on fire 24/7.
@@__Wanderer global ban on coal burning is about the only option left that might change anything... But that is never going to happen. China is building dozen new coal burning plants this year alone...
So, i'm not at all optimistic about humanys chance to survive this. Maybe it is for the better.. We have been one of the most destructive things to happen to this planet in the last 60 million years and that's saying something!
I know what you mean. Many of us plant trees wherever we can, dozens, hundreds, thousands, one person wrote in a comment section last week that he's planted a total of 250,000 so far.
But it all feels so futile now when millions of trees are being burned in widespread wildfires 'every year' - the vast majority of them being full size mature trees, decades, hundreds of years old, while our modern contributions are little more than tiny saplings (which can take as long as 15 years to offset the carbon footprint in their production).
The first tree I planted has been in the ground only 40 years, and is still nowhere near maturity, and due to the increased strength and frequency in storms I've had to change strategy and plant smaller trees instead.
Even if we could plant the same number of trees lost each year, we can't replace the same 'mass' of readily carbon-storing trees.
Imagine for a quick second that you're currently enjoying the coldest summer for the rest of your life
Well in the UK it's colder than last summer so...
@@jamessmith84240 In the UK, you can imagine it being the warmest summer for the rest of your life.
😂@@EmeraldView
Can confirm! Was just in Panama City Beach, FL and was shocked to feel the water around me SO HOT. The fish don’t like it- they were cooling under the boat shade. It wasn’t just bath water warm, there were currents of jacuzzi around me 🤿
If only these scientists had warned us about this a little earlier ...
Like, in 1840
Arrhenius who described the greenhouse effect in the late 19th century opined that carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels would have the beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields and postponement of the next glacial maximum. You can add reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia.
The main regulators of climate are Milankovitch cycles, continental drift and stellar evolution of the sun. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration only has a small effect on climate on this planet which has 70% deep surface oceans.
@@johngeier8692
CO2 has the effect of being the lever that changes many other things.
So while it itself, isn't that bad, the things it levers into happening have outsized consequences.
So tell me what happens when the oceans don't mix and we have stratification?
I hope its not too late
@@johngeier8692 😂 Ok. Nah, pulling 100s of billions of tons of carbon, locked away underground for millions of years, and putting it in to our paper thin atmosphere over the course of a couple centuries (most in the last few decades) won't have ANY impact on the chemistry of the atmosphere or the oceans, nor disrupt an ecological balance that took from millennia to much much longer to come in to its current balance.
The very deep ocean temperature should also be of concern, because of the giant reservoirs of methane that are kept in place by the combination of very high pressure and very low temperature
Junk science.
Totally agree
Those extra warm tropical waters will make hurricanes more powerful. That means category 4 and 5 hurricanes will be more common along the US east coast.
No they won't.
Stop believing any propagandistic nonsense you're being fed by the agenda pushing media.
And soon we will see category 6 hurricanes as well.
You mean like always? Because it's always "extra warm". These temperatures are *not* unusual. It's just drama on the part of media.
@@SirenaSpadesyou're really gonna sit here and tell me breaking a global record isn't unusual.
Lmao
Every day a new story about environmental problems. Every day a new story about life-saving solutions. How long will we go around in circles?🤔🤔🤔 As long as the human population grows and countries lead individual policies, I see no way out. 😥😥😟😟
I see 😢 countries must hv prioritised on enviromental issues. Profits for earth, ecosistem. Like we took fishes from sea, it must return in same, sea life heals, we heals. Leaders must cooperates also transparancy public.
Antinatalism is one way, saving energy is another
How many decades will you continue to believe these lies, that pantheists like Al Gore and other Earth-worshippers keep saying every 10 years that we only have 10 years to live, yet another 10 years goes by and we're just fine, and yet another decade goes by and we're still alive, and so on and so forth. How long will you continue to allow these charlatans to deceive you for their financial gain and to fund their false religion of pantheism?
I am pessimistic. People in a war torn country when the husband had a brief holiday to catch up, they have a kid. Come on. People don’t think it seems even in war situations, they won’t think in this slow death situation. I don’t have kids.it’s my contribution to this world
I agree, no point in reporting this, all these reports do is try frighten people just for views, the news people won't report good news, they only interested in any negative stuff they can find
There goes the multi-millionaire retirement plans to retire in Florida. Looks like well 38ºC. 0% oxygen in the water, paradise for anaerobic bacteria.
At least the boomers don't have to worry. At least while they are alive, most of their seashore mansions will be safe. Which is why many of them live true to the motto "apres moi le deluge".
@@maythesciencebewithyou yeah, I'm a boomer here in S Floridah...back in April we had over 20inchs of rainfall within hours..
