It’s a sad thing that even with all this affirmation of the Bible’s history, diehard atheists will totally ignore this historical record because of their materialistic and naturalistic presuppositions. Secondly, if you compare this historical record with the Koran or the Book of Mormon, they do not have any of these verifications.
This is all wonderful! But, remember Jesus said, "Even if they were raised from the dead, they still won't believe." This may convince people who are sitting on the fence, but most people will yawn at the evidence and move on.
Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end ^^ speaking about the coming Messiah, which unsealed those words and the gospel went out to the whole world.
The Doctor that questioned the Reality of King David got God's Attention and Now the Stones CRY OUT.......Praise be to God ! and to his only begotten Son Jesus Christ...
Dude seems very smart and well spoken. He doesn't know how many books are in the Bible, but he seems impressive and otherwise knowledgeable. Great interview guest.
The Bible that matters is The Authorized Uersion of 1611. It has 80 books. There are other important books that are not in The Bible, for good reason. Books like Enoch are not for non-beleeuers, they are for those that already beleeue. There is more to The Word of God than what meets the eye. God knows how to diuide the sheep from the goats very well.
@@abaker4692 You and he probably count differently than most people. You might be counting 1 Kings and 2 Kings as one book, and things like that. They technically were one book, but it was unusually difficult to have the whole book on a single scroll, so they split it up. Most people I know count it as two books, though, so that might be why you and I get different numbers.
I think the thing that so many of my Christian brethren don't understand is that evidence, or proof isn't the issue with a vast majority of atheists. I am not saying to stop praying for the lost or to no longer minister to the most intellectual of intellectuals. However do not make an idol of scientific proofs. The reason being is that our trust is on Christ, historical details can be overturned or given alternate explanations that disbelievers will latch onto, with as much religious zeal as most church goers. Having said that, it is not unimportant that the Bible has historical events and artifacts that everyone can see, touch and place in the right time and location.
DAVID the KING is by far one of the most impressive stories in the Bible and Wonderful example of many things about the Almighty. God loves music in fact His whole Creation is like Music. David was a shepherd, a sheep, goat and other animals caretaker but what set him apart was he played a musical instrument and sang songs to God. He was very different from other young men of his time because his heart was pure for the Almighty, and even though he was imperfect as we all are God used his life as an everlasting example. He was (and is) super cool. ❤️✡️✝️❤️
So many parts of the Bible still surprise us today. Sometimes it scared us. Sometimes it give us comfort. But many times, just like this video, awe us in amazement.
Yeah you can't believe by sight -- we don't have reasonable evidence of a god in any form. You know, just like we don't have reasonable evidence of leprechauns elves, etc, and if someone tells you to believe those other ideas "by faith" (by just trusting it's true despite insufficient evidence), then they're trying to mislead you. You understand that for those other ideas (elves, etc) Why don't you understand it for God?
My guess is that most atheists don't so much disbelieve in God as they want their own freedom from God's laws and/or they're angry with God for either allowing them to experience certain things, or that he hasn't made himself utterly and completely apparent to them personally, like speaking to them clearly. Actually, I think he does to those interact with those who are paying attention. But most people haven't learned how to recognize how God speaks and interacts with us. And even then, there is still faith involved. So I understand it can be tough.
I have no problem with archaeological finds from biblical times. I accept them all: the finds that confirm certain historical stories in the bible and the finds that confirm that contradict claims or prove parts that are being downplayed or dismissed by Christians. The fact is there is not a single piece of archaeological evidence for any supernatural claim. And because your claimed god ordered and condoned immoral things like slavery, stoning gays and girls who couldn't prove their virginity based on the hymen/blood myth and r4ping captured and bought virgins he wouldn't be worthy of my worship if he was real.
You should get a hold of the people who made "the Chosen" and make some kind of video that the public would love to see. The Chosen was a great way for a normal human to get a clue about the bible.
another aspect that makes the Bible unique from other creeds is the miraculous claims involving an entire population, as well miracles claimed involving royalty, that should've been debunked were they not real. If the Bible were fiction we might expect truther type movements against, or even competing "fantasies"
Which god? The god who ordered and condoned slavery, stoning gays and girls who couldn't prove their virginity based on the hymen/blood myth and r4ping captured and bought virgins?
How does a young shepard boy who was in the process of tending his sheep, just happen to be any where near the area in which the proposed question of who would go up against Goliath and if defeated would be declared the winner of a war consisting of ten's of thousand's of highly trained and experienced soldier's on both side's?
The army didn't work like it does today. Think a little bit more tribal. They didn't provision the soldiers well (not until David became king and fully implemented iron weapons). David was bringing his older brothers lunch during the mid-day and was embarrassed to see the Philistine taunting his God and his people. I was under the impression the flock was put up in the pen during this lunch hour. They weren't always grazing of course.
Read 1st Samuel in the Bible. David was sent by his father to bring bread & cheese to his brothers who were fighting this war. Samuel the prophet, was told by God that David would be King of the children of Israel and that's also in his writing. Read it, and you find out what, where, why and when...
