i9 9900K vs i9 10900X vs i9 10980XE Test in 8 Games
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
- Intel Core i9 9900K 4.9GHz vs i9 10900X 4.9GHz vs i9 10980XE 4.9GHz (RTX 2080 Ti)
Visit Gamivo and get games in good prices, go to: bit.ly/2QMiqWr
Use coupon code: TestingGames to get 3% discount for orders below 65€.
Games :
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Outer Worlds - 01:40
PUBG - 02:33
Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 04:00
HITMAN 2 - 05:30
Kingdom Come Deliverance - 07:14
The Witcher 3 - 08:40
Metro Exodus - 09:47
System:
Windows 10 Pro
Intel i9 9900k OC 4.9GHz
Asus ROG Strix Z390-F Gaming
Intel i9 10900X OC 4.9GHz
Intel i9 10980XE OC 4.9GHz
Asus Prime X299-A II
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB
16Gb RAM 3600Mhz
Games :
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Outer Worlds - 01:40
PUBG - 02:33
Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 04:00
HITMAN 2 - 05:30
Kingdom Come Deliverance - 07:14
The Witcher 3 - 08:40
Metro Exodus - 09:47
When will i9 10900k will launch
Now do the same with Ryzen lineup, fps difference between lower costing and more expensive CPUs.
@Freestyle You even English?
AMD YES
God honest truth. You wasted so many peoples time with this video. Overclocking 3x different Cpus at the same speeds. Pointless, as you could have seen by the results yourself. Not impressed
You can build a whole set up at i9 10980xe's price
Same with all of these cpus?
And get the same gaming performance
1000$ don't buy must exp overpriced
@@karvq5192 9900k is pretty cheap for its performance
@@gc_1060 lie
The only difference I can see is price.
Look at the cpu useage 😑
Having powerful CPU, RAM or SSD speeds greater than the game requirements doesn't improve performance.
But with each CPU release the game creators increase requirements.
in games, yes
Cpu usage is the diference
X-series support quad memory channels. Those is better than K-series.
"See the difference?"
"No"
"Me too, but it exist"
UPD:Dudes, its just a fcking joke lol
@@nope00010 i know. I 9 10980 XE is VERY good in montage. I meant difference in FPS
Neither do i*
La veo. Es el precio $$ vs $$$ vs $$$$
Look it the big difference is the price.
Отвал
$1000 for i9?!
I’d rather buy the Apple monitor stand.
Nah, just kidding
Had us in the first half ngl -_-
Bro in Brazil its R$5000,00 almost R$6000,00
Woo hah f**k Apple , don't like them i got HP OMEN X Emperium 65 inch 4k 144hz monitor for 3500$ and i don't need girlfriend because love to play FIFA 20 at 65 inch it's better than s**))))or pubg call of duty and and other stuff like that)))))My monthly salary is 3000$ my pc cost 10K))))))
Man fuck apple
you need buy a brain - 10980xe - HEDT platform, price must be over 1k$
Intel be like:
*i9 10980XE-KS1080*
*i9 10980XE-KS1080TI SUPER*
@@Mini-Mose 10 gen,
X - high end unlocked,
E - ecc memory,
K - unlocked (already in X),
S - special edition,
T - low power draw,
I - nothing, so, we can swap it with Y - lower power draw,
S - special edition
U - ultra low power
P - highly efficient (TDP = 20-29W),
E - energy efficient dual core CPU (TDP >= 55),
R - based on BGA1364 and high performance graphics.
There you go! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Source: www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html
@@metty3873 good job
@@Mini-Mose thank you! (◍•ᴗ•◍)❤
@@metty3873 WHAT ABOUT THE LETTER H
So cpu usage on the 10980xe says I can stream, record, render and play at the same time
Basically, yes.
Ryzen does it better
ya but still I'd go streamer pc dedicated. That's always better anyway.
Well your GPU would say no to rendering something else at the same time. And 9900k would suffice for streaming and recording
@@miggies8140 3990x
Though the FPS is lower. 20% is actually pretty damn impressive. But seems to be much more for a server
The main advantage of X processors is support for quad-channel memory. The test is utter rubbish
I have to give props to this channel for including Witcher 3 in almost every review. It's good to see the game still compete in terms of graphics with current AAA titles and still being a 2015 game.
