BRITISH GUY Reacts to USA Military vs The World - Who Would Win?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 498

  • @MoreAdamCouser
    @MoreAdamCouser  6 месяцев назад +9

    Don’t miss out on all the action this week at DraftKings! Download the DraftKings app today! Sign-
    up using dkng.co/adamcouser or through my promo code ADAMCOUSER

    • @corryburton9252
      @corryburton9252 6 месяцев назад

      he says most 4th generations would get taken out....... f15 goes 1900 mph is still one of the fastest jet on planet, is the most heavily armed jet on earth, and has a REAL WORLD GAMERSCORE of 114 to 0.......thats right 0 losses in 50 years...one lost a wing flew 10 miles and landed safely....ACTUALLY HAPPENED look it up....and one of those 114 air to air kills was against a moving helicopter with a bomb.....not a missle, a bomb...
      dont think for 1 sec that our "4th generation" are at all behind the rest of the world, just because we got 5th gen now...
      we still got like 200 active f15s......this is a 50 year old jet btw, and its still this insane.....

    • @corryburton9252
      @corryburton9252 6 месяцев назад

      Ps. youre right.....we dont need foot soldiers....but what makes the US president truly the strongest man on earth is in late 1700s, George Washington made it where Marines are the only branch that can be deployed anywhere on earth with a presidential signature and NO act of war needed from congress....meaning, sure we might not need foot soldiers, but our president can put 177k of the baddest amphibious soldiers the world has ever seen on your beach by morning...

    • @kausi-ok3mr
      @kausi-ok3mr 6 месяцев назад

      Not windows, vertical launch missiles.

    • @MrSqueasil
      @MrSqueasil 5 месяцев назад

      By Law we have to basically be able to fight everyone and win. BY LAW.

    • @MrSqueasil
      @MrSqueasil 5 месяцев назад

      also, we actually do war games for this scenario. We win every time. barely. but we win. even when we give ourselves heavy handicaps we still come out on top. its kinda crazy.

  • @Soolus
    @Soolus 6 месяцев назад +184

    As an American born and raised, our government has scenarios for everything.
    CONPLAN 8888 is a zombie apocalypse scenario. This is not a joke 😂

    • @MarkMyWords531
      @MarkMyWords531 5 месяцев назад +12

      At one time we even had plans for invading Canada. I don’t know of any for invading Mexico.

    • @antpol1029
      @antpol1029 5 месяцев назад +19

      @@MarkMyWords531 we've been to direct war with Mexico 4 or 5 times so yes, we have not only planned it, that's how we got California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, parts of Colorado and Oklahoma. We did invade Mexico, very successfully lol

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 5 месяцев назад

      @@antpol1029 No we haven't been at war with Mexico 4 or 5 times. It was once in 1836. You people are very scary!

    • @Raggmopp-xl7yf
      @Raggmopp-xl7yf 4 месяца назад

      Yeah - I never worried about a zombie apocalypse until the CDC denied there was such a virus. Well 💩!

    • @Worlow87
      @Worlow87 4 месяца назад +3

      @@antpol1029 We were supposed to have even more territory, but the negotiator we sent was a Mexican Sympathizer

  • @Scott-v8k
    @Scott-v8k 2 месяца назад +30

    One thing to remember is that 90-100 million American citizens own 400-600 million firearms and 4-6 trillion cartridges.

  • @snakepliska837
    @snakepliska837 6 месяцев назад +65

    Not only can the US Navy remove satellites from orbit, but it's been done with with an SM-3 (STANDARD missile.) The speed of a satellite means that you have to position the missile in front of the satellite to be run into.. and since there's no automated system that can calculate this kind of thing, they did most of the calculations with their human brains. Keep in mind this was 16 years ago.

    • @iamsneakyfoxx1284
      @iamsneakyfoxx1284 5 месяцев назад +6

      it's also been done before in 1985. On September 13, 1985, Major Doug Pearson made history when he destroyed a satellite with a missile launched from his F-15.

  •  6 месяцев назад +276

    Most people don't know that the US has enough oil reserves to last over 300 years

    • @lazybear236
      @lazybear236 6 месяцев назад +16

      Probably more

    •  6 месяцев назад +3

      r236 could be

    • @Ottawajames
      @Ottawajames 6 месяцев назад

      I figure that the US would annex Canada immediately in this scenario. We've got the 4th largest reserves of oil (and probably way more to be discovered) plus every valuable mineral and metal you can think of and we have basically no defense to speak of. The US could take over in an afternoon with minimal casualties.

    • @zeuso.1947
      @zeuso.1947 6 месяцев назад +26

      And that's not even counting the high quality coal.

