The actress honestly was a big part of why this movie will flop. She shouldve just kept her mouth shut but she decided to talk shit during her interviews smh
I don't know when actors/actresses and sportsmen/women started to think that we give a damn about anything they have to say and think it is important or interesting (other than the movie).
"The story was problemtic" What as problemtic, about the original? Its about a Young girl, running away from a abusive woman, who finds happiness in the most unlikly places and by the end of the film finds true love? Im sorry whats wrong with that?
the problem is abusive women do not exist because "believe all women". according to shill media, abusers can only be men and nothing else. all women should be girl bosses and are ready to be CEO of the world the moment they are born. according to shill media they are only being held back by men.
Also cause who framed Roger rabbit was specifically working with toons, this could have had just actual people with dwarfism but for some god knows reason used cgi nightmare fuel
@@kingrippzard2027 there was also no uncanny valley issue with Roger Rabbit because they didn't try to make the toons look real. The dwarfs are supposed to be real and look odd as a result. The toons were supposed to look like toons (and did) and it looked good as a result.
LoL Who Framed Roger Rabbit is 2d characters against live action, not shitty 3d characters *trying* to look real. Roger Rabbit looks infinitely better than this tripe.
Obviously that Disney shill hasn't seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit because if he did then he'd know what it was about and why the live action characters interacted with animated characters.
thats what mentally damaged people do... straw man arguments, and forcing their opinions upon others to imply validity. They often selectively seek obscure data and present it as overwhelming facts in order to override their obvious issue... that they have mental problems that dont align with the advancement of mankind in any productive way
Snow White is a lot older than that. The Grimm brothers collected German folktales that were told time out of mind from generation to generation in their local Germany. They made it their academic mission to record the stories for posterity before they were lost. Culturally all these fairytales/folklore both from the Grimm Brothers and also nursery rhymes are hugely important works and honestly messing with them does a disservice to all of us who value European cultural heritage. Disney have always played fast and loose with the original stories but the current crop are a bloody travesty. See also how they are taking a wrecking ball to Tolkien, one of the greatest writers in the English language (which is a particularly high bar) who’s work is again hugely culturally important to anyone actually from the these islands. Disney don’t seem to care what they are doing. They are intellectually bankrupt
They missed the opportunity to do Snow White and the seven sicarios as Snow White fights against the Snow Queen to reclaim her father's umm, 'kingdom'.
@@8523wsxcso you're saying Half of Americans are Nazi's? Why don't we just get a time machine and have ol Hitlerino see for himself and determine if Half of America are Nazi's
@@joshuaslawson9125 Guess whose policies inspired the Nürnberger Rassegesetze. But you wouldn't know, because 50% of Americans are historical illiterates.
My kids loved the original movie and story line. I recall watching the original movie as a child... Awesome. Thank you Walt! Why try to ruin an awesome, artistic and entertaining film wit a woke BS version. And. That actress should have been coached and constrained in what she should and could say.
Halle Bailey said her version of the Little Mermaid was absolutely necessary for black girls to envision themselves as fantasy characters then turned around and claimed that when she was a little girl, she was inspired by the LIttle Mermaid t swim around her pool and pretend to be Ariel. They could/ve like, not made Little Mermaid live action and just release the cartoon and it would have the same effect Halle Bailey claimed the world needed. By cartoon, I mean the Disney Junior show, only Rachel Zegler and her acolytes would diss an animated classic by calling them "cartoons.
Remaking Snow White with 2024 "sensibilities" was absurd from the beginning. White people=bad so the namesake of the protagonist doesn't make sense. Love for a man=bad so no true love for our protagonist and all the enrichment that can bring to her life. Woman doing domestic labor=bad so let the protagonist mooch off the dwarves and not contribute, that's a likeable quality. Depending on others, especially men=bad so let's make sure the protagonist can girl boss her way to victory somehow. WHAT IS THIS MOVIE AND WHO IS IT FOR?
They fail to realize femininity is strength. Disney thinks turning into a man is strong. Ask any guy out there, from a construction worker to a lawyer to a drug dealer…they’ll all say their mom was strong AF because emotions are a vital part of life. Women give men an understanding of life beyond fixing things and watching football. This film seems to not get any of that and instead makes Snow White somebody completely different than the original. It’s very sad how out of touch Disney is right now
Let's take Little Mermaid as an example.. after limited Ariel HB merch that soon ended in discount bins disney retuned to red haired Ariel threading HB one as limited gimmick, SW remake will have the same fate
The less than 1% of the worlds population who don't have the money to go and watch it but naturally it will be all our fault when it bombs for not going to watch a movie that wasn't made for us.
"Why didn't they cast real dwarf actors?". You can thank Peter Dinkledge for that, he got his rise to fame and pulled up the ladder before anyone else could make it.
@@kateandrova If my memory serves me correct, Disney already had a group of dwarf actors hired for snow white. However, dinkledge came out and said that it would be offensive to cast real dwarf actors. I can't remember his reason (some bs I'm sure). After that Disney took his word over all others for some reason and fired all the actors they had chosen (They didn't want to be offensive). So whether it was his intention or not, he denied 7 dwarf actors a major motion picture role, potentially killing their chance at a big break.
Dear Disney, if the old cartoon is so problematic, and outdated, why did you have to REMAKE that very cartoon, then? Why don't you make a whole new story that's up to 2024 sensitivities? It's like repainting the Monalisa with AI, you bunch of creatively devoid hacks.
The original movie is a watered down and infantilised version of the Germanic folk tale in the first place. Disney has been an abominable blight on European folklore ever since they got into the "fairytale" business. This is a bad remake of a bad remake. It's odd that they expect 21st Century gender politics in a Medieval folktale. If they wish for greater ethnic diversity there is an almost bottomless well of folktales from other cultures outside of Europe. They supposedly want to reach a "global audience" so why not portray their stories. It seems utterly absurd to make a movie about an old European folktale and then call it "old fashioned and too Eurocentric". Disney.... You picked the source material.
@@AshesWake-sf7uwwhy make it if youre not going to do the whole story? Them saying its a waterd down version is just true, whether you think its good or not
Because they love historical revisionism. They want to erase everything that can be viewed as problematic in regards to today's political climate. I'm sure that won't age poorly at all in 50 years.
I mean, the biggest blunder of this movie is to suggest that a queen who looks like Gal Gadot would somehow be envious of Rachel Zegler's beauty and feel threatened by it. Suspension of disbelief can only be stretched so far.
Not only feminine, but gracious and grateful. The 2024 one is entitled and bratty, not to mention detached from reality and hideously unattractive (at all levels).
"Have you not seen Roger Rabbit?" Yes, and that actually looked good because they blended HAND DRAWN 2D animation into the real world with PRACTICAL EFFECTS, brilliantly. Plus, that was an actual good movie with talented actors and crew.
The difference is that the toons in Roger Rabbit were *supposed* to be cartoons. The dwarfs in Snow White are supposed to be as realistic as Snow White herself and they just look neither cartoon nor photo realistic, which is precisely the thing that lands them in Uncanny Valley.
Sorry, it's dated in it's view of women in power? There are only two in the movie - one IS the Queen, the other BECOMES the Queen of the entire country. How much empowerment do they want? "Hello, God, it's Rachel Zegler...."
Yes but one of them needs help from a man one time, so you know, that completely destroys her agency and independence because she needed a man’s help one time in her life.
@@rendezvouzwithramayou must have been brainwashed by the patriarchy. It’s ok, we can recondition you. Just repeat after me- “women are always right”. Now repeat that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Don’t ask questions such as what if two women don’t agree on something, clearly they are both right and just speaking their own truth.
This!!! This pisses me off so much! 😂 “women in roles of power blah blah” hello?!?! She’s the queen! She held the entire kingdom hostage! And she said that as if she invented feminism and it’s never been done before. They don’t just want power. They want people to worship them. We already had strong female characters that everyone loved (Mulan, Moana, the Frozen girls, etc)
Why does something immediately become "bad" if it's more than 20 years old? Isn't art supposed to preserve history? Isn't art not fitting in modern society supposed to be normal?
Messages and cultural things might change with time, but saying that makes it bad is just such a dumb take. Even the propoganda cartoon with donald duck about the nazis is still a good cartoon. Its even a good view on what people thought back in the day. And its animated very well hence why it stands the test of time. People wanting to remove and replace something even if it is problematic is just the opposite of what you should do. Look back on it how different we are now and how much we have grown as society, instead of hiding it and pretending it never happend. Sorry no idea why i went on a rant haha
I wouldn't say art is "supposed" to preserve history. Art is whatever you want it to be. Whether it is completely fictional, a message of it's time or even wishful thinking of what you hope that time would be. If you want to make a new version of a story you are welcome to do it, even the previous snow white movie is an adaptation of a story made before movies where even a thing. Peoples don't have to like your choices though. And they shouldn't be surprise that the peoples that liked the previous story are put off by their choices. And yes, older stuff not fitting modern society is perfectly normal, it is crazy to think otherwise. As if society isn't evolving at all.
"Extremely dated in terms of women being in roles of power." Who had the power in Snow White? A)Dwarves? B)Hunter? C)The queen who orders a hit then uses magic disguises and poison to maintain her beauty in order to perpetuate her p*wer?
it's a great argument but logic doesn't work on socialists because they don't use logic. They just say what they think will win the argument at any moment, it doesn't have anything to do with reality or even what that same socialist said 2 minute earlier.
Day 1: Rachel Zegler to the Prince: "Stop following me!" Prince: "I am not here for you; I am here to take your hot stepmother out for a date." Day 2: Evil Stepmother to Rachel Zegler: "The Prince and I want to have some intimate time. Can you go away and give us some privacy? Go live some dwarves or something."
