Actually, I think that can be said about a lot of Tim Burton's more recent films. They all still look great, but everything else, like story, character, and acting, have all generally gone downhill.
Seriously, no mention of the fact that this is the first time Burton worked with Helena Bonham Carter and he cast her as a creepy chimp woman then later went on to have two kids with her (and cast her in every film he's done since then to the point that everyone just got sick of it)?
Lots of directors do that, and lots of average actresses get better roles because of it, like Rita Wilson and Kate Capshaw both good actresses but not great actresses but who's going to tell you know when your husband is Tom Hanks or Steven Spielberg? Sondra Locke it's another example, or Leslie Mann which on her own is a good actress but most of her jobs are on Judd Apatow movies, you never successful industry there is some form of nepotism
+Bastardosupremo What's bad about Avatar? The most common complaint I here is "It's Pocahontas in space" but if you just accepted that and moved on, what's actually bad about it? I've never gotten the hatred for that movie. It isn't Schindler's List by any means but for a sci-fi action movie it's pretty good.
+James Gardner Ha! I always said Avatar was Dances with Wolves in blue face now I'm realizing how similar the plots of Dances with Wolves and Pocahontas are.
Chimpanzee 1: Help! The human's about to escape. Troy: Get your paws off me, you dirty ape! Chimpanzee 2: (gasp) He can talk! Orangutans: He can talk! He can talk! He can talk! He can talk! He can talk! He can talk! Troy: And I can siiiiiiiiiiing! Chimp Nurse: Oooh! Help me, Dr. Zaius! Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! O, Dr. Zaius! Orangutan 1: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Troy: What's wrong with me? Dr. Zaius: I think you're crazy. Troy: I want a second opinion. Dr. Zaius: You're also lazy . Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! O, Dr. Zaius! Orangutan 1: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Troy: Can I play the piano any more? Dr. Zaius: Of course you can! Troy: Well I couldn't before. (plays piano) Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
+Pogo Gichel Well, yes and no. What makes this movie closer to the book than the other movies is that SPOILER the main character escapes the planet of the apes and lands back on Earth but it turns out Earth was also taken over by apes just as the planet of the apes was. But the book treats the eventual triumph of apes over humans as an inevitability that happened on both planets independently. The movie on the other hand seems to say that the planet of the apes somehow turned into an exact copy of our Earth with the exact same buildings. Only apes took the role of humans. Either that or the apes somehow left the planet of the apes and conquered our Earth and then decided to continue society exactly the way we humans did right down to the police uniforms. Either of these scenarios is highly unlikely. The book's scenario is also unlikely but I'm willing to cut it some slack considering how old it is. By the way, in the book the planet of the apes is an advanced civilization with guns and cars and cities and stuff.
"From 20th Century Fox comes a landmark of science fiction filmmaking that's still one of the most shocking movies ever ma-- Wait , we're doing the Tim Burton version ? Let's just get this over with." LOL !
valinor100 the way I understood from the movie (never read the book), was that traveling through the wormhole actually puts you back in time. Gen Thade eventually escapes and is able to travel through the wormhole, and go back further in time and finds Earth. He and i assume his army can then conquer a less advance Earth.
gianni bude Well, the ending in the book makes sense and is a good twist. Tim Burton's ending makes no sense at all. The exploratory ship wasn't in orbit around Earth. It was stated in the beginning that they were in another solar system. I can see Wahlberg's character (who can't land a ship to save his life) going back in time at the end, but how the hell did his small scout ship make it all the way back to Earth...randomly? And how did the ape general make it back to Earth (presumably sometime in the 1700's or 1800's going by the Lincoln memorial?) There were no more flyable ships. Unless the apes figured out how to repair/build spacecraft. And wasn't he deposed by the end of the movie? Even if he did go, he would have ended up in a traveling circus or vivisected, not the leader of a nation. Any similarity that ending had to the novel's ending was happenstance. Tim Burton just wanted his own twist ending to "match" the original. BTW, if Marky-Mark had ended up stuck on the planet, who else would have preferred he end up with the ape scientist instead of Estella Warren?
This movie isn't as bad as people say it is, but the ending doesn't make sense at all. Another thing no one realized. How are there horses when there weren't horses on the space ship, or the planet they are on? No, the movie doesn't take place on Earth.
the ending does make sense the planet was earth the entire time, and he goes to the future, and the space station follows him but they arrive early in the future and crash on a barren earth, then he goes back to past earth, which is after the apes take over in rise of the planet of the apes, it makes complete sense.
thebogangamer It wasn't on Earth. It took place on another planet, if you payed attention. If you noticed, there are two moons in the sky. Earth doesn't have a second moon. Where are the cities? It was just a deserted planet. You need to re watch the movie, and ACTUALLY pay attention. Don't deny it, you will know that I am right.
