This was utterly fascinating. I’m just a truck driver. I failed CSE maths because I’m number dyslexic but I adore science. It’s the way forward for everything.
It really is incredible stuff, isn't it? I work in I.T., and I feel an overwhelming sense of imposter syndrome when it comes to certain aspects of Computer Science...
Hannah Fry has just accepted a position as a Professor at Cambridge University focusing on the public understanding of mathematics, so we can expect even more content from her in the coming years.
@@starsandnightvision you really think biden matters? you really think he is calling the shots? All USA politics is equally corrupt, and the people making the decisions are not elected, but deep state. Idiots cheering for one side or the other like it will change anything.
@@starsandnightvision if you are not crooked, you are not in american politics. Its built on corporations donating millions to get their way on critical issues like removing regulations, removing competitors, anything to make more money
@@ronin6158 Quantum doesn't care about 'consciousness' at all. It cares about interaction. I hate when people think that 'observation' means 'a person looked at it' no, 'observation' just means taking the measurement made a change. Whatever you used to get the data from the particle collapsed the wave function in that moment. Doesn't even matter if the data of the measurement was destroyed before anyone could see it, the 'observation' was taken. It is the interaction that collapses the wave form, not a consciousness.
@@ThornMu Yeah, people think that we observe things telepathically and not through beaming a ton of particles around. Which at a macro-scale does make some sense - photons don't really do anything much at a macro scale, so we think that seeing is just getting information at the distance with no consequence whatsoever. But the fact that they can't comprehend that at some point even such small particles will have an effect on another particle position / distribution in space does really peeve me.
Quantum Computing Stocks Collapsing has been projected since the second quarter of 2024. I also invested wrongly, but Vivian's professionalism is high on the stock market. Today, I am glad I didn't fall victim to the dip.
Lots of people have been talking about Vivian R Campbell, wish I knew earlier than now and its never too late for me to start afresh even at this stage of loosing $300k to QBTS and RGTI.
I just looked her up on Google and I am impressed by her track record after viewing her official web page. This is what I needed! I sent an email and await her response. Thanks for sharing.
As is customary, the equities are merely market ballooning and will soon require another market to do so. They are the heads of the financial balloon so better I get it right with my portfolio now.
well done bloomberg. this is the most time in recent past i have paid absolute attention to a RUclips video. Absolutely captivating kudos to the crew behind this video.
One thing that was not mentioned in the video: most of the capacity of IBM supercomputers is used to start various wars in the world, to monitor and manipulate everyone in the world.
Every time I encounter someone wetting their pants over 'the risks of AI' I ask them if they understand the risks from quantum computing. The answer is always a puzzled "No". All of humanity will benefit from quantum, provided humanity doesn't behave as it has been for the past few thousand years. So, best of luck with that.
As someone who’s been following Hannah since 2014, and is used to see her featured on colourful Numberphile videos, it’s quite surprising to see her in something that’s shot and edited like a Denis Villeneuve film
I work with museums to run educational shows for kids. I did some stuff on quantum for the parents and one worked for a consultantcy firm for the government. They hired me to throw together some ideas for the government. My contribution boiled down to "if you pushed science and esp quantum to kids entering highschool when you came to power you would have a whole lot of people with PhD s in it now. The quote didn't get used
Fun fact: quantum computing hardware contains a lot of analog components, especially the physical qubits themselves. The programmed signals we use to excite a quantum device should more or less match its resonating frequency and thus typically take the form of continuous, modulated sine waves. (In other words, square waves are not suitable to excite a physical qubit, however a compatible digital-to-analog converter may be employed to generate the required resonating waveform). The manipulation of waves in the quantum confined devices, under the right conditions, is what allows one to obtain the interference, entanglement, and superposition for the quantum experiments :) - a quantum hardware engineer who builds quantum computers for a living
To simplify what he typed: Analog [sine waves] devices are used because they have a range of values that can be changed / fine tuned. As opposed to digital [square waves] which are either high or low. Imagine a digital clock vs an analog clock. Digital clocks simply display one whole number after the next, but an analog clock you can see the gradual shifting of the hands between numbers. @@success9271
0:00 - Introduction: IBM’s Quantum Computing Facility 0:49 - The promise and risks of quantum computing 1:53 - IBM Quantum System Two: Exploring the technology 3:14 - How quantum computers work: Superposition and qubits 4:33 - Applications of quantum computing in science and industry 5:55 - Inside IBM’s lab: The hardware and challenges 7:12 - Cooling to absolute zero: Maintaining quantum stability 8:20 - Quantum collaboration and competition in the tech world 9:23 - The quantum arms race: U.S. vs. China 10:24 - Security and investment in quantum research 11:36 - Quantum computing’s impact on encryption and cybersecurity 13:43 - The potential threat to banking and global data security 15:48 - Quantum key distribution: A defense against quantum hacking 17:06 - Real-world trials of quantum-secure communication 19:01 - China’s advancements in quantum satellite technology 19:53 - Singapore’s approach to quantum communication networks 21:42 - The challenges of geopolitics in quantum collaboration 22:53 - Conclusion: The quantum future and global collaboration
I've been designing HVAC systems for hyper-scale data centres for a couple of years now, but had to really get my nose in the books again when recently becoming involved on one of these quantum computing data centres. It is seriously interesting stuff. What a time to be alive!
@@Nite2012Mare You do not understand friend. I'm in the business of dealing with the heat that comes off data centres. But in this recent case getting liquid helium as close as possible to absolute zero (0K, typically only achieve about 2.5-4.5 K) to cool the back of the chips that will do the computing, typically also by using liquid nitrogen as a shield on the outside of the helium pipes. I know absolutely nothing about quantum entanglement, nor did I ever claim that I do. When it comes to quantum entanglement I leave that to other specialists who does understand and work with it. I'm merely concerned about making cold. Extremely cold.
I was just talking with a coworker yesterday about how we're living at a pivital point in history. Barring anything tragic, we still have 30-40 years left in our lives, so we'll get to see many fundamental moments that will start humanity down either a bright future, or some really hard times. I'm here for it, but I'm also concerned for our future because of the advent of AI and quantum computing. It's so wild to have started using computers when we had a Commodore 64 when I was a young kid to where we are in such a short amount of time. Humaniy's rise from primates to what we've become is barely a blip in time.
Every time I launch into a video that addresses quantum computing, I sincerely hope to learn something useful about it. But every time I come away feeling dumber than ever. No one can explain quantum computing. Apparently the people who work directly with it do not understand it well enough to explain how the simple addition of two numbers is performed. Very frustrating.
@@MrPLC999Exactly! I know every (high level) detail about a silicone microprocessor, how it works, and how to program it. I should be an easy person to explain quantum computing to. But it seems, like in this video, they skip over details and present it as magic! Explain how it does 1+1 like you can explain binary math and caches. All I know from this video is that I’m going to need a fridge with a dial in Kelvins! Sounds not cheap! If you saw how IBM marketed blockchain for the business about 5 years ago, this is feeling like a similar bust.
Excellent filming. The initial shot of the steel bridge is Gate-House bridge crossing over the new Croton Reservoir, off Rt-129. A popular 🚴♂️ crossing. The actual IBM facility is about 2 miles away, up the hill to RT-134. Up until a few years ago, we were able to 🚴♂️ through their roads. A small plane crashed at their facility as well, about 15 years prior. All survived. It’s a beautiful facility. Now I understand why they closed the road.
