Why this BM 21 Grad Rocket Launcher from the 1960s is still in service & How it works

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 дек 2024

Комментарии • 572

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  Год назад +37

    Comments from our Viewers
    Cost of the Rocket.
    Credits "Burning Sinner"
    These rockets are actually $350-450 a pop for all non-guided ones.
    Well, russian military doesn't pay the export pricetag for anything. My numbers are essentially 2004 (Nothing to see here, officer, 15 years has passed) price tags adjusted for inflation (In Russia, you have global multipliers rolled down by the feds. Feds never pay more than infation adjustment rates, that's why inflation rate is one piece of data you can actually trust on, every factory depending on the government lives and dies by these multipliers).
    These don't adjust for new tech though. Laser cutting should have sliced the prices significantly (Bulk of the price for HEFI rockets is for all the thin rods being cut into ready-made fragments. I know that new rods are cut with lasers, but I no longer involved in the system to give you the exact numbers on the internal math).
    "Георгий Тимофеевский
    "
    I heard a claim that grad missiles costed (in 2005) costed 6000 to 60000 roubles, which was like 200 to 2000 dollars. So, the price in your video seems like the upper boundary

    • @nehorlavazapalka
      @nehorlavazapalka Год назад +2

      No way these missiles are 400 $ in 2022 prices. Just the material (70 kg) will cost about that much.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      @@nehorlavazapalka russian militarry data are in a very grey area-we are also confused .

    • @burningsinner1132
      @burningsinner1132 Год назад +7

      @@nehorlavazapalka That's where you are wrong though. We russians don't buy stuff on the market unless it's needed. And nobody get to sell on external markets unless he meets agreed upon internal demands. The access to external markets is something you work really, really hard for if you were unlucky to think of starting your bussiness in the wrong prospect. Growing and selling flowers is nice and dandy. Growing beets? Uh-oh, you better not hit that truckload volume unless you want to be regulated to hell and back since we produce sugar from beets and sugar is considered to be strategic resourse. Get ready to sell good chunk to the government at government prices too.
      Missile consist of 20.5kg of long artillery powder (It's about 3 dollars per kilo), 20 dollar fuse, roughly 6.4kg of explosives (Varies by type, but we talk about RDX levels of affordability, about 16 dollars per kilo. Rest is the work, the rods and the pipe. Rod is about 4 kg worth at $0.96/kg and pipe is roughly $0.75/kg
      All in all, for materials, you get $216 dollars. Rest is the work, assembly and very low profit margin
      Explosives - 102 dollars
      Powder - 61,5 dollars
      Fuse - 20 dollars (Produced by dedicated gov facility, price is non-negotiable)
      Rods - 3,84 dollars
      Pipe - 28,5 dollars.
      That's one thing people seem to fail to understand - when it comes to anything even remotely vital to the gov, market prices stop working because market stops working. USSR may have fallen, but we are essentially in state capitalism now. It gets to the point where we pay about $150/month for all our utilities and $5 dollar for our internet plan because basic needs coverage is NOT exactly considered non-government matter.

    • @carkawalakhatulistiwa
      @carkawalakhatulistiwa Год назад

      @@Aitelly ak 47 in roket bm21

    • @yankoyankov7457
      @yankoyankov7457 Год назад

      I saw a Russian documentary on RUclips. 5hey were talking about 120 roubles in soviets times

  • @deven6518
    @deven6518 Год назад +153

    Keep in mind 2000 is an export/sale price, meaning it costs the manufacturing country far less for domestic acquisition

    • @mrobocop1666
      @mrobocop1666 Год назад +39

      Domestic cost of Russian missiles are 4-12 times cheaper than export price depending on model.
      So Russia basically can spam millions of grad missiles with affordable cost

    • @jonasstahl9826
      @jonasstahl9826 Год назад +18

      @@mrobocop1666 Given that a rocket weighs probably about 100kg they are cheaper than pork meat.

    • @boopitywoop7981
      @boopitywoop7981 Год назад

      Literally happening in real life
      They fire a barrage of BM21 then the irondome intercept all this dumb missiles

    • @recobozzor628
      @recobozzor628 Год назад +27

      @@boopitywoop7981 , you are watching too many movies. GET REAL with the irondome LMAO

    • @thetruthsayer8347
      @thetruthsayer8347 Год назад +5

      Russia also view Russian soldiers as a cheaply built missile; very disposable.

  • @BHuang92
    @BHuang92 Год назад +156

    Very effective way to delete a wide margin of area.........

