Yo dudes!! Just to let you know I've released a few presets specifically for RAWs from the Samsung S22 line, it's available at the top link in the description if you're interested :)
When Big RUclipsrs are Trying to show the S22U cam inferior to the iPhone, small youtubers are doing excellent job showcasing the power of its lenses. Great job mate. 👏
@Avishar I had iPhone for last 10 years, even though cameras are truly amazing, zoom capabilities of my S22U make it much more preferable when taking pictures. A minor difference in picture quality can be overlooked, but a huge difference in zoom capabilities are just making S22U much more useful.
If you still have the S22 Ultra, you should revisit this comparison. As part of the late August/early September update, there's been a significant update to how the cameras process images. The images now look even more comparable to DSLR, especially when in 108MP camera with "Detail Enhancer" enabled.
As someone who had Iphone as go-to phone laste 10years I have S22U one now and I am blown away by this phone in general, better experience then I had in any Iphone, camera wise its next lvl compared to anything we have on market, for me highest quilty feature is portrait video, it looks like a movie, you can literally take HD moon photos, the one you saying is not used so much, Id find it usefull only when taking photos with large group of people in it, otherwise i prefer standard 3:4
Personally, it's easy to distinguish which photos the phone takes with the oversharpening compared to the softer look that cameras produce. But still, S22 Ultra is an amazing camera no doubt! ❤️
It's very interesting to see how good mobile cameras has improved over the years. I recently ordered a S22 ultra, just to play around. I thought if this is that good, i might as well just have it. Gonna play around with landscape photography and low light shots at night. But gonna use tribod if the light is way too low.
@@devsunny10 I've been testing the phone a lot and are very happy with the results of the RAW photos. But i still going back to my system camera for better quality photos. But the S22 Ultra has certainly changed what i have with me. I don't carry compact cameras which can take RAW photos any longer, since the S22 Ultra has replaced it for me at least.
I have the S21, S23 and S24 Ultra. They are nothing compared to the dedicated camera. In fact, after4 taking the picture with any of this models, the pictures get distorted because the software is trying to refine the photo and you cant even turn it off. This is a known issue with Samsung ultra phones. And don't forget that the 200 megapixel is enlarged by the software. The sensor in the camera is much much smaller. This is how Samsung cheats and lie to people. This issues are in Pro mode as well. This is true. Anyone who wants to buy Samsung for the camera, do your research. The camera is good only for day to day photography.
Hey guys! So sorry there's an edit error at 7:18, but if you continue on there's a lightroom breakdown which goes through the differences in this shot in detail! Lots of shots to keep track of 😎
Yes I do actually agree with you - I think if I was shooting portraits properly (of a model etc) the portrait shots would come out better, which is why I included another portrait mode shot. Portraits of yourself are hard and I'll bear this in mind next time!
It would be interesting to see RAW shots between the two. You could then match the S22 and the EOS camera settings and apply the same filtering in Lightroom. Most users won't be shooting RAW, but a lot of users won't add any color correction to their DSLR shots either. Overall, great comparison to see!
My thoughts as well. Some of the Canon shots didn't look colour corrected enough. I felt this because I use an R6 and Pixel. Pixel definitely has great computational photography and portrait shots are very pleasing too. And for social media, I could do with Pixel JPEGs in certain scenarios. Definitely not for Prints, I mean, I can, but it wouldn't be anything like the R6 (or even enough to compare with my old 700D). Samsung oversharpens and saturates a bit more. Since we cannot undo that without losing detail, For the R6, Lifting the shadows and using masked sharpening to give a more comparable image would be better. These days people don't buy mirrorless to shoot JPEGs.
Most people who shoot with DSLRs shoot in RAW, shooting in JPG is like buying a Ferrari, but only driving in first gear. A mobile is not even comparable to a good DSLR camera. Of course, straight out of the camera, on a TV screen, a mobile photo can look better. But if you are knowledgeable, and know how lightroom works. So the result will be considerably much better with a DSLR.
Looks like you had an editing problem at 7:21 but great comparison, crazy how good the phone cameras have improved last few years. I upgraded to S22 ultra from Note10 Plus and am pretty happy with it.
I feel like in all Samsung pictures the colors are really saturated making every object look separated (almost like there is a black line around every object looking like draw) while the Pro cam makes the colors softer and making everything looks in blended and realistic.
You should not be so impressed.... He compares a HIGHLY processed S22 photo to a alomst zero processed R6 photo. If you process the R6 photo equal to the S22 it will be way better (btw. It´s an EF Lens, adapted to the R6 - it´s not an RF lens, made for the R6 and even if you take that into account it seems he own a very very bad (soft) lens. Send me a RAW shot of the R6 and you will see, whats possible... The only reason to prefer the S22 is that you have a lot less work to do.
@@Peter_Cetera been fotographing with it for a while now, and even though it still isn't as good as professional camera's, it is still impressive that a phone is capable of doing stuff like this
For statics objects and good light Im use the 108MP in many cases but I have to say, the portrait take great pictures. I sell photos and for 2 and a half years I have only used my phone, 1st because in 4"x7" photos up to 2'x3' posters there are no differences in quality, if there are certain details that most people will not notice. And 2nd, it is more challenging to be able to get the shot you want because of the limitations of the phone in terms of cameras but...the rain is not an obstacle, nor the sea, nor the rivers because it is waterproof....obviously, camera is camera but for small jobs it's great. And I have to said....great video!!!
It's all equal when looking on a screen. Take it for print, then you'll notice the difference. Can't substitute sensor size and the amount of light it takes in.
