THE GENETIC ORIGINS OF THE ANCIENT ISRAELITES
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 янв 2024
- In this video we discuss the genetic origin of the Ancient Israelites by exploring their ancestry through a variety of different time periods.
-----------------------------------------------
* DEEP ANCESTRY ANALYSIS *
ko-fi.com/ancestralbrew/commi...
-----------------------------------------------
SOURCES USED IN VIDEO:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15300...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25079...
www.nature.com/articles/s4146...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti....
Samaritan Video: The Samaritans: A Biblical People (Trailer) - The Samaritans: A Biblical People
Dir. Moshe Alafi (Documentary, Israel, 2022, 78 min)
Bronze Age collapse video: Ancient Apocalypse - The Sea People: Catalysts of Bronze Age Collapse | Full Documentary by Get.factual
-----------------------------------------------
WATCH MY CREATE CONTENTION TUTORIAL HERE:
• HOW TO CREATE VIRAL AI...
-----------------------------------------------
My SOCIAL MEDIA, Let's connect!
TikTok: / ancestralbrew
Instagram: / ancestralbrew
* If you have any questions please leave a comment below and I will reply. Thank you so much for watching see you on the next video! :-)
As a geneticist, this was actually really well done. You employed the right models (your interpretation of principal component analysis was on point), and you connected it with history at a high level. Fascinating stuff and good use of the research.
He is the GOAT this guy. Love his videos are so professional.
His video was a bit sloppy imo. Too much history, too little about genetics. Also, the pictures he used don't seem accurate at all. The Natufians certainly weren't that dark skinned. Many Levantine people are white skinned. This isn't because of Europe. Europeans get much of their genes from the Middle East, in fact. So there must have been light skinned people in the Levant in the Bronze age, and many would have had colored eyes, like their descendants.
I think in life sometimes when your ideology doesn’t match with the fact, maybe it’s better to change the ideology and not the facts. 😂 I don’t think you watched the whole video because the majority of it is comparing genetic samples of modern people in the region with ancient samples of Israelites and the modern Samaritan populations. Videos is solid!
@@jawadmaniaci91 Are you replying to my comment? You probably didn't understand what I said. I said that the pictures aren't accurate. They're probably generated by AI. And that inaccuracy is irresponsible. There is no way that everybody was dark like that. There are Samaritans and other Levantines now with light features. So why is he choosing only dark skinned pictures? There's an inherent bias there. An assumption that middle easterners are dark. When the majority of Levantines have light features.
@@aag3752images created with artificial intelligence, I don't know how precise they are but it doesn't matter, they absolutely have no influence on the quality and accuracy of the topic, excellently addressed and exposed in the video which does not deal with the appearance of ancestral and ancient populations but with their proximity genetics to modern peoples
There is evidence that many Palestinians had ancestors who were once Jews. Israeli researcher Tsvi Misinai conducted anthropological research throughout several Palestinian villages. According to his findings, there are certain customs and traditions among the Palestinians that are of Judaic origins.
It’s obvious because arabisation and islamisation of Palestinians doesn’t make them any less Israelite. They’re farmers, tied to the land for millennia, they never left like merchants and pastoralists would.
No the have no Jews ancestors although they have Isralites ancetors. Not all Jews are Israelite and not all Israelite are jews. Few israelites are muslims
@@shoutoutph5227 get yourself proper education, muslim is religion , not human DNA.
@@shoutoutph5227
Shut it, Ziotard
Converted white European Shephardi, ashkenazi's...black Ethiopian jews,indian jews are not related to israhelites
I did FamilyTree DNA & Ancestry DNA, am 13% mizrahi jewish, 81% southern Levantine Canaanite, 2% Yemenite Jewish 3% Sephardic Jewish,1% Caucasus/Mesopotamian area. But am a Palestinian 😮
Was that a shock? You aren't the only one. A lot of Muslims through DNA tests found out great granny of grandpa turned out to be Jewish.
Forced conversion
@@francisco7661 None of my ancestors were forced. I have 43% Jewish DNA. It's called accepting the truth :)
So, the ruling class in Israel is no longer Muslim, so you can revert to Judaism. Problem solved.@@Chatelaine0
@@jaycorwin1625why would they convert into Judaism
Hi, I’m one of the Samaritans actually, really great video, I’m from the Cohen family as well , after doing the DNA test from 23andMe it turned out the same as you mentioned , thank you for pointing this out!😊
Can I ask a religious Question?
Samaritans only use the Torah but not the rest of the Tanakh.
But what do Samaritans think of the apocrypha (example Book of Enoch, Jubilees, Tobit, etc)
😍
Sure ,In the community we believe only the first five Books of Moses (Torah) was given on Mount Sinai, and it was divine, however, we also have our own version of Joshua, and other books we inherited, in terms of Enoch. There are beliefs that are not written in the Torah about him. These are they also from the same book you’re talking about. But today we do not read them as much. Meaning we do not ignore what’s in them, but we mostly focus on Torah.
@@AboodCohen is there a taboo on these apocrypha texts (tobit, midrash, jubilees and whatever else is an example) or can a Samaritan read it without stigma?
@@AboodCohen I'm personally a Enochite religion. Meaning I revere enoch as the most important prophet.
I do *not* worship him.
I worship the Adonai Elohai.
But from Jubilees, Book of Enoch and Jasher, I consider Enoch as the most important prophet.
If everyone was this informed, we would have peace 🕊️
He's not informed at all.
Well this is all wrong for several reasons entirely...
The Bible does not really make any reference to the ancient Israelites appearance, but there are clues in the Bible that they did not look like the present-day demographic in the region, and you have to remember that Israel was divided into two kingdoms, the northern Kingdom of Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judah.
Secondly, the Jews present in Israel today have a very miniscule amount of true Israelite ancestry any way, and they could not possibly genetically account for the ancestry of all the other tribes, being that they are only descended from one.
There were thirteen tribes in ancient Israel.
Dan
Judah
Levi
Simeon
Issachar
Naphtali
Asher
Gad
Reuben
Zebulun
Joseph
Ephraim
Manasseh
Those tribes disappeared millennia ago, so claiming to have an accurate understanding of ancient Israel's genetic origins is impossible...
I'll give you one clue... After the sacking of Israel during the reign of Ashurbanipal 721 B.C. and Nebuchadnezzar 651 B.C., so roughly between the 7th-8th centuries, while those tribes went into captivity and disappeared a suddenly new people never before mentioned in recorded history appear in the historical record, specifically in the work of Herodotus, when we the reader learn for the first time of these new people, a nomadic warrior nation known as Scythia suddenly burst on the scene, is it coincidence then that just around the time the northern kingdom of Israel disppears into obsecurity, the Scythians suddenly emerge out of it?!
@@Ariapeithes_ The Bible is a work of fiction, not history.
@@Ariapeithes_
Looks like it's you who is not well informed and attentive. Cause the video clearly covered what you said in the first paragraph. The analysis covered both bronze as well as iron Age periods. Most importantly,it respectfully acknowledged the different narratives regarding identity issues besides mere DNA analysis.
@@Ariapeithes_
Yeah probably the lost tribes of Israel after were exiled by the Assyrians mixed with the Scythians germanic people in the Caucasus, for generations, and migrated to central Asia, and from there to West Europe, and their upper mesopotamic related Anatolian DNA mixed with Canaanites got reduced, and these bones of ancient Israelites who had already mixed with ancient Canaanites belong to the period before the Assyrian exile and their DNA remained intact, but since the tribe of Judah from which the Jews come had not been exiled by the Assyrians, they still preserve a DNA related to the ancient canaanites as result of admixture.
@@Ariapeithes_ so your evidence is this book said so, but you ignore literal DNA studies.
As a fellow Mountain Jew, my community’s endangered language was always very Semitic and had modern Arabic’s sounds and elements. We always looked much more like other Jewish communities from Syria and Iraq and even middle eastern Arabs than the people from Azerbaijan (the place we resided for 1,000+ years). Nonetheless, I’ve always wondered if my family’s history was, in fact, true, especially after seeing the entire world suddenly question my identity. I’m very grateful for your video and now feel more proud of who I am. I hope we can all watch this and ultimately become better people as a result. Thank you, sir
I remember that a Sephardic Rabbi once tried to reach at you but you were so isolated he got lost and ended in Russia, Persia and Georgia trying to find you but even Caucasian Jews in Tblisi didn't knew how to find you and said "Ask The Qoba Jews! They may know."
But Israelisi Jews in Qoba didn't knew quite well either and he ended up in Bukhara teaching Jews about Maimonides there instead.
Bir türk olduğunu inkarmı ediyorsun ??
