Antifreeze Killer Mark Jensen Faces New Trial for Poisoning Wife to Death
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 янв 2023
- Convicted killer Mark Jensen faces a new trial on Monday for poisoning his wife with antifreeze in 1998.
#MarkJensen #MurderTrial #LawandCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam 
Развлечения
NOT call her a victim? She’s dead; doesn’t that make her a victim?
No, sadly
No, because the alleged victim could have been the aggressor.
The man killed her, said things to other people that suggested he would kill her, laughs, winks his eyes, smiles, it’s disgusting… He’s playing with the system and making a mockery of the judges and of everyone else…. Throw Mark under the jail period
Agree….how cold can a man be
Agree, courts shouldn’t be able to overturn jury decisions unless very clear new evidence is found? That’s not the case here.
What a cruel way to kill your spouse. He deserves every ounce of misery he faces for the rest of his pathetic life.
None of us obviously knew his wife or how their relationship was. But I' am not saying this is right or wrong. But if this was her doing this to him, you would probably be cheering
Double standard exists.
@@rickkrockstar Wow lots of assumptions there. Yeah, I'm totally for murder when it's a woman killing a man. 🙄 You have some bad hang-ups and maybe should seek therapy.
@@AirplaneDoctor_ that’s horrible 😢
@@rickkrockstar
Assumption(-s) - and seemingly issues with women...
You're a real catch!
@@AirplaneDoctor_ Thats incredibly cruel, how long have you hated animals?
please...he gave his dad a high five right after her funeral!!!
Did he seriously!?
He was convicted for lifetime without parole earlier, by Bruce Schroeder, the same judge that was overseeing Kyle Rittenhouse's trial, and without a doubt the man is going to face the same conviction, B. Schroeder's sentencing words were powerful and firm, there won't be any surprises.
I guess quoting B. Schroeder, this man needs to be removed from society.
Keep this monster in prison!! The reporter doesn't know what she's talking about - there's mountains of evidence that mark murdered Julie.
I don't know what state of mind Julie was in or how well she knew her neighbor or why she gave her such a note. I don't know if the neighbor had read the note before Julie died but I've heard of cases where people give similar notes to others, telling them not to open the note unless something happens to them & I think HUH? I don't think so!!! That's the first thing I'd do!!!
She wrote a letter, told the police and her friends….what else could she have done!?!
She also called the police about several other absurd things and reported things that were not criminal or justifiable to report like when he had marker on his face. She also stated images were her when they clearly was not...she was not in the right state of mind
Why is he even getting a new trial? Why do the evidence isn’t allowed
Constitutional right to appeal.
Whenever I hear defense attorneys speak I am reminded that not a single one of them has a soul.
Then how do you propose we deal with accused people, do they have no defence allowed at all based on accusations? What about defence attorneys that have defended innocent people, how do we find out they are innocent without them having a defence?
24 years after the crime?
Sick of our town being in the news 😭
I was just thinking that...a lot of cases in Wisconsin lately.. Florida is up there too
He is so GUILTY of this. She was the victim.
If he’s innocent he shouldn’t care what they call her
Justice for Julie💗💗the jury will get it right
Get Old Sparky fired up 💥💥
Why is he bothering with this? Does he just want some time out of prison? He's going back.
I see the channel say it's live now but only if you pay? I thought they wouldnt put trials behind a pay wall?
But when does the new trial start? They said yesterday but I couldn’t find it anywhere 😅
Shows it on now but you have to pay so I'm wondering if that's what's going on.
Is law & crime making us pay to watch the replays? Or just the live?
I'm wondering the same thing. Says its live now but you have to pay
@@88jeebs so ridiculous. Its only $2 but they’re making so much money off ads already 🙄 the Depp v. Heard trial gave them a big head lol
@@Alina-ci3fb exactly. It's not like I can't afford the $2. It's the principle. Like you said, they are making an absolute killing off ad revenue. What's funny is we were reassured over and over this wouldn't happen when the rumor was starting they were going to do this.
