@Satish Gupta What is your problem? That he did his PhD in Cambridge? He got into the University through his own steam. Not through reservation, I am sure. He used his own intelligence to decipher a code of over 2500 years. He did not use British intelligence. Where is British supremacy here? Rather he would have received a token or generous stipend from the University which he would not have here. Isn't he still Indian? Don't you feel proud for a compatriot's achievement? What is your problem?
Stupid people don’t understand that the finding will written in the name of Cambridge. There is no proud in india. Your future generations will be laughed at by saying that we had the treasures but we did not find it. This is a academic war which is lost by India.
Lol do you expect a non indian to crack the code? lol. Indians themselves don't understand sanskrit and you expect non-indians to understand the sanskrit grammar problem and also solve it lol
Hi, I am from the Philippines! I want to ask a question. For years now I want to understand the relationship between Sanskrit to the Laguna copperplate inscription. We learn how Hinduism comes from the Philippines, we even have more than 100+ borrowed words from Sanskrit that we still use to this day. As a Sanskrit student, I want to know from your perspective the historicity of the Baybayin alphabet because we never learn in school how the Sanskrit language made a huge contribution to how our current language Tagalog formed. Thank you for your answer! I am a linguistic enthusiast from the Philippines. Nice to meet you!
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 Currently, English is the intermediate language in every translation. If Sanskrit becomes the intermediate language, then it will be beneficial.
"I took break, cooked, swimmed, meditated and did not even touch books for a month". Mate, I have been applying your research technique for many years but still no resul 😃 Good job btw👍
He did mention that he had spent a lot of time and burned the midnight oil in the library on trying to solve the problem before taking the break. Both, hard work and relaxation are required to be successful - one cannot just go with too much of one and expect positive results!
I would first request you to make a video on what the algorithm is and how the traditional interpretation did not fit in and how your interpretation corrected it.
It is an eye opener. He had incisive thinking and thought outside the box to come up with this interpretation. Because we were taught the same thing by our teachers and we accepted it without questioning.
@@ricardoafonso7563 Hinduism even has a place for Nirishvarvaad and atheism. Ajivika, Charvaka, Buddhism and Jainism are the nastika schools of Sanatana thought.
विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् जब 'सपादसप्ताध्यायी ' के ऐसे दो सूत्र एक साथ एक ही स्थल पर कार्य करने के लिए उपस्थित हों , जिन्हें यदि हम एक जगह कार्य न करने दें , तो भी वे अन्यत्र कार्य कर सकें, इसे प्रतिषेध या तुल्य विरोध कहते हैं।और आप इसी सूत्र को गलत करने की चेष्टा कर रहे हैं। सर्वथा निन्दनीय है I
Panini's grammar (among other grammars of Sanskrit) is undoubtedly the most stunning example of structured (algorithmic) thinking and possibly the highest single human intellectual achievement of antiquity. It is delightful that this puzzle be solved by a student from a university that produced in the past the likes of Thomas Macaulay who had the wisdom to contend that "a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia." Cheers.
@@axed1176 that is why the commentator used the sentence "delightful to have student from the same university" as this student's discovery somehow contradicts Thomas's sayings
The way he described how he got to the solution out of blue after taking some break and keeping his mind away from the problem in the meantime is just so relatable to me. When we get heavily involved in our studies, brain doesn't get the chance to establish links right away between tidbits of information until we give it some time to do so. Then you start to view everything more clearly in the bigger picture
Einstein had the same experience during his life. 😊 He went away in a summer vacation and when came back made a big discovery out of the blue in a few days. 👍😀
आचार्य परंपरा का खंडन। ऐसे कैसे आप कोई भी बात को सिद्ध मान लेते है। प्रमाण चाहिए आचार्यों को खंडन करने के लिए भी प्रमाण चाहिए किसी भी मूर्ख के कहने पर आप आचार्य परंपरा को बदल देंगे विदेशी क्या किसी को प्रमाण देंगे अथवा क्या किसी को रिजल्ट देंगे कि कौन सही है कौन गलत है जिनको हिंदी भी नहीं आती राम+सु से राम क्या बनाना आ गया तो आप अपने आप को पानि नीय न समझ रहे हैं ऐसे पाणिनी हमारे हमारे भारतवर्ष में प्रत्येक गगुरुकुलो में हजारों भरे पड़े हैं
खरे आहे. एक महत्वाचे म्हणजे I kept all my books away for more than a month. नंतर फक्त चिंतन केले तर मार्ग सापडतो. भाष्यकारांंते वाट पुसतु हे माउलिंचे बरोबरच आहे. पण अनेकदा फक्त अशाच पद्धतिने राहिले तर मुळे विचाराना नेमस्तपणा येतो. नविन सापडत नाही. म्हणून अभ्यासाच्या ठराविक पातळीनंतर कधितरि जुने जाऊ द्या मरणालागुनि .....असे केले तरच केशवसुतांना सापडली तशी नवि तुतारी सापडते. आइन्स्टिननेही कधि असे म्हटलेचः मी (ठराविक पठडीत) शिकलो नाहि हे जास्त चांगले झाले।
Interestingly this is a similar issue that we see in the famous pacha-dhaatu.. there are other rules which say the successor and predecessor concept like we have in numbers... There are teachers who did figure this out but sadly no one bothered to document and no one dared to ask... Thank you, for formulating and adding here and spreading and publishing your knowledge... If we all were speaking Sanskrit the Natural Language Processing technology would have been way more advanced... I am happy and proud of you sir.
@@ExhaleYogaSchool you are righ. panini has compiled the grammar just like vyasa compiled vedas. For example vyasa and valmiki have done a large deal of literature way before panini. This timeline is because, there are scholars who propagated false info stating sanskrit is not older than Buddha. So this is a misinterpratation like Aryan theory..
I just have gone through an "analysis of his paper" by another scholar based in India. Since this is related to Sanskrit, it seems that there are many wrong assumptions by Rishi.
Actually there is no such unsolved problem in the vyakarana sastra.The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
this is really awesome and the feeling that people were wrong about something for 2500 years, and now you discovered truth, so many possibilities opened
I would like to point out that there was no "puzzle" per se in the first place. All the solutions/ interpretations given by katyayana and patanjali fit perfectly for all the sutras and derivations of ashtadhyayi. Now, you should've at least stated that it is an alternate method confined in its application as you've left out "aagamaas" conveniently as your alternate method doesn't work for them. The alternate idea that you've given in your thesis doesn't work properly even within the area that you've claimed, for eg at रामेभ्यः । There are many other instances where your theory doesn't work. Then how is it that you're making such big claims! Now coming to its applicability in the computer world, it would produce incorrect results as the alternate solution is limited and doesn't apply 100% in the claimed domain either. While your interest in sanskrit and the hard work is worth appreciation it is completely inappropriate to denounce the rishis without coming up with a wholesome idea yourself.
He hasn’t published his thesis yet. It would be good to go through it in detail and then critique it. Until then it wouldn’t hurt us to commend the effort and the very initiative of trying to explore the topic on the face-value of it.
Many congratulations to Dr. Rishi Rajpopat. His work has brought great pride to us Indians. May he comtinue these wonderful discoveries even after his PhD.