***** dude, your logic is good, but if you look it up you can even find video of the makers talking about the ending and how "we wanted to make the big reveal of how he has been on Earth the entire time something big, something the viewer wouldn't see coming" (though im talking about the original version)
If you listened to the recordings on the ship, they said that they crash landed on a planet. So no, they weren't on Earth the entire time. Earth doesn't have two moons, but the planet they were on had two moons.
***** It says they crashed on a planet because they didn't know they were still on Earth, and theoretically in the future, if the Earth's gravity field were to snag a stray asteroid in its orbit, it could develop a second moon yes.... highly unlikely to ever happen, but possible, especially in the world of movies
@@peposo7 Nope. Twilight's actor's had all the acting talent of a broken toaster. This movie had Tim Roth, Charlton Heston, Paul Giamatti and Helena Bonham Carter but was still a turd with a story that was complete nonsense. "Aperaham Lincoln"
The guy who plays Thade is the reason why I watch this movie over and over again. He just gives such an amazing performance with the ridiculous shit he's given
My guess is that ending meant he was on a post-apocalyptic Earth and when he tried to go back to the past, he ended up going further, and the Apes had remade the world similar to what our world was like. Doesn't make sense, but that's the best I figured.
"Damn you! God damn you all to hell" I never realized this is where Krieger gets it from on Archer. It makes it even funnier when he does it. (With the mannerisms as well)
Wow... Go bad and watch all the original you'll pick up a few more things. Then get the audiobook of Stranger in a Strange Land. Almost have of what you watch comes from those two things. The rest is Shakespeare.
The ending makes sense if you have read the original book. He escaped, landed in Paris, and only when he saw the sculptures realized the apes ruled there also. That was actually the most faithful ending to the book.
What seems to be often overlooked, perhaps because most people watching the movies may not have read the original book by Pierre Boulle, is that the ending to the Tim Burton actually follows the book fairly closely.
MineKynoMine The one possibility I can think of is that the originals were political commentary. They explored the friction between religion and science and race relations. Now the new one could be viewed as less political. That is just a possibility.
Okay, the Aperaham Lincoln thing was the funniest thing in Honest Trailers history, and it wasn't even a joke. How could anybody watching that in theaters not hysterically laugh at such an ending?
mclarenrob2 the villain ape (I'm not even going to try and remember his name) must have found Mark's ship, somehow repaired it, forced Mark's chimp to fly the ship with him, when into the storm thing, when back in time to Earth only thousands of years before Mark's character did, started fucking other chimps (maybe Mark's one, lol), made a civilisation of smart chimps, started making every Chimp believe that humans are evil and must be wiped out, did just that, over the thousands of years the chimps somehow managed to replicate every human landmarks down to the perfect detail, and then we come to the ending. The chimps are the dominant species when Mark arrives and the villain chimp is seen as a god, maybe? Just a theory...
TheMike0088 I can totally see where you are coming from, but that is still a lot of dots for the audience to connect. I still love the movie though, tbh.
There's no such thing as time travel, not without also switching lanes to a parallel reality. It's physics really. This movie is actually very scientifically accurate xD
It is how the original novel by french SF author Pierre Boule published in 1963 ended. The first movie, which was an adaptation of that book had a very similar story line, and a far better ending in my opinion.
I think i nearly cried watching this. I was so upset at how bad it was. My expectations were high because Burton was on board. But even good directors make bad films
Funny how Caesar from Rise of the Planet of the Apes was able to get a more emotional rise out of me considering he's CG and these are actors in costumes.
***** I think that opinion is now outdated. Especially Andy Serkis has proven that time and time again. With the motion capturing techniques nowadays you can almost recognize the actor by his facial expressions, it's uncanny. An actor in a costume however has to wear a mask that away a lot and makes the face look stiff.
One thing to note is that the makeup in this movie was outstanding. Rick Baker is just amazing. this movie failed because of the directing and story above anything else.
Tim Burton should just stay away from remakes( I use that loosely as a blanket term). I hated his remakes of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, his remake of Alice In Wonderland, his remake of Planet of the Apes and even his Sweeney Todd which was critically praised failed to impress me.