I really love watching smartphone camera systems evolve over time and get better and better vs. pro cameras, and you also do such a great job to compare the cameras against each other.
I think the s22 is adding sharpening and clarity witch gives It a compressed crunchy look where the r6 looks very nice. At night the s22 will beat out the r6 because it does up the exposure in phone and such but when editing you'll notice the dynamic range in a raw file from the r6 is mutch better. The phone can probably beat out some entry level crop censor cameras but it can't beat a full frame uncompressed raw file from these newer cameras like the sony a1, canon r6, nikon z9
So I have a bad habit & hobby of shooting off photos and getting pictures on dark rides @ Disneyland. The strength smartphones have over are: - Lighter, not heavier like a mirrorless or dslr + lens. - Better lighting conditions to get pictures on the fly. - Don't have to time it & can snap away. Strengths actual camera bodies + lenses have over smartphones: - Can get a richer, clearer photo. - Images, blurred or not, can still be seen. - Media captured can be further edited for more detail. Ups & downs, still can't go wrong with either. But just be mindful that smartphone handsets have a long way to replicate the same media richness that designated cameras can do.
To be honest looking how good the reviewer is makes me believe that this channel has a bright future ✨ One of the best camera comparisons I've ever seen. Good luck Tom Rich 👍
In my opinion (except for the portrait shots) the s22 looks more pleasing. Perhaps a little over sharpened but overall the more attention grabbing and pleasing.
Do a Pixel 6/Pro and S22 Ultra comparison!!! Loved this review dude and I actually own both phones. Will love you photography opinion on either of them
It's a $120 lens on that EOS R6. Sure, a decent one at that. Also, comparing an unedited/unprocessed/unsharpened image out of a DSLR versus a ultra-processed, filtered and modified shot in a phone is kind of skewed. So if we're talking actual image quality, then the DSLR will win every time. BUT! If we're talking delivery time, and quickly adapting it for social media feeds. Then there's no need for a DSLR anymore for most people.
I'd argue there's no point in making an entire video to come to a conclusion every person knows by default, so this is definitely a waste of time. It's comparing apples to oranges to see which one is "better", which is extremely vague and most of the time it's perceived as "looking better", in which case he's being straight up unfair to his expensive camera gear in order to draw in an audience and falsely convince them a phone is ok, even against this camera, which is unbelievably false.
I appreciate how your photography-centric reviews focus not only on the positives but also honestly present any limitations in the phone cameras. Your balanced approach helps consumers make informed decisions.🙌
Tbh I can actually tell which is which from a phone screen, but that's because as a photographer I can identify which is oversharpened and pops and that to me looks worse. Great video anyway, it's still really cool how close phones are!
I like how HDR on some of these mobiles is so good that even when you have the raw, you sometime edit it (on mobile) and get worse results or spend way too much time editing it trying to look better than the HDR shot and it's not worth it at all.
The biggest giveaway in all photos is the oversharpness on the s22 ultra. You should have pop it up a lil bit more in the r6 shots. Great comparision though, s22 is definately worthy.
1. He's selling the phone. 2. The EOS R6 is a "full frame" camera so it will have way more depth of field blur, There are methods to deal with this, shooting up to F16 instead of F2.8, or you can image stack, which the camera should have a setting for? Or you can Stand back or zoom out then crop the image down to 12 megapixels (To match the phones 12 megapixels). The smaller the sensor the less depth of field, for better or worse, -cropping can help. You can also combine all the above options. 3. The minimum of F2.8 on the lens used for the Canon, is not fantastic for night photography and far better lenses are out there for it with lower F stop or T value, with the down/up side being more depth of field blur in the dark. 4. Mirrorless cameras with crop sensors exist, like APS-C and Micro four thirds cameras, however everything has pro's and cons. There is no perfect camera/lens that does everything. That all said, for most people the phone is probably fine if not better, unless you want good zoom, or real subject isolation, or if you need more pixels for your portraits etc for professional use, or if you want to have full control editing your shots, instead of having the phone plaster it's AI all over it :S.
I have noticed that the S22U's photos are consistently sharper than the R6's but when I look at them side by side the Samsung's photos look a bit oversharpened though it is crazy how close the smartphones have gotten to pro cameras because of computational photography though R6 will destroy the S22U when it comes to video as the phone cannot process those many images at the same quality.
I am subscribing to your channel because you are the only one comparing phone camera with dslr and I want all major models compared to dslr when each one gets launched
It kinda comes close if viewing on small devices, but its a fully 'computer processed' image vs not properly processed. In the R6 there's no computational processing taking place like HDR imaging, shadow pull, sharpening, iso compensation etc. The R6 is pretty much SOOC whereas the raw files on the phone are being fully processed, computational photography. At the very least he should've enabled one computational photography mode on the R6, like HDR. Sensor to sensor the bit depth alone on the much larger sensor blows anything on a smaller sensor away. Put them both through same processing and you'll see.
AYYYYY you got the S22 Ultra! The S22 pictures look pretty great and night mode is just straight up impressive! Portrait mode still needs more work though haha! Wow interesting! I found the Pixel 6 to beat the normal S22 in every way! The different sensors on the Ultra must really make a difference! Awesome video Tom! 😁
I have the best of both worlds, the s22u and the iPhone 13 pro max and I prefer the S22U. Did you take pics with the raw camera app and pro mode, both free from Samsung? Apple doesn't offer anything like that.
