European Reacts to How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- Feel free to hit the like button and subscribe for more content. I would also love to hear your suggestions for future reactions-drop them in the comments below!🙏
👋Follow Me:
📱TIK TOK: / europeanreacts
📷INSTAGRAM: / europeanreacts
🫂FACEBOOK: profile.php?...
🔑PATREON: / europeanreacts
Also:
👉🏻ORIGINAL VIDEO: • How Would the United S...
👉🏻MAIN CHANNEL: / @european-reacts
👉🏻SECOND CHANNEL: / @andrereacts7
👉🏻MY EMAIL: europeanreacts@gmail.com
My name is André, and as a European (Portuguese), I always strive to bring a unique perspective to the topics I tackle. All my reaction videos are crafted with a playful and entertaining twist!At least I try... 🌍
✔️ European Reacts to Can America Win a NUCLEAR WAR? - Reaction For the First Time
How would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?
👉🏻Copyright Disclaimer:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS 
Развлечения
Feel free to hit the like button and subscribe for more content. I would also love to hear your suggestions for future reactions-drop them in the comments below!🙏
Please react to the (paramedic force 5 bridge creek and moore, Oklahoma tornado May 3 1999). It's the first responders response to the 1999 moore, Oklahoma F5 tornando. I currently work as an EMT with EMSA in tulsa, Oklahoma. We use this video for training new hires on mass casualty response. The camera crews riding with these ambulance crews were making a Tv show on the day and life of first responders the day moore got hit. Most people have no idea what happen in the aftermath of a tornado. This video is a great watch to understand what it takes to triage a mass casualty incident.
It’s really disturbing how excited you get by war, considering many innocent people will suffer.
War is not for entertainment. For years I worked on Defense programs never thinking about the actual destruction. During Gulf War 1 weapons I worked on were used on the Iraqis evaluation of Kuwait. They ere decimated on the "Highway of Death". From time to time I try to look at the charred remains. Not a good way to go.
My suggestion: They built a hotel on Saturn. You should react to that.
They also built an aquarium on Venus and the solar system's biggest gas station in Uranus.
STOP. SAYING. THAT. TRUMP. WANTS. TO. LEAVE. NATO.
STOP.
STOP.
STOP. SAYING. IT.
STOP.
IT'S. NOT. TRUE.
TRUMP. WILL. NOT. LEAVE. NATO.
NOBODY. IN. AMERICA. WANTS. TO. LEAVE. NATO.
STOP. SAYING. IT!
JUST. FUCKING. STOP!!
I am getting incredibly annoyed by hearing this propaganda.
What kind of muppets do they get their news from in Europe?
Sesame Street?
Spongebob?
Please help me understand how people are so incompetent and gullible that they think Trump wants to leave NATO. Please make this make sense, because if people still believe the lies that Trump wants to leave NATO, then you could theoretically convince these people of virtually anything.
Sorry bro, If Trump wins more than 90% he will. We will start new alliance a New World Order involving more Non major NATO allies like Israel, Australia not just NATO but they got to pay fair share for defense, trade and our protection was taken for granted without good deals or buying our gas when had the chance you wanted Russians pipelines can't trust that the NATO goal was from 2014 to 2024 Portugal and lots of European countries not met deadline. We need only a US lead alliance like Turkey is no real ally going against Israel & US/UK western interests got to take some bases reorganize and take our nukes will build in Poland, they want them also in Germany and Italy as well they have no say so remove from Turkey, Netherlands, and Belgium and add to Estonia maybe Romania, Czech rep. Who knows all deals will be dead and you will pay lots more since on protection/trade or alliance no more freebies had your chance and blew Trump's deadlines doesn't matter if wasn't President the deal is now null and void.UK, France will be ok also they got nukes. After borders and energy to restart the economy and change election rules then trade and tariffs will be forced by Reciprocal trade act! Even if 10% of Russian Nukes worked against our 99% it's still no good for the world even one is too much but I guarantee if Russian sends will either have Russia destroyed or the world by planet buster option sameway if we get taken over the world and all enemies pay. We will have and already starting a new cold war
nobody wins everyone loses
That is true no one will win and everyone animals will not survive in that will the end all for a war.
