The plaintiff claims the defendant knowingly sold him a lemon, so he’s suing. The defendant insists he sold the car as is, and the damage is not his responsibility.
I've paid less than that and had a great daily driver car it just depends on the car if it's well taken care of I had a Honda Civic 1996 stick shift I paid like $2000. Drove it a couple tears .. then resold it for $1400. If you know a little about cars and resale values... you can.. I used to sell advertising to car dealerships.. I never really did much under the hood of my cars... but when a repair or problem is explained to me I pick it up fairly well.. I've told my grown sons to save their money buy cash cars for 2 to 3 thousand. Going to a dealer often you pay $7000... and the car really is only worth $3000. I'm a women so often dealers assume ladies know less in cars... but it's a value knowing a bit about cars and also not getting ripped off on repairs
@@vivianpatton5692 Of course they do. People are greedy and cheap and they'll think of any excuse they can to justify to get out of a financial responsibility or make outrageous claims in order to collect more money. We're an extremely over litigious society, here in the US. You can use anyone for anything. People literally make careers out of suing others and some will go as far as putting themselves in some seriously risky situations, just to bring on a lawsuit. You also have to remember that by the time these people end up in Court, they've already had plenty of time and opportunities to do the honest and right thing or be able to resolve their issues by civilly coming to an agreement. So typically speaking, at least one of the parties are usually being unreasonable and/or greedy.
I don't agree. The defendant did nothing wrong other than being ignorant of the law regarding smog testing a car within 90 days before the sale. He also offered the guy $300 at the start of the issue. Plaintiff totally dishonest on the tax issue and on his ridiculous lawsuit.
Just hearing the plaintiff say that he is fine with the judgment proves to me beyond the shadow of a doubt that he paid absolutely nothing for the car rental that he was trying to collect. Now that these two have been seen on National Television clearly committing fraud & cheating the "Tax Man" by climbing to pay less than was actually paid for the vehicle, perhaps the "Tax Man" needs to pay these two a visit.
I don't think the plantiff should have won any money back as he was scamming for too much money. He was offered money from the defendent to fix smog problem.. He wanted to sue for more.
I think the reason so many litigants don't answer Judge Milian's questions is that they think they're playing chess and that every move should make their case stronger, not weaker, regardless of what their opponent wants them to do.
They don't answer Judge Milian's question simply because they don't want to incriminate themselves, especially when they know that there is nothing but lies emanating from their mouths. LOL
Yep....where some say Judge Judy would dismiss (maybe rightly so) JMM works a different way to "fish" info, especially to determine a tipping of the scales 🙂
I can't put 4 new tires on my car for $1300, and these people expect to get a car for that. The defendant shoukd have gotten the smog test beforehand. If the check engine light wasn't on then, it might have passed the test. As all of the TV judges tell the plaintiffs, get a mechanic to look at it before ylu buy it.
The tax man is the biggest cheater of all... I have very little remorse for the "tax man"... Too many people out here trying to figure out how to keep the lights on and feed their family. Let alone keep a roof over their head.
The plaintiff is an opportunistic scammer. He wrote on the bill 300$, that is his official proof of the payment, he should have gotten a refund of that amount, and he should have returned the car. The loss of his 1000$ would make him think twice in the future about what amount he writes on an official bill.
The plaintiff seems like a beautiful kind person, but when an adult says “like” 17 times in one sentence it starts to make me seriously question their intelligence 😖
The plaintiff made a complete fool of himself on national tv. Utterly ridiculous to spend $700 to rent a car that could be repaired for $400. And then he had no proof of paying for a rental car. Suing for $4000 for a $400 repair.... a lying thief.
California he got lucky I want to say there’s a few other states like Massachusetts and New York that look out for people buying used cars. Everyone else gets a hurt wallet and a weekend project.
I can't believe that there's people out there that think that they can take a car buy it for $1,000 just over $1,000 and then because there's a $300 Smog Repair they actually think that they can keep the car pay nothing and then also be paid $4,000 on top of it they really think that someone should give them four grand to take their car for free
CA has better consumer protection laws involving used cars but the plaintiff is a scammer and tried to get a bunch of extra money. I get why Judge Milian awarded some money but plaintiff was ridiculous and should have accepted the money from the defendant to get the smog problem fixed and avoided court. Scammer.