@@The_Unexplainer I still have mine, though it sits in a box with no battery in it as nowadays I use an iPhone. I would bet that it would still work if I put a battery in it.
I love Hannah Fry. I first came across her from watching the Christmas lectures filmed at the Royal Institute on RUclips. I recommend watching those if you haven't.
It is imperative that we find a way to coexist peacefully, as we share a common home and should strive for the betterment of humanity as a whole, rather than prioritizing individual countries or races.
We've been working on this for 60 years. It's hard to imagine that glacial pace paying off, but I guess everyone is pretty motivated now that we're seeing the end of Moore's Law wreaking havoc.
I think this is less about problems that can be solved and more about how real havoc could be wrought. Bye bye bitcoin. Bye bye bank accounts. Hello war.
Moores Law was flawed from day one. I knew that immediately upon hearing it. It should have been thrown out immediately, there's been arguments on it apparently for a long time.
Quantum Computing will change humanity. Hopefully, humanity will evolve enough to use the technology positively. Sadly humanity's track record isn't great.
What? "HSBC" is the "Hongkong Shanghai Bank Corp"; ...so, evidently, The Chinese own much of America. HSBC is a horrendously corrupt multi-national company, owned by China!
Whenever I hear about quantum computers and all the things needed to make them work, I'm reminded of Thomas J. Watson, chairman of IBM, who said, in 1943: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.".
@@NoLefTurnUnStoned. Hannah has just accepted a position as a Professor at Cambridge University focusing on the public understanding of mathematics, so we can expect even more content from here in the coming years.
@@RafaelRodrigues-rx9ry It's not that. The Application of quantum computer is so huge to imagine. Through it, we can get access to make materials that are well beyond our comprehension because of the fact that it can process information in a very fast and parallel way that it can even go deep down to atomic and quantum level calculations. Plus, it's also beneficial for the medical science. Through it, we can discover new type of drugs and how to synthesize it plus solving complex problems that arises with the protein and genetic coding.
Thank you for the video. However, a key detail was omitted: even though a quantum computer can consider all combinations at once (maybe), the combination you actually observe is randomly chosen. No one has yet proven a quantum computer to be equivalent to a Non-Deterministic Turing Machine.
Not an issue. The "results" are pseudo random from quantum computing, but they won't be normally distributed. They will clump on the "real" answer. So for the encryption example, the computer will give you randomly chosen possible prime numbers. But as you run the calculation, more and more of the results will be the same correct prime numbers. So instead of running the calculation once, you have to run it maybe 20 times. Still faster than 500 trillion years.
The most incredible capability that quantum computing has is the seeming unlimited ability to help people obtain research grants and investments etc. What makes it doubly impressive is that this continues to happen even though quantum computing has failed to deliver any useful product or results.
@@breakupgoogle GTA 6!!!!! OMG that is my favourite game. Imagine if we get Quantum 3310 before GTA 6. That would be heartbreaking because I love GTA6 AND I just love the joke that you pulled there.
Efforts to educate the public about quantum computing are essential. This will not only increase understanding but also foster a new generation of innovators who can push the boundaries of this technology.
This is very misleading, post-quantum cryptography (ie quantum-safe) has been around for a while and even has new standards based around it. To say quantum computing breaks all encryption is just incredibly ignorant or misleading.
Just because it's there doesn't meen it's being used, over 90% of current active technology have not implement it. One could only imagine about the cost and time needed, especially legacy systems and technology.
It does break all encryption as we know it, though. Because here is the thing: we have quantum safe encryption. How many sites are implementing quantum safe encryption ? How many security experts are there that know how to implement quantum safe encryption? Is it available in any old library across languages? I haven’t seen it. Let me push a little further and elaborate on how much trouble we might see: if most companies including credit companies use said encryption…. Why are their so many data breaches?
every mom and pop store using Visa or MasterCard will have to have a quantum safe encryption to the banking/credit card system, otherwise it might be a target for breaking encryption into the banking systems around the world
I've been hearing about Quantum computers for 30 years, and have yet to see a working example of it. This is like Fusion Energy, full of hype and fan fare with no tangible results.
@@hindugoat2302 and on what evidence do you come to that conclusion? I think you'll find there is no evidence. Sure, plenty of youtubers talk about it, but nobody has seen an actual physical demonstration of it. At some point you have to put up or shut up.
@@JXZjeremy where are these results? Other than esoteric published papers. Did you buy a new computer that runs faster using quantum processing. I'd really like to buy it.
@@JXZjeremy Theranos company showed results, examples and progress too. It was all fake, a huge scam. Be skeptical, for every real development there are 100 scammers.
No one talks about how few applications there are for Quantum Computing (aside from breaking RSA) where there is proof of a speedup compared to classical computers
@@lepidoptera9337 I'm not sure how many speedups are actually "proven". Because in many applications where people thought you would get a quantum advantage, improvements in classical algorithms / tensor networks have made it very unclear whether there is any advantage.
If we assume that the role of a QPU will remain highly specialised, even just applications in the areas of optimisation, search, QML, etc are significant. Improvements to catalysis alone, the manufacturing of chemicals, has an incredible impact in that field (and unit economics). I recently wrote a book on quantum algorithms and showcased 20 algos in the first edition as a general example, but even those are just the building blocks of what we do with them. It's an exciting time for exploration.
@@hellodavidryan A lot of the potentially groundbreaking QC applications like Accelerated Drug/ Materials discovery are already almost here thanks to ML. What are your thoughts on that?
Medical research and medicine development, cryptography, crypo mining, chemistry, quantum physics, material manufacturing, battery development, astrophysics, the list goes on. Just because you can't use it to make a tic tok, it doesn't mean there are limited applications. You need to expand your mind in order to see the true potential of QC.
Lots of "could" in this faith-based wish for quantum computing power being especially useful with all this massive parallelism. When will it become "can" and "does"?
It's similar to Fusion generators. It's part of the bleeding edge research that we know how it works for the most part, now we just need to scale it up.
Less than a hundred years ago we discovered and harnessed the power of the atom. It took thousands of years of science to get us to that point, and we're moving at an INSANE pace since then. Technology has progressed so fast in the last century comparitively that it's hard to remember that practical electrical light has only existed for less than 200 of the last 6,000 years of human civilization. We are moving at light speed technologically. We should be worried, honestly, that we're moving TOO quickly.
@@FranzBiscuit we have quantum computers NOW. We're closer than ever before to real breakthroughs in multiple fields and still you weird anti-science "informed" viewers are totally out of touch and just buy anti-science funding rhetoric hook line and sinker
That depends on your definition of "can" and "does". Today I've been running some basic circuits on a Quantinuum machine via Amazon Braket as part of a project and getting useful results. My old team at Quantum Brilliance are working on hybrid quantum-classical compute and have published some great papers around that. We're in the era of "quantum utility", and while we have a lot of work to do, progress is encouraging. It's worth taking a look at and understand where things are at, and the roadmaps around what's coming next.
The fact that we are seeing this documentary, means that they are a lot farther ahead than what they show. At the same time it could mean that they are not getting anywhere.
