1440p native with "optimized" settings barely 70? I expected more than that with my 6800XT, and this a freaking 4080S. People can say whatever they want this is optimized like shit.
The graphics look amazing, but I can't help but feel like games are becoming entirely too demanding, especially with the issue of UE5. Getting 30-40fps on any game at native resolution with a 4080 Super is insane. We might start seeing diminishing returns as games start to look lifelike, as we get 20 fps with high end GPUs. Just my opinion though
You are absolutely right. This game is well optimized but still has some UE5 stutter and textures popping in and out on occasion. I'm having a great time with it but wish it was smoother. I'm playing 4k with a 4090/7800x3D combo. Maybe 1440p is the way to go.
Games can look incredible without having to go for full realism, in fact, I think games with a great artstyle and great gamedesign always look better than any hyperrealistic game that's coming out. This realism is pretty boring imo, no creativity, nothing new, just unnecessarily demanding.
@@mr.t3782 I'm playing 4K using HB optimized setting (rt performance, 50% DLSS) with a 4080/5800x combo. I just beat tiger vanguard and I'm getting 50-65 fps.
Bro, game uses ue5 software lumen even when rt is off. You cannot completely get rid of raytracing. If there would be no raytracing it would perform better. Look at how amd gpus run this game. You can ask modern devs why they are not optimizing games for 300 fps at all times
@@ArchieBunker11 Can you give an example of a game from 2017-2019 that the GTX 1080TI plays at such low framerates at effective 1080p dumbed down settings (I think timewise, that is a fair comparison)?
@@konstantinlozev2272 can you give me an example of a game in 2019 running on the 1080ti using graphics rendering tech that was though to be impossible to run? Or are you deliberately forgetting that part of the equation?
@@ArchieBunker11 Literally all features of DX 12 that did not exist in DX11. Same for DX11 Vs DX 10. Also, let's not forget that the RTX 4080 is a USD 1k GPU of a third generation in a row that purports to run raytracing.
I'm happy with 1440p, cinematic preset, dlss res at 85,rt at very high, frame gen on and get 90-100fps. Don't feel sluggish at all, even the few times it drops at 85. It looks so good and it deserves to be played at max settings. Great game!
For 1440P, all cinematic and very high ray tracing with DLSS Quality and FG ON and you're getting it all. PS: DLSS slider doesnt work. Only categories work. Try 89% when Quality kicks in and 66%, same performance!
With RT looks like a new game, so much better. Next gen games will look nice. 4070Ti should max it with frame gen, doesn't seem more demanding than alan wake.
It's really, really fun. The graphics are (of course) great, the combat is fun, and the cutscenes are amazing. If there's one downside, it's that it can be a bit difficult to find your way around.
@@Atzmn are you actually serious or fanboying much ? The technical mess at launch, over promising, under delivering, choices that don’t really matter, broken mechanics and etc I’m not saying the game is bad In fact I’m playing it rn But it was the definition of overhype
looks like optimization is a mess.. yes its UE5 but this is too much... RX5700XT and RTX 2060 is recommended.. can they even run 1080p medium setting in 60fps.. EDIT: just checked.. nop they can not 5700XT 1080p medium is 50+fps... GPU that is recommended should run very high setting in 1080p 60fps
I'm not sure how I feel about low frames on Cinematic. Black Desert Online is 9 years old and has 4K Remastered, Cinematic as well. I can't get 60 in that either. The goal is cinematic and they tell you time and time again, it's not for playing. I messed with the Benchmark in this and I had no issue getting playable frame rates with 4K Very High. I tried 1440 and 4K and it's a UE5 thing. I don't see a difference. I run a 7900XTX but outside RT scenarios, I don't see a difference between a 4080 Super and a 7900XTX. They trade half a dozen frames game to game.
