A lot of extremely old fashioned views, would not be accepted on a modern UK door. That first clip she reacted to could have killed that man. That's why the SIA exists. She isn't working, isn't current and can only represent an industry from a decade ago.
Unfortunately much of what she's saying would not hold up in a court of law, nor would it stop the Security Industry Authority from revoking the licence of a door supervisor if disproportionate force is used. Moreover, "underpants showing" can be cute babe. It follows the dress code of many nightclubs. Many of her views are reflective of "the old way" bouncers used to do things, and outdated for current application. As far as I'm concerned (being a current day bouncer) we want guests to arrive, keep them safe, happy if possible, and leave safe.
I worked on the door for around 22 years, give or take. From when I started in the late nineties, doorstaff like this would have been regarded as 'proper old school' doorstaff, probably only still getting shifts because they were particularly adept at other aspects of the job too. In my area, from probably early 2000's onwards the only way they would have been still getting shifts if they could rein in some of the more extreme views and behaviours. I'd say, again around my neck of the woods from maybe mid 2000's onwards as good as they might be at their job - unfortunately they'd be seen as too much of a risk. A 'liabilty'. It's a real shame, I got 'shown the ropes' by guys from that era and they were brilliant at the job. Unfortunately you'd still get the odd 'punchy' doorstaff and it was quite frowned upon. Around that time, the rot had already started pretty and pretty quickly over regulation and the SIA had run riot and the 'PC Police' were making the job a nightmare.
![BRASIL vs. URUGUAY [1-1] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-hWBAuxF1eY/mqdefault.jpg)
A lot of extremely old fashioned views, would not be accepted on a modern UK door. That first clip she reacted to could have killed that man. That's why the SIA exists. She isn't working, isn't current and can only represent an industry from a decade ago.
Yeah plus the only reason she's throwing her weight around is because she has a lot of it
Yeah ridiculous, she isn’t qualified.
Exactly she obviously hasn't had a top up course
Unfortunately much of what she's saying would not hold up in a court of law, nor would it stop the Security Industry Authority from revoking the licence of a door supervisor if disproportionate force is used.
Moreover, "underpants showing" can be cute babe. It follows the dress code of many nightclubs. Many of her views are reflective of "the old way" bouncers used to do things, and outdated for current application.
As far as I'm concerned (being a current day bouncer) we want guests to arrive, keep them safe, happy if possible, and leave safe.
I worked on the door for around 22 years, give or take. From when I started in the late nineties, doorstaff like this would have been regarded as 'proper old school' doorstaff, probably only still getting shifts because they were particularly adept at other aspects of the job too. In my area, from probably early 2000's onwards the only way they would have been still getting shifts if they could rein in some of the more extreme views and behaviours.
I'd say, again around my neck of the woods from maybe mid 2000's onwards as good as they might be at their job - unfortunately they'd be seen as too much of a risk. A 'liabilty'. It's a real shame, I got 'shown the ropes' by guys from that era and they were brilliant at the job. Unfortunately you'd still get the odd 'punchy' doorstaff and it was quite frowned upon. Around that time, the rot had already started pretty and pretty quickly over regulation and the SIA had run riot and the 'PC Police' were making the job a nightmare.
lol wtf how is she a bouncer
Does the intro apply to the women too are just the men? 🤔
First
Have a gold medal 🥇
@ thank you, it must be my lucky day!