Finally - academic rigor instead of rhetoric is brought to the study of the ancient language. To be able to codify a language in 4000 rules shows the genius of Panini. And it took Dr.Rajpopat several years of hard work to put everything in place. A PhD from the University of Cambridge is no easy task - the thesis would be scrutinized, challenged and taken to pieces by the academicia before the PhD is granted. So congratulations to Dr.Rajpopat (understated). Unfortunately, we might have a lot of jealous folks trying to poke holes without even reading his paper...
🙏Before pointing finger at great Karthyaayana,kindly introspect yourselves,interact with present great scholars in our country , like Dr.K Vishnu Namboothiri etc and understand where you do stand 🙏
ओम। क्या आप बहुलम चंदसी,पूर्वत्र सिद्धम सूत्रों को नही जानते!? पूर्वपरणित्यन्तरङ्गापवदानां उत्तरोत्तरं बलीय ... यह एक परिभाषा है।इस के अनुसार एक स्थान मे दो से ज्यादा सूत्र आयेंगे तो उन में कौनसा सूत्र बलवान होता है बताया गया। बहुवचन झल्येत सूत्र का अपवाद अतो भिस ऐस् है।इसलिए यहा भिस की स्थान में ऐस आदेश होके मन्त्रैः बन गया।वेद मन्त्रो मे दिखने वाले शभरूप मन्त्रेभि:,कर्णेभिः ....के सिद्धि बहुलं छन्दसि से कर सकते है।
All the Shastra and ancient Indian knowledge needs a deep research and I'm pretty sure that it will gonna blow everyone's mind if we could understand all these ancient knowledge, Rishi hatts off to you for such amazing work you literally inspire many youths and other scholars too.
This is such a big achievement and that too in such a simple way! impressive!! Your knowledge of the root language and logical interpretation have greatly helped.
Every single Sanskrit word been understood and accounted for as taught by Sage Panini. Only thing is those who study Ashtadhyaayi, though small in numbers, don't come out and beat their chest. This discovery is just a tall claim about a topic which people at large of unaware of. Just because one is from Cambridge doesn't mean he is great and others are fools.
@@akshaysharma8940 sure. But try and study Ashtadhyaayi atleast a bit and then you'll understand the truth of this half baked discovery. If anyone to be celebrated in this context, its Sage Panini and later Acharyas like Patanjali who wrote Mahabhashya on Ashtadhyaayi and other Acharyas who built upon Ashtadhyaayi. All of them were unimaginable intellectual giants. One will understand this only when you study atleast a bit. Then you'll see how hollow is this half baked reasearch claim is and how silly is the celebration around it. Start studying now instead of basking on validation from a white man. Free yourself from intellectual slavery.
This is an occasion to celebrate an achievement of a young Indian scientist in the contemporary academic arena, not to compare with quiet scholars who kept things to themselves or who never bothered to solve it in open through any of the Indian universities. Expected a little more large heartedness.
Panini was never wrong, it is just that, he was misinterpreted maybe due to one faulty explanation by Katyayana, and later people never raised fingers on it. Thanks for the renewed interpretation. Please share the Thesis PDF! And may I know, what was the explanation of Patanjali on this.
The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
Sanskrit is called as the language of Devta i.e.devine language. This breakthrough should be fruitfully utilised in computer language and be beneficially utilised.
नमस्कार आपके द्वारा दी गई जानकारी बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है। ख़ुशी हुई आपको सुनकर कि आप विदेश में रह कर भी भारतीय संस्कृति को आगे बढ़ाने का कार्य कर रहे हैं। क्या आप कैंब्रिज में मेरे लिए ऐसी जानकारी से सम्बन्ध रखती कोई किताब खोज सकते हैं जिसमे भारतीय गुण सूत्र व्यवस्था (Genetics marriages) के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया हो? कोशिश कीजिएगा अगर मिल जाये तो। भारत के प्राचीन इतिहास में Genetics improvement बहुत काम हुआ है।
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 From what I understand, they want to build AI which can think clearly and sanskrutam is the perfect language because it never has double meaning of a particular sentence.. like english or any other language
@@moneymaker3456 sanskrit language and paninian grammatical structures are special in the fact that every word carries the contextual meta-data along with it. So there no ambiguity when extracting meaning. In English: we have two sentences "I am going to Bombay" and "I am going to eat". Only the last word changes, and changes entire context as bombay is a place while eat is an action. But in sanskrit every word carries in it, its tense, person, quantity, case, etc. So even if the word positions are changed in a sentence, the meaning doesnt change. What AI/ML NLP programs try to do, is to build context meta-data over other natural languages like english which lack such inbuild mechanism, and then further learn the rules to extract meaning.
Congratulations 🍾 This is exciting news! I understand the need for a break as a means to reset and attain clarity! Way to go, happy for you and this discovery!
Poor Panini has gone misunderstood for 2500 years.... He must be thinking "Arre yaar, why did I not make it crystal clear when I wrote my rulebook..." Until Dr. Rajpopat arrives on the scene and takes a one month holiday. Interesting how even Katyayana, who came after Panini, seems to have fallen for this misunderstanding. So the two probably never met. Or maybe Katyayana's mistake spilled on to everyone who followed?
@sudo2998 Panini Rishi was much more rich then you or any 21st century person in terms of Knowledge. And may be Katyayana intentionally misinterpret ate so that poor generations like us who don't know how to respect gurus and senior scholars should be misguided from the real knowledge of Panini Rishi. Because modern education only teaches how to exploit!!
Can you please make a more detailed video with a simplified explanation of what the problem was, what you have achieved, and also one more thing. You said your solution solves the problem without exception. So, does that mean if you apply the older version, you come up with errors? a slightly detailed comparison will be great.
It's the meaning of this paribhasa sutra as applied in the case of conflict of two vidhi sutras, Katyayana's interpretation that 'para' meaning the vidhi sutra number which is later in the serial order is chosen, this interpretation is found to be producing gaurava not laghava.
@@dhiren26 Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
. We studied Sanskrit .. Class 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... old Cambridge Schools in India .. until 1976 .......perhaps stopped being taught after that .......glad Cambridge University continues the subject .
Now when we can know the Root word by this Sutra.. i hope we will be able to accurately translate the Shlokas from Vedas and also will be able to track Sanskrit words which are being used in Different Languages around the world.. Proud of such youths like him🔥🔥🔥🔥
I think it is a wrong interpretation, Rama + bhyas (राम + भ्यस्) = ramebhyah (रामेभ्यः) There are two different possibilities 1. Supi cha (सुपि च) & 2 bahuvachane jhalyet (बहुवचने झल्येत्) . How it's solved by your interpretation... ?? Because you have interpreted the Para (पर) word as right side. ( 2.40 )
Correct, and the place where he is showing fault रामैः or मन्त्रैः, there it is a case of अपवादः as it is said that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः, even बहुवचने झल्येत् is परशास्त्रम्, because अतो भिस ऐस् is apavaada, it will apply
@@viveksakhi9074 Kindly read his thesis available on DOI: 10.17863/CAM.80099. He has proved that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule need not be used for astadhyayi and विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् is sifficient to solve all problems. Astadhyayi is self sufficient and can solve all conflicts of rules on its own. By his method you can get रामैः or मन्त्रैः without using परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule. If you find any fault in his thesis then you can challenge him and write correct version.