We have three syrian jews who are long time friends of my family. Im a muslim syrian although i dont particularly identify with religion. Those syrian jews we know are not at all different from us in how they look. They don't look distinguishable unless they open their mouth to say they are jews. Your identitt is not in your religion not even in your race. But dont confuse religion with race. Sure a certain religious group has its own distinctions because they mostly refused to marry someone coming from another lamd with a different belief . But ppl also converted to different religions. An ideology is one thing and a race is another. We all are the result of the mixture of different races more or less.. Thats what constitute our dna. Not our ideology. Jews in syria had a syrian passport like me and were never looked at as different. At least not in damascus where my parents have lived for generations
@@KenanKlnc-qb3qf Absolutely. My parents and grandparents and speak fluent Azeri, but, by blood, we’re not Turks at all. Best case, brother, maybe a small percentage. My DNA tests results contained 96% Middle Eastern/Iranian DNA.
@@KenanKlnc-qb3qf we are not turks . No turkic blood in our dna 😂
Thank you for not having any bias towards any one side, just pure research and no agenda. Thank you sir
I'm both a biologist and a peace activist here in Israel-Palestine, I thought that this video was really well done and with a very positive message. I have a group of Israelis and Palestinians that are working together on a peace proposal. We have a section on Mutual Recognition of Historic Connection and I added a link to this video since I think that it really captures the message that we want to convey about using research on ancestry and history as a way to bring people together
Very interested!
link in my bio@@GoodmanRecordingsTokyo
It’s hard to bring people together when one side is a European Nazi cult that thinks they own the world and the land because of some fairy god they worship.
TRYING TO SEE THIS BS TO HIDE YOUR BIBLICAL ETHNICIYT
There is no "palestine" nor is there a "palestinian" people. They are regional arabs mainly of Egyptian and arabian descent.
The ancient Israelites were mostly Canaanites who embraced the worship of Yahweh with an Amorite immigrant minority “Abraham and his descendants,” meaning they were not much different from the rest of the inhabitants of the land of Canaan genetically, and three-quarters of the genes of the current population of Palestine are from the ancient inhabitants of Canaan, and the other quarter is mostly Greek and Arab
THS should be the top comment. This is the truth. There was no huge Israelite kingdom, exodus never happened, and the stories were written years after the time.
@@paperringpink In fact, I am religious and I believe in the Exodus, but as a Muslim, the story of the Exodus in our religion is not as detailed as it is in the Bible. Therefore, I can accept the bulk of the modern scientific hypothesis for the emergence of the Israelites. What I think is that there was an Amorite immigrant nucleus “Abraham and his family” that gathered around it Canaanite Nomad individuals from the desert of the land of Canaan who formed the tribe of Israel. This tribe was exiled to Egypt, then returned and gradually spread its Jehovah religion among the Canaanites tribes by preaching, marriage and war and everyone who embraced this religion became Israelite in few generation until the historic Kingdom of Israel was formed
@@akramkarim3780 Tbh, I thought abraham was from the ubaid culture since he brought haplogroup J into the region. J is the most common haplogroup amongst arabs and Jews. Also the Ubaid culture was in his hometown of Ur in southern Iraq. Thats just my theory.
@@drbek597 If we assume that Abraham was from the Ubaid culture, this would make him very ancient compared to the historical events with which he is connected. The most likely thing is that he was an Amorite from an Amorite family that migrated to southern Iraq, where he was born, and then returned again to its original homeland in Syria
@@akramkarim3780 Yeah i just realized the ubaid culture was wayy before abrahams time which was approximately 2000 BC. But yeah what you said made sense. But many people say that he was instead aramean as well as the bible. Are arameans and amorites the same or different?
I am speechless as usual! Your work enlightens us with what cutting edge technology has to offer, all wrapped up in an easy to follow commentary.. brilliant!!
you do the best analysis on genetic origins
As a LEBANESE person, I want to say 3 things.
1. We "Middle Easterners" are very diverse, genetically. The Levantine countries are more similar to each other, but still different. Lebanon generally has the whitest people in the region, our dna deriving primarily from the Levant and Caucuses, and secondarily from Europe. Our DNA is similar to the northern Palestinians he's talking about, who also have light features. And to Syrians who border us also. We do not look like Mizrahi Jews. So the point is, there are different ancestries, and many of us have Caucasian features (particularly in Lebanon).
2. The Palestinians are more native than modern day Jews that migrated there. In contrast, many Jews came from the outside in recent times. Except for Mizrahis.
3. To be transparent, I'm no supporter of political Zionism. But I have to agree with AncestralBrew, genes aren't everything. I personally don't think the Israel-Palestine conflict should be decided by genes at all. While we should acknowledge the fact that Palestinians are definitely native to the land, this does not mean that the Jews who came from Europe don't belong there. You can't just claim land based on ancestry. I'm 100% Lebanese, with some of my dna going back to the Romans, the Levant, and the Caucuses. Does this give me a right to claim Italy, Israel, and Turkey now? To put it more emphatically, Lebanese have the most Canaanite DNA of anybody in the world, according to recent genetic studies. But if we go by that, then Lebanese have the greatest claim to the entire region. And the Jews and even Palestinians should pack up and leave. Obviously, that would be absurd. Instead of going by DNA, I think the so-called holy land should be split fairly between people who were born and raised there. Easier said than done, I get it. But that would be the model to go by, not genetics.
i'd like to add that ashkenazi jews also do trace 50% of their linigage to the levant. but i really agree. if we are gonna debate over genetics, that is a very slippery slope.
I believe that the existence of Israel is entirely unethical for these very reasons and much more. there should be a single democratic state based on equal HUMAN rights for all, economic ownership of society to the people, and the right of return to the displaced palestinian diaspora and it should be called Palestine. Yes it is easier said than done no doubt, but there will be no peace until the injustice of the zionist settler-colonial project is dismantled and a state forged on equality and rights for all is established.
@@sab5686 Most Ashkenazy Jews still look eastern Mediterranean to me. Some are pretty white, this is true. But there's still something Levantine about them, so I don't doubt what you're saying.
@@sab5686 I agree, i certainly don't base my arguments on what should happen primarily on genetics, though the fact is that Zionist ideology forces the issue on genetics by directly trying to erase the indigenous Palestinian population and identity from the land and replace it with a colonial ethno-state that wipes away the rich history and mixed cultural identity of the land from thousands of years of history. I ultimately believe in a single state based on equality for all.
Olá! Sabias que aqui no Brasil temos 10, milhões de descendentes de sírios-libaneses,? A maior Diáspora destes povos fora das suas terras nativas!
Hebrew is a Semitic language, from the Afro-Asiatic language family, known as the language of the Jews and the Samaritans. It belongs to the Canaanite language family and is the only Canaanite language spoken today
What was reuben and simeon calling? And all the other tribes of Israel .... I need rock solid information.
Ya coz Arabic not a semitic language 😂 Palestinian are the real Jews. No surprise there.
@AwesCapsian Nearly all Jews are real Jews. This isn't a game of whos the favorite.
@@iminavegetativestatestudio1730 no they are not . 90% European you are European.
but only scholars used Hebrew for 2k years, while doing research. Modern Hebrew was made up by one guy after Israel was created. There were many words that didn't exist and for those he used Arabic or made words up
Great and thorough job Ali 👌
We have been waiting for this for q while
Love it bro thanks
Great video as usual.
American of Mexican descent here.. my dna shows I have levant dna from my father and I share dna with several Anatolian bodies they have found as well as one Natufian male body they have found. I am a converted Jew and I am often told by the Palestinian supporters that I am fake .. thanks for making a video proving I’m not crazy.
Ps. I also have Philistine dna
So dont you have any percentage of Latine or Roman or Spanish or European DNA ? Are you a pure Jew as a direct decendant of Jacob ? You have a mixed DNA. Same as many Palestininans. But Palestininans born and live in Palestine not in Mexico , America or Russia or German . Palestine is their birth land. But your ancesters came from Mexico . So they are right. You cannot claim Israel as your country. Your country is America or Mexico. Most Jews always says Palestininans are Arabs from Makkah . That is also a big lie. Palestinans too have mixed Levent DNA and are born and live in Palestine . Palestinans have high percentage of Cananites DNA . Palestininans too have Jewish DNA.That is their land.. You cannot claim Israel is your promised land because you are a Jew, so as many European Jews. Then why do you live in America ? That was not your country . It belonged to native Americans .😅😂😂 . Most of Jews have mixed DNA . There are black Jews, white Jew, Yellow Jew, blond Jew, German Jew, Slavic Jew, Asian Jew, Indian Jew , Persian Jew , Arabic Jew, Russian Jew , Ethiopen Jew , Chinese Jew. Moroccan Jew , Spanish Jew, . Jews have different ethicities, different colour of skin and faces. If all Jews around the world claim their land is Israel/ Palestine , definitely Palestinian supporters will call that you are FAKE and they are 100 % right in their claim.