While you are correct, the current political/philosophical framework through which people engage in criticism requires that there be a clear binary where there is a subjugated and a subjugator. In Marxist critical theory this is the bourgeoisie vs the proletariat. In feminist critical theory this is the women vs the patriarchy. In critical race theory that is :insert minority here: vs “whiteness.” In gay critical theory it is lgbt vs “heteronormativity.” The problem with this framework of critical theory isn’t that these kind of binary struggles don’t exist, it’s that they aren’t the primary or fundamental struggles that critical theorists think they are. As you pointed out, envy is the primary driver of the antagonist, but a critical theorist could never come to that conclusion because it doesn’t represent a power imbalance in a binary system.
I think the people that hijacked the entertainment industry actually take pleasure in corrupting the classics. I think it's a deliberate goal of theirs.
@@lippi2171 it is, the plan is to so utterly destroy everything that those who came before loved so when the young try to look back on better days there aren't any.
Half of Europe is voting right wing, China, Russia, Middleeast, south America ,even the US is thinking Donald trump for president and Disney think that a Woke film will do well, talk about out of touch....😂😂
This film doesn’t even equate to the values of leftists so…who is this movie for, really? 😂 Disney keeps making movie remakes thinking it’ll hit a specific demographic while no one actually wants them
Yea, that got me thinking, Disney does not give a shit about representing minorities, they just care about cash, wich is why they went woke, but now it clearly isn’t good for money due to the political nature of the world.
Box office is just what they care about but it doesn’t prove squat, force awakens was woke garbage and it made a ton of money and got praised by the masses
"Have you not seen Roger Rabbit?" *Critical Drinker briefly pauses to consider whether he will take that question and then moves on* *Gay man obviously bothered* This is the content I come here for.
@@StarboyXL9 so when critical drinker was making his point about cgi (realistic) dwarves singing along with an actual human, he was talking about how ugly it looks and was pointing out that disney should have just hired dwarf actors to play the roles instead. So the man on the right was gonna counter his point saying even roger rabbit had animated characters playing along with humans. Just google "Who framed roger rabbit" if you don't know about the movie and you will understand how braindead the counter point was.
Idk why he even thought that was a good point. Mary poppins had live action and animation way before Roger rabbit and it played well because they didn’t try to dress up the animation as live action. In Snow White it’s as if they were going for photo realistic CGI then gave up half way. So the uncanny valley comment from drinker make a lot of sense. Your brain is less ok with things that look somewhat different versus something starkly different.
Pause at 0:04 seconds... Now, if you didn't know anyone of those people on the screen, you would still have a 99% chance of picking the person representing Disney...
“Have you seen Roger Rabbit” is a straw man if I’ve ever seen it. Roger Rabbit was a labor of love made with pure hand made animation about cartoons and humans living together. This is a remake that wants everything to look real yet ends up looking like ass because instead of just casting real people they chose CGI monstrosities
They probably used cgi because its cheaper than finding rare, real dwarf people that probably will be expensive to find enough. Still I bet they would justify it in saying it would insulting somehow, as if brining any attention to a disability and acknowledging not everyone is the same is politically incorrect
Also they wouldn’t like Roger Rabbit either because they would claim Jessica Rabbit, who is a fictional cartoon character, is being objectified. They would remake Roger Rabbit and turn Jessica Rabbit into a girl boss that don’t need no man.
@@SecureBirch410that’s exactly it. Peter Dinklage criticized them for using dwarf actors because after having made millions himself as a dwarf actor he suddenly thinks it’s demeaning and no other dwarf actors should be allowed to work.
Considering the history of Roger Rabbit's tumultuous production, I'd hesitate to call it a "labor of love." Certainly one of persistence, but one that upset many people and drove a few others crazy.
This is why we hate wokeness. If the movie or show sucks, and we complain, they just say, "U must be a bigot!" It's like having an abusive boyfriend. P.S. Her name is Snow White, because her skin is abnormally pale white. This isn't hard.
More like an abusive Girlfriend. One who emotionally manipulates you,constantly degrades you and the cries fake tears and screams YOU are the abusive one if you try and defend yourself.
if you liked him here in the role of a Disney shill, wait till you see him call Douglas Murray a "cis white male", the reaction is priceless... I think he must be a fascinating person...
To me she seem more like just a spoiled misguided twenty year old kid I'm the same age as her And yet don't pretend to know better than anyone about things i just don't even have a basic understanding of Such as the original story She seem so smug whenever you see her talking And i genuinely hope she gets the wake up call she needs Whether it's losing her job and realising why Or just being told to her face that which she needs to hear by someone she genuinely respects(which i doubt anyone like that exists) I doubt it But i hope for it
So how would you go about this Disney pr team told you mark sure to tell the press that this film is going down a different path it more about her becoming a leader then a love story co star backs her up on that You are they tell the press about the new Film where it going and what going to be about that what she has done. So what would you of done
@@AlexMorgan-ov8sothey know they won’t get it, because it requires submission to your emotional response to a person. Love is deliberately disempowering. Rational people don’t have kids. Sadly, they buy a Darwin Award by doing so. But love will drive you to have kids. It really does show why narcissism is considered demonic in the past.
When the guy says that a story about true love is "problematic", shows a lot not only about society, but also about the family he grew up with. Poor guy. Must've never been loved as a child.
Problematic because the Prince kisses Snow White without her consent. Gee, so instead, he does nothing, she stays in her glass coffin, good dies, evil wins, the end. What an idiot.
True love is a bad idea because it's a non-realistic standard. Believing in true love leads to bad outcomes for people in real life. It's better to assume you will have loved and you'll also have to work for it. There will be ups and downs. Then the one in 10,000 couples who actually do have true love like John basilone and his wife can just accept the fact that they are an unusual situation. But most people are going to have to work at it. And believing that true love is the common case will lead to a lot of old, sad, lonely single people.
Why even make a live action of an old film if you're going to change everything about the original story? Just make something seperate with new characters at that point.
ya know I had the same kinda thought, like wasn't the queen "cute" but not beautiful and that was why she didn't like snow white? Kinda crazy to cast Gal and act like we are sticking to it. It's that social thing we ALL have to do or face ridicule "yas queen you're a 10 as well!" says the 6. BTW I don't give a shit what number I am, I'm not an actor that survives off looks and ego.
"Fair" in the original film could mean beautiful, just, or pale in complexion. Equally true in any case. I always thought that was fun. Now? "Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand, wer ist die Schönste im ganzen Land?" Happy to be corrected by a native speaker, but my understanding is that "Schönste" is unambiguously "most beautiful". Good luck with that.
Yes I agree. Gal Gadot is a 10 and Rachel Ziegler is an eighth at best. Take away the makeup and gal Gadot was a 10 and Rachel Ziegler is maybe a 7. However gal Gadot has pleasant facial expressions both while talking and at rest and has a good smile. Rachel Ziegler's facial mannerisms reduce her attractiveness by another notch. The way she flares her eyes unconsciously makes her look a little crazy and angry.
On the bright side everyone, apparently the daily wire is doing a FAITHFUL live action remake of Snow White that we can all look forward to. That’ll also hopefully help open Disneys eyes to what people actually like and love, but knowing them I doubt it will.
Everybody knows the story of Snow White. If you change the story dramatically, it's NOT Snow White anymore. If you want to tell a different story, write an original story, but Disney is terrible at writing original stories in recent times.
Considering Disney has almost never wrote an actual, original tale outside of their Mickey cartoons, I'd be more concerned if they started trying. Nearly all of their films are folktale adaptations which already disqualifies them from the "original story" title.
@@ForeverLaxxWait what about the movie the Aristocats and lion king? Was that folklore? I loved Disney when I was a kid. I dislike everything they have become now though.
@@DragonHalo99 Aristocats was based off of a book in the 1910s, and The Lion King is literally just Hamlet by Shakespeare. I still think they are good movies, but yeah they weren't original
Roger Rabbit works because there is a clear destinction between real and animated characters - and the animated characters were not horrible "uncanny valley" creations. Also if you want to tell a new story, why not create a godsdamned new one???
They tried to create new ones... Of course, they failed because of bad marketing, awful writting and of course, the arrogance of the actors, directors and producers... Exactly at what happen when they do with a OG series
@@Voldrim359 Actually, Encanto did well, and it's a perfect example of what we're talking about. An original Disney movie about a Hispanic family with a strong female protagonist who doesn't fit the idealized standard of beauty, and a message of not being limited by the lot you're dealt in life. It fits the Disney agenda just fine, but it works because it doesn't ruin a classic. If Disney wants to continue being the Fairy Tale company, they're going to have to accept that fairy tales are not politically correct. They never were. And if that kind of thing bothers you, Snow White and the Seven Dwarves is one of the worst. The title itself references a woman who's beautiful specifically because of the fairness of her skin and a group of people who are outsiders because they're physically distinct from the norm. But you know what? It's just a story. It's not a manifesto. It's not scripture. It's only "problematic" if you think every story has to push a specific moral. If you want to make a Snow White movie and you're still trying to be politically correct, you have 3 choices. 1. Don't make the movie. 2. Make the movie but just tell the story. Accept that it's not going to fit your agenda, and leave out the agenda. 3. Make the movie, push your agenda, and accept the consequences. Disney chose #3. And now we're seeing the consequences.
Looks like it is more pathetic than a Disney shill. Its a Disney wanna-be shill. This garbage thinks he will get an income for this pathetic flailing, and it epitomizes the woke. Huh. You're right mate.