Shut down everything...I mean everything...now the insurance industry is leaving the state...not only for homes but for cars...
They know the big one is coming soon
0%? how come tropical fish breathe then
@@theeraphatsunthornwit6266 I'll explain it like you're 5 years old. From 34ºC onwards, oxygen stops feeling at home and goes away.... I'm glad you talk about raising fish, I have the fish that like hot water the most and nobody in the world has aquariums above 32ºC with the discus. If you don't understand the subject, research first before commenting.
@@starlightHT Aquarium? That word is too advanced for a 5 years old. But well, that is besides the point.
Have you ever seen a graph between oxygen solubility in water and temperature? At 40 celcius , oxygen solubility is still as high as 6 mg per litre, sufficent for fish, or otherwise fish wont thrive in tropical climate, as well as coral reef.
I just checked a physics calculator. The change from 18° to 38° means the water volume is 0.5% higher. And since there is no space but in one direction the water level is rising ... just by heat. Now 0.5% sounds not much, but imagine that for ocean-amounts of water.
Its cumulative with other ocean level raising effects.
Water level has been something like 150m higher many times before so we haven't seen anything yet.
@@cyberfunk3793 But not while we were around and this is the problem.
@@AaronOkeanos the 38 is for very shallow seperated waters. ffs stop with the hysteria and sophistry
@@mistressfreezepeach Well then it's maybe just 0.25% for the rest of the ocean ... still not good.
I live in South Florida and it looks s too hot to go in the water to swim and something is has to be done..like yesterday.
If this continues the marine life will do off.
I kept tropical fish and know even a few degrees change matter, usually when there is a increase it may promote breeding..but this is way too much.
Unfortunately it is too late to save marine life. Jelly fish will likely survive. The sixth great extinction is real.
@@ImproveYourMagicIt’s the final extinction this time.
😅😅😅😅😅
All I can see are larger hurricanes and flooding in FL. Then watch as more insurance companies start pulling out of coverage or pulling out all together from the state.
@@kl3nd4thu
Yes. Gotta love insurance companies. They are supposed to protect people from disasters but they only like to collect more and more free money. They make HUGE profits throughout the world but whine if they ever have to pay out
They warned us. We ignored them. Oh well. Don't Look Up
It's 105 right now, ( Sunday) in New Mexico, Elevation 5700 feet, (1738 meters)we've been waiting for the rain ( it's our rainy season, Monsoon ) alas, nothing, nichts, nada, rien :
I live on the west coast at least a thousand, maybe two thousand kilometers north of you in Canada.
We have a similar problem here.
We had some rain overnight, the first in months, and it wasn't much.
There are approximately 400 forest fires of various sizes burning in this province alone.
Most of us live in the SW corner of the province and are hardly aware of what is happening, and how bad it is.
So I fully understand your concern about the unusual weather everyone seems to be having everywhere.
We're in runaway climate change.
The earth's core is currently undergoing a geomagnetic reversal of the poles hence all the chaotic events happening around the world.
Lol!😂😅😂😅
@@shirlp6046, that's the dumbest thing I've heard all day, why are none of the climate scientists around the world attributing these events to the pole shift then? You must be smarter than them all I guess, you heard of the Dunning Kruger effect?
it's always running from us. always one or two years until apocalype.
38C water in the ocean, that’s quite the achievement
achievement lol
Yeah, it wasn't measured in the ocean though just in some shallow swampy coastal area.
@@tellyboy17
Sea surface temperature is measured by scientists who deploy temperature sensors on satellites, buoys, ships, ocean reference stations, and through marine telemetry. It’s the average temperature of the uppermost meter of the ocean over wide areas of the ocean.
@@cloudpoint0 Yeah, but to create the scary headlines our elite's social engineers need you get a bit more creative with the data you use.
@@tellyboy17 Such as accurate measurements. How deceptive.
Say it with me everyone! _"Faster Than Expected!"_ Wheee!
Thanks for reporting on this. One of the things warming the Atlantic right now is the lack of Saharan dust that normally blows over the sea, shielding it from some of the solar energy that reaches the surface. But I haven’t heard much discussion of WHY the Saharan winds are behaving differently. It seems like it must fit into the climate situation - it’d be interesting to hear some discussion on that topic. How likely is this to be an annual occurrence? How much additional ocean heat absorption will result, and how much higher will temperatures go?
And apparently because a lack of extra toxic shipping trails, amount of sulfur dioxide above the oceans is less since they had to switch to cleaner fuel, they noticed something similar on 9=11 when the planes in the US were grounded for 3 days temperature shot up as well with the lack of contrails.