The “ Intellectuals “ question the validity of David and Jesus because they want to appear smarter than others. It’s safe for them to say outrageous opinions because Jesus and David are Jewish/Christian believers won’t kill them. If they question Abraham the Muslims get very upset.
I find it hard to fault anything that has been uttered out of this powerful gentleman's word's about the history and the authenticity of King David. Glory be to God almighty through Yeshua.
I am here for King David. However, I've seen ancient ruins they discovered in the sea that are described related to Krishnas stomping grounds. I'm not making a religious statement here. Although even in these other religions that have other gods they have a one mysterious God somewhere.
Talking about identity, not only is this Jewish identity but the human identity. We are all offsprings of one of Noah's sons. God is allowing scientists to discover truth. I was in grade school and came home crying because the teacher in science class said that we evolved from the ape. I was just 10, but the thought was horrifying. I told my Dad; he smiled and said, "God created each animal according to their kind in his plan. He breathed into woman and man's nostrils and we breathed his name. That made us different." I asked him if I could give the answer on a test. He told we that I should if I believed that, but I had to accept a bad grade. I did give that answer, and the teacher said that Darwin's research was incomplete. I still have the test. And today even some Darwinists see man and ape as distinct creations. More and more is coming to light. There is no descrepancy between the Bible and science. Sciencce exists because God created our world, created a developing history, present moment and future. In God's time all of history, the present and the future are the present moment. How else can He interact with us.
I think it's a disgrace the manner in which 2 learned people ie the presenter & the guest talked about Hinduism. It takes our Gurus a lifetime to understand, practise & teach Hinduism. Yet the anchor who boldly claims he knows very little about Hinduism then goes on to quote wrong facts. The guest then runs down Hinduism with stupid facts like we worship 33,000 gods. This IDEA was floated by Christian missionaries who failed to understand the difference between respect for nature & EVERY LIVING CREATURE & worship one God, IE follow SANATAN DHARMA. IN FACT THE WESTERNERS WHO FAILED TO UNDERSTAND SANSKRIT GAVE WRONG TRANSLATION ABOUT SANATAN DHARMA IE HINDUISM FACTS. PLS REFRAIN FROM DISCUSSING HIMDUISM & LET US TOO REJOICE YOUR DISCOVERY .
And yet most Bibles have removed the author's name, Jehovah, from the Bible, even though it appears almost 7000 times. Sad everybody accepts King David, but ignore Jehovah.
@@joejohnson8656 A guy that died over a hundred years ago? What about him? I had to Google him to find out. Why do you want to talk about a guy that died? Also, why do you call them a cult?
This expert states letter 'A' = 'Aleph' ... yet many "experts'" mistakenly claim that there are no vowels in Hebrew - yet vowels were a later Greek invention based on the Hebrew alphabet - 'A' = 'Aleph', 'E' = 'Hey', 'I' = 'Yod', 'O' = 'Ayin', 'U' = 'Vuv' ... this would make the Lord's name: Yahwe Elohim = YEUE ALEYM = Creator-Eternal Almighties... Jesus = YEUSO = Creator-Saviour
Technically, an aleph is the glottal stop, not the typical vowel sound that goes with it. I'm far from an expert, though, and I don't know anything about the other ones, but I always thought that it wasn't that there are no vowels but that the vowels don't have their own characters that get written separately from the consonants.
The gospel was written at least 100 years after Christ death and all the so call scrollers always try and analyse all the so call facts. They will never know the reality of the truth it’s all just speculations.
it was written by people who witnessed the event. We have documents less that 100 years from the time of Christ. Dont forget to like and subscribe for more!
And since I believe God cannot lie, God's account can't be fake. So many people question the Bible because they forget or don't know, that God can't lie.