First of all Heartiest Congrtulations for achievements. One question - The books you referred for the study were available in Cambridge or you got them from India?
This guy is pretty cool. All kudos to him. It says a lot about humanity that only he was willing to think differently about the problem. This is why diversity is important. And I mean diversity of opinion and experience. It’s great to be a part of the human experience with him. So much knowledge to learn.
Congratulations brother & I hope this brings the needed attention to the grandeur & greatness to the Sanskrit language that it so badly deserves. Even with such richness it has been vilified & demonized & has been accused of corrupting local Indian languages & the colonial rule also did it best to rest it in oblivion & ironically it's in their own backyard that a breakthrough has been achieved in it which makes it really special.
किसी भी शिष्य की योग्यता उसके गुरु के आधार पर मानी जाती है और हम सभी के आराध्य त्रि मुनि जिन्हे ये ऋषिकुमार गलत ठहरा रहा है और वो लोग क्या सहमति जता रहे है जिन्हे खुद एक अक्षर नही मालूम।
#आपके_विचारों_का_स्वागत_है.... #कैम्ब्रिज_विश्वविद्यालय के शोधछात्र के विचारों को ध्यान पूर्वक सुनने के बाद शोध की प्रामाणिकता के सन्दर्भ में निराशा हुई। विश्वविद्यालय ने अपने यूट्यूब चैनल पर शोधार्थी के जिस वीडियो को साझा किया है उसकी भाषा श्लाघनीय नहीं है। जिस प्रकार से शोधार्थी ने महामुनि पाणिनि की प्रज्ञा को सर्वोच्च बताते हुए कात्यायन एवं पतञ्जलि को हीन सिद्ध किया है वह न केवल अग्राह्य है अपितु निन्दनीय भी है। कैम्ब्रिज जैसे प्रतिष्ठित विश्वविद्यालय के शोधकर्ता से ऐसी गर्वित वाणी की अपेक्षा नहीं थी। जिस गुत्थी को सुलझाने का दावा शोधार्थी ने किया है वस्तुत: संस्कृत व्याकरण में ऐसी कोई गुत्थी है ही नहीं। यह शोधार्थी की स्वयमुपजनित और स्वयं समाहित गुत्थी है। जिस पाणिनीय सूत्र *विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम्* (अष्टाध्यायी 1/4/2) पर शोधार्थी ने गुत्थी को सुलझाने का कार्य किया वह व्याकरण परम्परा में सुस्पष्ट है। पाणिनि की अष्टाध्यायी के चार हजार सूत्रों में इतना अद्भुत सामर्थ्य है कि संस्कृत के अरबों शब्दों को एक मात्रा की भी त्रुटि के बिना यथावत् सिद्ध किया जा सकता है। परन्तु पाणिनि की पूर्णता वार्त्तिककार कात्यायन एवं महामुनि पतंजलि के बिना अधूरी है। 2500 वर्षों की स्थापित अत्यन्त प्रामाणिक एवं प्रतिपद् विचारित परम्परा को निरस्त करने का दावा अप्रशस्त है। यह भी दु:खद है कि भारतीय हिंदी / अंग्रेजी समाचार पत्रों ने मानसिक दासता की वृत्ति के कारण शोध जैसे गहन विषय को सतही रूप में प्रकाशित किया। पाणिनीय अष्टाध्यायी पर गत 2500 वर्षों में असंख्य बुद्धिजीवियों ने कार्य किया है, नये विचार भी आते ही रहे हैं। प्रकृत शोधार्थी का नया दृष्टिकोण भी स्वागत योग्य हो सकता है। पर एक साधारण से अभिनव विचार के आधार पर महामुनि कात्यायन एवं महाभाष्य कार पतंजलि तथा तदनुगामी सुदीर्घ परम्परा पर प्रश्नचिन्ह लगाना तर्कसंगत नहीं है। मैंने शोधकर्ता के शोधप्रबन्ध (थीसिस) को अभी विहंगम दृष्टि से ही पढने का प्रयास किया है इसलिए उस पर कोई टिप्पणी करना उचित नहीं होगा। अच्छा लगा कि उसमें कुरुक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय के पूर्व आचार्य डॉ कपिल देव शास्त्री एवं प्रो. बलराम शुक्ल (दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय) को उद्धृत किया गया है। इस शोध पर भारतीय विश्वविद्यालयों के संस्कृत व्याकरण के सम्मानित आचार्यों तथा पारम्परिक व्याकरण के मनीषियों के विचार आमन्त्रित किए जाने चाहिए।
परं का अर्थ जब बाद में होता है तो उसका अर्थ दक्षिण कैसे लिया जाएगा। जो चीज यंत्रबुद्धि् को स्वीकार्य होगी उसके अनुरूप व्याकरण के नियमों की व्याख्या थोड़े न की जाएगी। शोधार्थी का वक्तव्य दंभ से भरा है। तुक्का लग गया उसी से यह लोग फूले नहीं समा रहे।
Congratulations on your achievement !!! It's a matter of pride for all of us wish this will inspire many to learn Sanskrit and remember our ancestors the great work they had done. 🙏🙏🙏🌸🌼🏵️❤️❤️❤️
Congratulations.. Don’t underestimate the wisdom of the great Maharshis and ancestors… While your work may be appreciated but it should stand the test of time .
@@devotion240 Sanskrit generally connotes several Old Indo-Aryan language varieties. The most archaic of these is the Vedic Sanskrit found in the Rig Veda, a collection of 1,028 hymns composed between 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE by Indo-Aryan tribes migrating east from what are today Afghanistan across northern Pakistan and into northwestern India. Vedic Sanskrit interacted with the preexisting ancient languages of the subcontinent, absorbing names of newly encountered plants and animals; in addition, the ancient Dravidian languages influenced Sanskrit's phonology and syntax. Sanskrit can also more narrowly refer to Classical Sanskrit, a refined and standardized grammatical form that emerged in the mid-1st millennium BCE and was codified in the most comprehensive of ancient grammars, the Aṣṭādhyāyī ('Eight chapters') of Pāṇini. The greatest dramatist in Sanskrit, Kālidāsa, wrote in classical Sanskrit, and the foundations of modern arithmetic were first described in classical Sanskrit. The two major Sanskrit epics, the Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyaṇa, however, were composed in a range of oral storytelling registers called Epic Sanskrit which was used in northern India between 400 BCE and 300 CE, and roughly contemporary with classical Sanskrit. In the following centuries, Sanskrit became tradition-bound, stopped being learned as a first language, and ultimately stopped developing as a living language. Try📚researching before🗣replying? 🇨🇦✌🏻📜♥️(+🇺🇦)✨🌎💫
@@rinalore The Native sanskrit speakers brahmins are just as nomadic in the past as the modern roma gypsies. As bramins were nomads and therefore the influence of the other dialect(European, Russian and Asian) on sanskrit. Sanskrit is a mixture of many dialect and it has developed words from other language and dialect to make itself better. Some religions originated in the indian subcontinent and were professionally marketed(practiced) by the sanskrit speaking brahmins. Once native sanskrit speakers brahmins are nomads and later brahmins are preachers they declared their mixed dialect divine and culture as vedic. Sanskrit spread religiously rather than as a better dialect. There are 300 variants of Ramayana in the world most of which are in written form except Valmiki Ramayana. Ramayana and Mahabharata have spread orally in many cultures and so has the Sanskrit Valmiki Ramayana, so there is nothing to emphasize.