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +15

      Yes it was meant to create chaos and destruction

    • @vandasaragosa
      @vandasaragosa Год назад +6

      "Delete" 😂😂🤣😭🖕

    • @mrwood4557
      @mrwood4557 Год назад +1

      @@zero-su3un keeps your head down, so they can attack

    • @mohammadshehada267
      @mohammadshehada267 Год назад +27

      @@zero-su3un “small rockets , wouldn’t do a lot of damage” 😂😂 it is 122MM rocket it is as big as a howitzer , and btw 155MM howitzer have mostly 5/7 Kg of TNT this rocket have 25 Kg of TNT and there is 40 rocket 🤣🤣

  • @Dimology
    @Dimology Год назад +199

    i was a kid during Yugoslav wars and my hometown was often shelled with MLRS. Yugoslav army was using 8x4 128mm HE, 32 missile system.
    It's the scariest thing you can hear on the reciving end. The sound of firing comes faster then the missiles and then you can just count and hope it wont hit your house. Has enough explosive to destroy a brick house and two of my close neighbours lost their houses from it. Really scary shit...

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +42

      Sorry to hear that.
      War is Horrendous and the collateral damage is not great at all

    • @Artes451
      @Artes451 Год назад +18

      My hometown suffers this every night for 5 months now, russians are shelling us with this thing and it is scary. Those bastards shelled us yesterday exactly on the new year as a sort of messed up joke, they hit the number of homes in our neighborhood, one of the shells hit residential building right in front of my windows, explosions were so lound that my family and I believed that this is it, our end, luckily no one was hurt, not even wounded just homes and apartments damaged. But everybody in our town is terrified, a lot of people here were killed or maimed by russian BM-21s for these past months.

    • @bastikolaski8111
      @bastikolaski8111 Год назад +99

      @@Artes451 sounds like the situation in Donbass in the last 8 years

    • @surplus2720
      @surplus2720 Год назад

      The problem is when u don't ear it coming... Pretty sure your neighborhood didn't ear the whiste/screaming noise of grads coming onto them

    • @micindir4213
      @micindir4213 Год назад +22

      @@bastikolaski8111 8 years of BM 21 work in Donbas vs 3 months of BM 21 work in Mariupol

  • @biamboibifuro817
    @biamboibifuro817 Год назад +260

    The only thing worse than a BM-21 is more than 1 of them working together.

    • @alanxu3936
      @alanxu3936 Год назад +4

      And a few drones to spot the enemy and guide the rockets closer to their intended target.

    • @Iamabot4708
      @Iamabot4708 Год назад

      Said no one on the receiving end of a strike

    • @A-10Thunderbolt-lk7ul
      @A-10Thunderbolt-lk7ul 10 месяцев назад +1

      Or a Tos-1

    • @Rylanor_The_Unyielding_31
      @Rylanor_The_Unyielding_31 10 месяцев назад +5

      @@Iamabot4708 4 or 5 of these can level a city block with relative ease

    • @SRB.4S
      @SRB.4S 2 месяца назад

      The OLD BM-21 Grad has a range of 20km. But the improved new version of this system under the name TORNADO G. It has a range of over 40km, more than double the BM-21. And it has new opto-electronics, inertial/GPS and Glonas navigation. And everything is done from the truck, there is no need to mechanically calculate the parameters... Although this possibility is kept just in case. So the system remained simple, only twice as deadly and still cheap to operate and maintain.

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  Год назад +38

    Happy New Year and a Belated Christmas
    Please Subscribe to help us produce more content.

  • @aeolus75
    @aeolus75 Год назад +95

    Grads falling over our heads was very often in Beirut in the 80s. I survived many, the sound it makes when passing over is scary, and you can hear each explosion approaching closer and closer to your basic shelter (a kitchen or a ground floor of a building)

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +5

      who fired ?

    • @aeolus75
      @aeolus75 Год назад +11

      @@Aitelly mainly Syrian army who occupied a big part of Lebanon back then, my "clan" where the resistance against that occupation.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +12

      @@aeolus75 Glad to know some one like you who had faced War first hand.
      I only know about War as my Gradfather Fought with the British Army in World War 2.
      He told me he was afraid at first but when he was under fire,survival Instinsts kicks in.

    • @aeolus75
      @aeolus75 Год назад +8

      @AiTelly and for all civilisations, currently living the tyranny of an occupation, we repeat Sir Winston Churchill words "we shall never surrender"
      PS: we used to call Grads "Orgues De Staline" in French 😉

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Год назад +4

      @@aeolus75 orgues of Stalin usually call Katusha mlrs for her sound.

  • @alek9195
    @alek9195 Год назад +44

    BM 21 is designed to destroy enemy concentration points. It was constructed at a time when real wars were being fought. Larger armies.