1) You greatly oversimplify the 'absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence' rule. After all, we're not looking for a needle in a haystack here. We're looking for what should be a very large number of them. When archaeologists sift through everything in and around the old city of David [as we call it], the only reasonable expectation is that MANY artifacts testifying to David would be found if he actually existed, and yet none ever have been. This is akin to saying that just because life has never been found on the moon doesn't mean there was no life on the moon. At some point, yes, the absence of evidence is, itself, evidentiary. When what 'should' be there simply isn't there (no matter how hard and how long you look), yes, at some point you're defying reasonableness itself to hold to this concept of 'yet'. If not, you're saying that one of the rules reasonableness supports trumps the very reasonableness that gave rise TO the rule, akin by analogy to giving the Sabbath primacy over the Lord OF the Sabbath. To perhaps put it more simply, friend, when and where data is expected, it's absence is itself a form of data. When the physicians test your blood for markers of a disease and find no such markers, they don't tell you 'as scientists' that you might HAVE the disease but they just 'can't tell." No, instead, they tell you that you DON'T have the disease. When expected data is absent, that's data. If you don't understand that, you're not qualified to be having these kinds of discussions. 2) You fail to mention that dwd in the 'house of David' inscription isn't plainly legible as dwd. 3) You say that the fortifications correspond with the time of Saul and David. That's an erroneous statement. The only thing you can legitimately say is that they correspond with the time period associated with Saul and David. We won't be able to frame the statement the way you framed it until we obtain fully reliable material evidence that Saul and David existed, AND that they existed during that time period. Neither of those two criterion has been met. 4) It is a logical error to assume that all the stories of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles bear the same degree of authenticity, which is precisely what you're doing when you say that a name historically confirmed from one story (e.g. Menahem) proves that ALL the names from ALL the stories are necessarily those of actual historical figures. Some stories could be true. Some stories could be false. 5) Even as a Christian, believing as I do that God existed before all else and that all things are the product of his creative genius, still I do not allow that belief to trump my awareness of the fact that men, in their effort to be of service to Him, were perfectly capable of making any number of false claims. In sum, if you're going to entertain discourse as to the what archaeology does or does not support when it comes to specific biblical personalities (e.g. David), this is simply not a platform where waxing poetic about God's divinity is even appropriate. 6) You proposed that since the two gates of Khirbet Caiaphas are a match for the biblical term shaarayim, it is possible this is the site which corresponds with the David and Goliath story. But when your interviewer took this as 'verification', you strongly agreed. That's not, as you say, scientific. Possibly means possibly. Pick a lane. 7) Yes, see? The absence of pig bones from the site shows that it wasn't a Philistine stronghold. Imagine someone turning around and saying, no, by the 'absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence' metric you cannot say definitively that it wasn't a Philistine site. That would be ridiculous. If it were a Philistine site, you would expect to find corresponding 'data' in the way of pig bones. Since they're to be expected, and yet are absent, by strong inference we 'verify' that it wasn't a Philistine fortification. This same principle apples to the absence of 'Davidic markers' in and around Jerusalem. If he was authentically a king, not a fictional king, we expect to find evidence to that effect. In the absence of such evidence, strong inference follows. In this way, you're picking and choosing when to apply this standard and when not to. That's not science. 8) No, Dr. Hasel, the absence of pig bones at the site does not necessarily in any way affirm kosher practices dating back to this period. You just finished saying that pigs were not indigenous to this region. The stronger argument is that Jews of the period didn't eat pork because there was no pork to eat, not that they didn't eat pork because they eschewed it even though it was available. 9) The evidence found which confirms that Judahites (Judeans) of the 9th and even 10th centuries BCE were literate, even to the point of having a name as obscure as "Ishbaal son of Batur" inscribed into a piece of pottery, goes here straight to the point. Were David real for this period, we'd have found him mentioned this same way any number of times, not only for this period but, given his stated importance, for decades and even centuries thereafter. It's the literacy and the known practice of inscribing pottery which informs us that, no, king David is more likely a later and perhaps even post-exilic invention. Yet again, when you're interviewer treats these kinds of things as 'confirmational', you don't take the clear opportunity to help him not get over his skis. What else to think other than that this is all framed to fish for donors? Levantine archaeology is important. Confirming what we can of the biblical narrative is important. So is disaffirming what warrants disaffirmation. We do not need to believe all of it is true in order to believe what it aims most centrally to affirm. It is unfortunate that intellects at large are not able to embrace the fact of that. And it is unfortunate that scholars coddle to the contrary. Faith is more substantial when it's held onto despite what's evidently spurious.
The true meaning of Christianity returns, not JC personally. It starts with this. The proper understanding that biblical creation is of spiritual nature, not material nature has been discovered. Biblical creation is metaphors for psychological factors not material and is the creation of Adam. THE SECOND COMING OF CHRISTIANITY. (sequence) I will send you Elijah before the great day of the lord.(the nutball has arrived. 1 The entrance of Elijah the messenger. Embodied in the knowledge of the Old Seers. 2 Christianity as present in the world is proven false. 3 The world falls into disbelief. 4 The world mostly takes on the new knowledge. 5 Governments are removed or become inert. 2 camps are created one good-the greater number falls away. 6 The good leave the cities, go into hiding for safety. 7 End time arrives. The evil with no governance destroy their own kind. (by the hand of man will man's blood be shed)(the great day of the lord). 8 Proper Christianity remains. 16
The identity of the original Hebrews is not the same as the identity of modern Jews who are descended from Eastern European converts to the religion of Judaism. No disrespect but just a fact.
You're a parrot. Jews have existed in the land throughout the diaspora. The term "jew " comes from the word "judea". There are Ashkenazi and Sephardic. Israel is home not only to once-persecuted European Jews, but to Jews from all over the globe, including India, Turkey, and South Africa, and many who fled persecution in the Arab world, including Iran, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union, among others. In fact, more than 60 percent of Israel’s Jewish population comes from other Middle Eastern and African countries, with the same origins as Palestinians. Israel is home to close to 160,000 Jews of Ethiopian descent.
This is false. Converts? Israel has always had a population of Jews since the diaspora. Converts? Lol Israel is home not only to once-persecuted European Jews, but to Jews from all over the globe, including India, Turkey, and South Africa, and many who fled persecution in the Arab world, including Iran, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union, among others. In fact, more than 60 percent of Israel’s Jewish population comes from other Middle Eastern and African countries, with the same origins as Palestinians. Israel is home to close to 160,000 Jews of Ethiopian descent. There are Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. Dna lady.