@@rinalore These dates of 1500 BC etc. are all hogwash ... no scientific basis. These dates were decided by colonial historians of 19th century based on Biblical belief that the world was made in 4000 BC so anything cannot be older than that.
Congratulations brother!! You did a great job !! 👏👏👏👏 India is proud of u ...and i am feeling very very proud of my culture and ancient geniuses...👏👏👏👏👏
There are too many irregularities and contradictions in this work. The puzzle has not been solved. The only bit that is clear is how eager they are to declare that there has been a breakthrough, without thorough research, debate and validation .
The difficulty of Sanskrit grammar has been removed today, but with the help of which script, can anyone tell this, and 2500 years ago which script was used to write Sanskrit🤔
Congratulations! I feel great that an Indian has cracked the code. May your work continue to make India proud of its great past.
@Satish Gupta What is your problem? That he did his PhD in Cambridge? He got into the University through his own steam. Not through reservation, I am sure. He used his own intelligence to decipher a code of over 2500 years. He did not use British intelligence. Where is British supremacy here? Rather he would have received a token or generous stipend from the University which he would not have here. Isn't he still Indian? Don't you feel proud for a compatriot's achievement? What is your problem?
@satishgupta2658 6∆dwe angrezi bolna sikh pehle baad me angrezo ki ¢hatna.... 😂🤣
@Satish Gupta Are you British?
Stupid people don’t understand that the finding will written in the name of Cambridge. There is no proud in india.
Your future generations will be laughed at by saying that we had the treasures but we did not find it. This is a academic war which is lost by India.
Lol do you expect a non indian to crack the code? lol. Indians themselves don't understand sanskrit and you expect non-indians to understand the sanskrit grammar problem and also solve it lol
I am a Sanskrit student in delhi university sir you have given me a lot of inspiration to do more in field in Sanskrit.
Hi, I am from the Philippines! I want to ask a question.
For years now I want to understand the relationship between Sanskrit to the Laguna copperplate inscription. We learn how Hinduism comes from the Philippines, we even have more than 100+ borrowed words from Sanskrit that we still use to this day. As a Sanskrit student, I want to know from your perspective the historicity of the Baybayin alphabet because we never learn in school how the Sanskrit language made a huge contribution to how our current language Tagalog formed. Thank you for your answer! I am a linguistic enthusiast from the Philippines. Nice to meet you!
.
Ha
@@ayeshamoritano1031 go ahead 👍
@@ayeshamoritano1031 wow very interesting, all the best
This achievement is a matter of great pride for us Paniniya grammarians.
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 They are highly helpful in speech generation related stuff like the ones in google assistant or alexa
@@guruteja7151 that’s so cool! Exciting times
@@moneymaker3456 Currently, English is the intermediate language in every translation. If Sanskrit becomes the intermediate language, then it will be beneficial.
@@moneymaker3456 im computer engineer and ML student rn. Read in depth how sankrit can be taught to machine in better way...
"I took break, cooked, swimmed, meditated and did not even touch books for a month". Mate, I have been applying your research technique for many years but still no resul 😃 Good job btw👍
😂
Keep working on it maybe after some years you will achieve something 😂
kabhi kabi stressful mind jo chees solve nehi karti relax mind solve kar deti hai its beauty of brain
🤣🤣🤣
He did mention that he had spent a lot of time and burned the midnight oil in the library on trying to solve the problem before taking the break. Both, hard work and relaxation are required to be successful - one cannot just go with too much of one and expect positive results!
I would first request you to make a video on what the algorithm is and how the traditional interpretation did not fit in and how your interpretation corrected it.
आवश्यक है
Read the article. It discusses the traditional interpretation and it has his own interpretation.
Read his PhD thesis, it’s available online.
It is an eye opener. He had incisive thinking and thought outside the box to come up with this interpretation. Because we were taught the same thing by our teachers and we accepted it without questioning.
then read his reasearch dumbo
This is a proud moment for Bharatiya and all the Hindus in the world, I congratulate Rishi Rajpopat.
,
............sad.......... no university in the SubContinent47 invited him to do a PhD...
.
@@ricardoafonso7563 because of the $hit called secularism.
.
Perhaps Panini was a NirIshwarwadi...
.
@@ricardoafonso7563 Hinduism even has a place for Nirishvarvaad and atheism. Ajivika, Charvaka, Buddhism and Jainism are the nastika schools of Sanatana thought.
.
Thank you
.
I agree
.
There are so many wonderful philosophy to be understood and enjoyed
.
भवत: शोधमिदं सर्वथा असत्यम्।
विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् (१.४.२) विप्रतिषेधशब्दस्य लोके विरोधवाचित्वेन प्रसिद्धत्वात् विप्रतिषेधशब्देन तुल्यबलविरोधोऽत्र गृह्यते। अन्यत्रान्यत्र लब्धावकाशयोरेकत्र युगपत्प्राप्तिस्तुल्यबलविरोध:। तुल्यबलविरोधे सति परं कार्यं भवति।
वृक्षेभ्य: , प्लक्षेभ्य:। अत्र 'वृक्ष भ्यस्' ' प्लक्ष भ्यस् ' इत्यवस्थायां सुपि च ( ७.३.१०२) इत्यतेन सूत्रेण दीर्ध: प्राप्त:। बहुवचने झल्येत् (७.३.१०३) इत्यनेन सुत्रेण 'एत्वम्' च प्राप्तम् । विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् (१.४.२) इति सूत्रसाहाय्येन परत्वादेत्वमेव भवति। यत: वृक्षाभ्याम् , इत्यत्र 'वृक्ष भ्याम् ' इत्यवस्थायां 'सुपि च' (७.३.१०२) इति सूत्रं चरितार्थम् । 'वृक्षेषु ' अत्र 'वृक्ष सुप् ' इत्यवस्थायां ' बहुवचने झल्येत् (७.३.१०३) इति सूत्रं चरितार्थम् | वृक्षेभ्य: इत्युभयत्र प्राप्नोति । विप्रतषेधेन परत्वादेत्वं भवति।
please make video on tgis comment and discribe your view.. it will better presented.. even if you explain it in hindi or other mother tongue
Yes.this is the exact explanation for vipratishete param karyam.
विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम्
जब 'सपादसप्ताध्यायी ' के ऐसे दो सूत्र एक साथ एक ही स्थल पर कार्य करने के लिए उपस्थित हों , जिन्हें यदि हम एक जगह कार्य न करने दें , तो भी वे अन्यत्र कार्य कर सकें, इसे प्रतिषेध या तुल्य विरोध कहते हैं।और आप इसी सूत्र को गलत करने की चेष्टा कर रहे हैं। सर्वथा निन्दनीय है I
My introduction to Sanskrit has been from ISKON books by Swami Prabhupada thanks for mantra knowledge Hare Krishna
Panini's grammar (among other grammars of Sanskrit) is undoubtedly the most stunning example of structured (algorithmic) thinking and possibly the highest single human intellectual achievement of antiquity. It is delightful that this puzzle be solved by a student from a university that produced in the past the likes of Thomas Macaulay who had the wisdom to contend that "a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia." Cheers.
