The non-giggles "And Your Bird Can Sing" outtake is actually on the Anthology DVD - they isolated the giggles to a channel separate from the music in 5.1, so I was able to record it clean and burn a cd 15+ years ago. Nice to know that it's getting wider release and on a cd finally. Not having the Atmos or 5.1 of the album in the boxed set this time is (IMO) a mistake.
I'd also heard the giggle-free version on some bootleg I have at home, I can't think of the name of the compilation, but I'm also glad it's out in the box set now, it'll be better mixed and engineered.
I know man. I was having a hard time waiting for its release and only hearing Taxman so far off the remix. I preordered the lp. So stoked for the mono versions.
Me too - I just hope I got the cash for it on the 28th 😄😄😄😄 Too bad it's not the 29th - that's a perfect day for all our bank accounts to go straight to hell.
"Yellow Submarine" is a children's song -- which are usually written by adults. It was on the "Yellow Submarine" LP because -- unlike any other songs -- it inspired the film.
Giles has done a superb job across all of the reissue projects. There will always be people picking apart approaches, but overall he has done such a great job. And now everyone can talk about next years Rubber Soul box.
Thank you Mitch'n'Rob. Really enjoyed hearing the chat, and your questions to Giles Martin. (Dig those crazy comments eh? Mine should hopefully come in right next to Marc Bolan. This is indeed an honor. I thought he was dead. And how about that long one. Calm down old chap!) Giles resembles his father and sounds a bit like him too, which is reassuring: these projects are in good hands. Eclectic is a very good word for Revolver. For me, both Love You To and Yellow Submarine fit right into that scheme. I'm sensing you don't go for Ringo singing "kiddie songs". Your loss. Aren't they also for the kiddie in all of us? Wasn't Octopus's Garden one of the standout tracks on Abbey Road? It was for me. In fact the Beatles taught us range before we even knew it, from the start. My first experience of Chuck Berry, Little Richard, American mainstream musicals and American girl groups was from when the Beatles covered their songs. On Revolver, you have a taste of classical, Indian, psychedelic, rock guitar... and it all fits. Thanks guys, and best wishes.
This was so much fun listening to you guys talk about the tracks. I am so pumped up for this to come out. Have already pre-ordered. I wanted to ask you guys was how many tracks do you think are going to be released before the box set is released you know like they've done with the previous box sets or they'll release a one track maybe two.
19:40 - At first I thought it was a joke item, for Yellow Submarine to start off as a sad song, but I think that's going to be the first thing I listen to when I get the set next month. One question I have, and I know this is really reaching, but with the original lyrics being "In the town where I was born, no one cared, no one cared", I'm wondering if the quiet section of Yellow Submarine in Pepperland on the soundtrack albuim copped the melody from what Lennon was originally composing. That string section is very sad and it brings tears to my eyes the same as the string section of Nowhere Man when Jeremy is initially left to himself after the song. Just a thought.
From all the press it feels like we needed the invention of this Peter Jackson technology in order for a remix of Revolver to be possible but remixes of some Revolver songs were made for the Yellow Submarine Songtrack album in the 90's! Also, with Sgt Pepper, Giles Martin was able to go back to the pre bounced down tapes. Were these pre bounce recordings not available for Revolver? That would seem strange as both Revolver and Sgt Pepper were recorded using four track technology!
From 1965 the major Top 40 radio stations played ALL tracks from EVERY "Beatles" LP. Typically the LP would be #1 on BOTH LP and Singles charts for the stations.
Great interview, fellas! Great to hear from Giles about it especially. 👍 I only wish you would've asked more about the mono mix though, as there still seems to be some debate, despite being confirmed by Miles, etc, whether or not the mono LP is in fact AAA/analog. Also, many are curious how they went about that process exactly.. Did they use the actual OG mono master tape? Or did they copy it and use that "backup", duplicate tape in order to have all those lacquers cut & copies of the mono LP pressed. Lastly, (not that he would probably know), but how many vinyl copies were pressed of that mono LP? That would answer a lot, whether or not they made a dupe tape, as I can't imagine them running the OG mono master tape 1000's of times in order to press that LP. Just curious! 🙂
Great interview, thank you so much for sharing your impressions ! Have loved everything Giles has done with the music he was given. Respectful is a great word describing his work and I think that is why The Beatles and their families use him because he is respectful of how they wanted this music to sound. Very interesting interview with Giles, thank you for sharing!