Only 45% are Ashkenazi. 48% are Sephardic or Mizrahi. You're referring to the khazar myth that's been debunked by peer reviewed science and dna. Peer-reviewed journals such as Science conclude that evidence firmly establishes that Ashkenazi Jews “stem from a common Middle Eastern origin and heritage.” The 20 co-authors of the study in Human Biology confirm that Ashkenazi Jews “derive [shared Jewish genetic markers] primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe.” Research
@@Betsy.Ross76 Whether that is true or not is actually a moot point because the word of God tells us in Colossians 3:11 (the last letter Paul wrote and in which he says that he completed the scriptures, Col 1:24-25 KJV), Paul was inspired to declare that there are NO MORE JEWS. After the Jewish nation rejected their Messiah and was divorced by God in Acts 28:28-31, all prophecy that had not at that time been fulfilled was canceled. Salvation went from being a corporate matter where the whole nation of Judah would have received their Messianic kingdom to an offer of eternal life made on an individual basis to anyone on earth that wishes to accept the gift God offers in Ephesians 2:8 & 9. In his last epistles, the ones written after the close of Acts, Paul never again reiterates the prophecy and promises that had been given to the chosen people in time past. Instead, all individuals that belong to God by faith will find themselves translated into the kingdom of God's dear Son (Colossians 1:13) when Christ appears back on earth (Colossians 3:4). Nationality and DNA are not and will not be the basis for salvation at all.
No disrespect but you need to stop thinking you know it all because you saw some s*** on RUclips. Or because you've been listening to Black WANNABE Hebrew Israelites. The stuff you just spewed has been proven 100% false by science and DNA.
Humans made these ancient ruins connected to god because everything that happenned in those days were attributed to they,re beliefs in god. One could easily attribute these events to Aliens.
So the same people that claim there is evidence of Jc, says there’s no evidence of David? 😂 where there is countless evidence of David and zero evidence for Jc.
What are you talking about...did you say no evidence for Jc (Jesus Christ)? Now you know better than saying that. I would be glad to show how mistaken you and many atheists are.
@@abaker4692 all the Gospels are anonymous. Names slapped on them. Nobody knows who wrote it. But the church will affirm that these people are who they say they are. Yet we know all the disciples of Jesus were poor fishermen, no education, nobody knew Greek. Only Aramaic. The Gospels are written in Greek with people who are highly educated. So only the faithful believe the Gospels are authentic. Bart Ehrman and many bible scholars have just become Athiests. Knowing fully well they are a fraud.
Right, don't go over a thousand, otherwise it won't be believable. Back in the beginning no one lived past a 1000 years, cuz you know, that would cause suspicion. 😂😂😂 🩷🧡💛💚💙🩵💜❤️
I never had any doubt that the Bible was A Book of History!
It’s a sad thing that even with all this affirmation of the Bible’s history, diehard atheists will totally ignore this historical record because of their materialistic and naturalistic presuppositions.
Secondly, if you compare this historical record with the Koran or the Book of Mormon, they do not have any of these verifications.
Exactly!!
I agree. The Bible just beats them all.
The book of mormon is a fairy tale by Joseph Smith.
@@petrahinkley5489: agreed
@@anilkanda611
And then there's Ellen G White who is responsible for the founding of Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, and Jehovah's Witnesses.
This is all wonderful! But, remember Jesus said, "Even if they were raised from the dead, they still won't believe."
This may convince people who are sitting on the fence, but most people will yawn at the evidence and move on.
The Holy Scriptures is the breath of God. The Bible is inspired by God Almighty, Amen Hallelujah 🙏
It seems that every year or more evidence is revealed that verifies another biblical story. The end is near.
Dan. 12:4
Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end
^^ speaking about the coming Messiah, which unsealed those words and the gospel went out to the whole world.
The Doctor that questioned the Reality of King David got God's Attention and Now the Stones CRY OUT.......Praise be to God ! and to his only begotten Son Jesus Christ...
Thank you guys for this video!
Bible archeology is absolutely fascinating to me!
then you are a fool
Glad you enjoyed it!
*dont forget to like and subscribe. Thanks friend-it means much.
Dude seems very smart and well spoken. He doesn't know how many books are in the Bible, but he seems impressive and otherwise knowledgeable. Great interview guest.
That's becos the exact amount of books has been altered, as result h does not want to commit himself. The original amount of books goes over 80 books
@@MartinChetty-i1i got a source?
The Bible that matters is The Authorized Uersion of 1611. It has 80 books. There are other important books that are not in The Bible, for good reason. Books like Enoch are not for non-beleeuers, they are for those that already beleeue. There is more to The Word of God than what meets the eye. God knows how to diuide the sheep from the goats very well.
He said 66. That’s how many are in there. 😊
@@abaker4692 You and he probably count differently than most people. You might be counting 1 Kings and 2 Kings as one book, and things like that. They technically were one book, but it was unusually difficult to have the whole book on a single scroll, so they split it up. Most people I know count it as two books, though, so that might be why you and I get different numbers.
