Stay away from any type of volks and old fords when it comes to safety, volks parts are hard to get and has cheap body old fords that are not muscle have so many factory issues example the pinto or the focus
@Juliano Moraesoli Yes, but the dummy's "bones" are made of steel. Which is actually denser than human bones. So the fact the steel neck snapped off like that means that a real driver would have definitely been killed in this crash.
in Brasil/ China in his moment are much popular that i think the chinese car makers copy this quality model car lol and in Brasil because Latin american no have good regulations .
That Volkswagen Santana is a whole new level of scary. The fact that the entire front half of the car practically disintegrated on contact is just worrying
Those tests were different than most of the rest. It was a solid full height wall instead of the half wall/median. A tall flat concrete wall is much less forgiving.
9:15 I grew up in China and my neighbor - a lovely mid-aged couple lost their only son, with whom I hung out quite often as a kid, in a VW Satana (Passat B2) in an accident. He was driving under influence, the car crashed into another car and rolled into a ditch, killing 3 out of 4. I cannot forget when my mother told me on the phone "Li is not here anymore." The family soon disintegrated because it was just too heavy for them to get over with. My father told me Li was driving under influence but the car wasn't speeding. It cramped into a pile of steel. It could have been prevented, but Volkswagen, for their own benefit, sold this model with quarter century old safety features until 2007. They praise this car to be a sales legend, but I will never forgive it.
Sorry to hear about that. Wish car manufacturers would care less about sales when it comes to the danger they put their drivers into. It makes no sense, this VW should have even been legal in the first place
ChrisCarGuy - Hi Chris :) it’s okay. Let him say whatever he wants to. This world, including the internet is such a place. Not all things get straight in the end, not all mankind are kind, but that’s okay. It’s more important that you have a happy and safe day, wherever you are.
WOW!!! 0:30 - Ford 'Guillotine' Sierra 9:15 - Volkswagon 'Uber- Kompact I' Santana 13:08 - Volkswagon 'Uber Kompact II' T3 13:50 - Comodore 'Quick Mincer' THESE ARE THE WORST, IN MY OPINION. Hopefully people were dettered from buying these vehicles if they were lucky enough to see any of this footage before purchase.
Someone said the commodore had 1000 kg of sand in it and that is what made the car crash bad My dad was in that car and crashed it and he is still alive so I don’t see it being bad
Fun fact: If the car stays perfectly intact after the crash, that's also bad. To get a good score in these tests, the car's engine bay, and ONLY the engine bay, should crumple upon impact. That way the shock is absorbed by the car and not passed to the passengers.
i saw ppl mention it was the indian verison or smth. Apparently they remove a bunch of features to save costs etc.. hopefully i dont think you can drive too fast over there. But still. VW have some of the safest cars out there so i was surprised to see a quite recent polo here, even tho it performed the best@@quelandil5738
The Ford Sierra was by far the worst, the steering column/wheel will literally decapitate you. I'm quite shocked at how badly the Citroen Saxo did considering this was aimed toward younger drivers who invariably have more accidents, you'd think closer attention would have been made to the safety aspect.
@@Tezorus well, the next ones must have been better, I bought one brand new in 99 (saxo) it had side impact and airbags. Never crashed it on the 2 years, 38k miles I had it mind. Think this was why they redesign it, the peugeot 106 was the same car.
I remember the time when the chinese "Landwind" made it to the european market in the early 2000s. It failed the important crash tests because the vehicle safety was equal to the safety standards from the 1960s. The dutch importer, who was responsible for the sale on the european market, said that you cannot expect perfect safety for only 15.000 Euro...
I find it somewhat disturbing to see the crash test with the sierra, as it is awfully close to what can happen in reality with that car. A little over 20 years ago, my girlfriend and I were on a winter holiday in Norway. On the way back to our cabin, we were some of the first on the scene after a traffic accident where a vw transporter and a ford sierra had collided. Almost nothing had happened to the transporter, where the driver had only received a wound on the shin. On the other hand, the female driver of the Sierra had unfortunately experienced the same thing as you see in this video. The steering wheel had completely smashed her jaw, the dashboard had folded around her and her seat had been pushed into the B pillar and bent it. It was therefore not possible to get her out. She was still alive but unconscious. While we waited for the ambulance I tried to make sure she could breathe, but unfortunately she succumbed to her injuries shortly before the ambulance arrived. Hope she could feel that someone was with her until the end.
I was driving back home from visiting family and saw a brand new Ford F-150 in the ditch upside down, hazards still going off. I went up to it and the roof had been completely flattened, looked like the roof was just gone the hood and tailgate were touching the ground, there was no window opening to see inside but the truck was still running so I called 911. While I was waiting for the ambulance they said to find any occupants and make sure they are breathing. I managed to lever the door a bit, and just saw airbag, moved it out of the way and felt someone’s wet shoulder, but all I saw was red, and their shoulder was so close to the ground I realized they had no head and the wet I was feeling was his obliterated skull and all the blood leaking onto the roof… I just sat on the side of the road I was so horrified the ambulance arrived and thought I was part of the accident I was in such a shocked state.
Wow what an awful thing to experience. I guess at the very least, as you said, hopefully you made the woman feel less anxiety knowing someone was there trying to help... :(
From what I've heard, the crash test of the old Holden Commodore at 13:45 wasn't actually to test the car, it was to test the newly built facility. They ran it at far greater speeds than typical crash tests, and had removed some structural integrity of the vehicle prior to the test.
@@AbderianForge Yeah, but 40 mph to 0 mph in an instant is still going to ruin someone's day! 40 mph doesn't seem that fast these days, but that is still significant momentum capable of doing a lot of damage.
@@1965vw - Walk into the edge of a door at 2 mph and see what sudden stop is like. 40 mph is 400 times as much kinetic energy as 2 mph. ke = ½mv². It's that little ² that's the killer.
