Tamron with the Quality / Price Ratio... is just insane! I have the 35-150 f2.8 and I love how you get a 35 f2 prime (because it is that sharp) and a 35-150 zoom all in one lens, but this Macro lens for $699 is ridiculous. I am still waiting for that crazy zoom I have heard some rumors about (28-180mm f2.8 Tamron might come out with) that would be a game changer, especially with vibration compensation.
Tamron always surprises. I got a while ago my first super zoom 28-200 from Tamron. And how positively I was surprised, sharp and a magical 3D pop, even in landscapes. So I guess this 90mm will even do better :) tempting!!!!!
To be clear: if you are anywhere *near* the minimum focusing distance you will not be at f/2.8 it will be more like 5.6. you won't be able to use f/2.7 until you back out to portrait/headshot ranges.
You are able to program the button to switch the MF ring to aperture and back. Or do it live with the Android app if you're on sticks. programmable Linear MF is also a Tamron hallmark with the latest lenses. Some amazing things happen with the USB-C port. Oh: and the weather seals are top flight.
Thanks for your review! The Nikon 105mm 2.8 Z macro lens can't use Nikon's Z teleconverters. Can these teleconverters be used with this new Tamron lens?
I wonder how good this is for film scanning. I'm kind of missing a nice macro that isn't too long and has a good flat field curvature.. I've only found the Loawa (65mm?) for Z-mount, but that's constantly out of stock.
I'm considering this for the sony. How's does this lens function when it comes to video? Is the stabilization decent? Assuming I wouldn't have any issues if this is on a tripod for closeups at weddings and or on a gimbal.
"Hello, I need your help. I recently switched from the Nikon D850 to the Z7II. I'm a product photographer, and during my time with the Nikon D850, I primarily used the Tamron 90mm lens, which I was very happy with. I also had the Nikon 105mm f/2.8, but I found the colors and sharpness of the Tamron 90mm lens to be outstanding on the D850. However, when I use the same Tamron lens on the Z7II, I feel that the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 performs much better. Now, I’m considering selling both lenses and buying either a Tamron or Nikon lens specifically for the Z mount. I’m a bit confused about which to choose. Will the Tamron still give me the same sharpness and color, or is the Nikon Z 105mm MC superior? Could you please make a comparison video? It would be very helpful for me to decide between the new Z mount Tamron and Nikon lenses. Thank you!"
Hi! I need to get the Z mount lens to make a comparison video as I didn’t have it for this review. What I will say is you can’t go wrong with either. All my b roll in my videos is shot with the Nikko Z version so it you like what you see these are The results.
@@btonelli Thank you, I also bought the 28-75 G2 Z mount and experienced focus issues, however once I worked more with the lens I learned it. This is the sharpest lens I have , even sharper then some native Z glass
@@marklosentes7988 if your camera has IBIS that will kick in. Also you will probably use a tripod. If so always good to turn of IBIS when using it on a tripod
Did you compare it to z mc 105 2.8...you only mention that 105 is too long, but not how is the IQ difference, AF difference, bokeh.....between those two...cause the price is much closer than it seemed at first...you can find z mc 105 2.8 for 800-850$ now...not much more expensive...so the question is, which is better overall?
@@mihailotancev3284 I didnt compare them as I was only passed the Sony version for the review. It’s not accurate to compare Sony versus Nikon as the cameras have different sensors, different in camera corrections etc.
Yes but does that make a difference? Tamron has been known for years to make high quality macro lenses. Regardless if it’s near the price of the Nikon, a good lens is a good lens
Tampon has been known to make industry leading macro lenses for years but at an attractive price point. Optically better than Sony but doesn’t have lens stabilisation like the Sony
@@btonelli I had and used Tamron 70 200 G2 lens for a year. Had it with me in Bali and it failed! Lens de calibrated due to higher temperatures I believe and most almost all of my work was slightly out of focus. Tamron look fine sure but Gmaster lenses never failed me! This was back in 2018 so perhaps 2024 Tamron are better. Sony 90mm was released almost 10 years ago no wonder performed less sharp. Back in 2014 ppl cared more about the quality of their work then gear XDDD. Most of folks on forum who bitch about lenses performance have no idea about aesthetics and good composition. That is cos most modern photographers idea about education in photography is watch lese tutorials heavily sponsored by manufactures. Ppl should be in a field photographing not masturbating over sharpness of their image XD
@btonelli Didn't you just hold the Nikon lens on the other hand and said its a longer lens? What hold you back from comparing them in image quality then?