I wonder if they have broken standard encryption yet. If they had, they would need to keep is secret. If encryption is broken, then we cannot function online.
I saw a documentary on quantum computers that was better than this 3 years ago on RUclips…. It has gone no where. The only thing quantum computing investment has brought is more quantum computer documentaries.
3:48 Why does everyone keep repeating this maze lie? It can only tell you if some types lf mazes, for example welded trees, have an exist or not. For the example of welded trees quantum computers do have an exponential advantage however they cant recover a route from start to finish! Moreover if quantum computers could have done this for EVERY maze, then they would have been able to solve succinct s-t connectivity which is a PSPACE-Complete problem!!!
Bc they beee to extremely over simplify things for those of us who no nothing and many of us would turn off mentally if they broke it down into more detail
i was under the impression that quantum algorithms are the bottleneck, they dont offer much real world solutions? so its mostly all theoretical still? i am green on the subject however
it's the same meme repeated again and again and again. quantum computing in the next 10 years, AGI in the next 10 years, superconductor in the next 10 years, nuclear fusion in next 10 years 😂
Transistors were first described a hundred years ago, took another 20 years to be made, and another 20 after that to start becoming effective, and another 20 after that before they started becoming ubiquitous.
@@maxrinehart4177 LOL who said agi in the next 10 years, 3 years ago? Youre gaslighting BIG time. Before 2 years, people didnt even really talk that much about an "agi", and now in 2024, most experts think it will happen wothin this decade. Youre such a loser for setting up strawmen
@@jonfenick8281 Terraforming will have to be the next process that humanity improves upon. I don't want to go to Mars just yet, at least not until they build a WalMart.
the way we write codes now is to start a loop with certain conditions but I am wondering how we will write codes for quantum computers? is it gonna be same but all the computations going to be simultaneous or we write it differently
You can play with this yourself by using simulators, of course you won't get the performance benefits of Quantum computing, but you can test and run algorithms. For example, Q# is an open-source language that targets Quantum computers.
You did a great job on this video, I don’t think I have seen so many people take something complex and explain it in such an easy way. Truly exceptional work
imagine a world where you do not have to look over your shoulder and instead the whole world collaborates together for a better future without a economical agenda
2:45 Only if you program it this way, if you look at veritasium's maze robot video you will see better methods, but I'm following the logic... 3:40 This makes no sense, calculating all paths would mean many results, you would still need to determine which path is correct (with a classical function), can anyone here explain the logic of this to me?
In a normal computer, during each CPU cycle, the program evaluates a possible solution, and it may take n cycles to find the correct one. In quantum computing, due to superposition, all possible solutions are evaluated simultaneously. For example in a for loop where a classical CPU processes one iteration at a time, quantum computing processes every iteration at once. And from what I understand, that could someday help us to use conditionals like 'if solvable, then...' instead of boolean logic
@@georgecherian9586 An "if solvable" condition would be immense and save a lot of time, but I'm still without an explanation of the logic, why isn't there some step-by-step maths example that people can follow to clearly demonstrate how it works? It shouldn't be hard to write some simple code that will make any classical computer chug for long time, then show the quantum version of that code and how it performs the same task quickly. If it is massively parallel and can processes every iteration at once, why is having more qbits important? Why is processing power even a thing?
@@georgecherian9586that's just not true though? That's fundamentally not how these systems work. You were tricked by this video that's just IBM marketing.
of course there are optimizations, it's just an analogy. the point they are making is that, in the analogy, quantum is the end-all optimization - an instantaneous bruteforce.
Gotta point out the (Aqueduct) road over that cool old steel-deck bridge over the reservoir in the opening goes onto a potholed partly-dirt road (actually the left at the bridge end washed out completely in hurricane Irene) and up a steep hill before reaching IBM research and is a very much worse route than just taking the exit off the Taconic Parkway to this "secret center hidden in the hills."
If you mean end-user software, then it's not likely going to be running on Quantum computers. They're useful as a co-processor for specialized tasks, but they're not better at just providing software. If you mean, how are they programmed, then it's with specialized programming languages. Just look up "Quantum programming" on Wikipedia, it has lists there.
@johnsontan345 In Jülich germany they are trying too, in China too. Many are trying but progress so far is limited to specific use cases, not for general purpose computation
@@v2ike6udik Hum not so sure about that. So far, our insitutions are holding like economics. But i bet on mass starvation following a chain of events combining economic, climatic and geopolitic.
@@mxphys either you are blind or redefine what his happening as normal. Masspöizöning of ppl, food and land, mass freq made storms, mass stealing ppls posessions. United Govemements of Mözönic TRRRRSTS. All politics is show. it them, 1%, vs us, the slaves. Yo. Arent you aware?
Yes, the last box is open and quantum is sitting prep'd and waiting for AI to become autonomous and take over, and solve our 15 year old puzzle in a weekend. In a nut shell, we are F🎉CKED and don't even see it coming.
They already have…. Anything revealed in a video like this is old information. Be worried about what they’re doing at this moment….. you won’t know about it for some time, and when you do that too will be old news….
@@alexsnemos I would say yes. Any nation state with access to such a game changing bit of tech should be worrying to everyone. It's not like they ever have people's best interests at heart...
Solving problems with a quantum computer is like I covering a birthday cake with sprinkles and saying that somewhere in those sprinkles is the name of the birthday boy. You'd be asking for your money back from the cake shop.
They already have quantum-defeating encryption algorithms that run on regular computers and networks. NIST just made some announcement on standards for them.
If I worked at IBM, I would definitely take people to the elevator, and say "Welp, here it is" "...WOw, so...what exactly is the...." (DING......Elevator door opens....) "The elevator to the floor with the quantum computer"
She's always been so clever, who doesn't love Hannah Fry. Ha! Speaking of love. Kidding, Kidding. Only BBC 2 radio fans and some locals will get that reference since for some reason Google's algorithim can't find it. It's almost like a sneaky multitalented mathematics professor messed with the search results...
IIRC I don't believe that there have been any published cases that have held up to peer review where quantum computers have outperformed traditional computing. It makes one wonder if hype over quantum computing is a modern form of a SDI/"star wars" program intended to divert Chinese state-directed resources toward wasteful projects.
Yes, I think that's true. I would go as far to say that some of these 'commercial' quantum computer companies are complete scammers. D-Wave comes to mind, but I think there are others too. The 'hype' is about the imagined potential, rather than any current reality. It's very hard to imagine this happening anytime soon, especially not within a decade. This and agi are the hardest of problems, and I don't expect to see either any time soon. As for your 'misdirection of resources' suggestion, that's an interesting, and plausible idea. For as long as there is the possibility that it might result in a useful computing machine, then we will feel obliged to do it, but there may indeed come a time, when we have satisfied ourselves, that neither we, nor anyone else, is going to be able to do this. At that point, the ruse may continue, for the reason you state. It may even have happened already.
You use the example of Star Wars, the proposed missile defence system in orbit, as a case for something that was hyped but turned out to unachievable. Only politics prevented it, so a very bad way of trying to make a point. Another example of 'if it isnt already perfect then it isnt worth inventing' (lack of) thinking.
