for people interested in this subject fermilab has a relatively large channel here on youtube. they go one step further than this documentary while avoiding the heavy math.
@@donlouden8850 that kind of depends on you and what you're interested in. you can go to the channel and sort videos by popular then check out whatever catches your eye. youtube doesn't allow links.
I can't believe I never saw BBC The Sky at Night hosted by Patrick Moore on USA TV. I heard about the show when it was in the news he got sick from eating a goose egg. You can re live the old Mariner and Viking and other missions by watching that show.
What I find fascinating, are the instruments used to detect all the particles!!! Let alone the discovery of the particals themselves. To simply put it, WOW!!! Just simply WOW!
@@davidirizarry6216Consider what is the FOURTH dimension. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. This explains E=MC2 AND F=ma. This CLEARLY explains the cosmological redshift. I have CLEARLY solved what is the coronal heating “problem”. Consider what is the FOURTH dimension, as two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED. Consider what is the man (AND what is THE EYE) who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground !!!! (Touch AND feeling BLEND.) Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia, as SPACE is electromagnetic/gravitational on/in balance. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON/IN BALANCE. Consistent with what are E=MC2 AND F=ma, gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS TIME dilation is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE. Great. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) This CLEARLY proves what is THE FOURTH dimension (ON BALANCE). Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, as gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS WHAT IS THE MOON will (and does) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground. Now, notice what is the BLUE sky. Complete combustion is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2. CLEARLY, I have proven what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent !!!! (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) By Frank Martin DiMeglio
What a beautiful documentary. Thank you, Nova for enlightening the world with these beautiful scientific discoveries. We are learning more about our world and with new discoveries come more question. That's the beauty of science.
If a neutrino has mass then it is subject to gravity. "Dark matter" is therefore the NEUTRINO ATMOSPHERE of galaxies, and no longer a mystery. What a relief!
Even optimistic mass of neutrinos put the total mass of these ghost particles to about the same as all the stars. Probably smaller. Anyway much smaller than dark matter. But good idea.
@@mikkel715 I hope you included the original neutrinos created at the point of, and following, the singularity. Our arrow of time, and our causality, and our original neutrinos, were powered by antimatter creation, from our point of view. Neutrinos are good at hanging about in the cosmos. Not perfect, but good . . . but big galaxy-sized black holes are still stuffed with them.
Saying particles interact with each other perpetuates a model so oversimplified its limiting. What is described in the standard model are discrete patterns of excitation of quantum fields. Most quantum fields interact with each other, some dont. Trying to explain everything with point-like representations of those fields is silly. As we perceive them, they are only the final result of field interactions we do not perceive. Like describing what's happening in the cpu of a computer only looking at a handful of the screen's pixels, at random intervals.
36:00 - "Throughout the 1950s and '60, clues from experiments performed at CERN, alongside Fermilab..." Uhh... ground wasn't broken at Fermilab until the end of 1968, and the Main Ring accelerator wasn't fully operational until 1972.
“Fermilab - originally called the National Accelerator Laboratory - began operations in Illinois on June 15, 1967. “ From CERN official website: “On 17 May 1954, the first shovel of earth was dug on the Meyrin site in Switzerland under the eyes of Geneva officials and members of CERN staff.” “The 600 MeV Synchrocyclotron (SC), built in 1957, was CERN’s first accelerator. It provided beams for CERN’s first experiments in particle and nuclear physics.” “The Proton Synchrotron (PS) accelerated protons for the first time on 24 November 1959, becoming for a brief period the world’s highest energy particle accelerator.”
The most obvious question about Bruno Pontecorvo, not answered in the documentary, was did did regret defecting. Googling that question brought me to an interview with his son Tito in Physics Today. Although Bruno never told his children whether he regretted defecting, his son made it clear that his father hated the Soviet Union but was prevented from leaving by his communist bosses. According to Tito, Bruno naively thought he would be allowed to travel. Based on this article, Bruno must have regretted defecting soon after he entered the Soviet Union.
