The acme of beautiful watch design were the 40’s and early 50’s. The nadir started in the 70’s and did last until the early 2000s. Well done Longines for bringing this gorgeous baby.
I've got the new Longines Hydroconquest and love the watch. I looked at the Oris Aquis and Tag Formula 1 and the Longines felt better built. Longines makes a great watch.
Hey Bruce, another great video and stunning camera work! At times I'm not of fan of these big conglomerate watch companies like Swatch but it really helps brands on the lower end of the companies profile, I really do see a great service to the less expensive brands being able to get top of the line parts, service and shared ideas for their watches.. Starting with Tissot, Hamilton, Mido, Rado, Certina and Longines and that's just under this one umbrella, they seem to have a wonderful work force, advantage of sourcing in-house parts and many departments sharing thoughts to bring a better watch at cheaper prices to the market.. Which in turn is better to all of us.
I don't have a really big watch collection, just 14 or so. But this Longines is definitely in the top 3, together with a Grand Seiko and Cartier Tank. It is an amazing watch, you'll never get bored with it. A compliment getter as well, since it is so different from all other watches.
It is a shame that they couldn't fit the proper movement inside this case. The movement used is obviously too small, hence the odd position of the small-seconds subdial. I think that it would be better to either fit a movement of proper size (some of the wonderful Valgranges seems like a reasonable option), or to ditch a small-seconds complication and go with regular central seconds hand. This Longines IMHO presents a missed opportunity, all the ingredients were there, but in the end the result is sub-par.
Why is it that every time you present a watch in a video, I start drooling? Probably because of your stellar presentation. This is a simply beautiful timepiece. I would prefer a screw down case back but I’m funny that way. Thanks for this.
This is a beautiful watch and I love the blued hands. I have the Chronograph-triple calendar-moon phase (Master Collection) and it's pretty much the opposite of this in that it's packed with information. I love it, but as with this I find the anti-reflection treatment could be better; this is a minor problem with mine given it's the dark blue and silvered hardware version which is already somewhat "obscure". The watch has gained only a few seconds in it's first month - love Longines.
Its movement is out of proportion to the case. That's why the subsidiary second dial is located weirdly close to the center. Definitely a deal breaker for me.
I like silver stainless steel bracelet, and silver bezel, with baton hour markers. The understated look. But the dial needs to be champagne colour which gives aura of vintage and a bit of contrast to the silver. Plus 36mm case for my 6.25 wrist.
Its ironic that only part of a watch that is not visible when being worn is the back. I think case backs are terribly overrated once you have seen the movement a few times nobody really looks at the movement again. Plus this case back on this piece is very nice as it is. Also I see a lot of comments complaining about water resistance, this is a dress watch not a diver why would you want extra, its not like your going diving in this piece.
Not thrilled with the laser etching on the caseback, but agree with the decision not to be exhibition. Not, however, for the reasons you mentioned: Quite simply the movement would be too small relative to the case size of the watch. Terrific review though!
No question, this is a pretty watch. I've given thought to including it in my collection. However, I personally think the Longines Heritage Military without the sub-seconds dial at 6 0'clock is the nicer watch.
Teachering The Heritage Military is in a class by itself. The other watch in my collection I like as much is the Rado Captain Cook 37mm. They’re both outstanding!
Samuel, the reason why is I talk about watches at thier going market rate, which for this one is around 1000. I doubt outside maybe it's initial release anyone has paid close to retail. If they have, they shouldn't have as it is available for much less
There are already many different variants of the Calatrava, even just considering the Longines iterations. An exhibition caseback would be a welcome enhancement next release. The Pateks have had them for years.
Once you mentioned the concern of others about the puny size of the seconds subdial, I agree and can't unsee it. That's a miss for me on this one. And why the goofy, arched "automatic" under the subdial? That seems incongruent. Would be much better to move "automatic" in a smaller font straight under LONGINES, and make the seconds subdial bigger. Also agree that the no exhibition caseback is a miss. Otherwise, love the hands, color, size, and other design features of this watch.
Thank you for the review, I really liked how you did it. If I may have a question, what would you think between this one and a Nomos Metro? While both representing different styles and schools, the first time I saw the heritage it instantly reminded me of Nomos Metro
Think Tissot petite seconde is similar with a hand wound decorated movement and has executed the sub seconds better. Obviously pedigree is different but they are both currently within Swatch.