I’m getting 140-160 so far on my 7900xtx with HUB optimized Quality settings 1440p 100% render and FSR Frame Gen. solid game so far too. That wandering guy is a pain in the ass though. I beat both of the wolves and left him to come back to lmao
@@mmremugamesmm Hardware Unboxed made a video that came out yesterday where they showed what settings worked the best for graphical quality and performance uplift. Some of the settings don’t give much detail at cinematic that’s worth keeping them so high. So turning down key settings to high can give back a lot of FPS without hurting the overall image
@@silverwerewolf975 that’s how I feel because that’s actually where your hardware is and it’s really sad that all these new graphics cards are struggling
Ive got the 4070ti super and its amazing in any game i throw at it i wont think of upgrading for a long time either when the 5080 super releases years from now or when the 6080 releases if im still happy with the performance by then
Playing this game at 200fps feels damn good. I turned down the ray tracing, the game looks good without it. 4090 3440x1440 Quality preset Full ray tracing off High graphic settings Framegen on =200 fps lol
I'm playing the game with fullRT and my fps are smooth as butter on the RTX4080S. At 4K DLSS performance + FG, very high settings, fullRT I get 85fps in the built-in benchmark, and 70-110fps during gameplay (performance can dip to around 72-75fps during the boss fight in the water and even then game is playable). At 1440p DLSS Quality + FG I even get higher framerate 115fps, but I get much better image quality when I downscale (DLDSR2.25x) 4K to my 1440p monitor, therefore I prefer to run the game at 4K. I used to see some traversal stutters from time to time (nothing game breaking), but now I don't see them anymore at all (maybe the latest patch or windows update fixed it). The game is a joy to play and it looks stunning in full RT. Of course, I use FG to get perfectly smooth experience, but since DLSS FG works so well, I don't really care. This particular game is more responsive with FG on (48ms with FG on, 60ms without at 67fps base).
The difference between Full RT medium and the game's Cinematic settings is small in terms of performance (on NVIDIA GPU's). So you can see the whole software RT approach with Lumen kind of doesn't really work well for people with NVIDIA cards. Only thing i think that the cinematic reflection setting looks better than Full RT at medium. But the shadows are soooo much better, that i am willing to sacrifice a bit of this reflection clarity. And probably reflections are still more realistic at RT medium, just not so pretty.
Love the videos Krispy! I have a regular rtx 4080.. do you recommend quality dlss or dlaa at 4k with frame generation? No ray tracing cause of the damn stutters
If I had a 4090, I would use RT, but I have a 4080s, I didn't really have any problems playing without RT. I couldn't really feel anything other than the shadows getting darker. And the difference between DLSS quality and performance isn't noticeable at 4k.
I'm with you on that. I also have 4080S and have 0 interest in RT. Bought this gpu to be able to play at 4K thanks to the DLSS. 4K HUB Quality preset + dlss quality + frame gen. Solid 100fps with high resolution and graphical settings is much more preferable to me than some unneccessary lights that take %50 of my fps.
@@maciekprokop3780 it's pretty good. The only thing is matter is how devs integrate FG into game. Because sometimes it's great, sometimes it should be turned on only in the case of emergency. In BM:W it's like normal, idk
The recommended specs for ray tracing at ultra according to the creators is 4k at high with the 4080 super and dlss 50% I’m playing that way and it works more than fine
For some reason, I can't get your smooth performance. I have a 4080S and an I714000k and I get MASSIVE frame spikes ranging from 110 all the way down to 70. sometimes drastically dropping performance mid combat. I don't really understand what I'm doing wrong here. 1440p DLSS 50, RT medium, and I am on very high settings. Frustrating when I have a 2800 dollar rig and 800 dollar monitor and I can't even get a smooth experience. ANY help would be greatly appreciated.
@@zWORMzGaming No. No it's not. True actual performance tests that are scoring a native rasterized resolution rendering do not include the use of any artificial intelligence processed spatial anti-aliasing. Even some recent titles don't even include DLAA while others force it. Native is native. Any AI software used will make it no longer native. DLAA is the same as DLSS but uses native resolution alone rather than including a additional upscale process. DLAA most definitely will change the actual image/performance on a native rendered resolution. Or why would it exist? DLAA algorithm does improve image quality and sometimes at a slight performance hit. It's a AI powered software solution that alters the image before the image is sent to the display. Not native. Native has no other help.... Ever. You're wrong.