"Vote for an American" yeaaaaaaaaaaa so when will America get rid of the two party system or hell just start going onto a revolution to forbid lobbying because Trump is a rich idiot under whose rule woke Disney was already well ongoing, and Kamala is an American too, she also wont do crap about this. Neither will, because lobbying rules and Disney is king at that stuff@@steelcelt5939
I waited 8:52 minutes for the nuking you mentioned in the videos title. There was no nuking. There wasn't even anything new and therefor interesting in the whole video. Thanks for wasting my time with this clickbait. I won't fall for that one again here :)
Yep. This channel could've included a few decent clips from the debate they keep referring to, but I guess we will just have to play out this so-called "nuking" in our imagination. 😮💨
The whole premise of Who Framed Roger Rabbit is that it takes place in a universe where real people live among cartoon characters. That premise isn’t in Snow White. He picked a horrible example to defend bad cgi.
Not only does Roger Rabbit avoid the uncanny valley by sticking to a cartoon look, but they also put way more forethought into every aspect of filming to make the practical props react to the cartoon action as seamlessly as possible; it wasn't a 5-reshoots-deep figure-it-out-in-post shitshow
1:56 "Have you not seen "Who framed Roger Rabbit?" ... well, there's someone who doesn't understand what the "uncanny valley" is - if Disney had used the 2-D animations from the 1937 movie, it would work out SO much better.
People said the initial animation for Sonic the Hedgehog was terrible. Rather than complain, they redid the entire animation for him for the movie. That movie ended up doing well very and has now started a Sonic the Hedgehog cinematic universe.
@@ErikDaynethose guys who redid sonic are a perfect example of what to do, it feels heartwarming really because they succeeded due to their efforts and because they listened
I know damn well that this goofball did not just try to make a parallel between the magnificence and glory that is "Who framed Roger Rabbit" with the lackluster and universal cringe that is the Snow-white remake😑
@@thomasparsons9866 Or an obese black transwoman in a wheelchair, who got picked on as a kid because she was gay and identified as a goldfish. Slay Queen!😂
She said the movie is dated in its portrayal of women in power...about a movie set in a land ruled by a queen. iirc, the titular character even escapes her abusive mother. How is that dated?
"What about Rodger Rabbit?" 😂 Rodger Rabbit was about humans living with cartoons, that was the point, that was the plot, that was the symbolism. What are the cgi dwarves a symbol of? Of modern computer enhancemments for the lack of talent? Of corpo's unwillingness to hire people because of backwards politics? Of a woman who thinks she's in power but in reality the only thing she can control are imaginary men? 😂
@@YearsOVDecay1 you don’t know the story of Snow White? He’s saying the actress that plays snow is less attractive irl than gal gadot. Which I agree with 100%
It is indeed a fun noun phrase, given that needs, voice, mirror, state and lie can all act as multiple parts of speech. Such ambiguity is far more rare in... pretty much every other language on earth?
I truly love how all companies these days blame the consumer for their trashproduct instead of themselves. You see it happening in games, movies and toys. It's absolutely hilarious.
Lol imagine if that mindset crossed over into the restaurant industry. “Uh excuse me this steak is raw” oh well if you don’t like it why don’t you eat somewhere else! 😂
As someone who is naturally really pale (get called white as a ghost very often) and I have dark hair. I love snow white she is the one that looks the most like me. Now she's being brown washed. The princess that looks the most like my amazing red headed aunt has already been black washed. This is horrendous and I'm sick of it.
nah lmao ur just racist, shit on the movie for its shitness, and shit on rachel zegler for her lack of professionalism but why bring race into it? even blame the casters for casting potentially not the right actress's for the part, but that isn't because of race and will never be. shame!
I feel terribly sorry for you, you shouldn’t have to be subjected to such evil. Snow White named for having skin as white as snow was an inspiration and a hero.
The shill mentioned Who Framed Roger Rabbit, but that movie uses 2d cartoons and has them interact with real objects using robot arms and other stuff which is very well done a technically outstanding for its time. Not to mention the designs don't look nightmarish and uncanny. (also *ahem* uhhh....... mo- sorry.)
“Have you seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” And… “It’s about power!” Those are two quotes that demonstrate everything that is wrong with Disney and their bs products.
She was asserting what the story was about and is right, if you look at the interviews Not dreaming about being Saved by the Prince Becoming the leader she was meant to be He might get his whole lines cut A film that's showing a power rise not love
Love how no one mentions Gal Gadot just sitting through and staring her down with a smile, nodding like "That's good, keep talking. Your career's the one being ruined here, not mine." You know she already was paid for her appearance, she couldn't care less about whether it implodes or not.
@BrettCaton the gay guy never wins any argument on piers's show, I reckon hes just there to be a punching bag for the them, pretty hilarious nonetheless 🤭
I’m convinced the dude on the far right of the panel has some kind of a “prove I’m wrong on tv” fetish Like that’s my only reasoning why someone would be THAT comfortable being wrong
No. . You may not have been alive during the big rise of magicians around the 70s/80s. They most likely were around a bunch of people who never challenged anything they did. Now insert James Randi into the mix. And all of a sudden, someone is actually challenging these people. People en masse saw how phony these magicians were. . Point is, the problem is echo chambers. Social media is the perfect ground for echo chambers. Just delete anyone that doesn't agree with you, or challenges your beliefs in any way... and all of a sudden you are surrounded by people who blindly agree with everything you say and never challenge anything that comes out of your mouth... Pair that with a low IQ, and these people can get some really over inflated egos and misplaced confidence in their nonexistent intelligence. So when they leave those echo chambers, it often looks like this.
Unfortunately they keep afloat by the good work of others James Cameron's Avatar who if you know Cameron Disney would have no say in anything to do with the movie and Deadpool and wolverine which basically took the piss out of Disney, plus all the good marvel before the last woke phase.
They're eating up a lot of their box office losses through creating a subculture of people addicted to their parks & products that they've continuously jacked up prices while decreasing the quality, sadly. I have a sibling who's in his mid-30s where he and his wife use their kids as an excuse to blow the majority of what they save up each year on a trip to disney. Half their clothes, toys, etc. are all disney merch and suffer the similar jacked price for subpar quality. I struggle to find them proper gifts because a lot of what they ask for is disney crap. Any time I visit them, the parks become a forced conversation topic at least once. Many other similar cases & I honestly wish these people had booze or weed as their addiction so at least they'd maybe have a bit more money left over and a better chance for some self-awareness to see the shamefulness of their addiction.
Why would they compare this s*** to who framed Roger rabbit? every single drawing character is 2D which allows for control over how the character looks, whereas in this they are intentionally supposed to look real but they're still trying to cram the original art style into it making it look awful.
It's perfectly fine to dislike Snow White because they cast a POC as Snow White. There is nothing wrong with that and don't let them bully you into thinking otherwise.
They keep saying the movie was made 85 years ago. Well, the actual story THAT 85 year old movie was based on, is actually 400 years old. I would wager a bet that, based solely on the age and longevity of the snow white story, it must resonate with people on a fundamentally human level. If not, it wouldve been forgotten like most stories from that time. The same woke people ranting about how outdated the snow white cartoon/story is, would be furious if they learned that in 400 years, humanity remakes Harry Potter and changes the fundamental elements of the story and its plot because the ideas and situations described in the books/movies are outdated and therefore, ignorant and bad. Just imagine a 10 mile wide comet hit the earth tomorrow. Half the worlds population would be dead within the first week due to starvation caused by a lack of doordash drivers 😱😭
They didn’t use actual dwarf actors because after making millions as a dwarf actor, Peter Dinklage said being a dwarf actor was demeaning, so Disney decided to use CGI dwarves instead.
There's 7 dwarf characters in this film, and only a handful of known-name Hollywood dwarf actors. If they used dwarves then that's a flooding of a small market and the Dink probably wouldn't get a chance to demean himself for megabucks anymore (Warwick Davis' career stalled after PD became the go-to dwarf casting directors wanted).
They don't even actually need real dwarf actors. They could do same thing Lord of the Rings & The Hobbit did to make dwarf characters using prosthetics and camera techniques. If they did it in 22 years ago why can't Disney do it also now? Maybe because director and staff is incompetent.
Dear Disney, if the old cartoon is so problematic, and outdated, why did you have to REMAKE that very cartoon, then? Why don't you make a whole new story that's up to 2024 sensitivities? It's like repainting the Monalisa with AI, you bunch of creatively devoid hacks.
Who framed Roger Rabbit was a masterpiece and the animation blended well with the real actors. And when you look at the BTS you see how much work they put into it
not only that in WFRR the cartoon characters were actually cartoons not meant to emulate real people. So if they looked out of place in the real world setting that was the point as they weren't from the real world
I grew up in Southern California pretty close to period the movie portrayed. In fact my dad used to work on the Red Car along with driving busses. LA had a certain charm back then along with Southern Cal. All gone now.
Zegler: Free Palestine! Neutral Observer: Umm, you do realize they throw 'Alphabet People' from the top of buildings? Zegler: Free Palestine! Neutral Observer: .....................
I doubt any of the children who have been bombed have thrown anyone off anything. You can’t really take the actions of a few individuals and use that as justification for genocide.
@@ErikDayneit’s not the actions of the few little buddy this is a country wide norm😂just like how forcing yourself on a 10 year old is also a country wide norm there🤡
As to the comparison of Disney's reaction to Carrano vs. that to Zegler, it's pretty easy. They fired Carrano because her opinion didn't match that of Disney's shotcallers, Zegler's does. Should they have that right? Yes, they should. Do I like that they exercised it? No, I don't.