    •  6 месяцев назад +5

      Agreed

  • @papawheelie1645
    @papawheelie1645 4 месяца назад +22

    This is probably already mentioned in the 371 comments so this is probably redundant but what this video is missing (by necessity) is all the military power we have that is not known to the public.

    • @Raggmopp-xl7yf
      @Raggmopp-xl7yf 4 месяца назад +3

      Yeah - every time they declassify some scary war machine I get a sinking feeling knowing that's already old-tech to them.

    • @TeresaGrimes-q3g
      @TeresaGrimes-q3g 8 часов назад

      As every country, DO NOT share every secret. It sets all of us up for OBLITERATION.

  • @shag139
    @shag139 6 месяцев назад +80

    Dude, the US not only has the most well equipped it is the most experienced war fighting force in the world. The tactics and lessons learned in 100 years of fighting wars is invaluable.

    • @kendallneason3645
      @kendallneason3645 6 месяцев назад +5

      We also spend more on defensive equipment than all other of our allies combined.

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 5 месяцев назад

      Most experienced? Not even close! Tactics change all the time with every new war and more so during wars. There's a huge difference with being patriotic and being delusional. You are more on the delusional side IMHO. We have the most expensive and wasteful military on the plane bar none! We have 1000 military bases around the world, 95% of which we don't need and a wide open southern border through which tens of millions of third worlds people are flooding into the country. It's a total mess! There is no way to fix what's wrong anymore. So good luck with your delusion.

    • @clearvisionpicture1871
      @clearvisionpicture1871 3 месяца назад +1

      👍

  • @jimmyb3609
    @jimmyb3609 6 месяцев назад +127

    Wouldn't be just the military there's also a large portion of the civilian population armed. And many of those armed civilians are military veterans.

    • @garycamara9955
      @garycamara9955 6 месяцев назад +23

      Literally everyone I know is armed, even the women.

    • @garycamara9955
      @garycamara9955 6 месяцев назад +4

      Tactics don't mean shit if you don't have to leave home to totally destroy the enemy.

    • @garycamara9955
      @garycamara9955 6 месяцев назад +12

      Th USA has the largest Navy in the history of the world.

    • @44dperez
      @44dperez 6 месяцев назад +5

      Civilians being armed only matters if the homeland is invaded. Given the HIGH unlikelihood of an invasion, the hillbillies with their guns are a non-factor in a global conflict.

    • @Socialism_on_Roids
      @Socialism_on_Roids 6 месяцев назад

      America has around 18 million veterans.

  • @MyTexasLife
    @MyTexasLife 5 месяцев назад +7

    If a war came to our shores, we not only have a military, but a large amount of civilians are armed and ready to defend their families, homes, neighborhoods, cities, and states that make up this great country. We win.

  • @nicholasluff7452
    @nicholasluff7452 6 месяцев назад +63

    So happy seeing you with a sponsorship on your channel, I hope you enjoy getting America on your side 🇺🇸🦅🦅

  • @Rogue_Brian_Plays
    @Rogue_Brian_Plays 6 месяцев назад +38

    This video just reinforces the sentiment from the 1983 film, Wargames. Even then the result of who would win in this fight is simple, "THE ONLY WAY TO WIN THIS FIGHT IS TO NOT START IT IN THE FIRST PLACE BECAUSE EVERYONE LOSES IF THE FIGHT HAPPENS."

    • @jamesslater2483
      @jamesslater2483 6 месяцев назад +4

      I agree with you station why fight a war that would end in mass genocide as in the past one man tried and failed his name is one that should never be used hint he was from Germany (………)

    • @GingerbreadMan-H8Me
      @GingerbreadMan-H8Me 4 месяца назад

      i agree 100 percent with Brian's answer

    • @GingerbreadMan-H8Me
      @GingerbreadMan-H8Me 4 месяца назад

      The video's scenario is without nukes. But the world has nukes and itchy trigger fingers.

  • @greggwilliamson
    @greggwilliamson 6 месяцев назад +37

    One Barrel of oil is equal to: 42 US gallons, 35 Imperial gallons, or 159 liters

  • @TnT_F0X
    @TnT_F0X 6 месяцев назад +50

    Playing Battleship with the US:
    World: HA! I sunk one of your 72 Destroyers!
    US: Oh yeah! Well... F your Internet! ~Targets satellite~
    World: What do yo- ~Player has left the chat.~

    • @Dazza13Bravo
      @Dazza13Bravo 6 месяцев назад +2

      War isn't a video game.

    • @Raggmopp-xl7yf
      @Raggmopp-xl7yf 4 месяца назад

      @@Dazza13Bravo Yes it is.....