Thats not a good thing the graphics aren't really advanced enough to be the reason why it takes a strong build to fully power it
The reason is that the games optimization was terribly tuned
everybody loves The Witcher
That's not good, that's horrible. It means graphics hasn't improved as much as it should have in these 4 years.
I think he just added it back in because of the Netflix series
Best game ever.
Look CPU usage
What about it
Who the fuck cares about cpu usage? I didn't pay 1000 dollars for my cpu to run at 50 percent in hopes of getting some sort of satisfaction. Run at 100 percent, cooling you is my job
20% less with 900x and 50% with 980xe
@@4a4arA sometimes cpu usage means that it's not optimized properly if it's low, and just because cpu usage being higher doesn't mean it's much worse
Jasper its allways like that not just sometimes
notice how the i9 10980xe is running at like 20% or lower the whole time
in 2021 the best amount of cores for gaming ONLY is 6 to 8 cores, the i9900K and i10980XE are running the same amount probably, BUT then there's a lot of power unused in the i10980XE that can do other tasks in the background
@@Utroll i posted that comment almost 2 years ago, you don’t need to respond lol. i’m aware
@@nathanvinogradov8259 I know yes, that was just to complete your correct statement.
Could be because of a lot of games not being very numa (or however it's spelled) aware and can't make use of all the cores and their power, yes I'm late
just felt like posting again on this for an extra notification
The 10980XE would be an amazing single pc cpu if you wanted to stream. Getting the same FPS as the 9900k but getting like 10% usage most of the time leaves so much head room to stream.
Lol and after you stream, it is only at 20% usage 🤣🤣🤣
Exactly, all these people "all I see is price", well shit are you blind? 😐😐
“Here is how a gaming-focused CPU stacks up against two high-end CPUs designed for something completely different. In gaming.”
Commando Jessica More like Geforce vs. Quadro IMO.
Titan is basically Geforce with Quadro upgrades, e.g. Full GPU die, more RAM.
Or is it Quadro with Geforce firmware and HDMI...?
@Commando Jessica Imagine gatekeeping comments based on how interesting they are, I bet you're not even intimately familiar with Nvidia's product stack Kappa
A whooping $1000 only for a cpu holy crap
You won't game on a $1000 CPU. It might be useful for rendering or cad
Its worth the same as my entire pc
AMD has chips that expensive too. They’re not for gaming but more data center applications. As you can see here, the $400 gaming chip is basically the same if you’re just trying to run games.
I think if you game and target 120FPS in shooting and 60FPS in most tiles for 1080p, A GTX 1660 Ti with i5 9400f with Dual channel RAM is best thing you can get
For 4k 60FPS and 120 for shooting, A GTX 1080ti or RTX 2080 with i7 9700K is enough with quad channel RAM
Shooting games are like CS:GO, Fortnite, Player Unknown's, Battlefield V all are at high settings or very high
@@prateekpanwar646 wait are you dumb? Quad channel ram is only available on threadripper no wonder you're only stating Intel processors
The performance it’s the same but look the use %
What do you expect,more cores less use.But this means nothing because games won't use more than 8 cores anyway,not even in 3 years.
•• in my case i like simming/P3D or xplane while doing this i can play Other games etc etc
BossMongolJesse unles the game got multi-core rendering
@BossMongolJesse You clearly don't know how this things work right?
I said that games don't use more than 8 cores,but this is not true in most of cases,in reality,games don't use more than 6c 6t.
Now tell me,you can't stream with 8 cores 16 threads? Isn't that enough?
Rendering while gaming,well I haven't done this yet,but it will probably make the render much slower,also I don't think I can do that properly with a Ryzen 7 2700x.If you are going to buy a i9 10980XE you'll probably have more than one PC anyway.Also you should be pretty stupid,becaus there is already Ryzen 9 3950x at the same price,but with a much better single core and also it beats in multicore performance despite I9 having 2 more cores.So not only the core matter,IPC is a very important factor too.That's why you should never get an 16 core cpu for gaming,in 3-4 years it will be like a xeon procesor in games.