@@koyaanisqatsi78 thank you, I was searching for this. Carbon is not the only factor on temperature. Air clarity because of dust, clouds and Sulphur are huge factors
another reason is the sudden lack of ship tracks which were probably seeding clouds. google ship tracks from space
--oop somone else said this, but i want to leaev my comment here to urge others to look into the issue.
@@JasperKlijndijkYeah less heat reaches the surface but that means we actually got a huge problem... as the carbon changes the heat exchange rate of the atmos, so actually cleaning up the air would result in more heat reaching the surface but also more heat being retained in the system.. ach ja
@@koyaanisqatsi78 We've placed ourselves in a right and proper Catch 22 situation it seems.
It feels like the messaging at this point needs to be:
"We need to start shutting down all production that emits excessive carbon or we are all going to die. "
Followed by "Rolling blackouts are being initiated worldwide to reduce carbon emissions. A new policy banning personal use of ICE vehicles on consecutive days has been passed and will be enforced with 30 days in jail for all violators. "
Followed by "A 1000% worldwide tax on all petroleum products has been passed."
Followed by "A worldwide draft of workers for renewable power solutions and farming has been implemented with mandatory participation. Those who fail to comply will be shot on sight."
Sooner or later. Either that or just everyone will burn and starve to death while those in power do nothing.
Shutting down all frivolous production should have happened 30 years ago to save the biosphere. It’s too late now though.
We’re at 1.2 degrees now and we have about 1 degree hiding under the Aerosol Masking Effect.
So if we shut everything down we jump to 2+ degrees QUICKLY. And that accelerates all tipping points. The environmental apocalypse can not be stopped at this point.
@@ImproveYourMagicbut it can be stopped from getting even worse. Giving up is not helpful.
@@winterlinde5395
The top scientists have told us that will have 7 yrs to cut co2 by 50% and 28 yrs to reach zero if we are to have “any hope” in preventing apocalyptic scenarios and a great extinction.
Accepting reality is not giving up. Denying reality is not helpful to anyone.
Some of the realities that stop us from achieving climate goals.
1- The republican and/or religious mind set is that the current global warming is a natural cycle.
2- Corporate greed, Wall Street and free markets, and nations wanting to boost economies through mining and manufacturing.
3- The democrats who are pushing for a boom in green energy on a global scale through mining and manufacturing. (Preventing the 50% in 7 yrs thus counterproductive).
4- Environmentalists who would rather watch the 6th extinction unfold than to give up their bacon cheeseburger.
5- The people who are wrong in thinking our consumer driven, gadget buying, cellphone using, video game playing, new tv, meat, dairy, and egg society are ok if only we powered the destruction of Earths Biosphere through solar and wind. Disaster.
6- The tipping points that we can not stop. The biggest reality of them all.
Rain forest, Thwaites Glacier, Permafrost, Boreal Forest, rapid species extinction, sea level rise, Aerosol Masking, and everything about the ocean including the upcoming Blue Ocean Event, the AMOC failing. the ice caps, etc
7- These tipping points are all happening at once and will lead to ‘isostatic Rebound’ followed by the volcanism and earthquakes that isostatic Rebound creates.
I’ll listen to anyone who can tell me how to ‘realistically’ change any of those things.
The only good news is it might not be too late to slow it down and buy us a decade, but it is much too late to stop it.
We dwindled almost every species population down so low that they don’t stand a chance.
We can also take some steps to lesson the painful misery for humans as they die off from mass famine, disease, and war.
I’m open to any solutions.
We're not all going to die. I actually like that it's getting warmer. Also you'll have to take my car keys from my cold, dead hands.
Settle tf down bro ffs
And the conservatives are all, like, 'this is totally fine. Nothing to worry about'. Stupidity is killing us, people.
Actually, the conservatives know this is a problem, but they don't think they'll be around to suffer the consequences and more importantly, they're getting paid handsomely for lying about it and continuing stuff like giving permits for fossil fuel production.
Just buy an AC if outside is too hot! or just sell your seaside property if the waters are rising!
@@jewiesnew3786 yeah, that's the level they're thinking at. They'll be telling us all to move to Antarctica in 50 years. And they still won't admit there's a problem.
I live in Florida. They said in 2005 we were gonna be underwater by 2012. Don't believe everything you hear buddy.
@@pythondre who said it?
Pickups and suvs have cancelled out all gains made by electric cars tenfold.
And no one seems to care. Open your window and look upon the streets. Life goes on for now. I predict water will be so scarce that its value will be greater than gold. Almost all marine life will perish and many people too. But as long as we can drive our cars and eat our cheeseburgers, all is well, I'm told.
Nothing is going to perish. Fish species are millions of years old. Just 10,000 years ago the Earth was an ice ball, the oceans were vastly lower, much more salty and a lot more frigid. Whales in the Arctic migrate to the Sea of Cortez every year. Sharks are known to swim from Miami Beach to New York. They live in the North Atlantic and the Caribbean. Temps change dramatically just from winter to summer, nothing dies.