***** I already pointed out I was using remake as a blanket term because I knew someone would try and correct me. I just couldn't be arsed writing remake/adaption/reboot/sequel etc. You know what I meant.
It wasn't even Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory! It was Micheal Jackson and the CG firework factory! We didn't need an emotionally scarring backstory or Umpa Lumpas you want to punch in the face.
Hewylewis Really? it looks like a video game with it's obscene amount of cgi, sure it's a more accurate adaption of the book but it just feels soulless and Johnny Depp hamming it up to the extreme as annoying as hell.
Oh, Marky Mark has gone lower than this movie. Remember The Happening? Max Payne? Hell, if you type Mark Walhbergs worst movie, the first thing that comes up is Transformers 4.
Max Payne looked like a flop from the get go, i mean just from the trailers you could see how bad that shit was going to be...i followed my instincts and didn't go watch it on the Big Screen, next thing i know my friends are coming to me like "Don't go watch that shit", and every critic is like "Flop! Flop! Flop! what the fuck is that?". I just know when a movie's a flop! It's like one of my special powers.
The ending was going to be explained in the sequel. Time went backwards in the alternate universe and so the apes there simply got the spaceships working and flew through the time warp to earth. And since the future was the past they ended up far in the past and took over the earth.
Though I agree on so many levels, I would say the movie could have been just that much better (relativity speaking of course) if he had stayed on the ape planet. I mean, he was a planetary hero, brought peace between the nations, and Estella Warren wanted to have his kids....I mean...what could be worse?
no. Mark Whalbergs character goes back in time to an already altered timeline where apes have taken over earlier in our history. and replaced the Lincoln memorial with a statue of General Thade. it was supposed to set up for time-travel sequel/prequels in the same vein as Escape & Conquest of the Planet of the Apes. But those movies never happened.
ygsr That's what I always have in question. How does having "practical" effects and cgi effects make a difference in your movie experience? I'd say if anything cgi effects enhances movies dramatically, because without those you wouldn't be able to as many things as you would without it. It adds so much to the story telling of a movie. Granted some films out there don't take full advantage of this technology and makes it feel underwhelming, but those that the case for every film.
Gotta give the film props for one thing though: those prosthetics looked super fantastic!
And Roth is actually quite good .
Actually, I think that can be said about a lot of Tim Burton's more recent films. They all still look great, but everything else, like story, character, and acting, have all generally gone downhill.
Mad Hatter Burtons problem is that he needs to stop remaking films. His original work is fantastic, but his remakes are always dismal.
Are you still alive ?
Thank you Rick Baker 👏🏻
I'm disappointed that you didn't say "Marky Mark and the monkey bunch" for him in Starring
Omg
GameMinds I like him better when he was in transformers 4
In my years of scrolling through Honest Trailer comment sections Ive never seen a starring line I wished so much was in the trailer.
He said it earlier. It was hilarious.
@@reginaldinoenchillada3513 HIs rap career was referenced, but not specifically the funky bunch.
“Mark whalbergs lowest point since his rap career”
The Happening: “what? No”
Lol at that point it was
Lol exactly 😂
@@kennethdzengedza8978 I think at the point of making this video the Happening already existed
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 but this is a trailer remember it's supposed to be happening presumably at the time of the movie's release
The director of 4 Brothers said Mark didn’t really become an actor until that movie and I see exactly what he meant after watching POTA
Tim Roth is the only reason why I still give this one a watch from time to time!
Wait, "staring at things", "mouth-breathing" - Where's my favorite Twilight stare theme!?
Twilight bought the rights for that and there's crazy fucked up love triangle in this movie anyways.
Literally what I thought of.
Seriously, no mention of the fact that this is the first time Burton worked with Helena Bonham Carter and he cast her as a creepy chimp woman then later went on to have two kids with her (and cast her in every film he's done since then to the point that everyone just got sick of it)?
He also casts Depp in every role...
Lots of directors do that, and lots of average actresses get better roles because of it, like Rita Wilson and Kate Capshaw both good actresses but not great actresses but who's going to tell you know when your husband is Tom Hanks or Steven Spielberg? Sondra Locke it's another example, or Leslie Mann which on her own is a good actress but most of her jobs are on Judd Apatow movies, you never successful industry there is some form of nepotism
I used to like this version but then I watched the 1968 version and cried because that one was so much better.