True words my friend
Yup. The human race would lose and be set back 100s of years.
What where my reply
True
Exactly.. no one wins. During the cuban missle crisis my father was in the air force. I asked him would we be able to survive a nuclear attack, he said " the lucky one will die in the first blast" . That said it all.
It depends on how many nukes are used and what citys and states are hit... 1 nuke wont destroy all America it would take high hundreds or maybe more
@mojomojo2 the economic fallout, not to mention nuclear, would be rough. Starving or freezing to death are the non fallout threats...yeah take me first
@@mojomojo2I think we forget how big countries are if ww3 breaks 9ut and nukes are though of being used I'm moving to new zealand 😂
This was what I did my first 7 years in the military... Minuteman 2 and 3 ICBMs
Nobody "wins" a nuclear war...
A nuclear war would most likely cause a nuclear winter for a decade if not longer if anyone or anything did survive the blast the food and water would be contaminated so it would be a matter of starvation some insects and animals might survive some birds,crocodilians and amphibians survived the asteroid that killed off the dinosaurs
The only way to "win" a nuclear war is to destroy, by surprise, the enemy's land-based nuclear capabilities and force him to surrender his submarines. Stealth bombers are also designed for this function, which is why Putin doesn't want American bases so close to his territory. People talk about millions of deaths as if a conventional war wouldn't kill millions too. But winning a nuclear war, under the conditions I mentioned, is a 10% chance. The best thing is to avoid one.
💯👍
Who dare win😂
Advantage is S 550 to shoot down military sattelites...that is big advantage for Russians and Nato dont have anithing similar tested
Your English is wonderful bro! I absolutely enjoy listening to the accent man!
Can't wait for part 2!
"I never like UK that much."
ME: DAAAAAAYMN🥶🥶🤣🤣💀
"I've never liked the UK that much" that was still fucking funny how that was the first thing that came to mind
What’s really amazing is how big the b2 bomber is you’d think it’s compact like a fighter jet but it’s HUGE
I would like to mention, this is just the public known power of Americas nukes, Air Force bases may have more
No one wins. A total lose lose lose situation.
Andre sorry your English is getting better and better every episode!!
I watched a video from 5 months ago and noticed the same thing. It’s always amazing to see progress in something happening practically in real time. Still, I’ve never had difficulty understanding him or what he’s trying to get at.
Mutual assured destruction (MAD) - the threat of using strong weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons. The strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which, once armed, neither side has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm.
I just visited the Titan Missile Museum south of Tucson, Arizona. I was able to tour an old abandoned missile silo. I went underground into the control room, yes, I turned the launch key, and I was able to see the disarmed nuclear missile. The tour guide talked about MAD. Was one of the coolest tours I had ever had.
That's where my grandpa was based when my mom was born in 66. He was a chief master sergeant at the time and he had one of those keys. Apparently he was even in the OSS (precursor to the cia) for awhile and ig he was the perfect fit he never talked ab work at all and was the most level headed person which idk how the hell you could be so calm when you have that many MAJOR responsibilities
1 im old and liked how lead paint tasted as a kid. 2 im old and dont give a fuck. I served my time.
Nuclear Weapons are terrifying!! I'm American and I worry about this all the time...Living in Colorado, where NORAD is located I'm very concerned...
Always enjoy your videos Ty for the content
Lol that UK comment cracked me up
A nuclear exchange would be the fastest way to change the balance of power. The least powerful countries would likely be untouched and would suddenly find themselves inheriting all the power. The entire continents of Africa and South America would likely come out unscathed, as well as random Western countries like Australia and Canada. If it is between the US and Russia most of Asia might be untouched. If between China and the US then Russia might survive. The US and Western Europe seem to lose in most conceivable scenarios. The surviving countries will have to deal with fallout and other secondary effects but life might not change significantly there, especially where life isn't so great already.
Mutually assured destruction or mad is what keeps ww3 from happening. This was a big deal during the cold war in America. When i was a child in school we practiced nuclear war drills. We hid under out desks for the placebo affect.
Even a one percent increase in survival rates translates to thousands of people who would survive.