Hey Kryzzpo! Love your 4080 Super videos. I own one too. I have a 13700k and 4080 Super. I only get between 85%-97% GPU utilization. Is it because I am running DDR4 ram? This is with most games not just Wukong. Thanks
I asked this before on your last video but are you going to Benchmark Final Fantasy 16 PC Demo? This game has high requirement so really curious as to how good or how poorly it runs on below minimum GPUs!
Hello, been watching your videos lately since im planning on buying a new pc but I really cant decide if I should wait for the 5080 or go with the 4080S, since my budget isnt infinite (around 2500euros), and I'm asking this because I want to have the PC connected to a 4K Tv to use it like a "console" for single player games and have it connected to a monitor for when I want to play competitive. what would you and the community recommend? (ps: PLAN TO KEEP THE PC INTACT FOR 5-7 YEARS LIKE MY CURRENT 1080 BUILD)
Literally just got myself a prebuilt with 4080super Good thing I don’t care about 4k But moving up to 1440p from 1080p doesn’t sound appealing anymore😅
It was absolutely not the 4070's fault. anyway i play 4070 on 27 1440p monitor dlss performance frame gen on optimized/quality with ray tracing very high 80/100 frames (1440p dlss performance = 1080p dlss quality)
@@Fiwek23452 frame gen...more fps, more input lag, just another bullshit, a 4080s with a 7950x3d should get easily 60+ fps in native 4k without extra bs like dlss, frame gen and whatever else is out there
most of the time the recommended and minimal PC specs are for Medium/Normal settings. And sometimes going from med to high alone can tackle performance even on high end gpu's , let alone ultra or maximum settings that sometimes are clearly just intended for screenshot at the time the game launch
Thx for the video. It's crazy, but the hair quality in ultra or cinematic makes the flicker shadows. This could be a bug. I tested it with the RTX 4090 in 4K.
By the way, the "slider" doesn't really work as a proper slider but more as a mode selector for the selected upscaling method: so for example, when you're going down to "DLSS Quality" area, it doesn't matter if you're at 80 or 67%, you are just selecting DLSS Quality. TL;DR: the % within the same quality level doesn't mean anything at all, it is just a visual & fancy way of selecting a given upscaler's quality levels. Hope this helps!
What are u trying to say? If u put it on 80% it literally does scale from only 80% resolution. It says it's DLSS quality at anything above 67 and below 99. But the slider works perfectly fine.
@@shreyass5756 I was trying to explain that the % within the same quality level doesn't mean anything at all, it is just a visual & fancy way of selecting a given upscaler's quality levels.
@@Hateroz but that is literally not true. As I said if u select 80% resolution scale at 3840*2160 it scales only from 3072*1728 which is 80% and not 2560*1440 which is 67%. The scaler is doing its job right. It affects from what resolution u want to scale from. It doesn't just default to *quality* regardless.
watching from my monitor on 1440p youtube and monitor 1440p but why youtube always look bad quality i mean when u pl;ay this on your own monitor and pc it will blow your mind the graphics and quality right?
Is it worth disabling some cores to match the 7800x3d if I have a 7900x3d? I see him do this in every video and I’m curious how he does it and how much of a difference it can be with a 7900x3d
the cinematic settings in unreal engine is not used for gaming i do not know why the devs put this in the game for the users no one should use this preset, for gaming use just epic, high, mid or low
Ekceli even Epic or Ultra should not be used in Unreal Engine titles. Cinematic were meant for cinematics only. High should be the first start, and then Very High if you have more to spare. Ultra is reserved for the future GPUs but yeah max visual fidelity and expensive GPUs wouldn't want to miss a thing. It's called graphics FOMO. 🤷♀
I dont get it, i have a 4080 super + ryzen 5 7600x and play this game at 1440p with cinematic settings + raytracing on medium I get around 120 fps max and 90 minimum...how is this bad?