Excellent work. So good, everything youve touched on is practical real world testing information. So much better than even the biggest youtubers. Who spend 14 minutes talking about on paper specs while holding the phone in their hands. This is the best work I have seen in a review video. And Im convinced that I can more than get away with buying a flagship camera phone to make youtube videos and some social media photography, than going and having to buy a mid range phone and a dedicated camera.
I dunno, maybe I have a trained eye but it was very obvious which one was which. The S22 simply has too much sharpening and smudging artifacts which might make the image feel sharp but looks very unnatural. But that being said, it is still impressive how a little sensor can have decent results.
I just have the S22 and am amazed. I wonder what the difference in video quality is. I may dump my Canon 5dM3 for an upcoming trip and play with video some more.
Samsung has a rich bias towards saturation with colours on the screen of the phones themselves. If you view the files via a calibrated monitor the same images appear quite differently actually. I prefer the latter. Most phones add sharpening which is a giveaway most of the time. If you have set the same f stop for both the cameras, I do wonder how the Canon stacks up at the corner details. I would strongly suggest using raw files. That's where the images truly shine. That said, camera within phones have come such a long way in the last decade.
Sony has claimed smartphone cameras will take over DSLR cameras in few years. Well this video proves the point! Yet I feel there are many scenario's where DSLR is required, still it's a huge leap for smartphone cameras!
thank you tom , its all about Bokeh , if they nail that its all over for product photography with a camera , most people want to take their own product shots , another key area you dont need photoshop or capture one etc i just finished a product shoot with this camera , with a quick link up to my lap top , editing on the phone , client could not tell the difference she was happy with results . improvements need to be made still as i found bottles etc slightly distorted for my taste . great vid .
I have both- a cell camera and real DSLR camera. For what they do, point and shoot modern cell phone cameras are BETTER than real cameras. If however you want to shoot action, add unique effects, capture better images in low light and create accurate panos (using a tripod and slide rail adjusted to compensate for the correct nodal point), then a real camera with it's far larger sensor (20x's larger so it handles light better) will be superior. This is especially true after you edit the raw file and/or when you zoom in and pixel peep. Again, to simply point and shoot and click a button and share online something that fits in your back pocket, the cell camera wins hands down. It is also far easier to get a good shot on the fly with a cell phone. On a real camera, it is easy to take a bad, underexposed and blurry image. The potential to take a gallery worthy, epic image is going to be in favor of a real camera- though some of these cell cameras are no joke. Also, if the file size is so large on a cell, it will quickly eat up memory. Also, good luck emailing a file and sharing it without it being severely compressed. Save it on your PC and find a way to share that doesn't kill image quality- like uploading to Amazon Photos which is free to all prime members.
For me the oversharpening instantly gives it away especially on every wide shot. I'm really interested to see what these pictures would look like without all that oversharpening, I bet it would be even more pleasing.
@@ItsTomRich Yes, I understand and agree with you. However, most people are not going to edit photos in Lightshop and adjust them. Most people don't fully understand how to adjust all of the exposure, shutter, white balance controls on a camera or even on the Samsung S22 Ultra. I am learning photography and I barely understand some things in making these adjustments. So that is where the S22 Ultra is so valuable. In most cases it will take exceptional photos that don't need to be edited to look good. That is a magnificent success for the S22 Ultra. It really has become the best smartphone/high-end camera phone. Further, for knowledgeable professionals like you, Samsung's "RAW" app allows you to take photos in 16 bit color - something the iPhone is incapable of doing. The phone will capture and incredible amount of information for professionals that they can easily adjust in post editing.
I'd say in 5 years phones will surpass APSC sensors at the very least, sensors and lenses keep getting better and DSP and processors closing the gap in optics
Bottom line, unless you're working in professional video industry, as a photographer or a film producer, you can just buy a flagship phone from Samsung or IPhone. I'd even use an S22 ultra or even the S22+ as a vlogger or a RUclipsr
That's what's happening , phone companies are not marketing their cameras to photographers. It's the hobby shooter that they market to, not many people walk around with stand alone camera systems anymore.
Bro great video and the most I loved is the side by side comparison and we r wanting more of this kind of videos BTW I started watching your videos from today . Love u from 🇮🇳
It is very interesting, how the camera on the S22 Ultra is amazing to compared a camera ! Pre-order that nice Galaxy Phone, actually I use the Note9 and even now the pictures are already amazing
Have you also tried using the Pro Mode in Samsungs camera? There you can control ISO, light, focus, capture time and so on by yourself without Samsungs processing. This gives so much more options than the normal camera Mode.
The professional camera had it in terms of color in every photo, and since I'm watching on a 34" screen it was easy to spot the over sharpening on the phone, but in person it takes amazing photos and considering that it was up against a much more expensive dedicated camera it's really impressive, if Samsung introduced a "Natrural" or "Professional" setting in the normal camera that cut back the sharpening and aimed for realistic color it would be almost indistinguishable
Landscape photographers use Expert Raw on S22U and S21U, better dynamic range, less saturation, less brightness that samsung adds, raw 16bit, its nice to edit. For Portrait mode shooting in RAW also needs good a set, proper lighting room, lower ISO and you can get incredible shots, Night mode honestly regular mode is less bright than night mode found that interesting. if you like the night photography look stick to regular camera mode and lower iso and use raw. Overall great video, fair points on big screen there is a difference, unfortuntely no mode in expert raw and no selfie camera hopefully that changes with an update, s21U march 2022 got more camera features so its possible they may do this.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think either night or zoom photos use both the 12MP and 108MP sensors to combine the images and provide a sharper photo. I may be wrong but saw something about a feature like that during the announcement.