Petra Leskinen you would just want to expect more from Tim Burton the lousy underachiever
Matthew Sezemebu I did know that there are sequels too but I had no idea what the names were. Thanks for telling me. I gotta watch them. :)
@Amilah the problem is there was good acting "12 man angry"
Watch the others in the original. They are ALL good!
Spoiler: it's a giant deseg apartheid allegory. i don't think it can be redone effectively.
Michael Clark Duncan was one of my favorite actors and even in a bad movie he did good
Well yeah, it's Micheal Clark Duncan. He's fantastic.
No matter how bad the film props must be given for costume and make up effects! was so in love with this film just for that!
Likewise. Agreed
Definitely. Rick Baker was in charge of the ape make-up. He always does a fantastic job even with a subpar film.
i love this film
The ape armour looks badass, especially the helmets the apes wore.
To me it feels so real and believable.
Aperaham Lincon
LOL
meh
they mocking abraham lincon....sad
I get it
came here to post this
3:18 . The cameraman must've been thinking, "I'm shooting a hundred million dollar movie?"
This is one of those movies that I liked when it first came out then watched it years later and realized how bad it was.
***** I don't think Avatar is THAT bad but it definitely hasn't held up.
+Bastardosupremo What's bad about Avatar? The most common complaint I here is "It's Pocahontas in space" but if you just accepted that and moved on, what's actually bad about it? I've never gotten the hatred for that movie.
It isn't Schindler's List by any means but for a sci-fi action movie it's pretty good.
+James Gardner Ha! I always said Avatar was Dances with Wolves in blue face now I'm realizing how similar the plots of Dances with Wolves and Pocahontas are.
Timothy Raths cough....spider man 3 ...... cough
Same, lol
Even director Tim Burton himself hated this movie.
Good for him for disowning it.
The acting was the only good thing in this piece of shit.
***** uhm.. no.. the only good thing was that it ended and lead to the GOOD reboot
Zeb Cheek the makeup for this movie is also phenominal and pretty much the only reason I take a look at it from time to time.
Evan Smothermon I will give it that. The makeup was really good.
Zeb Cheek
Screw you, this one had Marky Mark and a new Funky Bunch
Chimpanzee 1: Help! The human's about to escape.
Troy: Get your paws off me, you dirty ape!
Chimpanzee 2: (gasp) He can talk!
Orangutans: He can talk! He can talk! He can talk!
He can talk! He can talk! He can talk!
Troy: And I can siiiiiiiiiiing!
Chimp Nurse: Oooh! Help me, Dr. Zaius!
Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
O, Dr. Zaius!
Orangutan 1: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Troy: What's wrong with me?
Dr. Zaius: I think you're crazy.
Troy: I want a second opinion.
Dr. Zaius: You're also lazy
. Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
O, Dr. Zaius!
Orangutan 1: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Troy: Can I play the piano any more?
Dr. Zaius: Of course you can!
Troy: Well I couldn't before.
(plays piano)
Orangutans: Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
Dr. Zaius! Dr. Zaius!
This play has everything!
Javert: AND I'M JAVERT!
Meowth: MEOWTH, that's right!
Grace Baer I guess even the Simpson's version is better than the Burton one!
Grace Baer ahh... Old simpsons👍
Here's my honest opinion on this movie,
...I had no idea this existed.
And I wish to return to a time where I still didn't.
I didn't know ever
***** Dude, I made this comment so long ago I don't even remember what this film is like.
+Pogo Gichel Well, yes and no. What makes this movie closer to the book than the other movies is that
SPOILER
the main character escapes the planet of the apes and lands back on Earth but it turns out Earth was also taken over by apes just as the planet of the apes was.
But the book treats the eventual triumph of apes over humans as an inevitability that happened on both planets independently. The movie on the other hand seems to say that the planet of the apes somehow turned into an exact copy of our Earth with the exact same buildings. Only apes took the role of humans. Either that or the apes somehow left the planet of the apes and conquered our Earth and then decided to continue society exactly the way we humans did right down to the police uniforms.
Either of these scenarios is highly unlikely. The book's scenario is also unlikely but I'm willing to cut it some slack considering how old it is.
By the way, in the book the planet of the apes is an advanced civilization with guns and cars and cities and stuff.
me neither😂😂😂😂
"And the creepiest kiss ever"
Even worse than in Sonic 06?
Why are Honest Trailers uploading trailers of the same movie almost at the exact same time as SinemaSins?
Really late answer:
It could be due to fan overlap, the same people demanding the same films from both channels.
