Michael Sandel Interview LIVE India Today Conclave 2023 | Prof Harvard University On Divided World

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 мар 2023
  • Watch the interview of Michael Sandel exclusively at India Today Conclave 2023. The political philosopher & professor of Harvard Law School talk about ideas of justice and why we are so divided.
    Watch India Today Conclave 2023 as exciting innovators, thought leaders, impact creators, policy makers, and path-finders driving change talk to India Today about their vision of the role of ‘New India’ in the new world. With the 20th anniversary edition of the India Today Conclave, India is slated to become a magnetic new centre and it’s stewardship of the G20 this year offers a big opportunity for it to imprint its agenda in an emerging multipolar world. This is the India Moment.
    #indiatodayconclave2023 #michaelsandel #indiatoday #itlivestream
    Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.
    All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!
    India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today RUclips channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.
    Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!
    Download App: indiatoday.link/wHaj
    Follow us: Official website: www.indiatoday.in/
    Twitter: / indiatoday
    Facebook: / indiatoday

Комментарии • 38

  • @ckakunje
    @ckakunje Год назад +8

    Weird parallels drawn between western and Indian context reminds me how four blind people described an elephant after touching different parts

    • @adityarathore2036
      @adityarathore2036 Год назад

      But were these four people wrong, is truth subjective or is the truth objective which never changes.

    • @Shiva-jw5ds
      @Shiva-jw5ds 4 месяца назад

      ​@@adityarathore2036Truth is Subjective, Facts are Objective.
      And yes those 4 people were wrong, coz 4 different parts aren't enough to paint the whole picture.

  • @rajbalasingh1014
    @rajbalasingh1014 4 месяца назад

    Great !👍 wonderful thoughts 👏👏...

  • @normalhuman6260
    @normalhuman6260 9 дней назад

    Michael Sandel is one of the greatest minds of our generation. His Justice series is a must watch.

  • @Shiva-jw5ds
    @Shiva-jw5ds 4 месяца назад

    So our Professor is explaining the US Political System and Rajdeep is applying that perspective to Indian Politics.
    Very Good👍

  • @buxptest
    @buxptest Год назад +1

    Contribution to society is so essential

  • @kalyanidivakar
    @kalyanidivakar Год назад

    Such discourses make sense who want to stabilize society

  • @thomasthomasphilp4393
    @thomasthomasphilp4393 Год назад +1

    Middle Class which is the backbone of democracy is diminishing. This is the reason!

  • @lethalnuke
    @lethalnuke Год назад +3

    Rajdeep’s questions are paragraph in itself and includes a lot of assertions. That might be his style. But it lacks the punch by the time he completes his narrative.

  • @venugopaljee
    @venugopaljee Год назад +2

    Graphics at the background are distracting and are strenuous to the eyes

  • @riesenbuhai
    @riesenbuhai 7 месяцев назад

    Michael Sandel has deep reflections of liberal politics. After all beeing an extremist in either direction is not the solution formbeeimg a healthy society and for the minors who need to be protected it's important to understand that even stupid people have rights and of course anxiety.

  • @kalyanidivakar
    @kalyanidivakar Год назад +1

    Tech is not disruptive but how it is used make sense because people also got benefited from same Tech. Technology always useful but misuse of it is Problem, for every thing both aspects are always there just similar to medicine which is poison at inappropriate dose. Education about in Appropriate doses needed and need to understand side effects of medicine by society.

  • @ssnayar994
    @ssnayar994 Год назад

    30 years ago?
    Didn't he conduct a session at INFOSYS?

  • @karanvaghela1796
    @karanvaghela1796 Год назад +3

    Forget all these we don't even have own places of worship. Ask musalman and Christian to give up their own places of worship forget about that. This debate is not released to Indian perspective.

    • @vir00
      @vir00 7 месяцев назад

      He is selling a neo liberal worldview and keeping up a facade of nationalism or identity just to keep the common folk under control. In this framework religious and ethnic groups are slowly diluted and controlled by the technocrats and will give up their places if the state decides so.

  • @shyamsumansingh
    @shyamsumansingh 6 месяцев назад

    1:00 Another slap on rajdeep 5:19

  • @samm8654
    @samm8654 9 месяцев назад

    मेरिट धारी भांडो की डांग मार दी मायकल दादा ने😂😂😂😂 हमारे इधर भी बोहात मेरिट धारी हे इधर उनके चोचले बोहट हे इधर😂😂😂

  • @buxptest
    @buxptest Год назад

    Democracy is the same every where. Just the socialist aspect differs

  • @hina1960
    @hina1960 Год назад +1

    People of India doesn't think democracy in India is in danger only few people who have cherished privilege in this country and now not getting those privilege thinks democracy is in dangers.

    • @anujchaturvedi6296
      @anujchaturvedi6296 Год назад +1

      How is democracy in danger in India? It's not your Pakistan. We have elections almost all years.

  • @Nashaking316
    @Nashaking316 Год назад +1

    No when you lie that a farmer got killed when he died of an accident we call you anti national. We don’t mind your questions!!!

  • @hrithiksingh5069
    @hrithiksingh5069 Год назад +2

    Rajdeep can name INC for liberal party of India but he can't name BJP in hyper nationalist 😂

  • @thomasthomasphilp4393
    @thomasthomasphilp4393 Год назад

    Algorithms must be banned.

  • @manishsood6119
    @manishsood6119 Год назад +1

    People who lost through Democratic process looked upon Judiciary to rule indirectly but having failed there are looking upon Western countries and scholars and Cabal to plan downfall of Democratically elected Govt .

  • @drsp374
    @drsp374 Год назад

    BS

  • @CRuS4D3R88
    @CRuS4D3R88 Год назад

    Whole discussion is condescending towards the NON LEFT implying that they r the bad guys which makes the discussion futile coz this condescending attitude is the nub of the problem. . RW could be bad guys in the world but not in India coz hindutvavadis are not same as European American nationalists, hyper nationalists. The OET(Ontology, epistemology, theology) and history of hindu DHARAM(majority Hindus being the oppressed in medieval India) is completely different.
    Read sai depaks book - INDIA that is bharat and India bharat and Pakistan
    Pseudoliberals have this tendency to deny any grievance or hurt of majority community and accept non grievances of an ORGANISED AGGRESSIVE MINORITY 'Peaceful' community saying that the majority community cannot be a victim. That will keep polarising the majority.
    Pseudoliberals r in bed with the peaceful community

  • @muravi8167
    @muravi8167 Год назад

    BAKWASEN - what is the REAL value added in this interaction ?

  • @seshanm54
    @seshanm54 Год назад +1

    One of the most muddled discussions I have heard. Here is a 'woke' Michael Sandel talking about the 'tyranny of merit' and a Rajdeep trying to fit an inverted set of Indian circumstances. Already the Michael Sandel is saying "us".
    Talk about identity and hubris!
    All self-labelled.

  • @UdayKumar-dz3uk
    @UdayKumar-dz3uk Год назад

    Extremely boring

  • @thedroidbha
    @thedroidbha Год назад +1

    Totally disagree with the word/identification as "hyper nationalist." It's kind of dumb - one is either a nationalist or not. Similar to one is either in love or not, there is nothing like hyper love... Just ridiculous.

    • @focusmaestro4013
      @focusmaestro4013 11 месяцев назад

      Absolutely wrong! It is obvious that there can be various stages of affection towards a given subject, like a spectrum. That's why words like 'mania' exists. Maybe you are a rare human who runs according to a binary style of thoughts, Anyway, You can disagree....your view being dumb or correct is another matter. However, learn how to express your opinions in a respectful manner.