Lost of sea ice in the Arctic means a positive feedback. Less ice means faster warming, which means less ice.
When we reach the "Big Burp" (permafrost rapid methane release event), it will be irreversible.
Plus the wild fires - this outlandish fire season in Canada released 2-3 times as much carbon as the whole Canadian Nation combined, transport, industry, agriculture, energy infrastructure, everything. We are in a dire spot for sure. Mitigating the effects of the climate catastrophy alone is a monumental task for our societies.
The siberian tundras are already belching large bubbles of methane gas and leaving huge craters behind. Google "Siberia methane craters" to see awesome holes that keep appearing at continually increasing rate.
It may not be "when we reach it" but "is it already here"....
Not to mention the CO2 and other emissions from sudden massive ocean die-off. Add to that increased heat absorption from terrestrial exposure due to glacial melt and we have ourselves an autocatalytic cycle which we can neither reverse nor stop, only hope to slow a little bit.
"Learn a lesson from the fig tree. When its branch becomes tender and sprouts leaves, you know that summer is near.
In the same way, when you see all these things, know that he is near, at the gates.
Amen, I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things have taken place.
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away."
from the Gospel of Matthew
So there's good news for you. Arctic sea ice does not cooperate and refuses to disappear. All predictions about it were hilariously wrong.
"unsure about the causes?" are you kidding me?
Smartest comment I’ve read so far.
Just remember all those that said global warming was not real
We have waited 70 years for our gouvernments and the UN to solve this problems and nothing happened. We are doomed!
Wait a minute, you are claiming climate change was widely known and approved in 1953? Are you sure about that number because it absolutely was not widely accepted opinion. There may have been evidence by some scientist but claiming there has been wide front fighting against the climate change for 70 years is just pure lie.
I could accept 40 years... Modern day wider public enviromentalism started some 30 years ago, before that it was considered a hoodoo from hippie scientists.
70 years ago means 1953. I'm pretty sure climate hysteria was not invented in the 50's
@@guesswho6038 The first scientific warnings about climate change and the destruction of nature date back to the 1950s. There is plenty of films by Prof. Grzimek, Jacques Custeau and others on the subject of nature alone. I'm pretty sure you are one of the inventors of ignorance, or at least its foremost disciple.
First warning of climate change was published 1941 by Hermann Flohn.
@@alaric_ it was known in the 1950’s.
It’s what led to Exxon's research from the late1970’s which forecasted the globe would warm by around 0.2 degrees Celsius every decade. Which it has.
Is it widely accepted today. Not at all.
And today’s folk who do accept it do not understand it or how grave the near immediate future is.
The climate hysteria started in the 1960s and was based on science that has since been proven to be wildly exaggerated.
Hurricanes will be super devastating with all this warm water.
Hurricanes aren't created from warm water. They're created when cold air hits warm water. That's why they aren't getting worse or more frequent.
The end is near 🔥
We're on borrowed time
Good Job, DW
Yes, water temperature has impact on dissolved gasses. The resultant condition is to be observed.
Fishes needs to swim shallow, and go polar cooler water. Does that create Ocean Desert 🏜?
Scary.
😢
@jzsbff4801 Good info for adaptation. In Pacific rim, SUPER TYPHOON create huge CLOUD COVER over a vast region.
This reduce GROUND LEVEL heat, and SEA WATER temperatures. And it created a lot of rain 🌧, Red China & Pacific rim is lucky compared to the troubles in EU & Moslem crescent. EL NINO somehow got defeated by the typhoons.
Let's watch on and be ready with adaptation strategies.
🥹
We are waiting for ADAPTATION strategies of GERMANY & FRANCE, the KEY TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT states in the EU.
🥹
Will be interesting to see what this hot water will do in the hurricane season. Let's hope Mar-a-Lago gets struck and leveled.
Why do you care. He's not even in power, yet you somehow blame him for all the wrecking Brandon's doing.
not only is he a brilliant professor, also he speaks multiple languages with apparent ease. :+D
If hot weather is so bad why are cities like Bangkok, Chennai and Dubai booming?
@@johngeier8692 around the North American great lakes we are also doing better and better.
@@johngeier8692 Chennai and Dubai is hot most of the year. What are you smoking?
The most important choice in this world is what to give up. However, please continue to struggle until the end. If you give up, the game ends there.
Too bad the game's been over a long time already. We should have started 50 years ago.
The world is going to die in a global sauna because the top three polluters refuse to do anything about the issue. Handfull of small countries are strangling themselves with literally zero effect on global emissions in the futile hopes that someone might take notice of their sacrifice and join in the difficult decisions..... In vain.