I stayed up to watch this!!! Damn I love science. I am always a excited dork over this sort of thing, as well as the new telescope, and quantum physics. I think to myself, we are alive to see all this awsome things happen and discovering new things!!! 😎🤓😏😀. Dewey L
Atom bomb is exciting? What you are talking about? People are totally blind. Chemistry is also pesticides, meds, plastic trash. Medicine is Pharm industry and experiments on the animals, plants and people...
The Firesign Theater, on an album that came out in the '70s, did a spoof of noir detective stories titled "The Case of the Missing Neutrino" -- which I haven't heard in well over 40 frigging years. I wonder if it's here on RUclips somewhere . . . ?
You should read more about what science is. Everything in science is always contingent on the result of the next experiment. See if you can get through the book The Structure of Scientific Revolution, You will be more informed than 99.5% of humans. Thesis, antithesis, consensus. Thomas Kuhn.
Phrases like "violates all laws of physics" are pure clickbait. Others are "amazing discovery" and "turns science upside down," but there are too many to list.
9/10 times ur theories are wrong not the laws, it is very very very very rare that established laws are wrong, but if u manage to do it u will become world famous, and there's a Nobel prize for u, good luck.
Is it possible to see Neutrinos with the naked eye? How did they see them in the first place? and how big are these Neutrinos size? What powers the Neutrinos?
The quest to understand neutrinos often dubbed "particles unknown" is one of the most intriguing challenges in modern physics. Neutrinos are incredibly elusive, interacting very weakly with matter, which makes them difficult to detect despite their abundance in the universe. They play a crucial role in processes such as stellar nucleosynthesis and supernova explosions. By studying neutrinos, scientists aim to uncover more about fundamental particle physics, the mechanisms of energy production in stars, and even the nature of dark matter. What are the most significant challenges in detecting and studying neutrinos, and how have recent advancements in technology and experimental methods improved our ability to understand these elusive particles? Additionally, what could discoveries about neutrinos reveal about the fundamental forces and particles that govern the universe?
Super-K is really Super-Kamiokande. I was friendly with Frank Close until I disclosed to him why I believe that nuclear fusion belongs in the sun and not on earth. That has to do with Goldhaber and Teller’s giant dipole resonance and the energies released in the fusion process
He claimed not to understand what I meant by fusion being dirtier than fission as a result. There’s a publication in there if it can be quantified. Maybe even a doctoral dissertation
this documentary is really impressive and the visuals are stunning! however, i can't help but feel that the focus on neutrinos might overshadow other fascinating particle physics topics that deserve more attention. what do you all think?
The most exciting things would be to learn to talk to the messenger and also to learn dark matter and what is it and gravity. Both mind boggle me just how amazing they are. Wish I could live long enough to see the day science discovers these things. May be different generations from now. Or the near future. But would be so satisfying to reach source.
I'm confused about the claim that something that is massless cannot oscillate. Doesn't light oscillate? And isn't light massless? I don't understand...
Quantum mechanics, not the theory of relativity or the passage of time, actually explains this. Oscillation is a phenomenon specific to quantum mechanics.
If you consider the universe is full of neutrinos, photons, radiation and gravity waves all mixed together for billions of years I'd expect some interaction between all these different things. Dark mater and dark energy could be the result of these interactions. Since we just discovered the Higgs boson and didn't even know it might exist 75 years ago I'll bet ther's more to the story than we can even imagine!
If the smallest particle can be divided into smaller ones, it was wrong to calling it the Atom. This was just a bluff to make their stuff sound more futuristic.
Making balance between entangled strings cross points to each other of energy so some energy loses to fulfill others and just we will give those cross points name as particles but it’s specific designed pattern to observe
Interesting ramification of the mass of the neutrino is, if we can create instrumentation for neutrinos sufficient we will be able to probe gravity at a particle level using the neutrinos. Of course these instruments are probably 10 to 20 years away but eventually the secrets of gravity at a quantum level will be revealed.
I've recorded them, I've trained myself to see them. It comes in 4 forms, most of the time very active sometimes vibrating what appears to be very slowly but in reality it's extremely fast.
When it is discovered that neutrinos are massless, even though they oscillate, standard particle physics will need to be rewritten once again because of this elusive particle. The neutrino will simply laugh and say, "Try to catch me".