GREAT comparison - quick question and that is for someone just starting out in photography/videography, should I still invest in a "real" camera even though I have the S22 Ultra?
Unfortunately it wasn't really close, the sharpness was yucky on the samsung in most shots but I Was impressed with the lowlight car shot, that DR was nice.
And what about filming? I'm waiting for my S22 Ultra and would like to use it as a studio camera. I would prefer the Sony ZV-E10 with a 10-18mm lens to get that wide, separate and blurry background effect, but I had to change my old Note 8 and my budget isn't unlimited. So I'll have to work with the S22 Ultra for the moment. I can't find any valid comparaison. If you could talk about that it would me amazing. Thanks!
I am sure that your video isn’t sponsored by any other because I watched most videos of s22ultra comparing with iPhone 13pro showing ultra as inferior. I am using s21 ultra and used s21 both and found both excellent 👍🏻 in camera department. My IPhone 12 isn’t so good as s21 .you explain the power of Samsung camera sensors. Best of luck bro, Pls continue your good work. People want unbiased RUclipsrs like you.👍🏻😍
Yo dudes!! Just to let you know I've released a few presets specifically for RAWs from the Samsung S22 line, it's available at the top link in the description if you're interested :)
Check your video before u post... 7:21
Come on Tom where is the video comparison
@@idontusegmail7102 dude I don’t have the S22 any more 😂
Haha thankyou broo
When Big RUclipsrs are Trying to show the S22U cam inferior to the iPhone, small youtubers are doing excellent job showcasing the power of its lenses. Great job mate. 👏
Thanks dude appreciate that 👊👊
@Avishar I had iPhone for last 10 years, even though cameras are truly amazing, zoom capabilities of my S22U make it much more preferable when taking pictures. A minor difference in picture quality can be overlooked, but a huge difference in zoom capabilities are just making S22U much more useful.
@Avishar ,v0x0
@@neokhoonhoe7482 ?
Watching this from XR am already tired of iPhone, looking forward to buying samsung
If you still have the S22 Ultra, you should revisit this comparison. As part of the late August/early September update, there's been a significant update to how the cameras process images. The images now look even more comparable to DSLR, especially when in 108MP camera with "Detail Enhancer" enabled.
As someone who had Iphone as go-to phone laste 10years I have S22U one now and I am blown away by this phone in general, better experience then I had in any Iphone, camera wise its next lvl compared to anything we have on market, for me highest quilty feature is portrait video, it looks like a movie, you can literally take HD moon photos, the one you saying is not used so much, Id find it usefull only when taking photos with large group of people in it, otherwise i prefer standard 3:4
Personally, it's easy to distinguish which photos the phone takes with the oversharpening compared to the softer look that cameras produce. But still, S22 Ultra is an amazing camera no doubt! ❤️
Thanks for watching!!
Right.... bokeh is still better on the camera
agreed, and the HDR look from the phone is apparent
Its not really oversharpening, it's just pre-sharpened as auto mode just takes and edit the image for you.
Nope it's only sharpening on jpgs. You can shoot in raw it will look identical
It's very interesting to see how good mobile cameras has improved over the years. I recently ordered a S22 ultra, just to play around. I thought if this is that good, i might as well just have it. Gonna play around with landscape photography and low light shots at night. But gonna use tribod if the light is way too low.
Hello how is your experience?
@@devsunny10 I've been testing the phone a lot and are very happy with the results of the RAW photos. But i still going back to my system camera for better quality photos. But the S22 Ultra has certainly changed what i have with me. I don't carry compact cameras which can take RAW photos any longer, since the S22 Ultra has replaced it for me at least.
The quality of the samsung s22 ultra is just insane. Think of how far the smartphones have come... crazy.
I have the S21, S23 and S24 Ultra. They are nothing compared to the dedicated camera. In fact, after4 taking the picture with any of this models, the pictures get distorted because the software is trying to refine the photo and you cant even turn it off. This is a known issue with Samsung ultra phones. And don't forget that the 200 megapixel is enlarged by the software. The sensor in the camera is much much smaller. This is how Samsung cheats and lie to people. This issues are in Pro mode as well.
This is true. Anyone who wants to buy Samsung for the camera, do your research. The camera is good only for day to day photography.
Hey guys! So sorry there's an edit error at 7:18, but if you continue on there's a lightroom breakdown which goes through the differences in this shot in detail! Lots of shots to keep track of 😎
Yes I do actually agree with you - I think if I was shooting portraits properly (of a model etc) the portrait shots would come out better, which is why I included another portrait mode shot. Portraits of yourself are hard and I'll bear this in mind next time!
Can you compare Samsung's "Expert Raw" to the R6?
@@dirtydirtsgt4751 I won't do this directly, but I did cover expert pro raw a lot in my full photography review of the S22! Check the channel :)
It would be interesting to see RAW shots between the two. You could then match the S22 and the EOS camera settings and apply the same filtering in Lightroom. Most users won't be shooting RAW, but a lot of users won't add any color correction to their DSLR shots either.
Overall, great comparison to see!
My thoughts as well. Some of the Canon shots didn't look colour corrected enough. I felt this because I use an R6 and Pixel. Pixel definitely has great computational photography and portrait shots are very pleasing too. And for social media, I could do with Pixel JPEGs in certain scenarios. Definitely not for Prints, I mean, I can, but it wouldn't be anything like the R6 (or even enough to compare with my old 700D).