I think the thing that so many of my Christian brethren don't understand is that evidence, or proof isn't the issue with a vast majority of atheists. I am not saying to stop praying for the lost or to no longer minister to the most intellectual of intellectuals. However do not make an idol of scientific proofs. The reason being is that our trust is on Christ, historical details can be overturned or given alternate explanations that disbelievers will latch onto, with as much religious zeal as most church goers. Having said that, it is not unimportant that the Bible has historical events and artifacts that everyone can see, touch and place in the right time and location.
DAVID the KING is by far one of the most impressive stories in the Bible and Wonderful example of many things about the Almighty. God loves music in fact His whole Creation is like Music. David was a shepherd, a sheep, goat and other animals caretaker but what set him apart was he played a musical instrument and sang songs to God.
He was very different from other young men of his time because his heart was pure for the Almighty, and even though he was imperfect as we all are God used his life as an everlasting example.
He was (and is) super cool.
❤️✡️✝️❤️
Thanks!
Welcome!
So many parts of the Bible still surprise us today. Sometimes it scared us. Sometimes it give us comfort. But many times, just like this video, awe us in amazement.
Thank you for sharing 🎉
You are so welcome
I love God with all my heart and this gentleman reminds me of Chevy Chase
Excellent content.
Much appreciated!
God's truth endureth forever. Believe by Faith not by sight.
Jesus Christ is Lord amen
Yeah you can't believe by sight -- we don't have reasonable evidence of a god in any form. You know, just like we don't have reasonable evidence of leprechauns elves, etc, and if someone tells you to believe those other ideas "by faith" (by just trusting it's true despite insufficient evidence), then they're trying to mislead you.
You understand that for those other ideas (elves, etc)
Why don't you understand it for God?
Because if would accept your argument then we too would be classified as being a fool as stated in Psalm 14:1. Very simple to understand.
Hi, we recorded our songs at the "House of David" in Nashville. Owned by David Briggs, magic happens there.
I'm sure this makes many atheists sad. Except, I'm not really sure how many of them are truly convinced in their atheism.
I was thinking the same 😊 they should all concede defeat in any future challenges or debates 😊
My guess is that most atheists don't so much disbelieve in God as they want their own freedom from God's laws and/or they're angry with God for either allowing them to experience certain things, or that he hasn't made himself utterly and completely apparent to them personally, like speaking to them clearly.
Actually, I think he does to those interact with those who are paying attention. But most people haven't learned how to recognize how God speaks and interacts with us. And even then, there is still faith involved. So I understand it can be tough.
I have no problem with archaeological finds from biblical times.
I accept them all: the finds that confirm certain historical stories in the bible and the finds that confirm that contradict claims or prove parts that are being downplayed or dismissed by Christians.
The fact is there is not a single piece of archaeological evidence for any supernatural claim.
And because your claimed god ordered and condoned immoral things like slavery, stoning gays and girls who couldn't prove their virginity based on the hymen/blood myth and r4ping captured and bought virgins he wouldn't be worthy of my worship if he was real.
Jesus is coming so soon…give your soul to Him…time is short
You should get a hold of the people who made "the Chosen" and make some kind of video that the public would love to see. The Chosen was a great way for a normal human to get a clue about the bible.
another aspect that makes the Bible unique from other creeds is the miraculous claims involving an entire population, as well miracles claimed involving royalty, that should've been debunked were they not real. If the Bible were fiction we might expect truther type movements against, or even competing "fantasies"
He was taking food to his brother's for his father is how he was there
This was a wonder evidence of the history of Gods proof of HIS word and plan. This is the god I worship!
Which god? The god who ordered and condoned slavery, stoning gays and girls who couldn't prove their virginity based on the hymen/blood myth and r4ping captured and bought virgins?
Faith and believing in GOD creator and Jesus his son is a relationship not a religious practice..Abide in Jesus and he will abide in you
How does a young shepard boy who was in the process of tending his sheep, just happen to be any where near the area in which the proposed question of who would go up against Goliath and if defeated would be declared the winner of a war consisting of ten's of thousand's of highly trained and experienced soldier's on both side's?
The army didn't work like it does today. Think a little bit more tribal. They didn't provision the soldiers well (not until David became king and fully implemented iron weapons). David was bringing his older brothers lunch during the mid-day and was embarrassed to see the Philistine taunting his God and his people. I was under the impression the flock was put up in the pen during this lunch hour. They weren't always grazing of course.
Read 1st Samuel in the Bible. David was sent by his father to bring bread & cheese to his brothers who were fighting this war. Samuel the prophet, was told by God that David would be King of the children of Israel and that's also in his writing. Read it, and you find out what, where, why and when...
The “ Intellectuals “ question the validity of David and Jesus because they want to appear smarter than others. It’s safe for them to say outrageous opinions because Jesus and David are Jewish/Christian believers won’t kill them. If they question Abraham the Muslims get very upset.
I find it hard to fault anything that has been uttered out of this powerful gentleman's word's about the history and the authenticity of King David.
