Electric Field Due to a Ring of Charge, Linear Charge Density, Physics Practice Problems

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025
  • This physics video tutorial explains how to calculate the electric field of a ring of charge. It explains why the y components of the electric field cancels and how to calculate the linear charge density given the total charge of the ring, the radius, and the distance between the center of the ring and a point P that lies on the x axis perpendicular to the surface of the ring. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
    Physics Video Lessons:
    www.video-tuto...

Комментарии • 125

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  Год назад +1

    Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/
    Physics Video Lessons: www.video-tutor.net/physics.html

  • @dwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
    @dwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 5 лет назад +146

    The book was complicated and demotivating, why is this so much simpler? Great video as always, my friend you are a saint.

  • @vernardoortega6822
    @vernardoortega6822 4 года назад +33

    I been struggling with this section. My teacher makes it, so complicated and sometimes frustrating the way he explains it. Thank you, very much.

  • @yvansugira8120
    @yvansugira8120 3 года назад +6

    Good one.
    It is just so surprising how this teacher of ours is called the Organic Chemistry Tutor and he is teaching a wide range of stuff ; Math,Physics....
    Thank teach you are a blessing

  • @ХафизаИсмаилова-м3я
    @ХафизаИсмаилова-м3я 4 года назад +13

    you are the best!!!! noone could make physics interesting to me, but with you İ can study without getting bored. and you have the most precious voice İ have ever heard))))

  • @user-gw2vz5gh2n
    @user-gw2vz5gh2n Год назад +3

    this man out here carrying all of our careers

  • @der_ABV
    @der_ABV 4 года назад +7

    bro your voice make us calm and this is the reason why we learn !!! god save you for us

  • @arcadiapeek6856
    @arcadiapeek6856 3 года назад +3

    You are such a positive influence on STEM education in the 21st century that I genuinely believe you should have your own Wikipedia page.

  • @لمىعبدالله-ف8ز
    @لمىعبدالله-ف8ز 6 лет назад +13

    I'm in my second year in physics and i like your videos A LOT!! also we share it between us to understand our topics and have examples on it. thank you very much teacher!!!

  • @nothysaint27
    @nothysaint27 5 лет назад +1

    This reduces my stress by 99%. I am doing this topic right now but in chinese. So complicated that I can't understand what my professor is teaching us. Thanks man, this is great video for me 👍👍👍👍

  • @rotemdagan3722
    @rotemdagan3722 4 года назад +2

    I read this material from my book for like 3 hrs and yet didnt understand until this video, so thanks dude

  • @KarlMarkGerolao
    @KarlMarkGerolao Месяц назад +1

    Interesting!!! This makes the one in textbook a piece of cake. Thank you!!!

  • @Anamelessdude69
    @Anamelessdude69 8 месяцев назад

    You are always there when we need you, be blessed, bro

  • @nickcarriero8274
    @nickcarriero8274 3 года назад

    Thank you so much, this is so much easier to understand than the way my professor explains it. You're a real life saver

  • @musicatation2254
    @musicatation2254 4 года назад +4

    You sir are saving lives,literally.Keep at what you are doing please👏🏻

  • @MasterSpencer2483
    @MasterSpencer2483 6 лет назад +7

    Really helpful, thanks so much! You helped my avoid a frustrating night

  • @whitehole4460
    @whitehole4460 3 года назад +1

    I'm always thankful for this person and I will always be. THANK YOU

  • @saneleqwabe8424
    @saneleqwabe8424 4 года назад +4

    You are a life saver thank you for simplifying this concept

  • @LawrenceMK2
    @LawrenceMK2 4 месяца назад

    all hail the triangle, the shape that simplifies our physics and makes our lives bearable

  • @theroadnottaken_
    @theroadnottaken_ 6 лет назад +3

    You are amazing. You teach chemisty and physics, both difficult subjects :)

  • @ahmedalblooshi8206
    @ahmedalblooshi8206 4 года назад

    Thank you mister ... it was way simpler than the book

  • @abktv1054
    @abktv1054 2 года назад

    thank you sir you're light for me in this dark life where i cant understand physics from teachers other than you😪

  • @tudong8649
    @tudong8649 2 года назад

    Thank you for providing such lessons that are very comprehensible and full of necessary contents.

  • @gabrielmwape6883
    @gabrielmwape6883 5 лет назад

    wow , your effort is really significant to my success in physics course.