Yeah, people try to cope and set some medium settings with their "optimized" techniques with all the fake frames and resolution downscalers enabled. After that they call it a very well optimized product...
people don't understand how sad this is... and it makes no sense developers launch a game that you cant play it even on the best gpu on the market... the world is ending
![MISSING: SLIM SHADY [Expanded Mourner’s Edition Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xh8qgHrOO1g/mqdefault.jpg)
Black myth : wukong minimum requirement : ryzen 4070
Zach what have you started 😭
For 1440p ? Yeah 😢
@@purabisaha1963720p*
Don't insult Ryzen 4070 like that. That thing can even play 8K native with no problem.
forsen was up to something with that RTX4080 for 1080p resolution thing. Hes never wrong...
Me staring at my 4060 : why can't you be like your older brother
Coz that ain't fed with enough dollars
Cause you’re a terrible parent
4060/4060 Ti: You guys always act like you're better than me!
4070, 4070 Super, 4070 Ti Super, 4080 Super, 4090: 🤨🤨?
It has nearly half the cuda cores and nearly half the memory bandwidth (at more than half the price) compared to the 4070.
Your first mistake was buying a 4060 lol
1440p native with "optimized" settings barely 70?
I expected more than that with my 6800XT, and this a freaking 4080S. People can say whatever they want this is optimized like shit.
Yes,shit 💀
Literally haha
That XT would RIP with RT on. 😮
@@ehenningsen he was using rt off on that chart and that is was i meant
I dont care about rt
@@silverwerewolf975 of course. I was being goofy.
The graphics look amazing, but I can't help but feel like games are becoming entirely too demanding, especially with the issue of UE5. Getting 30-40fps on any game at native resolution with a 4080 Super is insane. We might start seeing diminishing returns as games start to look lifelike, as we get 20 fps with high end GPUs. Just my opinion though
You are absolutely right. This game is well optimized but still has some UE5 stutter and textures popping in and out on occasion. I'm having a great time with it but wish it was smoother. I'm playing 4k with a 4090/7800x3D combo. Maybe 1440p is the way to go.
Games can look incredible without having to go for full realism, in fact, I think games with a great artstyle and great gamedesign always look better than any hyperrealistic game that's coming out. This realism is pretty boring imo, no creativity, nothing new, just unnecessarily demanding.
@@mr.t3782 I'm playing 4K using HB optimized setting (rt performance, 50% DLSS) with a 4080/5800x combo. I just beat tiger vanguard and I'm getting 50-65 fps.
Not using FG BTW.
Devs are going console way. Slowly trying to enforce 30fps as new normal
Just perfect! Effective 1440p with dumbed down settings on a USD 1k GPU!
Its $1000 competitor gets half the framerate, and this is running settings people thought were impossible a few years ago. Whats the problem?
Bro, game uses ue5 software lumen even when rt is off. You cannot completely get rid of raytracing. If there would be no raytracing it would perform better. Look at how amd gpus run this game. You can ask modern devs why they are not optimizing games for 300 fps at all times
@@ArchieBunker11 Can you give an example of a game from 2017-2019 that the GTX 1080TI plays at such low framerates at effective 1080p dumbed down settings (I think timewise, that is a fair comparison)?
@@konstantinlozev2272 can you give me an example of a game in 2019 running on the 1080ti using graphics rendering tech that was though to be impossible to run? Or are you deliberately forgetting that part of the equation?
@@ArchieBunker11 Literally all features of DX 12 that did not exist in DX11. Same for DX11 Vs DX 10.
Also, let's not forget that the RTX 4080 is a USD 1k GPU of a third generation in a row that purports to run raytracing.
Here lies: the 4080 super tried to run black myth wukong at 1440p max settings with raytracing
Over 1k and cant get 60fps without ray tracing. Yikes
Comment may wrongly suggest that GPU is inadequate while it's the game developers that lack skills to optimize their game.
@@StarFury2 It's a Nvidia sponsored title. How can we enirely blame the developers.
@@StarFury2 you’re not a developer, so don’t say things you don’t understand.
You realize that Wukong uses Lumen right? that's... ray tracing also.