Samsung oversharpens and saturates a bit more. Since we cannot undo that without losing detail, For the R6, Lifting the shadows and using masked sharpening to give a more comparable image would be better. These days people don't buy mirrorless to shoot JPEGs.
Most people who shoot with DSLRs shoot in RAW, shooting in JPG is like buying a Ferrari, but only driving in first gear. A mobile is not even comparable to a good DSLR camera. Of course, straight out of the camera, on a TV screen, a mobile photo can look better. But if you are knowledgeable, and know how lightroom works. So the result will be considerably much better with a DSLR.
Looks like you had an editing problem at 7:21 but great comparison, crazy how good the phone cameras have improved last few years. I upgraded to S22 ultra from Note10 Plus and am pretty happy with it.
Traded in my note 10+ for it. Best investment.
i thought i was the only one who saw it lol
I feel like in all Samsung pictures the colors are really saturated making every object look separated (almost like there is a black line around every object looking like draw) while the Pro cam makes the colors softer and making everything looks in blended and realistic.
I recently bought s22 ultra and I'm kinda impressed with the performance and camera 🔥
I have ordered it a few hours ago. really keen to see it for myself in person soon!
You should not be so impressed.... He compares a HIGHLY processed S22 photo to a alomst zero processed R6 photo. If you process the R6 photo equal to the S22 it will be way better (btw. It´s an EF Lens, adapted to the R6 - it´s not an RF lens, made for the R6 and even if you take that into account it seems he own a very very bad (soft) lens. Send me a RAW shot of the R6 and you will see, whats possible... The only reason to prefer the S22 is that you have a lot less work to do.
@@Peter_Cetera been fotographing with it for a while now, and even though it still isn't as good as professional camera's, it is still impressive that a phone is capable of doing stuff like this
For statics objects and good light Im use the 108MP in many cases but I have to say, the portrait take great pictures.
I sell photos and for 2 and a half years I have only used my phone, 1st because in 4"x7" photos up to 2'x3' posters there are no differences in quality, if there are certain details that most people will not notice.
And 2nd, it is more challenging to be able to get the shot you want because of the limitations of the phone in terms of cameras but...the rain is not an obstacle, nor the sea, nor the rivers because it is waterproof....obviously, camera is camera but for small jobs it's great.
And I have to said....great video!!!
Amazing comparison 😍, I like youtubers focusing on S22 ultra more than iphone series
Thanks for watching man :)
Sharpness and details are totally different things. Phone camera is pan focus, Mirrorless full frame camera has depth field.
It's all equal when looking on a screen.
Take it for print, then you'll notice the difference.
Can't substitute sensor size and the amount of light it takes in.
yep, the "aint no replacement for displacement" with internal combustion engines works here pretty much the same
I always will love the output from dedicated cameras. Mobile captured images have an artificial look
Please do a full photography/videography tutorial video for the s22 Ultra!
I really love watching smartphone camera systems evolve over time and get better and better vs. pro cameras, and you also do such a great job to compare the cameras against each other.
I think the s22 is adding sharpening and clarity witch gives It a compressed crunchy look where the r6 looks very nice. At night the s22 will beat out the r6 because it does up the exposure in phone and such but when editing you'll notice the dynamic range in a raw file from the r6 is mutch better. The phone can probably beat out some entry level crop censor cameras but it can't beat a full frame uncompressed raw file from these newer cameras like the sony a1, canon r6, nikon z9
Yes you are totally right in detail :) as well as interchangeable lenses there are a ton of reasons to shoot with bigger cameras still
So I have a bad habit & hobby of shooting off photos and getting pictures on dark rides @ Disneyland. The strength smartphones have over are:
- Lighter, not heavier like a mirrorless or dslr + lens.
- Better lighting conditions to get pictures on the fly.
- Don't have to time it & can snap away.
Strengths actual camera bodies + lenses have over smartphones:
- Can get a richer, clearer photo.
- Images, blurred or not, can still be seen.
- Media captured can be further edited for more detail.
Ups & downs, still can't go wrong with either. But just be mindful that smartphone handsets have a long way to replicate the same media richness that designated cameras can do.
Every device has purpose. For photo i prefer using dslr. I can’t get feeling when use smartphone for hunting foto.
Imagine being a guest at a wedding and taking photos with an S22 Ultra and then comparing it to the images the actual photographer has.
🤣🤣🤣
They wouldn't compare. I have the S22 ultra and shoot on SONY cameras. Not even close!
@@stevensteele45 wow geeze I guess the s22 ultra camera is even better than I thought...... Holy hell!!
@@stevensteele45 damn S22 is that much better? sheeeesh
Just don’t get them printed and I’m sure they’ll look great 😉
To be honest looking how good the reviewer is makes me believe that this channel has a bright future ✨
One of the best camera comparisons I've ever seen.
Good luck Tom Rich 👍
Ah bro thanks so much!! Really appreciate that 🙌
Great video!! Was waiting to see your take on the S22 Ultra's cameras!! Please do a full S22 Ultra camera review too!! :)
Definitely planning on it man thank you 🙌
In my opinion (except for the portrait shots) the s22 looks more pleasing. Perhaps a little over sharpened but overall the more attention grabbing and pleasing.
Do a Pixel 6/Pro and S22 Ultra comparison!!! Loved this review dude and I actually own both phones. Will love you photography opinion on either of them
I just got a S22 ultra and it's freakin amazing.I like your enthusiasm and knowledge about photography. Subscribed 👍
Great to have you!
It's a $120 lens on that EOS R6.