That's actually true, China is so behind US that there is no competition anymore, China's quantum palyers are literally competting at domestic level with each other, Europe has surpassed them as well, they would need at least 10-15 years to reach the place where U.S is today (quantum computing), and they have spent 5 times more than U.S in this field, US has now two companies with two distinctive 1,121 qbits quantum computing technologies and the 1386+ qbits systems are under development, meanwhile China is severely struggling with a high error 75 qbit system.
Nothing which makes sense. So far quantum computers can not even do 99% of what normal computers can do, and in the 1% cases they do not even outperform current digital computers. And maybe they won't ever.
@@ulrikof.2486 Actually Qubit (quantum bits) easily beat Bits (Current computer) because the processing of qubit much faster. Never underestimate the qubit process. It's still in early stage of technology which is under research by IBM. So it's no different between qubit vs bits, just how it's process between billion to trillion on and off ressistor.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
This was utterly fascinating. I’m just a truck driver. I failed CSE maths because I’m number dyslexic but I adore science. It’s the way forward for everything.
You are not “just a truck driver” you’re literally the reason why millions get what they want
Your not just a truck driver , people like you are what keeps our country moving . You hold your head up high Buddy 😊
It really is incredible stuff, isn't it? I work in I.T., and I feel an overwhelming sense of imposter syndrome when it comes to certain aspects of Computer Science...
lol you guys need to chill, hes literally just a truck driver 😂😂
@@animalnt You could've just *not* said this. I hope you're okay.
The most surprising, overwhelming and uneblievable thing in this video is "presented by Nokia".
Top tier comment😭
😂 I was also wondering
Is it the Nokia Nokia? Or a different brand also named Nokia...Because the logo looked different from what I remember.
You should really take a moment to read Wikipedia page on Nokia. You'll be surprised that it was founded in 19th century
Nokia didn't go away.
Hannah Fry has just accepted a position as a Professor at Cambridge University focusing on the public understanding of mathematics, so we can expect even more content from her in the coming years.
Public understanding of mathematics? What a waste of time, they count with their fingers!
She should work on the accuracy and correctness of her explanations.
@bluuu555 All in all it's just telly. You can't be that serious on TV.
@@Ichbinnurgutwennkeinerguckt and she is probably getting paid more than the professors who are making novel discoveries.
What a joke.
The music selection, the Frames, the host, The story telling! Everything was REALLY interesting!!
its all AI generated
Pero todo lo que dijo ya se sabía desde hace 25 años, no aportó nada nuevo.
Except the part where crooked Joe Biden was talking.
@@starsandnightvision you really think biden matters? you really think he is calling the shots?
All USA politics is equally corrupt, and the people making the decisions are not elected, but deep state.
Idiots cheering for one side or the other like it will change anything.
@@starsandnightvision if you are not crooked, you are not in american politics.
Its built on corporations donating millions to get their way on critical issues like removing regulations, removing competitors, anything to make more money
Message to a bank: "Why has my paycheck not been deposited?!"
Bank: "A cricket keeps looking at our fiber optic cables."
i wonder how many people wont even understand the joke...
doesnt matter, a cricket doesnt have 'consciousness', at least thats what bohr told me.
Love it. Explains the shear nonsense of "Quantum" BS.
@@ronin6158 Quantum doesn't care about 'consciousness' at all. It cares about interaction. I hate when people think that 'observation' means 'a person looked at it' no, 'observation' just means taking the measurement made a change. Whatever you used to get the data from the particle collapsed the wave function in that moment. Doesn't even matter if the data of the measurement was destroyed before anyone could see it, the 'observation' was taken. It is the interaction that collapses the wave form, not a consciousness.
@@ThornMu Yeah, people think that we observe things telepathically and not through beaming a ton of particles around. Which at a macro-scale does make some sense - photons don't really do anything much at a macro scale, so we think that seeing is just getting information at the distance with no consequence whatsoever. But the fact that they can't comprehend that at some point even such small particles will have an effect on another particle position / distribution in space does really peeve me.
Quantum Computing Stocks Collapsing has been projected since the second quarter of 2024. I also invested wrongly, but Vivian's professionalism is high on the stock market. Today, I am glad I didn't fall victim to the dip.
I was scorched as well, Quantum computing equities are plummeting, just as the market was surging forward. What a bittersweet twist!
Lots of people have been talking about Vivian R Campbell, wish I knew earlier than now and its never too late for me to start afresh even at this stage of loosing $300k to QBTS and RGTI.
I just looked her up on Google and I am impressed by her track record after viewing her official web page. This is what I needed! I sent an email and await her response. Thanks for sharing.
As is customary, the equities are merely market ballooning and will soon require another market to do so. They are the heads of the financial balloon so better I get it right with my portfolio now.
which ones?>
well done bloomberg. this is the most time in recent past i have paid absolute attention to a RUclips video. Absolutely captivating kudos to the crew behind this video.
You are very welcome I made this video
I was thinking the same thing... I started like 10 videos before finishing this one lol
@@carlosparra190 no way
@@ysj8256 only problem is the whole thing is a lie
One thing that was not mentioned in the video: most of the capacity of IBM supercomputers is used to start various wars in the world, to monitor and manipulate everyone in the world.
That research campus is absolutely amazing.
You mean is the definition of backrooms?
Now imagine what you do not get to see and x it by 20 and you are still nowhere close to the corruption and 🥗 greed 😮
Every time I encounter someone wetting their pants over 'the risks of AI' I ask them if they understand the risks from quantum computing.
The answer is always a puzzled "No".
All of humanity will benefit from quantum, provided humanity doesn't behave as it has been for the past few thousand years. So, best of luck with that.
As someone who’s been following Hannah since 2014, and is used to see her featured on colourful Numberphile videos, it’s quite surprising to see her in something that’s shot and edited like a Denis Villeneuve film
First time I see her, what a magical woman.
I remember her doing math equations on construction paper with sharpie.
She's done some show's on the BBC which had a decent budget.
I have the impression that this video is a presentation of the host's hair and make-up.
@@nnnnnn3647 She barely wears any makeup. And you can't blame her for being beautiful.
I work with museums to run educational shows for kids. I did some stuff on quantum for the parents and one worked for a consultantcy firm for the government. They hired me to throw together some ideas for the government.
My contribution boiled down to "if you pushed science and esp quantum to kids entering highschool when you came to power you would have a whole lot of people with PhD s in it now.
The quote didn't get used
except for the chinese kid who told his grandparents in china....
Loved the scientist answering the questions and giving the tour. Where clearly loves what she does and that's always wonderful to see.
The producers need to decide if they want to focus on slowly walking Hannah or on the Quantum stuff.
@MrBigbanan Hallelujah!
😂😂same thoughts. Cat walk=quantum stuff?
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I like them both!
They are actually in a position where they are both slowly walking Hannah, and on the Quantum stuff at the same time.
Fun fact: quantum computing hardware contains a lot of analog components, especially the physical qubits themselves. The programmed signals we use to excite a quantum device should more or less match its resonating frequency and thus typically take the form of continuous, modulated sine waves. (In other words, square waves are not suitable to excite a physical qubit, however a compatible digital-to-analog converter may be employed to generate the required resonating waveform).
The manipulation of waves in the quantum confined devices, under the right conditions, is what allows one to obtain the interference, entanglement, and superposition for the quantum experiments :)
- a quantum hardware engineer who builds quantum computers for a living
i understood none of that. thumbs up for the smiley face though :)
You mean to tell me that there are quantum dacs?
does this mean instead of emp they well be susceptible to sonic weapons?