Doesn't the macaulay quote downplaying indias literature?
@@axed1176 I think that's the point.
Pānīni is a pen name of a group of writers.
@@axed1176 that is why the commentator used the sentence "delightful to have student from the same university" as this student's discovery somehow contradicts Thomas's sayings
"gall" would be a better word, instead of "wisdom"
Fantastic!!! Congratulations from Brazil. You are very intelligent and smart as Panini. 👍👍👍
The way he described how he got to the solution out of blue after taking some break and keeping his mind away from the problem in the meantime is just so relatable to me. When we get heavily involved in our studies, brain doesn't get the chance to establish links right away between tidbits of information until we give it some time to do so. Then you start to view everything more clearly in the bigger picture
Einstein had the same experience during his life. 😊 He went away in a summer vacation and when came back made a big discovery out of the blue in a few days. 👍😀
आचार्य परंपरा का खंडन। ऐसे कैसे आप कोई भी बात को सिद्ध मान लेते है। प्रमाण चाहिए आचार्यों को खंडन करने के लिए भी प्रमाण चाहिए किसी भी मूर्ख के कहने पर आप आचार्य परंपरा को बदल देंगे विदेशी क्या किसी को प्रमाण देंगे अथवा क्या किसी को रिजल्ट देंगे कि कौन सही है कौन गलत है जिनको हिंदी भी नहीं आती राम+सु से राम क्या बनाना आ गया तो आप अपने आप को पानि नीय न समझ रहे हैं ऐसे पाणिनी हमारे हमारे भारतवर्ष में प्रत्येक गगुरुकुलो में हजारों भरे पड़े हैं
अभिनन्दनम् ऋषिः भवतः। अस्माकं नैतिकतां वर्धयितुं धन्यवादः । (Congratulation Rishi. Thanks for boosting our morals)
Heartily Congratulations on solving puzzle which puzzled many for centuries. 💐💐
India is truly Land of Intellectuals.
Wow, Panini was a genius! Well done
Спасибо Вам за Ваш вклад в создание этого открытия.
खरे आहे. एक महत्वाचे म्हणजे
I kept all my books away for more than a month.
नंतर फक्त चिंतन केले तर मार्ग सापडतो.
भाष्यकारांंते वाट पुसतु हे माउलिंचे बरोबरच आहे. पण अनेकदा फक्त अशाच पद्धतिने राहिले तर मुळे विचाराना नेमस्तपणा येतो. नविन सापडत नाही.
म्हणून अभ्यासाच्या ठराविक पातळीनंतर कधितरि जुने जाऊ द्या मरणालागुनि .....असे केले तरच केशवसुतांना सापडली तशी नवि तुतारी सापडते.
आइन्स्टिननेही कधि असे म्हटलेचः मी (ठराविक पठडीत) शिकलो नाहि हे जास्त चांगले झाले।
Interestingly this is a similar issue that we see in the famous pacha-dhaatu..
there are other rules which say the successor and predecessor concept like we have in numbers...
There are teachers who did figure this out but sadly no one bothered to document and no one dared to ask...
Thank you, for formulating and adding here and spreading and publishing your knowledge...
If we all were speaking Sanskrit the Natural Language Processing technology would have been way more advanced...
I am happy and proud of you sir.
What's logic behind 2500 timeline.. just estimate? It must be far more ancient
@@ExhaleYogaSchool you are righ. panini has compiled the grammar just like vyasa compiled vedas.
For example vyasa and valmiki have done a large deal of literature way before panini.
This timeline is because, there are scholars who propagated false info stating sanskrit is not older than Buddha. So this is a misinterpratation like Aryan theory..
@@ExhaleYogaSchool The clasical Panini Sanskrit was 2500 yrs only but before there was Vedic Sanskrit which was not leaden with grammatical rules
@@ExhaleYogaSchool Sanskrit and TamiI are the oldest recorded languages.
He didn't have limited tools. He had the greatest tool, the human mind.
+1
Well said!
I just have gone through an "analysis of his paper" by another scholar based in India. Since this is related to Sanskrit, it seems that there are many wrong assumptions by Rishi.
@@tarunbanala7633 i think those will get solved by time to time.
@@1R2U1S2H4 nothing is there to be solved everything is clear in grammar
Please make a little somewhat detailed version of this video too, came here after an article in Hindustan Times to see what the puzzle is.
Actually there is no such unsolved problem in the vyakarana sastra.The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
आपका यह तर्क सर्वथा अप्रशंसनीय एवं असत्य है।
आप में तर्क करने का सामर्थ्य है ही नहीं कुतर्क कर रहे हैं ।
this is really awesome and the feeling that people were wrong about something for 2500 years, and now you discovered truth, so many possibilities opened
I would like to point out that there was no "puzzle" per se in the first place. All the solutions/ interpretations given by katyayana and patanjali fit perfectly for all the sutras and derivations of ashtadhyayi.
Now, you should've at least stated that it is an alternate method confined in its application as you've left out "aagamaas" conveniently as your alternate method doesn't work for them. The alternate idea that you've given in your thesis doesn't work properly even within the area that you've claimed, for eg at रामेभ्यः । There are many other instances where your theory doesn't work. Then how is it that you're making such big claims!
Now coming to its applicability in the computer world, it would produce incorrect results as the alternate solution is limited and doesn't apply 100% in the claimed domain either.
While your interest in sanskrit and the hard work is worth appreciation it is completely inappropriate to denounce the rishis without coming up with a wholesome idea yourself.
He hasn’t published his thesis yet. It would be good to go through it in detail and then critique it. Until then it wouldn’t hurt us to commend the effort and the very initiative of trying to explore the topic on the face-value of it.
@@GOODMEALTASTESGOOD He is right. Watch "देववाणी संस्कृतम् devvani sanskritam" youtube channel's video about the same to get more clarity.
@@GOODMEALTASTESGOOD yeah and not reviewed by scholar's
chill bro don't get jealous
@@DashingChannel people are not jealous here. They just care enough.
a proud moment for India with a sad undertone that this was not done at an Indian university
Many congratulations to Dr. Rishi Rajpopat. His work has brought great pride to us Indians. May he comtinue these wonderful discoveries even after his PhD.
Aur bhai kaise ho aajkal.....
Isro me bhi apna sanskrit ka passion jinda rakkhe ho ye jankar acha laga
Not Indians. Indo Aryan speakers. Dravidians and Tibeto-Burman speakers exists in India too.
@@eshaansarkar2017 So? Aren't indo-aryan speakers Indian? I am also a Tamil and it is a moment of great pride for us. Stop this racial nonsense!!
@@eshaansarkar2017 shut up. Dravidian speakers are also Indians!
@@eshaansarkar2017 What a dumass.
Finally - academic rigor instead of rhetoric is brought to the study of the ancient language. To be able to codify a language in 4000 rules shows the genius of Panini. And it took Dr.Rajpopat several years of hard work to put everything in place. A PhD from the University of Cambridge is no easy task - the thesis would be scrutinized, challenged and taken to pieces by the academicia before the PhD is granted. So congratulations to Dr.Rajpopat (understated). Unfortunately, we might have a lot of jealous folks trying to poke holes without even reading his paper...