Still waiting for a High School Musical Honest Trailer.
"From 20th Century Fox comes a landmark of science fiction filmmaking that's still one of the most shocking movies ever ma--
Wait , we're doing the Tim Burton version ?
Let's just get this over with."
LOL !
Seriously, what was even the attempted explanation for the ending?
gianni bude
Really? That was the actual ending of the book?
valinor100 the way I understood from the movie (never read the book), was that traveling through the wormhole actually puts you back in time. Gen Thade eventually escapes and is able to travel through the wormhole, and go back further in time and finds Earth. He and i assume his army can then conquer a less advance Earth.
Hey
gianni bude
Well, the ending in the book makes sense and is a good twist. Tim Burton's ending makes no sense at all. The exploratory ship wasn't in orbit around Earth. It was stated in the beginning that they were in another solar system. I can see Wahlberg's character (who can't land a ship to save his life) going back in time at the end, but how the hell did his small scout ship make it all the way back to Earth...randomly? And how did the ape general make it back to Earth (presumably sometime in the 1700's or 1800's going by the Lincoln memorial?) There were no more flyable ships. Unless the apes figured out how to repair/build spacecraft. And wasn't he deposed by the end of the movie?
Even if he did go, he would have ended up in a traveling circus or vivisected, not the leader of a nation.
Any similarity that ending had to the novel's ending was happenstance. Tim Burton just wanted his own twist ending to "match" the original.
BTW, if Marky-Mark had ended up stuck on the planet, who else would have preferred he end up with the ape scientist instead of Estella Warren?
valinor100 Apparently there were plans for a sequel that would've explained the ending but because the film wen't over badly the sequel was scrapped.
Say "Kidnapping? I, Call it surprise adoption!"
I honestly didn't even know this existed.
Lol true i new about the old one where the statue of liberty came and obviously the new one but i never heard of this one...
lightcameramakeup i really liked the one made in 2001
lol
You're one of the lucky ones, then.
I get that alot Rien Jen
This movie isn't as bad as people say it is, but the ending doesn't make sense at all. Another thing no one realized. How are there horses when there weren't horses on the space ship, or the planet they are on? No, the movie doesn't take place on Earth.
the ending does make sense the planet was earth the entire time, and he goes to the future, and the space station follows him but they arrive early in the future and crash on a barren earth, then he goes back to past earth, which is after the apes take over in rise of the planet of the apes, it makes complete sense.
thebogangamer It wasn't on Earth. It took place on another planet, if you payed attention. If you noticed, there are two moons in the sky. Earth doesn't have a second moon. Where are the cities? It was just a deserted planet. You need to re watch the movie, and ACTUALLY pay attention. Don't deny it, you will know that I am right.
***** dude, your logic is good, but if you look it up you can even find video of the makers talking about the ending and how "we wanted to make the big reveal of how he has been on Earth the entire time something big, something the viewer wouldn't see coming" (though im talking about the original version)
If you listened to the recordings on the ship, they said that they crash landed on a planet. So no, they weren't on Earth the entire time. Earth doesn't have two moons, but the planet they were on had two moons.
***** It says they crashed on a planet because they didn't know they were still on Earth, and theoretically in the future, if the Earth's gravity field were to snag a stray asteroid in its orbit, it could develop a second moon yes.... highly unlikely to ever happen, but possible, especially in the world of movies
I come back to this video every once in a while just to hear him say “a monkey in a Paul Giamatti suit.” Cracks me up every time
Same lol
I know this is kind of campy, but it’s a guilty pleasure for me. What can I say, I love Tim Burton.
I was so shocked by this movie when I first saw it. I could barely believe Johnny Depp really wasn't in it.
LOL
i never understood the ending for this movie????
I'd rather watch THIS than Transformers Age of Extinction....that was horribly bad...
And still, was a better story than TWILIGHT.
No no no I mistakenly watched this one on cable and I was confused af
@@peposo7 Nope. Twilight's actor's had all the acting talent of a broken toaster. This movie had Tim Roth, Charlton Heston, Paul Giamatti and Helena Bonham Carter but was still a turd with a story that was complete nonsense. "Aperaham Lincoln"
That isn't Mark Wahlberg phoning it in. That's actually him trying his hardest to act.
The guy who plays Thade is the reason why I watch this movie over and over again. He just gives such an amazing performance with the ridiculous shit he's given
My guess is that ending meant he was on a post-apocalyptic Earth and when he tried to go back to the past, he ended up going further, and the Apes had remade the world similar to what our world was like. Doesn't make sense, but that's the best I figured.
