It’s the Indian version (Maruti Suzuki) they export to Latin America as well as the Indian market and Africa. Japanese versions have five stars, that’s what we get in Australia.
@@jashanbadoga4851 yeah, give money to buy the sport ir hybrid version (Japan) and I'll do it. You see, I don't know where you are from, but in my country cars are very expensive.
@@ayushghosh1155 Mahindra and Tata design are crap even though the safety are awesome... They didn't sell well outside India... Even here in Indonesia, lot of people don't like Tata and Mahindra design (except Thar)... We like Toyota design more... Mostly Innova
Overall, I avoid Sub-compact vehicles personally. It might be ideal if you live in a dense city and tend to stick around downtown.... Otherwise even the GOOD models that score well.... Are seriously inferior safety-wise when they encounter a crash with larger cars and SUV's. You don't have enough crumple zone to slow the deceleration even when the occupant cab stays intact. It is just not something I would want my family on the road with. I do recall seeing this Suzuki, on some auto enthusiast channel, Maybe Doug Demuro??? Where they were praising the inexpensive cost and tech value and discussing how it was a shame it is not available in the US. Meh, I think we can live without it. It is one thing if you only ever drove it a max of 35mph... but people do 80 in these. Stick with the Civic/Focus/Jetta/Corolla/Elantra threshold... These "Compact" cars are much more adequate in safety, and much more comfortable to drive, and are really not much more money.
hey this is the swift sold in developing markets like India and Latin America. The swifts sold in Australia, UK and USA were made in Japan and always scored a solid 5 star rating.
this is so much safer than the 1991 swift gti i drive. that thing is like a tinbox on wheels with too much power. i love it but i would not want to be in a accident with that. i´m safer on my motorcicle tbh but i don´t drive with the intention to crash or i would never go on a bike.
Who else here believes it's still a reasonably safe car for the market intended. The structure resisted and absorbed the impacts visually very well. No idea about the dummy loads but even the side impact implied the mannequin didn't hit a pillar (as the B pillar is further back).
@@st-pierre7157 Yaa absolutely but still many stupid fools will prefer this Tin over safety. Also There are many good rated cars Available in india. But Suzuki is so deep rooted in indians blood that they will purchase it. Whats why Suzuki alone have 50% market share in India
It should be stated that this is the indian version sold in india and other undeveloped countries, it has much worse safety standards and worse equipment than the European version to lower the price.
Swift is the splendor of all cars. Awaiting for all new strong hybrid Swift providing 30+kmpl. Who wants safety when driving under city bumper to bumper traffic. Even if it's scores "A big ZERO" still i don't give a F**K about global NCAP.
Stupid people thinks that safety is represented by NCAP scoring. To be honest, i'm asking myself how a Smart could have passed safety tests. If you had a head-on collision when driving a smart , someone needs to collect yourself with a vacuum cleaner
This must be the Indian built lower grade model sold in 3rd world markets, I assume. The Sport model from Japan is sold in Europe where such dismal crash results would be unacceptable to go on sale. Seems like 3rd world lives are less valuable that first world lives.....as usual.
Ok, even the renault zoe got 0 stars in the latest tests. previous tests ranked THE SAME ZOE as 5 stars. Someone should think a little more deeply about this instead of barely counting the number of stars ;-)
Previous tests had way less safety requirements. You can go to the Latin NCAP report to see what the result of this was, basically, the driver and passenger would either have a terrible injury, or be dead (neck injury)
@@juamont That's the point: if previous tests ranked 5 stars to a car that can cause dead people, i think ncap test are trash. What can assure me that today's ones are reliable? Simply it is only a matter of period. Most probably nowadays cars that rank 5 stars will be ranked 2 or less three years later. So most a relative than an objective safety evaluation.
@@gasparinizuzzurro6306 It's because you simply don't understand that as times move on, safety requirements change as well. It is called technological advancement. As more car chassis designs get more complex and advanced, the safety requirements goes with it. Ensuring that manufacturers don't rely on decades old outdated designs simply because the security requirements. Imagine if we kept the security standards of 1950's... we wouldn't have airbags and we wouldn't have crash crumble zones.