Old cars: Built sturdy so as not to take damage when crashed, more likely to injure the passengers Modern cars: Built to crumple when crashed in order to keep the passengers safer Sierra 91: Built to shove steering column through driver's head
13:45 is invalid. The Holden Commodore they used in this test had some of its structural integrity removed and also was run at much higher speeds than normal testing. The purpose in this instance wasn’t to test the safety of the car, rather ensure the testing equipment could withstand the forces of the crashes as it was a brand new facility and they were ensuring the equipment wouldn’t suffer any catastrophic failures. The Commodores weren’t actually near this bad in a crash.
I don't know if this is just one of those stories you hear down at the pub, but apparently in the 50s / 60s there was a car that when involved in head-on collision would deflect the glove box open, then the sharp metal would decapitate the passenger, and finally forward inertia would result in the glove box closing it's self again. End result is that in many cases, accident responders would mysteriously find the passenger's head in the glove box. I know it seems far fetched, but back then all cars were death traps, with styling full of spikes and sharp edges.
The Commodore had previously been in a major accident. The video is to serve as a warning to anyone who might think they can repair two damaged cars by welding the “good” halves together.
The VW T3 clip wasn't a test of the vehicle, it was actually a test of the facilities as the vehicle was loaded up with concrete and crashed at over 60 mph.
@@Beelzebubby91 I am glad it was just a mock test though, the car was going more than 120 kph, crashed into a non-deformable wall and had extra weight in the back.
The Holden Commodore being in the compilation needs clarification. The car was pulled into the barrier at 100 kph (about 60 mph) to test it's "catastrophic crash integrity" after a major repair. Specifically, this was a warning against buying a car created by welding together two donor car halves. At any rate a car hitting a solid barrier at that speed will probably disintegrate.
Quite a few of those tests were done at much higher speeds than normal, that VW pickup was also loaded with extra weight in the back. The videos really for entertainment rather than education.
I laughed so hard on the second crash test -- the Ford Sierra -- when the dummy on the driver's side had his head decapitated. I don't know if I've ever seen that happen before.
@@sapnupuas6950 commonity tbh, Im aware of the fact they are well made so their quality is actually solid but.... These cars are just boring of that reason, there's nothing what I'd love about them.
As a rule of thumb: The older the car, the unsafer it is. Btw, some of these cars like the "Comodore" (whatever that is) and the "Volkswagen T3" I am fairly certain are cheap, license built copies built in China in the 90's or so. They seem to have been made with the cheapest and worst steel they could find since these cars have zero rigidity and crumble like tinfoil.
the commodore is a opal ,German car , Holden built and designed there own chassis after 2005 , lol now BMW bought it ,i think in 2018 or 19. RIP Holden
Crazy how the A-pillar completely fails in a lot of these, which in turn leads to the roof collapsing. Resulting in the driver impacting the A-pillar with their head=basilar skull fracture=instant death.
+Puercoespin 500c The polo does have airbags, in every country. Those tests were part of a survey done by the ADAC to demonstrate the importance of airbags. But the idiot running this channel didn't care.
In all fairness, the 156, Baleno, Xantia, Saxo seemed good in comparison to the rest on here. The T3 test was actually a test of the facilities, not the vehicle. They increased the speed more than usual, as well removing parts of the structure.
Likewise the Commodore test, wasn't testing the (modified,weighted,100km/h) car at all, but the facility itself. At least one of these cars was rated 3 stars, far from the 'worst'
How fast were the Santana and Commodore going?? That wasn’t a standard 35mph/60kph test. I’m guessing they were both going considerably faster, like 75/120.
Looks like, after taking some rudimentry measures and looking up the dimensions of the VW Santana, that the test at 9:17 was taken at a speed of approximately 100 km/h (62 mph), which is much higher than the speed at which standardized full frontal crashtests are being done, namely 56 km/h (35 mph). Take that into account when judging the safety of these cars. For instance, it looks like the Holden Commodore was tested at a similar (non-standard) high speed.
According to another poster on here the Commo was used to test the equipment out and not the car it's self and was indeed run into the test rig far faster than usual. No test dummies in either car as well so it looks like it indeed a test or calibration type event.
Also, another poster here stated the cars were filled with weight in the rear of them to test the equipment. These tests were definitely not for the safety of the vehicles but calibration of a new facility. The speeds were not typical and the extreme weight added to the rear end of the vehicles.
*than most other Maruti Suzukis in the segment. Some Tata, Mahindra cars are doing good bruh. Yeah in 1990s many were shit, but not now, except Maruti Suzukis many national and foreign cars are good.
@@mnd7381 yeah. Tata, Mahindra are doing exceptionally well in terms of safety. Foreign brand's like Toyota and honda are reasonably good as well. My problem is with Suzuki/Hyundai/Kia which together sell 70% of all passenger vehicles in India.
The primary distinguishing feature of most of these "bad" crashes is that the A-pillar buckles and the safety cell compresses into the occupant's space (old tests on vehicles lacking airbags notwithstanding).
I have heard that particular commodore test they had removed the engine and gearbox, had a boot full of sand and it was at 100kmh + ... To simulate exactly how those cars are driven in australia!
They drive cars without the engines and gearboxes? Such a strange bunch, the Australians! I wonder how they go so fast without the engine, telekinesis? xD
You know, what gets me isn't that some of these crashes are truly horrific; that's why these tests are run. See if the designs work. What really gets me is that an engineering team actually thought these designs WOULD work, that they would pass the tests and protect the driver and passengers!
With the cars from the 80s and early 90s (before a standardised crash test was introduced) you sort of expect it to be bad. With the more modern cars from the 2000s it is quite shocking. And also a great illustration that with car safety, you get what you pay for!