  • @imrekalman9044
    @imrekalman9044 Год назад +46

    Fun fact:
    In every Russian/Soviet Tank and Motor Rifle (mechanised infantry) Division there is an artillery regiment, which contains a rocket artillery battalion with 18 BM-21 Grad launchers, 3 batteries with 6 launchers each. Some Motor Rifle brigades also have a Grad battalion.

  • @Pathenic
    @Pathenic Год назад +147

    Russian solider here
    Grad is produced still by now, but new versions are called "Tornado-G". They have crucial upgrades which make this system more capable: new system of calculation of target (computer instead of a "dude with ballistic calculator", hence crew now is 2 men instead of 3), new chassis, faster timing of preparation for fire and leaving after it, and new missiles, three types. First - with larger range (up to 40 km), second - precision guided (by GLONASS as a Russian GPS, basically GMLRS but smaller), and third with cluster anti-tank munitions (small cumulative granades)

    • @kiraxxxxxxxxx
      @kiraxxxxxxxxx Год назад +33

      Glonass only gives schools and hospital locations.

    • @lumberjackagies5158
      @lumberjackagies5158 Год назад +140

      @@kiraxxxxxxxxx which apparently are the favourite places for the enemy to hide

    • @kiraxxxxxxxxx
      @kiraxxxxxxxxx Год назад +12

      @@lumberjackagies5158 ruSSia shouldn't invade a sovereign country, so the blame is to put to those nazis.

    • @lumberjackagies5158
      @lumberjackagies5158 Год назад +70

      @@kiraxxxxxxxxx nazi germany was a sovereign country as well 😜😜. Since when is sovereignty an excuse

    • @Pathenic
      @Pathenic Год назад +62

      @@kiraxxxxxxxxx cry more, I'm here fighting and everything you can do is whine in comments

  • @surplus2720
    @surplus2720 Год назад +45

    Got the pleasure to travel in an old camperized 6x6 soviet surplus Ural... They are simply unstoppable, desert, mud, snow, ice... Even whit a basically an house on his back we managed to go in some nasty zones... Beautiful machine

    • @milostvhd
      @milostvhd Год назад

      @@karolgolacik4943 You ever drived in Ural,no i dont think so

  • @Lemaure44
    @Lemaure44 Год назад +63

    This system was first used in 1969 during the Sino-Soviet Border Conflict.
    He demonstrated his effectiveness by eradicating any Chinese presence from Zhenbao Island.

    • @АланМагометовичИсаев
      @АланМагометовичИсаев Год назад +25

      Остров Даманский.

    • @VHS300
      @VHS300 Год назад +2

      Прикурили тогда знатно,у меня дядя там был,выжгли вообще всё.
      После обстрела с этого старичка минометный обстрел кажется детской забавой.

  • @googleplex1589
    @googleplex1589 Год назад +77

    Himars is for striking an ammo or even a sam site meaning it has accurate yet very limited fire. While this bad boy has not so good accuracy but covers huge swathes of land and if used in pairs or even in a group of 3 or 4 this can clear neighborhoods in urban combat.

    • @ares8866
      @ares8866 Год назад +15

      These are not vehicles of the same category. This is a vehicle with 122 mm. While Himars is 262 mm. Also, many versions of the Grad have guided ammunition.

    • @googleplex1589
      @googleplex1589 Год назад +3

      @@ares8866 You are definitely correct but some say that this is trash in comparison to HIMARS. Each is special in its role.

    • @ares8866
      @ares8866 Год назад +24

      @@googleplex1589 Those who say that have no idea what they are talking about.
      They don't even know the difference between the systems. I would say it's the other way around though. The economy of BM 21 is far greater than Himars.

    • @googleplex1589
      @googleplex1589 Год назад +1

      @@ares8866 Yes that is correct. But Himars is also perfect.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Год назад +9

      @@googleplex1589 the high cost and limited Salvo of the himars has been resulting in mist of its missiles being intercepted, unless there is no short range air defense or the target isn't cost effective to protect. With the grad, smerch and other systems of their group, guided or unguided, they have enough projectiles to overwhelm almost any air defense. Like, which AA system has 40 missiles on tap? When there's multiple units too, and whats the cost of stopping all that? There are very few systems with cheap enough projectiles to even consider defending against them

  • @bmmmohammad1979
    @bmmmohammad1979 6 месяцев назад +2

    Great video, but the value of a 122 mm highly explosive Grad missile is $650, not $2000.

  • @terrynewsome6698
    @terrynewsome6698 Год назад +15

    The himar is a 70km sniper rifle, the grad is a 3 tone machine gun.

    • @andrejaga3003
      @andrejaga3003 Год назад +5

      Where the Russians are actively blocking GPS, Himars is useless. And many more Himars missiles were shot down by Russian air defense. Ukraine first shoots a hurricane, then Himars. This is the only tactic that works.