Fantastic video as always, thank you for doing what you do week in and week out. I am still very early in my watch collecting, still forming my tastes. I have the current gen Omega Seamaster 300M Professional as my first quality watch (I have other watches like a Glycine Combat Sub and Yema Superman). I was considering this watch as I have been looking at aviation inspired watches. I ended up with a Bremont Airco Mach 2, I just fell in love with the case designs of Bremont (I bought it at a discount about 30% off new pricing). As others have mentioned I love this watch but started to not like the symetry of the sub seconds dial.
I owned this watch for a couple of months. My only gripe is that the high polish bezel is shiny and can reflect light right into your eyes when you are looking at it. Can be a bit annoying.
Hey Bruce. Came across your channel recently when was researching Zenith Defy. Really like the camera work and the channel generally. Keep up the good work! Since you talked about the beauty of the balance beating away I have a favor to ask. I like open heart watches but its really hard to find one that I love and would buy. Can you please make a video about open balance watches? Price up to 20k retail, 39-42mm, date function. I understand getting them to shoot a video is not easy so pictures would be totally fine. Just tell us about this type of watches and your favorites. Here is my list but obviously there are issues so haven’t bought any of them yet. 1.Zenith Defy skeleton. I love the shape, the bracelet, the brand, the movement, size, presence of date however its a shame the visibility of moving parts is very limited and the dial is hard to read. 2. Glasshutte panoinverse: beautiful watch from brand I adore. And that decorated balance bridge is mesmerizing to look at. Problem is its too dressy. Cant see wearing it every day 3. Zenith El primero with open balance: the non chronograph version with a big date and moonphase has the dial I like but not a fan of case shape and lug design. I like more restrained, German style design with edges and short downsloping lugs like Glasshutte has. 4. Ulysse Nardin marine tourbillon: love the blue enamel version. Unfortunately 43 mm is too big on my wrist and no date is disappointing. This brand is so underrated. Own dual time with black dial, still cant believe I paid just 5k for it (retail around 9k). Anyway. Please share some thoughts.
Very nice watch, however I don't like the colour of the strap. Does it match the dial? I also think the mesh bracelet is absolutely not for that kind of watches, although I have it on some of my other pieces. Nice video, maybe you could advise the measurements (lug size, lug to lug, thickness, strap at buckle...) Negative the case back, I agree, and the price, it is about 400-500 € too expensive.
I like ur reviews but in the future pls give details about the clasps . It’s as important as the bezel . I hate pressed metal like my dive extension on my longines and my tag Heuer , my oris has by far the best clasp and bracelet in my modest collection . Thanks in advance and greets from belgium .
I'm on the point of buying one of these and it's very discouraging as you keep on reminding me of the bath I'm going to take if/when I choose to sell it. 30m WR is a disappointment. 'Biscuit tinny' profile, not a fan. 40mm? Would have preferred 38; whatever. No display back? Oh dear. In other words this watch is selling on virtually the dial and hands alone. Longines have turned a potential no-brainer into real struggle for someone on a budget.
I like Tissot, but not even close. The balance of the sub-second dial is lovely here with the contoured "Automatic" and it doesn't obscure the "6" like the Tissot does, it has those blued hands, an elegant logo font, applied index pips, and a restraint with the every other hour numbering. Also the Longines is 4hz vs. 2.5hz with only slightly less power reserve. The bronze dial. That Tissot can't touch it.
That’s a good question. I likely would prefer Nomos. Independent instead of Swatchgroup. Glashütte instead of Switzerland (more special to me). Small manufacturer. In-house movement. Quality and price at the same level, I assume.
Nice-looking watch. I have a question about the Swatch group. What is the point of buying so many companies that are in the same category? Seiko and Orient are owned by the same company etc. Is the goal to dominate a segment of the market, or are they just competing with themselves? It reminds me of GMC, and we know how that went.
Good looking watch, love the classic style. Have you covered any Dan Henry watches? The printing done on those dials seems very well done for the price. Particularly the Longines reminds me a little bit of the Dan Henry 1947.
kool watch,I do own one of this brand (hydroconquest)and find it to be a great value with a brand that stands on its own. When you make a suggestion like the caseback does that suggestion ever reach the suits that make these things possible ? It was a great idea !
Way too big with a 40 mm case diameter, that empty dial looks ridiculous. It would have been such a lovely watch at 36 mm or so. I'm so sick of oversize watches.
I don't mean to rain on your parade...but "One of the Top $1000 watches" is concerning when it initially cost over $1800....if it was truly superb, would one expect that the value should be increasing instead of approaching half price? Asking for a friend...a friend that wears a 214270.