@@bighit20100 I understand that safety requirements change over time. As every other tech aspect, (for example limitations in engine emissions). What is a bit ridiculus is that NCAP set arbitrary standards and score safety can pass from 5 stars to 0 in a time of 1 years because they simply say that if you do not have a relatively useful feature your car go from the BEST SAFE CAR to an absolute piece of shitty metal. It is simply ridiculus rate with today requirements a car whose first year of production was 5 years ago and whose safety rate was high at the time of launch
0 star🤔, the front windscreen and pillar didnt crush into driver or passenger, hows that equate to a zero star,,,,,, it seams to me to get 5 stars u need fancy beepers, beepers dont work after an impact ,its tge actual body shell around u and airbags,seatbelts that matters, not lane change assist,aeb,etcc
@@ayushk4099 I heard that Indonesian made Ertiga scored 4 stars while Indian made Ertiga scored 3 stars while having similar amount of airbag (2 airbags)
Stupid it is in diffrent country and their parameter diffrent . Swift in europ better quality than India and this test only based on pillar a,b and c material. In Indian version 2 rating not 0
SUZUKI I like the design and interior of your car! But the car you produce has a bad front frame and a body that cracks like paper when hit when hit. The frame is destroyed
But we are Indians will buy maruthi manufacturing cars if gets zero stars also because they will provide very high mileage and lower price ,we don't care about our lives and our family...
india 5 star rating car ka accident hone par bhe kuch nahe bachta . 5 star ka mtlb ye nahe ke 140-160 kmph pe bhe kuch nahe hoga , 5 star bas 80kmph tak hota hai , vo bhe luck by chance
Must be Indian version lol.... I'm not going to tell that indian version is bad, but even the South East Asian version of Ertiga is much more safer and has more star at safety than the Indian version
This is not the "Made in india" swift. As it says "Latin NCAP" this car is made in brazil for mexico, cuba and brazil. However, both share the same DNA.
It’s the Indian version (Maruti Suzuki) they export to Latin America as well as the Indian market and Africa. Japanese versions have five stars, that’s what we get in Australia.
Does the SPORT versión have 5 stars? (The SPORT is the one with the turbo engine)
Mine it's 2023 in Mexico and they brought it from Japan
@@gerardo9052si wey, desde el facelift de 2019 ya los traen desde la fábrica de Japón
@@gerardo9052 Yes i have one in France and the serial number and all parts of the car are identified from Japan !
@@lologano
Si es boosterjet o glx es de japon
If we went back to 1998 this car would get 20 stars.
If it was 1998 the car would bend easily like a aluminium can
@@leandrobarradas8589 You’re not the smartest I can see
Specific cars made in 1998 would perform better than this
Ikr
It’s not 1998 and five stars is the highest result.
The glass didn’t shatter that’s better, but side curtain airbags are more safer than what the car had performed.
The frontal doesn't look too bad. I mean it's still bad, but damn that side impact looks awful.
@Jg235 not on the cx5
The steering wheel frontal doesn't looks so bad,because It's in slow motion,it actually injured the neck.
@@Dongzzzzzz Why compare an SUV to a small car?
@@qswedasf that recently did well on the side impact compared to its suv rival plus read again, the guy said "any car" not the swift.
Fiat Panda: finally a worthy opponent, our battle will be legendary
Meanwhile dummies died during the Swift ncap test will be saying" dear suzuki why you are always sooooo cruel to me"
Mine has 6 air bags, ESP and all kinds of assist systems like emergency braking etc. It also has isofix. Is this the Indian version????
If someone want to die. Try indian made swift 😂
@@jashanbadoga4851 yeah, give money to buy the sport ir hybrid version (Japan) and I'll do it. You see, I don't know where you are from, but in my country cars are very expensive.
yea it's the Indian version.
when you look at the 2005 version which has side airbags aswell this new model looks horrible to crash in
If it's made out of tin, it could last longer than its owner
Side airbags are available if choose the safety package.
Millions of satisfied Swift buyers be like.....WHAT A HOLY CRAP!!