To simplify what he typed: Analog [sine waves] devices are used because they have a range of values that can be changed / fine tuned. As opposed to digital [square waves] which are either high or low.
Imagine a digital clock vs an analog clock. Digital clocks simply display one whole number after the next, but an analog clock you can see the gradual shifting of the hands between numbers. @@success9271
@@iVilliainI have one on my hifi system. Sounds AMAZING 😎
0:00 - Introduction: IBM’s Quantum Computing Facility
0:49 - The promise and risks of quantum computing
1:53 - IBM Quantum System Two: Exploring the technology
3:14 - How quantum computers work: Superposition and qubits
4:33 - Applications of quantum computing in science and industry
5:55 - Inside IBM’s lab: The hardware and challenges
7:12 - Cooling to absolute zero: Maintaining quantum stability
8:20 - Quantum collaboration and competition in the tech world
9:23 - The quantum arms race: U.S. vs. China
10:24 - Security and investment in quantum research
11:36 - Quantum computing’s impact on encryption and cybersecurity
13:43 - The potential threat to banking and global data security
15:48 - Quantum key distribution: A defense against quantum hacking
17:06 - Real-world trials of quantum-secure communication
19:01 - China’s advancements in quantum satellite technology
19:53 - Singapore’s approach to quantum communication networks
21:42 - The challenges of geopolitics in quantum collaboration
22:53 - Conclusion: The quantum future and global collaboration
I've been designing HVAC systems for hyper-scale data centres for a couple of years now, but had to really get my nose in the books again when recently becoming involved on one of these quantum computing data centres. It is seriously interesting stuff. What a time to be alive!
SELLOUT
@@anamegoeshere are you regarded?
Designing HVAC systems is a LONG way from understanding quantum entanglement 🙄😂
@@Nite2012Mare You do not understand friend. I'm in the business of dealing with the heat that comes off data centres. But in this recent case getting liquid helium as close as possible to absolute zero (0K, typically only achieve about 2.5-4.5 K) to cool the back of the chips that will do the computing, typically also by using liquid nitrogen as a shield on the outside of the helium pipes. I know absolutely nothing about quantum entanglement, nor did I ever claim that I do. When it comes to quantum entanglement I leave that to other specialists who does understand and work with it. I'm merely concerned about making cold. Extremely cold.
I was just talking with a coworker yesterday about how we're living at a pivital point in history. Barring anything tragic, we still have 30-40 years left in our lives, so we'll get to see many fundamental moments that will start humanity down either a bright future, or some really hard times. I'm here for it, but I'm also concerned for our future because of the advent of AI and quantum computing. It's so wild to have started using computers when we had a Commodore 64 when I was a young kid to where we are in such a short amount of time. Humaniy's rise from primates to what we've become is barely a blip in time.
Quantum computing aside, this is one of the best-quality videos I have ever seen. Amazing direction, editing, post. Simply beautiful.
You need to stay in more
It’s like watching Hannah on the BBC.
Every time I launch into a video that addresses quantum computing, I sincerely hope to learn something useful about it. But every time I come away feeling dumber than ever. No one can explain quantum computing. Apparently the people who work directly with it do not understand it well enough to explain how the simple addition of two numbers is performed. Very frustrating.
@@MrPLC999 When she started talking about how nature doesn't follow rules on an atomic level I was like - what is your field again? PR?
@@MrPLC999Exactly! I know every (high level) detail about a silicone microprocessor, how it works, and how to program it. I should be an easy person to explain quantum computing to.
But it seems, like in this video, they skip over details and present it as magic! Explain how it does 1+1 like you can explain binary math and caches.
All I know from this video is that I’m going to need a fridge with a dial in Kelvins! Sounds not cheap!
If you saw how IBM marketed blockchain for the business about 5 years ago, this is feeling like a similar bust.
Excellent filming. The initial shot of the steel bridge is Gate-House bridge crossing over the new Croton Reservoir, off Rt-129. A popular 🚴♂️ crossing. The actual IBM facility is about 2 miles away, up the hill to RT-134. Up until a few years ago, we were able to 🚴♂️ through their roads. A small plane crashed at their facility as well, about 15 years prior. All survived. It’s a beautiful facility. Now I understand why they closed the road.
Please keep producing videos like this! Wow. This was phenomenal and so well documented. The world needs to check this out.
Hannah Fry is the best narrator out there 😍
Really well done video! Also, her Sweater game is on point!
Sponsored by Nokia. I would like Nokia unbreakable quantum computer
A quantum chipped Nokia phone with the old durable case, sign me up!
It was produced two decades ago, it's called Nokia 3310.
@@The_Unexplainer I still have mine, though it sits in a box with no battery in it as nowadays I use an iPhone. I would bet that it would still work if I put a battery in it.
Yes and the actual quantum chip powering the thing is my mom
If Nokia builds a Quantum Computer, I'd still use it to play Snake...
This is the only RUclips short doc I’ve ever watched that is packed with advertisements for the show I am currently watching.
what show
are you normal??
Ublock origin
You’re right, it’s strange. Many NPC replies, also strange.
RUclips Premium ftw
I love Hannah Fry. I first came across her from watching the Christmas lectures filmed at the Royal Institute on RUclips. I recommend watching those if you haven't.
Overcoming the "us against them" mentality would be the biggest breakthrough, not the quantum computers.
Just a million years of evolution to go. Hang on in there....
..true!
@@Jon.E.A Our struggle is not with the people or , oh I forget the scripture but it could be ..true!
Us vs Them is how we evolve and develop as a species. Without it we become stagnant.
I guess it's your opinion against this video on what's the biggest breakthrough
It is imperative that we find a way to coexist peacefully, as we share a common home and should strive for the betterment of humanity as a whole, rather than prioritizing individual countries or races.
Dangerous nonsense from fools, our enemies will show us no mercy and neither shall we.
@@ATRTAP its in your own head no ones your enemy
I haven’t enjoyed a video more in my life. Very insightful, and great information provided. Also love Hannah’s shirts 😁
We've been working on this for 60 years. It's hard to imagine that glacial pace paying off, but I guess everyone is pretty motivated now that we're seeing the end of Moore's Law wreaking havoc.
I think this is less about problems that can be solved and more about how real havoc could be wrought. Bye bye bitcoin. Bye bye bank accounts. Hello war.
don't forget AI now's helping... advancement is already exponential...
Buckle up.
Moores Law was flawed from day one. I knew that immediately upon hearing it. It should have been thrown out immediately, there's been arguments on it apparently for a long time.
“It’s like The Jetsons meets The Flintstones.” Two references to Hanna-Barbera cartoons! Is it any wonder Dr. Fry has such a loyal following?
More like Daphne meets Velma. 4:23
u old
Great presentation Ms. Lady! Very intriguing
Quantum Computing will change humanity.
Hopefully, humanity will evolve enough to use the technology positively.
Sadly humanity's track record isn't great.
Yea….I feel like this technology has the potential to change so many lives for the better, but human greed just gets in the way of everything :(
Not gonna happen. Human inclination has always misused innovations negeatively..errors are part of our nature. Also,power corrupts.