@@breadone_ I'm a C++ dev, and I can confirm that you have no idea what you're spouting now.
zWORMz Gaming, nice video I really liked it
Thank you 😃
@@zWORMzGamingplease test i3 n305
Rtx 4080s "its playable its not terrible experience" 😂
Its running settings people thought were impossible a few years ago.
damn i just finished the 4070 one and this pops up immediately
Same
My man is on the Black Myth Wukong grind 😂❤
Can u test out Doom 2 RTX?
Legends with integrated graphics 🗿
I'm happy with 1440p, cinematic preset, dlss res at 85,rt at very high, frame gen on and get 90-100fps. Don't feel sluggish at all, even the few times it drops at 85. It looks so good and it deserves to be played at max settings. Great game!
We really need the 50 series soon so we can max out current games
is any of thos with ray tracing i asume not or the game is that much better optimised then the benchmark tool
Please protect this guy at all costs. This is thebonly channel I will go to for benchmarks. Well done Krispy creme
Kryzzp‘s PC after installing three different GPU’s within 10 hours: 🤰
For 1440P, all cinematic and very high ray tracing with DLSS Quality and FG ON and you're getting it all. PS: DLSS slider doesnt work. Only categories work. Try 89% when Quality kicks in and 66%, same performance!
With RT looks like a new game, so much better. Next gen games will look nice.
4070Ti should max it with frame gen, doesn't seem more demanding than alan wake.
Considering buying this game
It's really, really fun. The graphics are (of course) great, the combat is fun, and the cutscenes are amazing.
If there's one downside, it's that it can be a bit difficult to find your way around.
it's solid, but it's way overhyped
@@_n8thagr8_63it’s really not, Cyberpunk was overhyped
This one was just hyped
@Eldron2027 how was cp overhyped? Its one of the best games of the past decade
@@Atzmn are you actually serious or fanboying much ?
The technical mess at launch, over promising, under delivering, choices that don’t really matter, broken mechanics and etc
I’m not saying the game is bad
In fact I’m playing it rn
But it was the definition of overhype
I guess Nvidia got to give us a reason to buy the 50 series
looks like optimization is a mess.. yes its UE5 but this is too much... RX5700XT and RTX 2060 is recommended.. can they even run 1080p medium setting in 60fps..
EDIT: just checked.. nop they can not 5700XT 1080p medium is 50+fps... GPU that is recommended should run very high setting in 1080p 60fps
I'm not sure how I feel about low frames on Cinematic. Black Desert Online is 9 years old and has 4K Remastered, Cinematic as well. I can't get 60 in that either. The goal is cinematic and they tell you time and time again, it's not for playing.
I messed with the Benchmark in this and I had no issue getting playable frame rates with 4K Very High. I tried 1440 and 4K and it's a UE5 thing. I don't see a difference. I run a 7900XTX but outside RT scenarios, I don't see a difference between a 4080 Super and a 7900XTX. They trade half a dozen frames game to game.
I’m getting 140-160 so far on my 7900xtx with HUB optimized Quality settings 1440p 100% render and FSR Frame Gen. solid game so far too. That wandering guy is a pain in the ass though. I beat both of the wolves and left him to come back to lmao
What is this HUB you are talking about. I’ve seen others mention it.
@@mmremugamesmm Hardware Unboxed made a video that came out yesterday where they showed what settings worked the best for graphical quality and performance uplift. Some of the settings don’t give much detail at cinematic that’s worth keeping them so high. So turning down key settings to high can give back a lot of FPS without hurting the overall image
@@MotoMedicine904 ok thank you, I’ll check it out
And the real fps? No one cares about fake frames, you can measure that
@@silverwerewolf975 that’s how I feel because that’s actually where your hardware is and it’s really sad that all these new graphics cards are struggling
They graduate from so many universities, yet they can't properly code an optimization. We endure the hardships while they enjoy the benefits
ill get this one when it's on sale and with all new updates for a even better experience😂
My pc will spit on me if I run this game
Ive got the 4070ti super and its amazing in any game i throw at it i wont think of upgrading for a long time either when the 5080 super releases years from now or when the 6080 releases if im still happy with the performance by then
Playing this game at 200fps feels damn good.
I turned down the ray tracing, the game looks good without it.