It's not about years, it's about mandated safety features like reinforced chassis and airbags(lol). In markets like EU and US, these things were mandatory for quite a while while in markets like South America and India (for which a lot of the cars tested here are made for) they are not (at least at the time of filming) and people there don't care as much or just can't afford the safety features so companies cut them, at least from the base model (on which the testing is done).
![BRASIL vs. URUGUAY [1-1] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-hWBAuxF1eY/mqdefault.jpg)
imo, the most violent crashes are:
- Ford Sierra (0:30)
- Volkswagen Santana (9:15)
- Volkswagen T3 (13:05)
- Commodore (13:45)
iirc 13:05 is actually a Chinese work truck
13:05 you can't survive that crash
that truck looks like it’s just molded aluminum as thin as the aluminum on soda cans with nothing porotecting it
Stay away from any type of volks and old fords when it comes to safety, volks parts are hard to get and has cheap body old fords that are not muscle have so many factory issues example the pinto or the focus
The Flying Hawk t3 and santana are developed in the 1970... compare it to Ford Sierra and Pontiac 1990...
Because I couldn’t find it here’s a list of cars with Timestamps
1. Alfa Romeo 156 0:11
2. Ford Sierra (1991) 0:26
3. Pontiac Transport (97-05) 0:44
4. Isuzu D-Max (2008) 1:07
5. Geeky CK-1 (2010) 1:30
6. Citron Saxo (1997) 1:50
7. Hyundai I10 2:16
8. VW Polo (2014) 2:41
9. Ford Figo (2014) 3:09
10. Opel/ Vauxhall Sintra (1999) 3:34
11. Deawoo Lanos (1997) 3:51
12. Deawoo Nubira (1998) 4:15
13. Citroën Xantia (1997) 4:46
14. Fiat Seicento (2000) 5:02
15. Mercedes C-Klasse (1997) 5:29
16. Renault Clio (1997) 5:56
17. Rover 100 (1997) 6:20
18. Suzuki Baleno (1998) 6:38
19. Ford Sierra (1995) 7:03
20. Renault Twingo (1991) 7:25
21. Fiat Cinquecento (1991) 7:50
22. Landwind/ Vauhall Frontera (96) 8:14
23. Nessan Sentra Tsuro b13 8:35
24. VW Passat Variant (1985) 8:53
25. VW Santana (1986) 9:14
26. VW Golf (1993) 9:38
27. VW Käfer (1966) 9:54
28. Chevy Astro (1996) 10:16
29. Proton Jumbuck (2003) 10:35
30. Renault Clio Mio (2011) 11:00
31. Renault Sandero (2012) 11:24
32. Suzuki Alto (BE)(2012) 11:48
33. Tata Nano (2013) 12:09
34. Chevy Aveo (2006) 12:38
35. VW T3 13:09
36. Brilliance BS6 (2007) 13:28
37. Comodore 13:47
38. Mitsubishi Express 14:19
And that’s all folks! If anything is misspelled or missing the year, that’s because all the names were pulled directly from the video and that’s all I went off. Hopefully y’all find this helpful.
Thanks dude. Your comment deserves more likes 👍
thank to you i know my car is not in this video lol. i'll still watch it tho it's pretty fun
Thanks
Nissan*
* 13"47 Holden Commodore (early 1980s)
My goodness it's almost like the Ford Sierra was actually specifically designed to kill the driver.
yea i was about to say the same thing
Don Johnson Your ass is literally sitting in the backseat after that.
the Ford Sierra was going 90km/h at that test when it hit the pole, i saw another yt video about it
Don Johnson yeah
Don Johnson lol it ripped the dummies head off XD
7:33 The steering wheel lifts just perfectly to break the driver's cranium. How nicely designed.
Lol
Just a little off the top
@RedGaming Studio the part of the skull with the brain in
Still better than whoever designed that Ford Sierra aka the guillotine
taief miah what part of the skull doesn’t have brain in
That Ford Sierra literally decapitated the dummy.
Juliano Moraesoli but it also has metal and a crash at 90 with any car kills you intently
Danniel Nikitins lol 😂😅
@Juliano Moraesoli Yes, but the dummy's "bones" are made of steel. Which is actually denser than human bones. So the fact the steel neck snapped off like that means that a real driver would have definitely been killed in this crash.
Look At Santana Results, It Got Smack down And Same With T3 Truck
and that wasn't even in an offset crash.
9:14 Volkswagen Santana: “hold up, lemme just disappear into this wall real quick”
in Brasil/ China in his moment are much popular that i think the chinese car makers copy this quality model car lol and in Brasil because Latin american no have good regulations .
"Hold up,i want to be a compact"
Horrific.
Vw. Satan. As it is called
Santana was crushed with speed muuuch above 100km/h
These are the cars we want in BeamNG Drive, not irl lol
Ya cuz only russian car mods are there which crash like a covet
these are essentially as bad as the covet and the mirimar
miramir is underrated
how about burnside special?
So true
Covet isn't that bad actually
the music makes me wanna go buy one of these cars and drive it into a wall
just mute it then
Shit,me too
Can I go?
It's creepy music. This video kind of scares me.
I call shotgun
The Ford Sierra is secretly a hitman
:)))
If only Hillary was in it.
@@TC-tm3nq I think you meant "Trump"
@@Russia_Moscow_countryhuman If Trump was in the car, the wall would deform
@@Berchol no, Trump would CREATE the wall!
That Volkswagen Santana is a whole new level of scary. The fact that the entire front half of the car practically disintegrated on contact is just worrying
it's as if the car has entered the wall, scary
Both the Santana and the T3 makes me question the 'VW are solidly built' mantra so often spoken.
Half the car literally disappeared. You would be dead ten out of ten times on that one
@@ianfrench1577 I've never heard of that. But I have heard of vws designed to crumple like a soda can, not just the crumple zone, the whole car.