    • @terrynewsome6698
      @terrynewsome6698 Год назад +8

      @@andrejaga3003 no, no they aren't
      1) GPS jamming doesn't work because the missile has internal guidance
      2) there is no successful example of a s-400 intercepting a m31, plenty to the contrary with the kherson bridge.
      3) the grad storm to overload counter battery fire radars computers, so that the himar doesn't give away its position.
      Simply put the himar system saw the Russian artillery greatly weakened and saw kherson retaken.

    • @zenon1261
      @zenon1261 Год назад +5

      @@terrynewsome6698 Ukraine struck multiple ammo reserves with the HIMARS in Kherson and if you couple that with the fact that it's hard as hell to get a supply chain going in Kherson from the russian's POV it's understandable why they gave up Kherson and chose to preserve their manpower and did a total withdrawal.

    • @terrynewsome6698
      @terrynewsome6698 Год назад +2

      @@zenon1261 exactly why the himar won kherson. Armies need food, ammo, and fuel to fight, and himar denied Russians all of that.

    • @andrejaga3003
      @andrejaga3003 Год назад +3

      @@terrynewsome6698 The Russian Department of Defense reports are blocking, but if you find them, they regularly report how many Himars missiles the air defenses have destroyed. 6 missiles are easy to intercept, but they are very expensive. Therefore, the Ukrainians fire Typhoon missiles to distract the air defense, and then Himars. The Russians left Kherson because the Ukrainians shelled the dam every day. It survived because it was built by the Soviets with a large margin of safety. But if the Nazis had succeeded in destroying it, a lot of land would have been flooded in 2 hours, thousands of people would have died. Now Himars are actively used to shell Donetsk, but the Western media are silent about this.

  • @Younoggww
    @Younoggww Год назад +6

    Ur channel is way to underrated.I love the info that you share

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Glad you think so!

  • @beesmarter9348
    @beesmarter9348 Год назад +3

    Thank God I found this channel. Is is very amazing to understand everything in such a beautiful way.

  • @topg_napoleon5203
    @topg_napoleon5203 Год назад +7

    Amazing video as always 👌🏻🥇🔥

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks 🙏👍

  • @javidmurvatovYT
    @javidmurvatovYT Год назад +11

    Please next make a video about the Russian mortar system 2B9 "Vaselyok"

  • @topaielsani5485
    @topaielsani5485 Год назад +1

    I think bm -21 world best mlrs system 😊😊

  • @puneethpalan272
    @puneethpalan272 Год назад +1

    Greetings from India .........we had used these Grads 21 during Kargil war 20 years back ....the punch of these missiles obliterated the montain top ,the enemy on it and their bunkers into oblivion ....awesome Russian equipment .....

    • @Gamingbotofficial739
      @Gamingbotofficial739 6 месяцев назад

      Lies.
      Pakistan has similar systems with indigenous rockets and stabilizers .
      And secondly you could not take kargil back until UNO ordered akistan to pull out its army from kargil.
      Same happened in 1948-49 n 1965 wars. You guys ran to UN and ran away to Russia(Tashkent) in 65 in order to beg to stop the war.

  • @privatesocialhandle
    @privatesocialhandle Год назад +3

    I Iove your videos. But I would like chime in with my personal opinion on why this system is still in use and so effective. I know you mentioned the cost of the rocket and damage it can output compared to that cost. In addition to that, and I think is the "hero" part of the system, is the truck itself. These trucks have 3 plus points:
    1. Cost: the truck itself is so damn cheap compared to armed options in term of production, operation, and maintenance.
    2. Mobility: these trucks can literally go anywhere.
    3. Durability: not only these trucks can go anywhy, but the can endure the journey.
    Great video as always.

  • @GoingBallistic
    @GoingBallistic Год назад +2

    Awesome video. Keep up the good work.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Thank you so much for your comments.
      Means a lot to a small channel like ours.

    • @GoingBallistic
      @GoingBallistic Год назад +1

      @@Aitelly I’m not that much bigger so us small channels have to work together

  • @beesmarter9348
    @beesmarter9348 Год назад +7

    This channel deserve Billions of subscribers.. look at the amazing work they do

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the kind words 👍

  • @ntnt6557
    @ntnt6557 Год назад +2

    Got one of these directly in my house in april. Quarter of house is vanished, but it's still standing. Tho the surrounding houses are grounded in 1km radius

  • @heavent883
    @heavent883 Год назад +2

    In 1998 Ethiopian and Eritrean border war happen, every time the Ethiopians invaded with their large soldiers, the Eritreans used this and artillery to stop the invasion and it worked, in the end, the Ethiopians lost over 123,000 soldiers and Eritreans lost 19,000 soldiers.