💯
change "humanity's" to "those in power" and your near above the target
Quantum computing started out as theoretical and still is. People just want to believe, just like make believe story books.
She is so drop dead gorgeous and that voice. My heart.
Shake & a few slaps, "get a hold of your self buddy!!" 😅
lol maybe 20 years ago
She has the calmest voice I ever heard, I'm in love
Stop imping
8:35 Do you collaborate with Chinese companies as well?
- Nope
- Ohh... Go on 🧐
Hahahahaha
What? "HSBC" is the "Hongkong Shanghai Bank Corp";
...so, evidently, The Chinese own much of America.
HSBC is a horrendously corrupt multi-national company, owned by China!
So…china?
No.
I’m listening…
😭
My understanding is that this is because whomever gets this first, it comes down to encryption/decryption.
China have 50% of the patents for the quantum computer, so you have to work with China if you want to make a quantum thing.
Prof Hannah Fry is well funny❤
I see Hannah, i press like.
Same. Feel like I haven't seen her in a while and suddenly she is everywhere, and I am SO here for it!
clever and beautiful
wasn't expecting to see her here! Great host
I see Hannah I go Hub :D
@@valtermedeiros6295 ehem ehemm
Thanks for the dubbed video!
At first I thought they were walking up to a really cool, imposing elevator. Should have named it Otis
It is an elevator
EVENT . horizon
Prof H may join
@@ecosignals From H to He.
Interesting and enlightening and the final message is on a positive note. Thank you, Hanna Fry.
Whenever I hear about quantum computers and all the things needed to make them work, I'm reminded of Thomas J. Watson, chairman of IBM, who said, in 1943: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.".
Anything with Hannah Fry in is just.........better!
My eyes were GLUED to my screen....wow just wow. What humans are capable of creating is mind blowing
I know, her parents are legends for creating such a beauty!
And the same humans created a 40 hour work week
@@krashd 💯
@@krashd 😻👏
Yet humans supposedly can't cure cancer, world hunger, homelessness and government corruption
Y'know, it just isn't the same without a British narrator. It raises the perceived quality of a documentary a thousandfold.
Great video.
Prof. Fry's intelligence is super amazing! I'm always super impressed with her knowledge in maths.
She’s a professor of maths.
@@NoLefTurnUnStoned. Hannah has just accepted a position as a Professor at Cambridge University focusing on the public understanding of mathematics, so we can expect even more content from here in the coming years.
Fascinating. Hannah Fry's content is excellent.
A brilliant presentation 🌟
We're racing to build a thing because others are racing to build a thing.
its called keeping up with the jonses
Hahahah. A thing that will not work.
tribal survival
Advancement just for the sake of advancement
@@RafaelRodrigues-rx9ry It's not that. The Application of quantum computer is so huge to imagine. Through it, we can get access to make materials that are well beyond our comprehension because of the fact that it can process information in a very fast and parallel way that it can even go deep down to atomic and quantum level calculations.
Plus, it's also beneficial for the medical science. Through it, we can discover new type of drugs and how to synthesize it plus solving complex problems that arises with the protein and genetic coding.
Thank you for the video. However, a key detail was omitted: even though a quantum computer can consider all combinations at once (maybe), the combination you actually observe is randomly chosen. No one has yet proven a quantum computer to be equivalent to a Non-Deterministic Turing Machine.
Not an issue. The "results" are pseudo random from quantum computing, but they won't be normally distributed. They will clump on the "real" answer.
So for the encryption example, the computer will give you randomly chosen possible prime numbers. But as you run the calculation, more and more of the results will be the same correct prime numbers. So instead of running the calculation once, you have to run it maybe 20 times. Still faster than 500 trillion years.
Well narrated and interesting documentary. Thank you
The most incredible capability that quantum computing has is the seeming unlimited ability to help people obtain research grants and investments etc.
What makes it doubly impressive is that this continues to happen even though quantum computing has failed to deliver any useful product or results.
A bit like string theory!
Nokia is secretly making its first Quantum 3310 phone 😬
Didn't know that Nokia ventured from telecom into the defense industry. 🤪🤪🤪
How about if the phone overheated, from absolute zero? 😅
we will get that before gta6
Gta6 gonna made by completely different people that .ade the games before anyway. @@breakupgoogle
@@breakupgoogle GTA 6!!!!! OMG that is my favourite game. Imagine if we get Quantum 3310 before GTA 6. That would be heartbreaking because I love GTA6 AND I just love the joke that you pulled there.
Efforts to educate the public about quantum computing are essential. This will not only increase understanding but also foster a new generation of innovators who can push the boundaries of this technology.
Our world is about to get crazy. Everything is so up in the air too
This is very misleading, post-quantum cryptography (ie quantum-safe) has been around for a while and even has new standards based around it. To say quantum computing breaks all encryption is just incredibly ignorant or misleading.
Just because it's there doesn't meen it's being used, over 90% of current active technology have not implement it. One could only imagine about the cost and time needed, especially legacy systems and technology.
It does break all encryption as we know it, though. Because here is the thing: we have quantum safe encryption.
How many sites are implementing quantum safe encryption ?
How many security experts are there that know how to implement quantum safe encryption?
Is it available in any old library across languages? I haven’t seen it.
Let me push a little further and elaborate on how much trouble we might see: if most companies including credit companies use said encryption…. Why are their so many data breaches?
every mom and pop store using Visa or MasterCard will have to have a quantum safe encryption to the banking/credit card system, otherwise it might be a target for breaking encryption into the banking systems around the world
@@dbreardontypically sites don't do any of the card storing or processing themselves, the payment gateway is the liable party here.
@@newolde1 But the path from the machine at the store to the gateway would need to be quantum safe encrypted or that pathway would be venerable
Excellent video very informative with charming presentation.
I've been hearing about Quantum computers for 30 years, and have yet to see a working example of it. This is like Fusion Energy, full of hype and fan fare with no tangible results.
its exponential growth
progress will be very slow at first... and then suddenly, all at once
same with AI
@@hindugoat2302 and on what evidence do you come to that conclusion? I think you'll find there is no evidence. Sure, plenty of youtubers talk about it, but nobody has seen an actual physical demonstration of it. At some point you have to put up or shut up.
And yet they show results, example and progress.
@@JXZjeremy where are these results? Other than esoteric published papers. Did you buy a new computer that runs faster using quantum processing. I'd really like to buy it.
@@JXZjeremy Theranos company showed results, examples and progress too.
It was all fake, a huge scam.
Be skeptical, for every real development there are 100 scammers.
No one talks about how few applications there are for Quantum Computing (aside from breaking RSA) where there is proof of a speedup compared to classical computers
I can see lots of applications in physics and chemistry, but those are for nerds and not for normal people.
@@lepidoptera9337 I'm not sure how many speedups are actually "proven". Because in many applications where people thought you would get a quantum advantage, improvements in classical algorithms / tensor networks have made it very unclear whether there is any advantage.
If we assume that the role of a QPU will remain highly specialised, even just applications in the areas of optimisation, search, QML, etc are significant. Improvements to catalysis alone, the manufacturing of chemicals, has an incredible impact in that field (and unit economics). I recently wrote a book on quantum algorithms and showcased 20 algos in the first edition as a general example, but even those are just the building blocks of what we do with them. It's an exciting time for exploration.