    • @johntheherbalistg8756
      @johntheherbalistg8756 3 месяца назад +1

      😂

    • @johntheherbalistg8756
      @johntheherbalistg8756 3 месяца назад +2

      ​@@Dazza13Bravo Modern warfare may as well be, since all the meaningful stuff gets done with a controller or keyboard and mouse

    • @chartreusemm1481
      @chartreusemm1481 27 дней назад

      @@Dazza13Bravo Enders Game

  • @EagleFang74
    @EagleFang74 6 месяцев назад +59

    Africa has 54 countries each with their own government and militaries. There’s no one African Military but I believe they have various coalitions and defense agreements.

    • @CC-EMT-P
      @CC-EMT-P 6 месяцев назад +4

      I usually really like this guy but yeah Africa's not a country

    • @Peatingtune
      @Peatingtune 6 месяцев назад +7

      African military power is pretty spread out between its countries. Egypt, Algeria, Morocco and Ethiopia are some of the strongest, and in the scenario from this video would no doubt be concentrating on working with the EU to kick the US out of the Middle East and to protect the Mediterranean. South Africa and Nigeria are relatively strong for African countries, but are too far from the major action to contribute much. Whether the combined forces of African militaries not busy in the Middle East could achieve anything besides material support is unclear to me, but I doubt it.

    • @snakepliska837
      @snakepliska837 6 месяцев назад +2

      I had a friend ask why Africa isn't the 'United States of Africa'... I didn't even know where to start.

    • @CosmicMumenRider
      @CosmicMumenRider 6 месяцев назад +1

      Well why wouldn’t they? Africa is a continent, not a country

    • @CabVideoz
      @CabVideoz 6 месяцев назад +2

      The African League has TRIED but for so many reasons it's not led to one really solid African peacekeeping force of any note.

  • @ganjanamedtyler
    @ganjanamedtyler 4 месяца назад +7

    Im Muscogee Creek native american, and i was born on a military base. I AM patriotism incarnate lmfao

  • @J.D666
    @J.D666 6 месяцев назад +18

    The US Marines (a department of the US Navy🤫) have 36 prepositioned freighter ships with the table of equipment for a battalion of artillery/amphibious supported infantry for an incursion of 30 days and more.

  • @robertmcdowell3769
    @robertmcdowell3769 6 месяцев назад +11

    Around 4:48, OPEC stands for Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Its an economic block of countries like the EU.

  • @bnotapplicable7000
    @bnotapplicable7000 6 месяцев назад +19

    Any and ALL wars have multiple domains: air, sea, infrastructure, cyber, et al. EVERY war will always come down to the man on the surface. Denying your enemy of nice things only gets you so far.

    • @_Jake.From.Statefarm_
      @_Jake.From.Statefarm_ 5 месяцев назад +3

      Germany learned the hard way that your ground forces are useless if you can't supply them with fuel. If your economy is collapsing they feeding and arming your ground units, as well as transporting them becomes impossible. They my as well be school crossing guards.

  • @Em1nem1sF1re
    @Em1nem1sF1re 3 месяца назад +6

    Yes, America can take on the whole world alone! We're Unstoppable!😂😂❤

    • @Erenyeager-o1x
      @Erenyeager-o1x 15 дней назад

      I don't think so, everyone knows what happened in Afghanistan😂

  • @kendallneason3645
    @kendallneason3645 6 месяцев назад +17

    I worry less about weapons war and more about enemy countries attacking using technology especially social media and gaming to spread propaganda throughout our country. That’s more terrifying these days. The fact that social websites can be used secretly to influence the way Americans feel and think about political figures and plant false news is something our country needs to be better at spotting and informing citizens about. We need tech ready to battle just as much if not more than weapons and machinery.

    • @reaperbsc
      @reaperbsc 5 месяцев назад

      That's not scary at all. Good education and accessibility of information means it'll never be more then an annoying fly buzzing around. The vocal minority *cough maga cough* is much louder then they are numerous.

    • @Dilligaf124
      @Dilligaf124 20 дней назад

      Haha we are doing that ourselves.

  • @HBC423
    @HBC423 5 месяцев назад +6

    And just think about how darpa is supposedly 30 to 40 years ahead in technology, that the world or US public doesn’t have

  • @tylerhackner9731
    @tylerhackner9731 6 месяцев назад +28

    Our military is insane

  • @brentprosser7293
    @brentprosser7293 Месяц назад +2

    We won't sell anyone the F22 because even WE are afraid of that thing. There is even a hesitancy to use it because we're not even sure if we wouldn't become drunk with power and just keep letting it off the leash. I saw one at an air show and it defies the laws of physics and everything I ever learned about aircraft.

