Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal's Impactful Lecture at FLAME University
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 дек 2023
- Description: Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal, Member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM), delivered a distinguished public lecture on ‘Process Reforms: Big Impact from Small Changes’ at FLAME University.
Mr. Sanyal, a renowned expert in urban dynamics and economic policy, explained how small, targeted changes can lead to significant positive impacts on economic performance. He also interacted with FLAME University students and faculty, answering their questions and engaging in a lively discussion.
FLAME University aims to provide a holistic education that fosters the exchange of thoughts and ideas and prepares students for the challenges of the ever-evolving global landscape.
#ProcessReforms #SanjeevSanyal #EconomicPolicy #FLAMEUniversity #EAC-PM
We need at least 100 ppl like Sanjeev sanyal to simplify procedures in governments at various levels.
No
Just Modiji is enough
Give me a hundred such committed men, and I will transform the world - Vivekananda
This we call a Kaizens- small but steady improvements bring in the compounding positive effects…person independent hence can be repeated by any
You should employ people under you to train them in looking for suitable processes to reform. It will expedite the whole system.
Please get lot of guys like this in the government to improve ease of doing business, decriminalize businessmen, reduce harassing power of beaurocrats and reduce corruption.
This lecture is impressive in many ways. The speaker, the subject , the venue , the recording and the audience, all appear to be top notch!
This lecture reminded me of Elon musk interview where he said engineers are made to design with so much factor of safety that reiterations of safety process actually created bottlenecks in the system. Process reformers should actually be appointed in each govt business and offices. There are so many practices those are so redundant and useless that it’s frustrating, resource consuming, and attracts middlemen for no reason. Start with building permissions, food license, liquor license, Public sector banks. Kudos for removing compulsory police verification for passports too!
Police verification is still compulsory for getting a passport if you are not a government employee.
This is an excellent point and deserves urgent attention!
I worked as an R&D lead in a US big oil company in the US. safety meetings, periodic online exams, etc., quite unnecessary because most staff and officers who were there for making money (90+%) enjoyed these non-productive times, given that there were hardly any hazardous laboratory works.
Police verification is not removed. But the need of signed stamp from a gazetted clown is removed. Police verification is sensible and still applicable.
What an impactful change is he driving . I find it challenging to drive such changes at work and I can imagine how he does it at the national level . Kudos to him, he is a great administrator !
Hats off to Sanjeev Sanyal Sir. Hope he will be the finance minister of India one day.
Sanjeev sanyal is a gem💎
The importance of Data Analysis can actually create massive reforms. Great work by Mr Sanyal. Have been following him since 2017.
Guy like him should become Bengal CM someday!
Bongs would be aghast at this suggestion. they are content with Momta and Mahua
Far more impact at the central level.
He'll be better suited as our next FinMin. Bengal needs an organic Bengal-born CM, as true change can only happen from within
😂😂 bongs produce per capita most number of wokes.
@@rutvikrs bro he grew up in Kolkata all his childhood.
Both his parents are Bangali and he speaks bangla too.
Sadly his pronunciation is not that good.
Mr Sanjeev sanayal u r doing great service to the nation . Putting all this effort to look deeply in indian system to know what r the problems
These are great reforms. Would love to see some business leaders also discussing how these "process reforms" help and how are we working on these reforms for the future. Thanks to Sanjeev Sanyal!
Kudos to Mr Sanyal. Another way is to basically accept that any act pre 1947 could not be designed for transparency. Every act should not get amendments. They have to be rewritten because great areas were created ( and remain) and designed very carefully. By design no final decision could be made unless the sahib returned from shikar. The entire bureaucracy loves old laws.
Very well said sir!
Fact there are many processes which is not essential .see I was in govt set up being govt doctor to visit abroad file goes to minister
And file will never cone back and u can't visit. GOING abroad even for srilanka is going to America. Process is too long that people will not tell and go and if some one is caught you are suspended or they will harass you .similarly time scale promotions are given and to get scale file goes to secretary level and they behave like God .I had to approach high court to get first acp scale .This is so frustrating that people will not like to join govt service.
Similarly to get LTC file goes to secretary same fate
Similarly transfer file to cm and it is difficult to change statation and u have to bribe.
