Is Removing Fr. Marko Rupnik’s Art the Christian Response? | EWTN News In Depth June 28, 2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июн 2024
- After the head of Vatican Communications recently defended the use of disgraced mosaic artist Fr. Marko Rupnik’s art - Fr. Thomas Petri, O.P. of the Dominican House of Studies gives his opinion on how the Church should respond.
------------
Hosted by Catherine Hadro, EWTN News In Depth welcomes guests in a discussion of current events in the Church, politics, and culture, all through the lens of the Catholic faith.
This show is about finding out who we are as people and as Catholics, and how we can confidently live our faith in the world. It is produced by EWTN News: www.ewtnnews.com
-------------
EWTN News In Depth airs on EWTN Fridays at 8pm ET. It re-airs on Saturdays at 1am ET & Sundays at 11am ET
------------
Sign up today to receive the EWTN News In Depth newsletter:
www.ewtn.com/indepth
-------------
Follow EWTN News In Depth on Social Media:
Facebook: / ewtnnewsindepth
Twitter: / ewtnnewsindepth
Instagram: / ewtnnewsindepth
-------------
Subscribe to EWTN RUclips channel here:
/ ewtn
-------------
You can support the EWTN News mission:
bit.ly/3qDR1qf
His art style with the eyes is eerie.
Yes! Please completely remove the “work” of that person. Peace.
Rupnik's work is ugly, formulaic, and shallow. It should be removed regardless of whether the artist is a pervert.
What I would have said, but better put. Thanks!
It is nauseating to see Rupnik’s “art” work in some catholic churches and religious pamphlets! It is wrong to keep using them, that is indirect endorsement of Rupnik himself
Finally some serious discussion on this disgusting art and it's evil creator Mario Rupnik. It's hard to imagine why it's taken so long to reach this point to remove his art. May Cardinal Sean O'Malley do the right thing and pursue this to the end for the sake of the Church and for justice for the Sisters. Sadly the Holy Father is deaf and blinded about this abuse concerning his confiere Mario Rupnik and is unwilling to remove Rupnik and his artwork. Furthermore let his Jesuit community be responsible for the financial cost of the removal and not the laity or the respective Shrines.
O'Malley is useless. When abortion advocate Ted Kennedy died, O'Malley said the funeral Mass himself in the chief Boston cathedral, thus putting his stamp of approval on Kennedy's life and acts. A Catholic funeral for Kennedy yes. But not in a cathedral or by O'Malley
Abuse is abuse. It's a disgrace to show partially between different kinds of abuse.
Take it down please
We cannot compromise with evil re: Church art. It matters too much to dismiss as too expensive to replace.
Way to go EWTN not shying away from uncomfortable questions!! There's no reason to avoid shaming the predator and his enablers and defenders!
It's only my opinion but Fr Rupnik's art even apart from his person is not worthy of representing holy things. It is simply not good enough. His work is only so widely distributed due to his network of enablers.
Dear Our Lady Lourdes please protect your shrine from all harms and dangers. We all need this shrine for healing and nany miracles taking place everyday day. I especially follow the Rosary devotion everyday from Lourdes. Do not let anyone destroy it. The force of satan are stronger than ever now
Shocking! Those words coming from the Head of Communication of Vatican?
There is nothing sacred of the work of the helper of the devil.
Remember: Francis embraced the man who made the crucifix in urine “art”! But not Cardinals Zen, Burke, et al
100% but real traditional artists he snubs
Caravaggio murdered someone, yet his art is sublime.
But it has a shadow to it, it does not make you want to worship like looking at la Pieta from Michelangelo does.
Yeah St Peters was built using funds collected as a result of wrongly confusing Christendom in Europe to buy their place in heaven. Let the bishops do a cleansing mass where wherever his art is. Guilty or not.
after all this time is his case still under investigation? ! what’s taking forever to find him guilty and thereby be defrocked and all his art taken down from holy places
The art should be removed because it's creepy and ugly. I cannot for life of me understand how its become ubiquitous in some our of churches. It's a mockery of the Byzantine style that we should be treasuring more.
His excommunication was related to confession.
I have always wondered, those that are abused, why don't they ever report it immediately rather than years, decades later or after the accuser has passed away. As for the murals, there's so much worse in the world and why don't people say anything? Hmm!!Just saying!
Another point, the Catholic Church is always under attack and yet other denominations are worse as I have seen. 🤔🤷♀️🤔🤷♀️ There's quite a few murals around the country so why is it that people are now complaining about these ones after some have been PROBABLY admired without even really looking??
There's quite a bit to discuss.
The world needs prayer and we need to really pray more cause this world is definitely headed in the wrong direction and it's sad and fearful.
Seriously?
Ordinarily l’d say no-One doesn’t tell galleries what to do-but a world
Famous shrine like Fatima or Lourdes? Yes. Under these peculiar and extremely creepy circumstances l would wonder if the depraved nature of the artist, the prominent placement in areas dedicated to holiness and purity and the potential for spiritual conflict would allow for leaving them in place. I am myself an artist and a Catholic. I agree with the speaker and hope to see them removed. Thank you.
And get Viggano got excommunicated in record time for defending TLM…
Puritanism is a heresy... It's against virtues. Scrupulosity is a sin and that makes people exaggerate and that is very common with TLM. It makes people accuse very easily others and themselves. Scrupulosity is not from God
No, for being schismatic
@@anthonyhulse1248 no for being disobedient. Francis and Fernandez are schismatic, there's a difference.
stop spreading american culture, only americans take "pride" that in work of God. it's prob a sinful association.. you should not sell the artist for God's work, so when audiences see them, they see Jesus, not the artist.
Etwas eigenartig Min. 0:44 die Augen, Augenbrauen, Nase der Sprecherin und das daneben...
The artwork is not offensive in itself and should remain.The author obviously had issues but so did Caravagio and Michael Angelo and a number of other religious artists. We should be more concerned about Pope Francis and his support for Fr. James Martin and the gay homosexual agenda.
The "artwork" should not remain. It's as shallow as the the guitar music and sappy lyrics which have polluted the Novus Ordo Mass.
If The "Art" is sacrilegious then it's not sacred.