  • @The053199
    @The053199 2 года назад +4

    My professor spent two weeks on this and I still didnt get it, one night after sleeping on this video and I can do the super hard problems my professor gives us. My professor teaches a super basic level understanding of the topics and then expects us to solve super complex problems. This video literally is saving me on my midterm cause this is the only topic I was struggling with in physics 2

  • @MARTINUS_DAVIE
    @MARTINUS_DAVIE 3 года назад +1

    i love it you always help us so much may you be blessed so much

  • @Pages_Perfected
    @Pages_Perfected 4 года назад +2

    best yt channel ever

  • @jesseb5378
    @jesseb5378 2 года назад

    A savior to students for sure!

  • @yapzhilin9857
    @yapzhilin9857 3 года назад +1

    so so so thankful for this!! Thank you so much

  • @analauravestibulanda1576
    @analauravestibulanda1576 8 лет назад

    Oh My! Thanks for the good classes! Big hug from Brazil

  • @jasmine9581
    @jasmine9581 4 года назад +2

    omg first one is pretty much one of my homework questions due soon

  • @maximocaceres4685
    @maximocaceres4685 5 месяцев назад

    this is way nicer than the line of charge problem, atleast you dont have to do a crazy trigometric subsitution

  • @theanonimo26able
    @theanonimo26able 4 года назад +1

    Thank you so much man you really help a lot

  • @MathewsSumba
    @MathewsSumba 11 месяцев назад

    I love this tutor ❤❤❤

  • @eszterannaimre711
    @eszterannaimre711 4 месяца назад

    Youre saving my degree again

  • @cekulamtina6663
    @cekulamtina6663 6 лет назад +1

    god bless u man thank u for all lecture videos

  • @bhavitilwani1545
    @bhavitilwani1545 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks bro you the real MVP

  • @Walid-xx1xr
    @Walid-xx1xr 2 года назад

    Thanks for the save, Like Always♥️

  • @TobyLuedders
    @TobyLuedders 4 месяца назад

    W mans. Bro never fails

  • @KarausMiller
    @KarausMiller 5 лет назад +1

    Awesome! Helpful tutorial

  • @denizsoydan8235
    @denizsoydan8235 3 года назад +2

    But.. didn't we ignore the "+c" for the indefinite integral? Was it somehow definite, did I miss it? Did we say from 0 to Q or something like that?

    • @sunildhaul2397
      @sunildhaul2397 3 года назад +1

      You're correct. No definite integral was taken therefore some constant c should come into the picture. We can then determine c by substituting E=0 when Q=0, which gives us c=0. Note that after indefinite integration, we get E as a function of Q i.e E = f(Q) + c.
      Another way of doing this is to look at an indefinite integral as always being a sum of all infinitesimal parts when applied to a given situation. In this case, we do not need to use definite integral since we know the integral of small E i.e. dE in this situation is the sum of all dEs over the cirumference and the integral of dQ is the sum of all dQs over the cirumference, which is clearly E (net electric field) and Q (total charge on ring) respectively. So, either use definite integral or indefinite integral sum approach.

  • @ogunahdauglas9330
    @ogunahdauglas9330 2 года назад

    Thank you
    From kenya🇰🇪🇰🇪

  • @fur7i236
    @fur7i236 6 лет назад +1

    bro u r a life saver.....thanks

  • @jaykhosia9353
    @jaykhosia9353 7 лет назад +2

    Thank you so much, sir, for making it easy for us. (Y)

  • @NeoTechVision101
    @NeoTechVision101 9 месяцев назад

    Clearest explanation

  • @ronny_ranks
    @ronny_ranks 5 лет назад +1

    You are a legend....thanks⭐

  • @sofianetakouk540
    @sofianetakouk540 4 года назад +1

    thank u soooooooooooooooooooo much dude. just genius

  • @daniellaughoc4003
    @daniellaughoc4003 3 года назад +1

    How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?

  • @saligia0743
    @saligia0743 Год назад

    That's help me soo much but I have question in the Last equation we got if x=0,x>>0, x

  • @oscarkholopha2959
    @oscarkholopha2959 6 лет назад +1

    you the best xem. god bless you

  • @tobiaschapinda6771
    @tobiaschapinda6771 3 года назад

    A thin circular ring, of radius 20cm, is charged, with a uniform charge density(rho). If a small section, of 1cm length, is removed from the ring. Calculate the electric field intensity at the center of the ring.

  • @hassanabdulmezeed6965
    @hassanabdulmezeed6965 2 года назад

    thank you this really helped me

  • @regnas7868
    @regnas7868 6 лет назад +3

    I don't know why R doesn't change?? I understand that R is in terms of a and x which they are constant; However, if dq will be in another position on the ring, u will not have a right triangle to use the Pythagorean theorem to find R in terms of X and a; therefore, R is not constant. Please correct me. Thank you.