If dark matter exists, shouldn't we have plenty of it right here, on earth, around earth, etc? Is it only in certain spots in the universe? Why wouldn't it basically be everywhere if it is 80 or 90% of everything that exists as they said in this video?
I loved Nova but on USA TV never saw BBC The Sky at Night show hosted by Patrick Moore. All the old Mariner, Viking and other Missions will have Sky At Night shows which cover them.
Paul Pantone inventor jailed has the GEET fuel processor that transmutates the elements releasing the neutron and quantum particles that shield you from inertia
Well, considering that it’s been proven that antimatter exists, why not anti-neutrinos? Each flavor would have its opposite. That would certainly make a lot more sense, now wouldn’t it? You don’t have to try and shoehorn in a fourth particle when all you need is three other particles who are exact opposites of the detectable Lutrin’s.
I want to say that somewhere I heard that a supernova happening somewhere in the Milky Way galaxy would set off our neutrino detectors , maybe shortly after we saw the flash of the supernova .
Close. We’d detect the neutrinos first. They’d leave the collapsing core and sail through the rest of the star, virtually unimpeded. Meanwhile the shockwave from the collapsing core, that tears the star apart, would take as much as an hour or two to reach the surface. Only at that point would the supernova become apparent visually.
That's going to be interesting - our neutrino detectors going nuts , giving us a heads up that a supernova has happened somewhere . And we are building these detectors thanks to the theorists like Fermi and Pauli , and also to the experimenters like Raines , Cowans , and that other guy . Pretty interesting !
I'm an amateur astronomer. If there's a supernova, the gravity waves and neutrinos from the explosion would arrive a few hours before the light does. I'm signed up to get an alert if there is a simultaneous detection of gravity waves and neutrinos from the same direction.
@colincampbell767 : What a spectacular and dramatic confirmation of several current theories THAT would be - amateur astronomers like you being alerted that the flash of a supernova is imminent ! Everyone contributing - the theorists with their calculations , predicting the existence of neutrinos and gravity waves , and the experimenters building the instruments to observe them . Very exciting . You amateur supernova hunters are making a major contribution , like Koichi Itagaki in Japan when he found the supernova in the " pinwheel galaxy " last May . But that one happened 21 million years ago , so perhaps too far to set off neutrino and gravity wave alarms way over here !
Dark matter... fluctuations in the higgs field creating gravity, artifically presumably. We can not detect this field directly and thus, cant tell if its particles or just fluctuations of the field.
I wish they would explain why and how they figured it out, instead they just say they did an experiment, and they discovered this and that. But give no details, wish they would give some high-level info on how they figured something out. (For instance, they say this physicist determined neutrinos can change flavors. How did he figure that out???)
for people interested in this subject fermilab has a relatively large channel here on youtube. they go one step further than this documentary while avoiding the heavy math.
Even Bananas
@@SolaceEasy Thank you, sheepshotguns42
So Complicated and Absolutely Fascinating 💚💫💙💥💜
@@donlouden8850 that kind of depends on you and what you're interested in. you can go to the channel and sort videos by popular then check out whatever catches your eye. youtube doesn't allow links.
Cool - thanks! ❤️✌️
NOVA has been on TV since 1974 and I have watched every single one I've ever come across since I was a child. They never disappoint.
I can't believe I never saw BBC The Sky at Night hosted by Patrick Moore on USA TV. I heard about the show when it was in the news he got sick from eating a goose egg. You can re live the old Mariner and Viking and other missions by watching that show.
What I find fascinating, are the instruments used to detect all the particles!!! Let alone the discovery of the particals themselves.
To simply put it, WOW!!! Just simply WOW!
The instruments they use are just as fascinating as the discovery itself..⚛️.