Those tests were different than most of the rest. It was a solid full height wall instead of the half wall/median. A tall flat concrete wall is much less forgiving.
13:08 how to turn your T3 into a custom trailer in under 10 seconds
And leave the "trailer" intacted!
Yes
I will be using this advice in the future
It's a human salsa machine.
To be fair it was loaded with weights and was traveling much faster 🤷
That moment when you realize that you own one of these cars...
Do you?
@@they6622 No
😂
Yep, i have hyundai i10
Don't drive it full speed into an uneven wall...
9:15 I grew up in China and my neighbor - a lovely mid-aged couple lost their only son, with whom I hung out quite often as a kid, in a VW Satana (Passat B2) in an accident. He was driving under influence, the car crashed into another car and rolled into a ditch, killing 3 out of 4. I cannot forget when my mother told me on the phone "Li is not here anymore." The family soon disintegrated because it was just too heavy for them to get over with. My father told me Li was driving under influence but the car wasn't speeding. It cramped into a pile of steel. It could have been prevented, but Volkswagen, for their own benefit, sold this model with quarter century old safety features until 2007. They praise this car to be a sales legend, but I will never forgive it.
Sorry to hear about that. Wish car manufacturers would care less about sales when it comes to the danger they put their drivers into. It makes no sense, this VW should have even been legal in the first place
I find it irreprehensible that VW should be allowed to hold drivers down, pour alcohol down their throats, then make them drive.
GrungeKid_27 come on bro, don’t be sayin that
ChrisCarGuy - Hi Chris :) it’s okay. Let him say whatever he wants to. This world, including the internet is such a place. Not all things get straight in the end, not all mankind are kind, but that’s okay. It’s more important that you have a happy and safe day, wherever you are.
GrungeKid_27 yeah, I’m old enough to learn this world is full of hopes but also some scums.
WOW!!!
0:30 - Ford 'Guillotine' Sierra
9:15 - Volkswagon 'Uber- Kompact I' Santana
13:08 - Volkswagon 'Uber Kompact II' T3
13:50 - Comodore 'Quick Mincer'
THESE ARE THE WORST, IN MY OPINION.
Hopefully people were dettered from buying these vehicles if they were lucky enough to see any of this footage before purchase.
Someone said the commodore had 1000 kg of sand in it and that is what made the car crash bad
My dad was in that car and crashed it and he is still alive so I don’t see it being bad
Or maybe just sell the car with a warning
Omg these are so bad I can't beleive
Mike Elbow most of those cars aren’t for sale and if they are there 25 years old and nobody wants a old car
Sashounet 24 that’s actually wrong. There are many Oldtimer enthusiasts all around the globe.
0:32 The all new Ford Sierra, the steering wheel now accessible from the back seat!
U copied this didnt u
No
Hahaha
😂
@Sam Sandwich it doesnt matter nothing is original on yt
0:26 “Sierra” in Spanish actually means “saw”, and the Ford Sierra is really honouring its name: it literally chopped my mate's head off!
Yeah hahahahahh
That's fucked up
Sierra at 90 km/h
It paralysed Frank Williams
To be fair, I read about someone who had nearly been killed by a broken rear hatch strut or one of those!
Fun fact: If the car stays perfectly intact after the crash, that's also bad. To get a good score in these tests, the car's engine bay, and ONLY the engine bay, should crumple upon impact. That way the shock is absorbed by the car and not passed to the passengers.
the polo did the best out of all of these. even tho it still jumped quite a lot, with airbags it would be fine
@weewee7790 thats what irritated me, why was there no airbag deployment?
Drivers cabin looked fine, as u mentioned
i saw ppl mention it was the indian verison or smth. Apparently they remove a bunch of features to save costs etc.. hopefully i dont think you can drive too fast over there. But still. VW have some of the safest cars out there so i was surprised to see a quite recent polo here, even tho it performed the best@@quelandil5738
Indeed, staying intact after a crash would mean all the forces go into the driver and passengers making it more likely for them to die
🤔 i would say that not crashing is the best result
After 6 years of hardwork and finally, I own myself a Comodore
-his last word-
hello, i think u can hardwork so basicly u can afford a 525tds for burn it in the champs u know mon couzin bèz t mor
Its holden commodore
That’s pretty sad…
Enjoy it, but be doubly carefull, friend :-)
are u alive???
The Ford Sierra was by far the worst, the steering column/wheel will literally decapitate you.
I'm quite shocked at how badly the Citroen Saxo did considering this was aimed toward younger drivers who invariably have more accidents, you'd think closer attention would have been made to the safety aspect.
Well yes but beeing targeted towards younger drivers also mean it needed to be a cheaper car. And most of the time it means safety budget cuts.
Yes the Sierra was eye openingly savage! To think I have driven a ton up in one aswell back in the day.Deathtrap.
@@Tezorus well, the next ones must have been better, I bought one brand new in 99 (saxo) it had side impact and airbags. Never crashed it on the 2 years, 38k miles I had it mind. Think this was why they redesign it, the peugeot 106 was the same car.
I remember the time when the chinese "Landwind" made it to the european market in the early 2000s. It failed the important crash tests because the vehicle safety was equal to the safety standards from the 1960s. The dutch importer, who was responsible for the sale on the european market, said that you cannot expect perfect safety for only 15.000 Euro...
I think the Comodore is the worst
13:09 extracting the driver from that wreck would require a sponge.