•• why wont they use more than 8. Like any game would only just use 8 cores?
if there were a i7 9700k overclocked to 4.9ghz, it would show the exactly the same result
No. Cpu usage no
@@droneguy001 at least until subzero alchohol coolers are the norm in like 15 years
my i5 too '0'
@@kaxike7988 what
Pretty cool seeing the 10980xe perform like this.
Yeah that CPU will actually get more utilized as time goes by, not less. It will get less like a good idea, but still
I got one for half off, feeling pretty good
"It's evolving just backwards"
letni
@@user-wr5we2xg6h and dma ?
@@4secs419 AMD is doing great
@@user-wr5we2xg6h Sure !
@@4secs419 yeah about that...
**laughs in intel atom**
*laugh in intel pentium 1 gen*
Why not testing in watch dogs 2? It's best game for cpu test...
Poor optimisation
Intel:
I9 9900k 490$ - no no no
I9 10980xe 1000$ - yes yes yes
Is this... A JOJO REFERENCE?!?!
@@raawesome3851 No, absolutamente no.
@@pablotn2976 jeez. It was just a joke.
Just 10 fps difference don't waste 510$
GAME MONSTER it’s not meant for gaming 😂😂😂 what an idiot
X person: JAJAJA the 9900k wins
Me: look at the cpu usage, dork
How did it win ? It had the highest cpu usuage
@@CNTEKINNOVATIONS r/woosh
@@jasmansingh2235 lol
That CPU basically idles its way through these games on ultra settings. Absolutely amazing.
Check Ryzen 9 out... Has more cores then this lol
@@kajmak64bit76 but games don't properly utilise all the cores in a CPU so single core performance is more important.
@@IQuickscopeCA wait really?
@@imranmazlan1920 ofcourse, if overall CPU power mattered instead of single core, people would use threadrippers for gaming.
@@IQuickscopeCA ye no shit... I was saying more cores= more CPU is idle..
Also why didn't this guy test all these cpu's against Ryzen cpu at same clock
Plus i am sure that next few years we will see rapid growth in CPU power.. More cores... We are basically got fucked all these years by intel and their quad cores.. It's time developers optimize for more cores :D
Intel Worker 1: So guys it’s been like a few months since the i9-9900K came out but it seems the benchmark was very familiar in comparison to the i7-9700k, that’s really scary.
Intel Worker 2: Should we release the new CPU that every game developer is gonna optimise straight away?
Intel Worker 1: Yeah, and we’re gonna put ‘Extreme’ so it sounds better.
Intel Worker 2: just because of the name, let’s make it super expensive to excite all the PC enthusiasts and gamers!!
(The extreme clearly isn’t good enough for our latest gaming)
Benchmarkers: Basically, intel is ripping you off.
PC Enthusiasts: Bye Intel, hello Ryzen!
Terrible joke but true, too tired to make a good joke aha.
stupid people like this ^ spreading bs at its finest
@@KillThemAll7wolf intel worker 2 detected
@@KillThemAll7wolf what are you trying to spell there kiddo?
@@miguellagos8889 Oh yea.. I forget, amd fan= stupid. Sorry my bad, ofc you can't understand normal logic. Sorry
I think the XE series chips would win if you used a quad channel memory configuration on them.
Isn’t xe supposed to be best can u dm me lol!!! I need some help if ur down!
@@jetlifemonroe7720 Sorry yes that's what I meant.
@@jetlifemonroe7720 The only thing holding back the 10980XE and other x299 chips is the lack of PCIe 4.0 support. Personally I would wait for the next Intel HEDT release. I really wanted the 10980XE but since I game as well as do music production/video editing/image editing/game design etc... the lack of PCIe 4.0 support really limits the future proofing aspect of it despite it being an amazing CPU in terms of latency and general grunt.
AJD OLD CHANNEL ARCHIVE yea it was clear you meant it should be better I was honestly just confirming lol! I don’t know to be honest but I can imagine that’s how the letters work! And the 10920 is better than the 10900 right ?