It doesn't seem fair that the plaintiff rejected the offer of the 300 from the defendant, tried to cheat via the court and was awarded court costs... Surely it's the plaintiff's fault it came to court, not the defendant's for offering the costs awarded
2:10 I would never do that. The sell price is there for the tax man and to protect yourself. If I were the judge, I would award the plaintiff $300.00 and the car back to the defendant. Teach both of them a lesson.
I like the defendants attitude! He was willing to pay to get it fixed and then said that he still won! Love it! Didn't like the plaintiffs attitude and sneaky ways at all!
Nothing ever takes 10 months to resolve a simple issue like this, plus plaintiff was cheating the state by entering a fake sale amount to avoid appropriate taxes.
HMMMMM NOW THIS IS SOME BS I THOUGHT A USED VEHICLE SELL IS AS IS UNLESS YOU CAN'T REGISTER IT NOT PASSING THE AIMS TEST. I DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING ABT HIM TRYING TO DO THAT I BELIEVE IT'S W/ IN 3~5 DAYS AFTER PURCHASE. SO THEY CHEAT THE TAX MAN SO WALK IN W/ DIRTY HANDS & YOU STILL HELPED SMSD POOR CALL SHE'S JUST AS WRONG FOR ASSISTING
@@Quartzquiz333 please stop letting politics smooth your brain any further. This case was about two litigants from California. A state where you have to have a smog inspection done to an old car you want to sell. It opens up citizens to lawsuits just as this case proves. Its ridiculous. There are countless stories of people leaving California due to it's crazy policies. Ps I'm also not a Republican so don't make this some left right thing.
@@user-vf6ru8gm9p Sigh. When I was a kid we traveled through Florida. It had a lot of bugs and it was hotter than hell. Nothing to do with politics. I don't do echo chamber politics. I try to see people as people.
Milian said she didn't trust what the plaintiff was saying on top of the fact that he purchased an as is used vehicle yet still rendered a judgement in his favor. Black folks don't receive this type of favoritism!
The judge isn't white the bailiff isnt white and neither the plantiff or defendant are white. Stop letting progressive people destroy your brain and learn to think for yourself. The race card is so played out its pathetic.
Do you notice, Adrain, when you're not pulling that cheap attention-getting race card crap that posts can be compelling? You're being your own worst enemy. BTW, please don't lie. As much as you've obviously watched this show I know you've seen cases where Judge Milian has ruled in someone's favor regardless of her opinion of them...and that's for every race!
Развлечения
Plaintiff is a real scammer. Scammed the tax man, and trying to scam the courts. $5000 lawsuit for a $400 repair? Gimme a break.
Oh hush the government cheats millions of ppl out of billions of dollars.
these folks buying a car for $1300 and thinking it's going to be a good daily driver - just insane.
I've paid less than that and had a great daily driver car it just depends on the car if it's well taken care of I had a Honda Civic 1996 stick shift I paid like $2000. Drove it a couple tears .. then resold it for $1400. If you know a little about cars and resale values... you can.. I used to sell advertising to car dealerships.. I never really did much under the hood of my cars... but when a repair or problem is explained to me I pick it up fairly well.. I've told my grown sons to save their money buy cash cars for 2 to 3 thousand. Going to a dealer often you pay $7000... and the car really is only worth $3000. I'm a women so often dealers assume ladies know less in cars... but it's a value knowing a bit about cars and also not getting ripped off on repairs
He "won"...I like the defendant's positive outlook.
Both seller and buyer are shady liars.
I think the majority of the people lie.
@@ANGELSURS Wow , I hope Not .
@@vivianpatton5692 Of course they do. People are greedy and cheap and they'll think of any excuse they can to justify to get out of a financial responsibility or make outrageous claims in order to collect more money. We're an extremely over litigious society, here in the US. You can use anyone for anything. People literally make careers out of suing others and some will go as far as putting themselves in some seriously risky situations, just to bring on a lawsuit. You also have to remember that by the time these people end up in Court, they've already had plenty of time and opportunities to do the honest and right thing or be able to resolve their issues by civilly coming to an agreement. So typically speaking, at least one of the parties are usually being unreasonable and/or greedy.
@@vivianpatton5692 all day
I don't agree. The defendant did nothing wrong other than being ignorant of the law regarding smog testing a car within 90 days before the sale. He also offered the guy $300 at the start of the issue.
Plaintiff totally dishonest on the tax issue and on his ridiculous lawsuit.
An 'as-is' deal is exactly that.
But the law requires the seller to first smog the vehicle and/or make any repairs to the vehicle that allows it to pass smog before selling.