  • @edwardgamboa7576
    @edwardgamboa7576 4 месяца назад +2

    I like how he says “but personally I think it is”🎉🎉🎉

  • @chrisshadows4510
    @chrisshadows4510 6 месяцев назад +15

    There is literally big books that have every battle plan and scenarios which includes what other countries military assets are.
    Boots on the ground are still needed since they would have to control some assets that blowing up would be bad...very bad.

    • @xCeLProDucTionZz
      @xCeLProDucTionZz 6 месяцев назад

      Anyone a fool who thinks a country will let another county know all there secret programs 😂

  • @BrbReactions
    @BrbReactions Месяц назад +3

    To answer the question at 4:02.. We know we can😅

  • @TheGhostGuitars
    @TheGhostGuitars 6 месяцев назад +5

    16:35 Those ARE windows…
    …for missiles to be launched from the subs. Even from underwater. 😉
    Well, ok, they're more properly called hatches. But they serve same purpose: a portal to alow missiles to exit the sub.

  • @Goosemeyer
    @Goosemeyer 6 месяцев назад +47

    Tactics? We fly towards you. You turn on your radar. We have radar seeking weapons. Now you’re blind

    • @christophershrout5850
      @christophershrout5850 6 месяцев назад +7

      and most of our planes cant be detected by radar

    • @kksurewhatever
      @kksurewhatever 6 месяцев назад +2

      The tactic is go to the other countries and help them train. That our tactics, the US helped train them and know what they are going to be capable of mostly.

    • @enigmagrieshaber5555
      @enigmagrieshaber5555 6 месяцев назад +3

      Tbh turning on your radar when there's an AWACS is a death wish cuz you'll get detected by an airplane far exceeding your radar sight
      Which would give the planes a sight on you by letting the AWACS guide the missiles and just shoot your down (as a radar)

    • @snakepliska837
      @snakepliska837 6 месяцев назад

      @@christophershrout5850 Wrong! Any radar system capable of tracking a bumblebee-sized target at range (past EW interference) can track US stealth aircraft just fine.🤣

    • @paratroopdawg
      @paratroopdawg 6 месяцев назад +3

      @@snakepliska837 I know you are being a bit snarky, but there is some truth to that, but that also takes highly trained personnel, which are not in abundance in most countries. But even if you can spot that supersonic bumble bee, what can your anti-air systems realistically do about it? Not a whole lot. Maybe a lucky kill here and there? Maybe. But, in trying to track that aircraft long enough to get a sufficient lock, you've just become a high priority target telling a PGM to "come to pappa!" ELINT is a bitch!

  • @David-hi5nd
    @David-hi5nd 5 месяцев назад +3

    Let's not forget. The US citizens possess more small arms and ammo than the US military itself. The citizens could hold the homeland, while its military takes care of the rest of the world.

  • @Micah-6.8
    @Micah-6.8 5 месяцев назад +2

    Don’t forget that the civilian population has about 120 firearms per 100 people in America.

  • @daringfan871
    @daringfan871 6 месяцев назад +4

    i would be difficult and long but possibly a win for us to add on the biggest issue is that we don’t completely have a listing for everything every country has especially the United States and as a person that lives here in America we don’t know how much we have everyone gets barely told old things even those in our military forces are only told so little so I could imagine other countries

  • @Bigbaggzceo
    @Bigbaggzceo 4 месяца назад +2

    As an American even the civilians have enough weapons to take on the world…

  • @Tee-ina-Skee-Mask
    @Tee-ina-Skee-Mask 4 месяца назад +2

    the only "sure thing" we have in this situation as Americans would be to defend our homeland. there just isnt an airforce or navy that could handle the trip and invasion

  • @mitchellgildea254
    @mitchellgildea254 6 месяцев назад +24

    Without nukes, absolutely. The problem is there ain't no chance in hell no one's NOT using nukes

    • @JerelleBowens
      @JerelleBowens 6 месяцев назад +2

      Oh you know they would

    • @burgergaming19
      @burgergaming19 6 месяцев назад +7

      As a Canadian I know our country would back the USA as well no matter what.
      UNLESS our current goof of a leader is still in power 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @nickinskeep
      @nickinskeep Месяц назад +1

      ​@@burgergaming19 I love Canada, and have never heard of anyone in the US who doesn't. I'm sure this isn't 100% obviously, but we have your back regardless of your current leader

  • @Bearfacts01
    @Bearfacts01 25 дней назад +1

    being from USA Can't we all just get along????? Seriously?