This is just all noise. See Neelesh Bodas' fully academic teardown, a summary of which is available on RUclips.
🙏Before pointing finger at great Karthyaayana,kindly introspect yourselves,interact with present great scholars in our country , like Dr.K Vishnu Namboothiri etc and
understand where you do stand 🙏
ओम। क्या आप बहुलम चंदसी,पूर्वत्र सिद्धम सूत्रों को नही जानते!? पूर्वपरणित्यन्तरङ्गापवदानां उत्तरोत्तरं बलीय ... यह एक परिभाषा है।इस के अनुसार एक स्थान मे दो से ज्यादा सूत्र आयेंगे तो उन में कौनसा सूत्र बलवान होता है बताया गया। बहुवचन झल्येत सूत्र का अपवाद अतो भिस ऐस् है।इसलिए यहा भिस की स्थान में ऐस आदेश होके मन्त्रैः बन गया।वेद मन्त्रो मे दिखने वाले शभरूप मन्त्रेभि:,कर्णेभिः ....के सिद्धि बहुलं छन्दसि से कर सकते है।
Great discovery! More importantly love your enthusiasm and clear communication style.
All the Shastra and ancient Indian knowledge needs a deep research and I'm pretty sure that it will gonna blow everyone's mind if we could understand all these ancient knowledge, Rishi hatts off to you for such amazing work you literally inspire many youths and other scholars too.
Congratulations to Dr. Rishi
This is such a big achievement and that too in such a simple way! impressive!! Your knowledge of the root language and logical interpretation have greatly helped.
This is wonderful. Congratulations & thank you to make us feel proud of our history
Every single Sanskrit word been understood and accounted for as taught by Sage Panini. Only thing is those who study Ashtadhyaayi, though small in numbers, don't come out and beat their chest. This discovery is just a tall claim about a topic which people at large of unaware of. Just because one is from Cambridge doesn't mean he is great and others are fools.
You are right.
We should appreciate any achievement from our culture
@@akshaysharma8940 sure. But try and study Ashtadhyaayi atleast a bit and then you'll understand the truth of this half baked discovery. If anyone to be celebrated in this context, its Sage Panini and later Acharyas like Patanjali who wrote Mahabhashya on Ashtadhyaayi and other Acharyas who built upon Ashtadhyaayi. All of them were unimaginable intellectual giants. One will understand this only when you study atleast a bit. Then you'll see how hollow is this half baked reasearch claim is and how silly is the celebration around it. Start studying now instead of basking on validation from a white man. Free yourself from intellectual slavery.
@@out.thiri007 got it👍🏻
This is an occasion to celebrate an achievement of a young Indian scientist in the contemporary academic arena, not to compare with quiet scholars who kept things to themselves or who never bothered to solve it in open through any of the Indian universities. Expected a little more large heartedness.
Panini was never wrong, it is just that, he was misinterpreted maybe due to one faulty explanation by Katyayana, and later people never raised fingers on it. Thanks for the renewed interpretation. Please share the Thesis PDF! And may I know, what was the explanation of Patanjali on this.
have you read mahabhashya and asthadhyayi bhashya?
@@DJAlone I am sure, Patanjali must have done the Justice.
@@rudhisundar i have महाभाष्य with me but i can't post pictures of it here. but believe me there's nothing wrong in it as claimed by rajpopat
The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view. Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
I can atleast say we are not deprived. Now here
You've inspired me more now for research
Its mind boggling that our ancient indians created systems for language models...
Fascinating! Congratulations! Thanks for sharing.
We think we are technologically advanced but with this and also ancient architecture such a indian temples they were even ahead of us.
Great work Rishi. Recognition is due to Cambridge University as well for patronizing such a fundamental research.
आपको बहुत-बहुत बधाई यह अद्भुत खोज करने के लिए!🙏
This is fabulous ❤
Indian Rishis are always Fabulous.. 😇😇😇
Kudos! It's is even heartening to know that an Indian has cracked this puzzle. Indian universities should be on the forefront in this kind of research
@WORKOHOLIC SN Lmao
While I don't understand Sanskrit and the magnitude of your find, I am quite certain that you have etched your name in the history. Congratulations!
Congratulations to you Rishi and you gurus to guides for this discovery
अंग्रेजी में बोलने से कोई शास्त्र का जानकार नहीं हो जाता ऋषि कुमार जी कभी आइए और बैठिए विद्वानों के मध्य में फिर स्पष्ट होगा की आप ने क्या खोज करली ।
Areee moorkha wo sanskrit grammar ke baare me baat kr raha hai .. rule contradiction hota hai uspe Inka clarification hai
"If your solution is too complex you're probably wrong." 😂🥰
Fortunately , this doesnt apply to maths.
Arcam's razor
This is really historical that someone solved 2500 year old puzzle now
Sanskrit is called as the language of Devta i.e.devine language. This breakthrough should be fruitfully utilised in computer language and be beneficially utilised.
@@rameshverma4461 literally you need to improve your history
@@spices9813 The history of Sanskrit that is being told is not a history but a scam
@@rameshverma4461 Then what is the history of Sanskrit, I am curious?
@@rameshverma4461😂😂😂😂 which is the oldest manuscript in Pali
@@rameshverma4461 had u done Graduation from WhatsApp University ?
Hello sir I am from India. After watching your video I feel how our ancient Indian mathematician guru are very genius.
यह कोई उपलब्धि नहीं है बल्कि आचार्य परंपरा का खण्डन है ।
Haha 😅... Koop mandook..
Do you understood what he says...
Sounds great. Congrats!!
Fascinating..
We need a long talk on this topic.. please Cambridge
नमस्कार आपके द्वारा दी गई जानकारी बहुत महत्वपूर्ण है। ख़ुशी हुई आपको सुनकर कि आप विदेश में रह कर भी भारतीय संस्कृति को आगे बढ़ाने का कार्य कर रहे हैं। क्या आप कैंब्रिज में मेरे लिए ऐसी जानकारी से सम्बन्ध रखती कोई किताब खोज सकते हैं जिसमे भारतीय गुण सूत्र व्यवस्था (Genetics marriages) के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया हो? कोशिश कीजिएगा अगर मिल जाये तो।
भारत के प्राचीन इतिहास में Genetics improvement बहुत काम हुआ है।
amazing!! this is a boost for sanskrit powered AI and NLP.
Please tell me what are it's applications in the computer world. How can teaching a computer 4,000 of panini's rules of Sanskrit language is beneficial
@@moneymaker3456 From what I understand, they want to build AI which can think clearly
and sanskrutam is the perfect language because it never has double meaning of a particular sentence.. like english or any other language
@@moneymaker3456 sanskrit language and paninian grammatical structures are special in the fact that every word carries the contextual meta-data along with it. So there no ambiguity when extracting meaning.
In English: we have two sentences "I am going to Bombay" and "I am going to eat". Only the last word changes, and changes entire context as bombay is a place while eat is an action. But in sanskrit every word carries in it, its tense, person, quantity, case, etc. So even if the word positions are changed in a sentence, the meaning doesnt change. What AI/ML NLP programs try to do, is to build context meta-data over other natural languages like english which lack such inbuild mechanism, and then further learn the rules to extract meaning.