Sure, a decent one at that.
Also, comparing an unedited/unprocessed/unsharpened image out of a DSLR versus a ultra-processed, filtered and modified shot in a phone is kind of skewed.
So if we're talking actual image quality, then the DSLR will win every time.
BUT! If we're talking delivery time, and quickly adapting it for social media feeds. Then there's no need for a DSLR anymore for most people.
I'd argue there's no point in making an entire video to come to a conclusion every person knows by default, so this is definitely a waste of time. It's comparing apples to oranges to see which one is "better", which is extremely vague and most of the time it's perceived as "looking better", in which case he's being straight up unfair to his expensive camera gear in order to draw in an audience and falsely convince them a phone is ok, even against this camera, which is unbelievably false.
Portrait mode is locked to main and 3x camera because those are the ones used for the stereoscopic depth map for the cutout.
Why do you have "only" 14.700 subs? You deserve millions! Amazing quality videos!
Thanks so much man
I appreciate how your photography-centric reviews focus not only on the positives but also honestly present any limitations in the phone cameras. Your balanced approach helps consumers make informed decisions.🙌
It's easy for me to differentiate since the s22 photos are incredibly sharper
Tbh I can actually tell which is which from a phone screen, but that's because as a photographer I can identify which is oversharpened and pops and that to me looks worse. Great video anyway, it's still really cool how close phones are!
Thanks so much for watching man! Yeah that's what the video is for just to show the differences but also how close they are (sometimes) :)
Solid video format. Solid comparison & explanation. 😭 You're cool, Tom!
Haha thanks so much for watching Jeremy!!
I like how HDR on some of these mobiles is so good that even when you have the raw, you sometime edit it (on mobile) and get worse results or spend way too much time editing it trying to look better than the HDR shot and it's not worth it at all.
Cette vidéo est la meilleure comparaison de photo à mon avis, merci pour cette vidéo.
It’s really easy to distinguish which is which… the really heavy processed photos are taken with the s22 ultra. But it’s impressive how good they are.
I definitely actually found some of them pretty hard to tell 😂
Just look at the image procesing and you will get it right 100% of the time. The added sharpness on the Samsung is a big give away.
Love the vid, Tom! Just an fyi though, there’s an error in portrait mode shot 3. Pictures are overlapped. Great vid none the less!
Thanks so much Danny, missed this one in my rewatch 🥲 I've put a comment clarifying
Nice video!
mobile photography has improved so much over the years....
Thanks dude! Yeah totally agree 🙌
The biggest giveaway in all photos is the oversharpness on the s22 ultra. You should have pop it up a lil bit more in the r6 shots. Great comparision though, s22 is definately worthy.
Yes agreed it's the giveaway! Difficult to know though whether I make it a harder test/quiz or make it more realistic 🤣
This is a great channel! I only caught sight of you folks in recent times, but it’s now among my favourite channels. ..
Thanks so much!! 🙌
Dude keep going like that. You have a great future as a youtuber 💪💪 A real one bro 🔥
Wow. I am looking forward for the S23 Ultra
Homie, you dnd´t do justice to the R6, i would love to see the Shutter speed on the R6, Aperture and Iso !
1. He's selling the phone.
2. The EOS R6 is a "full frame" camera so it will have way more depth of field blur, There are methods to deal with this, shooting up to F16 instead of F2.8, or you can image stack, which the camera should have a setting for? Or you can Stand back or zoom out then crop the image down to 12 megapixels (To match the phones 12 megapixels). The smaller the sensor the less depth of field, for better or worse, -cropping can help. You can also combine all the above options.
3. The minimum of F2.8 on the lens used for the Canon, is not fantastic for night photography and far better lenses are out there for it with lower F stop or T value, with the down/up side being more depth of field blur in the dark.
4. Mirrorless cameras with crop sensors exist, like APS-C and Micro four thirds cameras, however everything has pro's and cons. There is no perfect camera/lens that does everything.
That all said, for most people the phone is probably fine if not better, unless you want good zoom, or real subject isolation, or if you need more pixels for your portraits etc for professional use, or if you want to have full control editing your shots, instead of having the phone plaster it's AI all over it :S.
I have noticed that the S22U's photos are consistently sharper than the R6's but when I look at them side by side the Samsung's photos look a bit oversharpened though it is crazy how close the smartphones have gotten to pro cameras because of computational photography though R6 will destroy the S22U when it comes to video as the phone cannot process those many images at the same quality.
iPhone 14 dose the same
Amazing comparison, great job bro!
I am subscribing to your channel because you are the only one comparing phone camera with dslr and I want all major models compared to dslr when each one gets launched
You should try the Expert RAW on S22 ultra which lets you shoot in 16-bit
It kinda comes close if viewing on small devices, but its a fully 'computer processed' image vs not properly processed. In the R6 there's no computational processing taking place like HDR imaging, shadow pull, sharpening, iso compensation etc. The R6 is pretty much SOOC whereas the raw files on the phone are being fully processed, computational photography. At the very least he should've enabled one computational photography mode on the R6, like HDR. Sensor to sensor the bit depth alone on the much larger sensor blows anything on a smaller sensor away. Put them both through same processing and you'll see.
That night truck shot, mindblowing...
AYYYYY you got the S22 Ultra! The S22 pictures look pretty great and night mode is just straight up impressive! Portrait mode still needs more work though haha! Wow interesting! I found the Pixel 6 to beat the normal S22 in every way! The different sensors on the Ultra must really make a difference! Awesome video Tom! 😁
Thanks for watching bro!! Yeah the night mode is honestly insane to be honest haha.