@@davidirizarry6216Consider what is the FOURTH dimension. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. This explains E=MC2 AND F=ma. This CLEARLY explains the cosmological redshift. I have CLEARLY solved what is the coronal heating “problem”. Consider what is the FOURTH dimension, as two AND three dimensional SPACE are BALANCED. Consider what is the man (AND what is THE EYE) who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground !!!! (Touch AND feeling BLEND.) Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia, as SPACE is electromagnetic/gravitational on/in balance. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON/IN BALANCE. Consistent with what are E=MC2 AND F=ma, gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS TIME dilation is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE. Great. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) This CLEARLY proves what is THE FOURTH dimension (ON BALANCE). Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, as gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS WHAT IS THE MOON will (and does) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground. Now, notice what is the BLUE sky. Complete combustion is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2. CLEARLY, I have proven what is the fourth dimension. Magnificent !!!! (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.)
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
I think is not particles it is a stages...
Brain food YUMMY!
Thank you Nova/PBS. Always serving up something good.
junk food, increasingly so
A neutron walks into a bar and orders a beer. He asks the bartender "What do I owe you?" The bartender says, "For you, no charge."
😂
Never trust an atom ~ they make up everything!
A bit cliche, but
enjoyable.
He's revered.
1 up Quark, 2 down Quark, carry on, Baryon, get your Hadron!
As always, another excellent NOVA episode. Thank you PBS!
I am currently working on a gauge that measures nothing but I am having trouble calibrating it. Great video.
That's because there is no nothing!
@@RO-uz4oi then we should be able to detect it.
LOL! Great comment for this video measuring REALLY subtle nonthings!
After death goes everyone in dark world
Neutrinos would be a good name for a science-themed pizza restaurant.
😎🤙
Come to Lead, SD. There's a neutrino lab here .. and a place called Pizza Lab! lol
I like that!!!👌👍
Neutriños - tilde for the steam on top.
Neutrinos pizzeria, featuring tiny Hamburger pieces (Neutrinos), cheese (atoms?)
What a beautiful documentary. Thank you, Nova for enlightening the world with these beautiful scientific discoveries. We are learning more about our world and with new discoveries come more question. That's the beauty of science.
"Right Now on ..." "NOVA" " !! Consistently the best Docs along with Frontline.
If a neutrino has mass then it is subject to gravity. "Dark matter" is therefore the NEUTRINO ATMOSPHERE of galaxies, and no longer a mystery. What a relief!
Even optimistic mass of neutrinos put the total mass of these ghost particles to about the same as all the stars. Probably smaller. Anyway much smaller than dark matter.
But good idea.
@@mikkel715 I hope you included the original neutrinos created at the point of, and following, the singularity. Our arrow of time, and our causality, and our original neutrinos, were powered by antimatter creation, from our point of view. Neutrinos are good at hanging about in the cosmos. Not perfect, but good . . . but big galaxy-sized black holes are still stuffed with them.
@@tonyduncan9852 Yes, even included the massless neutrinos into the equation..
@@mikkel715 Well then we're missing something else as well. That singularity . . .
Props to the editor. This takes something interesting and elevates it. Great work. Ian Strang and Henry Fraser. o7.
Saying particles interact with each other perpetuates a model so oversimplified its limiting. What is described in the standard model are discrete patterns of excitation of quantum fields. Most quantum fields interact with each other, some dont. Trying to explain everything with point-like representations of those fields is silly. As we perceive them, they are only the final result of field interactions we do not perceive. Like describing what's happening in the cpu of a computer only looking at a handful of the screen's pixels, at random intervals.
Thank you so much PBS. I love Nova and have watched it since I was a kid. I learn so much! 😊❤❤
Simply fabulous. *_"Wu Li Masters"_*_ are jumping more than ever!_
thanks so much ...
36:00 - "Throughout the 1950s and '60, clues from experiments performed at CERN, alongside Fermilab..."
Uhh... ground wasn't broken at Fermilab until the end of 1968, and the Main Ring accelerator wasn't fully operational until 1972.
“Fermilab - originally called the National Accelerator Laboratory - began operations in Illinois on June 15, 1967. “
From CERN official website:
“On 17 May 1954, the first shovel of earth was dug on the Meyrin site in Switzerland under the eyes of Geneva officials and members of CERN staff.”
“The 600 MeV Synchrocyclotron (SC), built in 1957, was CERN’s first accelerator. It provided beams for CERN’s first experiments in particle and nuclear physics.”