Na man the Suzuki’s you buy in India are dog shit in Mexico we buy the Suzuki’s made in Japan
@@xxgeorgegamingxx9016 You buy a Mahindra or Tata car which are Indian brands....there cars have 5 star safety rating
@@xxgeorgegamingxx9016 Cannot believe I found another GF Gaming account on a NCAP VIDEO!!! What are the odds?
Satisfied until one day... dead
@@ayushghosh1155 Mahindra and Tata design are crap even though the safety are awesome... They didn't sell well outside India... Even here in Indonesia, lot of people don't like Tata and Mahindra design (except Thar)... We like Toyota design more... Mostly Innova
Overall, I avoid Sub-compact vehicles personally. It might be ideal if you live in a dense city and tend to stick around downtown.... Otherwise even the GOOD models that score well.... Are seriously inferior safety-wise when they encounter a crash with larger cars and SUV's. You don't have enough crumple zone to slow the deceleration even when the occupant cab stays intact. It is just not something I would want my family on the road with. I do recall seeing this Suzuki, on some auto enthusiast channel, Maybe Doug Demuro??? Where they were praising the inexpensive cost and tech value and discussing how it was a shame it is not available in the US. Meh, I think we can live without it. It is one thing if you only ever drove it a max of 35mph... but people do 80 in these. Stick with the Civic/Focus/Jetta/Corolla/Elantra threshold... These "Compact" cars are much more adequate in safety, and much more comfortable to drive, and are really not much more money.
hey this is the swift sold in developing markets like India and Latin America. The swifts sold in Australia, UK and USA were made in Japan and always scored a solid 5 star rating.
There are several types of swift. This is the Indian one. The Hungarian one scored much better results.
Indian uncles favourite brand...
In the Golf VIII the rear door opened as well after the side crash and they didn't mention anything. Euroncap just sucks, IIHS does a better job.
Cabe resaltar que la versión india es la que no es muy segura la japonesa tiene 5 estrellas 🔥🇯🇵👌
Si 👍
this is so much safer than the 1991 swift gti i drive. that thing is like a tinbox on wheels with too much power. i love it but i would not want to be in a accident with that. i´m safer on my motorcicle tbh but i don´t drive with the intention to crash or i would never go on a bike.
Wow, this is a tin can on wheels. No wonder Suzuki was off charts for America at about 2012-2013, sheeeesh!!! 🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿🤦🏿
Why the golf 8 passed the test with an open rear door and not the swift
Who else here believes it's still a reasonably safe car for the market intended. The structure resisted and absorbed the impacts visually very well.
No idea about the dummy loads but even the side impact implied the mannequin didn't hit a pillar (as the B pillar is further back).
The car still did poorly. The energy to the dummy would have been significant.
Marooti owner
Still it's a tin can
Reasonably safe car? Are you brain damaged?
🤣 Still this *Tin* have more sales
Yet, it still sells like hotcakes in a lot of world countries 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Where does it sell tho??
@@st-pierre7157 Idk about European edition. But this Tin is famous in India since many many yrs & still it is. Even though rating is garbage
@@shetty98 Oh man. The Euro Spec has scored 4 stars in EuroNcap. Indian spec has soo low grade safety?? People should avoid buying that
@@st-pierre7157 Yaa absolutely but still many stupid fools will prefer this Tin over safety. Also There are many good rated cars Available in india. But Suzuki is so deep rooted in indians blood that they will purchase it. Whats why Suzuki alone have 50% market share in India
Well just drive safely..🙏🔥💯👌🤣😅😂
2022
Ese es hecho en la India 🇮🇳
El japones vayan a las pruebas de eurocap
I had a swift 31 years ago love 2 have put it through this test....
How is it still on sale. Just save some extra cash and get yourself a volvo.
is Volvo in India?
@@tb_bfb There's literally every manufacturer European/Asian manufacturers in India
They should literally double the insurance bill of this thing.
For what paper is used for body
It should be stated that this is the indian version sold in india and other undeveloped countries, it has much worse safety standards and worse equipment than the European version to lower the price.