4090
3440x1440
Quality preset
Full ray tracing off
High graphic settings
Framegen on
=200 fps lol
A 7900xtx video would be awesome 😎
Can you test the 6700xt next? 😊
What is the app used for the stats? RTSS or something else? If it's RTSS, what are the settings?
Would be really nice if you could have access to a 4090 so we can see how well it can do in newer games
Question : Post 29:25 using the frame gen at higher fps, do you notice a lot of input lag or aiming for even higher fps would reduce it ?
I'm playing the game with fullRT and my fps are smooth as butter on the RTX4080S. At 4K DLSS performance + FG, very high settings, fullRT I get 85fps in the built-in benchmark, and 70-110fps during gameplay (performance can dip to around 72-75fps during the boss fight in the water and even then game is playable). At 1440p DLSS Quality + FG I even get higher framerate 115fps, but I get much better image quality when I downscale (DLDSR2.25x) 4K to my 1440p monitor, therefore I prefer to run the game at 4K.
I used to see some traversal stutters from time to time (nothing game breaking), but now I don't see them anymore at all (maybe the latest patch or windows update fixed it). The game is a joy to play and it looks stunning in full RT. Of course, I use FG to get perfectly smooth experience, but since DLSS FG works so well, I don't really care. This particular game is more responsive with FG on (48ms with FG on, 60ms without at 67fps base).
The difference between Full RT medium and the game's Cinematic settings is small in terms of performance (on NVIDIA GPU's).
So you can see the whole software RT approach with Lumen kind of doesn't really work well for people with NVIDIA cards.
Only thing i think that the cinematic reflection setting looks better than Full RT at medium.
But the shadows are soooo much better, that i am willing to sacrifice a bit of this reflection clarity.
And probably reflections are still more realistic at RT medium, just not so pretty.
Do AMD cards next
Looking for a 7900XTX optimized settings myself
The game stutters with or without RT on. It has traversal stutters. An iconic problem of UE.
Love the videos Krispy! I have a regular rtx 4080.. do you recommend quality dlss or dlaa at 4k with frame generation? No ray tracing cause of the damn stutters
If I had a 4090, I would use RT, but I have a 4080s, I didn't really have any problems playing without RT. I couldn't really feel anything other than the shadows getting darker.
And the difference between DLSS quality and performance isn't noticeable at 4k.
I'm with you on that. I also have 4080S and have 0 interest in RT. Bought this gpu to be able to play at 4K thanks to the DLSS. 4K HUB Quality preset + dlss quality + frame gen. Solid 100fps with high resolution and graphical settings is much more preferable to me than some unneccessary lights that take %50 of my fps.
don't worry my 4090 gets smoked as well in ray tracing at 4k without FG
@@shuyaku99is frame gen worth the hype?
@@maciekprokop3780 it's pretty good. The only thing is matter is how devs integrate FG into game. Because sometimes it's great, sometimes it should be turned on only in the case of emergency. In BM:W it's like normal, idk
@@maciekprokop3780 if your base framerate is AT LEAST around 45 then yes, worth enabling, otherwise don't bother as the input lag is massive
The recommended specs for ray tracing at ultra according to the creators is 4k at high with the 4080 super and dlss 50% I’m playing that way and it works more than fine
For some reason, I can't get your smooth performance. I have a 4080S and an I714000k and I get MASSIVE frame spikes ranging from 110 all the way down to 70. sometimes drastically dropping performance mid combat. I don't really understand what I'm doing wrong here. 1440p DLSS 50, RT medium, and I am on very high settings. Frustrating when I have a 2800 dollar rig and 800 dollar monitor and I can't even get a smooth experience. ANY help would be greatly appreciated.
Came from the gt 1030 one, oh god this gpu is fast😱😱😱
Crispies ❤
You gotta give your liver to obtain a high end 40 series card to still have to use dlss or frame generation. 😭
1:03 DLAA is not native. What are you talking about?
Yes it is.
@@zWORMzGaming No. No it's not.
True actual performance tests that are scoring a native rasterized resolution rendering do not include the use of any artificial intelligence processed spatial anti-aliasing.