“The Proton Synchrotron (PS) accelerated protons for the first time on 24 November 1959, becoming for a brief period the world’s highest energy particle accelerator.”
home.cern/about/who-we-are/our-history
0:45 “…and astonishing experiments that keep defying the laws of physics.”
Uh no. Literally, the opposite.
The most obvious question about Bruno Pontecorvo, not answered in the documentary, was did did regret defecting. Googling that question brought me to an interview with his son Tito in Physics Today. Although Bruno never told his children whether he regretted defecting, his son made it clear that his father hated the Soviet Union but was prevented from leaving by his communist bosses. According to Tito, Bruno naively thought he would be allowed to travel. Based on this article, Bruno must have regretted defecting soon after he entered the Soviet Union.
For a scientist, the best reward is getting the resources he needs to do research and the Soviet Union gave him that. Travelling is secondary.
Scientists was kidnapped or bombed, they have no choice. In Russia free choice never exists!
⚓️ Thanks PBS 🌈
NOVA! YOU GUYS HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO CREATE ONE OF THE BEST SPACE DOC TO SLEEP" CHANNELS ON RUclips RIGHT NOW!
Mind BLOWN!!!
I’m first! Let the learning begin.
First? You proud of that? Why?
What a cool and nicely done video. bravo to NOVA!
I stayed up to watch this!!! Damn I love science. I am always a excited dork over this sort of thing, as well as the new telescope, and quantum physics. I think to myself, we are alive to see all this awsome things happen and discovering new things!!! 😎🤓😏😀. Dewey L
Atom bomb is exciting? What you are talking about? People are totally blind. Chemistry is also pesticides, meds, plastic trash. Medicine is Pharm industry and experiments on the animals, plants and people...
So many new physicists to follow!
Using Time as a component; Past Neutrino, Present Neutrino & Future Neutrino. The oscillating factors of the Neutrino.
I'm glad that Ray Davis is getting the recognition he deserves.
He helped work out all the kinks.
best narrator ever.
Этот канал действительно шарит в арбитраже. Всегда интересно смотреть
The Firesign Theater, on an album that came out in the '70s, did a spoof of noir detective stories titled "The Case of the Missing Neutrino" -- which I haven't heard in well over 40 frigging years. I wonder if it's here on RUclips somewhere . . . ?
No anchovies? I'm sorry, I spell my name 'Danger'.
Nova is always such a great show!!!
Why are lasers representing neutrinos?
Original air date: October 6, 2021
How many neutrinos would a gravity drive output?
So do neutrinos have mass or not?
Well all this brought tears to my eyes.
Honest to god!
Thanks for the free episode of Nova. 👍.
If things keep violating the laws of physics, doesn’t that mean the laws are wrong? Or is that just unimaginable…
It means we are expanding our understanding to a next level; like adding time as a fourth dimension.
You should read more about what science is. Everything in science is always contingent on the result of the next experiment. See if you can get through the book The Structure of Scientific Revolution, You will be more informed than 99.5% of humans. Thesis, antithesis, consensus. Thomas Kuhn.
Phrases like "violates all laws of physics" are pure clickbait. Others are "amazing discovery" and "turns science upside down," but there are too many to list.
Now, you have me questioning reality. I never thought of it this way. Great question.
9/10 times ur theories are wrong not the laws, it is very very very very rare that established laws are wrong, but if u manage to do it u will become world famous, and there's a Nobel prize for u, good luck.
Is it possible to see Neutrinos with the naked eye? How did they see them in the first place? and how big are these Neutrinos size? What powers the Neutrinos?
The quest to understand neutrinos often dubbed "particles unknown" is one of the most intriguing challenges in modern physics. Neutrinos are incredibly elusive, interacting very weakly with matter, which makes them difficult to detect despite their abundance in the universe. They play a crucial role in processes such as stellar nucleosynthesis and supernova explosions. By studying neutrinos, scientists aim to uncover more about fundamental particle physics, the mechanisms of energy production in stars, and even the nature of dark matter.
What are the most significant challenges in detecting and studying neutrinos, and how have recent advancements in technology and experimental methods improved our ability to understand these elusive particles? Additionally, what could discoveries about neutrinos reveal about the fundamental forces and particles that govern the universe?