With Giles bringing up Prog, I hope the technology will be utilised for such albums as Gentle Giant's In a Glass House, Yes' Going for the One, Tormato and Drama. I'd also love to know Steven Wilson's about the demixing technology as well... Can't wait for Revolver and especially what the technology could be done for the early 2 track recordings too. Also want Blurays for each future release even if it does end up getting released separately.
I HOPE IN THE FUTURE WITH THE NEW TECHNOLOGY WE CAN HAVE SEPARATE INSTRUMENTS FROM LOVE ME DO PS . ILOVE YOU SHE LOVES YOU AND I'LL GET YOU ! . THANKS GUYS GREAT SHOW.
I'm looking forward to a remix of "Life with the Lions" ... Gee, I hope we get a better sounding Yoko on 'Cambridge 1969' ... not to mention how 'Two Minute Silence' is gonna be vastly improved! Hope they have lots of outtakes! : - ) Can't wait!
I´m be tired in waiting this record ready,because when release Let It Be,was a long time waiting that record coming in my hands,now have 3 weeks yet,but seen as is one year.Let´s go for fun and hear Beatles songs in high fidelity my guess.
I have always known the count off on Taxman is George. It sounds totally like him, it's his song, and Paul sounds nothing like that. And Paul says" Fah" instead of "Four", just like "I Saw her Standing There". It's been said Paul does the scream which sounds like "go" right after the countdown.And George has the thickest "brogue" type accent from Liverpool, for lack of a better term.
49:35 - I don't think I've ever heard the Star Club, and in my old age, I'm not sure if I ever had it, and just don't remember, or...what...in any case, it'll take more than AI to get the Star Club out on the open market, I think Paul, Ringo, Olivia and Yoko are against it coming out.
I have always been skeptical of Giles reasons of not being able to remix the early albums because instruments were ‘flattened’ onto one track. Firstly he has wonderful isolations from many early songs on the Love album. How did he do those? Secondly let me give you a hypothetical example. Suppose on take 4 of Taxman the Beatles recorded guitars on Track 1, Bass on Track 2 and Drums on Track 3. Then they mixed all these onto one track and called it Take 5. Then they added Tambourine,Vocals and lead guitar. So Giles is saying on Take 5 the guitars all flattened onto one track. However why can’t he go back to a take 4 which was the source of the final Take 5 and has each instrument isolated. Finally there are several amateur RUclipsrs who have excellent isolations of the early Beatles albums. Like John’s isolated guitar on All My Loving or Paul’s Bass on This Boy.
If they could mix the Yellow Submarine soundtrack in 1999 which, by the way, has early Beatle material, what Giles Martin said about no having the technology to remix early Beatles records make no sense.
Funnily enough, Take 4 of Taxman was originally supposed to be on Anthology 2, and it would've been cool to hear that here, like Take 1 of And Your Bird Can Sing, but whatre ya gonna do?
Because the multitracks of most Revolver songs have the rhythm track confined to just one track. Most of the reduction mixes made were 4 to 3 as opposed to 4 to 1 like on the post Penny Lane material, so they really don't have much to work with there, either. Taxman's pre reduction multi has the rhythm track on one track, two tracks of George's lead and John and Paul's backing vocals, and the tambourine, lead guitar overdubs, and "anybody got a bit of money" vocals. The reduction mix has the two vocal tracks combined and in the newly emptied track they overdubbed the cowbell and the "Mr. Wilson" vocals.
For Giles to say a new mono mix would sound the same as the original mono mix makes no sense. If he can make the drums in Got To Get You Into My Life louder in the new stereo mix, he can make them louder in a new mono mix.