So will this trial be free to watch Wednesday, or does it require a paid subscription?
It free
Will this one be live??? Because it was yesterday and it wasn't broadcast
I looked this morning and it said you have to pay to watch it. So idk
@@88jeebs I am a member but I don't see it at all
Thought this dude was long locked up.
Retrial based on appeal. Something to do with the letter and recording made by the victim.
Should be interesting!
You should see the Stacey Castor trial and movie
Fun fact, he had the same judge as Kyle Rittenhouse.
The conviction should stick.She’s no longer here that’s the proof.
Anyone know what judge this is?
I hope he pays if guilty
Common sense goes a long way. Something seems wonky about this. Entertaining that the “victim” did this to herself to get back at her husband doesn’t even make sense. What a waste of time and money. She wouldn’t be an unavailable witness if her disturbed husband didn’t kill her.
He either did it or she wrote that to spite him
Can't have a murder trial without a victim. Derr 🤓
Why was this overturned and he has been granted a new trial? I'm confused..😕
Granted a new trial on appeal.
He’s already been convicted by a jury?
I feel that courts should not be able to over turn jury decisions unless there’s irrefutable new evidence?
Which there appears not to be in this case???
That’s what this is. In the first trial they convicted him with evidence of a letter Julie wrote. They weren’t allowed to use that this time
Wish people could just get used to divorce???
How in the world is the judge not allowing the vm played where she was in fear of her husband. She is not here to testify seems like that would be very relevant.
I don’t know why any lawyer would represent Mark Jensen, other then trying to popularize your career…. Mark Jensen killed his wife and he knows it… this man became bored with his life and wife and then met a female whom he took interest in… and instead of divorcing his wife, because he was too comfortable at home in his comfort place, he killed his wife…. He didn’t want to give up his home and new his wife would not leave or move out, so he cowardly did the unthinkable…. He is a monster, to even have a thought of murder in his head is horrific… and the other woman is absolutely disgusting, because she played a part in this as well…. She antagonized the issue of him getting rid of his wife😢😢😢
She’s a public defender. She doesn’t get a choice in who she represents.
These wife guys are getting ridiculous. The 3 Brians, the 3 Petersons, and then the family annihilators. Every day a new one.
I’m not sure Scott Peterson is guilty. All the witnesses that say they saw Lacey all get twisted with the timing. There is a documentary on here. And how Lacey walked up on a burglary in progress and the guys are now in prison but they don’t tell you that. And how they even said something about taking her life.
That lady is good.
Imagine loving her unconditionally
And having kids with her guys.
Imagine.
I sometimes think my wife is trying to kill me… turns out she is just doing idiotic dangerous things.
Hilarious 😂 🤣
(It was supposed to funny wasn’t it?)
I hope so 😢
Looks like her letter was an issue after all and now look what happened his conviction was overturned and he gets another bite of the apple without the letter, this as well as the passage of time since the first trial, then on top of that I bet this case has been long forgotten by the general public these 3 things will help him get out on a not guilty verdict
I hope not but I know the letter was the main reason he was convicted last time without that letter first and for most the prosecution has a steep hill to climb
What? I remember that trial. Why does he get a do-over?
The judge made a mistake, big mistake. ‘Just with the witnesses WE have’ that is telegraphing to all of us, he’s squaring in the prosecution’s corner. Bad bad bad judge!
How could her voicemail LITERALLY TELLING the police who the murderer is not admissible 🥸
Because it was ruled not to qualify as a deathbed confession. Once you decide it isn’t a deathbed confession, then obviously it isn’t admissible since she can’t be cross examined.
was she frozen ?
She knew he was so what an unhappy marriage. So Vows were lies & no LOVE there?💜🙏💜
Let him go!
no!
Innocent
@darb innocent
why do you think he's innocent?
@@lennarthagen3638 your mom is innocent... 🥶
Victims can’t be victims if they caused the need for self defense (homicide). IMO (I.e. PRO Kyle Rittenhouse)
Judge has Lithuanian surname! 👋