"Damn you! God damn you all to hell" I never realized this is where Krieger gets it from on Archer. It makes it even funnier when he does it. (With the mannerisms as well)
Wow... Go bad and watch all the original you'll pick up a few more things.
Then get the audiobook of Stranger in a Strange Land.
Almost have of what you watch comes from those two things. The rest is Shakespeare.
Same
plz say: remember remember the 5th of november, the gunpowder treason and plot, i know of no reason why gunpowder treason should ever be forgot.
please do tropic thunder
Vini Bhatt Agreed!
Search hdpixels on google
Select 1st option
Go to 2nd Popular Post
Click Sponsord link
Have a nice day
OMG Yes this needs to happen.
Say: "Suarez bit my finger!"
LOL that little bitter doe :D
The ending makes sense if you have read the original book.
He escaped, landed in Paris, and only when he saw the sculptures realized the apes ruled there also.
That was actually the most faithful ending to the book.
pro-tip: The Lincoln Memorial is not in Paris.
@@gnaskar I said sculptures. It was the arc de triomph, Louvre, and Eifel Tower in the book. I never said it was the Lincoln Memorial.
Since this is clearly your first time on the interwebs, here's a tip - never defend or attack a movie by referring to "the book"
@@adamsmith-wi3qg I forget, Millennials don't read.
@@0311Mushroom a few of us do, and we also understand it's pointless to compare movies to their literary source material in the YT comment section
The ending to this movie was actually ingenious. It takes a bit to explain, so you'd have to look it up. It has to do with time loops.
Honest Trailer for FIGHT CLUB !
But then they'd be breaking the first rule...
fuck it 17 years passed the time is here
ImpossibleFailer But the second rule!
Ooh...Excellent suggestion!
ImpossibleFailer Then the 3rd rule if not for the 2nd rule!
You guys should do one for Troy. The that was made in 2004.
I second this. that movie was pure shit. exceptionally shit background music
TROY! YES
I personally liked the music, but to each their own.
What seems to be often overlooked, perhaps because most people watching the movies may not have read the original book by Pierre Boulle, is that the ending to the Tim Burton actually follows the book fairly closely.
Say "Don't be a lemon, be a Rose Bud."
What I don't get is that my parents hate the original ones yet praise this one
That simply makes no sense.
William Spencer tell me about it
Have they seen a doctor about this?
MineKynoMine
The one possibility I can think of is that the originals were political commentary. They explored the friction between religion and science and race relations. Now the new one could be viewed as less political. That is just a possibility.
William Spencer That is probably it. My Dad hated the new RoboCop for the exact same reason
u should do honest anime trailers.
God no please never
+TheAlphaFilms
Why?
Elliot Gustafsson fan service fan service fan service fan service...done
How much anime has you acctually watched
Note: yes there's a lot fan service but there is so much more to anime than just fan service
Ok boobs
Something else bad about anime in your opinion?
Honest Trailers: "Planet of the apes"
Me: "that's it?"
Honest Trailers: *"The bad one"*
DO CAPTAIN AMERICA THE WINTER SOLDIER WHEN IT COMES OUT!! Loved the movie but I'd too love to see which flaws it had.
Do Sharknado before the sequel comes out!
I put that comment out there also! Great idea!
say: shrek is love, shrek is life
He did that one xD
ohh, didnt know xD
Shrek is Darude-sandstorm
I wish generic pieces of shit like you would get perma-banned.
Reservoir Chimp 😂
Tim Roth is amazing. I'm sure he's glad now that he was unrecognizable in this
The fault in our stars
THE FAULT IN OUR STARS
The fault in our stars YESSS
YESSSS TFIOS!!
Omg yus THE FAULT IN OUR STARS
"And the Oscar goes to... NO ONE."
ROFL!
Say: You don't win, you survive.
:3
:3
:3
:3
Kearails get that out of here X3
1:33 “In his lowest point since his rap career”
You didn’t know what he was arrested for in 1988?
do fight club
All of the makeup designs are amazing, proof that even today practical beats cgi everytime.
1:09 Wait, is that the Justice League Watch Tower he's leaving?
Makes as much sense as anything else in this movie
Mark's expression at 1:40 always kills me!
Do Abraham Lincoln vampire hunter!
thats a good one
Elijah Eriq yea ikr (no sarcasm)
Please say, "Oo ee oo ah ah ting tang walla walla bing bang!"