This is true, pixel gave Samsung its pixel depth and shading tech in exchange for Samsung’s sensors.
Damn, how are u at just 15k , the video quality and the vid in general is marvelous
Thanks so much man!
Thats really crazy amount of detail in s22 ultra, difficult to understand which one is ultra by a normal person
Picked up a S22 Ultra this week. Very impressed by the capabilities of this phone, a little quirky but if used right works really well for what it is.
Enjoy your new phone!
I have the best of both worlds, the s22u and the iPhone 13 pro max and I prefer the S22U. Did you take pics with the raw camera app and pro mode, both free from Samsung? Apple doesn't offer anything like that.
Excellent work. So good, everything youve touched on is practical real world testing information. So much better than even the biggest youtubers. Who spend 14 minutes talking about on paper specs while holding the phone in their hands. This is the best work I have seen in a review video.
And Im convinced that I can more than get away with buying a flagship camera phone to make youtube videos and some social media photography, than going and having to buy a mid range phone and a dedicated camera.
Thanks so much for this comment, that is really appreciated! So glad it helped.
You earned my subscribe brother... And i am glad that randomly i found your channel.. ...
Keep going on...
Best of luckk
Thanks so much 👊👊
I dunno, maybe I have a trained eye but it was very obvious which one was which.
The S22 simply has too much sharpening and smudging artifacts which might make the image feel sharp but looks very unnatural. But that being said, it is still impressive how a little sensor can have decent results.
I just have the S22 and am amazed. I wonder what the difference in video quality is. I may dump my Canon 5dM3 for an upcoming trip and play with video some more.
To fix the edge blur in portrait I make the blue level 1 after the shot is taken. They look better then
Great video! That church shot could have been made a lot better on the R6 by placing it on a tripod and taking a long exposure!
Yes definitely true! Though not a super fair comparison as obviously the phone doesn’t require a tripod
@@ItsTomRich Yeah, true, but on the other hand having long exposure as an option is a huge benefit of pro cameras!
Samsung has a rich bias towards saturation with colours on the screen of the phones themselves. If you view the files via a calibrated monitor the same images appear quite differently actually. I prefer the latter. Most phones add sharpening which is a giveaway most of the time. If you have set the same f stop for both the cameras, I do wonder how the Canon stacks up at the corner details. I would strongly suggest using raw files. That's where the images truly shine. That said, camera within phones have come such a long way in the last decade.
Sony has claimed smartphone cameras will take over DSLR cameras in few years. Well this video proves the point! Yet I feel there are many scenario's where DSLR is required, still it's a huge leap for smartphone cameras!
Great video! Thanks mate
Love you're video man please make a full video about the camera and video of s22 ultra setting tips tricks.
Awesome review. No one has done it better that I've seen. Subscribed💪
Thanks so much bro!!
thank you tom , its all about Bokeh , if they nail that its all over for product photography with a camera , most people want to take their own product shots , another key area you dont need photoshop or capture one etc
i just finished a product shoot with this camera , with a quick link up to my lap top , editing on the phone , client could not tell the difference she was happy with results . improvements need to be made still as i found bottles etc slightly distorted for my taste .
great vid .
Thanks for watching
Amazing video, thank you!!
Couldn't believe my fricking eyes when i saw the first portrait mode shot. This is insane
Great video! Loving my S22 ultra so far 😍
Nice! Thanks for watching 😁
dude make with split screen its hard to understand which pic is which
man I love your keep it coming
I have both- a cell camera and real DSLR camera. For what they do, point and shoot modern cell phone cameras are BETTER than real cameras. If however you want to shoot action, add unique effects, capture better images in low light and create accurate panos (using a tripod and slide rail adjusted to compensate for the correct nodal point), then a real camera with it's far larger sensor (20x's larger so it handles light better) will be superior. This is especially true after you edit the raw file and/or when you zoom in and pixel peep.
Again, to simply point and shoot and click a button and share online something that fits in your back pocket, the cell camera wins hands down. It is also far easier to get a good shot on the fly with a cell phone. On a real camera, it is easy to take a bad, underexposed and blurry image. The potential to take a gallery worthy, epic image is going to be in favor of a real camera- though some of these cell cameras are no joke. Also, if the file size is so large on a cell, it will quickly eat up memory. Also, good luck emailing a file and sharing it without it being severely compressed. Save it on your PC and find a way to share that doesn't kill image quality- like uploading to Amazon Photos which is free to all prime members.
You earned my subscribe brother... And i am Happy that I randomly found your channel.
I hope we get to a million subscribe soon🤭
Thanks so much Peter!!
For me the oversharpening instantly gives it away especially on every wide shot. I'm really interested to see what these pictures would look like without all that oversharpening, I bet it would be even more pleasing.
Let's go !
Thank you for the video 🥳
Hahah you're welcome man!
There is this app on the Galaxy Store made my Samsung it called Expert RAW. You can take 16 bit raw photos and edit them easily!
This will be covered in the review :)
Great video! Honestly, the S22 blows away the Canon in many shots. The shot of the jeep in lowlight is a good example.
Is certain situations, computational photography is much better but a lot of others sensor size and interchangeable lenses beats the Samsung out :)
@@ItsTomRich Yes, I understand and agree with you. However, most people are not going to edit photos in Lightshop and adjust them. Most people don't fully understand how to adjust all of the exposure, shutter, white balance controls on a camera or even on the Samsung S22 Ultra. I am learning photography and I barely understand some things in making these adjustments. So that is where the S22 Ultra is so valuable. In most cases it will take exceptional photos that don't need to be edited to look good. That is a magnificent success for the S22 Ultra. It really has become the best smartphone/high-end camera phone.