When the world finally ignites and starts to burn, at least few clean countries can say proudly "we told you so" before the humanity, as we know it, dies off.
Climate change woundn't end human civilisation it would make the planet a lot worse in some aspects but yeah there are few things able to end human civilisation
I consider it a privilege to be able to live to witness what's coming.
What a load of baseless twaddle.
The world is much greener now than it was 20 years ago. Get a grip... please ✌
I am waiting for the British guys commenting how the water is still cold in England.
The water is still cold in England. Cheers.
Our planet is irreversibly screwed and it’s all our fault. My sympathies to future generations.
that is super scary.
Lol!😂😅😂
So many in deep denial in the comments... Would it be sign of extreme fear?
*_The denial is from a lack of knowledge and understanding_*
If the ocean warms enough, then methane hydrate on the continental shelves can rise into the atmosphere, further increasing the overall greenhouse effect
The Laptev Ocean in Siberia contains enormous amounts of methane ice. When that starts to melt along with the tundra, we get a strong positive feedback loop.
That is why science has warned about certain threshold values we should not cross.
Honestly why the invite an expert if they are just going to say temperatures are rising and water is melting on repeat, instead of real data
Maybe the questions of "What can we do to change things?" needs to stop being directed towards the groups that are moving too slowly on this- IE, governments and corporations. Instead what can we, the general POPULACE start doing to help, too?
It's kind of mind blowing that people keep saying things need to change, and we need to hold people responsible. I'd like to know how to help, too. Can we get some coverage on this side of things with interviews from climatologists and the general scientific community?
Yes.
But also: where I live we have learned that in elementary school and children’s TV since the 80s. We know!
Ride your bike or public transport. Not possible? That’s your community. You can change it.
Less AC. Doesn’t have to be freezing.
Read where things were produced when you buy stuff.
Don’t buy plastic packaging. Again: ask for alternatives so that supermarkets know what we want.
If you have to drive: smaller economic car. Or e-car.
Talk to people about it. Find likeminded people.
Tell your mayor to build wind power plants and solar panels. You could all make money from it in the long run.
Plant trees. In your garden, in your town. To collect CO2 but also to cool down the area around it.
Sorry, I stop it. But each of us can do either all of these things or only one or few. But we all count.
Why not use some basic common sense? There are prosperous settlements in areas with mean annual temperatures ranging from minus 8 degrees centigrade to 31 degrees centigrade
Deaths from hypothermia outnumber those from heat stroke by more than ten to one.
On that front, literally every single thing you buy or don't buy makes a difference, especially fossil fuels of course.
Everything we buy creates pollution in one way or another.
So we need to figure out ways to buy things that create LESS pollution.
If billions of us did just that one simple little thing, it would make a BIG difference.
The ball is in your court humanity!
@@johngeier8692
Explain how Canada (where I live) Russia, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Iceland, can house, feed, and employ 4 billion people?
That's how many people would have to move north!
Stupidity of humans we all suffer
Last question "what do we do?". Decarbonizing is not the answer alone. The solution is our demand for and use of engergy. We have to reduce energy consumption in general. The cure is always worse than the cause when concentrating your energy source. Think nuclear.
The thing they don't mention is that, for us to really change anything we need less people in the future. The world population has more than tripled since 1950 from 2.5 billion to more than 8 billion today. All needing food, energy and wanting a better life. However, it's not going to work and now we are seeing why.
Sad truth is that all our economies (except Japan maybe) are designed for population growth
A buoy off the coast of Manatee Bay in Florida reported 100.9°F almost three weeks ago. The area is undergoing an algal bloom. The average temperature along the coast line in that area is less than 30c at its peak.
Reason looks very different to fear mongering. No mention of a algal bloom, go figure
Self correcting problem, when the fish die so will the people who eat them.
Algal bloom has to be good in some way - more food in the ecosystem. Climate change has numerous benefits, but discussing them is anathema, so...
Thanks for changing units there, it's VERY clear now. 🙄
@@EmeraldViewThey gotta push the "sea is boiling" narrative. It's gone from believable to ridiculous. I know we're putting more carbon in the air, but that doesn't magically make it warmer. I'll bet that literally microwaving the atmosphere to detect enemy aircraft (and shoot down UFOs) hasn't done much to help.
simply stop emitting ghg's. that's it. thanks
🔥 Good luck 🔥 Florida 🔥 and 🔥 USA 🔥 (and all the Rest of the Western countries that do not REALLY want to do the necessary WORK to change their lifestyle and their System and their habits to stop the climate catastrophe). 🔥🔥🔥
Nonsense. There is no catastrophe. The latest IPCC report said that the average global temperature for 2011-2020 was just 1.1C warmer than the average for 1850-1900. Most people wouldn't warming of 1.1C if happened over 5 minutes.