@ two different cameras. A7RV vs Z8/Z9. Not a fair comparison as resolution is different and also how the image is rendered. If I made that comparison the Sony would look sharper on RUclips as there is more resolution.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Tamron with the Quality / Price Ratio... is just insane! I have the 35-150 f2.8 and I love how you get a 35 f2 prime (because it is that sharp) and a 35-150 zoom all in one lens, but this Macro lens for $699 is ridiculous. I am still waiting for that crazy zoom I have heard some rumors about (28-180mm f2.8 Tamron might come out with) that would be a game changer, especially with vibration compensation.
This macro is really one of their better lenses I feel as of late.
Tamron always surprises. I got a while ago my first super zoom 28-200 from Tamron. And how positively I was surprised, sharp and a magical 3D pop, even in landscapes. So I guess this 90mm will even do better :) tempting!!!!!
@@ArminHirmer it surprised me how good it was
I preordered. Cannot wait to get it. Every macro that i own is so good.
Awesome. Enjoy
To be clear: if you are anywhere *near* the minimum focusing distance you will not be at f/2.8 it will be more like 5.6. you won't be able to use f/2.7 until you back out to portrait/headshot ranges.
You are able to program the button to switch the MF ring to aperture and back. Or do it live with the Android app if you're on sticks. programmable Linear MF is also a Tamron hallmark with the latest lenses. Some amazing things happen with the USB-C port. Oh: and the weather seals are top flight.
Thanks for the info on this! Yes the weather sealing is good
Thanks for your review! The Nikon 105mm 2.8 Z macro lens can't use Nikon's Z teleconverters. Can these teleconverters be used with this new Tamron lens?
Thanks for watching. Great question! I honestly haven’t tried this. If the Z mount is available I’ll see if I can try it out
i remember using the original Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Di back in the DSLR days. quite a bang-for-buck lens for both macro and portait. :)
@@whynospoon yes a very solid lens. This builds on that
@@btonelliI own the 60mm f2. It's not perfect but it's insanely sharp. If it ever broke I'd be devastated. It's my go to for product photography.
@@Princeton_James never tried that but a good macro lens is such a necessity. I would be lost without mine
I wonder how good this is for film scanning. I'm kind of missing a nice macro that isn't too long and has a good flat field curvature.. I've only found the Loawa (65mm?) for Z-mount, but that's constantly out of stock.
Think it will do very well for film scanning
I’m sold Bobby I’m ordering tomorrow thanks buddy
@@Photojouralist123 enjoy! Love to hear your thoughts
I'm considering this for the sony. How's does this lens function when it comes to video? Is the stabilization decent? Assuming I wouldn't have any issues if this is on a tripod for closeups at weddings and or on a gimbal.
Thanks
@@RishiRajKoul thanks for watching
How is this compared to the 24-70 gm II size wise? asking as wondering if this lens will fit my under water housing
Without the hood should be fine. It’s not really that big. It’s the same height as the Sigma 24-70 DG DN 2
For the first time the Z mount is released at the same time and the price is the same. No Z mount extra price❤
@@pr4y indeed. Unfortunately didn’t get the Z mount for review
"Hello, I need your help. I recently switched from the Nikon D850 to the Z7II. I'm a product photographer, and during my time with the Nikon D850, I primarily used the Tamron 90mm lens, which I was very happy with. I also had the Nikon 105mm f/2.8, but I found the colors and sharpness of the Tamron 90mm lens to be outstanding on the D850.
