And that is so shameful from ED, not really doing anything properly in the time they are working for it. Like when they created AGR mode, they couldn't make it to detect trees, so you would get radar shadows from trees and all. And GMT mode is just like nothing else is there than the vehicles, so pure cheat to read the unit ID from the radar scan area and mark it on radar. While in reality when vehicles start to camouflage, they become even invisible to radar as for FLIR, you just make them vanish from those. That is why european warfare is completely different from the desert operations as you can't use radar or targeting pod to detect troops locations or movements, but you need to have recon troops on the ground to do visual spotting for coordinates.
Great tutorial and explanation regarding the process and limitations. HRM is what I am looking forward to most. Janes did an awesome job with it 25 years ago so expectations are very high 😊
Love the targeting pod pixelation! I'm really glad we're getting an SE at EA that will be similar-ish to ODS-era. Some low-level, no GPS strikes will be awesome! Thanks!
fascinating, so i presume this confirms it does not have a gmt track mode then? kind of a shame but it really doesnt make much of a difference to my use of the plane anyway
Also my main question is. Will the backseat AI be able to use the radar and lock targets itself? I don't mean it just does it of course, you'll have to use the dialogue wheel, but will you be able to have him find and track targets?
is the FAQ document that was uploaded have a correct estimate of time till release as it was posted 10th march and said 2 weeks from viewing this document
Coming from the Hornet and Viper (single player), I'm wondering if I'll be effective enough in the Strike Eagle to really enjoy it as a single player. I'm just starting to get decent in the Viper, which is why I'm a little on the fence about getting the F-15E. She's definitely caught my eye though 😉
me too..if u have the 18 and 16 for ground and air roles probably ..may be u don't need this one...(USP of this f15 is the twin seater) but that u can go for in the f14 and enjoy more since it is not fly by wire it is more fly worth and manual efforts needs to be put(like Tom cruise) giving u the feeling of actually dogfigting ... u can wait for the Vietnam era jets(Phantom) ..definely there would b e jungle maps coming for it with rivers and assault boats .. that would be fun and u can but the mig farmer mig 19(just 24 dollars on a sale) and use it combat one against another.. and enjoy the low level flight dogfighting and enjoy scenry and setting up ambushes and Napalm and other ordnance that is sweaty and muscle flexing...
@@chronichurdle1802 the EX version is defintely fly by wire but I saw some videos where the latest production of the F15 E version itself has been adapted to FBW
Hey mate, looking great! Just wondering, does the 15E have something similar as the "INT" mode that the Hornet has? INT mode will basically show terrain on 1 sweep of the radar, and then show no terrain on the other. Found it very useful to get a quick reference of what you are looking at, for example, roads, buildings, mountains etc. Thanks dude (My bad, should have watched until the end! The strike Eagle does have this capability)
Also i guess, ed screwed something up to implement the f15 strike eagle for dcs...no Information whats the problem no communication about a next release date. Bin-mt was definitely important as primary point to develope, in my opinion ed should stop all features etc, put them on hold, just maintain optimization & synchronization of hardware usage, focus on dlss/ fsr 2.0, multicore and threads and then after completing this. Then just priorize to fix bugs, and after the second step, there is time to implement & develope new features, systems, planes etc...they always promise way too much and so many things at the same time...they are not able for delivery without disappointments by us virtual pilots
I will wait for the Phantom and not go for F15..if u have the 18 and 16 for ground and air roles probably ..may be u don't need this one...(USP of this f15 is the twin seater) but that u can go for in the f14 and enjoy more since it is not fly by wire it is more fly worth and manual efforts needs to be put(like Tom cruise) giving u the feeling of actually dogfigting ... u can wait for the Vietnam era jets(Phantom) ..definitely there would b e jungle maps coming for it with rivers and assault boats .. that would be fun and u can but the mig farmer mig 19(just 24 dollars on a sale) and use it combat one against another.. and enjoy the low level flight dogfighting and enjoy scenry and setting up ambushes and Napalm and other ordnance that is sweaty and muscle flexing...
I wasnt impressed by the resolution of the pod... Hornets pod with same distance looks better. Is that the best resolution the pod provides even after release?
Sounds right, the LANTRIN is an older system (~87') compared to the LITENING (~99') and of course the ATFLIR.(~03') I am not sure about any potential upgrades it may have had around 2003.