  • @FBI-UIU
    @FBI-UIU Год назад +2

    Our country has a lot of those things! It is a great help that they fought side by side with us during the Cambodia-Thailand conflict over Preah Vihear Temple. and now seeing this, it sure did bring back memories.

  • @javidmurvatovYT
    @javidmurvatovYT Год назад +3

    I have had requested this.Thank you!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      We listen to all your request.
      But 3D animation and Rendering takes a lot of time to Produce

    • @javidmurvatovYT
      @javidmurvatovYT Год назад +1

      I understand and the final results are very good!

  • @DIOS-M
    @DIOS-M Год назад +8

    The car shown in the video is already an upgraded version, it differs from the old Grad version, which has a different caliber and other characteristics

  • @lancerevo9747
    @lancerevo9747 Год назад +30

    Glad I just discovered this channel, new sub here! Please can you make a video on the Tornado-S missile launcher and compare with the HIMARS? I hear both systems are very comparable.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +4

      Glad you like it.
      And thanks for hitting the Subscribe button ✅

    • @themilosgrozni237
      @themilosgrozni237 Год назад +4

      HIMARS is somewhat similar to tornado.( depending on a munition/rocket that you use ).
      actually HIMARS is not just artillery...but rather a cross over between artillery and tactical balistic missile system.
      so artillery part of HIMARS is similar to torado and smerch....but tactical balistic missile munition for HIMARS is more comparable to ISKANDER

    • @igorvasin6960
      @igorvasin6960 Год назад +1

      @@mal.3855 it makes no sense to compare HIMARS with BM_21. these were the first simplified MLRS after which they produced heavier and more accurate systems, Tornado-S and Tornado-G. 'Hurricane', 'Smerch' and 'Grad'. The Iskander, for example, has two long-range missiles and is comparable to the HIMARS with two missiles. in general, MLRS installations were invented in the first 1940 years by Soviet engineers to fight the German Nazis.

    • @mostlymessingabout
      @mostlymessingabout Год назад

      @@mal.3855 Russians also have guided Smerch now as well. So should be comparable. They have slightly longer range as well so will be safer.

    • @lancerevo9747
      @lancerevo9747 Год назад +14

      @@mal.3855 would you call Wikipedia "pro Russian"? The Wikipedia-quoted specs of the Tornado-S actually supercede HIMARS in range and warhead size. And GLONASS is just as good as GPS in precision of coordinate determination.

  • @dirckthedork-knight1201
    @dirckthedork-knight1201 Год назад +3

    You just got yourself a new subscriber i am looking forward to seeing you cover the Pantsir and the Lancet

  • @jonm2416
    @jonm2416 Год назад

    I LOVE this concise and to the point format!!!

  • @ivan1kot
    @ivan1kot Год назад +5

    Thank you for an amazing content! Very informative and a brlliant quality as always.

  • @Darkosa1234
    @Darkosa1234 Год назад +4

    Great work as always!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Glad you like it 👍

  • @debarpitchandan2026
    @debarpitchandan2026 Год назад +2

    Loving your content. Came to your channel with the Arjun Tank video and loving even this. Keep it up

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Thanks for coming

  • @Creamypie626
    @Creamypie626 Год назад +1

    Just one thing. Missile means the rocket has some Form of guidance system. Rockets are unguided. Calling an unguided Rocket a missile is like calling the Nokia 3310 an android phone.

  • @aa1944-k2r
    @aa1944-k2r Год назад +4

    the latest variant of the BM21 is tornado G, I think it has more range and option of guided rockets

  • @donlucchese7280
    @donlucchese7280 Год назад +2

    AI is awesome. Nice quality editing AiTelly. Keep up with good work.

  • @tomokazu2235
    @tomokazu2235 Год назад +2

    I've been a fan of this channel since I saw the panzer 3 video. Glad I found this channel it was great

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Glad you are with us from the start

  • @AnilArya51
    @AnilArya51 Год назад +2

    Thanks for the new year gift 😀 Happy New Year AiTELLY

  • @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085
    @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 Год назад +8

    even though it was made in an old year, the BM-21 Grad rocket launcher machine is the main choice for countries that want multiple rocket launchers,
    this machine has succeeded in becoming an icon and has its own share, recorded users from most of the countries of Eastern Europe and the Middle East to almost countries on the continent of Africa and most of the countries in South Asia choose BM-21 Grad, and there are several countries in South America that also use it,
    BM stands for boyevaya mashina, and the nickname grad means "hail",
    even though it's old but has become an icon, although old but still muscular and deadly
    Thanks to AiTelly for making this very informative video
    Merci.... Barvo...AiTelly 👌😉👍👍

    • @Putinsky_ORC
      @Putinsky_ORC Год назад

      Не старый,а опытный

    • @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085
      @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 Год назад

      @@Putinsky_ORC can you written on english, please ??