@@jetlifemonroe7720 At the moment the absolute best deal for this type of HEDT Intel setup is getting a Huananzhi T8 motherboard that supports DRR3 ECC memory, and an Intel Xeon 2678 V3 12 core/24 thread CPU and using the turbo unlock hack to boost all cores to 3.3ghz, then get as much DDR3 ECC RAM for cheap. All can be gotten for cheap on Aliexpress, you can also get a RX 580 8GB for about £100 on there, so about £500 total for a 12 core/24 thread beast with 32-64GB RAM and a decent GPU which beats out anything on the AMD front for price to performance big time.
2:10 they try to shot one cpu down
I9 10980XE.. HOT TEMP!!
because i9 10980XE has more cores and threads so it hot
@@igm1571 unlike the ryzen 3950x lower than that and its 16 cores lmaooooo
because it have 18 core compared to 9900k there is 8 cores only so double the cores
you calling 60° hot?
60° hot? Are u idiot?
i just wonder where thee i9 10980XE will stand vs the i9 9900K in 4 years in a game that's out in 2024, turned to max settings. That's what I really wanna see.
Was memory (in this test) in quad channel on i9 10900X and 10980XE?
Holy cow that cpu usage, guess even RTX 2080 ti isn't good enough to release full potential (100% cpu usage) of that cpu, we need RTX 3080 ti !
nah, intel need to acknowledge that PCI 4.0 exist, intel is the real bottleneck in terms of PCI
Thing is, they might run around the same but the 9990K is running at around 65%+ while the 10980XE is running at ~20%. Which means they are running at the same, but the 10980XE is not trying whatsoever while the 9900K is having over half it’s potential put in
We all know this comparison is useless, but knowing what the channel does is actually justifiable. Good job guys and thanks for all your videos.
For gaming, either get the 9900k or wait for the 10900k, the 'X' CPUs aren't as good for gaming. But if you do Gaming and other stuff then the 'X' CPUs are probably what you want
Me when I see no difference between them 0:20
If bill gates were to buy all 3 of these it would be equivalent to that of an average person buying a pack of gum
even less actually
Why core i9 9900k still costs $900 in my country?🤬🤬🤬
Last year went to US on a business. Had nothing to do at the evening, so i went to local Best buy and guess what i saw? Your shiny 99OOK on sale like 100$ off deal before actual price cut. Why not? Love smuggling hardware from US. Every time feels good not paying 33% for local customs control, fck 'em. Doing it every time i can. Mechanical keyboards, mouses, 1+ KWt PSUs. Once even got my ROG PG 279Q monitor in a carry on into the plane. 775 in US but 1300 in my place. Sweet.
The 9900k is the only on that is meant to use for gaming so everybody complaining in the comments complaining about the higher prices for the x series should either inform himself or just shut up
It's not that, all of Intels high end CPUs are designed for gaming, it's just that games can't utilise upwards of 8 cores thus far, but in the future, these X series processors will turn out to be a great investment due to the higher core count, the X series CPUs will also perform much better in multitasking situations like having chrome, discord, and whatever game you decide to play open at the same time.
Simple answer to why the FPS count is the same but the CPU percentage is much lower:
i9-9900k only has 8 cores, which most "advanced" games can take advantage off. That's why it's at rougly 60-90% all of the time.
i9-10900X has 10 cores, but modern games can only handle take advantage of about 8 cores. That's why the CPU usage is less.
i9-10980XE I'm not sure about this one, but i'm guessing 12 cores. And as I said before, modern games can only handle about 8 cores of performance but since it has 12 cores it can take a small percentage of 1 core to the other etc
10980xe has 18 cores
+510€ -2fps
Good work Intel!
the usge is 9% to get 165 fps (: it's sick
The thing is games can't actually utilise these many cores. That's why you see 8% cpu usage in right most and 33% on left. New processors are faster, But software can't utilise that fully for to GPU and memory speed bottleneck. So, you need to do something in software not in hardware like update is engines upto 128 cores of usage. But, that's really difficult and inefficient. It's like 128 people are doing same thing, They wouldn't co operate and slow down each other. Better option is to improve 1 core performance
Thank you for that video. It was very interesting to observe the 9900K keeping up with two newer CPU's with all the new instruction sets. I'd love to build a Ten core system 🙂
12 cores is a sweets spots! for all games 👍
i9 10900x and 980XE are much more future proof, look at the CPU usage, they are being used much less to achieve the same framerate.