Even some recent titles don't even include DLAA while others force it. Native is native. Any AI software used will make it no longer native.
DLAA is the same as DLSS but uses native resolution alone rather than including a additional upscale process. DLAA most definitely will change the actual image/performance on a native rendered resolution. Or why would it exist?
DLAA algorithm does improve image quality and sometimes at a slight performance hit. It's a AI powered software solution that alters the image before the image is sent to the display.
Not native. Native has no other help.... Ever.
You're wrong.
Hey Kryzzpo!
Love your 4080 Super videos. I own one too. I have a 13700k and 4080 Super. I only get between 85%-97% GPU utilization. Is it because I am running DDR4 ram? This is with most games not just Wukong.
Thanks
ryzen 5090 xtx 256gb gddr9x10
I asked this before on your last video but are you going to Benchmark Final Fantasy 16 PC Demo? This game has high requirement so really curious as to how good or how poorly it runs on below minimum GPUs!
It crawls with every gpu... A literal stutter fest but you can try it for yourself if you want its a free demo
that F ING 4080 super the best all around GPU and its running miserable
Bro forgot about the 4090
@@Atzmn4080 is best all around GPU where 4090 is too much expensive it's basically over priced
@@user-nl2ho9gk3y its really not overpriced at msrp lol
Hello, been watching your videos lately since im planning on buying a new pc but I really cant decide if I should wait for the 5080 or go with the 4080S, since my budget isnt infinite (around 2500euros), and I'm asking this because I want to have the PC connected to a 4K Tv to use it like a "console" for single player games and have it connected to a monitor for when I want to play competitive. what would you and the community recommend? (ps: PLAN TO KEEP THE PC INTACT FOR 5-7 YEARS LIKE MY CURRENT 1080 BUILD)
Great vid 🫡
Literally just got myself a prebuilt with 4080super
Good thing I don’t care about 4k
But moving up to 1440p from 1080p doesn’t sound appealing anymore😅
it would be interesting to see how 1060 or 1070 works in this game with FSR frame generation
It was absolutely not the 4070's fault. anyway i play 4070 on 27 1440p monitor dlss performance frame gen on optimized/quality with ray tracing very high 80/100 frames (1440p dlss performance = 1080p dlss quality)
i watched penguin0 vid of the game he did good the SMOKE intro level is perfect for benchmarking tuning
HELLO does the fps base on gpu or is cpu matter too ?
Ohh when u get a chance test those super cards on ready or not please thanks. write that down on your notebook
Max settings or not that PC should be getting 60+ fps easily at 4k without DLSS or any other BS fake fps
I get stable 60fps+ at 4k cinema maxed very high RT with Frame gen enabled
@@Fiwek23452 frame gen...more fps, more input lag, just another bullshit, a 4080s with a 7950x3d should get easily 60+ fps in native 4k without extra bs like dlss, frame gen and whatever else is out there
most of the time the recommended and minimal PC specs are for Medium/Normal settings. And sometimes going from med to high alone can tackle performance even on high end gpu's , let alone ultra or maximum settings that sometimes are clearly just intended for screenshot at the time the game launch
Thx for the video. It's crazy, but the hair quality in ultra or cinematic makes the flicker shadows. This could be a bug. I tested it with the RTX 4090 in 4K.
Hair quality has nothing to do with it. Shadows are shit in this game without full RT.
@@Reactx7 I tested it. Try it. Set the Hairs down to high and the shadows are quieter.
By the way, the "slider" doesn't really work as a proper slider but more as a mode selector for the selected upscaling method: so for example, when you're going down to "DLSS Quality" area, it doesn't matter if you're at 80 or 67%, you are just selecting DLSS Quality.
TL;DR: the % within the same quality level doesn't mean anything at all, it is just a visual & fancy way of selecting a given upscaler's quality levels.
Hope this helps!
What are u trying to say? If u put it on 80% it literally does scale from only 80% resolution. It says it's DLSS quality at anything above 67 and below 99. But the slider works perfectly fine.
@@shreyass5756 I was trying to explain that the % within the same quality level doesn't mean anything at all, it is just a visual & fancy way of selecting a given upscaler's quality levels.