I’d like to see a Disney remake of the Fast and the Furious, and have it cross over into the Snow White universe. Street racing dwarfs and Miss White twerking over the bonnet of a tricked out Eclipse 😏
Most media in general has been trash since 2015. I'm very happy that people are standing up to Disney and the rot they produce. Ebert and his 2 movie critic partners in crime would have destroyed these actors and movie choices , possibly worse then Critical and Nerd. Snowflakes everywhere..............
Calling the original movie problematic (no doubt based entirely the romance subplot) shows that Disney doesn’t even know what the message of the original movie or the fairytale it was adapted from was.
In 1937 she was saved by some dwarves and, with the help of the forest animals, she cleans up their house. In 2024 she breaks into someone's house, and then makes them all do the housework while she just bosses people around. _She's now a thoroughly awful person._
![Yeat & Quavo - 5BRAZY [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4XxnTAwyxus/mqdefault.jpg)
They talk about women in roles of power but ignore the fact the villain, the Queen, is in a role of almost absolute power and is a woman.
Exactly!
She is also a woman in STEM as she is pretty good at chemistry.
She’s also more fairer and more beautiful than Ziegler Farquad in every way
@@BoomTribeEntertainment they forgot the snow and the wyte part, didn't they lol
@@rizon72 Alice in Wonderland ring any bells? Lol
The actress honestly was a big part of why this movie will flop. She shouldve just kept her mouth shut but she decided to talk shit during her interviews smh
her and Peter Dinklage basically fucking over 7 actual real life dwarves from having a possible career starting role
The woke think that every word from their mouth is spun gold.
I don't know when actors/actresses and sportsmen/women started to think that we give a damn about anything they have to say and think it is important or interesting (other than the movie).
@@timroberts69 agreed
She is so insufferable smfh
"The story was problemtic" What as problemtic, about the original? Its about a Young girl, running away from a abusive woman, who finds happiness in the most unlikly places and by the end of the film finds true love? Im sorry whats wrong with that?
If I have to guess it is the prince who shows up sees the dead body of Snow and just falls in love, kisses her and then she becomes alive.
the problem is abusive women do not exist because "believe all women". according to shill media, abusers can only be men and nothing else. all women should be girl bosses and are ready to be CEO of the world the moment they are born. according to shill media they are only being held back by men.
It’s problematic because she ended up in a heterosexual relationship which means she wasn’t LGBTQ
I’ve got to admit - I don’t know how this movie is going to end. The trailer is such shite.
Men = bad, white people = bad, women doing anything that's not girl bossing = bad
1:50 The way Critical Drinker pauses for a moment, as he's interrupted by the air-head twink, and then carries on fully ignoring him, is pure class.
And his counter argument is stupid. that movie talked about cartoon discrimination because the looked weird and out of place in the human world.
Also cause who framed Roger rabbit was specifically working with toons, this could have had just actual people with dwarfism but for some god knows reason used cgi nightmare fuel
That a twink.
@@kingrippzard2027 there was also no uncanny valley issue with Roger Rabbit because they didn't try to make the toons look real. The dwarfs are supposed to be real and look odd as a result. The toons were supposed to look like toons (and did) and it looked good as a result.
LoL Who Framed Roger Rabbit is 2d characters against live action, not shitty 3d characters *trying* to look real. Roger Rabbit looks infinitely better than this tripe.
So Disney wont learn their lesson, but will instead keep on blaming the fans
Crazy
Unravel his bullshit, Drinker!🤘
👋
Yea, they got their modern audience. Don't know why they still do that.
surely, it will work this time
Wait … wait … did the guy ACTUALLY say “have you not seen Roger Rabbit?”? Like WHAT?????!?? Roger Rabbit was SUPPOSED to be part cartoon.
My thoughts exactly
Obviously that Disney shill hasn't seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit because if he did then he'd know what it was about and why the live action characters interacted with animated characters.
And is was made in 1988😂
Not 2023
thats what mentally damaged people do... straw man arguments, and forcing their opinions upon others to imply validity. They often selectively seek obscure data and present it as overwhelming facts in order to override their obvious issue... that they have mental problems that dont align with the advancement of mankind in any productive way
and it wasnt uncanny valley at all, it was not trying to make the cartoons look real, it was literally part of the plot
Snow White was a grim tale from 1812. So the story has lasted more than 200 years. Rachel ziegler will not be remembered
Snow White is a lot older than that. The Grimm brothers collected German folktales that were told time out of mind from generation to generation in their local Germany. They made it their academic mission to record the stories for posterity before they were lost. Culturally all these fairytales/folklore both from the Grimm Brothers and also nursery rhymes are hugely important works and honestly messing with them does a disservice to all of us who value European cultural heritage. Disney have always played fast and loose with the original stories but the current crop are a bloody travesty. See also how they are taking a wrecking ball to Tolkien, one of the greatest writers in the English language (which is a particularly high bar) who’s work is again hugely culturally important to anyone actually from the these islands. Disney don’t seem to care what they are doing. They are intellectually bankrupt
So true. I love how ominous that sounds too xD
They missed the opportunity to do Snow White and the seven sicarios as Snow White fights against the Snow Queen to reclaim her father's umm, 'kingdom'.
*tale
She won't even make it 20 years. She's already dated, and "evidently sooo".
Pedro Pascal called half of America Nazis - and Disney did not fire him.
The man attacked the biggest Star Wars RUclipsr and still wasn't fired. They did make him apologize tho
Why would anyone be fired for telling the truth?
@@8523wsxcso you're saying Half of Americans are Nazi's? Why don't we just get a time machine and have ol Hitlerino see for himself and determine if Half of America are Nazi's
@@joshuaslawson9125 Guess whose policies inspired the Nürnberger Rassegesetze. But you wouldn't know, because 50% of Americans are historical illiterates.
@@8523wsxcThe problem is that he’s on the side of the Nazis and refuses to see it.
The lead actress dissing the original classic movie, almost instantly turned me off to both the movie & the actress.
She should drop a diss track! 😅🤣
Should just rename it to muddy snow since she ain’t white
My kids loved the original movie and story line.
I recall watching the original movie as a child... Awesome.
Thank you Walt!
Why try to ruin an awesome, artistic and entertaining film wit a woke BS version.
And.
That actress should have been coached and constrained in what she should and could say.
Seems that the actress' that play these disney princess remakes are always pricks
Halle Bailey said her version of the Little Mermaid was absolutely necessary for black girls to envision themselves as fantasy characters then turned around and claimed that when she was a little girl, she was inspired by the LIttle Mermaid t swim around her pool and pretend to be Ariel.
They could/ve like, not made Little Mermaid live action and just release the cartoon and it would have the same effect Halle Bailey claimed the world needed. By cartoon, I mean the Disney Junior show, only Rachel Zegler and her acolytes would diss an animated classic by calling them "cartoons.
Don't you fucking dare compare this shit to Roger rabbit. Roger fucking rabbit was done with love and hard fucking work
And it was original, I wasn't a cheap rip off from another film.
And the animation in it was drawn in a different style intentionally.
Two completely different concepts. Snow White is supposed to be in a cohesive world. RR was a cartoon world that a human went into.
@@edmundblackaddercoc8522 ? Think what you want about the movie, but it is not a cheap rip off, its a remake and certainly not cheap.
I second your entirely accurate fury!
Remaking Snow White with 2024 "sensibilities" was absurd from the beginning. White people=bad so the namesake of the protagonist doesn't make sense. Love for a man=bad so no true love for our protagonist and all the enrichment that can bring to her life. Woman doing domestic labor=bad so let the protagonist mooch off the dwarves and not contribute, that's a likeable quality. Depending on others, especially men=bad so let's make sure the protagonist can girl boss her way to victory somehow. WHAT IS THIS MOVIE AND WHO IS IT FOR?
It is on brand... Even 1937 was with "1937" sensibilities compared with original
They fail to realize femininity is strength. Disney thinks turning into a man is strong. Ask any guy out there, from a construction worker to a lawyer to a drug dealer…they’ll all say their mom was strong AF because emotions are a vital part of life. Women give men an understanding of life beyond fixing things and watching football. This film seems to not get any of that and instead makes Snow White somebody completely different than the original. It’s very sad how out of touch Disney is right now
Let's take Little Mermaid as an example.. after limited Ariel HB merch that soon ended in discount bins disney retuned to red haired Ariel threading HB one as limited gimmick, SW remake will have the same fate
The less than 1% of the worlds population who don't have the money to go and watch it but naturally it will be all our fault when it bombs for not going to watch a movie that wasn't made for us.
The people that want to lower our population and/or provoke our replacement.
"Why didn't they cast real dwarf actors?". You can thank Peter Dinkledge for that, he got his rise to fame and pulled up the ladder before anyone else could make it.
What do you mean? Did he prevent others from acting?
@@kateandrova If my memory serves me correct, Disney already had a group of dwarf actors hired for snow white. However, dinkledge came out and said that it would be offensive to cast real dwarf actors. I can't remember his reason (some bs I'm sure).
After that Disney took his word over all others for some reason and fired all the actors they had chosen (They didn't want to be offensive). So whether it was his intention or not, he denied 7 dwarf actors a major motion picture role, potentially killing their chance at a big break.
@@everchangingworld11 Thanks for this info. That sucks and my opinion of him has significantly diminished
Guy on the right is an absolute grifter. He just jumps on any topic to promote himself
He's a horrible little twat.
Yea he knows nothing just likes to oppose any logical thinking lo l
That's why he's shilling for Disney. He's devoid of any logic or reason.