Tony here. I think the stress on the new technology has a lot to do with being able to 'space' the instruments far more effectively in a stereo/multi-channel spectrum. IMHO, making the drums 'louder' in a mono mix would always be at the expense of hearing something else as clearly. Mono mixes, while I love them, are, by their nature, 'crowded'. Louder drums in a well-spaced stereo mix means that your ears can focus on them... or not. But in a mono mix making even a subtle shift in one instrument's levels effects the balance of everything.
@@fab4free4all20 If I could get from you to your honest opinion on something that's bothering me. I'm going to be 67 in January and I grew up with the Beatles along with both of my brothers. I'm a huge fan like everybody else, but what kills me are these people that can't wait for these remixes to come out just to crap on them. I mean I'm seeing it all over the place. Yes I did b**** about good morning good morning on the pepper remix that was way too loud and a couple things on the White Album but this thing is not even out yet and people are already nitpicking. To a lot of them I've already said then don't buy it. If I hear one more time the 66 version is just fine or the 2009 version is just fine well okay then don't buy it the 22 mix. I enjoyed watching you guys video because you were positive about the tracks and that made me get all the more excited about getting it but a lot of people are doing just the opposite and it's a shame.
To me, SO much depends on how much compression will be added to the CD. The surround versions are all perfect sounding. The remixed White Album CDs are perfect. But the Sgt. Pepper and Abbey Road CDs were way over compressed (to sound LOUD).
Ironically, how can a purist complain about this re issue when they should be listening to the mono mixes to start with 🤷🏻♂️🤦. I welcome these box sets for improved stereo sound. The original stereo often has bad edits, drowned out sound effects, and hard panning vocals/drums. The whole catalogue deserves this treatment. Now, we can properly listen to Day Tripper in proper stereo sound!
INFORM yourself: read George Martin's _All You Need is Ears_. It is NOT "panning"; the standard was to record ALL music to one track, and ALL vocals to the other track -- that's why the "hole in the middle" -- THEN MIX the two tracks as MONO because the market was MONO, and the promotional medium, radio, was MONO.
@@jnagarya519 I understand that, but the Beatles music deserves more. I didn’t think Day Tripper was a good song in stereo. Once, I heard the mono version with the drums and vocals in the center I was shocked by the power and beauty of the song. Not only that but Paul’s voice didn’t have an echo. In stereo it sounds silly. Can you really disagree that certain songs just don’t sound right on the original stereo? Also, the newer generation just won’t get that type of odd stereo. For those of you that want the original stereo you can also listen to your original vinyl copy.
@@girlswanted7 I've preferred mono since I began buying records in 1962-63 because most of the "stereo" of the period was FAKE. I've made that point, with an example ("The young Rascals") and how the mono has focus, punch, that stereo does not. The first "Beatles" LP I bought in stereo (side two was FAKE stereo "mixes" of the singles) was "Magical Mystery Tour". All before that were mono, and I still have "Something New" and "Sgt. Pepper's" in first-release mono.
@@jnagarya519 I was blown away by some of those mono mixes. Sgt. Pepper in mono is fantastic. That being said mono sound especially today can be limiting. That is why I enjoy the new stereo mixes. As long at they don’t add vocals, music, or sound effects (Love Remix) I’m okay with making the music on the analog tape sound as good as possible. Plus it’s George Martins son doing the mixes with Paul’s (Ringo, Ono, Olivia) approval.