However, when I use the same Tamron lens on the Z7II, I feel that the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 performs much better. Now, I’m considering selling both lenses and buying either a Tamron or Nikon lens specifically for the Z mount. I’m a bit confused about which to choose. Will the Tamron still give me the same sharpness and color, or is the Nikon Z 105mm MC superior?
Could you please make a comparison video? It would be very helpful for me to decide between the new Z mount Tamron and Nikon lenses. Thank you!"
Hi! I need to get the Z mount lens to make a comparison video as I didn’t have it for this review.
What I will say is you can’t go wrong with either. All my b roll in my videos is shot with the Nikko Z version so it you like what you see these are
The results.
buying this
Solid lens. Enjoy!
@@btonelli Thank you, I also bought the 28-75 G2 Z mount and experienced focus issues, however once I worked more with the lens I learned it. This is the sharpest lens I have , even sharper then some native Z glass
how does the tamron compare to sony's 90mm?
@@TedNghiem I would say the Tamron is faster AF and sharper
Its a winner for sure! For the record, this lens has no Image Stabilization (VC)
Yes corrected the video. Took the specs from BH photo and they mislabeled it. Corrections take some time on the back end but will be removed
ordered one on your link
Thank you!
does it have image stabilization? my purpose is for Underwater shot
@@marklosentes7988 no it doesn’t. I was mistaken early on as BH photo states it does but inside the lens there is no IS
@@btonelli If I am planning to use it for MACRO 1:1 video @ 4k then I should get with IS ?
@@marklosentes7988 if your camera has IBIS that will kick in. Also you will probably use a tripod. If so always good to turn of IBIS when using it on a tripod
Did you compare it to z mc 105 2.8...you only mention that 105 is too long, but not how is the IQ difference, AF difference, bokeh.....between those two...cause the price is much closer than it seemed at first...you can find z mc 105 2.8 for 800-850$ now...not much more expensive...so the question is, which is better overall?
@@mihailotancev3284 I didnt compare them as I was only passed the Sony version for the review. It’s not accurate to compare Sony versus Nikon as the cameras have different sensors, different in camera corrections etc.
How about its autofocus?
@@Ltmlaine very fast
Beautiful but the price is so close to the native nikon 105.
Yes but does that make a difference? Tamron has been known for years to make high quality macro lenses. Regardless if it’s near the price of the Nikon, a good lens is a good lens
No ibis though
@@000CloudStrife yes it has it
@@btonelli it has is from the body not a combination of the lens and body.
@@btonelli so am I right?
@@000CloudStrife yes. I took the info from BH Photo and their site has it wrong. I’ve edited the video but waiting for RUclips to update it
Is this not a lens for poor people? How is this relate to Sony 90mm Macro?
Tampon has been known to make industry leading macro lenses for years but at an attractive price point. Optically better than Sony but doesn’t have lens stabilisation like the Sony
@@btonelli I had and used Tamron 70 200 G2 lens for a year. Had it with me in Bali and it failed! Lens de calibrated due to higher temperatures I believe and most almost all of my work was slightly out of focus. Tamron look fine sure but Gmaster lenses never failed me! This was back in 2018 so perhaps 2024 Tamron are better. Sony 90mm was released almost 10 years ago no wonder performed less sharp. Back in 2014 ppl cared more about the quality of their work then gear XDDD. Most of folks on forum who bitch about lenses performance have no idea about aesthetics and good composition. That is cos most modern photographers idea about education in photography is watch lese tutorials heavily sponsored by manufactures. Ppl should be in a field photographing not masturbating over sharpness of their image XD
Come on man... Came to see the video for a comparison with the Nikon 105.
@@michaelk6957 never said it would be a comparison. Also I wasn’t given the Nikon version.
@btonelli Didn't you just hold the Nikon lens on the other hand and said its a longer lens? What hold you back from comparing them in image quality then?
@ two different cameras. A7RV vs Z8/Z9. Not a fair comparison as resolution is different and also how the image is rendered. If I made that comparison the Sony would look sharper on RUclips as there is more resolution.
@@btonelli Oh ok. Now it makes sense