I don't hate a lot of people but for this guy I am willing to make an exception.
u can tell by the eyes hes got something not all there, looks like hes on drugs
How anyone could defend the live action remake of Snow White at this point is absurd to me.
paid shills
Ahahahahah very true
I bet he's a paid actor as he's always on Piers Morgan's show playing the contrarian
$$$$
@@Jiren261was thinking the same thing, and i was actually picturing him when Jesse said “people on disney’s side” in the beginning 😂😂😂
Dear Disney, if the old cartoon is so problematic, and outdated, why did you have to REMAKE that very cartoon, then? Why don't you make a whole new story that's up to 2024 sensitivities? It's like repainting the Monalisa with AI, you bunch of creatively devoid hacks.
The original movie is a watered down and infantilised version of the Germanic folk tale in the first place. Disney has been an abominable blight on European folklore ever since they got into the "fairytale" business. This is a bad remake of a bad remake.
It's odd that they expect 21st Century gender politics in a Medieval folktale.
If they wish for greater ethnic diversity there is an almost bottomless well of folktales from other cultures outside of Europe. They supposedly want to reach a "global audience" so why not portray their stories. It seems utterly absurd to make a movie about an old European folktale and then call it "old fashioned and too Eurocentric". Disney.... You picked the source material.
@@Wulfyr Original Snow White is not bad lmao, it's original story is just too dark for showing on TV 💀
@@AshesWake-sf7uwwhy make it if youre not going to do the whole story? Them saying its a waterd down version is just true, whether you think its good or not
@@WulfyrI’d love to see them try to adapt Hans the Hedgehog lmao
Because they love historical revisionism.
They want to erase everything that can be viewed as problematic in regards to today's political climate.
I'm sure that won't age poorly at all in 50 years.
I mean, the biggest blunder of this movie is to suggest that a queen who looks like Gal Gadot would somehow be envious of Rachel Zegler's beauty and feel threatened by it. Suspension of disbelief can only be stretched so far.
Another difference between the 1937 & 2024 versions, is that in 1937 Snow White was feminine.
Another difference is that one is successful and the other won't be.
And likeable 😂
Not only feminine, but gracious and grateful. The 2024 one is entitled and bratty, not to mention detached from reality and hideously unattractive (at all levels).
"Have you not seen Roger Rabbit?"
Yes, and that actually looked good because they blended HAND DRAWN 2D animation into the real world with PRACTICAL EFFECTS, brilliantly. Plus, that was an actual good movie with talented actors and crew.
Perfectly said, bravo.
Chris Lloyd as the villian. 😁
I doubt this guy has seen Roger Rabbit either. Based on his attitude it seems he would probably think Jessica Rabbit’s dress is misogynistic.
The difference is that the toons in Roger Rabbit were *supposed* to be cartoons. The dwarfs in Snow White are supposed to be as realistic as Snow White herself and they just look neither cartoon nor photo realistic, which is precisely the thing that lands them in Uncanny Valley.
@@Teverell hell, even this has been done better in the past. Remember the mask? The difference being, as you said, actual talent being involved
Sorry, it's dated in it's view of women in power? There are only two in the movie - one IS the Queen, the other BECOMES the Queen of the entire country. How much empowerment do they want? "Hello, God, it's Rachel Zegler...."
Yes but one of them needs help from a man one time, so you know, that completely destroys her agency and independence because she needed a man’s help one time in her life.
@@ErikDayne Ah of course. Why didn't see that!
@@rendezvouzwithramayou must have been brainwashed by the patriarchy. It’s ok, we can recondition you. Just repeat after me- “women are always right”. Now repeat that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Don’t ask questions such as what if two women don’t agree on something, clearly they are both right and just speaking their own truth.
This!!! This pisses me off so much! 😂 “women in roles of power blah blah” hello?!?! She’s the queen! She held the entire kingdom hostage! And she said that as if she invented feminism and it’s never been done before. They don’t just want power. They want people to worship them. We already had strong female characters that everyone loved (Mulan, Moana, the Frozen girls, etc)
@@ErikDayne This just proves how secure and confident she truly is.
Why does something immediately become "bad" if it's more than 20 years old? Isn't art supposed to preserve history? Isn't art not fitting in modern society supposed to be normal?
Lets demolish the Piramids coz they are over 20 years old em i right :D?
The worthless generation likes to think everything that predates them is bad.
Messages and cultural things might change with time, but saying that makes it bad is just such a dumb take. Even the propoganda cartoon with donald duck about the nazis is still a good cartoon. Its even a good view on what people thought back in the day. And its animated very well hence why it stands the test of time.
People wanting to remove and replace something even if it is problematic is just the opposite of what you should do. Look back on it how different we are now and how much we have grown as society, instead of hiding it and pretending it never happend.
Sorry no idea why i went on a rant haha
I wouldn't say art is "supposed" to preserve history. Art is whatever you want it to be. Whether it is completely fictional, a message of it's time or even wishful thinking of what you hope that time would be. If you want to make a new version of a story you are welcome to do it, even the previous snow white movie is an adaptation of a story made before movies where even a thing. Peoples don't have to like your choices though.
And they shouldn't be surprise that the peoples that liked the previous story are put off by their choices.
And yes, older stuff not fitting modern society is perfectly normal, it is crazy to think otherwise. As if society isn't evolving at all.
Only stupid people say something is bad if it did not happen in the last 5 years
"Extremely dated in terms of women being in roles of power."
Who had the power in Snow White? A)Dwarves?
B)Hunter?
C)The queen who orders a hit then uses magic disguises and poison to maintain her beauty in order to perpetuate her p*wer?
P*ssy power 😸
it's a great argument but logic doesn't work on socialists because they don't use logic. They just say what they think will win the argument at any moment, it doesn't have anything to do with reality or even what that same socialist said 2 minute earlier.
Why you censored power in the end thou bruh
@@BillyB386 because Disney might sue him.
@BillyB386 disney might have coprwrote the word power, for rings of power. Maybe he is avoiding litigation 😵💫😂😂
Rachel Zegler is the worst Snow White choice, ever.
I guess the new writers skipped over the "With skin as white as snow" part
Ye shes not black , the trailer only failed bcuz she wasnt black duh, silly disney they already figured out what to do to succeed.
Worst actress*
Shes seems very entitled
Should have been Samuel L Jackson.
That gay guy is hired to disagree, he doesn't know anything about anything, he's there as a punching bag for guests, that's his job
Day 1: Rachel Zegler to the Prince: "Stop following me!" Prince: "I am not here for you; I am here to take your hot stepmother out for a date."
Day 2: Evil Stepmother to Rachel Zegler: "The Prince and I want to have some intimate time. Can you go away and give us some privacy? Go live some dwarves or something."
Actually Snow White isn't about love, and it isn't about roles of power, either.
It's about envy and its negative consequences.
It’s also about not judging a book by its cover
While you are correct, the current political/philosophical framework through which people engage in criticism requires that there be a clear binary where there is a subjugated and a subjugator. In Marxist critical theory this is the bourgeoisie vs the proletariat. In feminist critical theory this is the women vs the patriarchy. In critical race theory that is :insert minority here: vs “whiteness.” In gay critical theory it is lgbt vs “heteronormativity.” The problem with this framework of critical theory isn’t that these kind of binary struggles don’t exist, it’s that they aren’t the primary or fundamental struggles that critical theorists think they are. As you pointed out, envy is the primary driver of the antagonist, but a critical theorist could never come to that conclusion because it doesn’t represent a power imbalance in a binary system.
And smashing poontang
Rachel Zegler just seems like a snobby, terrible person in general. I will not be seeing ANY movie with her in it.
Totally agree . Entitled, spoiled, thinks she’s ‘all that.’
Yup, avoid anything she's in. Same with that Amandla Stenberg or whatever from The Acolyte. Both spoiled brats.
same. she has soiled personality imo.
She needs to learn somethings are inside thoughts
Same
"Evil can not create, it can only corrupt that which already existed." The Disney motto for the last 10 years.
I think the people that hijacked the entertainment industry actually take pleasure in corrupting the classics. I think it's a deliberate goal of theirs.
@@lippi2171 it is, the plan is to so utterly destroy everything that those who came before loved so when the young try to look back on better days there aren't any.
@@lippi2171typical brwn behaviour
@@lippi2171
There is a reason why *THEY* never built a long lasting civilizations
💯
Half of Europe is voting right wing, China, Russia, Middleeast, south America ,even the US is thinking Donald trump for president and Disney think that a Woke film will do well, talk about out of touch....😂😂
This film doesn’t even equate to the values of leftists so…who is this movie for, really? 😂
Disney keeps making movie remakes thinking it’ll hit a specific demographic while no one actually wants them
Yea, that got me thinking, Disney does not give a shit about representing minorities, they just care about cash, wich is why they went woke, but now it clearly isn’t good for money due to the political nature of the world.
is voting for the FAR right, which will lead us to another dark period of history.
@@jezlanejl yeah because Barbie didn’t make millions of dollars
@@miyamura_kin9349 ,😂😂 Barbie has nothing to do with Disney...
At the end of the day, the box office will decide who’s right here. This movie will bomb
Very well said
Just like borderlands 🤷♂️
It won't get the chance...
Also South Park's DEI Special. They're saving it just for the SW remake to make their roasting against Bob Iger and Woke Disney that more effective.
Box office is just what they care about but it doesn’t prove squat, force awakens was woke garbage and it made a ton of money and got praised by the masses
"Have you not seen Roger Rabbit?"