Lantirn is a lower res pod, in future updates the F-15 will receive a newer pod but at EA release we get the lantirn similar to how the real life strike eagle was initially deployed
@@spudmajic boy I sure hope so. I respect that the LANTIRN pod is a pretty faithful representation to the original but this thing is almost unusable at anything >6 miles
@@AWaifuInVR the interesting thing to me is how similar it looks to the janes f15e sim back from 98. i thought it was because of the graphics engine at the time, but apparently its not far off from reality either.
I'm going to have to side with the majority here. Giving us a 05+ Strike eagle with an 87 era pod is pretty crap. 80 dollars for a module that uses obsolete tech when there are multiple pods in the game already. Sniper Pod coming later means that you give an eagle that is missing what makes it a strike eagle for probably another 4-5 years. That sniper pod is nowhere near being released for any module. We aren't buying an 87 era eagle we are buying an 05+ eagle so where is that tech.
what majority? I like the idea of having the older pod, and then getting two more later. Besides, more challenge to use. you bummed about not having jdams too? For ODS scenarios this will be sweet!
what are you guys coming from? ffs. They are giving 3 pods within the module, which is gonna be launched in Early Access. Just give them some time to complete the full roadmap once it's released... sigh
I say this as a long time DCS player. It takes years to flesh out a pod. HB has there Lantrin, now Raz has there Lantrin. Promises of Sniper has been almost 4 years now not one word said from ED on it. I can appreciate those who like using the older pods and doing it the old fashioned way that is fun to. However and I say this from the heart. Selling a module with the promise of future content is getting quite old at this point. F15E was promised 10+ years ago to and it took till now to get it. After release of a module things get really slow on the development side of things. Paying that money while yes gives you years of upgrades is paying for the promise of other features. Technically once it's released they can change there mind and not deliver one thing more. ED Scrapped the sniper pod on the viper for awhile to until the community exploded on them to get it back on the list. I like to think Razbam is a good enough company to keep there word but this day and age it's getting harder to trust in that.
My guy it helps me learn. My brain is going uhh when i watch these videos so it helps me to relate. Also get checked out if you can't pay attention to the video because of counting something that all normal human beings dont even notice.
Игры
nice to see civ traffic actually shown on GMT, unlike the hornet...!
And that is so shameful from ED, not really doing anything properly in the time they are working for it. Like when they created AGR mode, they couldn't make it to detect trees, so you would get radar shadows from trees and all.
And GMT mode is just like nothing else is there than the vehicles, so pure cheat to read the unit ID from the radar scan area and mark it on radar. While in reality when vehicles start to camouflage, they become even invisible to radar as for FLIR, you just make them vanish from those. That is why european warfare is completely different from the desert operations as you can't use radar or targeting pod to detect troops locations or movements, but you need to have recon troops on the ground to do visual spotting for coordinates.
Great tutorial and explanation regarding the process and limitations. HRM is what I am looking forward to most. Janes did an awesome job with it 25 years ago so expectations are very high 😊
Time for another GREAT lesson ! thank you Notso.
Looking great lads.
Can’t wait for this thing to come out! Looks so good!
i cant wait anymore. Jane's vibees
Although this tutorial series might be a little "tease" for the impatient, it helps a lot to be prepared when the Eagle will actually drop. Thank you.
thanks again rabam!
Love the targeting pod pixelation! I'm really glad we're getting an SE at EA that will be similar-ish to ODS-era. Some low-level, no GPS strikes will be awesome! Thanks!
What is stopping you for not using GPS guided weapons when they're available what kind of logic is this?
@@Rlaxox not GPS weapons, but EGI. Having to do a correct PVU before making a patch map and making sure the INS is tight will be awesome.
cold start!!!!!
So the F-15E radar is being modeled but thr F-14D radar which is based on the F-15E radar can't be modeled.
Damn. Razbam's radar simulation is simply unmatched! 😮
heatblur>>
Deka...
fascinating, so i presume this confirms it does not have a gmt track mode then? kind of a shame but it really doesnt make much of a difference to my use of the plane anyway
Hi,
Question for the GMT radar of the F-15E.
It works by Dopler or by image comparison?
How do I move the antenna in the front seat?
Anyone know if we will be able to use the AGM-158 JASSM?
This means the next tutorial will finally get into employing weapons.