What if they actually put a dummy in there 😱💀
Folded like a fuckin accordion
Good thing it wasn't a test for the T3. ruclips.net/video/uykStESm3vw/видео.html
The test was ran at 100 kph to test the walls the car had additional weight in the back
@@rambos829It would be a waste, the dummy would’ve been decimated and the company would basically obliterate 2 million dollars
I find it somewhat disturbing to see the crash test with the sierra, as it is awfully close to what can happen in reality with that car. A little over 20 years ago, my girlfriend and I were on a winter holiday in Norway. On the way back to our cabin, we were some of the first on the scene after a traffic accident where a vw transporter and a ford sierra had collided. Almost nothing had happened to the transporter, where the driver had only received a wound on the shin. On the other hand, the female driver of the Sierra had unfortunately experienced the same thing as you see in this video. The steering wheel had completely smashed her jaw, the dashboard had folded around her and her seat had been pushed into the B pillar and bent it. It was therefore not possible to get her out. She was still alive but unconscious. While we waited for the ambulance I tried to make sure she could breathe, but unfortunately she succumbed to her injuries shortly before the ambulance arrived. Hope she could feel that someone was with her until the end.
I was driving back home from visiting family and saw a brand new Ford F-150 in the ditch upside down, hazards still going off. I went up to it and the roof had been completely flattened, looked like the roof was just gone the hood and tailgate were touching the ground, there was no window opening to see inside but the truck was still running so I called 911. While I was waiting for the ambulance they said to find any occupants and make sure they are breathing. I managed to lever the door a bit, and just saw airbag, moved it out of the way and felt someone’s wet shoulder, but all I saw was red, and their shoulder was so close to the ground I realized they had no head and the wet I was feeling was his obliterated skull and all the blood leaking onto the roof… I just sat on the side of the road I was so horrified the ambulance arrived and thought I was part of the accident I was in such a shocked state.
Wow what an awful thing to experience. I guess at the very least, as you said, hopefully you made the woman feel less anxiety knowing someone was there trying to help... :(
did she survive?
@@Raouf_K9792 "she succumbed to her injuries shortly before the ambulance arrived. "
No.
😢
13:47 employer: witch Safety system shall we put in the Comodore for crashes?
Engenieer: selfdestruct
inglish
and fuel spray...
Nah at least it would kill you quick
English must be your 2nd language eh?
It was at 100 mph
Volkswagon Santana is a magic show, "Folks! Today we disappear a car into a solid wall, Harry Potter style!"
80386 hahaha exactly
80386 what about Commodore?
Diamond OFFICIAL or the VW T3
TeknoBreaker yup
TeknoBreaker. VW T3 was crashed at 100 km/h with concrete in the load area.
From what I've heard, the crash test of the old Holden Commodore at 13:45 wasn't actually to test the car, it was to test the newly built facility. They ran it at far greater speeds than typical crash tests, and had removed some structural integrity of the vehicle prior to the test.
That would invalidate the results
@@garydomaz1849 they weren’t gathering results, they were just checking that the facility could withstand crash forces without failing in any way.
That explains the lack of crash test dummies in the car
BTW Holden shut down operations last year i guess
They had a choice, crash the Commo into a solid wall or leave it out in a stiff breeze. Seems the wall was less dramatic. : )
That Pontiac Transport is transporting you straight to the grave. 😂
💀
😂😂
The sad thing about the Transport and other minivans is that these cars were designed for families with kids.
Moral of the story: Don’t drive cars directly into solid walls at speed and expect to live.
Not even much speed, the NCAP is performed at 40mph
@@AbderianForge Yeah, but 40 mph to 0 mph in an instant is still going to ruin someone's day! 40 mph doesn't seem that fast these days, but that is still significant momentum capable of doing a lot of damage.
Taylor Surratt yeah but sometimes you don’t have the control of what your car hits. I’m pretty sure car accidents don’t happen because they wanted to
@@1965vw - Walk into the edge of a door at 2 mph and see what sudden stop is like. 40 mph is 400 times as much kinetic energy as 2 mph. ke = ½mv². It's that little ² that's the killer.
@@chiuchiu9470 Or what idiot hits you.
12:50 crashing to a Aveo and seeing the airbag smile to you :)
Congratulations sir! You're dead
It is a Daewoo, after all.
Hey heard of an emoji dont use the old school smile that's why they added emojis
It's actually frowning because the test sucked
Some sick bastard put that smiley face in a test car, not production. Funny shit!
Old cars: Built sturdy so as not to take damage when crashed, more likely to injure the passengers
Modern cars: Built to crumple when crashed in order to keep the passengers safer
Sierra 91: Built to shove steering column through driver's head
Lol😂
Why are you replying to every coment under deez video @@ihavenoideasforahandle3
Old cars do very poorly in these kinds of tests.
Modern cars also built to crumble to keep insurance companies rich
@@abbieliz396 They're built to crumple so you don't.
Who gets a creepy vibe from this...
the bass i love you song causes this vibe...
Me
Because of the creepy music and the images of simulated death?
If you're not creeped out there's something wrong.
I do at least my car has a 5 star crash rating in 2014 so i think im good
mine doesnt have airbags... x.x
13:45 is invalid. The Holden Commodore they used in this test had some of its structural integrity removed and also was run at much higher speeds than normal testing. The purpose in this instance wasn’t to test the safety of the car, rather ensure the testing equipment could withstand the forces of the crashes as it was a brand new facility and they were ensuring the equipment wouldn’t suffer any catastrophic failures.
The Commodores weren’t actually near this bad in a crash.
These small overlap tests are the reason why you can't buy a cheap comfortable car anymore
The T3 test is invalid too. The cargo area was filled with (iirc) concrete to test the new facilities.
코모도로 알바쉑이노
GM junk is unsafe at any speed
No
Actual footage of my wife parking.
Lol
XD
XD
Just make sure she doesn't see the comment.
Second one is footage of any Chinese/Russian driver ever
13:50 A better name would have been the Holden Accordion.
Lol
All cars do that at that speed, it was not a normal test
Corrugated car
The Holden crumbledoor
@@_Neutralizer why are you here????