@@hellodavidryan A lot of the potentially groundbreaking QC applications like Accelerated Drug/ Materials discovery are already almost here thanks to ML. What are your thoughts on that?
Medical research and medicine development, cryptography, crypo mining, chemistry, quantum physics, material manufacturing, battery development, astrophysics, the list goes on. Just because you can't use it to make a tic tok, it doesn't mean there are limited applications. You need to expand your mind in order to see the true potential of QC.
Brilliant !
Lots of "could" in this faith-based wish for quantum computing power being especially useful with all this massive parallelism. When will it become "can" and "does"?
It's similar to Fusion generators. It's part of the bleeding edge research that we know how it works for the most part, now we just need to scale it up.
Less than a hundred years ago we discovered and harnessed the power of the atom. It took thousands of years of science to get us to that point, and we're moving at an INSANE pace since then. Technology has progressed so fast in the last century comparitively that it's hard to remember that practical electrical light has only existed for less than 200 of the last 6,000 years of human civilization. We are moving at light speed technologically. We should be worried, honestly, that we're moving TOO quickly.
It's the same old story: "quantum computing is just 30 years away"™.
@@FranzBiscuit we have quantum computers NOW. We're closer than ever before to real breakthroughs in multiple fields and still you weird anti-science "informed" viewers are totally out of touch and just buy anti-science funding rhetoric hook line and sinker
That depends on your definition of "can" and "does". Today I've been running some basic circuits on a Quantinuum machine via Amazon Braket as part of a project and getting useful results. My old team at Quantum Brilliance are working on hybrid quantum-classical compute and have published some great papers around that. We're in the era of "quantum utility", and while we have a lot of work to do, progress is encouraging. It's worth taking a look at and understand where things are at, and the roadmaps around what's coming next.
The fact that we are seeing this documentary, means that they are a lot farther ahead than what they show. At the same time it could mean that they are not getting anywhere.
It’s in between the lines. Qubits are very expensive and currently they can only maintain about a minute of superposition (that we know of)
And it also means China has probably infiltrated this laboratory all ready. Kinda like the Fusion Race.
They NEED our consent…and donors.
I wonder if they have broken standard encryption yet. If they had, they would need to keep is secret. If encryption is broken, then we cannot function online.
I saw a documentary on quantum computers that was better than this 3 years ago on RUclips…. It has gone no where. The only thing quantum computing investment has brought is more quantum computer documentaries.
Fascinating!!! I really enjoyed learning from this video.
3:48 Why does everyone keep repeating this maze lie?
It can only tell you if some types lf mazes, for example welded trees, have an exist or not. For the example of welded trees quantum computers do have an exponential advantage however they cant recover a route from start to finish!
Moreover if quantum computers could have done this for EVERY maze, then they would have been able to solve succinct s-t connectivity which is a PSPACE-Complete problem!!!
Bc they beee to extremely over simplify things for those of us who no nothing and many of us would turn off mentally if they broke it down into more detail
Exactly, that's what I was thinking too.
i was under the impression that quantum algorithms are the bottleneck, they dont offer much real world solutions? so its mostly all theoretical still? i am green on the subject however
@@devilsolution9781 "i am green on the subject however" you very much are
@@bobfake3831 care to expand on that answer? what real world problems are quantum computers being used for?
16:40 That quantum key distribution by Andrew Shields is certified insane.
Absolutely and elegantly genius
@@sxyjay Yeah, straight out of a sci-fi movie.
Mmm
Nice work keep it up ❤
Year 15 of being told about quantum computing, it’s a very slow, cold race
it's the same meme repeated again and again and again. quantum computing in the next 10 years, AGI in the next 10 years, superconductor in the next 10 years, nuclear fusion in next 10 years 😂
the coldest race in the universe 🧐?
Until it's not
Transistors were first described a hundred years ago, took another 20 years to be made, and another 20 after that to start becoming effective, and another 20 after that before they started becoming ubiquitous.
@@maxrinehart4177 LOL who said agi in the next 10 years, 3 years ago? Youre gaslighting BIG time. Before 2 years, people didnt even really talk that much about an "agi", and now in 2024, most experts think it will happen wothin this decade. Youre such a loser for setting up strawmen
AGI+NueraLink+QuantumComputing=Beam_Me_Up_Scotty!
resistance is futile
@@jonfenick8281 I know! I can't wait to live in a sci-fi world!
@@jonfenick8281 Terraforming will have to be the next process that humanity improves upon. I don't want to go to Mars just yet, at least not until they build a WalMart.
Fantastic update, Qutom
What, nokia sponsored this video
They own Bell Labs now
Nokia only quit the phone market. They are still very active in other tech spaces, keep up with tech trends more my man you're outdated.
Do you collaborate with Chinese companies?no… Go on🤨
That had me laughing 🤣 like yo😂
why would anyone do that?
@@bdub1934 the Chinese can do it themselves and would probably be better just like the EV wars.
Look at the people working at the company 😂
@@honeyvee8389probably they won’t be better. Look at their attempts to match TSMC chips. They poured tons of money and failed.
because of US sanction laws against china
Brilliant piece 👌👌👍
the way we write codes now is to start a loop with certain conditions but I am wondering how we will write codes for quantum computers? is it gonna be same but all the computations going to be simultaneous or we write it differently
Yes, in the maze example, is this just parallelism? Like, you build every path at the same time - but you still have to build them... ?
The way we write code for quantum computers is indeed quite different from classical programming
You can play with this yourself by using simulators, of course you won't get the performance benefits of Quantum computing, but you can test and run algorithms.
For example, Q# is an open-source language that targets Quantum computers.
You did a great job on this video, I don’t think I have seen so many people take something complex and explain it in such an easy way. Truly exceptional work
imagine a world where you do not have to look over your shoulder and instead the whole world collaborates together for a better future without a economical agenda
This beautiful lady can explain complex topics so simply, that even I can understand it. Love these videos!
2:45 Only if you program it this way, if you look at veritasium's maze robot video you will see better methods, but I'm following the logic... 3:40 This makes no sense, calculating all paths would mean many results, you would still need to determine which path is correct (with a classical function), can anyone here explain the logic of this to me?
In a normal computer, during each CPU cycle, the program evaluates a possible solution, and it may take n cycles to find the correct one. In quantum computing, due to superposition, all possible solutions are evaluated simultaneously. For example in a for loop where a classical CPU processes one iteration at a time, quantum computing processes every iteration at once.
And from what I understand, that could someday help us to use conditionals like 'if solvable, then...' instead of boolean logic
@@georgecherian9586 An "if solvable" condition would be immense and save a lot of time, but I'm still without an explanation of the logic, why isn't there some step-by-step maths example that people can follow to clearly demonstrate how it works? It shouldn't be hard to write some simple code that will make any classical computer chug for long time, then show the quantum version of that code and how it performs the same task quickly.
If it is massively parallel and can processes every iteration at once, why is having more qbits important? Why is processing power even a thing?
@@georgecherian9586that's just not true though? That's fundamentally not how these systems work. You were tricked by this video that's just IBM marketing.
of course there are optimizations, it's just an analogy. the point they are making is that, in the analogy, quantum is the end-all optimization - an instantaneous bruteforce.