    • @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085
      @sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 Год назад

      @@Putinsky_ORC besides, I also no longer subscribe or liked to this channel, well the reason is because it is too in favor of the western block, even though outside the western block there are also many interesting things to review, such as from Israel and France but until now it has not been made at all, even though this is an educational channel, not a westernized propaganda channel,
      but well cause you contacting me i try to response you, but i'm sorry I didnt understand your language, that's why meybe you can written on english

    • @Putinsky_ORC
      @Putinsky_ORC Год назад

      @@sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 i dont speak english

    • @Putinsky_ORC
      @Putinsky_ORC Год назад

      ​@@sejauhtimurdaribarat7085 you don't have push "translate to english"?

  • @rustoontgaming4803
    @rustoontgaming4803 Год назад +2

    Congratulations on 100k subscribers 🎉♥️

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks we will always remain Humble to the Audience for helping us reach this goal in 5 moths.

  • @efz629
    @efz629 Год назад +4

    There´s a slight error concerning BM21 construction.
    In 01:04 both elevation and traverse are adjusted with same hand crank. First you just have to choose which one you are performing with "knob" on the right end of hand crank axel.
    Still, video is great! Thanks!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +5

      Thanks for the Feedback

  • @dudewithabalaclava5094
    @dudewithabalaclava5094 Год назад +1

    "Oh no they are shooting at us, get under the table"

  • @burningsinner1132
    @burningsinner1132 Год назад +2

    These rockets are actually $350-450 a pop for all non-guided ones. So yeah, full salvo of these bad boys is cheaper than the gear of one supatacticool safari hunter it vaporizes.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Great info. but i guess the considering the export version it might touch the $1000 mark

    • @burningsinner1132
      @burningsinner1132 Год назад +1

      @@Aitelly Well, russian military doesn't pay the export pricetag for anything. My numbers are essentially 2004 (Nothing to see here, officer, 15 years has passed) price tags adjusted for inflation (In Russia, you have global multipliers rolled down by the feds. Feds never pay more than infation adjustment rates, that's why inflation rate is one piece of data you can actually trust on, every factory depending on the government lives and dies by these multipliers).
      These don't adjust for new tech though. Laser cutting should have sliced the prices significantly (Bulk of the price for HEFI rockets is for all the thin rods being cut into ready-made fragments. I know that new rods are cut with lasers, but I no longer involved in the system to give you the exact numbers on the internal math).

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      @@burningsinner1132 Very valuable Comment will keepthis in our Comment Correction Section

  • @thesaltbaron5733
    @thesaltbaron5733 Год назад +3

    Top quality video

  • @player1GR
    @player1GR Год назад +5

    by the way, it is the first stage (booster) of these missiles that appears in 99% of the photos on the Internet, with the inscription "a Russian missile hit the house / yard and fortunately did not explode"

    • @MrZlocktar
      @MrZlocktar Год назад

      spot on

    • @dimbasz
      @dimbasz Год назад

      From the photos I've seen it's usually SAM boosters, like BUK or S-300

    • @MrZlocktar
      @MrZlocktar Год назад

      @@dimbasz With Patriots missiles it will be really hard to put blame on Russia next time missile hits the house. You can't miss Patriot missile with S-300 or BUK.

  • @ΧριστοφοροςΛυμπερης-χ9π

    Can I ask how the rockets launch from the tubes more details please? 😢

  • @Toxic_Man_
    @Toxic_Man_ Год назад +2

    The first time the Soviets used it against the Chinese was in 69 on border conflicts! I don’t know what the Chinese felt at that moment

  • @ronjohnson5070
    @ronjohnson5070 Год назад

    Seeing footage of MLRS as a kid scared me just the sounds and fire coming at launch knowing there would be no safe place to hide

  • @mohammadshehada267
    @mohammadshehada267 Год назад +3

    BM-21 it looks like upgraded BM-13 so we could say we are using WW2 vehicle to this day 😂😂

    • @mikecimerian6913
      @mikecimerian6913 Год назад +2

      Tube artillery is just a stovepipe. It's the ordnance that matters.

    • @DNS-Freakz
      @DNS-Freakz Год назад

      Thats basically every weapon..

  • @MilanDrazic
    @MilanDrazic Год назад +3

    Finally someone who not spread propaganda

  • @ЮрийТитов-ю4ш
    @ЮрийТитов-ю4ш Год назад +2

    Я когда служил в армии был водителем bm 21 на базе грузовика Ural. По-сути это тоже самое, что водить обычный грузовик, но внутри салона автомобиля есть блок стрельбы похожий на коробку с кнопками. Почему вы о нем ничего не сказали?