PROGRESS FOR THE BETTER AND BEST YET TO COME,,,,,,,,,,
Super-K is really Super-Kamiokande. I was friendly with Frank Close until I disclosed to him why I believe that nuclear fusion belongs in the sun and not on earth. That has to do with Goldhaber and Teller’s giant dipole resonance and the energies released in the fusion process
He claimed not to understand what I meant by fusion being dirtier than fission as a result. There’s a publication in there if it can be quantified. Maybe even a doctoral dissertation
this documentary is really impressive and the visuals are stunning! however, i can't help but feel that the focus on neutrinos might overshadow other fascinating particle physics topics that deserve more attention. what do you all think?
Cool Worlds channel has a great video on how neutrinos might stop nuclear bombs. Might. 😃
The most exciting things would be to learn to talk to the messenger and also to learn dark matter and what is it and gravity. Both mind boggle me just how amazing they are. Wish I could live long enough to see the day science discovers these things. May be different generations from now. Or the near future. But would be so satisfying to reach source.
I think of all the hours and hours of sacrifice that goes into research.
Fascinating!!!
I'm confused about the claim that something that is massless cannot oscillate. Doesn't light oscillate? And isn't light massless? I don't understand...
Quantum mechanics, not the theory of relativity or the passage of time, actually explains this. Oscillation is a phenomenon specific to quantum mechanics.
If you consider the universe is full of neutrinos, photons, radiation and gravity waves all mixed together for billions of years I'd expect some interaction between all these different things. Dark mater and dark energy could be the result of these interactions. Since we just discovered the Higgs boson and didn't even know it might exist 75 years ago I'll bet ther's more to the story than we can even imagine!
If the smallest particle can be divided into smaller ones, it was wrong to calling it the Atom. This was just a bluff to make their stuff sound more futuristic.
I recently have been watching older, released apocalyptic movies, which has led me down this neutrino research rabbit hole!
Making balance between entangled strings cross points to each other of energy so some energy loses to fulfill others and just we will give those cross points name as particles but it’s specific designed pattern to observe
so what happens when one of the things interacts with an atom in your body ?
Thank you 😊
Thank you PBS! Please help us little particles!
The "Standard Model" isn't standard, and isn't a model
Love this stuff!
if E=mc^2, wouldn't everything have mass? like if all particles are forms of energy, they would have mass, just a very small amount?
NOVA for president!😂
Very cool Nova!
So, neutrinos, and possibly other mystery particles are what are involved in 'acting' on the behavior of the double slit experiment
Hmmm no. I don't think so.
The double slit experiment used photons, not neutrinos. That experiment was devised in 1909, before neutrinos were even postulated in 1930.
Thanks for the insight ❤
Interesting ramification of the mass of the neutrino is, if we can create instrumentation for neutrinos sufficient we will be able to probe gravity at a particle level using the neutrinos. Of course these instruments are probably 10 to 20 years away but eventually the secrets of gravity at a quantum level will be revealed.
I've recorded them, I've trained myself to see them. It comes in 4 forms, most of the time very active sometimes vibrating what appears to be very slowly but in reality it's extremely fast.
Nice that neutrino play different tunes durin their journey through & around the maelstrom of the cosmos, they have purpose!
Ty NOVA!!
Missed the key point (continuous beta decay spectrum).
How do we know neutrinos exist when we have yet to observe one non-synthetically?
We haven't observed any of the parts of an atom directly.
Because you can observe them period.
What does non synthetically mean.
@@colincampbell767no, we have. Quarks even.
@@DrDeuteron Really? When have we 'seen' a quark?
Too many cheap commercials
Have all known materials been targets of neutrinos?
I've never seen such complex layouts of nuclear explosions. New interactions!
awesome vid!
For the tail end of this VOD, it might be oscillations in the experiment.
I can’t wait to find out what quarks are made of!
This Video was absolutely RUINED by RUclips Ads.
Nice work RUclips or should I say AD-TUBE.
What is '"MENTAL" MASS??? Explain!