@@cyb-m thank you for breaking it down 🙏🏼
@@cyb-m ignore the librandus.. they jst have hate for our country and our dharma
Congratulations 🍾 This is exciting news! I understand the need for a break as a means to reset and attain clarity! Way to go, happy for you and this discovery!
Poor Panini has gone misunderstood for 2500 years....
He must be thinking "Arre yaar, why did I not make it crystal clear when I wrote my rulebook..."
Until Dr. Rajpopat arrives on the scene and takes a one month holiday.
Interesting how even Katyayana, who came after Panini, seems to have fallen for this misunderstanding.
So the two probably never met. Or maybe Katyayana's mistake spilled on to everyone who followed?
😅😅😅
Poor is the language you use and the culture you follow .. Panini is still and in coming 1000years will be 'revered'
@@robin4singh Poor is the only language that was gifted by the pure blood white European Christian barberics.
@@robin4singh wtf
@sudo2998 Panini Rishi was much more rich then you or any 21st century person in terms of Knowledge. And may be Katyayana intentionally misinterpret ate so that poor generations like us who don't know how to respect gurus and senior scholars should be misguided from the real knowledge of Panini Rishi. Because modern education only teaches how to exploit!!
Excellent commendable work Dr Rishi. You are a true RISHI from India
Can you please make a more detailed video with a simplified explanation of what the problem was, what you have achieved, and also one more thing. You said your solution solves the problem without exception. So, does that mean if you apply the older version, you come up with errors? a slightly detailed comparison will be great.
He is a pawn in the hands of Cambridge guys who are trying to hack Bharat and it’s essence.
The शब्दपरविप्रतिषेधपक्ष is not a new discovery. It already exists in the traditional view.
It's the meaning of this paribhasa sutra as applied in the case of conflict of two vidhi sutras, Katyayana's interpretation that 'para' meaning the vidhi sutra number which is later in the serial order is chosen, this interpretation is found to be producing gaurava not laghava.
@@dhiren26 Not only as a purvapaksha by Katyayana but it partially accepted by Patanjali also. Later Kaiyata,Nagesa all discussed this in bhashya. You can read it in the bhashya of 'acah parasmin purvavidhau'. If we accept this new researcher's interpretation it will be difficult to derive many words like द्यौः, पन्थाः etc
.
We studied Sanskrit .. Class 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... old Cambridge Schools in India .. until 1976
.......perhaps stopped being taught after that
.......glad Cambridge University continues the subject
.
ऋषि ने कोई नया कार्य नहीं किया है विप्रतिषेधे परम् कार्यम् सूत्र का सही प्रयोग पाणिनि अष्टाध्यायी में है 🙏कृपया दुष्प्रचार न करें
Now when we can know the Root word by this Sutra.. i hope we will be able to accurately translate the Shlokas from Vedas and also will be able to track Sanskrit words which are being used in Different Languages around the world.. Proud of such youths like him🔥🔥🔥🔥
@divyanshkherde172 have you ever read a single Ved? Dubass
I think it is a wrong interpretation,
Rama + bhyas (राम + भ्यस्) = ramebhyah (रामेभ्यः)
There are two different possibilities 1. Supi cha (सुपि च) & 2 bahuvachane jhalyet (बहुवचने झल्येत्) . How it's solved by your interpretation... ??
Because you have interpreted the Para (पर) word as right side. ( 2.40 )
Correct, and the place where he is showing fault रामैः or मन्त्रैः, there it is a case of अपवादः as it is said that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः, even बहुवचने झल्येत् is परशास्त्रम्, because अतो भिस ऐस् is apavaada, it will apply
@@viveksakhi9074 Kindly read his thesis available on DOI: 10.17863/CAM.80099. He has proved that परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule need not be used for astadhyayi and विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम् is sifficient to solve all problems. Astadhyayi is self sufficient and can solve all conflicts of rules on its own. By his method you can get रामैः or मन्त्रैः without using परनित्यान्तरङ्गापवादानामुत्तरोत्तरं बलीयः rule. If you find any fault in his thesis then you can challenge him and write correct version.
congratulations Rishi. This a great achievement for us and for intelligence thank you for making india proud Rishi
First of all Heartiest Congrtulations for achievements. One question - The books you referred for the study were available in Cambridge or you got them from India?
Abhinandanam(congratulations)
Absolutely fascinating and very inspiring! Thanks 🙏
fun fact: Drones in movie Interstellar were running on Sanskrit OS language
Fun fact : it's in movie. Plus your gods only exist in books
@@y1.5 Haha probably all Gods
@@y1.5get a life. hate begets hate. Your comment speaks more about you than Gods. Poor little hater
Indian mothers...pushing their children to greatness everyday...
Now I'm reading this for upsc 😅
This guy is pretty cool. All kudos to him. It says a lot about humanity that only he was willing to think differently about the problem. This is why diversity is important. And I mean diversity of opinion and experience. It’s great to be a part of the human experience with him. So much knowledge to learn.
Really great work and lucid explanation
This discovery can revolutionize machine learning. I hope that you will write Sanskrit teaching textbooks.
Congratulations !!!! Great Job : 👏
Congratulations brother & I hope this brings the needed attention to the grandeur & greatness to the Sanskrit language that it so badly deserves. Even with such richness it has been vilified & demonized & has been accused of corrupting local Indian languages & the colonial rule also did it best to rest it in oblivion & ironically it's in their own backyard that a breakthrough has been achieved in it which makes it really special.
Congrats for your efforts. You truly inspired us with your phenomenal and exceptional work.
WOW !!!!!WHAT A POSITIVITY THIS IS....SIR UH R AWESOME....UR SMILE IS INVINCIBLE.
किसी भी शिष्य की योग्यता उसके गुरु के आधार पर मानी जाती है और हम सभी के आराध्य त्रि मुनि जिन्हे ये ऋषिकुमार गलत ठहरा रहा है और वो लोग क्या सहमति जता रहे है जिन्हे खुद एक अक्षर नही मालूम।
Why can't we have world class universities in India ?? Shame on us !
Amazing. Will this new discovery give a new meaning to many a wrong interpretation of ancient Indian books ?
#आपके_विचारों_का_स्वागत_है....