    • @tagekumarpaul7474
      @tagekumarpaul7474 6 лет назад +1

      No matter where you draw the line from the ring to point p R will be the same value.

    • @regnas7868
      @regnas7868 6 лет назад +5

      I figured it out after looking at it again, the problem was that i was looking at it in 2 dimension. However, in a 3 dimension space, the point P is above the circle which will give a right triangle in all cases. It was just a issue of imagination lol

    • @tagekumarpaul7474
      @tagekumarpaul7474 6 лет назад +1

      Haha I was struggling with the calculus portion of this too. Cheers mate

    • @regnas7868
      @regnas7868 6 лет назад

      Good luck man :)

    • @tagekumarpaul7474
      @tagekumarpaul7474 6 лет назад

      Thanks u too

  • @sphystius9031
    @sphystius9031 4 года назад +1

    Wow ... this is so much simpler

  • @emxoco
    @emxoco Год назад

    youre truly a life saver

  • @philangezwitsabedze9483
    @philangezwitsabedze9483 4 года назад +1

    wow, this is very helpful

  • @elvisvasquez7553
    @elvisvasquez7553 Год назад

    One thing I never understood is why is λ ds = dQ. If λ is already the amount of charge per unit of length, why do we need to multiply it by ds?

  • @jesusmrosario-claudio4104
    @jesusmrosario-claudio4104 4 года назад +1

    Thank you once again.

  • @lefterisspanoudakis3152
    @lefterisspanoudakis3152 2 года назад

    How can we prove using math, and not symmetry, that the y-components are add up to zero? Can we take the integral of dE_y from 0 to 2πα or we must calculate two or more integrals because the sign of the y-component is changing?

  • @mariopike
    @mariopike 5 лет назад +1

    you are amazing!! Thank you for exist;)

  • @nickwang5687
    @nickwang5687 23 дня назад

    way better than my teacher

  • @themoon8671
    @themoon8671 7 лет назад +2

    Thanks alot
    U R GREAT

  • @beyzanursahin2159
    @beyzanursahin2159 5 лет назад +1

    helped a lot thanks :)

  • @ashadulislamrony7692
    @ashadulislamrony7692 9 месяцев назад

    Nice Class

  • @alexmichaelsafayan1814
    @alexmichaelsafayan1814 2 года назад +2

    How is R a constant? 7:00 - the logic here does not make sense

    • @mobilegameplay2090
      @mobilegameplay2090 2 года назад

      Yep I did not get it as well

    • @clioosesli4646
      @clioosesli4646 Год назад

      Because the distance from any point of the ring to the point where we are finding the electric field won't change that's why R is a constant

    • @alexsafayan7684
      @alexsafayan7684 Год назад +1

      @@clioosesli4646 but that is simply not true… take, for example, the left most point on the ring vs the right most point on the ring. the distance from each of those points to the point of interest is different

    • @clioosesli4646
      @clioosesli4646 Год назад

      @@alexsafayan7684 how ?
      Okay it's a ring right?
      Okay just take a ring shaped bangle or anything and a wooden stick or a pen then pass it through the centre of the ring then you will see that no matter it's from the right left or top bottom or any point the distance is same

    • @alexmichaelsafayan1814
      @alexmichaelsafayan1814 Год назад +1

      @@clioosesli4646 Oh wow, I think I've been interpreting this as a 2D problem, when in reality, the ring is "facing" the point of interest, correct?

  • @petermoon9473
    @petermoon9473 2 года назад

    💯💯💯💯 life saverr

  • @SamSam-tn9uh
    @SamSam-tn9uh Год назад

    I love you Bro❤️

  • @metalks3716
    @metalks3716 4 года назад

    this is the problem with our society, the video that has a lot of informative and useful content has only a few thousand views, but a video of bear climbing mountain has millions of views.what do you think.??

  • @v.m.5850
    @v.m.5850 4 года назад

    Why isn’t the linear charge density inserted before integrating?

    • @sunildhaul2397
      @sunildhaul2397 3 года назад

      You could do that also and still you will get the same answer. In place of dQ you would use charge per unit length X dl where dl is an infinitesimal length along the circumference. You would then get E net in terms of linear charge density.

    • @daniellaughoc4003
      @daniellaughoc4003 3 года назад

      @@sunildhaul2397 How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?

    • @sunildhaul2397
      @sunildhaul2397 3 года назад

      @@daniellaughoc4003 , it will ultimately give the same end result except that now your final formula obtained after integration would be having linear charge density in it.

