It's an obvious & historically recognized fact that the misinterpretation or the erroneous defining of the amendments of the US Constitution, results in the destruction of the Constitution Indeed, for if practise is made of determining that any amendment contains a meaning which, in fact, is not contained anywhere within that amendment, then the amendment is made devoid of it's actual specific definition and is, therefor, reduced to being merely a cluster of words that can mean anything. In turn, a Constitution that means anything is equivalent to a non-existent Constitution...because it's been destroyed Now, on to the next step...because methodicalness is a good thing There once existed a particular American, of whom, no American today would be willing to be publically foolish enough to claim the possession of greater Constitutional authority. Therefor, John Adams explained to Americans something which can be used greatly for correctly interpreting & defining the US Constitution "Our Constitution was made for a religious and moral people, it is wholly inadequate to the government of any other" - John Adams Mine was an exceptional, tuition-free Jr. High School. It's diploma awarded me, enabled the rectification of great & controversial issues within my country "Separation" "Roe vs Wade" "Prop 8 overruled"...are now, all correctly, legally rectified "STUDENT LOANS" because you simply can't afford to be stupid ~ The Ape Hunter ~
You misunderstand John Adam's quote about a religious and moral people. He did not use "religious" and "moral" as synonyms. By "moral," he was referring to people like himself who had done the hard work of pondering what morality was (and is). To most of the Founding Fathers, natural law (and "Nature's God") was more Kant than Aquinas. Morality came from reasoning, not the Bible or contemplation of good and evil based on God's immutable standards. To the Founding Fathers, morality was the reverse of the Bible: "Do NOT do unto others what you WOULD NOT have them do unto you." They expected men like themselves -- principled -- to hold public office. Most people don't get around to considering what morality actually is. Instead they base their sense of right and wrong on religious prescriptions and proscriptions. The Founding Fathers recognized that, although the masses didn't fully grasp morality, the religiosity of the American people would be a decent stand-in for Americans to "form a more perfect Union" and "promote the general Welfare." Even early in the Republic, Americans were recognized as a religious people, and the Founding Fathers relied on that to preserve the nation. #TheReligiousWhite deploy Adam's quote to broadcast that THEY and Christianity have primacy because THEY are holding the nation together. The opposite is true, actually. They are still the religious from Adam's quote; today's secularists and atheists are Adam's heirs because they use reason, and do not rely on "God's law," to understand morality and moral decision-making.
"Four worst supreme court arguments on marriage" Ok, give me your argument for gay marriage. If its for equality, you have to explain why all other types of sexualities(including but not limited to pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, and being asexual) don't deserve it as well. You cannot use the "consent" argument because all 3 that require 2 parties can provide proper consent, we just dismiss it as they don't know what they're talking about, its not real consent, and they're delusional (in that order) as reasons why they can't have it. I am for marriage equality but people have to understand, you can't ask for a logical reason why something that is completely illogical already should not be passed. You're asking for a reason why someone's ideology is wrong. You're basically saying that science can't disprove god so god exists and its a completely unfair argument. Either let the states vote on it (democracy) or shut the hell up about it. This should be a state handled matter as it DOES NOT DEAL with equal rights. Not being able to be married DOES NOT prevent you from living your life like everyone else. You can hold the same positions of power, you can vote, and you can gain wealth as well as speak your mind.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
It's almost as though they aren't even TRYING to make a strong case... which may in fact be what's going on.
The Scarey part is Thomas & Scalia will agree with every lame defense each State gives.
I would not get over confident - arrogance can offend - work it right up to the wire
Trev S Losing is one thing. But to lose when the arguments are so poor would be salt in the wounds.
theuglykwan We think a little humidity helps win the peace
Thank u !
I live in Ohio so that one does not at all surprise me. Lot of great people. Let of right wing politicians.
I... wow....
It's an obvious & historically recognized fact that the misinterpretation or the erroneous defining of the amendments of the US Constitution, results in the destruction of the Constitution
Indeed, for if practise is made of determining that any amendment contains a meaning which, in fact, is not contained anywhere within that amendment, then the amendment is made devoid of it's actual specific definition and is, therefor, reduced to being merely a cluster of words that can mean anything. In turn, a Constitution that means anything is equivalent to a non-existent Constitution...because it's been destroyed
Now, on to the next step...because methodicalness is a good thing
There once existed a particular American, of whom, no American today would be willing to be publically foolish enough to claim the possession of greater Constitutional authority. Therefor, John Adams explained to Americans something which can be used greatly for correctly interpreting & defining the US Constitution
"Our Constitution was made for a religious and moral people, it is wholly inadequate to the government of any other"
- John Adams
Mine was an exceptional, tuition-free Jr. High School. It's diploma awarded me, enabled the rectification of great & controversial issues within my country
"Separation"
"Roe vs Wade"
"Prop 8 overruled"...are now, all correctly, legally rectified
"STUDENT LOANS"
because you simply can't afford to be stupid
~ The Ape Hunter ~
You misunderstand John Adam's quote about a religious and moral people.
He did not use "religious" and "moral" as synonyms. By "moral," he was referring to people like himself who had done the hard work of pondering what morality was (and is).
To most of the Founding Fathers, natural law (and "Nature's God") was more Kant than Aquinas. Morality came from reasoning, not the Bible or contemplation of good and evil based on God's immutable standards.
To the Founding Fathers, morality was the reverse of the Bible: "Do NOT do unto others what you WOULD NOT have them do unto you."
They expected men like themselves -- principled -- to hold public office.
Most people don't get around to considering what morality actually is. Instead they base their sense of right and wrong on religious prescriptions and proscriptions. The Founding Fathers recognized that, although the masses didn't fully grasp morality, the religiosity of the American people would be a decent stand-in for Americans to "form a more perfect Union" and "promote the general Welfare."
Even early in the Republic, Americans were recognized as a religious people, and the Founding Fathers relied on that to preserve the nation.
#TheReligiousWhite deploy Adam's quote to broadcast that THEY and Christianity have primacy because THEY are holding the nation together. The opposite is true, actually.
They are still the religious from Adam's quote; today's secularists and atheists are Adam's heirs because they use reason, and do not rely on "God's law," to understand morality and moral decision-making.
"Four worst supreme court arguments on marriage"
Ok, give me your argument for gay marriage. If its for equality, you have to explain why all other types of sexualities(including but not limited to pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy, and being asexual) don't deserve it as well. You cannot use the "consent" argument because all 3 that require 2 parties can provide proper consent, we just dismiss it as they don't know what they're talking about, its not real consent, and they're delusional (in that order) as reasons why they can't have it.
I am for marriage equality but people have to understand, you can't ask for a logical reason why something that is completely illogical already should not be passed.
You're asking for a reason why someone's ideology is wrong. You're basically saying that science can't disprove god so god exists and its a completely unfair argument. Either let the states vote on it (democracy) or shut the hell up about it. This should be a state handled matter as it DOES NOT DEAL with equal rights. Not being able to be married DOES NOT prevent you from living your life like everyone else. You can hold the same positions of power, you can vote, and you can gain wealth as well as speak your mind.