  • @mdbiplopsorker6966
    @mdbiplopsorker6966 Год назад +1

    Happy new year brother 💗 I love your video,

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the Support 🙏

  • @theboywithaflowertattoo
    @theboywithaflowertattoo Год назад +2

    BM-21 is a beautiful machine.
    Not even fair to compare it to HIMARS.
    it’s really cool to see how the Ukrainians are using the Himars and BM-21 together with great success, to prevent interception of the more precious HIMARS payload.

  • @SRB.4S
    @SRB.4S 2 месяца назад

    The OLD BM-21 Grad has a range of 20km. But the improved new version of this system under the name TORNADO G. It has a range of over 40km, more than double the BM-21. And it has new opto-electronics, inertial/GPS and Glonas navigation. And everything is done from the truck, there is no need to mechanically calculate the parameters... Although this possibility is kept just in case. So the system remained simple, only twice as deadly and still cheap to operate and maintain.

  • @basti94
    @basti94 Год назад +3

    Why it is still in service? Because it's still lethal. What a question... Same as the ton's of vids like "Why WW2 weapons still in service in the ukranian war" WHY NOT? THEY ARE STILL KILLING!

  • @Lucius_murrius
    @Lucius_murrius Год назад

    Simple answer it's fun to launch and the sound are awesome .

  • @mohammadjuma4757
    @mohammadjuma4757 Год назад +1

    I wished for my info about the guidance of the rocket......I mean the stabilization how it achieved by fins and rifling/rotation

  • @Mr.Roztov
    @Mr.Roztov Год назад +1

    The bm 21 grad was created to bring chaos within 100 kilometers (or miles I don't remember) and it's missiles are cheap which is perfect for mass production

  • @sciencespectrum3855
    @sciencespectrum3855 Год назад +2

    Amazing video 😍

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      Thanks 🙏👍
      Glad you like it

  • @ERIKNOWAKK
    @ERIKNOWAKK Год назад +3

    Could you make video about how artillery aims? If we talk about the older ones? No modern computers

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      Let me research and let you know

    • @ERIKNOWAKK
      @ERIKNOWAKK Год назад +1

      @@Aitelly that would be really nice, i cant find any guides or anything with aim

  • @ГеоргийТимофеевский-х9х

    I heard a claim that grad missiles costed (in 2005) costed 6000 to 60000 roubles, which was like 200 to 2000 dollars. So, the price in your video seems like the upper boundary

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Your right ! but we are considering inflation and the export cost also.
      Honestly we do not the price but i believe it is Cheap

  • @hamzagamzatov2491
    @hamzagamzatov2491 Год назад +1

    Amazing details

  • @ashifabedin
    @ashifabedin Год назад +1

    Amazing video as always

  • @cherrypoptart2001
    @cherrypoptart2001 Год назад +3

    I watched a video about a foreign fighter who was describing his experience being shell by artillery , mortars, rockets on the frontlines and he said u mightnt get excited when a 82mm mortar lands near u, its like a big grenade going off, no massive explosion mainly a dust cloud but when the Russian 122s land near u everything shake up around and inside of you . This specific rocket has a little over 3x the explosive payload as a 125mm high explosive tank shell that both sides are using to destroy buildings and entrencements . Id rather take my chances with a modern mortar shell dropping near me then this landing anywhere near me lol

  • @amedeocestini
    @amedeocestini Год назад +3

    What if the BM-21 was adapted to launch the Switch Blade 300 and 600 in the tubes?

    • @nobodyfromnowhere3597
      @nobodyfromnowhere3597 Год назад

      Why? You are increasing the cost of ammunition for what? I think you are imagining it as if it fires it’s missiles and they go hunting for enemy targets. Too expensive and kind of pointless when I can carpet shell entire area.

  • @tusharrawat8232
    @tusharrawat8232 Год назад

    This is BM-21 and it can change the face of the war as this is the best machine to cause havoc in the enemy teams.

  • @komrad-o982
    @komrad-o982 Год назад +2

    Can I recommened the TOS-1 Burantino and it's Thermobaric ammunition and warhead

  • @ryanu6424
    @ryanu6424 Год назад +2

    Can you make video of how warship works? (Example model: Sejong the great class destroyer)

  • @ВасилийБорисенков-и3х

    Grad in Russian language means "Hail". It is elemental force that is crashing on the heads of enemies. This what it means

  • @Spacefacts_0
    @Spacefacts_0 Год назад +2

    Can you please do the Su 75 "Checkmate"

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +3

      Yes it is in our pipeline.
      Give us some time and we will get it done 👍

  • @emillio_gonzales
    @emillio_gonzales Год назад

    This system is very simple, it is easy to repair, one salvo has a good demoralizing and destructive effect. In addition, its use is very cheap. This is exactly what military equipment should be

  • @karthikeyakv4441
    @karthikeyakv4441 Год назад +2

    Please, make video on how NLAW missile work ?

