You really brought it! I've been inhaling these comparison videos, and this is the first time I understood the mapping of the product line. For an indoor video interview shooter, ZV E10 makes a lot of sense, and given it's much lower price point, buying 3 at one time is somewhat possible, resulting in a nicely matched 3 camera shoot. Allocate the savings on bodies, to lenses. On other hand, A6700 is hard to beat for its advanced feature sets, which you spelled out so clearly.
i'm using the ZV-E10. The things that may push me to the switch is the Autofocus, viewfinder, colorscience and the "different settings for photo and video". Oh. and the dynamic range. Great video!
I have the ZVe10 and have had no complaints. But I am considering the a6700. So, your video has been very helpful. Still haven't decided, but your video is pushing me in that direction.
Thanks for a possible head's up. I'm not in a hurry to switch from my Zve10. The only thing I would love to see added is a viewfinder...so perhaps an updated model will include that? I'm a subscriber and enjoy your videos. Keep them coming.@@seandewispelaere
I used ZVE10 for a year it is good! Just bought the a6700 and really amazed by its quality and performance! Especially the battery life of a6700! Anyway I love these two cameras! From now on the a6700 will be my main camera to shoot video and the ZEV10 for photos and some videos. I only shoot in 1080p so there will not be any overheating issues.
Does the a6700 handle noise at high ISO for photography better than yhe zve10? I do wildlife photography with the zve10 but thinking of upgrading if its worth it
I pre-ordered the A6700 but ended up cancelling and just going straight to the ZV-E1, I am so happy I made this leap, it's just a night and day improvement: unreal low light, few extra stops of dynamic range, substantially reduced noise levels across the board, there are so many incredible cheap full frame lenses, it also ended up being more compact than APS-C.
I mean if it's just for Vlog, E1 is a perfect one. But 90% professional production nowadays won't accept it because of the single card slot. Instead, I would go with A7iv within the same price. My line up currently: Hybrid crop: E10 Cinema: fx30 Hybrid FF: A7iv
@@kptktp_09029 A better alternative is the A7S III, the A7 IV doesn't have 4K 60 without crop or 4K120 and isn't as good in low light. Also neither have the incredibly good AI chip from the A7R V which is prevent on the ZV-E1 so the E1 is still vastly superior in many ways, including portability. I don't think you are using the E10 or A6700 in professional production either...
@@DigiDriftZone I know Obviously if you really have budget, A7s3 is the best lineup in my opinion.(Unless u focus only on video and don't do 50 50, I would go with Fx3 instead) But with under 3000 and u want both professional aka travelling, A74 is the best one. I do understand about the crop factor but literally, the Linear Bining on FullHD 120fps already gave you enough quality to do the slow motion(And Honestly, I do 50 50 photo video on a7iv, so that's why i have Fx30 to compensate for that 4k60 10% crop, but if I only need 1 camera, I will bring my a74 with fullHD 120fps) Yes, 1 card = no production work. That's what E10, E1, A6700 is having. My first camera was actually E10 and I did a lot of production works on it, but after 1 year and half, I decided to upgrade to Fx30 cuz it gives me the unsafe feeling aka the 10 bit 4 2 2 with dual ISO is wayyyyyy much more flexible for me in post. Sample from ZV E10: m.ruclips.net/video/BhQn2juyrCI/видео.html
Current E10 user here, out of camera video color at 4K is great for what i do, However, Stabalization is awful on the e10, customization is only ok, its very limited if you want to try and push your skills further. Also, the low light usage isn't very good, actually its terrible. It has its good qualities for a €700 camera, but it will only get you so far if you're looking to push yourself further as a videographer/content creator. thanks so much for this video man, really beneficial, i was wondering what cam to upgrade to for a while!
At low light, I recomend to get down with exposure use best ISO possible and make photos from RAW. In raw is obviosly less noise than from its JPEG compression, and its more easy to generate your own better output..... but in Video mode, you cannot control nothing, and right, its capable to make bright video in the dark, but at cost of high exposure with extreme low ISO and noise..... :-( ZVE10 really performs bad, really bad...... Its a shame when Osmo Action Cam do a much better job than this, but for sure, withouth lens option, even my Note20Ultra makes better videos :-(
A6700 is a fabulous camera for the price, I have the ZV E10, will stick with that for a while but will upgrade to 6700 eventually (even thought its a little overkill for me, I dont colour grade) . Since your video we now have ZV E10 2 to consider, but given its price i'll skip it in favour of 6700 which has recently dropped $200. Thanks for great review.
ordered my zv-e10 just yesterday, because of the deal breaker you mentioned. As my name suggest,I'm a DJ and i bought it for our monthly stream which i'm going to record the set with. Can't be worrying about camera's shutting down while im playing and doing a stream. So yeah the a6700 might have newer bells and whistles, and the zv-e10 mk2 might lean heavy towards that but it might potentially have the same issue as the 6700 due to the rumoured same battery as the 6700 and body which could give some troubles with heat and recording limits. Edit: Can't freakin wait till mine comes!