Get under your desk and curl into a ball so you can kiss your ass goodbye
The cold War never ended. M.A.D. is still the standard to this day.
I live in North Dakota, so odds are I wouldn’t know what would happen next.
At 9.30 now just think of what the narratator just said there. Nothing at all will be left standing
It will just look like nothing was ever there
I would go outside. I don't want to try to survive afterwards. It will be nothing but violence and starvation.
Tbh I wouldn’t mind a little renegotiation regarding the alliance. Seems like we foot the bill so you guys can work 30 hour weeks and have month long vacations plus free healthcare.
Us maintains a 98% fly rate on ICBM's... Russia is estimated at 36%... I don't know about China, But Corruption causes lack of maintenance, so I suspect similar
China recently purged almost all of it's rocket force generals for corruption. It seems a lot of things were messed up including some silos that couldn't open once completed and missing rocket fuel stores.
Let's hope 🙏
Wrong analysis
Source?
Your English is great! Love the videos!
oh ty so much! means a lot.
That's not including top secret too
About part 2 of this there isnt a part 2 . I searched for it and i have yet to see one
I was wondering if you have ever done any reaction videos on any volcanic eruption 🌋?
That would be cool! ❤❤❤
you gotta see part 2 of this video
You should react to part 2 or watch their vid that has all part in one vid and just stop at separate parts. They also just posted a new video showing hoe nato would fight a nuclear war a few days ago.
keep in mind too this is whats reported, also not much is known about "shadow sub's" as most of that is classified, i'm a stock investor so i do DD (Due diligence) and practically everything, indeed the US Gov need's to keep some stuff secret for obvious reasons
No shit sherlock. I mean really? The government has to keep some things secret? REALLY??? OH MY GOD, YOU GENIIUS!
@@NatPat-yj2or oh, your an emo, you must be a commie-lib... sry your not worth a shake of salt but glade you figured out i'm a genius (nice typo too)
7:34 😂bro is crazy
Good evening or good day Andre❤
We All would LOSE! Thanks 🧡 Much Love!
The president does not have the power to leave NATO btw.
who does?
@mr-vegas by the constitution, the president needs 2/3s of the senate to sign or leave treaties.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 thanks for clearing it up!
Both the US and Russia have between 5-6 thousand nuclear weapons each, with Russia having around 10% more. However, the US has more actively deployed and ready for use. There are also 5 countries, mostly in Europe that host US nuclear weapons. In terms of size, the Soviet Union created and tested, by far, the most powerful nuclear weapons. The largest they tested was about 4,000 times as powerful as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima (at half the original design capacity), created an explosion that was visible from 1,000km away, and had a shockwave that circled the planet three times. However, bombs of that magnitude were deemed not to be particularly practical, leading to the streamlining of nuclear weapons to the relatively "modest" yields we see today. Both arsenals use fusion-based weapons. This type of weapon is significantly more powerful than the original fission-based nuclear weapons, and effectively uses a fission reaction as a mere detonator to start the larger and more powerful fusion reaction responsible for their substantially higher yields.
Combined, Russia and the US own 90% of the nuclear weapons on the planet. China's nuclear arsenal is tiny in comparison to either the US or Russia, but it's still significantly larger than any European country. Their stated policy, however, is that they will never use them as a first strike weapon (only in retaliation for someone using them on them first). France comes in 4th, with about 120 fewer than China.
Just remember this is glimpse of public info..imagine what else they have lol
the president cant pull us out of NATO. It has to be passed in the house and senate
I've been trying to tell him this for months, but he's slow on the uptake I think.
The President is still the commander in chief. He could simply remove U.S. forces from Europe. While leaving the NATO treaty intact.
And or.. Article 5 has some very big weasel words in it: " ... and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked".
Actions deemed necessary leaves a whole lot of leeway.. to do little or nothing. This goes for all NATO members.
That all said.. I feel the above is highly unlikely on the part of the U.S. regardless of whomever is in office.
But I remain highly skeptical of the majority of NATO members to substantially contribute to the common defense. We are years into the crisis with Ukraine, and most NATO nations have taken very little action to correct major deficiencies.