First of all , you are not 100 % pure direct decentant of Jacob . Secondly , there were many tribes lived in current Israel in stone age , Iron age and copper age long before Jacob was born . They lived even before Abraham migrated to Canan. Occupying and Harassing native people live in Palestine by using a religious book is a basic human rights violation . It should not be happen in the world. Christians live all over World. Can all of them claim Italy or Vatican is their country ? Muslims live all over the world, can all of them claim Saudi is their country ? Your ancesters live 2000+ or 1000 + years in Europe and mingled and mixed with others . Then you have right to claim Palestinians' lands and houses are your lands ? Your Jewish people are not only fake but also thieves. Sorry .
Your DNA connection comes from Spain, many moors comes from the levent, that's why many latin south American have some Arab DNA due to the inquisition.
very good very good keep making videos about the Semitic people now make a video about the Nabataeans
Nabateans, the original Arabs
Nabateans were not the original Arabs they were just a well known set that left the interior to make a north western kingdom
@@peesandford4681 Ok, then who were the original Arabs? Because the sources I’ve seen point to the Nabateans being the original Arabs or at least the direct descendants of proto-Arabs.
nah they aren't simply read about Qedarites kingdom for example
@@peesandford4681They definitely did not "leave the interior" Arabs are found all over the Middle East, including the Levant, especially the southern levant.
Great video. So basically, if we base it purely on genetics, the argument that Israelis have rights to land over the Palestinians is false. As both are descendants of the biblical Israelites.
The argument is they have the right for the land for their religion, not their blood or for be native. Muslims use same argument.
The bible was written 300-400 years after the events happened and do not tell actual history. You do not gain claim of land based off a book, sorry. Israelites did not exist. Which has been proven by archeology. This work in this video is done by Israel and is pushing a false narrative so they can continue to steal Palestine.
True, but neither do the Palestinians. Unfortunately many Muslims don't want to accept that a tiny part of the Middle East isn't an Islamic nation 😕
No they are European jews and have no dna to the land
@@adamnesico if that’s all it takes, I think I might start worshipping Jupiter and the ancient Roman gods so I have a claim on most of the meditation….. except in winter when I might worship the Aztec gods so I have somewhere warm to go on holidays 😂😂
Very well done; I appreciate your respectful approach! Peace to you too!🕊
I am grateful for these videos, and I hope they help people see we should stand together as brothers and sisters. Remembering that corporations and banks make trillions, and gain land from the death and destruction of the innocent. We are not each other’s enemies my beloveds no matter how the narrative is pushed.
This ❤
The Israeli
Military is the official army for those banks and corporations.
Love the way the video keeps on reminding that the region had a diverse mix population.
Thank you for your video 🙏
As a Jew, what a beautfiful video on this with no hate. We need that. Sending love to you, and every group in the diverse and culturally rich levant
This video kicked off with a huge fallacy. One of the two samples, the J-ZS241 sample in particular which is used as a genetic proxy for Ancient Israelites, is associated with Pre-Israelite Canaanite populations in the Levant who at their genesis are more genetically related to various Hurro-Urartian derived groups like the Mittani, Guttians, Hurrians etc. who entered the Levant during the mid-Bronze Age and assimilated into, as well as invaded, conquered and precipitated the collapse of several indigenous Semitic civilizations such as the Ebla civilization in Syria as well as the Akkadian empire.
The Eblaites and Akkadians in all likelihood, are the most closely related ancestral population to the Israelites, who themselves were most likely descendants of the Natufians who were Proto-Semites. Bronze Age Canaanites are descendants of Kura-Araxes civilization who were not Semitic speakers, initially, but adopted the language later from indigenous Semites in the region (descendants of Natufians). The Israelites and Canaanites were absolutely NOT the same people, based upon what the Israelites wrote about themselves as well as the Canaanites.
In the generally accepted timeframe where Abraham would've began his migration away from his homeland in Southern Mesopotamia, is coincidentally the exact same time when several Hurro-Urartian groups, along with the Amorites who were heavily assimilated with these groups, invaded and took over Akkad, Ebla and Ur (Abraham's homeland). And you can observe the animus between Abraham and his tribe and descendants and the Hurro-Urartian/Amorite descendants (Bronze Age Canaanites) All over the Torah/Tanakh.
Additional evidence is found in some of the names of the enemies of the Israelites that they encountered as they left Egypt and entered the Levant. Several names of Canaanites and Canaanite tribes that were conquered by the Israelites were Hurrian derived linguistically. Sheshai and Talmai (Joshua 15:14) The Perrizites, Girgashites and Hivites are of Hurrian origin (Hess et al.). While the Hittites and Jebusites are thought to be of Indo-European origin. These are the groups that Bronze Age Canaanite DNA samples belong to, not the Israelites.
The Israelites most likely derive from the Southern Mesopotamian originiated Nomadic Habiru (Hebrews), Who have the exact same migration pattern, were slaves in Egypt just like the Israelites and they invaded the land of Canaan after being slaves in Egypt as documented in the Amarna letters
Israelites = Egypto-Habiru (Descendants of Natufians/Proto-Semites)
Bronze Age Canaanites = Hurro-Urartian (Descendants of Kura-Araxes culture)
Two completely different peoples.
Good points. I think the video is well-intended, but falls completely short of identifiying ancient Israelites. He did not even use archaeological findings to bolster the true phenotype of the Israelites-- which would actually lend credence to the Ashkenazi claim over the Mizrachi claim that. Meaning, ancient Jews actually looked like Ashkenazi, with lighter hair, some even having fair eyes. One thing I might correct you on, the Jews were not natufians. The Jews, Israelites, came from north of the Euphrates and before that they migrated from Mt. Ararat, Turkey. That is to say, the Jews are from north of the original spot of the natufians. They were not native to the Levant, in all reality. However, Jews were granted the land of the canaanites. But make no mistake, they were not natufians. They had lighter skin, and they were from further north than most suspect.
Fascinating report, thank you.
Very good presentation. Enjoyed viewing that.
Under 1000 people 8:15
Samaritans marking Passover on Mount Gerizim near Nablus
Total population
~874 (2022)[1]
large population in nablus had samaritans ancestry to
@@isyraf9989 explain
@@MR707Vlogs few centuries ago especially during the Ottomans era Samaritans in Nablus were converted to islam as you can see those samaritans were become muslims they had certain family name as a sign of their samaritans heritage
@isyraf9989 Nablus had a population of 157,000 in 2017 are you telling me 10's of millions of people are only 157k and are you sure who isn't Turkish?
@@MR707Vlogs probably some of them had turkic ancestry due to the Ottomans rule but based on a article I read many Palestinian in Nablus were descendants of Samaritans that convert to Islam of course they no longer considered as Samaritans since their ancestor convert to Islam
If the analysis would be conducted focusing on maternal lineage, would the results differ substantially?
The percentages take into account all ancestry, but when it comes to haplogroups I think Jews have a higher frequency of Levantine paternal haplogroups than Levantine maternal ones even despite the whole "being Jewish comes from your mother" thing.
@@Threezi04 That's merely Jewish law, most Jews in Israel are secular, additionally per Jewish law you are Jewish if you convert or are born to an ethnic Jewish mother, after the exile approximately 20,000 Jews in Italy married with local women, these women would convert.
Excellent video , Love thst it stuck to the genetic facts and didn’t make it all about the current conflict
Is there any way to calculate how many people who have unknown Jewish ancestory?
I find it very interesting that apart from Samaritans, modern day middle eastern Christians (Palestinians, Jordanians, etc.) have the closest genetic distance to ancient Israeli DNA samples. So perhaps, modern day middle eastern Christians are the true descendants of ancient Israelis.
The first followers of Jesus were from the Jewish community. It would make sense that a substantial part of the heritage of Christian people living in the Levant would be from Jews of that era. These people would have adopted the Arabic language as it became the lingua franca of the Middle East under the Rashidun Caliphate. As generations passed and their identity became more Christian, they have forgotten their Jewish roots. What was really interesting is how the Arab Christians have the most ancestry from ancient Jews, and the Yemenite Jews have more actual Arabian ancestry than the people who identify as Arabs.