I don't care - I don't care - I don't care - I DON'T CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm an original Beatles fan, which means that my birth certificate was chiseled onto slate, a long, long, LONG time ago!!!! I had heard OF them, way back in '62-'63 and I was glued to my television on Sunday night, February 9, 1964, as they played on the Ed Sullivan Show!!!!! I LOVE THE BEATLES!!! - what I DO NOT love, is the fact that those in power, at Apple, are caving to TODAY'S KIDS and saying "F#&K YOU"!!!!!!!!!, to older people, like me, who have been Beatle fans for more than half a century!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's just MEAN!!! That's the only way I can put it. All this new technology is wonderful, IF you can understand it!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST GIVE US OLD PEOPLE A GODDAM, MUTHA-F#&KIN Blu-ray, with the 5.1/Atmos mix on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Am I the ONLY older person on the face of the earth that has the balls to bitch about this?!!!!!!! I DO NOT want a "code" or whatever you idiots are suggesting, to download the 5.1 version of "Revolver"!!!!!!!!!! I want a physical Blu-ray disc, that I can hold in my hand!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't understand all of this computer bulls#!t, as it is. You're lucky I can find and use "RUclips"!!!!!!!!!!!!! I and others, of my generation, don't have too many years left, on this planet!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You people should be ashamed of yourselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The least you assholes could do is sell it separately!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Giles Martin remake this new remix with helping of Peter Jackson,but that Dolby Atmos seen as have in ITunes surround sound only.Because in fisic material no have this system.Leave the wish a few this fault.
Thanks but I have to respectfully disagree. We KNOW we step on each other a lot. It's unavoidable with 3 hosts. But we, and our listeners, have found so many instances where one of the three will share a thought-proving revelation that will ignite another piece of discussion. We definitely appreciate the feedback which we take VERY seriously. Much appreciated - Mitch
however - to physically have the highest quality audio available in lossless hi-res it facilitates the need of a blu-ray drive/player. Apple could do what MPL does and supply a download code for high res stereo tracks. This past Friday Pink Floyd just released a box set that contains all the audio available in various formats; Vinyl, cd, dvd & blu-ray (stereo & 5.1). Less than a year ago and just on the recent Get Back disc releases - 5.1 and/orATMOS has been a common component
That’s all you got from this show and interview? We have no beef. We have been friends since 1984. If you have ever seen or heard our show, which we have been doing for over 10 years, you would know how close we are.
@@Beatletoon Love it when the three of you are together. Love it when on the rare occasion someone mispeaks and is gently corrected by one or the other two. Definitely one of the more listener-friendly and informative (not to mention passionate) Beatles podcasts out there. These guys ARE friends.
That is absolutely ridiculous. I didn’t say we went and kissed his ring. We simply said who was there. So, using your own reasoning, if Paul McCartney was in the same room as Jann Wenner and Paul wanted to talk to you, you would refuse because Jann was in the same room?
![ARGENTINA vs. PERÚ [1-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 12](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xtI25ENDDSY/mqdefault.jpg)
The non-giggles "And Your Bird Can Sing" outtake is actually on the Anthology DVD - they isolated the giggles to a channel separate from the music in 5.1, so I was able to record it clean and burn a cd 15+ years ago. Nice to know that it's getting wider release and on a cd finally.
Not having the Atmos or 5.1 of the album in the boxed set this time is (IMO) a mistake.
I'd also heard the giggle-free version on some bootleg I have at home, I can't think of the name of the compilation, but I'm also glad it's out in the box set now, it'll be better mixed and engineered.
Hi great video! NO Blu-Ray 5.1 mix NO Box Set for Me very very DISAPPOINTED.!!! But you have given me HOPE.
The cd deluxe has dropped in price effective Sept 17, 2022. Peace ✌️ and love to you always mitch, since the toon days at fest.
I wish the vinyl price would drop.
Great interview. Thanks!
Mr. Pete----->
aging hippie
Thank YOU for watching. Have a FAB day!
I was already excited for this box set, but listening to this made me even more excited!!!!!
I know man. I was having a hard time waiting for its release and only hearing Taxman so far off the remix. I preordered the lp. So stoked for the mono versions.
Me too - I just hope I got the cash for it on the 28th 😄😄😄😄 Too bad it's not the 29th - that's a perfect day for all our bank accounts to go straight to hell.
"Yellow Submarine" is a children's song -- which are usually written by adults. It was on the "Yellow Submarine" LP because -- unlike any other songs -- it inspired the film.
Excellent preview and interview guys (as always!). Looking forward to the release!!
