The #Zonal_Marking. I love that. Why? Because it helps to keep a team solid defensively ✊🏾. I’m coaching a team in our 1st Division here in Belize 🇧🇿 , and that’s my preference.
I think fully man-oriented (personal) pressing (when all players stick to their opponent and go with them to the end) like one Gasperini uses has major weakness as it can be overcome by individually superior opponent. Personal (or man-oriented) pressing is easier to implement as you dont have to read the game and movement of all players all the time but it can be beaten easier than zonal (or ball-oriented) pressing which requires from players to anticipate and read situation not just sticking with your man. So in a way zonal pressing develops players tactically better.
I agree with your comment. Now a lot of coach are using man to man press because a lot of teams and coachs works very well with build-up and positional occupation on the field. So i think they hate being dominated by opponents and prefer risking more. A man to man press is less ordered and leaves a lot of space behind because there is no cover and it all depends on individual performance. There is no a perfect way to defend because the field is very long and large. For me will be hybrid defense systems in the future.
If one were better, then everyone would just do it. No choice is without risk, you have to give up something and learn to live with it no matter which choice you make. The real skill is in the choosing of a particular defensive tactic.
Hi !! I really enjoy your content. Keep up the great work. I'd really like to know what program you use to generate the pitch, players etc. Thanks in advance !!
Slight correction - zonal marking was pioneered (or at least used to great effect) by Zezé Moreira of Brazil much before Helenio Herrera. This was mainly because the diagonal (Brazilian football's version of the WM) led to a transition from the classic back 3 to a half-back joining the defence and becoming a back 4.
@@FootballMeta Just watched your video on 4 4 2 Dimond thank you for sending it to me, I will look to use some of these tips with my Grassroots teams I coach Thank You
Well it depends on what formation the opposition is playing, but I think as I said in the video, a mixture of both is fundamental. A high press is good with both, but a more aggressive high press such as with Atalanta will usually adopt a man marking system
@Trung Quang however, they're also proof where man marking if not done correctly, could cost the game, take the final ucl madrid vs liv for example, robbo marked modric too high and was outsmarted
@Trung Quang yepp, but marking modric high turns out to be the only goal they conceded. All in all, both are important, one must know when to pressure, and when to zonal-man. Hard to do than being said.
80% of all goals come from an unmarked player in the shooting arc. Inside your own end, there is no option other than to play man-to-man. Markup or lose.
You can only man-mark with the right players. You can look stupid if the player is not up to the job. Zonal marking requires more athleticism. Players must run more.
Comes out the same day as Tifo’s analysis, but better. Nice job 😏
Bro i was thinking this like why😂
Agreed. Tifo doesnt really give a tactical analysis on their tactical analysis videos.
This guy breaks it down properly
what is the name of this big coaching board ?
The #Zonal_Marking. I love that. Why? Because it helps to keep a team solid defensively ✊🏾. I’m coaching a team in our 1st Division here in Belize 🇧🇿 , and that’s my preference.
Hello I'm 16 and looking to join football, I got a question, do I need to know flashy skills to beat defenders if so do I need to know a lot?
I think fully man-oriented (personal) pressing (when all players stick to their opponent and go with them to the end) like one Gasperini uses has major weakness as it can be overcome by individually superior opponent. Personal (or man-oriented) pressing is easier to implement as you dont have to read the game and movement of all players all the time but it can be beaten easier than zonal (or ball-oriented) pressing which requires from players to anticipate and read situation not just sticking with your man. So in a way zonal pressing develops players tactically better.
Lies again? MMA Fighter Miami Florida
But if you rely on man-to-man pressure, it will be easier to manipulate you and create spaces with your players' movements
I agree with your comment. Now a lot of coach are using man to man press because a lot of teams and coachs works very well with build-up and positional occupation on the field. So i think they hate being dominated by opponents and prefer risking more. A man to man press is less ordered and leaves a lot of space behind because there is no cover and it all depends on individual performance. There is no a perfect way to defend because the field is very long and large. For me will be hybrid defense systems in the future.
Zonal man marking in defense and man to man at mid field or strikers
Just discovered this channel, and so glad I did.
If one were better, then everyone would just do it. No choice is without risk, you have to give up something and learn to live with it no matter which choice you make. The real skill is in the choosing of a particular defensive tactic.
Thank you, you're a football tactics tank!👏
You're videos are amazing and your systematic stepwise approach to explain is 💯💯
*YOUR
Hi !! I really enjoy your content. Keep up the great work.
I'd really like to know what program you use to generate the pitch, players etc.
Thanks in advance !!
Slight correction - zonal marking was pioneered (or at least used to great effect) by Zezé Moreira of Brazil much before Helenio Herrera.
This was mainly because the diagonal (Brazilian football's version of the WM) led to a transition from the classic back 3 to a half-back joining the defence and becoming a back 4.
I love your videos! Gave me much clearer idea on football tactics, thank you!
Thanks man
love these videos
Nicely Explained 👌
Thank you!
Very good expained.I like it 😍👍👏👏👏
Finally i found my Channel . Thank you for this Amazing videos.
Love your Videos
Question would the Dimond formation work in the modern game?
Thank you!
It definitely can, I recently made a video on this formation, go check it out 😉 ruclips.net/video/_kUugmMM2Ss/видео.html
@@FootballMeta Just watched your video on 4 4 2 Dimond thank you for sending it to me, I will look to use some of these tips with my Grassroots teams I coach
Thank You
So which formations are better for zonal and which for man - marking?
Is high pressure better with zonal or with man marking?
Well it depends on what formation the opposition is playing, but I think as I said in the video, a mixture of both is fundamental. A high press is good with both, but a more aggressive high press such as with Atalanta will usually adopt a man marking system
@@FootballMeta Xavi's Barcelona also uses a man-marking system
Great content
Very nice video, but I wanna highlight the extremely good pronunciation of Italian names and terms, really appreciated 😃
Grazie bello 😘
I like zonal marking overall with man marking used occasionally for dangerous attackers and set pieces
great video Mr Meta.....i think i prefer zonal marking....
Thank you, I think I do too, it's more structured and logical!
I love this channel
Super info
Thank you
Nice👍👍
Can we see pragmatists vs ideologues?
Man marking gives less chance for midfielder to shoot
1st comment
Zonal-man orientation is the best though
@Trung Quang however, they're also proof where man marking if not done correctly, could cost the game, take the final ucl madrid vs liv for example, robbo marked modric too high and was outsmarted
@Trung Quang yepp, but marking modric high turns out to be the only goal they conceded. All in all, both are important, one must know when to pressure, and when to zonal-man. Hard to do than being said.
Please explain ralf Rangnick 4,2,2,2.
I hope the extra 2 is a mistake
@@jufref i think.. Its correct
@@normanjoshua6950 it's correct lol,I am just dumb,thought it was 44222
@@jufref it's alright.. Cheers 🥂
For sure, I will be covering this shortly!
80% of all goals come from an unmarked player in the shooting arc. Inside your own end, there is no option other than to play man-to-man. Markup or lose.
You can only man-mark with the right players. You can look stupid if the player is not up to the job.
Zonal marking requires more athleticism. Players must run more.
Both markings are on poin based on how is adopted.
Man Marking ❤
Top
🙌🏻
i think man marking is the best the false 9 doesnt matter because if you mark them tight with big and tall and fast defenders you will never concede.