@@marcdigiambattista751 It's all fascinating. Arabs largely came from the north while Yemenis have been there for awhile and Yemenite Jews would mostly marry other Yemenite Jews. My family are Palestinian Syrian Christians who speak and pray in Aramaic, we sing Halelyu'Yah, praising Yah as the Jews do, my dad and sister look like Adam Sandler and 2 of my other sisters are red headed (likely from Levantine Amorites from Syria). We also however, preserve our ancient roots that go back farther than Judaism, though Judaism is a big part of our heritage. Also remember that Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism developed along side each other, branching out of second temple era Judaism, so most of us that became Christians early on, were not rooted in Rabbinic Judaism.
The modern day Jews are the true descendants of the Israelites as a majority of them maintained their culture and rarely much converts to the religion.
@@xplicitgoofy1015 Nope. Most of them mixed with other ethnic groups. Like Ashkenazi Jews, for instance. Half of their DNA comes from Europe
@@xplicitgoofy1015 There were two kingdoms, Samaria (Israel) and Judah....much of the Israelites in the Northern Kingdom did not become Jews. Samaritans preserved their ancient Israelite traditions and are still here today. Palestinian Christians branched out of second temple era Judaism while much of the other second temple era Jews then became Rabbinic Jews .
Excellent Study. I agree with the comment above that the PCA was done properly. (Mulitvariate anaysis is my area of expertise) I'm an Israeli archaeologist and the connection to Natufian and Neolithic populations is particularly interesting. It looks like a good, solid study. I am sharing it. I am sure you have a professional paper coming out of this, and I'd love to get a copy if you do.
Great video and quite accurate, looking for one about Egyptians DNA soon ❤
Great and very interesting video!
Question - are some of the persons in the clip AI? Or is it all photography? May I have the link/name of the photographer/artist/AI programmer? (Not for commercial purposes)
Thank u v much and sure will keep exploring your videos
I love this video, this helps to make peace in Levant where going wars, they don't rememer real similar genetics, despite religion and ethnicity
The genetic history of the peoples who made up the Middle East in the Bronze Age is very similar to what is mentioned in the Book of Genesis, in that the Canaanites were the first in the Levant and originated from Ham "north Africa" just like the Netufians, and the Semites are from Mesopotamia and their migration after the flood and just like the Neolithic Iranian farmers from Iraq, and the Anatolians were the Japhethites, Abraham migtation are like the Amorites migration
as if the ones who wrote this book wrote it based on oral traditions dating back to the Neolithic era
We do not need your Christian religion. Your Christian religion is the cause of all the problems in the world. I am proud to be an atheist Palestinian, abandoning the superstitions of religions.
The genesis of humanity traces back to prehistoric eras, extending beyond the inception of human civilization - perhaps even when our ancestors swam as fishes in primordial oceans. It's vital to acknowledge that our presence isn't solely a product of individual desires. Amid conflicts, viewing each other as interconnected siblings, transcending diverse religions, cultures, and languages, becomes paramount. Each of us holds a unique significance in the vast, enigmatic expanse of our cosmic home, a fleeting existence amidst countless stars. The universe, intriguingly, resides within each of us. We are made of atoms, and atoms can't be destroyed?........
Can you do vid on the Han Chinese? Is their belief in the multi regional hypothesis of human evolution correct and that their race evolved in China and not in Africa?
Multiple origins is nonsense. There are many countries similar to China. Humanity originated in Africa or a region. The center of civilization is in the Middle East, but the most suitable place to live is at the point between China and India. Being suitable for living does not mean civilization. The highest, the highest civilization does not mean supporting a large population. Humanity is divided into two large ethnic groups, blacks and whites. After the two are mixed, the subspecies are continuously mixed, and more subspecies can be produced until the East Asian race is produced. , black people are suitable for high temperatures and white people are suitable for low temperatures. If there was only one kind, human beings would have become extinct long ago. With diversity, we would not be easily extinct. If the temperature of the earth rises, white people will be very sad. That is why Europe and the United States are so afraid of global warming. Black people Not afraid or even looking forward to hot spots again, so that they can dominate the world without war. But if the temperature of the earth drops, it will not be good for black people. Black and white mixed blood can adapt to more complex temperatures and climates, and black and white mixed blood in the highlands has the highest survivability. The purpose of existence of the two subspecies of black and white is to survive better. The single risk is too high and cannot evolve.
Black bears cannot survive in the Arctic, and polar bears cannot survive in warm areas. The mixture of the two produces bears with both black and white characteristics. The most extreme one is the panda. Bears are exactly the same as humans, and their evolutionary trajectories are very close.
@@user-mm7zi4ue7d surely you’re not suggesting the Han are the result of racial admixture and genetic contamination?
@@user-mm7zi4ue7d
Bears are exactly the same as humans ? lol.
Anybody who suggests humans evolved in multiple regions is not just a racist ultranationalist but also allergic to actual scientific evidence and reasoning and has zero understanding of how evolutions works
So it would seem Ethiopian Jews are not ethnically Jewish at all
100%
Judaism is a sect and the first people to embrace it were the children of Israel, but many of them embraced Christianity and Islam
They are only a tiny tiny percentage, but still they can call themselves native if they so wish because that tiny tiny percent is pure Levantine and they speak Canaanite language and practice Ancient Israelite religion.
😮 GREAT VIDEO 😮
@I.b.d
How do you look like with all that addmixture of genetic background? Do you look European, Middle Eastern, Adian, North European, or what?
The general look of middle easterners is tanned skin, black hair and brown eyes. Ashkenazis who have 20% north European ancestry sometimes have blue eyes or red hair and complexion similar to the one common in Italy.
@@shlomomarkman6374 Some Palestinian and Syrian Arabs also have red hair and blue eyes.
I am talking about the Israelites and Hebrews before Judaism was codified. if you listened, the Caanites mixed with the Israelites. It took a couple of hundred of years for the Israelites to move from polytheism to montheism during the time of Moses. The ancient Israelites were a mix of different Semitic tribes. The Palestinians were not there at that time.
Actually before, they are from Abraham/Hagar/Ishmael/12 sons, Abraham first born. Palestinians and todays Jews, have the same Haplogroup J.
No, the fact that Ishmael was a few or several years older than Isaac does not make a convincing case. They were not in the land of Biblical Israel then either. Remember Ishamel was an illegitimate son since Hagar was the servant used to bear children. Once Sarah became pregnant with Isaac there was not a need for a mistress. They did live in this triangulated arrangement for awhile, but there was a reason why Haar and Ishamel were expelled. in the bible, there is a passage that indicates Ishamel touched Isaac inappropriately. The establishment of the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah were from the line of Isaac. There was no sovereign Palestinian state in ancient and modern times. Geneticist state that the modern Palestinians came during a particular century and are from Greek/Phoenician origins. The current conflict is not new since the Arabs have had the most intense hatred towards jews since the expulsion of Hagar. The conflict is rooted from Sarah & Hagar, and definitely between Isaac and Ishamel.@@davidharrigan9884
DNA has nothing to do with location, and time period, it is God's mark of creation. Thats why we can look back, and identify each race, in history. Jews and Arabs lived in peace for 1500 years, they have the same Haplogroup. Jews have no separate Haplogroup, and they are people of religion not race. @@Karen-dk1ec
@@Karen-dk1ecok Zionist. I stopped at Ishmael was an illegitimate son of Hagar.
Jesus said, you say you are, but are not. They said we are of Abraham, not Jacob, they said they have never been in captivity. Herod and his family were Idumean. Jesus was talking to the rulers of the temple, not the Israelities who returned.
1.Saul/Paul left the building, when he realized.
2. Israelites never killed any Children
@@Karen-dk1ec
As a Jewish person I love the ending of your video the peaceful flags together.
Great video! In a side note your channel only has eurasians ancient history. Are you planning on doing some videos on sub Saharan Africans in the future. They’re thousands of ethnic groups across the African continent for more video content.
How are you running this ? I want ato aware the Autosomal profiles were able
I’d love if you had 1,000 Israelite samples instead of 2. I want to do the test and do the deeper dive with you. Amazing channel, great work. So fascinating and wonderful and has enlightened me to the rich beautiful diversity we have today based on some core ingredients. Looking forward to your continued mini docs.
You have to realize that the 2 samples are literally ancient samples that were preserved well enough to extract ancient DNA from. two samples may not be anywhere as refined and holistic as 1,000 samples, but it's what genetic archaeologist have to work with.
Odd As a Palestinian-Syrian Arab Muslim from my Palestinian (father's) side I have some jewish very likely Samaritan ancestry since I come from Nablus a homeland to many Samaritans in the past and even present.