Giles has done a superb job across all of the reissue projects. There will always be people picking apart approaches, but overall he has done such a great job. And now everyone can talk about next years Rubber Soul box.
We still gotta wait for this to come out and sink our teeth into this dinner.
Giles is a Pain in the Arse
Thank you Mitch'n'Rob. Really enjoyed hearing the chat, and your questions to Giles Martin. (Dig those crazy comments eh? Mine should hopefully come in right next to Marc Bolan. This is indeed an honor. I thought he was dead. And how about that long one. Calm down old chap!)
Giles resembles his father and sounds a bit like him too, which is reassuring: these projects are in good hands.
Eclectic is a very good word for Revolver.
For me, both Love You To and Yellow Submarine fit right into that scheme. I'm sensing you don't go for Ringo singing "kiddie songs". Your loss. Aren't they also for the kiddie in all of us? Wasn't Octopus's Garden one of the standout tracks on Abbey Road? It was for me.
In fact the Beatles taught us range before we even knew it, from the start. My first experience of Chuck Berry, Little Richard, American mainstream musicals and American girl groups was from when the Beatles covered their songs. On Revolver, you have a taste of classical, Indian, psychedelic, rock guitar... and it all fits.
Thanks guys, and best wishes.
Thanks a lot for the kind words Tony!!!
Can't wait for this to drop ! Do wish it had the blu-ray though.
This was so much fun listening to you guys talk about the tracks. I am so pumped up for this to come out. Have already pre-ordered. I wanted to ask you guys was how many tracks do you think are going to be released before the box set is released you know like they've done with the previous box sets or they'll release a one track maybe two.
19:40 - At first I thought it was a joke item, for Yellow Submarine to start off as a sad song, but I think that's going to be the first thing I listen to when I get the set next month. One question I have, and I know this is really reaching, but with the original lyrics being "In the town where I was born, no one cared, no one cared", I'm wondering if the quiet section of Yellow Submarine in Pepperland on the soundtrack albuim copped the melody from what Lennon was originally composing. That string section is very sad and it brings tears to my eyes the same as the string section of Nowhere Man when Jeremy is initially left to himself after the song. Just a thought.
Good review and interesting insight. Nice to hear from Giles, too. Well done, Mitch and Rob!
From all the press it feels like we needed the invention of this Peter Jackson technology in order for a remix of Revolver to be possible but remixes of some Revolver songs were made for the Yellow Submarine Songtrack album in the 90's!
Also, with Sgt Pepper, Giles Martin was able to go back to the pre bounced down tapes. Were these pre bounce recordings not available for Revolver? That would seem strange as both Revolver and Sgt Pepper were recorded using four track technology!
From 1965 the major Top 40 radio stations played ALL tracks from EVERY "Beatles" LP. Typically the LP would be #1 on BOTH LP and Singles charts for the stations.
Excellent show and interview, very interesting . Can’t wait for release day, really looking forward to getting my hands on the box set.
Great interview, fellas! Great to hear from Giles about it especially. 👍
I only wish you would've asked more about the mono mix though, as there still seems to be some debate, despite being confirmed by Miles, etc, whether or not the mono LP is in fact AAA/analog. Also, many are curious how they went about that process exactly.. Did they use the actual OG mono master tape? Or did they copy it and use that "backup", duplicate tape in order to have all those lacquers cut & copies of the mono LP pressed. Lastly, (not that he would probably know), but how many vinyl copies were pressed of that mono LP? That would answer a lot, whether or not they made a dupe tape, as I can't imagine them running the OG mono master tape 1000's of times in order to press that LP. Just curious! 🙂
Great interview, thank you so much for sharing your impressions ! Have loved everything Giles has done with the music he was given. Respectful is a great word describing his work and I think that is why The Beatles and their families use him because he is respectful of how they wanted this music to sound. Very interesting interview with Giles, thank you for sharing!
With Giles bringing up Prog, I hope the technology will be utilised for such albums as Gentle Giant's In a Glass House, Yes' Going for the One, Tormato and Drama. I'd also love to know Steven Wilson's about the demixing technology as well...