Wouldn't expect much on LCGC
Swift is the splendor of all cars. Awaiting for all new strong hybrid Swift providing 30+kmpl. Who wants safety when driving under city bumper to bumper traffic. Even if it's scores "A big ZERO" still i don't give a F**K about global NCAP.
tard, if they can't even get 1 star crash rating, what hopes do you have for their garbage "hybrid" system? It will catch fire for sure
Stupid people thinks that safety is represented by NCAP scoring. To be honest, i'm asking myself how a Smart could have passed safety tests. If you had a
head-on collision when driving a smart , someone needs to collect yourself with a vacuum cleaner
Plss Do the Toyota Yaris/ Vios Sedan
This must be the Indian built lower grade model sold in 3rd world markets, I assume. The Sport model from Japan is sold in Europe where such dismal crash results would be unacceptable to go on sale.
Seems like 3rd world lives are less valuable that first world lives.....as usual.
Yes we are considered 3rd class humans! I don't why
Ok, even the renault zoe got 0 stars in the latest tests. previous tests ranked THE SAME ZOE as 5 stars.
Someone should think a little more deeply about this instead of barely counting the number of stars ;-)
Previous tests had way less safety requirements. You can go to the Latin NCAP report to see what the result of this was, basically, the driver and passenger would either have a terrible injury, or be dead (neck injury)
@@juamont That's the point: if previous tests ranked 5 stars to a car that can cause dead people, i think ncap test are trash. What can assure me that today's ones are reliable?
Simply it is only a matter of period.
Most probably nowadays cars that rank 5 stars will be ranked 2 or less three years later. So most a relative than an objective safety evaluation.
@@gasparinizuzzurro6306 It's because you simply don't understand that as times move on, safety requirements change as well. It is called technological advancement. As more car chassis designs get more complex and advanced, the safety requirements goes with it. Ensuring that manufacturers don't rely on decades old outdated designs simply because the security requirements. Imagine if we kept the security standards of 1950's... we wouldn't have airbags and we wouldn't have crash crumble zones.
@@bighit20100 I understand that safety requirements change over time. As every other tech aspect, (for example limitations in engine emissions). What is a bit ridiculus is that NCAP set arbitrary standards and score safety can pass from 5 stars to 0 in a time of 1 years because they simply say that if you do not have a relatively useful feature your car go from the BEST SAFE CAR to an absolute piece of shitty metal. It is simply ridiculus rate with today requirements a car whose first year of production was 5 years ago and whose safety rate was high at the time of launch
പപ്പടം സേർ🤣
Still top
On sales
My aunt drives one of these and I showed this to her. Anyone want a used Swift?
0 star🤔, the front windscreen and pillar didnt crush into driver or passenger, hows that equate to a zero star,,,,,, it seams to me to get 5 stars u need fancy beepers, beepers dont work after an impact ,its tge actual body shell around u and airbags,seatbelts that matters, not lane change assist,aeb,etcc
There was no impact in cabin still it got zero if it was tata in same situation they could have given 4-5 star.😂
What's the result ?
The result is, that it's garbage
its the Indian not Japanese
Is the Japanese worse or better?
@@rosemaryfriedw124a8 In India they use cheaper material in chassis to cut cost
Japanese varient would be better
Japanese variation scored 4 stars in EuroNcap I think or somewhat like that. This Indian aspect model has nothing
@@ayushk4099 I heard that Indonesian made Ertiga scored 4 stars while Indian made Ertiga scored 3 stars while having similar amount of airbag (2 airbags)
@@rosemaryfriedw124a8 Cost cutting is mostly done in hatchback segment cars but higher models from Suzuki are much better like Vitara and Scross
Swift 👑
It's is the Maruti Suzuki, not real Suzuki.
new car......
Man a 2021 car with not lateral airbags
Stupid it is in diffrent country and their parameter diffrent .
Swift in europ better quality than India and this test only based on pillar a,b and c material.
In Indian version 2 rating not 0
Why not drive safe which car doesn't matter
Swift hybrid?