Do a honest trailer for Shrek!
Shrek is love, Shrek is life
Darian Iwinski it's all ogre now
Timo Zimti it's never ogre.
summers458 It's not ogre until Shrek say it's ogre.
Darian Iwinski shrek is life shrek is not love.
Okay, the Aperaham Lincoln thing was the funniest thing in Honest Trailers history, and it wasn't even a joke. How could anybody watching that in theaters not hysterically laugh at such an ending?
I still don't understand the ending...
mclarenrob2 the villain ape (I'm not even going to try and remember his name) must have found Mark's ship, somehow repaired it, forced Mark's chimp to fly the ship with him, when into the storm thing, when back in time to Earth only thousands of years before Mark's character did, started fucking other chimps (maybe Mark's one, lol), made a civilisation of smart chimps, started making every Chimp believe that humans are evil and must be wiped out, did just that, over the thousands of years the chimps somehow managed to replicate every human landmarks down to the perfect detail, and then we come to the ending. The chimps are the dominant species when Mark arrives and the villain chimp is seen as a god, maybe? Just a theory...
TheMike0088 I can totally see where you are coming from, but that is still a lot of dots for the audience to connect. I still love the movie though, tbh.
There's no such thing as time travel, not without also switching lanes to a parallel reality. It's physics really. This movie is actually very scientifically accurate xD
It is how the original novel by french SF author Pierre Boule published in 1963 ended.
The first movie, which was an adaptation of that book had a very similar story line, and a far better ending in my opinion.
I think i nearly cried watching this. I was so upset at how bad it was. My expectations were high because Burton was on board. But even good directors make bad films
Say "Rich like a Klingon that be kicking it at the Kremlin, but I'm kicking through your door, call me Kramer Kardashian."
The two funniest trailers both star Markie Mark. This and The Happening. Hilarious!
Say, "Let my people go!"
Prince of Egypt. Nice
@@itsmeitsjakep2410 That line was also in The Ten Commandments 1956, but it's still nice to cone across another Prince of Eygpt fan.
Funny how Caesar from Rise of the Planet of the Apes was able to get a more emotional rise out of me considering he's CG and these are actors in costumes.
Technically he is not just cgi but motion captured. His whole body, facial expression and voice was made by a the great actor that is Andy Serkis.
Alpha Luna I know but you see many people saying that CG characters can never beat an actual actor in a costume.
A great movie is a great movie, a bad movie is a bad movie. Cgi characters can be the same as Jar jar Binks is the opposite to good.
***** I think that opinion is now outdated. Especially Andy Serkis has proven that time and time again. With the motion capturing techniques nowadays you can almost recognize the actor by his facial expressions, it's uncanny. An actor in a costume however has to wear a mask that away a lot and makes the face look stiff.
One thing to note is that the makeup in this movie was outstanding. Rick Baker is just amazing. this movie failed because of the directing and story above anything else.
Tim Burton should just stay away from remakes( I use that loosely as a blanket term). I hated his remakes of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, his remake of Alice In Wonderland, his remake of Planet of the Apes and even his Sweeney Todd which was critically praised failed to impress me.
I loved his ADAPTATION of the original Charlie and the Chocolate Factory BOOK.
***** I already pointed out I was using remake as a blanket term because I knew someone would try and correct me. I just couldn't be arsed writing remake/adaption/reboot/sequel etc. You know what I meant.
It wasn't even Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory! It was Micheal Jackson and the CG firework factory! We didn't need an emotionally scarring backstory or Umpa Lumpas you want to punch in the face.
Hewylewis Really? it looks like a video game with it's obscene amount of cgi, sure it's a more accurate adaption of the book but it just feels soulless and Johnny Depp hamming it up to the extreme as annoying as hell.
Billy Thompson I agree Depp wasn't the best Willy Wonka, but the rest of the movie was pretty damn enjoyable.
“Say hi to your mother for me” 😂 love the Andy Samberg skit reference
do the rush hour trilogy pleeeaseeeee
YEAH!!! One of my favourite movie trilogy's.
Sounds good to me!
***** yea everybody post one so they could do it
also, DO JUMPER
Make a honest trailer of "Maleficent"
Even though you pretty much ruin every movie I watch, I still love you Manly-Voice-Over Guy.
Oh, Marky Mark has gone lower than this movie. Remember The Happening? Max Payne? Hell, if you type Mark Walhbergs worst movie, the first thing that comes up is Transformers 4.