Can't wait for Revolver and especially what the technology could be done for the early 2 track recordings too. Also want Blurays for each future release even if it does end up getting released separately.
Very nice! Thank you!!!
That was fun and informative.
Well worth the wait.
Thanks guys!
#mrChristopherTV
I HOPE IN THE FUTURE WITH THE NEW TECHNOLOGY WE CAN HAVE SEPARATE INSTRUMENTS FROM LOVE ME DO PS . ILOVE YOU SHE LOVES YOU AND I'LL GET YOU ! . THANKS GUYS GREAT SHOW.
I'm looking forward to a remix of "Life with the Lions" ...
Gee, I hope we get a better sounding Yoko on 'Cambridge 1969' ... not to mention how 'Two Minute Silence' is gonna be vastly improved!
Hope they have lots of outtakes!
: - )
Can't wait!
I´m be tired in waiting this record ready,because when release Let It Be,was a long time waiting that record coming in my hands,now have 3 weeks yet,but seen as is one year.Let´s go for fun and hear Beatles songs in high fidelity my guess.
Got to get you into my life, not a drum solo but a drum fill.
I have always known the count off on Taxman is George. It sounds totally like him, it's his song, and Paul sounds nothing like that. And Paul says" Fah" instead of "Four", just like "I Saw her Standing There". It's been said Paul does the scream which sounds like "go" right after the countdown.And George has the thickest "brogue" type accent from Liverpool, for lack of a better term.
@1:00:07 GREAT NEWS for physical media lovers!!
4:12 - Ringo has a box already 😆. He's about 56 years too late for spoiler alerts.
49:35 - I don't think I've ever heard the Star Club, and in my old age, I'm not sure if I ever had it, and just don't remember, or...what...in any case, it'll take more than AI to get the Star Club out on the open market, I think Paul, Ringo, Olivia and Yoko are against it coming out.
How did I get here / good grief, I’ll buy the CD
Weird comment.
Where is the Interview ?
The interview is at the end of this show.
I have always been skeptical of Giles reasons of not being able to remix the early albums because instruments were ‘flattened’ onto one track. Firstly he has wonderful isolations from many early songs on the Love album. How did he do those? Secondly let me give you a hypothetical example. Suppose on take 4 of Taxman the Beatles recorded guitars on Track 1, Bass on Track 2 and Drums on Track 3. Then they mixed all these onto one track and called it Take 5. Then they added Tambourine,Vocals and lead guitar. So Giles is saying on Take 5 the guitars all flattened onto one track. However why can’t he go back to a take 4 which was the source of the final Take 5 and has each instrument isolated. Finally there are several amateur RUclipsrs who have excellent isolations of the early Beatles albums. Like John’s isolated guitar on All My Loving or Paul’s Bass on This Boy.
If they could mix the Yellow Submarine soundtrack in 1999 which, by the way, has early Beatle material, what Giles Martin said about no having the technology to remix early Beatles records make no sense.
Funnily enough, Take 4 of Taxman was originally supposed to be on Anthology 2, and it would've been cool to hear that here, like Take 1 of And Your Bird Can Sing, but whatre ya gonna do?
Prof Stoned just made new stereo mixes of the first four Beatles albums on his blog, it can be done.
Because the multitracks of most Revolver songs have the rhythm track confined to just one track. Most of the reduction mixes made were 4 to 3 as opposed to 4 to 1 like on the post Penny Lane material, so they really don't have much to work with there, either. Taxman's pre reduction multi has the rhythm track on one track, two tracks of George's lead and John and Paul's backing vocals, and the tambourine, lead guitar overdubs, and "anybody got a bit of money" vocals. The reduction mix has the two vocal tracks combined and in the newly emptied track they overdubbed the cowbell and the "Mr. Wilson" vocals.
So are you saying that Giles Martin is a liar?
For Giles to say a new mono mix would sound the same as the original mono mix makes no sense. If he can make the drums in Got To Get You Into My Life louder in the new stereo mix, he can make them louder in a new mono mix.