This just proves that clock speed is all that matters after 4 or 6 cores
No, it doesn't. IPC and individual thread performance matters much more. Also look at the usage of the CPU. Neither the 10900x or 10980xe are good for gaming, but the usage is much lower.
60° @ 20% cpu usage
Imagine the processor runs @ 100%
It will burst
@@jurgenklopp6885 you can grill steaks on it 🤣🤣
I thought rdr2 was ultra settings
Ya hak why would you do that
FBW Cuz at 1080p with a 2080 Ti, why not?
Because he is testing CPU and not GPU.
He runs the games in 1080 with lower settings on some games to make sure the GPU isn’t maxed out.
This way, the CPU can process the game the fastest he can.
If you run the game in 4K or with higher settings, the GPU will need much more time to render a frame, and the CPU will have to “wait” longer and won’t be able to process the game as fast as it could.
For example you are testing 5 different GPU with the same CPU :
In 4K, the GPUs will all show different framerates.
In 1080 and low settings, they will all show the same framerate because the CPU in this case is almost doing all the job.
@@louisrmusic rdr2 is still unoptimized CPU and gpu.
@@louisrmusic in the end i saw someone know what he is talking about . cos most of the visitors don't know nothing about engineering . yet they are posting there ridiculous opinion.yes sir you are right . and its not fair to put these x,xe series cpu's with k serie in gaming they can do well in game but they are not designed for this purpose. let him put them on multi task proccess . like rendering vray or baking a lightmap for a game then we will see what the diff. they will toast the k series . and the winner will be the xe series cos it has 18 cores and about 25mb of memory cache.
Go battle: i5-9600k vs i9-9900k pls :)
Some games I still play are all about single core performance, and for everything else 8 cores will be enough for a few years at least. When all games are able to use many many threads then the core wars will really get going.
then the 10980xe is made for future proof until core series can oc to 6+ghz pretty easily
I really appreciate your hard-work because this type of videos take so much time to make. :))
Intels are running cool, as usual. I can't wait for 10nm.
7nm exist in this world and you still waiting for 10nm 😂
@@septianarisandi1001 No wants that sorry excuse for 7nm performance gains AMD is offering. Still being outperformed core-for-core by old 14nm Intel. I'll buy 10nm Intel because it will be superior to AMD like always. Xe graphics will make Navi look mediocre, as well, but it will be between Nvidia and Intel when it comes to any of my builds. That's for experience of building over 70+ custom PCs for others and myself.
ENKI intel wont go to 10nm they will keep their 14nm until end of 2021 which they will just go straight to 7nm and skip 10nm
@@designz3d zen 3 and rdna 2 just destroyed your fanboyism. Dont be so biased lol
higher price
less/same performance
*ah yes , the negotiator*
Lagoz 18 cores 36 threads...
Lesson of the day:
High-end CPU's that are not meant for gaming will preform pretty much the same regardless of price.
10980xe with 4.9g is unbelievable.maybe fpu will cost 600 watts, i guess.
maybe just on 1 core , not all cores
Intel still stuck on 14nm ancient tech and it's showing.
where is it showing? I cant see it.