Actually there are so many families in your city Naples their grandparents were Samaritans and then converted to Islam
@@DANIAL101
True, we are the locals of the area who never left but intermixed or assimilated to incoming peoples and cultures. Any claim that we are Saudi Arabians is false since those descending from Yemen and Parts of Saudi Arabia in Palestine are very little but even if thats true, lets say we are all Saudi Arabians who migrated a 1000 years ago. Isnt 1000 years enought to make us natives to the land? The English Anglo-saxons migrated to england roughly 1300 or 1200 years ago yet they are natives. The Slavic tribes migrated to the Balkans in the 7th-8th centuries then established political entities later on are they not natives? I am pretty sure that even if we are Saudi Arabians who migrated 1000 years ago (which we arent) it still makes us native to the land.
@@hishamalaker491 No 1000 years is not enough to make you native, and no Arabs migrated 1000 years ago other than the constantly on the move Bedouins. Yes, if you were once Samaritan, then you are native, and it is a right shame you converted to such a loser religion. All Palestinian Muslims do contain a percentage of Saudi Arabian though, and the Bedouins are mostly Saudis, and they are far more peaceful than the other Muslims in Israel, we get on rather well with them, like we do the Druze. I would consider going back to your roots if I were you and ditching your Islamic conversion which was probably forced upon you.
Please make a video specifically about modern Assyrians
Can you have a link to your site?
Can You Do A DNA 🧬 Genetic from Someone From Uganda 🇺🇬?
Very good
So fascinating. Knocked it out of the park again!
...should only be used to unite us, not divide us... I like this ♥...
Palestinian as a people is a modern identity during the British Mandate time and they are very diverse as well just like the Jews but somehow the genetic studies use population from certain regions which have higher population of Christians and Samaritans which constitute a very minute percentage of the whole Palestinian people.
The Palestinian genetic study should be done by including the information of which clans, tribes, families that they come from because each group are not mixing or intermarrying one another. They marry within their own clans/tribes (50% of marriage in Palestinian communities are cousin marriages).
There are actually Palestinians who descend from the modern diaspora Jews for instance the Makhamara clan in Yatta, Hebron have tradition of coming from Khaybar Jews which in turn were Yemenite Jews. In 1938 during the British Mandate, they still maintain their Jewish tradition like celebrating Hanukkah with the other Jews despite being Muslims.
There are also very notable great families among the Israeli Arabs in Haifa and the north as well as northen Palestinians known as Abulafia and Abuhasira who were descendant from Sephardic Jews who came to Ottoman Levant in 15th century from the Spanish Inquisition. Many Israeli Sephardi Jews with the same surname (Abuhatzira and Abulafia) who can trace their generations back to Ottoman times are from the same people who nnever convert to Islam.
Apart from the known modern day Jewish descendant clans/families there are also the prominent Husaini and Nusaybah clans are 7th CE Quraysh Arabs while the Abu Ghoshes are descendants of the 12 CE Eastern European Crusades and their Kurdish counterpart; al-Kurdi, the Nashashibis who are 15th CE Circassians, the Doghmush in Gaza who are 20th CE Turks, the Bushnak the 19th CE Bosniaks. There are also a Chechen neighbourhood in Abu Ghosh in Palestine who came in 19th century as well.
And don’t forget the Afro Palestinians and the nomadic Bedouin tribes who have been within their own communities since immemorial.
Where are their genetic profiles and why is this not mentioned at all and the results somehow suggest as if all of these people are uniform and homogeneously descended from the ancient Samaritans even prior to the Arab Conquest of the Levant in 7th century, prior to the Crusades, Mamluks, Ottoman and British period?
Very interesting. Thanks.
Bro your comment is a masterpiece, where do you have all that information regarding every clan?
Thank you bro, finally some logical guy in here who is a genius in this. Also I disagree about his point accusing the Israelites of being polytheists in the kingdom of Israel
In this video, he actually mentions how Palestinians are diverse and uses several samples from different parts of Palestine. It’s almost as if you didn’t even watch the video.
@@xplicitgoofy1015 they were polytheists in the kingdom of Israel - this is fact. There is not one historian who will dispute this, not even the Zionist ones. Monotheism didn’t come to the Israelites until the fall of the Babylonian empire.
So, I wonder if the modern Jews have any ancient Hebrew ancestry at all.
He did another video on ashkenazi and they are half middle eastern
The Palestinians are mixed also.
Modern Jews are Europeans. Palestinians have more ancient Canaanite DNA than European Jews.
Well this is all wrong for several reasons entirely...
The Bible does not really make any reference to the ancient Israelites appearance, but there are clues in the Bible that they did not look like the present-day demographic in the region, and you have to remember that Israel was divided into two kingdoms, the northern Kingdom of Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judah.
Secondly, the Jews present in Israel today have a very miniscule amount of true Israelite ancestry any way, and they could not possibly genetically account for the ancestry of all the other tribes, being that they are only descended from one.
There were thirteen tribes in ancient Israel.
Dan
Judah
Levi
Simeon
Issachar
Naphtali
Asher
Gad
Reuben
Zebulun
Joseph
Ephraim
Manasseh
Those tribes disappeared millennia ago, so claiming to have an accurate understanding of ancient Israel's genetic origins is impossible...
I'll give you one clue... After the sacking of Israel during the reign of Ashurbanipal 721 B.C. and Nebuchadnezzar 651 B.C., so roughly between the 7th-8th centuries, while those tribes went into captivity and disappeared a suddenly new people never before mentioned in recorded history appear in the historical record, specifically in the work of Herodotus, when we the reader learn for the first time of these new people, a nomadic warrior nation known as Scythia suddenly burst on the scene, is it coincidence then that just around the time the northern kingdom of Israel disppears into obsecurity, the Scythians suddenly emerge out of it?!
@@Ariapeithes_ You're using the bible as your central "source" of argumentation in place of valid and credible evidence such as what this video relies upon, which completely invalidates your argument full stop.
Really well done Ali.
Can you do a genetic make up of the Caribbean islands ? (Bahamas preferably)
Please make a video about Punjabi DNA from both modern day Pakistan and India.
يعني الفلسطينيون أجدادهم السامريون وهم من طايفه اليهود يعني الفلسطينيون هم السامريون والسامريون هم الفلسطينيون نفس الشي يعني الفلسطينيون هم سكان البلاد الأصليين وليس يهود بولندا وأوكرانيا
نعم بعض الفلسطينيين هم بني إسرائيل الاصليين و اختلطوا بالعرب
@@Semo99_ ليس بعض هذا التقرير يقول ٦٠ إلى ثمانين في الميه أصول الفلسطينين سامريه وهي فرقة من فرق اليهود يعني أكثرية
@@user-os2oh5kz8l نعم و هم من سبط لاوي من بن يعقوب عليه السلام ، وسبط منسي وأفرايم أبناء سيدنا يوسف عليه السلام
@@user-os2oh5kz8l No, this report says that 60-80% of what makes up an individual chosen to do the test is part Samaritan/Jew. Not 60-80% of the whole population. The people are cherry-picked, for most Palestinians are Egyptians or Lebanese or Bedouin.
Righteous video.
Thank you for making this video for me. As a believer in the Bible I was always interested in the genetics of the Israelites from the Bible because some people had varying thoughts on the genetics and race of the Israelites. I also like the design of the 3D models used to explain it.
We do not need your Christian religion. Your Christian religion is the cause of all the problems in the world. I am proud to be an atheist Palestinian, abandoning the superstitions of religions.
There was Violent mass Samaritan conversion to Islam in 19 century Grand Rabbi Osman empire tried hard to stop conversion of Samaritans in 19 cemetery However, significant part of Nablus city are Samaritans ancestors Again it depends on area
Religion of piece...
Not sure about that one since it violates the Shariah and since the 19th century was a period of decline in terms of the Ottomans in which the shariah had a weaker hold over the empire and they began to secularize. Even then yeah your kinda right in some cases during certain periods of either rebellions or anarchy Samaritans were forced to convert or did so out of convenience. About the Nablus one its intresting I am Palestinian-Syrian Arab Muslim from there. My Palestinian side is likely descended of these Samaritans as we are from Nablus and my grandpa kinda resembles them.
While you are right regarding the conversion of Samaritans keep in mind not all of it was forced, As in most cases it was by rebels or rioters during periods of Anarchy under Abbasid rule. Also the Samaritans were persecuted and massacred by everyone, be it their fellow jews or Byzantium or Crusaders or even the Ottomans however not all Muslim dynasties did prosecute them and some were in clear violation of the Shariah when they either forcefully converted them or conducted non-Islamic actions against them or other Muslims as Islamic history tends to be messy with many factions popping up either to rebel against the local authority or to make up a new heresy.
wow actually not long ago at all, such a shame
Prior to the existence of the Israelites and Canaanites, the region was inhabited by a people known as the Natufians. The people that have the most ancestry derived from the Natufians are the Yemenis from Mahra (70-75%). If I were to use zionist logic, this would mean that they have the most legitimate claim to the land of Israel/Palestine.
that isn't zionist logic.