Glory be to God almighty through Yeshua.
What of Ezekiel 38 and 39
national geographic confirmed. now that's funny. they don't have the credibility they used to.
I am here for King David.
However, I've seen ancient ruins they discovered in the sea that are described related to Krishnas stomping grounds. I'm not making a religious statement here. Although even in these other religions that have other gods they have a one mysterious God somewhere.
Shock only the unbelieving atheist world
Talking about identity, not only is this Jewish identity but the human identity. We are all offsprings of one of Noah's sons. God is allowing scientists to discover truth. I was in grade school and came home crying because the teacher in science class said that we evolved from the ape. I was just 10, but the thought was horrifying. I told my Dad; he smiled and said, "God created each animal according to their kind in his plan. He breathed into woman and man's nostrils and we breathed his name. That made us different." I asked him if I could give the answer on a test. He told we that I should if I believed that, but I had to accept a bad grade. I did give that answer, and the teacher said that Darwin's research was incomplete. I still have the test. And today even some Darwinists see man and ape as distinct creations. More and more is coming to light. There is no descrepancy between the Bible and science. Sciencce exists because God created our world, created a developing history, present moment and future. In God's time all of history, the present and the future are the present moment. How else can He interact with us.
Wonder who could that be 😂
I think it's a disgrace the manner in which 2 learned people ie the presenter & the guest talked about Hinduism. It takes our Gurus a lifetime to understand, practise & teach Hinduism. Yet the anchor who boldly claims he knows very little about
Hinduism then goes on to quote wrong facts. The guest then runs down Hinduism with stupid facts like we worship 33,000 gods. This IDEA was floated by Christian missionaries who failed to understand the difference between respect for nature & EVERY LIVING CREATURE & worship one God, IE follow SANATAN DHARMA. IN FACT THE WESTERNERS WHO FAILED TO UNDERSTAND SANSKRIT GAVE WRONG
TRANSLATION ABOUT SANATAN DHARMA IE HINDUISM FACTS. PLS REFRAIN FROM DISCUSSING HIMDUISM & LET US TOO REJOICE YOUR DISCOVERY .
And yet most Bibles have removed the author's name, Jehovah, from the Bible, even though it appears almost 7000 times. Sad everybody accepts King David, but ignore Jehovah.
What? Who does?
Oh, you are in the jehovas witness cult. Good to know
Yes let’s talk Charles Taze Russel for a bit. See how that goes
@@joejohnson8656 You should have been in the Olympics, jumping to a conclusion like that. I'm sure you know what a slippery slope it is to assume.
@@joejohnson8656 A guy that died over a hundred years ago? What about him? I had to Google him to find out. Why do you want to talk about a guy that died? Also, why do you call them a cult?
Archaeology is showing teh Bible to as much of a historyical text as it is a religious text!!1
This expert states letter 'A' = 'Aleph' ... yet many "experts'" mistakenly claim that there are no vowels in Hebrew - yet vowels were a later Greek invention based on the Hebrew alphabet - 'A' = 'Aleph', 'E' = 'Hey', 'I' = 'Yod', 'O' = 'Ayin', 'U' = 'Vuv' ... this would make the Lord's name: Yahwe Elohim = YEUE ALEYM = Creator-Eternal Almighties... Jesus = YEUSO = Creator-Saviour
Technically, an aleph is the glottal stop, not the typical vowel sound that goes with it. I'm far from an expert, though, and I don't know anything about the other ones, but I always thought that it wasn't that there are no vowels but that the vowels don't have their own characters that get written separately from the consonants.
E is not “hey”, H is. And “Yod” is Y.
Yod (Y) Hay (H) Vav (V/W) Hay (H).
We still have the "b'ar Daw'ida" ( house of Dawid) in Kenya, the real land of Caanan.
Stop.
@@dazdavis7896 why should I? It's the truth. Judah is still a name used among them. It's actually "whuda" and it means a "man of war."
@@1devoch 😆😆😆😆😆 Sit back down and just stop trying. You’re utterly clueless.
The gospel was written at least 100 years after Christ death and all the so call scrollers always try and analyse all the so call facts. They will never know the reality of the truth it’s all just speculations.
it was written by people who witnessed the event. We have documents less that 100 years from the time of Christ.
Dont forget to like and subscribe for more!
And since I believe God cannot lie, God's account can't be fake. So many people question the Bible because they forget or don't know, that God can't lie.
1) You greatly oversimplify the 'absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence' rule. After all, we're not looking for a needle in a haystack here. We're looking for what should be a very large number of them. When archaeologists sift through everything in and around the old city of David [as we call it], the only reasonable expectation is that MANY artifacts testifying to David would be found if he actually existed, and yet none ever have been. This is akin to saying that just because life has never been found on the moon doesn't mean there was no life on the moon. At some point, yes, the absence of evidence is, itself, evidentiary. When what 'should' be there simply isn't there (no matter how hard and how long you look), yes, at some point you're defying reasonableness itself to hold to this concept of 'yet'. If not, you're saying that one of the rules reasonableness supports trumps the very reasonableness that gave rise TO the rule, akin by analogy to giving the Sabbath primacy over the Lord OF the Sabbath. To perhaps put it more simply, friend, when and where data is expected, it's absence is itself a form of data. When the physicians test your blood for markers of a disease and find no such markers, they don't tell you 'as scientists' that you might HAVE the disease but they just 'can't tell." No, instead, they tell you that you DON'T have the disease. When expected data is absent, that's data. If you don't understand that, you're not qualified to be having these kinds of discussions.