  • @richardDara-ot9zp
    @richardDara-ot9zp 6 дней назад +1

    Strategic placement it's Chess not Checkers💪🏽🇺🇸

  • @NancyVaughan-qp2gn
    @NancyVaughan-qp2gn 5 месяцев назад +2

    Every american would rise to arms, most likely. And most of us would die fighting rather than give up

  • @seanscott
    @seanscott 6 месяцев назад +2

    given the rule of no nuclear weapons in this war game, its a resounding yes. the US could defend itself against a global attack. no nation in the world has the might of the US navy. some may argue, while true that the chinese navy is the largest in the world by vessel count, yet they dont have the ships or logistics to traverse an entire ocean only their local waters. the US has been doing it since WW1. it is a blessing and a curse of our geography and not many understand why our defense budget is so high. most nations fight in their "backyards". the US has to travel to help defend their friends

  • @remanscimitar
    @remanscimitar 2 месяца назад +1

    Russian attack submarines have windows on them as a safety measure due to Russian weather being extremely cold (also the internal cabin fills with water to avoid cracking the port windows).

  • @blabbermouth2747
    @blabbermouth2747 4 месяца назад +2

    Knowing what I know from just my fiance... purple heart vet air force. His brother is navy and very very high up. Like as high as you think. Yeah. We can. US will win

  • @HLLPanzerShrek
    @HLLPanzerShrek 4 месяца назад +2

    As an American if the rest of the world said no nukes I give it 4 months before the American Flag Flys over the Planet

  • @lacyblack1
    @lacyblack1 5 месяцев назад +2

    they forget about most homes in the usa have multiple weapons too and alot have big weapons, big then rifles and thats the normals, not even the preppers or the crazies lol

  • @squfucs
    @squfucs 2 месяца назад

    nice arms bro, lookin jacked. ripped. swole. keep us updated with more progress pics.

  • @mikebunner3498
    @mikebunner3498 6 месяцев назад +1

    Adam,
    One of the many areas the United States excels in is logistics. We are damn good at getting a lot of something somewhere amazing fast. Some of our branches have turned this into an art! Think United States Marine Corp. Yes the U. S. could fight most of the world. No nukes allowed. They game plan this kind of stuff. Chilling, you bet!!! I am NOT a military expert. But you have to put boots on the ground to hold it. A barrel of oil is considered to be 42 U. S. gallons. This would be messy. And very deadly!!!!!!!

  • @JPMadden
    @JPMadden 6 месяцев назад +2

    OPEC is the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. Neither the U.S. nor Russia, two of the largest producers, are members of OPEC.
    The original video is nearly 6 years old. It downplays the threat of the Chinese Navy, which is steadily growing in size. In this war game scenario, they might be the greatest danger to American forces.

  • @boroblueyes
    @boroblueyes 2 месяца назад +1

    If it were a surprise att ack like at Pearl Harbor, we will see it coming and counterattack. Seeing that it's a coordinated effort against us, the military would go full scale all at once, since theoretically we don't have any allies to resupply us. I think the U. S. response would be devastating. Nuclear power gives us a major advantage.

  • @nickinskeep
    @nickinskeep Месяц назад +2

    Seriously, does anyone in the world believe the US isn't #1 in terms of being a global super power??

  • @rerun3283
    @rerun3283 6 месяцев назад

    Russian subs are designed to operate in cold areas so the top of the tower is enclosed with windows so the watch can stay warm. But the area is not pressurized so the windows are not a weak point.

  • @emmawilde152
    @emmawilde152 2 месяца назад +1

    I've seen video of foreign militaries that didn't have the armament of city police forces here.

  • @darthrevan1712
    @darthrevan1712 6 месяцев назад +2

    Obviously this scenario would never happen, but if it did, I truly believe most countries around the world would rather give up than fight America. USA would probably go to as many of those guaranteed victories that could happen instantly and then place troops, supply centers, and medical centers there. This would be done with a smaller, but still powerful group as the main would be focusing on the Oil in the Middle East like it is said in the video. That way any country that is choosing to fight back will have to face the USA in every direction while America is constantly being resupplied and healed. I honestly don't think much fighting would happen because until the Russia vs Ukraine war happened, most people and countries feared the Russian Military. After seeing Russia fail again and again however, most people and countries are no longer afraid of them. So, there's really only a few that would choose to fight back, and if somehow all Nuclear Weapons were removed, I think the USA would win within a year if not less than that.

  • @1anubis1god
    @1anubis1god 2 месяца назад +1

    US aircraft biased isn’t the the body of enemy aircraft. It’s bias the cockpit. Just let that sink in same thing for tanks. The bias is the command center of the tank not just the tank itself. We’re taking out personnel while destroying vehicles is literally a standard tactic of US military forces same thing with the the control center of the enemy ship

  • @abundantabsurdity7085
    @abundantabsurdity7085 3 месяца назад +1

    No. Those were not windows on the sub. Those are nuclear missile launch tubes. That sub is made for one task: destroying the world of your enemy before they destroy yours. The video glosses over the fact that these subs being used as a blockade is the threat of nuclear destruction. They have normal torpedoes too, but really, it's the nukes...