In 2 years the migrant ar abs will claim they are netufians....
Thats after claiming they are
Cannanites
Philistines
A r abs
Zionist logic based less on dna, and more on the culture, history and the preservation of the native language of the land
Wrong. The Natufians largely descended from North Africans carrying Y-DNA haplogroup E1b1b as well as from Anatolian people carrying Y-DNA haplogroups J1 and then J2.
The Yemenites and other Southern Arabians, on the other hand, largely descend from Levantine and Northern Mesopotamian men who continued travelling into Southern Arabia and mixed with other people who were already living there (mainly people who had moved into that region already thousands of years ago from East Africa and whose descendants continued migrating Eastwards towards South Asia and Australia). They're called proto-Australoids.
Secondly, Jews also made their way into Arabia and many of them converted to Islam. Hence, it's not surprising to see Yemenites and other Arabians with Jewish/Levantine ancestry.
@@YehudaLion WELL SAID!!!! The Natufians mixed with other groups to FORM THE CANAANITES. Those who didn't mix in with them didn't because they were already elsewhere.
Will get your analysis on mine very soon!!!! When i have the results
Good research, somehow brings back old memories on age of mythology, i wonder why
Even without genetics, it was clear that the Samaritans and Palestinians were descendants of the ancient Israelites.
The populations of the Levant, Muslims, Christians, Druze, Samaritans and Alawites, generally look like each other physically, with regional differences ( syrians of Aleppo are different from a Palestinian from the south of palestine. They share the same culture. Israelis, even Mizrahi, do not look like Palestinians except for the rare Levantines and Iraqi Jews (and then again) so not even talking about the Ashkenazim who are the majority of the Jewish people.
On the other hand, I agree that genetics is not identity. The problem is not that AN extremely genetically diverse populations can see themselves as a single people with the same origin but that this assertion seeks to erase the indigenous people. Israelis do not accept the fact that it is a country born from colonization and then immigration. For this they are trying to deny the Palestinians a truth which says that they are indeed indigenous. The Palestinians on the other side are so steeped in Arab nationalism that they have never collectively sought to tell their real story and not the myth that would make them Arabs of Arabia.
I am North African, I am Arab but I know that my ancestors 1400 years ago spoke Amazigh. I know that my Arabness is an identity and not a genetic one. Genetically I am a North African from the northeast of Algeria.
But at the end of the day i hope that palestinians and israelis leave in peace !
The majority of Jews in Israel are not ashkenazi. Less than 1/3 are Ashkenaz. Palestinians are all from surrounding nations who colonized the area, with some exceptions obviously.
@@micahasher7600 Nah, genetics now prove much of the Palestinians are natives, but Arabized like the Samaritans were too but still kept their heritage. Genetics also show much of the zionist colonizers from europe are mixed with people from countries surrounding Palestine and in europe and in central Asia.
You're so misinformed it's tragic. Palestinians carry very little actual Arab DNA & are in fact closer to the Israelites than most Jews genetically, they are descendants of canaanites/israelites. Whilst the population of Israel is mostly non ashkenazi they were the founders of Zionism which turned Palestinians into refugees on their own land. The state of Israel was created and run by Ashkenazis before conglomerating Jews from around the world a lot of whom received racism from them when they arrived. The founders referred to it as a settler colonial state so you tell me.@@micahasher7600
@@micahasher7600 Most of jews IN THE WORLD are Ashkenazis.
But even without that. The Jews of Yemen; from Ethiopia, North Africa, Iran from the caucasus are not Levantines neither genetically nor anything at all.
Genetics today proves your claims to be false. Palestinians are related to ancient people from palestine not 90% of israelis. It doesn(t change anything because israelis exist today and palestinians and israelis have to find peace.
Furthermore, people have to be damn stupid to believe that Palestine (haifa, nazareth, jerusalem, hebron, jenine, lod, gaza,) was uninhabited before the arrival of the first Zionist settlers. It's so ridiculous that it amazes me that Israelis can believe it.
@@gohanbernard I won't play this game, but I got a good hand of cards as a Palestinian Christian Aramaic speaker haha I just learned today the close affinity we have with Samaritans.
Very well done. One thing to keep in mind though is that although the ancient Israelites do descend from the Canaanites, not all Canaanites were ancient Israelites especially keeping in mind that they were the enemies of the Israelites of that era. So matching with Canaanite ancestry can show that you likely descend from the Canaanites, they could very well be the Canaanites that didn't split off at the schism into Judaism and you have no ancient Israelite ancestry. Another thing to keep in mind is that many of the ancient Israelites come from different countries and areas of the world so not all of them are local Canaanites. A good percentage of the main biblical characters are from countries other than Israel/Canaan such as Saul from Tarshis Turkey, Timothey from Lystra Turkey, Abraham from Ur Iraq, Barnabas from Cyprus and many others.
Abraham and many of the others came from Syria (Urkesh )
Israelite was simply a name from Hurrians ...and they have been ended from people of Mount Seir 3 000 years ago
I have never heard that one before, Ill research into it. From the Torah narrative Abraham is from Ur, Iraq which is where the Code of Ur-Nammu was created which is what inspired the ten commandments in Judaism even. It wouldn't make sense for them to have ended 3000 years ago when we know that the Romans controlled Israel in the 2nd century AD so they clearly existed at that time.@@sokopic
@@EvaLasta schasu did take the name but the Y chromosomes from Jordania did replace the old Hurrian lineages
ur did fall to Chaldeans only 1000 years after abraham
in Abraham's time Amorrite did hold it ( Syrians like Abraham) but from all we know Abraham was the son of Amorite governor of Urkesh named Terru
even early Schasu like Jeremiah claimed the Habiru of Canaan descended from a Hittite mother and an Aramean father.
That is a fact only his people are not that Habiru
Nice to hear Age of Mythology music
duuude that game was the Bees knees..i knew that was a familiar sound.
thanks for the Nostalgia.😂
Note that Y-DNA hplogroup E1b1 is African in origin and over 80% of Africans carry it. People who carry it today that don't look African are mixed. The Natufians carried Y-DNA hplogroup E1b1. The Natufians did NOT have the A111T mutation in the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 gene that caused pale skin in Middle Easterners and other West Eurasian populations. Proving they were purely African genetically and phenotypically.
Haplogroup J, on the other hand originate from the Caucasus mountain and made their way into the the Middle East, hence bringing the gene for light skin.
😂 What do you gain from lying? Ydna is 1% of your dna makeup
@@shafsteryellow Y-DNA is 1% of our DNA, but that 1% encodes our paternal lineage and is passed on from male to male infinitely, irrespective of current phenotype. Y-DNA is the genetic surname of an individual. That means the first male(or clan) that carried E1b1 thousands of years ago have not gone one generation without giving birth to a male. So, that 1% of DNA is probably the most important since it NEVER change, even with admixing. That 1% takes away the mystery out of one's origin. Example, both Einstein and Hitlar carried E1b1, so we know what race or people fathered their father. They may look white but we know they were fathered by Africans.
E1b1b is North African/Levantine and is found among the main Jewish communities at frequencies ranging between 15% to 30%. Same thing among Lebanese and Arameans.
The other two main Y-DNA haplogrups among Jews, Samaritans, Lebanese and Arameans are J1 and J2.
@@YehudaLion it's found highest in Somalis bud
It is from an East African lineage, do not appropriate this, Africa is not a unit, it has different people and genetic flows.
Palestinians in the south are largely descendants of Bedouin tribes, and a significant portion of Gazans as well. Well the rest are pretty much descended of local Levantines who converted to Islam and Christianity. The Negev area was very much like Jordan a very Bedouin area connected to the Arabian peninsula
This has been explained in the previous video about Palestinian genetics
That’s not true. Southern Palestinians are predominantly Canaanite ancestry, there is just more southern ancestry in them than Palestinians in the north. But that southern ancestry is not necessarily in the form of direct ancestry from Bedouin tribes in the last 1400 years. If you break down the components in the two Iron Age samples in this video (as I have done), the one from Megiddo has more of a southern type bedoin-like component in it than the one from Abel Beth Maacah. It could be that southern Palestinians have more of this type of Iron Age ancestry. Of course, some may have Arabian admixture or Egyptian admixture, but I wouldn’t necessarily chalk it up to that when more tests would have to be done to see if they score enough of the more southerly Iron Age sample type DNA. He used Samaritans as a reference population for an admixture analysis in this video, he didn’t use either of the Iron Age samples for that purpose so tests would need to be done to find out.