This is why I hate manual sliders. Just give us the DLSS presets. 🤬
@@Hateroz but that is literally not true. As I said if u select 80% resolution scale at 3840*2160 it scales only from 3072*1728 which is 80% and not 2560*1440 which is 67%. The scaler is doing its job right. It affects from what resolution u want to scale from. It doesn't just default to *quality* regardless.
This is actually easy to test. Just set it to 80 and then 67 percent and if the fps goes up then the slider is doing just fine.
watching from my monitor on 1440p youtube and monitor 1440p but why youtube always look bad quality i mean when u pl;ay this on your own monitor and pc it will blow your mind the graphics and quality right?
It's because RUclips compresses the video and it makes the quality worse than it is in game.
Is it worth disabling some cores to match the 7800x3d if I have a 7900x3d? I see him do this in every video and I’m curious how he does it and how much of a difference it can be with a 7900x3d
So , the optimized is good?
is frametime spikes normal in this game? like stutter
Can't wait to max out the game in 4 years on my 6090 for 4200$
Im waiting for the rx580😅
could you possibly test the 6700xt in black myth wukong?
Spin your staff to repels projectiles attack or homing magic dude lol
now im happy that i get 70 FPS with my 3070 in high at least!
Now you can undertand dark souls and elden ring.
4080 super dlss performance and even then the game cant squeeze better performance... But anyway thank you for the vid!
Atleast we have a new highest pc requirement game right
What overlay are you using? Looks so nice.
MSI afterburner and RTSS :)
Here's my video on it:
ruclips.net/video/GgTGmfwwn9s/видео.html
Test it with a 4090
the cinematic settings in unreal engine is not used for gaming i do not know why the devs put this in the game for the users
no one should use this preset, for gaming use just epic, high, mid or low
Ekceli even Epic or Ultra should not be used in Unreal Engine titles. Cinematic were meant for cinematics only. High should be the first start, and then Very High if you have more to spare. Ultra is reserved for the future GPUs but yeah max visual fidelity and expensive GPUs wouldn't want to miss a thing. It's called graphics FOMO. 🤷♀
start with the 3060ti after you finish the 40 series pls and also test some amd gpus and the intel arc
Isn't 50% balanced, not performance? Quality would be 1440p, balanced 1080p etc.
Nope
where the 4070 ti super?
The challenge is to see if he can beat the game before he benchmarks all the gpus i know i wouldn't be able to 😂
with my 3080 its almost impossible to hit native 2K with high stng and without RT
Are you saying that the imput lag comes from the FG and the rtx?
FG increases input lag
7900 gre or 7900xt please
Depends on your pocket if you can get a 7900xt go for it its better than gre and silmilar to a 4080 super in terms of raster
I dont get it, i have a 4080 super + ryzen 5 7600x and play this game at 1440p with cinematic settings + raytracing on medium
I get around 120 fps max and 90 minimum...how is this bad?
Interesting, I'm getting an RTX 4080S shortly so I'm interested to know if this benchmark was well done.
@Alejandro-hl5zc the guy above has framegen and downscale(dlss) enabled so don't be misinformed
4060ti
4080S, 2024's 2070 equivalent.
Wukong killed my RTX 2080 ti lmao
$1,200 usd just to play at 1080p RT off.
Yeah, people try to cope and set some medium settings with their "optimized" techniques with all the fake frames and resolution downscalers enabled. After that they call it a very well optimized product...
I guess max settings on new games are only for future gpus
people don't understand how sad this is... and it makes no sense developers launch a game that you cant play it even on the best gpu on the market... the world is ending
Can u try a 3070 or 3070 ti ?
I run the game maxed at DLSS P with Max RT on a 4090. Without Frame-gen (which doesn't look great especially with the UI) I can't lock at 60 haha
I wonder how would a 6950 XT stack in this game.
Could you try it with an rx6600?
can you try some budget amd gpus
4050 because im motha truckin NITR0
I think the game is oversharpened and the bloom is too distracting
Respect 🤍🫡
Bruh why my game looks pixelated in my RTX 3060🥴😿