I don't know if this is just one of those stories you hear down at the pub, but apparently in the 50s / 60s there was a car that when involved in head-on collision would deflect the glove box open, then the sharp metal would decapitate the passenger, and finally forward inertia would result in the glove box closing it's self again. End result is that in many cases, accident responders would mysteriously find the passenger's head in the glove box. I know it seems far fetched, but back then all cars were death traps, with styling full of spikes and sharp edges.
Lmao
Nah, cars were amazing back then. Beautiful, fast, stylish, creative. None of the pussy safety shit
That’s eerie but I’d like to know more about what vehicle and particular accident that was
@John Sinclair any of the cars in this video would be your final destination if you crashed
My God.
My mother had the Seicento. She loved it. I decided to show her this video and she literally scrapped it.
👏
🤣🤣
@@NeverGonnaGiveYouUp71 you rickrolled me😭
How to traumatise ur parents bec they own that specific vehicle 😇
wasn't that bad. just doesn't have airbags
My mom drove a Pontiac transport for like 14 years.... Scary
My step dad drove it for like 3 yrs.
My parents drove the european version for 6 years ( Opel Sintra) also seen in this clip.
My father had the 1995 Lumina APV
She's really lucky.
My parents drove the vauxhall subtract from 1998-2001
*The Ford Sierra costs an arm and a leg, litterally*
*_and a head_*
@@gregbrent3455 you beat me to it
@@gregbrent3455 and your life
@@gregbrent3455 And the repairs and injury.
@@moisesvillanueva7248 If by injury you mean putting the head back in the body...
The safest place in Santana and Commodore is in the trunk.
WhiteDragon unless you’re rammed from the back lol
The Commodore had previously been in a major accident. The video is to serve as a warning to anyone who might think they can repair two damaged cars by welding the “good” halves together.
LooooooL
And VW T3
German and Australia Car is Dangerous!
13:10 has to be the worst one ever. I can't imagine a vehicle doing worse than that!
Edit: 13:47 aaaaaand I was wrong!
IKR! Jesus Christ! It looks like they used foil or something
Or something like cardboard car
Kolonel Mabuk card bored is better
It's a serial killer car😂😋😂
If they new there was going to be a test wouldn't they just not sell the car in that country?
12:51 some smart arse drew a smilie face on the airbag.
Those are just air holes
And it's the Chevorlet Aveo.
Welcome to heaven :)
@@jackbauer4762 r/wooosh
@@okWojtazliterally lol
The VW T3 clip wasn't a test of the vehicle, it was actually a test of the facilities as the vehicle was loaded up with concrete and crashed at over 60 mph.
Note to self: never load my car with concrete and drive into a wall at over 60 mph.
@Dimochka :3 but why this tes exist so ?
@Black Rod Damn, 4 months ago I crashed into some concrete with my T3. Concrete won.
That’s what I was thinking
I believe it's a similar story for the Comodore, they loaded the trunk with sand bags to celebrate the construction of the new test site
The second one actually tore the dummies head off.
ikr
Might as well decapitate the driver and make sure he doesn't suffer for long.
off with his head
Oof
Ford Guillotine.
the polo would actually be a good rating if the airbag went off
Ye it’s indian version.
Most cars sold in Indian markets don't have airbags. The European spec got a full 5 star safety rating
@@sta255_ why tho, to expensive?
@@johnnytheemeraldcat6727 Idk maybe they can't afford cars with pre-installed airbags so u have to pay extra I rlly dk
@@johnnytheemeraldcat6727 And I guess air bags have been mandatory for new cars for quite some time in more developed countries
9:15 Holy crap, the car almost disintegrated
Same story at 13:06
32 Bit my draw DROPPED at that one. It just kept going and going
@@Beelzebubby91 I am glad it was just a mock test though, the car was going more than 120 kph, crashed into a non-deformable wall and had extra weight in the back.
how about 13:45?
"ight imma just delete myself from reality, you mind if i do that?"
13:11
Wall: *Exists*
Volkswagen T3: dissolves
The Holden Commodore being in the compilation needs clarification. The car was pulled into the barrier at 100 kph (about 60 mph) to test it's "catastrophic crash integrity" after a major repair. Specifically, this was a warning against buying a car created by welding together two donor car halves. At any rate a car hitting a solid barrier at that speed will probably disintegrate.
Quite a few of those tests were done at much higher speeds than normal, that VW pickup was also loaded with extra weight in the back. The videos really for entertainment rather than education.
The things my brain decides to watch at 1 in the morning always confuse the shit outta me.
6 in the morning here hehehe
odd thing is im watching this at 1am
😂
When did 1 become morning ? It's midnight
I laughed so hard on the second crash test -- the Ford Sierra -- when the dummy on the driver's side had his head decapitated. I don't know if I've ever seen that happen before.
Those dummies probably cost more than the car!
it was volkswagen but ok.
the one who made this video is a dumbo.
ruclips.net/video/comS0B4brMA/видео.html
Imagine if that was u!
Rip people that died in that car
The Commodore is actually a crash test testing the facility, it was loaded with heavy sand and was travelling at 100kph. So it is not fair.
It also apparently had a large amount of shock absorbing parts removed- door cards, unnecessary interior trim- the like.
13:55 O.O EVERYONE IS FUKIN DEAD
It's the best car ever 😀😁😅😆
Only Ant-Man survived, sustaining some injuries.
They crashing that car in 100 or200km so it looks like the car is running in 60kmnbecause it is slow motion👍
Best car ever ! Desinged specialy for biiiig families ;)
Thats crazy, the back simply kept going
There was a time where TATA nano scored zero in crash test. Now even cheap cars of TATA has 5 star safety rating at global ncap.
The nano is seemingly indestructible
VW is more safe than
Tata jo har baar पलटी ho jati hai 😂😂
Please don't make us look stupid. Tata doesn't have a single car that will pass the euro ncap.
Global ncap only has the frontal offset crash test.