Hello, What do the "a", "c", "r" models in Sony cameras tell us? For example, can we say "a" models are photos, "c" models are videos, "s" models are hybrid? Which device would you recommend for both video and photography?
So close to upgrading from my ZV E10 to the A6700 and then saw the FX 30 at 1595 usd at B&H. Now I'm undecided 😂 It doesn't overheat, but it's only 1fps in photo mode, which might be OK.
Great comparison! I have a e10 and planning to upgrade to 6700 for all those superb features, especially in low light conditions, which is a bummer when I take pictures. But... I guess the price should be a litter lower, maybe around 1k euros for a used gear, cause with 1500 I'd better go for a used a7iv around 2k euros! Yes, that's 500€ more but it's another level of competition, if you know what I mean Am I wrong?
Tough call. The a7iv does lack a lot of those newer features. It’s outstanding but I’d consider looking in to the a7cII or the a6700 because the newer color science and features (at least for me) are really valuable
A7IV of course Don't follow the gimmick AI chip or LUT import. They are just there to bait you. Also, fact that buying A6700 or A7CII will not allow you to work in professional industry, at least at second shoot because you only have 1 sd card slot 😂 About color science stuffs, people keep complaining but remember, you shoot photos in raw, and you edit video in 10 bit so tweaking color in post is super easy. I feel like this term of "color science" is just a bait because at the end of the day when doing in-post, you are the one who decide how your image comes out. Last but not least, A6700 used the same sensor as Fx30, and A7CII used the same sensor as A7IV. So basically, in theory and practical for image outcome, they are totally the same 😂 So it's a big A7IV go to me.
Thanks, Ken I do think that from a professional perspective 2 card slots is a determining factor. With that being said, I think to each their own about what features are valuable? I’ve used the a7iv heavily and love it and I think that at the end of the day nothing will beat good exposure and white balance in regards to the final image but have noticed a different and in my opinion better color science out of some of be newer cameras. Thanks for adding to the conversion and all the best 🤙
@@seandewispelaere I guess my first camera that I'm having right now is E10 so I don't really get the term of color sciences hahahaa I'm not judging, I'm just saying because to me everything related to skin tone and colors can be slight tweak in-post to give out a dedication result, even we film with PP off(Mainly I think skin tone, if u work with human cuz I kept hearing the comparison between Sony and Canon color science, and I don't see the crazy reason to switch from Sony to Canon for just that reason 😂)
@@seandewispelaere but the 2 card slots is a must for the professional standard. Like if we don't have it, we can only do our own non-paid video(I mean for other people, not for our youtube channel cuz we can always refilm if our card gets corrupted) 😂
I bought the zve10 a couple weeks ago I am returning it for the a6700 will the batteries I have for the zve10 work on the a6700 or will I have to return it and get different batteries
Testing now 6700 but having a lot of problems with over heating when using on podcast. Have you tested new zv-e10 II? does it have similar over heating problems and what are the differences between 6700 and zv-e10 II?
Hi Sean, is it possible to copy videos from zve10 to my mac when we are in PC remote function (basically when we are using imaging edge app from computer to remote shoot) without changing any setting. Or like we get option to save photos on computer and camera both after shooting from remote app can we do this for video as well. My Nikon camera lets me do it but cant find any way do it with sony zv e10.
This is exactly what I'm stuck with. I started photo/videography for my upcoming dream vacation but while learning to use the ZV-E10 I've got a taste for more... But is it worth upgrading (A6700 is 1700 EUR here) if it's just going to remain a hobby and nothing more?
Nope. If it is for hobby, then wait for Zv e10 mark 2 for better price, could be around 1k1 1k2 I believe. They will never go below that because if they do it, no one will buy the A6700 unless the A6700 price drops down and they need the EVF. Also, FX30 will be killed and never be a "perfect B cam" anymore, because with 1 price u pay for FX30, u already got 2 E10 Mark 2 with the same sensor, better AI and color science.