We currently have anglers off the coast of Oregon fishing for Dorado (Mahi-mahi) and other temperate and tropical fish.
100 yrs of warnings
50 yrs we expected it
10 yrs witnessing the Big Changes !
AND we continue expecting every desire delievered - tomorrow
ALARM BELLZ ARE RINGING !🇨🇦
These scientist don't know how to talk. Reporter seems to be asking "How did this come to pass so suddenly?"
Answer should have been "Suddenly? We've been telling you about this for fifty years. Why didn't you F'ing listen?"
😡
you're being manipulated.
That’s not their job. Their job is to research. But you are right somehow.
Fifty years? History is changing even faster than temperatures. In the 70's administered scare was global cooling.
@@guesswho6038 I believe you are confusing what science said, to what the media said.
Either way, climate change was predicted, and ignored because money.
Something new, not mentioned here, that we've been doing for decades is emitting sulfur into the atmosphere via ship exhausts, but recently stopped. This has had a warming effect as well. We should be able to take advantage of these emissions to be beneficial again without the pollution they previously produced.
Another excellent piece DW. I really appreciate you keeping us informed with your unbiased, facts only, reporting about issues that are impacting all of us globally. The Bible states, “God will destroy those destroying the Earth.” For the first time in human history those words have a literal meaning.
God is a delusional thought
I will let you in on a little secret: God is just as real as santa.
"unbiased , facts only reporting " under a total climate hysteria disinfo campaign.
God isn't destroying anything. Humans are. Also, God is a myth created by men.
If the claim is that 'God will destroy those destroying the Earth' - well, why isn't it he doing just that?
It's plain to me who is responsible for the vast majority of the damage - fossil fuel industries, elite CEO's who run companies encouraging high consumerism, those who promote the overconsumption of meat, logging companies, the politicians who do nothing at all.
Why aren't they destroyed then? Surely it's time.
we had stretches of 36 degree+ Celsius days this year, could not sit anywhere without sweating
They didn't even mention the change in sulfur burning by ships. Past years ships burned way more sulfur wich is bad for the environment yet coincidentally helped greatly with cloud formation wich cools the oceans
Yes lets pollute way more... pffttt
@@la7dfa you don't think pollution has impact on ocean temperature? It was a huge change this year that the ocean going vessels stopped emitting it. And a huge change of air clarity above the ocean. It deserved to be mentioned as a possible factor in this temperature anomaly
@@la7dfa
No, that's not what he's saying.
It's more like we get a good thing (less pollution) and we get a negative consequence (warmer waters).
These things are complex and changing one little thing, like CO2, can have disproportionate results.
If we weren't emitting too much CO2 for the natural cycle to handle, the loss of sulfur wouldn't be a big deal.
Did anyone notice what happened to average temps during the covid lockdowns?
I am 76 years old and have terrified of global warming, ice melting, corals dying, plastic in the ocean since I was 27 years old. Have not seen any of the doom sayers prediction coming true. Too late not to be terrified anymore.😂
It because of our lifetime, we usually think based on a limited time scale, 50 years seems to much to us but too little in geological terms, most of us prefer to say "Nah, didn't happen in 10, 20 years, It was just doomsay, do not worry"
then open your eyes
@@kittimcconnell2633
He did open his eyes and saw it was all a fraud. 50 years ago it was global cooling. I remember this.
It's all about keeping the public on edge to be saved by the experts. I learned this decades ago and am grateful for it.
You were never supposed to be terrified.
Ice is melting, corals have died, some plastic is still in the ocean, (some was removed).
I'm living in a province with a record number of fires.
I've seen places with record temperatures, (both land and sea)
I've seen places (including Washington DC) get ridiculous amounts of rain in very short periods of time.
I'm not terrified, but I sure would like to see change!
Great questions!
The high temperature was recorded in Manatee Bay. Not in the open ocean. So it was not really “record temperatures off the coast of Florida” as the bay is surrounded by the land barrier and shallow waters of the Florida keys.
Ssshhh, James! Don't tell them the truth now we've got em all so scared they'll hand over any amount of money!!
@@workdevice7808 you will get lit up in flames, and you will still deny global warming. luckily people like you are in minority.
@@ussassu You seem to be soooo last month with your soundbites, dimtool. We have left the time of global warming and are now in the era of global boiling, according to the UN chief . Do try to keep up, please.
God said : … take care of my planet … so friends : … humans destroyed the earth…. Now it’s too late : … fear the gods from heaven… 🔥🔥🔥🌎🔥🔥🔥💀👍🔥🔥🔥🔥
"Unsure of the causes" 😂
It's caused by the geomagnetic reversal of the poles in the earth's core.