Max Payne looked like a flop from the get go, i mean just from the trailers you could see how bad that shit was going to be...i followed my instincts and didn't go watch it on the Big Screen, next thing i know my friends are coming to me like "Don't go watch that shit", and every critic is like "Flop! Flop! Flop! what the fuck is that?". I just know when a movie's a flop! It's like one of my special powers.
Age of Extinction is actually decent...
Truth About Charlie was kinda weird, too...
I actually liked this movie. I don't see why people hate it so much..,
I still like the film, a childhood favourite of mine!
The ending was going to be explained in the sequel. Time went backwards in the alternate universe and so the apes there simply got the spaceships working and flew through the time warp to earth. And since the future was the past they ended up far in the past and took over the earth.
Do Divergent and Amazing Spider Man 2!
Ya totally divergent!!
Wish making fairy has granted your wish
Just such a good thing we got the 2011-2017 trilogy. Three awesome movies i will never forget
I saw this movie around 2002 when i was a child and i was honestly just like "dafuq"
Same here XD
Everything Gaming After watching this trailer, I'm kinda interested in seeing the original.
Michael Tupper go ahead, it's a classic.
Michael Tupper Yeah, the original is pretty good, a real classic.
+Michael Tupper That one is amazing.... And the end is huge....
I said this a long time ago, and it didn't happen, so I'll say it again:
Say: 'This... is... SPARTA!!!'
Though I agree on so many levels, I would say the movie could have been just that much better (relativity speaking of course) if he had stayed on the ape planet. I mean, he was a planetary hero, brought peace between the nations, and Estella Warren wanted to have his kids....I mean...what could be worse?
"...the bad one." Damn you, Screen Junkies, for making me snort-giggle.
Say "I ate the whole plate. The WHOLE plate."
I always thought his lowest point was The Happening. Or the time he beat a Vietnamese American man half to death.
Right? You think the hate crime would take the top spot..
I’m sure the ending would have made sense in the “what would have been” sequel.
Was that statue of Apebraham Lincoln?
How does that make any sense?
Agent Snacks Ok then
no. Mark Whalbergs character goes back in time to an already altered timeline where apes have taken over earlier in our history. and replaced the Lincoln memorial with a statue of General Thade.
it was supposed to set up for time-travel sequel/prequels in the same vein as Escape & Conquest of the Planet of the Apes.
But those movies never happened.
Michael Gillespie I see what you did there. 😂😂😂
Asking for space jam honest trailer, 5 weeks in a row now.
Do The Fault In Our Stars..
OMG YASSS
YES!!
Say "I am not a crook!"
Planet of the Apes…the Bad One. 😂 So simplistic, but so hilarious!!! 😆
say: screw the rules, I have money.
thx for the +1's guys; as said thx, just wanted to hear honest trailer guy say that with his awesome voice XD, cause i like team 4star
Hell Nyea!!
***** yeah, dunno why i made that mistake, must have been cause i'm used to watch to many t4s videos, but i mean littlekuriboh
*****
You could always edit the comment
Sigh....I miss Yu Gi Oh Abridged
Say "Snake, SNAKE! SNAAAAAAAAAAAKE!!"
Say 'Perhaps it is time that i should pay them a visit'
Say please
I'm waiting for that visit...beside the whole planet...Can't wait to see the battle of five armies :')
I have to say that I love this Movie! The first time i watched this was when I was like 7 and that makes this Movie legendary for me...
Say ''Wake me, when you need me''
3:26 should have been Michael Jackson.
Estella Warren might not be a good actress but you cant't deny that she is Hot
yup, she is beautiful
Does he remind anyone else of Will Poulter (the eyebrows kid from The Maze Runner and We're the Millers) at 1:40?
HONEST TRAILERS OF HONEST TRAILERS!!!!!! YES DO IT!
Please say "The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of Burger King."
Honestly,,,, I liked it
Right?! Like he actually spelled out his entire username, get a room...
ben scott does it matter if they're CG? They are very well acted.
ygsr That's what I always have in question. How does having "practical" effects and cgi effects make a difference in your movie experience? I'd say if anything cgi effects enhances movies dramatically, because without those you wouldn't be able to as many things as you would without it. It adds so much to the story telling of a movie.
Granted some films out there don't take full advantage of this technology and makes it feel underwhelming, but those that the case for every film.
can never unsee the foreplay scene...etched in me brain till the day i die..