True, although roughly 3 people on this planet would be interested in a mono mix.
Tony here. I think the stress on the new technology has a lot to do with being able to 'space' the instruments far more effectively in a stereo/multi-channel spectrum. IMHO, making the drums 'louder' in a mono mix would always be at the expense of hearing something else as clearly. Mono mixes, while I love them, are, by their nature, 'crowded'. Louder drums in a well-spaced stereo mix means that your ears can focus on them... or not. But in a mono mix making even a subtle shift in one instrument's levels effects the balance of everything.
@@fab4free4all20 If I could get from you to your honest opinion on something that's bothering me. I'm going to be 67 in January and I grew up with the Beatles along with both of my brothers. I'm a huge fan like everybody else, but what kills me are these people that can't wait for these remixes to come out just to crap on them. I mean I'm seeing it all over the place. Yes I did b**** about good morning good morning on the pepper remix that was way too loud and a couple things on the White Album but this thing is not even out yet and people are already nitpicking. To a lot of them I've already said then don't buy it. If I hear one more time the 66 version is just fine or the 2009 version is just fine well okay then don't buy it the 22 mix. I enjoyed watching you guys video because you were positive about the tracks and that made me get all the more excited about getting it but a lot of people are doing just the opposite and it's a shame.
To me, SO much depends on how much compression will be added to the CD. The surround versions are all perfect sounding. The remixed White Album CDs are perfect. But the Sgt. Pepper and Abbey Road CDs were way over compressed (to sound LOUD).
Where can I listen to the interview?
The interview is included in this show at the end.
Oh ok lol I turned it off to look for it 😅
@@leepaulturner83 LOL. No worries. Hope you enjoy it!
Ironically, how can a purist complain about this re issue when they should be listening to the mono mixes to start with 🤷🏻♂️🤦. I welcome these box sets for improved stereo sound. The original stereo often has bad edits, drowned out sound effects, and hard panning vocals/drums. The whole catalogue deserves this treatment. Now, we can properly listen to Day Tripper in proper stereo sound!
INFORM yourself: read George Martin's _All You Need is Ears_. It is NOT "panning"; the standard was to record ALL music to one track, and ALL vocals to the other track -- that's why the "hole in the middle" -- THEN MIX the two tracks as MONO because the market was MONO, and the promotional medium, radio, was MONO.
@@jnagarya519 I understand that, but the Beatles music deserves more. I didn’t think Day Tripper was a good song in stereo. Once, I heard the mono version with the drums and
vocals in the center I was shocked by the power and beauty of the song. Not only that but Paul’s voice didn’t have an echo. In stereo it sounds silly. Can you really disagree that certain songs just don’t sound right on the original stereo? Also, the newer generation just won’t get that type of odd stereo. For those of you that want the original stereo you can also listen to your original vinyl copy.
@@girlswanted7 I've preferred mono since I began buying records in 1962-63 because most of the "stereo" of the period was FAKE.
I've made that point, with an example ("The young Rascals") and how the mono has focus, punch, that stereo does not.
The first "Beatles" LP I bought in stereo (side two was FAKE stereo "mixes" of the singles) was "Magical Mystery Tour". All before that were mono, and I still have "Something New" and "Sgt. Pepper's" in first-release mono.
@@jnagarya519 I was blown away by some of those mono mixes. Sgt. Pepper in mono is fantastic. That being said mono sound especially today can be limiting. That is why I enjoy the new stereo mixes. As long at they don’t add vocals, music, or sound effects (Love Remix) I’m okay with making the music on the analog tape sound as good as possible. Plus it’s George Martins son doing the mixes with Paul’s (Ringo, Ono, Olivia) approval.
@@girlswanted7 Giles is being conservative: he is using the mono as the model for the stereo re/mixes. And that is fitting.
Experienced writers know when to put off a piece that isn't yet "working".