Welcome to the Truman show, the 95% in aliens watching us in this zoo.
Every second ìs a 6 day week &
Every minute to us is a year at the atomic level
Even in darkness. Light still cast its shadow?
When it is discovered that neutrinos are massless, even though they oscillate, standard particle physics will need to be rewritten once again because of this elusive particle. The neutrino will simply laugh and say, "Try to catch me".
love it ❤❤
2:29 - *"Remarkable Particles"*
Nice
Just when the standard theory is well defined, reality bites you back 🔙 🔙 with the sterile neutrino.
Basically, they’re asking for it with that name.
Very nice video
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO!
THANK YOU THANK YOU
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
If dark matter exists, shouldn't we have plenty of it right here, on earth, around earth, etc? Is it only in certain spots in the universe? Why wouldn't it basically be everywhere if it is 80 or 90% of everything that exists as they said in this video?
Definitely Interesting
We need to find more particles / we need to keep a lot of people working.
HOW CAN THE GHOST PARTICLE REMAIN CHARGE LESS AND NEGATIVE IF ITS CARYING ENERGY OR CHARGE AWAY AS FIRMI DISCRIBED
I loved Nova but on USA TV never saw BBC The Sky at Night show hosted by Patrick Moore. All the old Mariner, Viking and other Missions will have Sky At Night shows which cover them.
Thanks! brilliant...
Fermi looking 49 at 26 13:43
Vehicles or vessels - Neutrenos
Paul Pantone inventor jailed has the GEET fuel processor that transmutates the elements releasing the neutron and quantum particles that shield you from inertia
Well, considering that it’s been proven that antimatter exists, why not anti-neutrinos? Each flavor would have its opposite. That would certainly make a lot more sense, now wouldn’t it? You don’t have to try and shoehorn in a fourth particle when all you need is three other particles who are exact opposites of the detectable Lutrin’s.
That’s the whole point of the 4th neutrino, it’s a special kind that is it’s own antiparticle.. the known ones have anti versions.
I want to say that somewhere I heard that a supernova happening somewhere in the Milky Way galaxy would set off our neutrino detectors , maybe shortly after we saw the flash of the supernova .
Close. We’d detect the neutrinos first. They’d leave the collapsing core and sail through the rest of the star, virtually unimpeded. Meanwhile the shockwave from the collapsing core, that tears the star apart, would take as much as an hour or two to reach the surface. Only at that point would the supernova become apparent visually.
That's going to be interesting - our neutrino detectors going nuts , giving us a heads up that a supernova has happened somewhere . And we are building these detectors thanks to the theorists like Fermi and Pauli , and also to the experimenters like Raines , Cowans , and that other guy . Pretty interesting !
I'm an amateur astronomer. If there's a supernova, the gravity waves and neutrinos from the explosion would arrive a few hours before the light does. I'm signed up to get an alert if there is a simultaneous detection of gravity waves and neutrinos from the same direction.
@colincampbell767 : What a spectacular and dramatic confirmation of several current theories THAT would be - amateur astronomers like you being alerted that the flash of a supernova is imminent ! Everyone contributing - the theorists with their calculations , predicting the existence of neutrinos and gravity waves , and the experimenters building the instruments to observe them . Very exciting . You amateur supernova hunters are making a major contribution , like Koichi Itagaki in Japan when he found the supernova in the " pinwheel galaxy " last May . But that one happened 21 million years ago , so perhaps too far to set off neutrino and gravity wave alarms way over here !
@@johnishikawa2200if it’s close enough, the gravitational waves should show up too.
Time is 518,000 times faster at the atomic level. However, time is relative in perception
Neutrinos, the powerhouse of the cell.
Music, sound effects way too much!
these things points to our creator, how he works in our lives
Dark matter... fluctuations in the higgs field creating gravity, artifically presumably. We can not detect this field directly and thus, cant tell if its particles or just fluctuations of the field.
I wish they would explain why and how they figured it out, instead they just say they did an experiment, and they discovered this and that. But give no details, wish they would give some high-level info on how they figured something out. (For instance, they say this physicist determined neutrinos can change flavors. How did he figure that out???)