  • @shouri-j
    @shouri-j Год назад +2

    Happy New Year . Please, upload videos on submarines.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Submarine ok will do.
      Give us time
      3D animation and Rendering takes time.

  • @NightVisio9m
    @NightVisio9m Год назад +2

    Like saying goes! Why change when it works😂

  • @ervinpfelicildaerloboy8419
    @ervinpfelicildaerloboy8419 Год назад +1

    Super great animation 👍😁😊

  • @DavidSerg
    @DavidSerg Год назад +2

    0:46 dont know were from you get prices from, but as i know in soviet forces all BM21 car cost less than 2k$, and rockets for it costs near 150mm artilery shells, it was mass in produse and lots of them was maded in USSR for free

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      It's the approximate price when it was exported to other nations.

    • @DavidSerg
      @DavidSerg Год назад

      @@Aitelly wow, not know that it costs so much on export. In post soviet countries its more like post cold war trash.

    • @jonasstahl9826
      @jonasstahl9826 Год назад

      @@DavidSerg On export they want to earn money and taxes,

  • @gamercoffee1906
    @gamercoffee1906 Год назад +1

    how can i get that?

  • @Giga_Chad_2281
    @Giga_Chad_2281 Год назад +4

    Do a video about T-90M if possible
    Edit: if possible about modern Russian tanks like T-72 and T-80 and and T-14 Armata

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      Yes Coming soon

  • @showjaymayhem
    @showjaymayhem 8 месяцев назад

    How exactly fire control deliver signal to inside missile guide?

  • @MrZlocktar
    @MrZlocktar Год назад +1

    HIMARS doesn't use PrSM because PrSM technology not in service yet. Additionally, PrSM missile will not enter service until 2023, and the upgraded seeker is expected to be part of a major program improvement planned for 2025.

  • @googleplex1589
    @googleplex1589 Год назад +2

    Beautiful video thanks and keep it up.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Glad you like it

  • @zexthelengendgaming731
    @zexthelengendgaming731 Год назад +2

    F-22 next plsss

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      Yes we got many requests for that.
      Will do a research on it.

  • @MrKamei
    @MrKamei Год назад +1

    great animation🔥🔥🔥

  • @Greekmilsim
    @Greekmilsim Год назад

    For low budget armies is the perfect option

  • @zincmaker
    @zincmaker Год назад

    не только на базе урала 375д, но и на базе урала 375. вес боевой части 27 кг ( могу ошибаться). наводчик один а не два . он же глядя в "панораму пг 1м" корректирует направляющие пакеты. есть по-мимо ручного и механический привод пакетов. стрельба осуществляется либо с кабины ( что не часто) но и с выносной катушки из укрытия, длина стандартного кабеля по-моему 60 метров.

  • @m_bat-f9l
    @m_bat-f9l Год назад

    Happy New Year, and thank you for the amazing content ! ✨️

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Happy new year!! to you too

  • @vikingnusantara
    @vikingnusantara Месяц назад

    :Enemy is coming from the north
    :Roger, deleting north

  • @Brightsideofmilitary
    @Brightsideofmilitary Год назад +1

    Nice video 100k soon

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the moral support 🙂

  • @yankoyankov7457
    @yankoyankov7457 Год назад

    In some russian documentary I saw, that they said , the rocket was low costed at 120 roubles soviets time 1970-80 's with low cost methods

  • @PVEgod1
    @PVEgod1 Год назад +1

    Max level katyusha lmao

  • @befamousornot
    @befamousornot Год назад +5

    rockets, not missiles since it is unguided

  • @Le_Blnk____
    @Le_Blnk____ Год назад +1

    You miss one the sound they make is pog

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      🙂🤔 Yes we did miss it.

  • @georgiebestmanutd4746
    @georgiebestmanutd4746 Год назад

    Bro, have u done any article on Katyusha rockets?

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Not yet - we have veryknowledge of this Rocket

  • @matthewwagner47
    @matthewwagner47 Год назад +4

    These weapons are being used effectively against fortified positions on both sides an Against civilian areas in eastern Ukraine by the UA.
    Drones are used for targeting 99% of the time.

  • @doritarded
    @doritarded Год назад +2

    Ah, Yes, The vehicle in the "moskau moskau" meme.

  • @kilotango6726
    @kilotango6726 Год назад

    I would love to see one on the TOS-1

  • @ayxanov81
    @ayxanov81 Год назад

    This is fun thing to use with 20x of them

  • @madzen112
    @madzen112 Год назад +1

    If only they had named it Chad...