Path 42 is always the best path to take. We have known THAT for a very long time.
Great produciton, feels like a movie almost.
Gotta point out the (Aqueduct) road over that cool old steel-deck bridge over the reservoir in the opening goes onto a potholed partly-dirt road (actually the left at the bridge end washed out completely in hurricane Irene) and up a steep hill before reaching IBM research and is a very much worse route than just taking the exit off the Taconic Parkway to this "secret center hidden in the hills."
@@bcwbcw3741 just to set the scene I guess
Check out the series DEVS
yeah, i expect production this slick for imperial core propaganda. transparent af
What does the software look like? Why does no one ever talk about how these machines are implemented?
If you mean end-user software, then it's not likely going to be running on Quantum computers. They're useful as a co-processor for specialized tasks, but they're not better at just providing software. If you mean, how are they programmed, then it's with specialized programming languages. Just look up "Quantum programming" on Wikipedia, it has lists there.
there is no software as of now, all this hype is just a toy or prototype quantum computer not a fully functional one.
There are many companies working on it. I recently visited one in Australia called Q-Ctrl.
@johnsontan345 In Jülich germany they are trying too, in China too. Many are trying but progress so far is limited to specific use cases, not for general purpose computation
Proprietary information
Marvelously well told story.
It's always the same story : Pandora's box. Someday, we will open one that will be our last one.
❤
that box is already opened. you are watchin the end game, another planned reset of humankind.
@@v2ike6udik Hum not so sure about that. So far, our insitutions are holding like economics. But i bet on mass starvation following a chain of events combining economic, climatic and geopolitic.
@@mxphys either you are blind or redefine what his happening as normal. Masspöizöning of ppl, food and land, mass freq made storms, mass stealing ppls posessions. United Govemements of Mözönic TRRRRSTS. All politics is show. it them, 1%, vs us, the slaves. Yo. Arent you aware?
Yes, the last box is open and quantum is sitting prep'd and waiting for AI to become autonomous and take over, and solve our 15 year old puzzle in a weekend. In a nut shell, we are F🎉CKED and don't even see it coming.
Let me know when somebody leaves the starting block in this race. Until then I’ll be napping.
Hmmm, in QC someone has always left the starting block AND no one has started at the same time ...... hahahahahahaah
They already have…. Anything revealed in a video like this is old information. Be worried about what they’re doing at this moment….. you won’t know about it for some time, and when you do that too will be old news….
Very informative. Nice job Hannah Fry.
Sabine Hossenfelder disliked this video twice :D
The notion of the US leading any critical technology with security implication is concerning.
explain why?
the notion of anyone leading any critical technology alone with security implication is concerning
@@kasonnara you initially stated US which then replaced with anyone.... So am I to understand that you would be bothered if China led too?
@@alexsnemos I would say yes. Any nation state with access to such a game changing bit of tech should be worrying to everyone. It's not like they ever have people's best interests at heart...
@@alexsnemos "initially" you are speaking of another persons comment. one said it generally, the other specified US.
Fantastic show! Amazing work, everyone. I could spend all day enjoying your videos.
3:33 The maze example is such bs, a clear indication that neither Bloomberg nor Hannah have even a basic idea about how this works.
Hannah is incredibly brilliant. I have been watching her teach math & physics for years. What are your credentials?
quantumly first
Nice one
Subscribed! Very well put together information and how exciting the future is…
Solving problems with a quantum computer is like I covering a birthday cake with sprinkles and saying that somewhere in those sprinkles is the name of the birthday boy. You'd be asking for your money back from the cake shop.
They already have quantum-defeating encryption algorithms that run on regular computers and networks. NIST just made some announcement on standards for them.
it's easy to defeat your opponent when he didn't arrive
Excellent ibfo Mam
If I worked at IBM, I would definitely take people to the elevator, and say
"Welp, here it is"
"...WOw, so...what exactly is the...."
(DING......Elevator door opens....)
"The elevator to the floor with the quantum computer"
She's always been so clever, who doesn't love Hannah Fry. Ha! Speaking of love. Kidding, Kidding. Only BBC 2 radio fans and some locals will get that reference since for some reason Google's algorithim can't find it. It's almost like a sneaky multitalented mathematics professor messed with the search results...
Well done!
IIRC I don't believe that there have been any published cases that have held up to peer review where quantum computers have outperformed traditional computing. It makes one wonder if hype over quantum computing is a modern form of a SDI/"star wars" program intended to divert Chinese state-directed resources toward wasteful projects.
Yes, I think that's true. I would go as far to say that some of these 'commercial' quantum computer companies are complete scammers. D-Wave comes to mind, but I think there are others too.
The 'hype' is about the imagined potential, rather than any current reality. It's very hard to imagine this happening anytime soon, especially not within a decade. This and agi are the hardest of problems, and I don't expect to see either any time soon.
As for your 'misdirection of resources' suggestion, that's an interesting, and plausible idea. For as long as there is the possibility that it might result in a useful computing machine, then we will feel obliged to do it, but there may indeed come a time, when we have satisfied ourselves, that neither we, nor anyone else, is going to be able to do this. At that point, the ruse may continue, for the reason you state. It may even have happened already.
You use the example of Star Wars, the proposed missile defence system in orbit, as a case for something that was hyped but turned out to unachievable. Only politics prevented it, so a very bad way of trying to make a point. Another example of 'if it isnt already perfect then it isnt worth inventing' (lack of) thinking.
@@wildwizard8884 It wasn't politics, the system was impossible at the time, and is still immensely impractical today.
The end of Bitcoin
Or a new one
Thanks. Excelent point.
Looks like China vs China 😂
In science, there is no boundary. For the record, seems like only US drawing all the lines
That's actually true, China is so behind US that there is no competition anymore, China's quantum palyers are literally competting at domestic level with each other, Europe has surpassed them as well, they would need at least 10-15 years to reach the place where U.S is today (quantum computing), and they have spent 5 times more than U.S in this field, US has now two companies with two distinctive 1,121 qbits quantum computing technologies and the 1386+ qbits systems are under development, meanwhile China is severely struggling with a high error 75 qbit system.
An unlimited budget means nothing if you can't hire the talent.
@@JigilJigilnot true
What would AI be like with quantum computing?
spray started, there is a startup creating AI chip in quantum scale
The born of Skynet
Nothing which makes sense. So far quantum computers can not even do 99% of what normal computers can do, and in the 1% cases they do not even outperform current digital computers. And maybe they won't ever.
@@ulrikof.2486 Actually Qubit (quantum bits) easily beat Bits (Current computer) because the processing of qubit much faster. Never underestimate the qubit process. It's still in early stage of technology which is under research by IBM. So it's no different between qubit vs bits, just how it's process between billion to trillion on and off ressistor.
Excellent, thank you.
Quantum supremacy is close, as close as fusion.
Possibly. But you don't actually KNOW that, do you?
@@wildwizard8884I dont need to know since I don't pocket investor money or grants.
@@utkuannothing was built in a day, it takes decades.
Nokia's engineering quantum physics? Is Mcdonalds sending troops to iraq now too?
tell me you know nothing about communications technology without telling me
@@reanimationxp I'm engaging in a lobotomy as we speak I know nothing at all actually
Burger king is Americas tactical junk food of choice
No reply. just a blank stare :I Incredible.