What a fool is the plaintiff….. looking for a payday in court….okay the single parent card was ridiculous…. Shame on him
Once the plaintiff lied about the $350 instead of the $1350 on the BOS his case should have been thrown out!
it's funny I just typed the same thing lol
100%
correct, in this case the judge is skirting the law as well
@@orlandominichiellomakes for good TV lad
Judge Mathis would have dismissed this case with the quickness 😂
when u cheat the tax man and lie in court should be automatic loss
Yeah , cuz we love paying our taxes , Right .
@vivianpatton5692 u do what u want but u don't bring it to court
As is means as is.
Just hearing the plaintiff say that he is fine with the judgment proves to me beyond the shadow of a doubt that he paid absolutely nothing for the car rental that he was trying to collect. Now that these two have been seen on National Television clearly committing fraud & cheating the "Tax Man" by climbing to pay less than was actually paid for the vehicle, perhaps the "Tax Man" needs to pay these two a visit.
I don't think the plantiff should have won any money back as he was scamming for too much money. He was offered money from the defendent to fix smog problem.. He wanted to sue for more.
I think the reason so many litigants don't answer Judge Milian's questions is that they think they're playing chess and that every move should make their case stronger, not weaker, regardless of what their opponent wants them to do.
They don't answer Judge Milian's question simply because they don't want to incriminate themselves, especially when they know that there is nothing but lies emanating from their mouths. LOL
Yep....where some say Judge Judy would dismiss (maybe rightly so) JMM works a different way to "fish" info, especially to determine a tipping of the scales 🙂
Plaintiff is a straight up scammer. Would've served him right to not have gotten anything.
I can't put 4 new tires on my car for $1300, and these people expect to get a car for that. The defendant shoukd have gotten the smog test beforehand. If the check engine light wasn't on then, it might have passed the test. As all of the TV judges tell the plaintiffs, get a mechanic to look at it before ylu buy it.
Plaintiff is one shady liar scamming the tax man lol
He notified the defender 😂😂😂😂
The tax man is the biggest cheater of all... I have very little remorse for the "tax man"... Too many people out here trying to figure out how to keep the lights on and feed their family. Let alone keep a roof over their head.
The plaintiff is an opportunistic scammer. He wrote on the bill 300$, that is his official proof of the payment, he should have gotten a refund of that amount, and he should have returned the car. The loss of his 1000$ would make him think twice in the future about what amount he writes on an official bill.
15 year old car is not a lemon... geesh when will they get this straight
Ching, Ching
Let that cash register rings
What a poet that JM is. LOL.
Love that song .
Defendant was looking around wondering where that mysterious voice was coming from....😂
Lemony fresh
It is my right-handing. That is cute!
Every episode she’s screaming “Im a contracts judge” only to not hold people accountable to a contract they signed 😂 come on people’s court
Except she did
The both feel like they one. One wins by meeting the original expectation. The other wins by not getting busted for being a total scammer. 😅
plaintiff looks like he’s about to terrorize gotham to get batman to reveal his true identity, then go in his mansion to eat raw fish.
The plaintiff seems like a beautiful kind person, but when an adult says “like” 17 times in one sentence it starts to make me seriously question their intelligence 😖
The plaintiff made a complete fool of himself on national tv. Utterly ridiculous to spend $700 to rent a car that could be repaired for $400. And then he had no proof of paying for a rental car. Suing for $4000 for a $400 repair.... a lying thief.
I don't even believe that he paid for a rental. I think that was also a lie. He's shady
Plaintiff deserves NOTHING
Besides the point but looks like both came to court with their shady toupee on
lmao🤣 dude is so nervous, he speaking backwards 2:49
Plantiff shouldn't have been awarded a dime. He lied and schemed throughout the whole case.
California he got lucky I want to say there’s a few other states like Massachusetts and New York that look out for people buying used cars. Everyone else gets a hurt wallet and a weekend project.
2:45 Because the "tax man" and government are so honest.
There goes that "I'm a single parent" excuse.
The plaintiff tried it….
Plaintiff sucks. I know the judge didn’t want to award him anything.
I can't believe that there's people out there that think that they can take a car buy it for $1,000 just over $1,000 and then because there's a $300 Smog Repair they actually think that they can keep the car pay nothing and then also be paid $4,000 on top of it they really think that someone should give them four grand to take their car for free
Plaintiff is a scammer for sure
Scammers
CA has better consumer protection laws involving used cars but the plaintiff is a scammer and tried to get a bunch of extra money. I get why Judge Milian awarded some money but plaintiff was ridiculous and should have accepted the money from the defendant to get the smog problem fixed and avoided court. Scammer.