#कैम्ब्रिज_विश्वविद्यालय के शोधछात्र के विचारों को ध्यान पूर्वक सुनने के बाद शोध की प्रामाणिकता के सन्दर्भ में निराशा हुई। विश्वविद्यालय ने अपने यूट्यूब चैनल पर शोधार्थी के जिस वीडियो को साझा किया है उसकी भाषा श्लाघनीय नहीं है। जिस प्रकार से शोधार्थी ने महामुनि पाणिनि की प्रज्ञा को सर्वोच्च बताते हुए कात्यायन एवं पतञ्जलि को हीन सिद्ध किया है वह न केवल अग्राह्य है अपितु निन्दनीय भी है। कैम्ब्रिज जैसे प्रतिष्ठित विश्वविद्यालय के शोधकर्ता से ऐसी गर्वित वाणी की अपेक्षा नहीं थी। जिस गुत्थी को सुलझाने का दावा शोधार्थी ने किया है वस्तुत: संस्कृत व्याकरण में ऐसी कोई गुत्थी है ही नहीं। यह शोधार्थी की स्वयमुपजनित और स्वयं समाहित गुत्थी है। जिस पाणिनीय सूत्र *विप्रतिषेधे परं कार्यम्* (अष्टाध्यायी 1/4/2) पर शोधार्थी ने गुत्थी को सुलझाने का कार्य किया वह व्याकरण परम्परा में सुस्पष्ट है। पाणिनि की अष्टाध्यायी के चार हजार सूत्रों में इतना अद्भुत सामर्थ्य है कि संस्कृत के अरबों शब्दों को एक मात्रा की भी त्रुटि के बिना यथावत् सिद्ध किया जा सकता है। परन्तु पाणिनि की पूर्णता वार्त्तिककार कात्यायन एवं महामुनि पतंजलि के बिना अधूरी है। 2500 वर्षों की स्थापित अत्यन्त प्रामाणिक एवं प्रतिपद् विचारित परम्परा को निरस्त करने का दावा अप्रशस्त है। यह भी दु:खद है कि भारतीय हिंदी / अंग्रेजी समाचार पत्रों ने मानसिक दासता की वृत्ति के कारण शोध जैसे गहन विषय को सतही रूप में प्रकाशित किया। पाणिनीय अष्टाध्यायी पर गत 2500 वर्षों में असंख्य बुद्धिजीवियों ने कार्य किया है, नये विचार भी आते ही रहे हैं। प्रकृत शोधार्थी का नया दृष्टिकोण भी स्वागत योग्य हो सकता है। पर एक साधारण से अभिनव विचार के आधार पर महामुनि कात्यायन एवं महाभाष्य कार पतंजलि तथा तदनुगामी सुदीर्घ परम्परा पर प्रश्नचिन्ह लगाना तर्कसंगत नहीं है। मैंने शोधकर्ता के शोधप्रबन्ध (थीसिस) को अभी विहंगम दृष्टि से ही पढने का प्रयास किया है इसलिए उस पर कोई टिप्पणी करना उचित नहीं होगा। अच्छा लगा कि उसमें कुरुक्षेत्र विश्वविद्यालय के पूर्व आचार्य डॉ कपिल देव शास्त्री एवं प्रो. बलराम शुक्ल (दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय) को उद्धृत किया गया है। इस शोध पर भारतीय विश्वविद्यालयों के संस्कृत व्याकरण के सम्मानित आचार्यों तथा पारम्परिक व्याकरण के मनीषियों के विचार आमन्त्रित किए जाने चाहिए।
परं का अर्थ जब बाद में होता है तो उसका अर्थ दक्षिण कैसे लिया जाएगा। जो चीज यंत्रबुद्धि् को स्वीकार्य होगी उसके अनुरूप व्याकरण के नियमों की व्याख्या थोड़े न की जाएगी। शोधार्थी का वक्तव्य दंभ से भरा है। तुक्का लग गया उसी से यह लोग फूले नहीं समा रहे।
Britishers mind can't think beyond 2500 years back but our history start more than 1 billion yrs ago 😂😂
Wow - this is amazing. Many congratulations
Amazing ❤ god bless you
Adbhut Bharat.... Adbhut Rushi....!!!
Congratulations on your achievement !!! It's a matter of pride for all of us wish this will inspire many to learn Sanskrit and remember our ancestors the great work they had done.
🙏🙏🙏🌸🌼🏵️❤️❤️❤️
Congratulations.. Don’t underestimate the wisdom of the great Maharshis and ancestors… While your work may be appreciated but it should stand the test of time .
Mes félicitations! J’ai l’impression qu’un nouveau « Champollion » s’est présenté. Quelle découverte!
There is no evidence that Sanskrit is 2500 years old it is just a rumor and nonsense
@@devotion240
Sanskrit generally connotes several Old Indo-Aryan language varieties. The most archaic of these is the Vedic Sanskrit found in the Rig Veda, a collection of 1,028 hymns composed between 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE by Indo-Aryan tribes migrating east from what are today Afghanistan across northern Pakistan and into northwestern India. Vedic Sanskrit interacted with the preexisting ancient languages of the subcontinent, absorbing names of newly encountered plants and animals; in addition, the ancient Dravidian languages influenced Sanskrit's phonology and syntax.
Sanskrit can also more narrowly refer to Classical Sanskrit, a refined and standardized grammatical form that emerged in the mid-1st millennium BCE and was codified in the most comprehensive of ancient grammars, the Aṣṭādhyāyī ('Eight chapters') of Pāṇini.
The greatest dramatist in Sanskrit, Kālidāsa, wrote in classical Sanskrit, and the foundations of modern arithmetic were first described in classical Sanskrit.
The two major Sanskrit epics, the Mahābhārata and the Rāmāyaṇa, however, were composed in a range of oral storytelling registers called Epic Sanskrit which was used in northern India between 400 BCE and 300 CE, and roughly contemporary with classical Sanskrit.
In the following centuries, Sanskrit became tradition-bound, stopped being learned as a first language, and ultimately stopped developing as a living language.
Try📚researching before🗣replying?
🇨🇦✌🏻📜♥️(+🇺🇦)✨🌎💫
@@rinalore The Native sanskrit speakers brahmins are just as nomadic in the past as the modern roma gypsies. As bramins were nomads and therefore the influence of the other dialect(European, Russian and Asian) on sanskrit. Sanskrit is a mixture of many dialect and it has developed words from other language and dialect to make itself better.
Some religions originated in the indian subcontinent and were professionally marketed(practiced) by the sanskrit speaking brahmins. Once native sanskrit speakers brahmins are nomads and later brahmins are preachers they declared their mixed dialect divine and culture as vedic. Sanskrit spread religiously rather than as a better dialect.
There are 300 variants of Ramayana in the world most of which are in written form except Valmiki Ramayana. Ramayana and Mahabharata have spread orally in many cultures and so has the Sanskrit Valmiki Ramayana, so there is nothing to emphasize.
@@rinalore These dates of 1500 BC etc. are all hogwash ... no scientific basis. These dates were decided by colonial historians of 19th century based on Biblical belief that the world was made in 4000 BC so anything cannot be older than that.
@@devotion240 You seem to be snorting something powerful.
INDIA.... always proud to be an Indian
उदाहरणमेव असदुक्तमनेन अत्र
Special congratulated University of Cambridge, and your hardworking..
Congratulations brother!! You did a great job !! 👏👏👏👏 India is proud of u ...and i am feeling very very proud of my culture and ancient geniuses...👏👏👏👏👏
There are too many irregularities and contradictions in this work. The puzzle has not been solved. The only bit that is clear is how eager they are to declare that there has been a breakthrough, without thorough research, debate and validation .
Great brother, we are proud of you 🙏🙏❤️❤️😍😍👌👌
A Rishi of our times to complement the Maharshi Panini of our heritage. Poetic! ❤
Congratulations on your discovery. In these AI times it will be interesting to learn how this will affect machine learning.
The difficulty of Sanskrit grammar has been removed today, but with the help of which script, can anyone tell this, and 2500 years ago which script was used to write Sanskrit🤔