    • @loucimouadi3983
      @loucimouadi3983 3 года назад

      I don't understand why he didn't integrate directly dE?

    • @gnyszbr4187
      @gnyszbr4187 2 года назад

      @@sunildhaul2397 will that be the same for all uniformly distributed charges? Is it ok if I do not use density and just integrate dq for those type of questions but with different shapes with uniformly distributed charges?

  • @arinzeanthony7447
    @arinzeanthony7447 2 года назад

    Please when is E=p/£and when is it p/£.
    Where E= Electric field
    P= charge density
    £= permittivity of free space.

  • @wahidhamidy6886
    @wahidhamidy6886 7 лет назад +1

    thanks a lot bro!!!!

  • @malakfalkoun1280
    @malakfalkoun1280 Год назад

    Sir I love you 😔

  • @verrawar7906
    @verrawar7906 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much .

  • @AHMEDALFourjani1998
    @AHMEDALFourjani1998 7 лет назад

    Thank you so much

  • @marinachamsi4702
    @marinachamsi4702 5 лет назад

    you are the best

  • @AmanKumar-pj4bb
    @AmanKumar-pj4bb 5 лет назад

    Thanks a lot

  • @KinGxWolF
    @KinGxWolF 7 лет назад +1

    Thank you!!!

  • @AyabongaZwelethu
    @AyabongaZwelethu Год назад

    thank you

  • @aymanmohammed2530
    @aymanmohammed2530 3 месяца назад

    Thanks buddy

  • @relaxationvideoszzmedozz341
    @relaxationvideoszzmedozz341 4 года назад

    كفو يالزلم 👍🏻

  • @Ali_Hussain2004
    @Ali_Hussain2004 7 месяцев назад

    Thanks

  • @ahmadshayain
    @ahmadshayain 5 лет назад

    Thanks man

  • @alexmccann101
    @alexmccann101 5 лет назад

    thanks!

  • @abd1428
    @abd1428 4 года назад

    thank u

  • @troymills2614
    @troymills2614 7 лет назад +1

    Why wasn't the linear charge density inserted into the point charge equation before integration, after pulling out the constants you should have been integrating d(theta) = theta. Which would have cancelled out the 2pi leaving only KQ/(x^2+a^2)^3/2 = 2.05*10^5 N/C !!

    • @NikkaPleeease
      @NikkaPleeease 7 лет назад

      The denominator should be (x^2+a^2)^3/2, not R^3.... I think you're right!

    • @v.m.5850
      @v.m.5850 4 года назад +1

      I have the same question, I know this is late but have you figured out why?

    • @daniellaughoc4003
      @daniellaughoc4003 3 года назад

      @@NikkaPleeease How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?

    • @Sarah-jr8qv
      @Sarah-jr8qv 2 года назад

      @@NikkaPleeease it's the same because R= sqrt of x^2+a^2 which equals to (x^2+a^2)^1/2 so R^3 = (x^2+a^2)^3/2

  • @user-wg9iy2nk3t
    @user-wg9iy2nk3t 10 месяцев назад

    anyone who knows his name?

  • @EggPuffsEdge
    @EggPuffsEdge 5 лет назад

    Please do behind the scene video sir

  • @hasanshirvanov5290
    @hasanshirvanov5290 3 года назад

    Təşəkkürlər

  • @hossiluc
    @hossiluc 5 лет назад

    I love it

  • @Coldbreezed
    @Coldbreezed 4 года назад

    Listen to MOS (Battery Full) by Lil Peep and tell me that he doesnt sound like this guy

  • @orangeguy9166
    @orangeguy9166 Год назад

    love you

  • @minutechips9414
    @minutechips9414 4 года назад

    LOL did he say 50 nanocloobs

  • @hasny9688
    @hasny9688 8 месяцев назад

    adam ya adam

  • @boomperson818
    @boomperson818 Год назад

    i feel so dumb

  • @ahmadahmadi5468
    @ahmadahmadi5468 3 года назад

  • @jstroner
    @jstroner 5 лет назад

    You are thee shit👍🏻

  • @FatShady15
    @FatShady15 4 года назад

    Why was i randomly unsubscribed... Wtf youtube?!?

  • @manav-ty1oj
    @manav-ty1oj Год назад

    God

  • @edoupdates9935
    @edoupdates9935 4 года назад

    I love u

  • @sanawaqas9918
    @sanawaqas9918 3 месяца назад

    He is the best . Someone plz tell me his insta or twitter id. I want to see this genius