*Critical Drinker briefly pauses to consider whether he will take that question and then moves on*
*Gay man obviously bothered*
This is the content I come here for.
I don't get it, mind letting me in on it?
@@StarboyXL9gay dude was trying make a point that wasn't there.......
That's exactly why the drinker just straight up ignored it.
@@StarboyXL9 so when critical drinker was making his point about cgi (realistic) dwarves singing along with an actual human, he was talking about how ugly it looks and was pointing out that disney should have just hired dwarf actors to play the roles instead. So the man on the right was gonna counter his point saying even roger rabbit had animated characters playing along with humans. Just google "Who framed roger rabbit" if you don't know about the movie and you will understand how braindead the counter point was.
Idk why he even thought that was a good point. Mary poppins had live action and animation way before Roger rabbit and it played well because they didn’t try to dress up the animation as live action. In Snow White it’s as if they were going for photo realistic CGI then gave up half way. So the uncanny valley comment from drinker make a lot of sense. Your brain is less ok with things that look somewhat different versus something starkly different.
This guy said Snow White being saved by a man is problematic, one look at Jessica Rabbit’s dress and he would be calling to boycott that too
Pause at 0:04 seconds... Now, if you didn't know anyone of those people on the screen, you would still have a 99% chance of picking the person representing Disney...
BINGO!!! I instantly laughed when I saw him.
3:47 Who turned friendly fire on?
Ahahaha
Lmao
“Have you seen Roger Rabbit” is a straw man if I’ve ever seen it. Roger Rabbit was a labor of love made with pure hand made animation about cartoons and humans living together. This is a remake that wants everything to look real yet ends up looking like ass because instead of just casting real people they chose CGI monstrosities
They probably used cgi because its cheaper than finding rare, real dwarf people that probably will be expensive to find enough. Still I bet they would justify it in saying it would insulting somehow, as if brining any attention to a disability and acknowledging not everyone is the same is politically incorrect
Also they wouldn’t like Roger Rabbit either because they would claim Jessica Rabbit, who is a fictional cartoon character, is being objectified. They would remake Roger Rabbit and turn Jessica Rabbit into a girl boss that don’t need no man.
@@SecureBirch410that’s exactly it. Peter Dinklage criticized them for using dwarf actors because after having made millions himself as a dwarf actor he suddenly thinks it’s demeaning and no other dwarf actors should be allowed to work.
@@ErikDayne the same people that insist 'furries' are a good thing, have issues with a sexy bunny lady? wild
Considering the history of Roger Rabbit's tumultuous production, I'd hesitate to call it a "labor of love." Certainly one of persistence, but one that upset many people and drove a few others crazy.
This is why we hate wokeness. If the movie or show sucks, and we complain, they just say, "U must be a bigot!"
It's like having an abusive boyfriend.
P.S. Her name is Snow White, because her skin is abnormally pale white. This isn't hard.
More like an abusive Girlfriend. One who emotionally manipulates you,constantly degrades you and the cries fake tears and screams YOU are the abusive one if you try and defend yourself.
At this point being a bigot just being right
Anyone who defends wokeness always says “who cares. It’s just a movie and you’re racist.”
That boyfriend bit sounded personal ngl
Wokeness is the embodiment of a mindset that can only strawman and ad-hominem to counter and criticism.
Dude on the right has the mental discernment of someone who stuck their head in a microwave a bit too much.
He looks like it.
You can hear it in his voice... He is a DEI hire 100%.
if you liked him here in the role of a Disney shill, wait till you see him call Douglas Murray a "cis white male", the reaction is priceless...
I think he must be a fascinating person...
Or had too many "heads" stuck in his "microwave," if you know what I mean.
Dude is the epitome of feeling offended for others.
Snow White and the seven dwarfs❌
Coal black and the seven views✅
The more I see Gal and Rachel together, the more I am convinced that Rachel is the evil witch.
To me she seem more like just a spoiled misguided twenty year old kid
I'm the same age as her
And yet don't pretend to know better than anyone about things i just don't even have a basic understanding of
Such as the original story
She seem so smug whenever you see her talking
And i genuinely hope she gets the wake up call she needs
Whether it's losing her job and realising why
Or just being told to her face that which she needs to hear by someone she genuinely respects(which i doubt anyone like that exists)
I doubt it
But i hope for it
It makes sense. True subversion of the story.
@@thepangolinforge She actually seems like someone who could have a successful career as a respected actor. She just needs to tone down the ego.
Rachel doesnt support genocide, so bad as she is she is not pro genocide
So how would you go about this Disney pr team told you mark sure to tell the press that this film is going down a different path it more about her becoming a leader then a love story co star backs her up on that
You are they tell the press about the new
Film where it going and what going to be about that what she has done.
So what would you of done
What is wrong with love? Isn't that what made Disney big? Love was always the main part.
They're trying to raise a bunch of Narcissistic people.
The narcissistic people are clearly already there, and Disney is clearly marketing to that particular demographic now..
Technically, narcissism IS love.
By which, I mean love of themselves and their own image.
That's what I am saying. Why do these women hate romance so much??
The "love" in the Disney company has long since left.
@@AlexMorgan-ov8sothey know they won’t get it, because it requires submission to your emotional response to a person. Love is deliberately disempowering. Rational people don’t have kids. Sadly, they buy a Darwin Award by doing so. But love will drive you to have kids.
It really does show why narcissism is considered demonic in the past.
When the guy says that a story about true love is "problematic", shows a lot not only about society, but also about the family he grew up with.
Poor guy. Must've never been loved as a child.
Unless it was "the wrong love".
Problematic because the Prince kisses Snow White without her consent.
Gee, so instead, he does nothing, she stays in her glass coffin, good dies, evil wins, the end.
What an idiot.
@@verilyheldnever in my life have i seem anyone ask for consent in romance.
Its not how human sexuality works.
True love is a bad idea because it's a non-realistic standard.
Believing in true love leads to bad outcomes for people in real life.
It's better to assume you will have loved and you'll also have to work for it. There will be ups and downs.
Then the one in 10,000 couples who actually do have true love like John basilone and his wife can just accept the fact that they are an unusual situation.
But most people are going to have to work at it. And believing that true love is the common case will lead to a lot of old, sad, lonely single people.
I’m curious what they think about Frozen because this seems to be the same exact ending except it’s a sister that is the “true love” instead of a man.
Why even make a live action of an old film if you're going to change everything about the original story? Just make something seperate with new characters at that point.
I'm stunned by the sheer audacity to expect people to believe that Gal is less "fair" than Racheal😂
It's not even close. Gal Gadot is a 10 And Rachel Ziegler is an eight.
I suspect without makeup gal Gadot is a 10, and Rachel Ziegler is a seven..
Rachel Zeigler is a 6 at most with make up....
ya know I had the same kinda thought, like wasn't the queen "cute" but not beautiful and that was why she didn't like snow white? Kinda crazy to cast Gal and act like we are sticking to it. It's that social thing we ALL have to do or face ridicule "yas queen you're a 10 as well!" says the 6.
BTW I don't give a shit what number I am, I'm not an actor that survives off looks and ego.
im not sure you entirely understand the point of the witch and why she is "pretty"... which is only temporary and the mirror can see beyond it...
"Fair" in the original film could mean beautiful, just, or pale in complexion. Equally true in any case. I always thought that was fun. Now?
"Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand, wer ist die Schönste im ganzen Land?"
Happy to be corrected by a native speaker, but my understanding is that "Schönste" is unambiguously "most beautiful". Good luck with that.
brown snow and 7 vertically challenged cgi character (feminist propaganda included)
Lmao what a description
Now, with 50% more Feminist Propaganda!
@@kerrycunningham7068 lmaoooo
There is no universe wherein Gal Gadot is going to be jealous of Rachel Ziegler’s appearance.
Yes I agree. Gal Gadot is a 10 and Rachel Ziegler is an eighth at best.
Take away the makeup and gal Gadot was a 10 and Rachel Ziegler is maybe a 7.
However gal Gadot has pleasant facial expressions both while talking and at rest and has a good smile.
Rachel Ziegler's facial mannerisms reduce her attractiveness by another notch. The way she flares her eyes unconsciously makes her look a little crazy and angry.
Well, in 1937 the queen was better looking, too. Before taking a potion.
You obviously don't know how a jew behaves
@macmcleod1188 you ranked a jew as a 10? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I can only imagine what life is like, living as a simpleton. 😂
@@deeem2628 you must be married to a goat if you think Godot isnt a 10
On the bright side everyone, apparently the daily wire is doing a FAITHFUL live action remake of Snow White that we can all look forward to. That’ll also hopefully help open Disneys eyes to what people actually like and love, but knowing them I doubt it will.
5:35 The antagonist is literally a woman in a role of power
Lmao, Disney has no real good excuse. As it was said, a bad movie is a bad movie. 😂
Apparently logic is the real villain in the remake
Woke Disney is a big no no to my children
Define 'woke'?
@@Loganwolfen you know well....
@@Loganwolfenpushing an agenda
@@Loganwolfenis delusional a good start?
Agreed! Everything woke turns to crap.
Everybody knows the story of Snow White. If you change the story dramatically, it's NOT Snow White anymore. If you want to tell a different story, write an original story, but Disney is terrible at writing original stories in recent times.
Disney write an _original_ story instead appropriating an existing one? *But that would take work!* /s 😂
Considering Disney has almost never wrote an actual, original tale outside of their Mickey cartoons, I'd be more concerned if they started trying. Nearly all of their films are folktale adaptations which already disqualifies them from the "original story" title.