Also my main question is. Will the backseat AI be able to use the radar and lock targets itself? I don't mean it just does it of course, you'll have to use the dialogue wheel, but will you be able to have him find and track targets?
is the FAQ document that was uploaded have a correct estimate of time till release as it was posted 10th march and said 2 weeks from viewing this document
Probably the standard DCS joke about two weeks. I wouldn't read into it.
man i cant wait to fly this machine.... I CANT WAAAAIIIIIITT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When is it available i can’t wait I already bought the preorder
what is the release date Razbaam
great video!! When is the f 15 e coming for dcs ?
What up with no steam pre orders?
Very cool, but when can i fly it?
litening pod is completely compatible with f15e, Is that an option on the RAZBAM sim as it is with the DCS f16?
the litening pod is coming later, lantirn pod first
Hope it comes soon, at the Lantirn pod sucks 🙂
Do I understand correctly that the Streagle can't do a GMT track like the Hornet can? :)
Yes.
Cool video because this guy makes it like a human and not like a chatbot reading out a dry Manuel like watt magner.
Please tell when you release the beast you launch a countdown without any count
Anyone else feel like we're just waiting for them to finish making videos?
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Coming from the Hornet and Viper (single player), I'm wondering if I'll be effective enough in the Strike Eagle to really enjoy it as a single player. I'm just starting to get decent in the Viper, which is why I'm a little on the fence about getting the F-15E. She's definitely caught my eye though 😉
me too..if u have the 18 and 16 for ground and air roles probably ..may be u don't need this one...(USP of this f15 is the twin seater) but that u can go for in the f14 and enjoy more since it is not fly by wire it is more fly worth and manual efforts needs to be put(like Tom cruise) giving u the feeling of actually dogfigting ... u can wait for the Vietnam era jets(Phantom) ..definely there would b e jungle maps coming for it with rivers and assault boats .. that would be fun and u can but the mig farmer mig 19(just 24 dollars on a sale) and use it combat one against another.. and enjoy the low level flight dogfighting and enjoy scenry and setting up ambushes and Napalm and other ordnance that is sweaty and muscle flexing...
@@UdemmyUdemmy F15 E interestingly isn't fly by wire. It's a pilots plane
@@chronichurdle1802 the EX version is defintely fly by wire but I saw some videos where the latest production of the F15 E version itself has been adapted to FBW
Whatever that means@@chronichurdle1802
Hey mate, looking great!
Just wondering, does the 15E have something similar as the "INT" mode that the Hornet has?
INT mode will basically show terrain on 1 sweep of the radar, and then show no terrain on the other.
Found it very useful to get a quick reference of what you are looking at, for example, roads, buildings, mountains etc.
Thanks dude
(My bad, should have watched until the end! The strike Eagle does have this capability)
16:15
How many videos before this thing gets released??
100
2 weeks worth
2 weeks of more videos
@@user-tw4fd4wu1gHow do you know?
Yes
Also i guess, ed screwed something up to implement the f15 strike eagle for dcs...no Information whats the problem no communication about a next release date. Bin-mt was definitely important as primary point to develope, in my opinion ed should stop all features etc, put them on hold, just maintain optimization & synchronization of hardware usage, focus on dlss/ fsr 2.0, multicore and threads and then after completing this. Then just priorize to fix bugs, and after the second step, there is time to implement & develope new features, systems, planes etc...they always promise way too much and so many things at the same time...they are not able for delivery without disappointments by us virtual pilots
if only mudhen crews had "active pause" at their fingertips, "active pause" has ruined my multi tasking in DCS....lol
GIVE IT TO ME NOW I NEED IT NOW PLEASE RAZBAM OH MY GOD I NEED IT OH LORD
I will wait for the Phantom and not go for F15..if u have the 18 and 16 for ground and air roles probably ..may be u don't need this one...(USP of this f15 is the twin seater) but that u can go for in the f14 and enjoy more since it is not fly by wire it is more fly worth and manual efforts needs to be put(like Tom cruise) giving u the feeling of actually dogfigting ... u can wait for the Vietnam era jets(Phantom) ..definitely there would b e jungle maps coming for it with rivers and assault boats .. that would be fun and u can but the mig farmer mig 19(just 24 dollars on a sale) and use it combat one against another.. and enjoy the low level flight dogfighting and enjoy scenry and setting up ambushes and Napalm and other ordnance that is sweaty and muscle flexing...