Further, for knowledgeable professionals like you, Samsung's "RAW" app allows you to take photos in 16 bit color - something the iPhone is incapable of doing. The phone will capture and incredible amount of information for professionals that they can easily adjust in post editing.
I'd say in 5 years phones will surpass APSC sensors at the very least, sensors and lenses keep getting better and DSP and processors closing the gap in optics
Bottom line, unless you're working in professional video industry, as a photographer or a film producer, you can just buy a flagship phone from Samsung or IPhone. I'd even use an S22 ultra or even the S22+ as a vlogger or a RUclipsr
Perfectly said.
That's what's happening , phone companies are not marketing their cameras to photographers.
It's the hobby shooter that they market to, not many people walk around with stand alone camera systems anymore.
I loved your review...appreciate taking your time.
Subscribed right away!
Samsung really is workin hard 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Thanks for watching Johann!
@@ItsTomRich can't find U on any socmed accts like IG 😅
@itstomrich Twitter :) @tomrichshoots IG!
@@ItsTomRich Followed both 😉👌🏻
Thx. Verran impressive. I have shot only macros with s22. Works fine.
Thanks for the video. Would you do a camera comparison between the pixel 6 pro and the s22 ultra? Thanks again
Portraits are better but you should use the dedicated 3× lens wich is made for portraits...
The giveaway was Samsung's over sharpening and saturation, yes those shots were more ig ready but I still like the natural look from the r6
Awesome video brother 🙌. . . Quick question though, what focal length did u shoot on DSLR for ultra wide photo ?
Bro great video and the most I loved is the side by side comparison and we r wanting more of this kind of videos BTW I started watching your videos from today .
Love u from 🇮🇳
Thanks for watching man! Appreciate the support 🙌
If I’m correct the 3x and 10x lenses on the Samsung are 10 mega pixels, either way absolute great video
It is very interesting, how the camera on the S22 Ultra is amazing to compared a camera ! Pre-order that nice Galaxy Phone, actually I use the Note9 and even now the pictures are already amazing
Except for the portrait mode
Overall Samsung's photos is more pleasing for the eyes and have a lot more details
Not really a fair comparison for detail, you should have used primes on the R6
Have you also tried using the Pro Mode in Samsungs camera? There you can control ISO, light, focus, capture time and so on by yourself without Samsungs processing. This gives so much more options than the normal camera Mode.
Coming in the full photography review 😁
@@ItsTomRich Uh nice. I can't wait to finally see the phone in full action.
Really helpful. ♥️
The professional camera had it in terms of color in every photo, and since I'm watching on a 34" screen it was easy to spot the over sharpening on the phone, but in person it takes amazing photos and considering that it was up against a much more expensive dedicated camera it's really impressive, if Samsung introduced a "Natrural" or "Professional" setting in the normal camera that cut back the sharpening and aimed for realistic color it would be almost indistinguishable
I agree!! Full photo review coming out soon and I'll cover a lot of this :)
There is an option for pro mode or expert raw, which allows u full control to iso, white balance, etc
@@coconutwater-connoisseur1897 It’s cool but I’m pretty sure the phone knows better than me, (I’m not at all a professional)
Landscape photographers use Expert Raw on S22U and S21U, better dynamic range, less saturation, less brightness that samsung adds, raw 16bit, its nice to edit. For Portrait mode shooting in RAW also needs good a set, proper lighting room, lower ISO and you can get incredible shots, Night mode honestly regular mode is less bright than night mode found that interesting. if you like the night photography look stick to regular camera mode and lower iso and use raw. Overall great video, fair points on big screen there is a difference, unfortuntely no mode in expert raw and no selfie camera hopefully that changes with an update, s21U march 2022 got more camera features so its possible they may do this.
I use a 24" 1080p monitor for RUclips while I work and even on that I could easily see the oversharpening and processing artifacts.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think either night or zoom photos use both the 12MP and 108MP sensors to combine the images and provide a sharper photo. I may be wrong but saw something about a feature like that during the announcement.
Yes I wouldn't be surprised at all! It's really pretty impressive.
GREAT comparison - quick question and that is for someone just starting out in photography/videography, should I still invest in a "real" camera even though I have the S22 Ultra?
Unfortunately it wasn't really close, the sharpness was yucky on the samsung in most shots but I Was impressed with the lowlight car shot, that DR was nice.
And what about filming? I'm waiting for my S22 Ultra and would like to use it as a studio camera. I would prefer the Sony ZV-E10 with a 10-18mm lens to get that wide, separate and blurry background effect, but I had to change my old Note 8 and my budget isn't unlimited. So I'll have to work with the S22 Ultra for the moment. I can't find any valid comparaison. If you could talk about that it would me amazing. Thanks!
I immediatly saw which was the S22 Ultra, due to the exaggerate color.
I am sure that your video isn’t sponsored by any other because I watched most videos of s22ultra comparing with iPhone 13pro showing ultra as inferior.
I am using s21 ultra and used s21 both and found both excellent 👍🏻 in camera department. My IPhone 12 isn’t so good as s21 .you explain the power of Samsung camera sensors.
Best of luck bro,
Pls continue your good work. People want unbiased RUclipsrs like you.👍🏻😍
Thanks so much for this nice feedback man :)