  • @Isaacsbased
    @Isaacsbased 4 месяца назад +1

    All the tech is cool but the guys on the ground doin the dirty work are what win wars

  • @kayleevernetti8157
    @kayleevernetti8157 5 месяцев назад +1

    The algorithm has led me down a bunch of these videos. I've not seen anyone of them comment on how the police are also militarized. So it's not just civilians being armed it's literally having military equipment at our disposal.

  • @Unchainedmelody151
    @Unchainedmelody151 6 месяцев назад +3

    Not only the over a million active duty, there’s a large number of reserves that they call on if they need them, and if there ever were a war on US soil everybody & they momma is armed here. I’m a mom of 3 & I keep a gun in my car 😂

    • @karlheinzvonkroemann2217
      @karlheinzvonkroemann2217 5 месяцев назад

      For every American carrying a rifle 16 are carrying supplies of some sort. Not that many are available to actually fight.

    • @Unchainedmelody151
      @Unchainedmelody151 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@karlheinzvonkroemann2217 I’m not even sure what that means.. not literally every person has a gun, but there are literally more guns than people here. Most people that have guns have multiple & it’s common for us to take our kids to the gun range & teach our kids how to use a gun too as a sport. Being able ti at least shoot something is fundamental here.. as for the military there are more reserves than active. So in an actual war that needed the reserves to fight there would he probably close to 2million

  • @pattaccone
    @pattaccone 6 месяцев назад +2

    As a neighbour and ally , I’m just happy to be on their side !
    Thanks US soldiers , not only Americans appreciate you
    This guy would probably pronounce cool whip a lot like stewie 😂😂

  • @jacobtiger964
    @jacobtiger964 6 месяцев назад +1

    Our pilots are the best cause the training they get more time in the most advanced aircraft in the world

  • @tj_2701
    @tj_2701 6 месяцев назад +1

    Adam makes great content 💚💚💚💚

  • @teenystudioflicks1635
    @teenystudioflicks1635 6 месяцев назад

    Another great submarine movie is 'Das Boot' starring Jürgen Prochnow. It has held up well and shows how horrible it is to serve on a sub during a war. A perfect WWII movie! I is not all about war but the actions between the crew under such stress. I was so tense during this film that my muscles were sore afterwards. It pulls you in so you are a part of it. It had many accolades.

  • @troyshilanski380
    @troyshilanski380 6 месяцев назад +2

    As a squid in the early 90s i never felt threatened about sinking.

  • @alaina5958
    @alaina5958 6 месяцев назад +3

    Omg i have seen this video a half a dozen times and never noticed the sub that looked like it had windows!😂
    Thank you for the video! Keep um comin'!

  • @debbers
    @debbers 4 месяца назад +1

    Those are probably port holes on the submarines little windows that you can see through!

    • @loganshaw4527
      @loganshaw4527 2 месяца назад +1

      Or Missel tunes or solos.

    • @debbers
      @debbers 2 месяца назад +1

      @@loganshaw4527 or that! I don't know what Missel tunes are or solos are but oh well. Thank you for your reply!

  • @DJFourie
    @DJFourie 6 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks again Adam.

  • @jimb2343
    @jimb2343 6 месяцев назад

    Can you imagine boats like on D-Day trying to do that on either coast to America? Good luck.

  • @John2r1
    @John2r1 27 дней назад +1

    We shot down a satellite with an F-15 on 13 September 1985. So yeah we have had that ability for the last 39 years. We didn't have an excuse to use it.

  • @jackwalker9492
    @jackwalker9492 6 месяцев назад +9

    Africa has a military version of NATO called the African Union and they should not be underestimated. They contribute to alot of peacekeeping operations. Brazil has a superb military and served alongside us in WWII. They are a powerhouse and produce great aircraft, weaponry and also have a space program. And, smoking women!

    • @JerelleBowens
      @JerelleBowens 6 месяцев назад

      Well said

    • @JerelleBowens
      @JerelleBowens 6 месяцев назад

      Well said

    • @johnzubil2875
      @johnzubil2875 6 месяцев назад +6

      I'll give you the women. The rest is a shit show.

    • @jackwalker9492
      @jackwalker9492 6 месяцев назад

      @@johnzubil2875 Dont forget Rodizio (the places that just serve meat on a skewer!). Havent been there yet, but despite the crime etc., I intend to visit, but I hear you.