Louisiana is on a 5 week stretch of 95 degree days. Lake pontchatrain is hot water. The last five days was 98 in the shade.
In 2050 large portions of the U.S. will have two months of 100+ every summer. And it can get way worse after that.
@@la7dfa
I don't think it's the temperature that will be unusual.
it's the fact that 100+ temperatures, will last ALL summer by that time.
It won't just be a couple of weeks, like it is now.
Remember, in the 20th century this used to happen for a couple of days in the summer.
What happens if these temperatures were to persist for MONTHS, maybe even ALL YEAR?
@@jimthain8777 Yes I agree. I heard the increasing ocean warming this year equals the heat from 7 Hiroshima nukes every second. It is pretty insane.
@@la7dfa Yes, I heard that exact report too. I still cannot stop laughing at it. Just do the maths on it for ONE DAY alone and see how it works out.
That's a surprising amount of wildlife in the ocean near Florida. I was expecting more oil patches and underwater fields of discarded walking sticks.
Those are stock footage. There have been mass dieoffs of fish, mammals, and coral off Florida for decades, all related to warming waters and fertiliser / waste runoff . I’d be surprised if there’s much left.
Oh, that's more what I was expecting to see, sadly :(
He never even mentioned that the entire 400 million population of Guandahaluland has already had to migrate north of the 47th parallel and is causing a massive unsustainable pressure on the resources in that area.
The earth is about to slap us in the face anytime now we will have to add a cat 6 to the scale. In my part of Canada I haven’t noticed any difference at all. I guess I’m just in a lucky spot. We are living in the age of consequences
Where in Canada are you? You haven't noticed UNCONTROLLED massive forest fires in every province, BEFORE "fire season" even started?
@@crimsonwolf9099 yes but no fires are anywhere near me. And the smoke was very minimal.
The month of June was dry across most of B.C. and was the driest June on record since 2015.
May 2023’s dry conditions tromp on 1954’s previous local record low for the month, 13.8 mm of rain.
Canada is having its worst fire season in modern history. The fires have burnt more than 20 million acres, casting hazardous smoke over parts of the U.S.
We FEEL it here in Ontario.
Solar Minimum is coming to an end. This one was brutal. La Nina, hurricanes and hot "all planets and moons" from cosmic radiation. Solar Maximum is growing. Sun's heliosphere grows out to all planets and we cool down.El nino.
Eleven year cycles.
Education not fear❤
stop this nonsense.
its snowing right now in Germany.
On the Zugspitze?
The message is clear TAKE ACTION NOW OR FACE EXTINCTION.
Wouldn't have something to do with the increase solar activity due to solar maximum? In combination with reduced global magnetic fields as a result of the pole shift that has started?
Shh that's inconvenient to the narrative.
The earth did this exact thing before people even existed. We have seen this before. Lots of times actually.
Not this quickly and not the cause of humans, like it is now. Please try to keep up.
@CT-vm4gf ohhhh yes, it has and much much hotter. Nice try.
@@harryPairyou say before people even existed. But now we do exist. That’s why we have a problem. And we can solve it.
@winterlinde5395 Okay, do you remember how everyone was soooo worried about the ozone layer having a hole and we were all going to die in 20 years? Yea, that's not even talked about anymore. There isn't the technology to do anything. The entire world could go net zero right now, and it wouldn't change a thing for the next hundred years. People want to treat the environment better and should. But we already are doing the only thing we could do anyway, which is the continued use of oil and gas to keep our economy, technology, and innovation moving forward. That way, we can continue to discover new forms of energy, and people will have to adapt in the meantime.
Stop making us afraid...it is summer ☀️ 😅
Fear makes you compliant, or at least the types that still buy into this sort of thing.
@tellyboy17 sorry I dont give a dam
@@adelmejbar6406It's all happening according to plan
Putting your head in the sand doesn't mean reality will change.
@@MilitantPacifist69 Seems like we are consistently getting "anomalies" every year now. At what point do you consider it a trend not an anomaly? Data over the last 200 years has shown dramatically higher temperatures almost every decade over the last 50 years.
The facts we'll be seeing soon, everyone of these theories are wrong.
What theories?
Why do we bother going on about this stuff we have all known it for years but typical human behaviour we dont do anything until it starts affecting us personally , we are just self centered and selfish creatures
even if these bots get lit up in flames, they will still deny global warming in the last seconds they're alive. they're hopeless tools, and also a minority - better to ignore them altogether.
I live in south Florida and yes it's hot and air temps at 95 to 96, heat index of 110, but the water still feels cooler then the air when I jump in.Pretty sure heat index don't apply to water because its about what it feels like do to humidity in the air.Also when I'm out fishing,diving haven't
Florida has turned into a giant ecological and cultural cesspool. It's sad that so much of the coral and brain cells has died.