I don't care - I don't care - I don't care - I DON'T CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm an original Beatles fan, which means that my birth certificate was chiseled onto slate, a long, long, LONG time ago!!!! I had heard OF them, way back in '62-'63 and I was glued to my television on Sunday night, February 9, 1964, as they played on the Ed Sullivan Show!!!!! I LOVE THE BEATLES!!! - what I DO NOT love, is the fact that those in power, at Apple, are caving to TODAY'S KIDS and saying "F#&K YOU"!!!!!!!!!, to older people, like me, who have been Beatle fans for more than half a century!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's just MEAN!!! That's the only way I can put it. All this new technology is wonderful, IF you can understand it!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST GIVE US OLD PEOPLE A GODDAM, MUTHA-F#&KIN Blu-ray, with the 5.1/Atmos mix on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Am I the ONLY older person on the face of the earth that has the balls to bitch about this?!!!!!!! I DO NOT want a "code" or whatever you idiots are suggesting, to download the 5.1 version of "Revolver"!!!!!!!!!! I want a physical Blu-ray disc, that I can hold in my hand!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't understand all of this computer bulls#!t, as it is. You're lucky I can find and use "RUclips"!!!!!!!!!!!!! I and others, of my generation, don't have too many years left, on this planet!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You people should be ashamed of yourselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The least you assholes could do is sell it separately!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is no 5.1 mix, unfortunately.
I agree..Same feelings at 66 years old
Agree 💯 %
Giles Martin remake this new remix with helping of Peter Jackson,but that Dolby Atmos seen as have in ITunes surround sound only.Because in fisic material no have this system.Leave the wish a few this fault.
Paul played bass on She Said She Said! Not George. Thanks Giles!
I'm not so sure...
Isn't this the song that George helped John write, and caused Macca to walk out on the session,- leaving George to play bass ?
This pod cast is way better with just 2 people. Hardly any interruptions of thoughts that make it , at times, unlistenable.
Thanks but I have to respectfully disagree. We KNOW we step on each other a lot. It's unavoidable with 3 hosts. But we, and our listeners, have found so many instances where one of the three will share a thought-proving revelation that will ignite another piece of discussion. We definitely appreciate the feedback which we take VERY seriously. Much appreciated - Mitch
Giles sounds a bit defensive.
It’s not a kids song
It is, but that doesn't mean adults can't enjoy it.
LOL. Old guys with their Blu-ray players! .. "He's right you know." It's Beatles music - not Beatles movie. Go watch Avatar.
however - to physically have the highest quality audio available in lossless hi-res it facilitates the need of a blu-ray drive/player. Apple could do what MPL does and supply a download code for high res stereo tracks. This past Friday Pink Floyd just released a box set that contains all the audio available in various formats; Vinyl, cd, dvd & blu-ray (stereo & 5.1). Less than a year ago and just on the recent Get Back disc releases - 5.1 and/orATMOS has been a common component
Yeah, and you know what you can go do.
Seems like these two guys have a beef, although they don’t show it. The other one tells the other you are wrong, it is this , it is that etc
That’s all you got from this show and interview? We have no beef. We have been friends since 1984. If you have ever seen or heard our show, which we have been doing for over 10 years, you would know how close we are.
@@Beatletoon Love it when the three of you are together. Love it when on the rare occasion someone mispeaks and is gently corrected by one or the other two. Definitely one of the more listener-friendly and informative (not to mention passionate) Beatles podcasts out there. These guys ARE friends.
Thanks so much John. We appreciate you!
Think I “liked” my own comment. Sorry about that!
I think you're looking into it too much.
If he does that, he alters the album which is NOT what we want
You mentioned someone from ‘Rolling Stone’ and I switched off. Propagating Lennon’s lies for over 50 years.
That is absolutely ridiculous. I didn’t say we went and kissed his ring. We simply said who was there. So, using your own reasoning, if Paul McCartney was in the same room as Jann Wenner and Paul wanted to talk to you, you would refuse because Jann was in the same room?
You guys aren't very good. That interview was pretty unpleasant. The questions asked and comments made are a bit silly.
We’ll try harder next time. Oh, please send us the link to YOUR interview with Giles.