NO,this is impossible it needs to have 3 stars no 0 stars
Well according to safer cars for India 2012 swift and 2005 swift got 5 stars but 2021 swift is even worse
Keep in mind that they crash entry level cars
So it’s a car for townies and if you go over 30kph your dead in a head on collision? Where’s the 200kph head on vs a Ute test
SI'WTF'
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
SUZUKI I like the design and interior of your car! But the car you produce has a bad front frame and a body that cracks like paper when hit when hit. The frame is destroyed
Objective.. to discourage buyers from purchase .. to protect self vehicle industry. IMHO.
But we are Indians will buy maruthi manufacturing cars if gets zero stars also because they will provide very high mileage and lower price ,we don't care about our lives and our family...
thodi or मजबूती की जरूरत है swift ko gadi bast h mere Pass bi h मेंटेनेंस तो बहुत कम है
Hi
Zero stars? Bulls***. NCAP must be out of their mind. Or just running out of things to do… If you can survive a crash, - it’s approved.
ആരോട് പറയാൻ! ആര് കേൾക്കാൻ😅
Absolutely lovely thing to own if you want to die.
Such a weist car
india 5 star rating car ka accident hone par bhe kuch nahe bachta .
5 star ka mtlb ye nahe ke 140-160 kmph pe bhe kuch nahe hoga , 5 star bas 80kmph tak hota hai , vo bhe luck by chance
First swift was the best for around 5 years... Then it became the worst🙏
When you love fuel efficiency more than your life get a MS.
Must be Indian version lol.... I'm not going to tell that indian version is bad, but even the South East Asian version of Ertiga is much more safer and has more star at safety than the Indian version
Philippines has the Swift
@@harshmallowiee wow philipines are lucky then
Super
I think maruti is begging to get atheist 1 star
Suzuki cars got 5 star in Europe but only in india they are playing with the life of Indians . Govt. should ban maruti suzuki
Bhot ward 🔥🔥🔥
My girl friend fan this car 🎉
Interesting ancap and ncap get better results. Someone’s biased.
Tata is better then maruti Suzuki swift, always supporting Tata, Jay hind 🇮🇳.
Pappad💥
പപ്പടം 🌝💥
Come si fa a produrre ancora auto così?
പപ്പടം ultra max plus , still on top sale 🥴
🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴💀💀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Clickbait
Thats why sales figure is gud in every month 😀😀😀😀in India 😂😂😂😂wake up suzuki lovers 😂😂😂
Thing is You cant get fast enough to make this much of a DMG..
That's why i don't see someone In a Suzuki
Car en France il y a eu 3 stars
Why thiw so famous car is tin can
still it is top selling hatchback car in india 😂
That particular car is for the indian market only
@@seanalicante7299 Yes and that's why it's tested in latin-america.... 🤨
No side airbag?!!
Side airbags are available if you choose the safety package
@@Neverevernebaneba It should be standard!
@@AR-1806 If want it choose a more expensive car
I bambini sono seduti su seggiolini che dovrebbero guardare avanti, invece guardano il fondo della macchina.
Está es la versión india.
sheeeesh
Why my favourite brand is failed 😭😭
it's Suzuki India aka Maruti Suzuki so it's going to be unsafe
Suzuki is now a failed company because of poor crash test ratings
But youcan but the vitara and s cross apso brezza
Maruti is destroying suzuki brand name
Ada 2 airbag kok nilai crash test cuma nol
Y kan overall score tetep 0 .. yg dinilai kan bukan cuma airbagnya aja
Maruti sazuki Bakwas Company
Ah non pardon je crois que tu parles français mais je pense que ça doit être pas les mêmes les mêmes d'affaires tu vois
Well, you get what you paid for.
Ese es el Maruti y es de la India, el bueno que es el japonés es el que llega a Europa 🤦
April fooling people's.make same speed the oposite object,then give stars.ok crash testers.
This is South Indian pappadam vandi.
Maruti Suzuki Swift
Fuddu matal use in it ,
That's very light weight
Fish tin
അതുതന്നെ..... പപ്പടം 😆😆
This is not a car❌ PLASTIC ✔️
PROWD TO BE AN INDIAN 😂😂😂
This is not the "Made in india" swift. As it says "Latin NCAP" this car is made in brazil for mexico, cuba and brazil.
However, both share the same DNA.
Suzuki please leave the automotive world and only make motorcycles, the world of cars its not for you