Tin K Dabbe Wale Jayda Na Fudke To Bahtar . 😂
@@PumapumpumIndian related stuff needs Indian comments
13:50 is terrifying
It’s a test for the wall, not an actual crash test thank god.
the Volkswagen T3 was loaded with 200 kilos of bricks, and launched at speeds over 100kph.in the real crash test it did fairly well.
yep also the santana was going 160 km/h
and the santana was also loaded with sand on the trunk
you're dead either way
fair enough
almost correct but it was 2000 kilos
Ford Pinto: *Laughs in Explosion*
LOL
0:27 steering wheel now accassable from the backseat
A whole new meaning to the term "Backseat Driver"!!
😂😂😂😂
69th like
Jeremy Clarkson needs to know.
8:58 Windshield: *IGHT IMMA HEAD OUT*
Windshield did what it was supposed to do, too bad the dummy forgot his seatbelt.
‘Pontiac transport’ “let me just make this dummy get so hurt”
you may fly out lol
@@ncmemes6009 I think he’s wearing a seatbelt so that’s why the dummy didn’t fly out
9:16 it just disappeared! :O
Matěj Vašíček, what about the Volkswagen truck?
Matěj Vašíček OMG it was like a 100mph crash
@@ArnoLouwagie not in the same speed, the passat just befor is the same chassis and the result is little bit diffrerent.
Should be able to polish that out with my trusty Auto Glym polish and wax. That's if we find the car after that.
It just disintegrated
13:47
Holden: you’re a great guy, GM. thanks for letting me in your group.
GM: *ohoho we should make the Commodore out of modelling clay*
Lmao
Imagine how scary it must be watching your dummy friends firing in one of these and knowing you are next
But the thing here is, even if the dummies were alive, they were made to survive these kinds of impacts. To them it's just good fun!
@@Kermiitti ooh, i'd like to be a dummy then :) but not the Sierra one...
the dummies are reused and guess what? THEY ARE FAR MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE CARS... FAR MORE...
@@mewity just put the head back pn
@@WorkersofAmericaRise wym it got _smacked_
Imagine cruising along in your Santana and all of a sudden you cease to exist.
😬
Forcing your way into the next dimension.
9:37 i think its good for 1993
it is
Julián Del Conde I hate vw but this result is impressive as for 93'
GT_BNRxAdi why do you hate vw?
@@sapnupuas6950 commonity tbh, Im aware of the fact they are well made so their quality is actually solid but.... These cars are just boring of that reason, there's nothing what I'd love about them.
GT_BNRxAdi what cars do you like then?
9:16 it just went from a 4 door to a 2 door
Lol :D, So True
No it went from a front engine to a mid-engine.
Toată how you get a coupe car
These cars a made from aluminum foil
Its made of tissue paper
School toilet paper
The rudy games made of beamng files
@@dutcheastindiancompany8415 beamng soft bodies are so bad, I want them to make cars tougher
@@tacticalidiot175 no it's good
As a rule of thumb: The older the car, the unsafer it is.
Btw, some of these cars like the "Comodore" (whatever that is) and the "Volkswagen T3" I am fairly certain are cheap, license built copies built in China in the 90's or so. They seem to have been made with the cheapest and worst steel they could find since these cars have zero rigidity and crumble like tinfoil.
Commodore - Australia
T3 - Germany (maybe the US too)
Not in the case for an old Volvo bro, that cars are extremely safe
Make sense, since cars are part of depopulation program there
the commodore is a opal ,German car , Holden built and designed there own chassis after 2005 , lol now BMW bought it ,i think in 2018 or 19.
RIP Holden
@@normalguy6640 The T3 might’ve been a similar case.
Crazy how the A-pillar completely fails in a lot of these, which in turn leads to the roof collapsing. Resulting in the driver impacting the A-pillar with their head=basilar skull fracture=instant death.
Which is why crumple zones and a safety cell exist. Crumple zones crumple and absorb the energy. A safety cell is very rigid and has to stay intact.
The Passat Variant (8:53) is the wagon version of the Santana sedan. Structurally both are exactly the same!
13:14 the Volkswagen T3 looks like it has the structure of a classic British garden shed😂
I've shred my cat
@@Autovaz2104 w h a t
@@bird8129 tomorrow I will use the cat as welding machine.....
@@Autovaz2104 oh ok
@@Autovaz2104 w h a t
7:53 thank goodness that Simon from the inbetweeners never had a crash 🙏🙏
“and you won’t be able to get up enough speed in it to kill yourself” - Simon’s dad
0:25 1991 Ford Sierra.... Did the dummy just get decapitated by the steering wheel?????
Yes
eyyyyyyyup
the dummies head and torso were weight in the commodore test.
LMFAO at the smiley face on the airbag at 12:50
+X Burst but i really think the polo wuz quite good in the test
+Puercoespin 500c The polo does have airbags, in every country. Those tests were part of a survey done by the ADAC to demonstrate the importance of airbags.
But the idiot running this channel didn't care.
Kommentator India has airbags optional...
X Burst i saw it😊
:D
With the Volkswagen Santana they were even afraid to put in dummys @ 9:14
Lol😂
*Imagine a demolition derby where the only cars are Ford Sierras*
wrgg
Twingo better than a C-Class. Always liked that little teddybear.
These cars should be in BeamNG Drive.
I agree
definately
Yasss
0:20 Wow! That was pretty abysmal result for 64 km/h crash test.
In all fairness, the 156, Baleno, Xantia, Saxo seemed good in comparison to the rest on here. The T3 test was actually a test of the facilities, not the vehicle. They increased the speed more than usual, as well removing parts of the structure.
9:14 : the volkswagen santana is going in the track 9 3/4 direction hogwarts express
11:27
Bad news!
The Dacia Sandero is featured in this video
Good reference dude 😂
?