You need to understand many Arabs also migrated to the land including the north and intermixed with the native populations which is why modern Muslim Palestinians have native DNA is their genome also
@@xplicitgoofy1015 Palestinians, including Muslim Palestinians, predominantly descend from the native people of the land. Arabian DNA is not very high in Palestinian Muslims. There may be at least some Arabian admixture in Palestinian Muslims, but the native ancestry of the land still predominates enormously as is depicted in this video.
@@IslenoGutierrez same could be said for Jews yet you love to ignore their DNA findings and focus on other aspects. Palestinians have a DNA mixture that causes them to have an Arab-Levantine DNA admixture that’s what’s evident in the video
A video about the samatarians would be great
How genetically related is the christian Lebanese community to Samaritan community? Thanks
The Samaritan Kohanim are E1b1 vs the J-P58 CMH.
E1b1 DNA (Both E1b1a and E1b1b) is NAUTIFIAN
Your off by about 20,000 years
@@shafsteryellowhe mentioned Natufian as the make up of Israelites
@@shafsteryellow Not at all. Natufians are the Proto-Semites.
The Samaritan Kohanim belongs to a down subclade of YDNA E-V22, which is E-FT161981. Not just simply E1b1.E1b1a has absolutely nothing to do with NATUFIAN. The Natufian culture belonged to E1b1b.
@Biblical_DNA Background on the E1b1a Haplogroup:
A haplogroup is a group of alleles inherited from a single parent (i.e. either the mother or the father). E1b1a (also known as E-M2) forms part of the E-V38 haplogroup found on the human Y chromosome - making it a paternally inherited clade.
Remains found in modern day Israel were analysed and confirmed to carry this haplogroup, dating as far back as the Natufian culture - a peoples living in the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean area of Western Asia) some 14000 years ago.
Present day, the E1b1a clade is predominantly found in Western Africa, followed by Central and Southern Africa. It has also been found, to a lesser extent in Northern Africa and the Middle East. It is also present in modern populations of Mizrahi Jews, Palestinians, Druze, and Bedouins - all whom have ancestral ties to ancient Israelites.
Human DNA goes back at least 2 million years. The last 15,000-20,000 years are merely a drop in the bucket. Less history and more anthropology would be great. Thanks
What do you think about the origins of Jews with haplogroup g-m201?
When you mentioned Aron , is that scientific ? And who did you know who the Ubaidians were
And here are my ancient scaled Global25 5 population results. Again I'm 100% Ashkenazi and am 41% Israelite (Late Bronze Age Ashkelon). You can see that it is the exact same percentage of Samaritan Israelite that I get (see previous comment):
Target: JoshuaMarks_scaled
Distance: 1.0350% / 0.01035010 | R5P
41.0 Israel_Ashkelon_LBA
27.2 Spain_Hellenistic_oMixed
18.0 Hungary_SouthTransdanubia_Eavar_2
11.6 BosniaHerzegovina_Medieval
2.2 PuertoRico_PasodelIndio_Ceramic_o
what is the Puerto Rican from?
Prophet Ibrahim is of Chaldean origin, and they are a people who migrated from the Al-Ula region in the northwest of the current state of Saudi Arabia 4,500 years ago due to drought and desertification to Mesopotamia, Iraq and Syria today. He moved to the Levant and Palestine or the land of Canaan, and he married his cousin Sarah. Then from Hagar, the mother of Ismail, who lived in Mecca while his brother Isaac remained in Palestine. During the era of the Prophet Joseph, they moved to Egypt and remained there for approximately 430 years. The Children of Israel intermarried with the peoples who lived among them, and then after leaving Egypt and the wanderings, they lived around the area of Palestine. Until they invaded it and established a state, and then came the Babylonian invasion, after which they spread throughout the region and the world... and with regard to the Jews of the Arab region, including the Samra sect, they are distributed in several regions (Jews around the world are a mixture of multiple races and nationalities and are not pure in race)... and of course Some of them converted to Christianity, and some of them became Muslims. There are Palestinian families of Jewish origins, such as the Dweik, Rajoub, and others. The controversy surrounding the Jews in this time is a deception and exploitation of the Jewish religion and Jews around the world for the sake of an expansionist colonial project in the Arab region. The world to control and dominate energy sources, trade routes and influence
What happened to the discord server?
Amorites are mentioned in the old testament. Joshua 10:12- Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel:
“Sun, stand still over Gibeon;
And Moon, in the Valley of Aijalon.”
He skipped the entire 430 years in Africa where they go in 70 souls and come out a nation
Psalms 105:23
“Israel also came into Egypt; and Jacob sojourned in the land of Ham.”
Psalms 105:24
“And he increased his people greatly; and made them stronger than their enemies.”
Bible isnt fact dont use it like fact. Its stories that were written 300 years after any of the events.
Jacob lived in Egypt seventeen years, and the years of his life were a hundred and forty-seven. 29 When the time drew near for Israel to die, he called for his son Joseph and said to him, “If I have found favor in your eyes, put your hand under my thigh and promise that you will show me kindness and faithfulness. Genesis 47:28 ...Yes Jacob went to Egypt that doesn't mean he was an African. Jacob and Esau was twins....Esau had Red hair...how can Jacob be African ???
@cgwebbers8655 I didn't say he was but the 600,000 that came 430 years later mixed with Africans such as Joseph and his 2 children and Moses with the cushite
@cgwebbers8655 my point was, out of bias he skipped over the most pivotal part in early Israelite history
The historicity of the Exodus is dubious at best, so it makes sense that it was left out.
Very comprehensive, thank you. It does not come as any surprise there was only two samples of Israelite dna to work with. Israel is s closed book when it comes to this aspect of things. In fact its illegal to do a dna test in Israel without a court order, and of which one must have a very specific reason.
Not the only country where genetic tests are forbidden unless required by a Court.
He’s sampling ancient DNA samples. The other narrative that many often forget is that the Israelite tribes were not the first people in the land
@@user-zo4mk9iv8c
The only country in the Middle East. Nice try bubba.
That’s what it is we are all intertwined as a HumanRace.
So we should show respect to humanity.
And act accordingly!
Someone, educate me on the hebrew geneology tables, as is known by the accepted teaching, in kindness what sources?
The sample size for bronze age Israelites is two and they don't match and they are poor quailty. They are not compared to contemporary Samaritans, only modern. And Samaritans have had 2,000+ years to become homogeneous. Therefore they are the same as bronze age Israelites? What is the margin for error? 50%? 100%?
In what way were the samples they poor quality and how would that effect the results? They were able to derive genetic data enough produce tangible results. Furthermore, those results makes sense, especially, considering the fact that Palestinians and Samaritans inhabit the very country for whose ancient inhabitants they are being compared to. It makes sense they would have a high amount of genetic affinity. Btw it also shows Jewish populations having varying levels of affinity with the Israelites and Samaritans.
Why didn't they use iron age Israelite DNA? There is more of it and it is higher quality. And they would not have to substitute Samaritan DNA for it. And why did they not test Canaanite or Philistine iron age DNA to see how that population changed? So we have a sample size too small to tell an outlier from typical. Why does it matter? The narrator of the video chose his words carefully. I will too. @@jawadmaniaci91
I take serious issue with using the Samaritans as place holders for the ancient Israelite population. This is because despite being endogenous it is almost certain that there much have been some intermarriage with non Samaritan populations as did happen with Jews. tis not to say that Palestinians aren’t indigenous or descendants of Israelites but it makes Jews look less indigenous than they are. The genetic closeness charts for the ancient Israelite population are available on Illustrativedna and the order of relatedness to the population is roughly 1. Lebanese Christian 2. Palestinian/Jordanian Christian 3. Lebanese Shia. 4. Mizrahi Jews 5. Palestinian Muslims. 6. Ashkenaz. Utilizing the Samaritan as a place holder despite them still being relatively far from the ancient Israelites, makes Mizrahim look not related at all to ancient Israelites.
The Jews in the colonial state of Israel are not indigenous just accept that
The resistance have the right to take the land back
Exactly. It was a big oversight not to point that out. Also, he fails to mention that both ancient samples come from the north (Abel Beth Maacah and Megiddo), which were part of ancient Israel, not Judah-the actual place of origin of Jews. I understand the practicality and convenience in presenting the facts this way, given the limited available samples and the absence of samples from Judah. However, he should have waited for new samples before making such claims or been clearer with what he was presenting. It's a shame, since it's a very interesting topic to say the least.