2) You fail to mention that dwd in the 'house of David' inscription isn't plainly legible as dwd.
3) You say that the fortifications correspond with the time of Saul and David. That's an erroneous statement. The only thing you can legitimately say is that they correspond with the time period associated with Saul and David. We won't be able to frame the statement the way you framed it until we obtain fully reliable material evidence that Saul and David existed, AND that they existed during that time period. Neither of those two criterion has been met.
4) It is a logical error to assume that all the stories of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles bear the same degree of authenticity, which is precisely what you're doing when you say that a name historically confirmed from one story (e.g. Menahem) proves that ALL the names from ALL the stories are necessarily those of actual historical figures. Some stories could be true. Some stories could be false.
5) Even as a Christian, believing as I do that God existed before all else and that all things are the product of his creative genius, still I do not allow that belief to trump my awareness of the fact that men, in their effort to be of service to Him, were perfectly capable of making any number of false claims. In sum, if you're going to entertain discourse as to the what archaeology does or does not support when it comes to specific biblical personalities (e.g. David), this is simply not a platform where waxing poetic about God's divinity is even appropriate.
6) You proposed that since the two gates of Khirbet Caiaphas are a match for the biblical term shaarayim, it is possible this is the site which corresponds with the David and Goliath story. But when your interviewer took this as 'verification', you strongly agreed. That's not, as you say, scientific. Possibly means possibly. Pick a lane.
7) Yes, see? The absence of pig bones from the site shows that it wasn't a Philistine stronghold. Imagine someone turning around and saying, no, by the 'absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence' metric you cannot say definitively that it wasn't a Philistine site. That would be ridiculous. If it were a Philistine site, you would expect to find corresponding 'data' in the way of pig bones. Since they're to be expected, and yet are absent, by strong inference we 'verify' that it wasn't a Philistine fortification. This same principle apples to the absence of 'Davidic markers' in and around Jerusalem. If he was authentically a king, not a fictional king, we expect to find evidence to that effect. In the absence of such evidence, strong inference follows. In this way, you're picking and choosing when to apply this standard and when not to. That's not science.
8) No, Dr. Hasel, the absence of pig bones at the site does not necessarily in any way affirm kosher practices dating back to this period. You just finished saying that pigs were not indigenous to this region. The stronger argument is that Jews of the period didn't eat pork because there was no pork to eat, not that they didn't eat pork because they eschewed it even though it was available.
9) The evidence found which confirms that Judahites (Judeans) of the 9th and even 10th centuries BCE were literate, even to the point of having a name as obscure as "Ishbaal son of Batur" inscribed into a piece of pottery, goes here straight to the point. Were David real for this period, we'd have found him mentioned this same way any number of times, not only for this period but, given his stated importance, for decades and even centuries thereafter. It's the literacy and the known practice of inscribing pottery which informs us that, no, king David is more likely a later and perhaps even post-exilic invention. Yet again, when you're interviewer treats these kinds of things as 'confirmational', you don't take the clear opportunity to help him not get over his skis. What else to think other than that this is all framed to fish for donors? Levantine archaeology is important. Confirming what we can of the biblical narrative is important. So is disaffirming what warrants disaffirmation. We do not need to believe all of it is true in order to believe what it aims most centrally to affirm. It is unfortunate that intellects at large are not able to embrace the fact of that. And it is unfortunate that scholars coddle to the contrary. Faith is more substantial when it's held onto despite what's evidently spurious.
The true meaning of Christianity returns, not JC personally. It starts with this. The proper understanding that biblical creation is of spiritual nature, not material nature has been discovered. Biblical creation is metaphors for psychological factors not material and is the creation of Adam.
THE SECOND COMING OF CHRISTIANITY. (sequence)
I will send you Elijah before the great day of the lord.(the nutball has arrived.
1 The entrance of Elijah the messenger. Embodied in the knowledge of the Old Seers.
2 Christianity as present in the world is proven false.
3 The world falls into disbelief.
4 The world mostly takes on the new knowledge.
5 Governments are removed or become inert. 2 camps are created one good-the greater number falls away.
6 The good leave the cities, go into hiding for safety.
7 End time arrives. The evil with no governance destroy their own kind. (by the hand of man will man's blood be shed)(the great day of the lord).
8 Proper Christianity remains. 16
The identity of the original Hebrews is not the same as the identity of modern Jews who are descended from Eastern European converts to the religion of Judaism. No disrespect but just a fact.
You're a parrot.
Jews have existed in the land throughout the diaspora. The term "jew " comes from the word "judea".