Hey Which camera best for gym video? Bugget camera suggest me and fx30 or a6700 best for gym video specialy video purpose plz suggest me love from India 🙏🏻☺️
Upgrade is a silly question. They are very different cameras with different use cases. For me there is a case to be made to have BOTH cameras. The A6700 is heavier and does not have Product Showcase so is not as good for vlogging. The ZV-E10 is perfect for social media video and photos. For those who are more serious photographers and indie filmmakers the A6700 is much better. The EVF (for me) is worth gold, the IBIS, while it is only Sony's second rate stabe, is still better than not having it. But then, the ZV-E10 on a small gimbal is way better than the A6700 with IBIS. So for me, the A6700 is a main camera, but the ZV-E10 is a brilliant second camera, but, because of Product Showcase, which is really useful, if I had to choose just one of these cameras, I would choose the ZV-E10.
7:42 bro ZV E 10 has Gyro stabilization it collects gyro data while recording video and stabilizes footage in post production via sony catalyst software, you forget to say in this video.
I don't get the point of this video. It's like comparing a 3 year old Volkswagen Jetta to a brand new BMW M3. 2 completely different things. They're both German Sedans, and that's all they have in common. One is extremely nice, and other is plain and affordable. 2 different markets completely, and one is objectively better if price isn't a factor. Honestly most people really don't NEED the A6700. It's like a professional camera. If you aren't doing professional work, or a pro-sumer hobbyist, you won't need the A6700. Even if you wanna shoot 4k120, there's better options for just that. You can get much cheaper cameras for 4k120 shooting, and 26mp is way more than you need for that. My point is this is an apples to oranges comparison. I think if anything, the FX30 would be a more logical comparison, because that seems like the next step up from the zve10, since it's more of a video centric camera, not a true hybrid like the 6700. Really, I'd say that even though the 6700 is great for video, it's biased slightly more towards photography.
ZV-E10 11shots per second in RAW and JPEG? :-) in your dream buddy ;-) also a huge problem of 4K shooting on ZVE10 is huge vertical deformation of the screen during a movement , its also noticeable in FHD 120FPS, but on 60FPS its FINE....... So I really wonder who tells that there are not so many differences. I bought ZVE10 for video potencial, but its defintiively not good video camera at all..... huge difference in A6700...... ZVE10 is usable only in static mode, and its limited by lens used and fact, it has no stabilised sensor, its usable really only for static vloging... I still love that camera, but definitively, its cheap outdated camera. Its fine in making photos, but video performance is disapointment, A6700 is far far far better camera, and better camera produce more HEAT...... ZVE10 have really low video setting to be used, low possibilities to control video quality.. nah... but still its one of the best value per price cams.... A6700 should be bought in some occassional discounts for interesting prices..... and its quite interesting to compare ZV-E10II with A6700
8:17 bro again zv e10 supports new digital hot shoe capabilities
You’re right, I missed that. I’ll pin this comment to help anyone clarify that point
You really brought it! I've been inhaling these comparison videos, and this is the first time I understood the mapping of the product line. For an indoor video interview shooter, ZV E10 makes a lot of sense, and given it's much lower price point, buying 3 at one time is somewhat possible, resulting in a nicely matched 3 camera shoot. Allocate the savings on bodies, to lenses. On other hand, A6700 is hard to beat for its advanced feature sets, which you spelled out so clearly.
i'm using the ZV-E10.
The things that may push me to the switch is the Autofocus, viewfinder, colorscience and the "different settings for photo and video". Oh. and the dynamic range.
Great video!
Me as well, good points
I have the ZVe10 and have had no complaints. But I am considering the a6700. So, your video has been very helpful. Still haven't decided, but your video is pushing me in that direction.
They are both outstanding. Also, the ZV-E10 II is rumored to come out in Spring '24 so keep that in mind
Thanks for a possible head's up. I'm not in a hurry to switch from my Zve10. The only thing I would love to see added is a viewfinder...so perhaps an updated model will include that? I'm a subscriber and enjoy your videos. Keep them coming.@@seandewispelaere
I did this move. The A6700 is light-years ahead!
It is an impressive camera for sure
I did too but for some reasons I miss zve10. But I couldn't miss the opportunity to get 6700 for $1100
Thanks this is the video i've been looking for! pushed me to go for the a6700
Great, man. Love to hear it.
I used ZVE10 for a year it is good! Just bought the a6700 and really amazed by its quality and performance! Especially the battery life of a6700! Anyway I love these two cameras! From now on the a6700 will be my main camera to shoot video and the ZEV10 for photos and some videos. I only shoot in 1080p so there will not be any overheating issues.