Not to mention, that AMD's """""""7nm"""""""" is basically just marketing bullshit, since it has a much lower density than intels process
Arre caballo
The confrontation between i9 9900k and i9 10980xe, one costs $ 490, and the other $ 1000. At the same time, the difference is only one FPS
Look at the CPU usage dude, FPS isn’t everything
To those saying the performance is same:
Intel has clearly stated they they didn't produce or engineered in single core performance the real comparison will be in video renderring
Why is the 10980 at the same temperatures as the latter even though it’s usage is only a 3rd of the rest, something fishy here
Blackie Chan because its not about the usage, its using the “same power” than 9900k but it has a lot more room, so its less %. That’s why for example a 7400 (4c/4t) at 100% usage is most times at 40-50 degrees while a 9900k is at that temp at 25% usage, because in the end it’s using the same power, it only changes that 9900k has more power to give so it shows 25% instead 100%
not only that, have you seen the pubg benchmark? it's the same video for all 3 cpus. those results are fake
xhogan89x nah its not the same video, he tries to do the same so you see the FPS difference, idk how to explain. But it’s not fake
forget about FPS, look at the CPU load
Its not relevant by playing games maybe at streaming but 1000 bucks for a cpu? :D
@@richardnagy4809 my comments related to this video, the theme of which relates to games
You are right in this but if you only play games i9 9900k is enough
@@GameAnalyZer0 i5 is enough*
@@GameAnalyZer0 Ryzen 3 has better value anyway
9900k and 10900X: *using half of their power*
10980xe: *not even using a quarter of its power*
How he can simultaneously run these games ?
It's not simultaneously, It's three screen capture on different computer (or at least CPU) and the movements are probably scripted (in pubg)..
lol AC on 9900K : You can run 1.25 instance of Odyssey
On 10980XE : You can run 4 instances of Odyssey. Just that.
Best on benchmarks no reason to consider the 10th Gen Processor. Not enough bump if any to justify.
are 10900x and 10980xe in quad channel mode? I think they are dual channel and making same result with 9900k
At this point I think we can safely say that the 9700k is literally all the cpu you need for gaming these days.
Yes... Anything more then that is waste of money for gaming at least...
AMD win
No
Yes
Performance: No difference
Price: Absolutly a difference
Performance in _games_ that don't even fully utilize all threads. People keep posting the same thing without understanding that.
Geeze I'm shock on what i9 9900K can do. I thought 10900x and 10980XE would smoke them.
i still will go for the 10900x cuz its like 100dolars more in my country and im going sli
ryzen 5 5600 : what kind of peasantry is this
Intel : Zombie Lake edition 🤢🤢🤢
"Wait, its all the same performance?"
"Always has been"
cpu usage
the XE isnt even is barely struggling lol
My PC Specs:
CPU: i9-9980XE based CPU w/ 18 cores at 4.50GHz
GPU: 130 TFLOPs
GPU architecture: NVIDIA TITAN RTX (Turing GPU)
Memory interface: 24GB GDDR6 / 384-bit
Memory bandwidth: 672GB/s
Internal storage: Samsung 970 EVO NVMe SSD 1TB
IO throughput: N/a
Expandable storage: NVMe SSD slot
External storage: USB HDD 1TB
Optical drive: 4K UHD Blu-ray drive
Xbox Series X Specs:
CPU: AMD Zen 2- based CPU w/ 8 cores at 3.8GHz
GPU: 12 TFLOPs
GPU architecture: AMD RDNA 2
Memory interface: 16GB GDDR6 / 320-bit
Memory bandwidth: 10GB at 560GB/s, 6GB at 336GB/s
Internal storage: 1TB custom NVMe SSD
IO throughput: 2.4GB/s (Raw), 4.8GB/s (Compressed
Expandable storage: 1TB Expansion Card
External storage: USB 3.2 HDD support
Optical drive: 4K UHD Blu-ray drive
PlayStation 5 Specs:
CPU: AMD Zen 2-based CPU w/ 8 cores at 3.5GHz (Variable Frequency)
GPU: 10.28 TFLOPs, 36 CUs at 2.23GHz (Variable Frequency)
GPU architecture: Custom RDNA 2
Memory interface: 16GB GDDR6 / 256-bit
Memory bandwidth 448GB/s
Internal storage: Custom 825GB SSD
IO throughput: 5.5GB/s (raw), typical 8-9GB/s (compressed)
Expandable storage: NVMe SSD slot
External storage: USB HDD support (PS4 games only)
Optical drive: 4K UHD Blu-ray drive
oh i have to pay 400 more dollar for -2 fps 😂
i9 10980XE is not the 9900k sucesor, is a different CPU family, made for differents tasks, but in addittion is as fast as the 9900k in gaming, so you know your comment doesn´t have any sense right?