Keep in mind this is only what the US government is willing to share with the public. This is likely less than 20% what we are capable of
Thankyou very much for your love of our counrty
While people like you exist, we will fight against our enemies. God bless.
You should react to the American "Davy Crockett" Atomic Bazooka!
If nuclear war happens we all lose, which is exactly why nuclear weapons make no sense. Most of us are dead. All we can hope for is to die in the initial attack and not have to slowly suffer before we die from the fallout.
Around 90% of all life including all animals and plants would die.
@@gabecollins5585 Considering the fallout from airburst detonations are minimal, thats just fearmongering
no not most of us are dead.. please research radiation a bit more. everybody insists on living in the city but inly that city that got hit will be affected. there is still the 98 percent of the usa to live in thats not a city. that has nice sized towns and all
@@chrisvibz4753 Heard of nuclear winters?
@@chrisvibz4753 buddy that is absolutely NOT true.
There is no victor in a nuclear war.
Part two please. I'm glad Portugal was safe lol
Part 2 where can i find it
accuracy within 9 feet
Close enough for horse shoes, hand grenades or nuclear weapons.
I highly doubt that the US will leave NATO, but I know that European countries need to step up and start doing more.
I wish we had universal healthcare but we do have the best bombs. 😭
Did you know you can own an armored tank in all 50 states
Armored, sure. Armed? Not so much. Also, owning one is different from it being street legal. Maybe it would fall under "tractors", which are street legal on most roads. Although that might only be wheeled tractors, not tread tractors. Not entirely sure about that though.
Clarification: by "armed" I mean having a tank main armament gun/auto-cannon. Not just strapping a rifle on top of it.
Everyone is assed out after nuclear Armageddon
How about a video called “Can American maintain its Democracy?”
There are no winners in a nuclear war. “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” (Attributed to Albert Einstein)
You should react to How the US transports its Nuclear Weapons by Half as Interesting
10:07 Pfft no, they don't have nearly the tech or money to maintain such an arsenal, lmao
Everybody dies it so terrifying it’s hard to think about people have become desensitized to what this means let alone us 4000 Russia with 5000 and god knows how many China has plus Germany France England Israel Pakistan India were all dead
Trust me, as an American, and moreover as a human being living on this planet, this is not “Looking Ok”.
Do you know why there called minute man
You should come visit America. We have a wide range of "beauty" throughout our 50 states 😊
Your English is very good.
I would love to see your opinions on the rest of this series of videos as well. The whole thing is almost an hour long, but it goes more into the Russian side of things like the equipment and the targets they would hit within the US. I think the other parts are even more interesting than the first one, so if you are interested I think it would be a great watch.
The same channel that made this video did a longer detailed video showing the next few parts. I'd suggest watching it since it gives the true scale of a war between Russia and the US. Its roughly 55 minutes long so it could be broken up into parts.
No one wins a nuclear war. Tbh, no body truly wins war. Winning happens when one side no longer sees the point. At the end of the day, loss is felt on both sides.
Often times both sides loose in wars.
It's not about winning. It's about making the other guy lose much worse
I think you do a fantastic job explaining things in English. Better than a lot of my fellow American friends.
People calculate how long it takes to get from one country to another in time of conflict, but due to submarines, we’re already there.
Watching this. I think you need to watch and react to the movie War Games from 1983.
Man i love fallout but this scares me
The fall of the present world civilization is a win for the survivors.
They ask Einstein, a reporter, who do you think will win a nuclear war, he answered ,
I don’t know who would win but the next war will be faught with sticks and stones
We've all heard this, 1,000 times, from everyone and their mother. Find a new jig.
I don't want to set the world on fiiiiiireeeee...
Good song
The only reason why Trump want to pull out of NATO. Is because there are a lot of Americans that believe tired that there are very few European Nations that pull their own wight in NATO. If more European Counties actually abided by the regulations of NATO, we wouldn't have a problem. But as of right now. I think only 1/3 of the European Nations actually are full filling the requirements for membership.
The US is called the police of the world because we don't back down 😊
My close friend, who was in the USAF and worked on avionics on B-52 at the old SAC base. He said that In a total nuclear war, everything above the equator is gone...below would eventually be from the nuclear weapon effects.