Thanks for sharing, that sounds like a perfect use
Does the a6700 handle noise at high ISO for photography better than yhe zve10? I do wildlife photography with the zve10 but thinking of upgrading if its worth it
I pre-ordered the A6700 but ended up cancelling and just going straight to the ZV-E1, I am so happy I made this leap, it's just a night and day improvement: unreal low light, few extra stops of dynamic range, substantially reduced noise levels across the board, there are so many incredible cheap full frame lenses, it also ended up being more compact than APS-C.
I mean if it's just for Vlog, E1 is a perfect one.
But 90% professional production nowadays won't accept it because of the single card slot.
Instead, I would go with A7iv within the same price.
My line up currently:
Hybrid crop: E10
Cinema: fx30
Hybrid FF: A7iv
@@kptktp_09029 A better alternative is the A7S III, the A7 IV doesn't have 4K 60 without crop or 4K120 and isn't as good in low light. Also neither have the incredibly good AI chip from the A7R V which is prevent on the ZV-E1 so the E1 is still vastly superior in many ways, including portability.
I don't think you are using the E10 or A6700 in professional production either...
I’m a big fan of the ZV E1, enjoy 💯
Solid lineup, Ken
@@DigiDriftZone I know
Obviously if you really have budget, A7s3 is the best lineup in my opinion.(Unless u focus only on video and don't do 50 50, I would go with Fx3 instead)
But with under 3000 and u want both professional aka travelling, A74 is the best one.
I do understand about the crop factor but literally, the Linear Bining on FullHD 120fps already gave you enough quality to do the slow motion(And Honestly, I do 50 50 photo video on a7iv, so that's why i have Fx30 to compensate for that 4k60 10% crop, but if I only need 1 camera, I will bring my a74 with fullHD 120fps)
Yes, 1 card = no production work. That's what E10, E1, A6700 is having.
My first camera was actually E10 and I did a lot of production works on it, but after 1 year and half, I decided to upgrade to Fx30 cuz it gives me the unsafe feeling aka the 10 bit 4 2 2 with dual ISO is wayyyyyy much more flexible for me in post.
Sample from ZV E10: m.ruclips.net/video/BhQn2juyrCI/видео.html
Current E10 user here, out of camera video color at 4K is great for what i do, However, Stabalization is awful on the e10, customization is only ok, its very limited if you want to try and push your skills further. Also, the low light usage isn't very good, actually its terrible. It has its good qualities for a €700 camera, but it will only get you so far if you're looking to push yourself further as a videographer/content creator.
thanks so much for this video man, really beneficial, i was wondering what cam to upgrade to for a while!
It sounds like the a6700 is a really good camera for you. Glad you like the video
At low light, I recomend to get down with exposure use best ISO possible and make photos from RAW. In raw is obviosly less noise than from its JPEG compression, and its more easy to generate your own better output..... but in Video mode, you cannot control nothing, and right, its capable to make bright video in the dark, but at cost of high exposure with extreme low ISO and noise..... :-( ZVE10 really performs bad, really bad...... Its a shame when Osmo Action Cam do a much better job than this, but for sure, withouth lens option, even my Note20Ultra makes better videos :-(
A6700 is a fabulous camera for the price, I have the ZV E10, will stick with that for a while but will upgrade to 6700 eventually (even thought its a little overkill for me, I dont colour grade) . Since your video we now have ZV E10 2 to consider, but given its price i'll skip it in favour of 6700 which has recently dropped $200. Thanks for great review.
EXCELENT REVIEW. I got more context between two cameras,Thanks so. much
Just subbed. Thank You for the detailed comparison.
Welcome to the team 🤙 and thank you I’m glad you liked it
Sony a6700 does seem like a better camera, but personally I am going to stick with ZV-E10 for a while, save up money and get a full frame.
I'm using both, ZVe-10 is my wide cam, A6700 is my bread and butter tho!
ordered my zv-e10 just yesterday, because of the deal breaker you mentioned. As my name suggest,I'm a DJ and i bought it for our monthly stream which i'm going to record the set with. Can't be worrying about camera's shutting down while im playing and doing a stream. So yeah the a6700 might have newer bells and whistles, and the zv-e10 mk2 might lean heavy towards that but it might potentially have the same issue as the 6700 due to the rumoured same battery as the 6700 and body which could give some troubles with heat and recording limits. Edit: Can't freakin wait till mine comes!