Fun fact, the F-15E we're getting is not Fly-by-Wire. But i get the point in having the 16 and 18 not needing this necessarily
@@SebastianBdrums if that is the case then it could be a nice prospect to have in ur inventory
I wasnt impressed by the resolution of the pod... Hornets pod with same distance looks better. Is that the best resolution the pod provides even after release?
Sounds right, the LANTRIN is an older system (~87') compared to the LITENING (~99') and of course the ATFLIR.(~03')
I am not sure about any potential upgrades it may have had around 2003.
Lantirn is a lower res pod, in future updates the F-15 will receive a newer pod but at EA release we get the lantirn similar to how the real life strike eagle was initially deployed
The F-15E will get the sniper pod later on
This is the LANTIRN pod, the oldest of the 3 that we will get. This is a similar pod to the one on the tomcat
If I remember correctly, PTID-equipped F-14s used to lase for Strike Eagles because they got a clearer image/more zoom. It’s older technology, indeed.
Compared to the Super hornets or F-35A AESA radars this is old tech.
Horrible res on that pod. . Thanks for the video.
yea, thats becasue its not a lightning pod.
First
Ah jk it's cool but money is what I want so I can get a few games lol
Beanz
that tpod is borderline unusable lol.
the hrm is essentially the targeting pod. the pod just give you a laser for lgbs. lol
@@spudmajic boy I sure hope so. I respect that the LANTIRN pod is a pretty faithful representation to the original but this thing is almost unusable at anything >6 miles
I guess correlating between GMT, SAR and hrm is a skillset all in it's own though.
@@AWaifuInVR the interesting thing to me is how similar it looks to the janes f15e sim back from 98. i thought it was because of the graphics engine at the time, but apparently its not far off from reality either.
I'm going to have to side with the majority here. Giving us a 05+ Strike eagle with an 87 era pod is pretty crap. 80 dollars for a module that uses obsolete tech when there are multiple pods in the game already. Sniper Pod coming later means that you give an eagle that is missing what makes it a strike eagle for probably another 4-5 years. That sniper pod is nowhere near being released for any module. We aren't buying an 87 era eagle we are buying an 05+ eagle so where is that tech.
what majority? I like the idea of having the older pod, and then getting two more later. Besides, more challenge to use. you bummed about not having jdams too? For ODS scenarios this will be sweet!
Except LANTIRN tgp was the main pod of the strike eagles till the sniper pod came. Litening wasn't really a thing for strike eagles.
what are you guys coming from? ffs. They are giving 3 pods within the module, which is gonna be launched in Early Access.
Just give them some time to complete the full roadmap once it's released... sigh
I say this as a long time DCS player. It takes years to flesh out a pod. HB has there Lantrin, now Raz has there Lantrin. Promises of Sniper has been almost 4 years now not one word said from ED on it. I can appreciate those who like using the older pods and doing it the old fashioned way that is fun to. However and I say this from the heart. Selling a module with the promise of future content is getting quite old at this point. F15E was promised 10+ years ago to and it took till now to get it. After release of a module things get really slow on the development side of things. Paying that money while yes gives you years of upgrades is paying for the promise of other features. Technically once it's released they can change there mind and not deliver one thing more. ED Scrapped the sniper pod on the viper for awhile to until the community exploded on them to get it back on the list. I like to think Razbam is a good enough company to keep there word but this day and age it's getting harder to trust in that.
@@zeroxzero8348 DCS in 2012 could not support the strike eagle. Hence why it only started again in like 2019ish
There are at least 24 "uhh"s between 0:15 and 1:15 - extrapolated out to 19 minutes, that's 450 "uhhs" in the video. Please do better.
My guy it helps me learn. My brain is going uhh when i watch these videos so it helps me to relate. Also get checked out if you can't pay attention to the video because of counting something that all normal human beings dont even notice.
You're getting tutorial videos from a retired F-15E WSO, he's already done better.
@@bullitthead7853 eexaactly
@@bullitthead7853 that dude can write the script and someone else can read it. That's fine. All the content with none of the 'uhs"
@@zachansen8293 How about you cope with it lmao. Aint nobody writing scripts for 10 minute DCS tutorial
ugh no one asking for these videos. RELEASE IT FGS
Bruh, simple, don’t watch.
No one asked for an incel to comment and yet here you are.
@@REDAC98 no asked for you to be born