Russia does have nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad; the baltic states have said this for years. If Russia launches from there towards the UK, it will only take 30 seconds to reach the UK.
Where our missile silo's are at is classified and going near one is going to get yourself dealt with OSI, which is the United States Air Forces, Office of Special Investigations. You dont want to screw with Federal level stuff. Also the pronunciation of Minot by this person annoys me. Minot is always been said Why Not, Minot. because the I in Minot, sounds like a Y. Also Whitman!?!?!? its Whiteman!!! its really not that hard to pronounce!
There was a book I read back in the 1980's, during the Cold War, that laid out a detailed, analytical approach of what would happen to America in a nuclear war.
The last paragraph of the book was something to the effect that:
Only two million Americans survived the War.
Yet, those two million were the toughest, most intelligent, and most resilient human beings to ever walk the planet....
So the conclusion is, all the w0ke people died?😂
Back when I was in high school, we studied Mitchell's technology starting from the 1940s up until modern day. And the accuracy of an American ICBM is measured in inches/centimeters. The accuracy of a Russian ICBMs is measured in kilometers/miles.
Just so you know, the United States has had the same nuclear response since 1960. The United States will take out Russia, North Korea, China, and Cuba. But since then, Cuba has been dropped from that list and Iran has been added,
It would basically be the end of the world for several countries.
the only reason Russia and north Korea and china want to nuke america is because of Interventionism, why does the usa have to involved themselves or save every single country in the world when they have a fucking problem but Americans are put last on the list of when to help my homeland?
Interventionism, in politics, typically refers to the practice of governments that interfere in the political affairs of other countries, staging military or trade interventions. A different term, economic interventionism, refers to intervention in economic policy at home.[1]
Military intervention, which is a common element of interventionism, has been defined by Martha Finnemore in the context of international relations as "the deployment of military personnel across recognized boundaries for the purpose of determining the political authority structure in the target state". Interventions may be solely focused on altering political authority structures, or may be conducted for humanitarian purposes, or for debt collection.[2]
@@IIIw2 Up until World War II the United States had a non-interference doctrine. Before World War 2 the United States had the 19th largest military in the world. And our navy was maybe the 12th largest in the world. But after being dragged into two world wars, the United States adopted the old Roman adage... If you want peace prepare for war. That's on the side of the Pentagon.
So anyone that poses a threat to drag us into another war, we will stir the pot so anyone that poses a threat to drag us into another war, we will stir the pot so anyone that poses a threat to drag us into another war, we will stir the pot so anyone that poses a threat to drag us into another war, we will take an interest in you.
@@IIIw2 The United States was dragged into two world wars. Before World War II the United States had a non-interventionist foreign affairs policy. But after World War II the United States adopted the Roman motto of... if you want peace, prepare for war.
@@IIIw2 no matter what we do, some country is going to drag us into another War.
@@IIIw2 Russia doesn't want to nuke on anyone
Nonsense. Theres nothing to win!
Nucular is not a word. That's just ignorant
The only thing that wins in this scenario are cockroaches.
No one wins.
Although to be fair, the B-52 flies much farther with more bombs and missiles. Still, over the vast Pacific Ocean, where the tyranny of distance prevents most aircraft from operating efficiently, the H-6K could prove to be one of China's most important planes in wartime.Sep 4, 2021
Adios Europe!!!!!!!!!
Remember that if China would launch nuclear weapons (land-based) toward the US, they would fly north over the North Pole...over the Pacific is too far. So they would have to fly over Russia to do that. Russia and China still don't like each other. So would Russia allow that?
SO......@6:05 just how did North Dakota (Minot) get WEST of Montana (Malmstrom) Hopefully he used Russian targeting data.
Russia and China have some similar stuff, but it isn’t well maintained If at all. Some of the systems are really old.
It is more likely that single shots will be taken, with both sides playing chicken. The US and Russia both have missile defense installed, with unknown effectiveness. War is always a method of persuasion, and very few wars have the same results as WWII in Europe, with the Third Reich fighting to the bitter end.