So there no photography dynamic range difference between the two?
Great video ! Good comparison, very clear and interesting !
Glad you liked it - thanks for the note
ZV-E10 goes good with the A7C. I upgraded to A6700 to use as a B-cam for my FX30.
bought a zve10 last month and I’m almost regretting not getting the 6700 for that ibis, viewfinder and 4K60fps…
the overheating just saved my money lol great video
Glad to hear that
Hello,
What do the "a", "c", "r" models in Sony cameras tell us? For example, can we say "a" models are photos, "c" models are videos, "s" models are hybrid? Which device would you recommend for both video and photography?
So close to upgrading from my ZV E10 to the A6700 and then saw the FX 30 at 1595 usd at B&H. Now I'm undecided 😂 It doesn't overheat, but it's only 1fps in photo mode, which might be OK.
Always a tradeoff isn't there? ;)
Great comparison!
I have a e10 and planning to upgrade to 6700 for all those superb features, especially in low light conditions, which is a bummer when I take pictures.
But... I guess the price should be a litter lower, maybe around 1k euros for a used gear, cause with 1500 I'd better go for a used a7iv around 2k euros!
Yes, that's 500€ more but it's another level of competition, if you know what I mean
Am I wrong?
Tough call. The a7iv does lack a lot of those newer features. It’s outstanding but I’d consider looking in to the a7cII or the a6700 because the newer color science and features (at least for me) are really valuable
A7IV of course
Don't follow the gimmick AI chip or LUT import. They are just there to bait you.
Also, fact that buying A6700 or A7CII will not allow you to work in professional industry, at least at second shoot because you only have 1 sd card slot 😂
About color science stuffs, people keep complaining but remember, you shoot photos in raw, and you edit video in 10 bit so tweaking color in post is super easy. I feel like this term of "color science" is just a bait because at the end of the day when doing in-post, you are the one who decide how your image comes out.
Last but not least, A6700 used the same sensor as Fx30, and A7CII used the same sensor as A7IV. So basically, in theory and practical for image outcome, they are totally the same 😂
So it's a big A7IV go to me.
Thanks, Ken
I do think that from a professional perspective 2 card slots is a determining factor.
With that being said, I think to each their own about what features are valuable?
I’ve used the a7iv heavily and love it and I think that at the end of the day nothing will beat good exposure and white balance in regards to the final image but have noticed a different and in my opinion better color science out of some of be newer cameras.
Thanks for adding to the conversion and all the best 🤙
@@seandewispelaere I guess my first camera that I'm having right now is E10 so I don't really get the term of color sciences hahahaa
I'm not judging, I'm just saying because to me everything related to skin tone and colors can be slight tweak in-post to give out a dedication result, even we film with PP off(Mainly I think skin tone, if u work with human cuz I kept hearing the comparison between Sony and Canon color science, and I don't see the crazy reason to switch from Sony to Canon for just that reason 😂)
@@seandewispelaere but the 2 card slots is a must for the professional standard. Like if we don't have it, we can only do our own non-paid video(I mean for other people, not for our youtube channel cuz we can always refilm if our card gets corrupted) 😂
I bought the zve10 a couple weeks ago I am returning it for the a6700 will the batteries I have for the zve10 work on the a6700 or will I have to return it and get different batteries
Brother tell me a6700 or a7iii
Testing now 6700 but having a lot of problems with over heating when using on podcast. Have you tested new zv-e10 II? does it have similar over heating problems and what are the differences between 6700 and zv-e10 II?
Until it change flip screen to tilt up down screen, alpha 6000 series will appeal me.
Hi Sean, is it possible to copy videos from zve10 to my mac when we are in PC remote function (basically when we are using imaging edge app from computer to remote shoot) without changing any setting. Or like we get option to save photos on computer and camera both after shooting from remote app can we do this for video as well. My Nikon camera lets me do it but cant find any way do it with sony zv e10.
This is exactly what I'm stuck with. I started photo/videography for my upcoming dream vacation but while learning to use the ZV-E10 I've got a taste for more... But is it worth upgrading (A6700 is 1700 EUR here) if it's just going to remain a hobby and nothing more?
I think that you’ll likely be happy with the ZV-E10 if that’s the case. Might not need an upgrade although the new shiny stuff will always be enticing
Nope.
If it is for hobby, then wait for Zv e10 mark 2 for better price, could be around 1k1 1k2 I believe.
They will never go below that because if they do it, no one will buy the A6700 unless the A6700 price drops down and they need the EVF.