@@littlebugslug search james may dacia sandero reference, he s one of the 3 original top gear presenters
Indian version! (No Support frame and no airbags) Left out for cost saving and to fight overpopulation
Jeremy : oh no, anyway last week....
Some of these aren't that bad. Some were tested in exceptional conditions like the Santana.
SaTaNeAtChEeSe IV Username checks out
Hm
And the first Sierra I think
Likewise the Commodore test, wasn't testing the (modified,weighted,100km/h) car at all, but the facility itself.
At least one of these cars was rated 3 stars, far from the 'worst'
How fast were the Santana and Commodore going?? That wasn’t a standard 35mph/60kph test. I’m guessing they were both going considerably faster, like 75/120.
Someone said they were loaded with concrete and thrown as fast as possible to test the (at the time) new facility
1) 100 kmph is the answer
2) they were full of sand
3) that was a test of a facility wall, not car
Makes me realise how lucky I was being driven round in a Sierra all those years as a kid😨
Sierra was crashed at 90 km/h into a tree. Not really comparable with small overlaps at 50 km/h.
@@t3ss3r4ct4 yes but they still had a terrible safety record. Not exactly the best car to hit a tree in.
@@matty6848 Well there weren't many safe cars in early 90s to be honest :DD
Never thought I’d hear Bass I Love You as background music lol. Most people don’t have speakers to hear that this song is an absolute deep bass demon😂
Well I’m on my phone but when I put my ear closer, I can hear the potential lol
Maruti Suzuki : So many inspiration. I have to fail like them, even better.
Looks like, after taking some rudimentry measures and looking up the dimensions of the VW Santana, that the test at 9:17 was taken at a speed of approximately 100 km/h (62 mph), which is much higher than the speed at which standardized full frontal crashtests are being done, namely 56 km/h (35 mph).
Take that into account when judging the safety of these cars. For instance, it looks like the Holden Commodore was tested at a similar (non-standard) high speed.
According to another poster on here the Commo was used to test the equipment out and not the car it's self and was indeed run into the test rig far faster than usual.
No test dummies in either car as well so it looks like it indeed a test or calibration type event.
unfortunately 60mph/100kmh is the speed which most countries highways/motorways are
Also, another poster here stated the cars were filled with weight in the rear of them to test the equipment. These tests were definitely not for the safety of the vehicles but calibration of a new facility.
The speeds were not typical and the extreme weight added to the rear end of the vehicles.
The Clio and Mercedes actually did well at protecting the driver in the crash even though it looked bad.
That’s what I thought, even though the car is never coming back, the driver could be.
As an Australian I will happily say R.I.P to that holden commodore
Lol
Holden: barely holden’ together.
Haha nice one!
Cool
This is good to know. Now I can avoid buying a deathtrap
Here in India, VW Polo and Ford Figo are usually considered safer cars than most others in that segment. 😂
Tata😎😎
*than most other Maruti Suzukis in the segment.
Some Tata, Mahindra cars are doing good bruh. Yeah in 1990s many were shit, but not now, except Maruti Suzukis many national and foreign cars are good.
@@mnd7381 yeah. Tata, Mahindra are doing exceptionally well in terms of safety. Foreign brand's like Toyota and honda are reasonably good as well. My problem is with Suzuki/Hyundai/Kia which together sell 70% of all passenger vehicles in India.
Lundia for a reason
yea , coz in this they didnt had airbags , but when they r crashed with airbags they score 4 stars
Ford Sierra: No company can make a vehicle’s design more deadly than ours.
Holden Commodore: I’m about to do what’s called an epic gamer move.
Volkswagen T3:hold my beer
The primary distinguishing feature of most of these "bad" crashes is that the A-pillar buckles and the safety cell compresses into the occupant's space (old tests on vehicles lacking airbags notwithstanding).
Creepy-ass music
"I love youuuuu" >.>
BASS I love you 😂 this shit was famous among car subwoofer enthusiasts in the 90's and early 2000's.
@@nawaal4452 EXACTLY
They're all deaf.
13:52 Slim mode: On
🤣
Haha good one
Agah Toruk wtf 69 likes on this comment wtf
Ford sierra: kid in back: "I wish the steering wheel can come to me so I can drive." Soon after " wow it came true."
I have heard that particular commodore test they had removed the engine and gearbox, had a boot full of sand and it was at 100kmh + ...
To simulate exactly how those cars are driven in australia!
They drive cars without the engines and gearboxes?
Such a strange bunch, the Australians! I wonder how they go so fast without the engine, telekinesis? xD
Me: looks a Ford Sierra
Me: look through windows and sees Ford Sierra on my laurn
Me: oof
Burn that vehicle so all it’s worth is scrap metal!
You know, what gets me isn't that some of these crashes are truly horrific; that's why these tests are run. See if the designs work. What really gets me is that an engineering team actually thought these designs WOULD work, that they would pass the tests and protect the driver and passengers!
With the cars from the 80s and early 90s (before a standardised crash test was introduced) you sort of expect it to be bad. With the more modern cars from the 2000s it is quite shocking. And also a great illustration that with car safety, you get what you pay for!
It's not about years, it's about mandated safety features like reinforced chassis and airbags(lol). In markets like EU and US, these things were mandatory for quite a while while in markets like South America and India (for which a lot of the cars tested here are made for) they are not (at least at the time of filming) and people there don't care as much or just can't afford the safety features so companies cut them, at least from the base model (on which the testing is done).
The Comodore @ 13:42 self crushing design. Saves a lot of salvage labor.
13:50 "911? I need a can opener and a bottle of maple syrup."
No
The Mercedes did well with dual airbags,only the structure of the body a bit weak
after 1999 they made a new model because of the wors crashtest result
0:29 Head pls, staph xD
KaBe the person in the back seat is now driving the car 0:39
When ur head doesn't like you
@@george-dn8fu Made me laugh out loud at 4am