    • @Steve-gx9ot
      @Steve-gx9ot 6 месяцев назад

      Brazil uses females as soldiers = cannon fodder. Cooooool

  • @augustinrocha7548
    @augustinrocha7548 16 дней назад +1

    We've already seen in the last 100 yrs how europe handles things

  • @countrybuiltlife
    @countrybuiltlife 6 месяцев назад +4

    Not the world. Canada ain’t that dumb. We would be the 52 state. lol 😂

    • @reaperbsc
      @reaperbsc 5 месяцев назад

      We would never attack Canada or Australia. You guys are like our little brothers! Long live the colonies independence! 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇦🇺

  • @valley3343
    @valley3343 2 месяца назад +1

    If our American government steps out of lines...the American people love the world/country enough to whoop our own ass.

  • @oxford17
    @oxford17 3 месяца назад

    We need, respect, and love our allies.

  • @judymurry2771
    @judymurry2771 6 месяцев назад +1

    I’ve always wanted to go to beautiful Ireland. Love you Adam 💕

  • @charliemancuso5690
    @charliemancuso5690 6 месяцев назад +2

    Yes. Merica!

  • @davidrichards4451
    @davidrichards4451 6 месяцев назад +1

    You only need big ground forces if you plan on occupying land.

  • @Kovich13
    @Kovich13 6 месяцев назад +1

    The problem a world alliance would have is communication, which creates a huge problem for your “tactics” question. Every country not already in alliance with one other lack the ability to communicate effectively which would cause confusion and lead to their demise against a well-oiled machine like the US military.

  • @isaiahkane9282
    @isaiahkane9282 6 дней назад

    “Gotta take my shoes off for this 💀💀💀💀💀💀”

  • @KahavaveCAPIPI
    @KahavaveCAPIPI 6 месяцев назад +1

    Whether you need boots on the ground depends on what you plan on doing. The victory condition here for America is basically stop the GA, which can probably be achieved with very limited direct combat; individual countries could almost certainly be bombed into agreeing to status quo ante bellum, its just getting them to that point which would be expensive.
    Now, if Americas win condition was global occupation, that would be a lot trickier.

  • @Angeluis2883
    @Angeluis2883 6 месяцев назад

    Love your videos bro. Keep up the good work

  • @MintyHay44
    @MintyHay44 2 месяца назад +1

    Seeing these videos are so funny because all this information is public knowledge. Think about all the secrets that aren't known. Think about drones. Drones have been out and used for years now. There are always bigger and better things that aren't known. This is why the US military have such a big budget.

  • @audiogarden21
    @audiogarden21 6 месяцев назад +1

    11:58. Check out The Abyss, Adam.

  • @Dsmwarrior1996
    @Dsmwarrior1996 6 месяцев назад +2

    The carrier isn't the only one to shoot down a satellite, an F-15 shot one of our own satellites out of space to prove to the soviets we could shoot theirs down too, on another note, the military wouldn't have to worry about protecting the homeland, because there is a rifle behind every blade of grass, the American population has I think it's 2.4 guns per every 1 person, and trillions upon trillions of rounds of ammo

  • @kryptektales6938
    @kryptektales6938 6 месяцев назад +1

    The US govt has an official by the numbers plan to fight a zombie apocalypse. They thought of and planned for enemy tactics lol

  • @anpat3
    @anpat3 2 месяца назад +1

    I think we could but I sure hope it never comes to this!!

  • @dalebickerstaff1543
    @dalebickerstaff1543 6 месяцев назад +1

    That satalite shoot down was conducted by a land base F-15 fighter out of the western part of the US. It was a defunct US satalite but because it was there in one orbit of the earth and gone when it should have been there the russians would have noticed that.

    • @reaperbsc
      @reaperbsc 5 месяцев назад +1

      That was the first time. Then we did it from sea level with a destroyer.

  • @ryanhampson673
    @ryanhampson673 6 месяцев назад

    You still need foot soldiers to take and hold ground. Yes the air war is the primary way to attack but you cannot fully root out the enemy unless you get boots on the ground. Also artillery is extremely effective. In most armies large bore artillery only accounts for around 15% of total numbers but creates over half of all casualties.

    • @Dazza13Bravo
      @Dazza13Bravo 6 месяцев назад

      Economics will bring a country to it's knees.

    • @_Jake.From.Statefarm_
      @_Jake.From.Statefarm_ 5 месяцев назад

      That's true if you're trying to actually seize the land. If you're destroying infrastructure all it takes is a guy in Vegas with a joystick... lol

  • @sarcazen3171
    @sarcazen3171 6 месяцев назад

    These are though provoking Adam! It helps reframe my perspective, thank you :)

  • @Ripit1
    @Ripit1 6 месяцев назад +1

    Our only threat is our corrupt politicians

  • @rasicule
    @rasicule 6 месяцев назад

    Fun video and all. The problem with this scenario is that other countries have nukes - meaning that this scenario would never happen.