look at 0.1% low
those cpu is not for gaming
@@M_SVD not JUST* for gaming, as you can see here, the performance in gaming is really good
@@_Tesla_Corp._ yup.. these cpu cant supprases the 9900k. For now
Cuz most game dont even require that much cores to run
But who knows what would happen on the next few years
The worst joke from Intel in 2019
those 2 cpu is not for gaming
its for multitasking and editing and ...
on that place the differences becomes more obvious
@@M_SVD ryzen threadripper 3990x lol
@@lalu9285 lol
@@M_SVD Even for what you said, they are not that great vs the competition. Even the 3950X, wiches not even an HEDT processor but a R9, so it's a mainstream plateforme, is still sticking to the ass of all three 80XE. ( 7th, 9th, 10th )
You would test on any of the CPUs you have: 8 Cores / 16 Threads vs 10 Cores ? 👌✌
RIZECEK 10cores/20 threads.
It was at this moment, Intel knew they fucked up
At 4,9GHz all of those CPUs are going to perform similarly in games. Just for gaming it is useless to get the X299 platform.
Btw what cooling did you use and what voltages were the CPUs running at?
How do you even get the i9 10980xr to 4.8 Ghz?
great improvements intel !
watch cpu usage !
I would chose the i9 9900K, however, I would go with a Ryzen 5 or 7. Having more than 8 cores isn't necessary for gaming, since games don't use more than 4-6 cores. However, more editing, and multitasking, and other cpu intensive tasks, go for the i9 10900X and 10980 XE. (What's with the weird naming)
Man put the game at lower resolution and low graphics to see difference
AMD: All that for a drop of blood?
Aakash Sahani well at least it won’t roast itself up
What cooler you use?
Might be xbox one x equivalent settings idk but then again it's probably not
@@PotatoNuggetBoi Higher than Xbox One X you console pleb
@@v_iron I figured as much when I second guessed myself
@@v_iron hold up a fucking second i'm dumb asf nigga you called me a console pleb? Dafuq is
that, and for your information i primarily play on pc but will occasionally play on xbox here and there
@@PotatoNuggetBoi hahahahahah, 30 fps with xox😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The 9900k in this situation is like that one fat kid in school that can hardly beat a 100 metre sprint without stopping for 10 seconds.
I9 9900k 490$????? In my country its 595 $!!!
no improvement as expected
I hope you're trolling.
Lol i9 1090XE power consumption
what power cosumption? Is not shown in the video, you mean CPU usage?
@@_Tesla_Corp._ at that clock consume over 600watt
3% cpu usage on the 10980xe. Would be amazing for streaming.
Cryptic ryzen can do it better
throw in the e5 2689 for $50 for a laugh
nice
And now an i5 13th gen 13600k crushes all 3 of these CPU.
Technology has come full circle.
Some idiotic bots still thinking amd/intel made all their processor just for gaming
All 80XEs looks futureproof as fuck
cpu usage is different. you can use those extra cpu that is left for multitasking without any problem. since they are all locked at 4.9ghz and the games uses same amount of cores. you will get the same result. but if u do multitasking. it will make a difference
9900k cpu usage - 72%, 10900x - 40% usage , 10980xe - 20% usage . 10980xe - for growth.
Always consider CPU usage. The 10980XE will get you 5fps slower than a 9900KS sure, but you will also be able to do video editing, maybe some 3D rendering, and streaming all at the same time. Also, as stuff gets more intensive over time the 10980XE will pull ahead of the 9900KS due to its raw power
Thanks for your video!
I love to watch videos about somethink, more expensive than all my life ❤️
the best conclusion: 10980xe is pretty decent for
futureproof
i9 10980xe have 18 cores 36 threads.....
Soon intel would cross half century in cores and threads with huge prices
So the Ryzen 9 3950 x is faster and cheaper.... thanks a lot.