System of purchase of drugs is outdated Head of state hospital is vested with 2000 Rs power. How u can run hospital .
No chairs no ac no coolers in state run hospital
I
List is too long that It shames me that how we are governed. THESE ias are like demigod .They will not like to meet common man
Any act before 47 could not have been designed for growth of Indian economy
No need to blame politicians because they come and go. It's the bureaucracy that will not allow change and so they will prefer amendments for which it is easy to add another appendix subject to another condition.
I'm a Medical student, no relation with economics, commerce, Polity, or administration, still it's lovely to listen to an intellectual like him who is sitting at the core of the engine that drives Indian economy and policy making. Big fan here!
Learnt something new on inefficiencies that exist in administrative processes! I can assure you GenAI will help identify such process inefficiencies , create dependency maps, create additional content ( agencies involved) , integrate all informational assets and orchestrate entire process for quick decision.
Just fantastic to get insight from Mr Sanyal. Thank you
Our laws need to be reformed and liberalized tremendously
Excellent session by Sanjeev. We need to more of these sessions to communicate to young minds. There was a time when business people were looked at as thieves and there was so much of mistrust. Let the business rules simplification processes continue.
It's always pleasure to watch Sanyal sir
Great lecture on initiatives which made a huge impact
Industrial engineering, time studies, work flow analysis, six sigma, lean manufacturing, system engineering... the ideas are similar. with varying levels of change... improvements by process reform. Very good cases presented as always by the erudite yet down to earth Sanjeev Sanyal.
Thanks to Modi ji for selecting people like Mr. Sanjeev Sanyal.
Brilliant lecture
Wonderful deliberation... 👍👍👍👍 what a great initiative of FLAME... 👍👍👍👍👍
The procedural incremental innovations is a good find for improving the efficacy of structural reforms. I wish more publicity is given to these through media for the benefit of public at large in the country and abroad.In particular,to the students if Economics.
Dhanyavad 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Amazing insights. We need more people like Sanjeev sir.
You inspire me to contribute more towards improving भारत
Awesome Sanjiv 🎉
Very insightful and wonderful session one of my fav economist by sanjeev sir you are great logical person explained each thing very practical way of mind 🙏
I’ve observed this since the Axis ceo spoke at flame a decade ago. The owners/management always hog up all the first rows in that tiny amphitheater
I liked the term "Rent Seeking"
Nicely explained
Good explanation!
Thanks ❤️
Was there an Q&a session if so can you please upload it.
😮👌
Great Indian economy ,
December 2023 and only 30% students placed in IIITs
Excellent 👌
Question:
What percentage of patents granted became commercially successful (earning royalty)?
Thank you 🙏
Wow
Actually it's the rules framed by bureaucracy which defeats the purpose of the law enacted by the legislative. Standing Committees of Law Ministry should also review the Rules framed under a law after the enactment of a law is over.
👍👍👍
in rural india sustainaible development should be there not the city type, organic building , library , plumbing , organic crops , indigenous seeds .....freight trains , good roads , organic art and craft textile but necesssary gadgets , useful mechanisation to replace tedious job but nothing on industrial strnght which causes mononply, destroy resources , ecology , mental , physical health
❤
Sanjeev ji
We need a Sushasan Divas, one day in a Year when administrative issues are reviewed.
All Forms of all departments should be reviewed and complaints received and discussed.
All Ministers, MPs, MLAs, & Gazetted Officers should fill up at least 1 [ one ] form pertaining their department, i.e., Minister for External Affairs should fill up a Passport Application,
Finance Minister must fill up an IT Return or GST Return. etc.
All Govt websites should be reviewed and complaints answered.
All complaints, grievances, etc., pending for more than say 1 or 3 months must be cleared.
Great suggestion 👍👌👏
Why not put it on the my gov portal?
Sanjeev sir 🤚🤚🤚😎
never heard of this university
Corruption free systems and robust governance are wanting! Isn’t it so!
WHAT A PRAGMATIC ECONOMIST.
MAY GOD BLESS US ALL.
🔞🔞🔞🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Subject change success in the situation of men and boys are necessary to be in the world of talking about the answer is here to view the
No matter how much effort is put in, the government won't be able to remove the mandatory provision for mediation.