@@yaseensharawi8034they can't even figure out how to govern the land they have. Maybe they should just all live with Ismail Haniyyeh and Khaled Meshaal in the Palestinian state of Qatar. Or any of the other nearby states they tried to take over and ruined.
@@yaseensharawi8034ask the Samaritans how they'd feel about that.
@@jaialaiwarrior the smarten from the first day say that the state of Israel is a colonial un lagtment state
And the say the Jews are ifidal who changed their holy book
thank you thank you
Great video 👍
This is just an additional layer onto what i've already read about in many books: The Palestinians that remained on the land retained a far higher ancestral heritage to ancient Israelites than the Colonizing Ashkenazi Jews that use Zionism as a political tool to dispossess the Indigenous Palestinians.
Video just showed that they're both related to the israelites. And you still wanna promote your racism, not funny.
Both the palestinians and the Jews are mixed, so stop being racist.
Don't make this about white colonizers though. Most of the Christian Palestinians, and northern ones are very white, even some with blonde hair and blue eyes.
@@aag3752 Palestinians are a significantly mixed heritage no doubt, with a degree of ancient european ancestry.
However the Zionist State of Israel is not just about twisting the narratives about ancient ancestry and the judaic religion, it is also in significant part about whiteness, as it was allowed to exist as an extension of Colonialism from European Powers, who rigged the UN heavily to allow for Israel to exist on a land already occupied by an indigenous population, which directly violated the UN's very own foundational human rights charter.
People from European Countries who have no Jewish ancestry can convert to Judaism and be recognized under the 'right to return' law in Israel and granted "israeli citizenship. In a bid to appear multi-cultural, Israel offered this to Ethiopian refugees as well, under the condition that they undergo a "voluntary sterilization" procedure. As a result, only 70% of Israeli Citizens were born in Israel, and of the immigrant-citizens the overwhelming majority of them are white immigrants from the US and Europe. Israel has very specific ethnic laws in place to ensure the "right of return" convert-immigrants are overwhelmingly white.
@@aag3752yes but the Zionist colonial project is a part of European Settler Colonialism, and must be distinguished as such in the context of the modern political environment. It’s not about “color” as much as it is about colonialism in general, and specifically the European Settler Colonialism of the Ashkenazi led Zionist movement, a group made mostly of European ancestry and therefore the least similar to the genetic line in question.
the real problem is not about the genetic at all
Yes Its about identity.
Hi Ali, love your work! Just wondering- do you still run your course on interpretation?
Well done!! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Hey Man, can you start doing the Far East? Thailand, Japan, Indonesia, vietnam etc.
Average Gazans hold 64% Samaritan like DNA which is still huze percentage 😥
This is same descendants of Israelites were get labelled as animals by "Israeli"
Show a peer-reviewed study that shows that Gazans have 64% of Samaritan DNA?
@@shainazion4073 This exact number is showed in this video at 9.19s You can check this
That is ONE Palestinian, not a study on Palestinians. Most Palestinians are not even from Palestine. They are Muslim refugees invited into the land by the Ottomans from Europe and Africa. Bosniaks, Circassians, Chechins and Sudanese are not Palestinians!!! The majority are Arab Levantine laborers that came into the land as support personnel for the British in the 1900s, and because of the prosperity brought by the Jews reclaiming the land. Egyptians, Syrians, Jordanians, Iraqis and Lebanese are not Palestinians!!!!
The Palestinians are a political identity, not an ethnicity, nor a nationality. They were invented in 1964 by the KGB and PLO to stop the success of the Jewish state. The "Palestinian" Christians have different DNA than the Palestinian Muslims, the Palestinians in the West Bank have different DNA than the Palestinians in Gaza. There is no Palestinian profile of DNA. Only the families that are known to have lived in the land for generations are related to the ancient Jews, Israelites and Hebrews.
As for his samples in this video, if you actually knew history, there were over 1 million Samaritans that were forced to convert to Islam in the last few hundred years. The population in the entire land in 1860 was only 350,000 people.
@@shainazion4073the video sources from this DNA he most reliable. FUCK YOU😂
I always knew the Palestinians were the descendants of the ancient Israelites! I have always said this to be the case. Great video! Very well presented
and the jews, dont forget. the jews didnt become arabs like the palestinians did
Israelites never exited
The early zionists also believed this, they wanted to offer Palestinians to convert back to Judaism. But the non-Jewish Palestinians didn't do it as I understand.
@@PodcastCentral333 You missed the point so thoroughly.
????@@E2Dima
Impressing..!
Interesting
Nice video. Still three questions are raised:
1. can we really base all this research on two DNA samples claimed to trace back to "Israelites"?
2. It would be more interesting to find the shared father (y chromosome of Abraham) to all of Israelites.
3. Your video on the Palestinian DNA failed to mention this relation to the sample DNA found in Israel and considered Israelite (if my memory serves me right), and I wonder why!
I’m not sure what you are implying. There’s at least 19 ancient Canaanite recovered body samples that are used to determine ancient Israelite DNA in most of these Levant tests, and they also say pretty much the same thing as he does even if he’s just using two for his studies. He does a good job of explaining his methodology for using Samaritans, because the Samaritans are closely related to those samples.
It's because this is part of the agenda to falsely claim Palestinians are the real Jews. This video is cherry-picked smoke and mirrors to serve an ideological purpose. You can go find the actual genetic studies which are linked from wikipedia. Palestinians are genetically halfway between Saudi Arabs and Egyptian Arabs, which is what you would expect. Druze and Samaritans are very close to Jews, which is also what you expect. Palestinians were literally calling themselves Arabs before 1964 when they magically discovered they were a separate ethnic group. All their last names tell the truth, as Arabic last names are place names. And all the so-called Palestinians have last names that translate to "the Egytian" "the Syrian" "the Saudi" etc. You can look that up too.
@@glrendon81
I am not implying anything, I am asking objective legitimate questions and suggesting in interesting perspective (at least for me).
The creator of the video is clearly knowledgeable and knows the material very well; but he also base this video on two fossils (unless I misunderstand, he never mentioned the other 19 you say were found!). Hence my first question.
My second question relates to the historical/Biblical claims of a shared father to all Israelites (and BTW Arabs on the Jordanian - at least - side if we want to follow the Biblical story correctly, at least from the father's side). So to me it would be interesting to find out if there is a common y chromosome trace - and by all means, I am not an expert or even very knowledgeable in the field , I am assuming it should be traceable theoretically!
As for my third remark, one would assume that research would be consistent. And while the creator of this video have already created several phenomenal videos on the Israelites, Palestinians (historical and current populations), and Canaanites, it seems to me that the conclusion vary from one video to another. Hence, I wonder why (objectively)!
One final remark to clarify things, @Ancestralbrew, I really appreciate your videos and for giving me the chance to learn.
@@elibadran956 OK. I watched the Palestinian video too and didn’t see where it contradicted this one so I didn’t understand. To me, the point of this video is different than that one. To me, that video was specifically about the genetic origins of Palestinians. This video is more about how related modern groups are to Israelites.
There are not many ancient samples to use. While we have more than a dozen ancient Canaanite samples, to determine that one is Israelite, I am guessing they would have to date it to a specific time in a specific part of the Levant. There just might not be that many samples to pull from.
@@glrendon81
It could be only a matter of presentation. And I assume that it would be impossible to put politics and religion aside in the sake of science over a social platform such as RUclips, especially in light of what happening now and the claim that a certain high power gave certain people "certain privileges"... (And I am a Christian, most probably share the DNA mentioned in the video just under the Samaritans ... and sorry for the touch of sarcasm).
For example @2:46 in "THE GENETIC ORIGINS OF THE PALESTINIANS" video (linked at the end) the data is very similar to the data presented here, however, the fairly intriguing fact that the Palestinian Christian and Samaritans share the DNA to those exact "Two Israelites" was not mentioned. It was actually included in "Canaanite package." I am not sure how many people understand the implications of such scientific narrative on the geo-political-religgious narratives; but these are bombshells on many levels.
I would definitely understand how the author of the video is walking on eggshells here, but the dots are all there, if the science is correct (which I assume it is) that would be very intriguing so why not simply put it out there scientifically and objectively.
Still, I would love to see my remarks taken into account in the next video (note #2 would be fascinating to watch) - a humble request nothing more. :)
ruclips.net/video/bCn6v8X0Ebk/видео.htmlsi=XqhmmptapTRYAiEW&t=166
80-to-90% of world Jews are Ashkenazis who came from Europe. The Torah (Genesis 10:3) says they descend from Gomer and Japheth but NOT from Shem. Ashkenazis are NOT even Semites according to the Torah.
Absolutely like satan- yahoo his family is polish with polish surname