@@ForeverLaxxWait what about the movie the Aristocats and lion king? Was that folklore? I loved Disney when I was a kid. I dislike everything they have become now though.
@@DragonHalo99 Aristocats was original, but Lion King was from Hamlet.
@@DragonHalo99 Aristocats was based off of a book in the 1910s, and The Lion King is literally just Hamlet by Shakespeare. I still think they are good movies, but yeah they weren't original
I vow to never watch anything that has Rachel anywhere in it.
Roger Rabbit works because there is a clear destinction between real and animated characters - and the animated characters were not horrible "uncanny valley" creations.
Also if you want to tell a new story, why not create a godsdamned new one???
Exactly it’s not a live action remake it’s a blend
@@thejessegrant Plus WFRR is decades old!!
Also it had amazing practical effects involving water and guns.
They tried to create new ones... Of course, they failed because of bad marketing, awful writting and of course, the arrogance of the actors, directors and producers... Exactly at what happen when they do with a OG series
@@Voldrim359 Actually, Encanto did well, and it's a perfect example of what we're talking about. An original Disney movie about a Hispanic family with a strong female protagonist who doesn't fit the idealized standard of beauty, and a message of not being limited by the lot you're dealt in life. It fits the Disney agenda just fine, but it works because it doesn't ruin a classic.
If Disney wants to continue being the Fairy Tale company, they're going to have to accept that fairy tales are not politically correct. They never were.
And if that kind of thing bothers you, Snow White and the Seven Dwarves is one of the worst. The title itself references a woman who's beautiful specifically because of the fairness of her skin and a group of people who are outsiders because they're physically distinct from the norm. But you know what? It's just a story. It's not a manifesto. It's not scripture. It's only "problematic" if you think every story has to push a specific moral.
If you want to make a Snow White movie and you're still trying to be politically correct, you have 3 choices.
1. Don't make the movie.
2. Make the movie but just tell the story. Accept that it's not going to fit your agenda, and leave out the agenda.
3. Make the movie, push your agenda, and accept the consequences.
Disney chose #3. And now we're seeing the consequences.
the disney shill looks EXACTLY like everyone thought they/them would look
Looks like it is more pathetic than a Disney shill. Its a Disney wanna-be shill. This garbage thinks he will get an income for this pathetic flailing, and it epitomizes the woke. Huh. You're right mate.
Dave chapelle made a good explanation why gay people are so mean. It's hilarious because it's so right.
Lol they them
Yeah,he does. I was,for years,indifferent toward fruit. No longer.
Vote for an American in the upcoming election - or there will be fruit everywhere.
"Vote for an American" yeaaaaaaaaaaa so when will America get rid of the two party system or hell just start going onto a revolution to forbid lobbying because Trump is a rich idiot under whose rule woke Disney was already well ongoing, and Kamala is an American too, she also wont do crap about this.
Neither will, because lobbying rules and Disney is king at that stuff@@steelcelt5939
I waited 8:52 minutes for the nuking you mentioned in the videos title. There was no nuking. There wasn't even anything new and therefor interesting in the whole video. Thanks for wasting my time with this clickbait. I won't fall for that one again here :)
Yes, what this person said!
Exactly
Yep. This channel could've included a few decent clips from the debate they keep referring to, but I guess we will just have to play out this so-called "nuking" in our imagination. 😮💨
Yeah disliked for sure
Womp womp
WE as the Public decide what is appealing and Good, not some PR marketing machine
The whole premise of Who Framed Roger Rabbit is that it takes place in a universe where real people live among cartoon characters. That premise isn’t in Snow White. He picked a horrible example to defend bad cgi.
His desperate grasp for a strawman didn't leave him any time to actually think it through.
Not only does Roger Rabbit avoid the uncanny valley by sticking to a cartoon look, but they also put way more forethought into every aspect of filming to make the practical props react to the cartoon action as seamlessly as possible; it wasn't a 5-reshoots-deep figure-it-out-in-post shitshow
1:56 "Have you not seen "Who framed Roger Rabbit?" ... well, there's someone who doesn't understand what the "uncanny valley" is - if Disney had used the 2-D animations from the 1937 movie, it would work out SO much better.
People said the initial animation for Sonic the Hedgehog was terrible. Rather than complain, they redid the entire animation for him for the movie. That movie ended up doing well very and has now started a Sonic the Hedgehog cinematic universe.
@@ErikDaynethose guys who redid sonic are a perfect example of what to do, it feels heartwarming really because they succeeded due to their efforts and because they listened
I know damn well that this goofball did not just try to make a parallel between the magnificence and glory that is "Who framed Roger Rabbit" with the lackluster and universal cringe that is the Snow-white remake😑
Thank you, was about to comment the same thing.
This bitch really tried to compare those 2.
The guy on the right have this "serial killer"-smile all throughout the interview xD
He's just angry he wasnt cast as Snowwhite.
"that's the I'm right you're wrong" smile.
He IS gay
But Not Classic pre2010 chill gay
He IS 2020 lgbtq gay and those people are A danger to society
@@jjbeloni7818I’ll be honest, replacing the Queen and Snow White with gay white men would be a funny watch at the very least.
@@thomasparsons9866 Or an obese black transwoman in a wheelchair, who got picked on as a kid because she was gay and identified as a goldfish. Slay Queen!😂
She said the movie is dated in its portrayal of women in power...about a movie set in a land ruled by a queen. iirc, the titular character even escapes her abusive mother. How is that dated?
4:23 "It's about power"
I dont care about love, I care about POWER!
-Totally not something Sauron would say.
She even has a bit of that Jafar expression when she says it..
Or Hitler
She wants to be a leader. A single, middle aged, leader of cats. Seven cats
I think you mean the evil queen 😂
If you're arguing with millions of your potential customers that they're bad people because they don't like your product, you've already lost.
"What about Rodger Rabbit?" 😂
Rodger Rabbit was about humans living with cartoons, that was the point, that was the plot, that was the symbolism. What are the cgi dwarves a symbol of? Of modern computer enhancemments for the lack of talent? Of corpo's unwillingness to hire people because of backwards politics? Of a woman who thinks she's in power but in reality the only thing she can control are imaginary men? 😂
Excellent commentary on the topic and on the interview. Well done, well said.
Disney 2024 tries to convice us that Zeglar is more beautiful than Gal Gadot , hilarious.. and even worse, Zeglar has shi*ty personality
I feel bad for whoever needs to voice the mirror to state that lie, not even an AI generated voice would do that without cringing
Yes, she’s the UNfairest of them all.
@@Salieri01"... whoever needs to voice the mirror to state that lie .."
??
What does that even mean??
@@YearsOVDecay1 you don’t know the story of Snow White? He’s saying the actress that plays snow is less attractive irl than gal gadot. Which I agree with 100%
It is indeed a fun noun phrase, given that needs, voice, mirror, state and lie can all act as multiple parts of speech. Such ambiguity is far more rare in... pretty much every other language on earth?
I truly love how all companies these days blame the consumer for their trashproduct instead of themselves. You see it happening in games, movies and toys. It's absolutely hilarious.
Lol imagine if that mindset crossed over into the restaurant industry. “Uh excuse me this steak is raw” oh well if you don’t like it why don’t you eat somewhere else! 😂
Only the Yt consumers tho. Exclusively the Yt consumer and no one else particularly the men.
Lack of accountability is one of the main themes of western culture these days. It's like millions of spoiled kids trapped in adult bodies.
@@TheBestEverEverEver exactly! They always blame white men lol
@@ErikDayne that would be hilarious tbh and the restaurant would be bankrupt in days
As someone who is naturally really pale (get called white as a ghost very often) and I have dark hair. I love snow white she is the one that looks the most like me. Now she's being brown washed.
The princess that looks the most like my amazing red headed aunt has already been black washed.
This is horrendous and I'm sick of it.
nah lmao ur just racist, shit on the movie for its shitness, and shit on rachel zegler for her lack of professionalism but why bring race into it? even blame the casters for casting potentially not the right actress's for the part, but that isn't because of race and will never be. shame!
I feel terribly sorry for you, you shouldn’t have to be subjected to such evil. Snow White named for having skin as white as snow was an inspiration and a hero.
@@WavyYuhDig No need to apologize, it's just sad to see "straight white American" hating being main stream.
The shill mentioned Who Framed Roger Rabbit, but that movie uses 2d cartoons and has them interact with real objects using robot arms and other stuff which is very well done a technically outstanding for its time. Not to mention the designs don't look nightmarish and uncanny. (also *ahem* uhhh....... mo- sorry.)
“Have you seen Who Framed Roger Rabbit?”
And…
“It’s about power!”
Those are two quotes that demonstrate everything that is wrong with Disney and their bs products.
I had to rewind back after she saied that. completely out of the blue. like that was crazy.
She was asserting what the story was about and is right, if you look at the interviews
Not dreaming about being Saved by the Prince
Becoming the leader she was meant to be
He might get his whole lines cut
A film that's showing a power rise not love
"It's about power!"
Kind of like doing everything you can to undermine western culture is about power?
Love how no one mentions Gal Gadot just sitting through and staring her down with a smile, nodding like "That's good, keep talking. Your career's the one being ruined here, not mine." You know she already was paid for her appearance, she couldn't care less about whether it implodes or not.
Actually she's having screaming fits because her singing wasn't featured at D23. She's a whole different train crash.
The Disney Rep's face went absolutely rigid when they were talking about Rachel Zegler's antisemitic rant.
Kinda thought she was semitic herself.
Also weird noone notices anti white rants.
James doesn’t “represent” anyone except himself!