  • @user-clayrush
    @user-clayrush 6 месяцев назад

    As far as I know the Russians are the only subs that have "windows" in the mast of their subs. They are not under any pressure & are only used while running the surface in rough weather

  • @bierce716
    @bierce716 6 месяцев назад

    Yes, many Russian subs have windows. NOT in the pressure hull, but in The conning tower... Russian weather can be so bad that you want protection pulling into or out of port.

  • @Ewok_Templar
    @Ewok_Templar 3 месяца назад

    In all the links in your description
    I couldn't find one to this vanilla setting.

  • @Wilkidw
    @Wilkidw 5 месяцев назад

    An oil barrel is 55 us gallons or 165 litres.

  • @christophersmith2040
    @christophersmith2040 6 месяцев назад +2

    You should react to the us marine corps boot camp

  • @yusted1
    @yusted1 3 месяца назад

    This video was made before the usa found yet another massive shale oil deposit. Quite possibly the largest ever discovered

  • @Chelle_Angel
    @Chelle_Angel 6 месяцев назад

    Hey Adam, if you want the true and best version look up Mona rose her version is called Star Spangled Banner As You've Never Heard It
    Am enjoying your reactions to things In America

  • @s1ugtrail978
    @s1ugtrail978 6 месяцев назад +1

    Fun fact....
    In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was talk about the United States aiming to become a 'hyperpower,' a term used to describe a nation with unparalleled global influence, even beyond that of traditional superpowers. It was an interesting concept that emerged after the Cold War when the U.S. was seen as the sole superpower.
    So to clarify it that is the reason why the United States is so powerful today...
    Because it is the only hyperpower within the world just as it used to be the only superpower after the cold war....
    And as long as it continues on track as it is with the growth of technology, once humans become a space bearing race, they will be the only celestial power...
    Though the future hasn't been written yet and it will be interesting to see what comes out of it

    • @xCeLProDucTionZz
      @xCeLProDucTionZz 6 месяцев назад

      China economy dwarfs USA go to war with china you won’t out produced her why do you America was so powerful in ww2 not the technology but she could make more planes and ships faster then any other country times have changed it’s now china that is the industry powerhouse once eu trade more with china that’s when dollar will lose value quickly china will become the new superpower every economist in the world says this will happen

  • @mattpoules9225
    @mattpoules9225 6 месяцев назад +1

    wouldn't we even have one friend....bummer

  • @thomasblack3675
    @thomasblack3675 6 месяцев назад +1

    I think when they say barrel's it's like a 55 gallon drum.🧐🤔

    • @bobprivate8575
      @bobprivate8575 6 месяцев назад

      55 US gallons is what you called it: a standard drum. A barrel of oil is 42 US gallons, 35 Imperial gallons, 159L.

  • @donhastings841
    @donhastings841 6 месяцев назад

    800 billion barrels, = 44 trillion gallons. 1 Barrel= 55gal.
    So, I guess that is where the dinosaurs lived😂😂😂

  • @enduringhope6859
    @enduringhope6859 6 месяцев назад +4

    As a US born and raised citizen, I must mention this about China.
    Chinese nationals have been able to purchase millions of acres across the country. The US gave China the Suez Cznal. The US gave China a very important shipp8ng yard in California. China has a stronghold here in the US. Though firepower is lacking, they are strategically working their 'plans" here within our borders.
    Suitcase nuclear bombs have been spoken of.
    But, then again, the US military and citizens are well armed and ready for any internal conflict.

    • @garycamara9955
      @garycamara9955 6 месяцев назад

      Only control of the Ocean ports, Panama controls the canal.

    • @JenniferKitchens123
      @JenniferKitchens123 6 месяцев назад +1

      I am REALLY worried about China buying up land in the U.S. They may not attack physically, but they could absolutely cause havoc economically. So much of our products are purchased from China.

    • @paratroopdawg
      @paratroopdawg 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@JenniferKitchens123 We should be investing in Central and South American goods production for Chinese equivalent products that are cost prohibitive for US production. The logistics alone with Central and South American produced goods would be far more cost effective, plus building great ties with our hemisphere neighbors. Put politics aside, as we do with China anyway, and build an economic neighborhood, such that countries like Russia and China no longer matter.

    • @_Jake.From.Statefarm_
      @_Jake.From.Statefarm_ 5 месяцев назад

      Lmao assuming the US government doesn't know about anything and everything China is doing is laughable at best... Attacks happen, things slip through the cracks, but the NSA,CIA,etc are as powerful as they are for a reason.

  • @stonedriver9298
    @stonedriver9298 4 месяца назад

    Fear not friend. We love Ireland. Actually we love most of the world. We would never do this.