The issue with the US and NATO is countries like Germany pissing away funds on the Energiewende, and shorting defense.
I was 341st smw
Every single thing they talked about in this video is irrelevant. Don’t worry, we’re fine. 👍🙃
Disagree. Someone always wins
NATO NO THE U.N I HOPE THE U.N IS A WASTE
Ask trump he knows what the nuclear tirade is 😂
You should learn how to spell basic words before you attempt to insult other people that are many factors more intelligent than you.
You have to also keep in mind that all this is just public knowledge.
no trump wont pull us out of nato. his point is we do all the work with nato, we pay for everything. we spend the most on defense. he is tired of the usa having to defend 46 countries aka europe, but trump just says that . in reality it needs an act of congress to pull us out of nato
So, if you were shopping for an expensive, high end product, would you buy "Made in Russia", "Made in China" or "Made in the USA"? There is your answer.
Russia has a roughly similar capability in terms of numbers, but as always it's old technology they have struggled to maintain and was never that good in the first place. China, has historically kept only a token number of warheads more just to ensure they weren't a position where their enemies had some and they didn't- _but_ as with the rest of their military, they've embarked on a massive nuclear buildup which, at current pace will exceed US stockpiles by 2035 at the lastest. That pace is increasing though.
That being said, the US has been more concerned with preventing nuclear proliferation, disarmament treaties, and avoiding nuclear war entirely than keeping an edge. The US has actually drastically _reduced_ it's nuclear armament since the 70s, and has avoided sinking money into the usual costly R&D to prevent an arms race. But now that China is re-arming, well... Congress is seriously considering taking the gloves off.
The new Sentinel ICBM is currently in the works to replace the MInuteman, we've already expanded stealth technology to cruise missiles, and recently we devised a next-next generation ceramic stealth metamaterial we can spray on (like our cheese) that can resist temperatures such as the ones one might experience in hypersonic flight.
In other words, we currently have the all the ingredients prepared for nuclear capable, low-observable hypersonic cruise missiles launchable from undetectable stealth-based platforms such as the B-21 or nuclear submarine. Such a missile would basically remove the possibility of a counter-attack, considering by the time you could detect it, your cities would be ash.
What's more, of all the nations on earth, the US is the only one that could theoretically stop a nuclear strike, should we choose to embark on the massive anti-ballistic missile infrastructure project ala the one outlined in Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative program. It was prohibitively expensive even for us, highly experimental, would require us to violate several treaties, and would probably ensure a massive nuclear buildup so people could overwhelm our defenses through saturation.
But the technology is much cheaper now, adversaries are already breaking those treaties, and the nuclear buildup is already happening.
Can America win a nuclear war? I don't know. But if they fuck around, then we're gonna find out together.
While it’s true America has preserved peace in Europe for 80 years it’s also true Europeans being unwilling to defend themselves means that not might last much longer.
Fortunately President Trump promised to make Europe pay their fair share by threatening to withdraw from NATO if they do not.
America doesn’t want to leave NATO but Trump is right that America is tired of paying for Europe for the last 80 years.
There's more to our alliances than money.
We spend more, we give more, because we have more.
@@augl2702 Easy to say when you’re not paying for it.
And actually it’s the money + 70 years of it + European ingratitude + European ignorance.
If Europeans are not willing to sacrifice to defend Europe then Americans absolutely should not be doing so.
@@augl2702 oh and NO we don’t “have more” but we do spend more and give more absolutely.
Meanwhile we literally have a massive invasion at our own border which we can fix when Trump behind the mass deportation program he promised using the money Europeans owe us for 70 years of defense.
Wrong, Fascist Dictator wannabe Trump is tired of it, America is not.
Actually Poland pays more than the USA. 3.9% of their GDB to our 3.5%.
I wouldn't worry about Trump leaving NATO. Just by saying that several NATO countries started put more money in to NATO. He just wants some of the countries to pay there share . You have seen in the video how much money the United States spends. Our military keeps all of Europe safe. We will never expect Europe's military to protect use. It's just time for a few of these countries to put forth some effort.
Also a president can not do that it must go through the house and senate for that to happen.