There are Ashkenazi and Sephardic.
Israel
is home not only to once-persecuted European Jews, but to Jews from all over the globe, including India, Turkey, and South Africa, and many who fled persecution in the Arab world, including Iran, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union, among others. In fact, more than 60 percent of Israel’s Jewish population comes from other Middle Eastern and African countries, with the same origins as Palestinians. Israel is home to close to 160,000 Jews of Ethiopian descent.
This is false.
Converts? Israel has always had a population of Jews since the diaspora.
Converts? Lol
Israel is home not only to once-persecuted European Jews, but to Jews from all over the globe, including India, Turkey, and South Africa, and many who fled persecution in the Arab world, including Iran, Ethiopia, and the former Soviet Union, among others. In fact, more than 60 percent of Israel’s Jewish population comes from other Middle Eastern and African countries, with the same origins as Palestinians. Israel is home to close to 160,000 Jews of Ethiopian descent.
There are Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. Dna lady.
Only 45% are Ashkenazi. 48% are Sephardic or Mizrahi. You're referring to the khazar myth that's been debunked by peer reviewed science and dna.
Peer-reviewed journals such as Science conclude that evidence firmly establishes that Ashkenazi Jews “stem from a common Middle Eastern origin and heritage.” The 20 co-authors of the study in Human Biology confirm that Ashkenazi Jews “derive [shared Jewish genetic markers] primarily from populations of the Middle East and Europe.”
Research
@@Betsy.Ross76 Whether that is true or not is actually a moot point because the word of God tells us in Colossians 3:11 (the last letter Paul wrote and in which he says that he completed the scriptures, Col 1:24-25 KJV), Paul was inspired to declare that there are NO MORE JEWS. After the Jewish nation rejected their Messiah and was divorced by God in Acts 28:28-31, all prophecy that had not at that time been fulfilled was canceled. Salvation went from being a corporate matter where the whole nation of Judah would have received their Messianic kingdom to an offer of eternal life made on an individual basis to anyone on earth that wishes to accept the gift God offers in Ephesians 2:8 & 9. In his last epistles, the ones written after the close of Acts, Paul never again reiterates the prophecy and promises that had been given to the chosen people in time past. Instead, all individuals that belong to God by faith will find themselves translated into the kingdom of God's dear Son (Colossians 1:13) when Christ appears back on earth (Colossians 3:4). Nationality and DNA are not and will not be the basis for salvation at all.
No disrespect but you need to stop thinking you know it all because you saw some s*** on RUclips. Or because you've been listening to Black WANNABE Hebrew Israelites.
The stuff you just spewed has been proven 100% false by science and DNA.
The guy with a Pony tail, forgot to read the, versus, about how MEN ARE TO CUT THERE HAIR AND THE BEARDS!❤
You do realize that was solely for Israelites under the Mosaic law right. Which we are not.
How funny this was predicted that archaeology woukd discover things to debunk the bibie. Load of rubbish
Humans made these ancient ruins connected to god because everything that happenned in those days were attributed to they,re beliefs in god. One could easily attribute these events to Aliens.
lol Ok.
Clickbait title AGAIN! How can a title say something will change my mind when you have no way of knowing what I think? I’ll be blocking this station.
Changing your mind is an expression for persuasiveness. Ultimately it’s your choice. No one forces a change.
…. While YOU know how you think…!!
You still click on it…. and watch it…
Apparently you get offended very easily….
So the same people that claim there is evidence of Jc, says there’s no evidence of David? 😂 where there is countless evidence of David and zero evidence for Jc.
What are you talking about...did you say no evidence for Jc (Jesus Christ)? Now you know better than saying that. I would be glad to show how mistaken you and many atheists are.
There is reliable and ample evidence for both if you really care to research it.
@@sethflores1680 you assume I haven’t? So xtianly of you….
There is zero evidence for Jc….
The Arabs of the holy land are the True King David’s and Chosen Ones
When you say biblical authenticity you mean Tanakh authenticity. OT. Authenticity. Not NT. NT is as authentic as yetti. 💯☑️☑️
Got any evidence to back that up?
@@461weavile Bible scholar Dr Joshua Bowen provides the details. See his testimony. 💯✅✅✅
@@461weavilehe'll never be able to answer your question. Their conscience seem to bother them which is why they're here.
NT isn’t authentic? That’s an odd statement.
@@abaker4692 all the Gospels are anonymous. Names slapped on them. Nobody knows who wrote it. But the church will affirm that these people are who they say they are. Yet we know all the disciples of Jesus were poor fishermen, no education, nobody knew Greek. Only Aramaic. The Gospels are written in Greek with people who are highly educated. So only the faithful believe the Gospels are authentic. Bart Ehrman and many bible scholars have just become Athiests. Knowing fully well they are a fraud.
The guy thought that the Koran was written by god too!! OH MY!!
Right, don't go over a thousand, otherwise it won't be believable. Back in the beginning no one lived past a 1000 years, cuz you know, that would cause suspicion. 😂😂😂
🩷🧡💛💚💙🩵💜❤️