@BrettCaton the gay guy never wins any argument on piers's show, I reckon hes just there to be a punching bag for the them, pretty hilarious nonetheless 🤭
@@BettaUzeYoNikez.. indeed.. remember that time when Douglas Murray publicly humiliated him? 😂
@@HarryFlashmanVC how could I forget 🤣🤣
8:22 they have t sued her BECAUSE THEY AGREE WITH HER!!!
No matter how you paint it, Zegler is just the worst.
they keep talking about women in power, im sorry ? but who the hell was in charge of a kingdom? its sure as hell wasnt the prince.
I think we’ve had TOO MUCH wAhmen in power
I’m convinced the dude on the far right of the panel has some kind of a “prove I’m wrong on tv” fetish
Like that’s my only reasoning why someone would be THAT comfortable being wrong
No.
.
You may not have been alive during the big rise of magicians around the 70s/80s. They most likely were around a bunch of people who never challenged anything they did. Now insert James Randi into the mix. And all of a sudden, someone is actually challenging these people. People en masse saw how phony these magicians were.
.
Point is, the problem is echo chambers. Social media is the perfect ground for echo chambers. Just delete anyone that doesn't agree with you, or challenges your beliefs in any way... and all of a sudden you are surrounded by people who blindly agree with everything you say and never challenge anything that comes out of your mouth... Pair that with a low IQ, and these people can get some really over inflated egos and misplaced confidence in their nonexistent intelligence. So when they leave those echo chambers, it often looks like this.
Annoying bundle of sticks
My political stance: The Power, of the Vampire, Is That Man, Will Not Believe.
Never change Disney...that way, your DOOM comes that muck quicker!!! This movie is going to CRATER!!! 🙌🏾
Disney will never learn, in the end it will lead to their destruction
Agree 100% BUT its gonna be several more years before we see this
Disney etc still being backed by Blackrock, Vanguard etc
Unfortunately they keep afloat by the good work of others James Cameron's Avatar who if you know Cameron Disney would have no say in anything to do with the movie and Deadpool and wolverine which basically took the piss out of Disney, plus all the good marvel before the last woke phase.
Please good let Disney go away within the next ten years
@@Sillysillylittleman dont forget about inside out 2 or encanto
They're eating up a lot of their box office losses through creating a subculture of people addicted to their parks & products that they've continuously jacked up prices while decreasing the quality, sadly.
I have a sibling who's in his mid-30s where he and his wife use their kids as an excuse to blow the majority of what they save up each year on a trip to disney. Half their clothes, toys, etc. are all disney merch and suffer the similar jacked price for subpar quality. I struggle to find them proper gifts because a lot of what they ask for is disney crap. Any time I visit them, the parks become a forced conversation topic at least once. Many other similar cases & I honestly wish these people had booze or weed as their addiction so at least they'd maybe have a bit more money left over and a better chance for some self-awareness to see the shamefulness of their addiction.
Lol that gay guy never wins any arguments they put him in, hes literally a punching bag for piers's show
Good
Why would they compare this s*** to who framed Roger rabbit? every single drawing character is 2D which allows for control over how the character looks, whereas in this they are intentionally supposed to look real but they're still trying to cram the original art style into it making it look awful.
Poor guy from Disney ... If the story is problematic, why remake the story at all. Just do a novel modern fairy tale.
He’s not from Disney, he’s a liberal pundit that’s on his show a lot and is basically the LGBT representation
" the movie is problematic " then don't make a live action of a problematic movie
It's perfectly fine to dislike Snow White because they cast a POC as Snow White. There is nothing wrong with that and don't let them bully you into thinking otherwise.
They keep saying the movie was made 85 years ago. Well, the actual story THAT 85 year old movie was based on, is actually 400 years old. I would wager a bet that, based solely on the age and longevity of the snow white story, it must resonate with people on a fundamentally human level. If not, it wouldve been forgotten like most stories from that time. The same woke people ranting about how outdated the snow white cartoon/story is, would be furious if they learned that in 400 years, humanity remakes Harry Potter and changes the fundamental elements of the story and its plot because the ideas and situations described in the books/movies are outdated and therefore, ignorant and bad. Just imagine a 10 mile wide comet hit the earth tomorrow. Half the worlds population would be dead within the first week due to starvation caused by a lack of doordash drivers 😱😭
Rachel is THE worst. 🤮
They didn’t use actual dwarf actors because after making millions as a dwarf actor, Peter Dinklage said being a dwarf actor was demeaning, so Disney decided to use CGI dwarves instead.
I bet he's finding all those 0000's in his bank account 'demeaning'
And they could have used other actors. They could have given the actors the choice.
Yeh Dinklage kicking the ladder away for other dwarf actors after gaining fame and making huge amounts of money himself.
There's 7 dwarf characters in this film, and only a handful of known-name Hollywood dwarf actors. If they used dwarves then that's a flooding of a small market and the Dink probably wouldn't get a chance to demean himself for megabucks anymore (Warwick Davis' career stalled after PD became the go-to dwarf casting directors wanted).
They don't even actually need real dwarf actors. They could do same thing Lord of the Rings & The Hobbit did to make dwarf characters using prosthetics and camera techniques. If they did it in 22 years ago why can't Disney do it also now? Maybe because director and staff is incompetent.
Dear Disney, if the old cartoon is so problematic, and outdated, why did you have to REMAKE that very cartoon, then? Why don't you make a whole new story that's up to 2024 sensitivities? It's like repainting the Monalisa with AI, you bunch of creatively devoid hacks.
So they can add their propaganda to the film. Because the communist has zero creativity and only take from the past to destroy it.
You copy-pasted this comment from someone else that posted it six hours ago 🤡
@@HaythamThorn
Thanks. I almost gave it a thumbs up.
@@finsfan90 No problem, I hate when people do this. @do00 is the person that the comment was stolen from.
@@HaythamThorn
Who cares? Upvotes do nothing but stroke weird peoples egos.
I did not see this comment until here so it works for me.
I love how fucking annoying the pro Disney guy and tries to interrupt CD's turn on explaining his opinion.
Who framed Roger Rabbit was a masterpiece and the animation blended well with the real actors.
And when you look at the BTS you see how much work they put into it
Exactly
not only that in WFRR the cartoon characters were actually cartoons not meant to emulate real people. So if they looked out of place in the real world setting that was the point as they weren't from the real world
I grew up in Southern California pretty close to period the movie portrayed. In fact my dad used to work on the Red Car along with driving busses. LA had a certain charm back then along with Southern Cal. All gone now.
Zegler: Free Palestine!
Neutral Observer: Umm, you do realize they throw 'Alphabet People' from the top of buildings?
Zegler: Free Palestine!
Neutral Observer: .....................
I dont agree with homosexuality but i definitely disagree with throwing people off rooftops.
and have actual patriarchy
I doubt any of the children who have been bombed have thrown anyone off anything. You can’t really take the actions of a few individuals and use that as justification for genocide.
@@ErikDayneit’s not the actions of the few little buddy this is a country wide norm😂just like how forcing yourself on a 10 year old is also a country wide norm there🤡
@@ErikDayneehm they belief they get ethernal bliss when they sacrifice themself for their religion.
Bad movie is bad movie. Good movie is good movie. We want entertainment not political view
As to the comparison of Disney's reaction to Carrano vs. that to Zegler, it's pretty easy. They fired Carrano because her opinion didn't match that of Disney's shotcallers, Zegler's does. Should they have that right? Yes, they should. Do I like that they exercised it? No, I don't.
A huge part of learning is accepting your mistake, disney/Hollywood will never accept
They will because both are sinking…
@@robnzombiz what? do you mean once their bankrupt they will finally accept
What i like about engineering. Its a mistake driven field
Learning means you care about getting it right. They don’t care about the stories they’re telling they care about cranking out content.
These schmucks wanna keep their parasitic jobs. You want them to admit responsibility or face reality? THAT is (sold) Disneyland my friend.
I’d like to see a Disney remake of the Fast and the Furious, and have it cross over into the Snow White universe. Street racing dwarfs and Miss White twerking over the bonnet of a tricked out Eclipse 😏
You joke but that might make some of its money back. 😉
Just switch the roles. Let Gal Gadot be snow white.
😂😂
but when zegler looks into the mirror and asks "Who's the fairest of them all" the mirror would just laugh back at her!
@@Freddie-Z-Geek4Ever More likely it will shatter, because of her mediocre looks and horrible personality
Most media in general has been trash since 2015. I'm very happy that people are standing up to Disney and the rot they produce. Ebert and his 2 movie critic partners in crime would have destroyed these actors and movie choices , possibly worse then Critical and Nerd. Snowflakes everywhere..............
Calling the original movie problematic (no doubt based entirely the romance subplot) shows that Disney doesn’t even know what the message of the original movie or the fairytale it was adapted from was.
I'm not really sure what the hell Disney was thinking: Gal Gadot is so much hotter than Rachel Zegler. Even her name is hotter.
Wayyyy too jewy
What Disney has done is the equivalence of making a James Bond movie with a black woman as 007.
Dont give em any ideas
Snow White a leader? Of what?
Did you guys hear Rachel going around telling folks that she is "hotter' than Gal Gadot😂😂😂😂😂 Delulu-land😂😂😂
_Denial is not just a river in Egypt._ 😂
In 1937 she was saved by some dwarves and, with the help of the forest animals, she cleans up their house.
In 2024 she breaks into someone's house, and then makes them all do the housework while she just bosses people around.
_She's now a thoroughly awful person._
Why is it so hard for woke actresses to say thank you?
Even nikocado avocado comeback is worth more looking into than this Disney wokeness...