@@coraltown1All four points you made are correct. We’ll said.
Thanks,I got cut off before I finished i also have temp on my fishfinder and haven't seen those temps
Living up to the stereotype, I see.
No more cooling yourself down in the sea when you go these beaches! These seas got above normal body temperature, and a few degrees more it will actually be hotter than a scorting bath.
how can the oceans be warming when the glaciers are melting to cool them
??? Compared to the ocean, glaciers are literally nothing
lol imagine adding an ice cube from your refrigerator in a bathtub of 38 degree, what is it going to do?
How can they be replenished then?
And why are the glaciers melting, uh?
@@soundscape26 I suggest you look up stuff about Global Warming. It will all come clear to you. Won't even be a long read before you realise the whys and whatfors of what is happening.
I find it strange that I have been SCUBA diving in the Gulf of Mexico and the equatorial Pacific every year, and in the last ten years, the temperature at 60 feet has dropped 6 degrees!
I want some of that stuff. It's bloody cold in Europe right now - hardly 20 degrees of Celsius.
I am also in Europe, not even south and outside it’s over 40C here. Usually 30-33C was considered hot in this area for summer.
When I was a kid, 30C was considered extreme heat and parents would not let us go outside
don´t know if you watched the news the last weeks, in southern europe it was 40-45°C, greece islands were burning
I'm in Europe and under 35⁰ right now.
Enjoy it while you can because 20 degrees celsius is a lot easier to deal with than 40 degrees celsius. We're also in Europe, just north of the calamitous heat of the south. Last year we were dealing with 37 degrees celsius and this year we're wearing hoodies. The hoodie weather feels 'safer'.
Depends on where you are. 40 deg is not uncommon in large swathes.
Growing up in FL.. This isnt global warming, the ocean doesnt just get hotter than ambient temperatures, that's not how thermodynamics/fluid dynamics works... I hate to say it but the most rational explanation is geothermal..
We're all hoping the earth opens up under Florida
@@LongDefiant oh yeah? You hate 22 million people you dont know so much as to wish tragedy on them because of politics? You psychopath... the look on your face though when you realize you would be directly effected too
As the water is warmer it stores less corabon, I never knew this, scary
Would the slowing down if the Amoc ( Which it is ) have an effect on the warmer waters?
thanks
Very clear statements, thank you
These numbers sound very high, are they higher than normal for Florida? How hot are they in the usual August in Florida?
It is safe to say 100 deg F is a degree above the usual 99 deg F.
How long before electricity is deemed illegal ?
We will lose Electric grids when they fail from apocalyptic like scenarios due to climate change.
@@ImproveYourMagic I can't even tell if you're for real or not as real climtards speak just like that.
May the Anthropocene (Pyrocene (?)) epoch make the Permian-Triassic extinction event seem like a minor footnote in the pages of Earths history. Let us bear witness to the fruition of scenario SSP5-8.5 of the IPCC assessment
it's about to boil!
Hearing about all these developments is like getting punched in the stomach and there is no end to the increasing effects. Every extreme weather event causes another acceleration. It sounds like in a decade we will be "lucky" to even have survived up to that point.
You know we are going to have the climate lockdowns; it probably makes sense. Electric carpooling for the essential workers, solar panel installing on all house's compulsory etc.
The UK completely stopped using coal for home heating in 2022 and commercial use ends next year. Making the big changes needed to save the ecosystem we rely on is possible, if we are willing to do it together.
A warming world is a better world as the current mean surface temperature is suboptimal for plant growth.
We are currently in a geological ice age with 3% of the earth’s surface under long term (millions of years) glaciation at a time of minimal glaciation.
It would be much more productive to focus upon natural disaster mitigation rather than spending trillions of dollars trying to prevent small and mainly beneficial changes to the earth’s climate.
William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) argue, quoting extensive data, that the EPA’s justification of the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently been proven wrong.
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Happer and Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.”
“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”
Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes
I predict when the difference between equatorial and polar ocean temp. lessens big changes will happen as ocean currents change. Prediction is not time sensitive.
Very well said.
Since the difference in temperature between the equator and the polar regions is what drives most of our current weather.
What will weather be like in a very different system?
Please shut down the schools and get the students to plant
Trees for one full year . And they have to protect and water them too
All those mouth breathers goin, starting to really heat this place up ⬆️
The solution is CO2 absorption and energy production with the natural water cycle. Each year water cycle flux is 5000 times larger than all human energy in all our history. My book Pluvicopia shows how to solve the energy, water, and climate cycle in decades, not centuries. Please read it before thinking it is impossible; it is simple, powerful, and profitable.