Damn I have emotional stress just watching these two bickering over a crappy car.
I would not waste my time over 340 bucks smh just fix it man sheesh people are fucking just cheap n dumb at buying cars
WOW he's a scammer. Romanian wins!!!! 🏆🏆🏆
Another example of how you can't cure stupid.
Who else finishes Judge Milian's sentence when she says "Ching Ching Let the Cash Register Ring."? Haha.
I just kind of 🙄when she says it now.
Let's be original..not another used car case.😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Plaintiff is goofy.
The way he said handwriting “writehanding” these Indians
Both are lying through their teeth!!AND DEFINITELY NOT A SINGLE PARENT LMFAO UR LIKE 69 YEARS OLD
Both guys are foolish but plaintiff is a scammer.
I now he tried to scam the guy
It doesn't seem fair that the plaintiff rejected the offer of the 300 from the defendant, tried to cheat via the court and was awarded court costs... Surely it's the plaintiff's fault it came to court, not the defendant's for offering the costs awarded
They both came to court with “Dirty Hands” as Judge Judy would have said. Again it’s Buyer Beware.
No proof on rental?
2:10 I would never do that. The sell price is there for the tax man and to protect yourself. If I were the judge, I would award the plaintiff $300.00 and the car back to the defendant. Teach both of them a lesson.
They are both not bright
Judge Judge would've tossed this case to the side after seeing the price on the paperwork
That elderly man must have been one of those shady fast talking schister type car salesman. He seems like he knows more than he should
I like the defendants attitude! He was willing to pay to get it fixed and then said that he still won! Love it! Didn't like the plaintiffs attitude and sneaky ways at all!
Lol the defendant was right he won
Nothing ever takes 10 months to resolve a simple issue like this, plus plaintiff was cheating the state by entering a fake sale amount to avoid appropriate taxes.
HMMMMM NOW THIS IS SOME BS I THOUGHT A USED VEHICLE SELL IS AS IS UNLESS YOU CAN'T REGISTER IT NOT PASSING THE AIMS TEST. I DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING ABT HIM TRYING TO DO THAT I BELIEVE IT'S W/ IN 3~5 DAYS AFTER PURCHASE. SO THEY CHEAT THE TAX MAN SO WALK IN W/ DIRTY HANDS & YOU STILL HELPED SMSD POOR CALL SHE'S JUST AS WRONG FOR ASSISTING
❤p
California is the craziest state out there.
Schoolkids in Uvalde, TX would disagree.
You misspelled Florida.
@@Quartzquiz333 please stop letting politics smooth your brain any further. This case was about two litigants from California. A state where you have to have a smog inspection done to an old car you want to sell. It opens up citizens to lawsuits just as this case proves. Its ridiculous. There are countless stories of people leaving California due to it's crazy policies. Ps I'm also not a Republican so don't make this some left right thing.
@@user-vf6ru8gm9p Sigh. When I was a kid we traveled through Florida. It had a lot of bugs and it was hotter than hell. Nothing to do with politics. I don't do echo chamber politics. I try to see people as people.
@@Quartzquiz333 what does the ecological makeup of Florida have to do with its policies and people.
January 10th 2017 I had just turned 28 😂 😂 Capricorn Gang
ur in the USA NOW
Duh. What does that even mean?
2nd
Milian said she didn't trust what the plaintiff was saying on top of the fact that he purchased an as is used vehicle yet still rendered a judgement in his favor. Black folks don't receive this type of favoritism!
You had to pull out the race card!
😂😂😂 I love how u get yourself so upset everyday 😂😂😂😂
@@glenncurley680Folks like to use pulling the race card when they can't refute the truth with facts. It's too bad the world is like this.
The judge isn't white the bailiff isnt white and neither the plantiff or defendant are white. Stop letting progressive people destroy your brain and learn to think for yourself. The race card is so played out its pathetic.
Do you notice, Adrain, when you're not pulling that cheap attention-getting race card crap that posts can be compelling? You're being your own worst enemy.
BTW, please don't lie. As much as you've obviously watched this show I know you've seen cases where Judge Milian has ruled in someone's favor regardless of her opinion of them...and that's for every race!
First