Also, FX30 will be killed and never be a "perfect B cam" anymore, because with 1 price u pay for FX30, u already got 2 E10 Mark 2 with the same sensor, better AI and color science.
Fx30 is wayyyyy better than this two cameras. A true professional camera, not for hobbits.
Sony 6700 vs pocket 3 comparison? Iam waiting.😁
I like it, hit DJI up for me 😉
Hey
Which camera best for gym video? Bugget camera suggest me and fx30 or a6700 best for gym video specialy video purpose plz suggest me love from India 🙏🏻☺️
I like the a6700 a lot for this because you also get quality photo capabilities in addition to great video features
Yes
Zve10 for beginners content creator,
If you are not beginner, pick high level camera.
A6700 camera for hybrid shooter.
Upgrade is a silly question. They are very different cameras with different use cases. For me there is a case to be made to have BOTH cameras. The A6700 is heavier and does not have Product Showcase so is not as good for vlogging. The ZV-E10 is perfect for social media video and photos. For those who are more serious photographers and indie filmmakers the A6700 is much better.
The EVF (for me) is worth gold, the IBIS, while it is only Sony's second rate stabe, is still better than not having it. But then, the ZV-E10 on a small gimbal is way better than the A6700 with IBIS.
So for me, the A6700 is a main camera, but the ZV-E10 is a brilliant second camera, but, because of Product Showcase, which is really useful, if I had to choose just one of these cameras, I would choose the ZV-E10.
Ive been using a ZV-E10 but my A6700 will be here tomorrow.
How is it going with the a6700?
I'm curious why y'all compare these 2 cameras? They're on the different level and a6700 2x expensive than e10
Bro, ZV-E10 also have dual ISO.
That's news to me, are you sure about that?
7:42 bro ZV E 10 has Gyro stabilization it collects gyro data while recording video and stabilizes footage in post production via sony catalyst software, you forget to say in this video.
True, but to be honest I think that extra step will hold a lot of people back
@@seandewispelaere it's not true, this is your opinion., lot's of users in india use this feature, because it's money saving features
6700 vs zv-e1 pleeeeeeease😊
A mind reader I see...
i have the zve10 and i think i will w8 to sony a 6700R coing out
I'd skip both and get a s52x period
I'm using ZV-E10, but after this video I will upgrade to A6700 for sure
Dig it and let me know how you get on with it 🤙
My english very bed, bud i wont say. This different test perfect test🔥
I don't get the point of this video. It's like comparing a 3 year old Volkswagen Jetta to a brand new BMW M3. 2 completely different things. They're both German Sedans, and that's all they have in common. One is extremely nice, and other is plain and affordable. 2 different markets completely, and one is objectively better if price isn't a factor.
Honestly most people really don't NEED the A6700. It's like a professional camera. If you aren't doing professional work, or a pro-sumer hobbyist, you won't need the A6700. Even if you wanna shoot 4k120, there's better options for just that. You can get much cheaper cameras for 4k120 shooting, and 26mp is way more than you need for that.
My point is this is an apples to oranges comparison. I think if anything, the FX30 would be a more logical comparison, because that seems like the next step up from the zve10, since it's more of a video centric camera, not a true hybrid like the 6700. Really, I'd say that even though the 6700 is great for video, it's biased slightly more towards photography.
Your jawline is immaculate
All sony look do digital get a bmpcc4k if u csre about image at alll
ZV-E10 11shots per second in RAW and JPEG? :-) in your dream buddy ;-) also a huge problem of 4K shooting on ZVE10 is huge vertical deformation of the screen during a movement , its also noticeable in FHD 120FPS, but on 60FPS its FINE....... So I really wonder who tells that there are not so many differences. I bought ZVE10 for video potencial, but its defintiively not good video camera at all..... huge difference in A6700...... ZVE10 is usable only in static mode, and its limited by lens used and fact, it has no stabilised sensor, its usable really only for static vloging... I still love that camera, but definitively, its cheap outdated camera. Its fine in making photos, but video performance is disapointment, A6700 is far far far better camera, and better camera produce more HEAT...... ZVE10 have really low video setting to be used, low possibilities to control video quality.. nah... but still its one of the best value per price cams.... A6700 should be bought in some occassional discounts for interesting prices..... and its quite interesting to compare ZV-E10II with A6700
I am the owner of ZV-E10. And I'm going to change it to the A6700, since the ZV-E10 ll disappointed...
ZV E10 w/ Topaz Labs is better than 6700