Why?
@@alok6422 the lawyers will never let this happen and the judiciary is hand in glove with them.
I don't think he's talking about 'removing'...it should simply be made voluntary
@@milindu8919'Removing' in my original comment meant removing the mandatory provision i.e. making it voluntary.
There are a lot of legal requirements which effectively exist merely to act as a source of income for lawyers. Unfortunately they have a strong lobby. Hence I don't see the mandatory provision going anywhere.
@@xiji3802 I agree....we saw a similar lobby against the farm reforms as well
Gst तब ज्यादा effective हो पाएगा। जब gst की एक दर 14 से 15 परसेंट रखी जाए। अभी कोई भी दुकानदार बेचता महंगे gst product है लेकिन CA वकील की हेल्प से कम gst प्रोडक्ट की सेल ज्यादा दिखाता है। for example किरयाने वाला बेचता कुछ है दिखाता कुछ है। जब एक दर होगी। उस दिन उसे ईमानदारी से भरना पड़ेगा। फिर केवल कैश ही एक अपवाद बचेगा। एक डर लागू होते ही इकॉनमी 2 साल में ही 3rd लार्जेस्ट इकॉनमी हो जाएगी।
Don't mean any disrespect, but Process reform = Process re-engineering, which has been around for decades
Yes. He has just relabeled something, which almost everyone in the government has been doing since long. Also as he is in the EAC, he is expected to find such lacunae to bring out 'process reforms'. They are not as novel as he is projecting them to be.
@@xiji3802
Full credit to them though, as they Are getting things done.
In fact, Process Function in Organizations is the most disrespected function, particularly, the IT Industry as bloated egos of the technical guys think that they are a gift to the nation. A lot of smoothening of the flow of work happens due to many process changes. The Function also does not get the support of the Top Management in many organisations. Through out the presentation, I was feeling the Dr Sanyal is boasting a lot about the entire work as if he invented a new stream in Economic Reforms. He should look at the Manufacturing and IT industries for the process activities that are done.
@@suryavangara3537 I do agree. At one place he says how he has 'mocked the bureaucrats enough'. While they do exactly what he is doing.
@@aryaman05 not discrediting the reforms brought. I am just pointing out that it is nothing novel as projected to be.
This short of processes reforms made by you and your department disbalances parties from INDI Alliance not to understand what's going on in this country and how PM Modi is going to make India the Third largest economy in next 5 years.
Creative destruction. Hmmm that is the Hindu concept embodied by Lord Shiva - the concept that creation and destruction go hand in hand.
Honestly, it sucks Bengal gives genuises like him and yet, every year that state becomes more of a sh*thole of India
It is interesting, but it is boring.
This gentleman can only speak in English and nothing else. He is a BJP follower in stricter gesture.
Yes particularly Narendra Modi. And there are Nobel Laureates like Amartya sen who never supported or followed any politician like Mamata Banerjee. Am I right sir? Or should I write in Bengali?
BJP had initially opposed the GST introduced by Congress. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provides relief to wealthy individuals who owe money to taxpayers.
BJP did NOT oppose GST per se. In fact the first mention of GST was in the last year of Vajpayee government.
However when you replace excise by GST, the states rhat produce more than they consume are lovers as far as tax goes. So Gujarat and Tamil Nadu (which by the way is NOT a BJP state) wanted assurances from Congress government that their revenue loss will be compensated st least first few years. Congress was unwilling yo give that assurance. Jaitley did.
Please do not spout the deliberate lies and disinformation spread by Congress.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code does NOT provide relief to the wealthy. They lose their companies which go to new owners and money is given to creditors. Example Shashi and Ravi Ruia had to sell Essar Oil. Dhoot had to sell Videocon. Earlier a company could be loss making, its employees and creditors including MSMEs would suffer while the owner continued to live large.
@@gauravipal9518: It's a Fact when Manmohan Singh tried to bring GST all BJP states had opposed it. Today they can not claim to have introduced GST.
@@pardeeptandon He literally just explained the reason BJP opposed congress version of GST you just discarded and keep repeating your bullshit.