Unfortunately Longines fucked up the size...same like on other reissues. Think of the beautiful big eye chrono, which I really wanted until I've seen its dimension in real life...40 mm is too large for this piece, especially since there's lot of dial surface. Also the proportion of the sub dial size to the overall size isnt right in my view. Longines has great models and great quality but in my view missed to make a 100 % right reissue so far.
Not sure why they would take such a nice-looking watch and put that hideous brown strap on it. Did the leather come from Roy Rogers or James Arness old saddle?
One of the most beautiful watches available. Almost perfect.
Beauty. Keep thinking of this watch. Little Bauhaus style about it.
Colin Benfield I picked it today. It’s so beautiful.
The acme of beautiful watch design were the 40’s and early 50’s. The nadir started in the 70’s and did last until the early 2000s. Well done Longines for bringing this gorgeous baby.
Agreed!
I've got the new Longines Hydroconquest and love the watch. I looked at the Oris Aquis and Tag Formula 1 and the Longines felt better built. Longines makes a great watch.
Nice!! I've been wanting to see that one as well because it looks excellent from the pics online I've seen
@@BruceWilliams Hey Bruce,
Would love to see a comparison between the Longines hydroconquest and oris aquis.
Keep up the great content.
Can you post the Milanese strap, you show in the video? Looks just perfect in addition to the leather strap. Thx.
Only negative is smallish sub dial compared to size of case.
Yeah, its out of proportion.
Worst thing about it. Otherwise very nice.
Dress watches were always Longines' "strong suit", and this one is real beauty. Well done, Longines!
Doesn’t seem to be a dress watch or?
I have this watch love it , Rolex Tudor for example also don’t have open case backs .
Hey Bruce, another great video and stunning camera work! At times I'm not of fan of these big conglomerate watch companies like Swatch but it really helps brands on the lower end of the companies profile, I really do see a great service to the less expensive brands being able to get top of the line parts, service and shared ideas for their watches.. Starting with Tissot, Hamilton, Mido, Rado, Certina and Longines and that's just under this one umbrella, they seem to have a wonderful work force, advantage of sourcing in-house parts and many departments sharing thoughts to bring a better watch at cheaper prices to the market.. Which in turn is better to all of us.
You are right. This looks gorgeous on the mesh. 👍👍👍 May be buying a longines.
Beautiful classic and classy looking timepiece! Love that crown too👍🏻
I don't have a really big watch collection, just 14 or so. But this Longines is definitely in the top 3, together with a Grand Seiko and Cartier Tank. It is an amazing watch, you'll never get bored with it. A compliment getter as well, since it is so different from all other watches.
It is a shame that they couldn't fit the proper movement inside this case. The movement used is obviously too small, hence the odd position of the small-seconds subdial. I think that it would be better to either fit a movement of proper size (some of the wonderful Valgranges seems like a reasonable option), or to ditch a small-seconds complication and go with regular central seconds hand. This Longines IMHO presents a missed opportunity, all the ingredients were there, but in the end the result is sub-par.
I own this one and love it. Agree on case back. Also it’s a pain to try and photograph this one.
What a beautiful watch!!! I love it.
I like Longines very much, lately. Stunning
Why is it that every time you present a watch in a video, I start drooling? Probably because of your stellar presentation. This is a simply beautiful timepiece. I would prefer a screw down case back but I’m funny that way. Thanks for this.
I like it better on the strap. Beautiful reminds when Longines was considered more top shelf
I agree the sub second dial is too small and it needs to be equi-distant between the centre and the edge at 6.00
Agree. The case is too big for the movement. They should make a smaller version or use a bigger movement.
many thanks for introducing so many great watches. The quality of your videos is simply sensational, keep up the good work!
This is a beautiful watch and I love the blued hands.
I have the Chronograph-triple calendar-moon phase (Master Collection) and it's pretty much the opposite of this in that it's packed with information. I love it, but as with this I find the anti-reflection treatment could be better; this is a minor problem with mine given it's the dark blue and silvered hardware version which is already somewhat "obscure". The watch has gained only a few seconds in it's first month - love Longines.
Its movement is out of proportion to the case. That's why the subsidiary second dial is located weirdly close to the center. Definitely a deal breaker for me.
@Motor City Cobra Make this watch in 36mm then the proportion and whole vibe will be perfectly spot-on.
Reminds me a bit of the Seamaster 1948
I like silver stainless steel bracelet, and silver bezel, with baton hour markers. The understated look.
But the dial needs to be champagne colour which gives aura of vintage and a bit of contrast to the silver.
Plus 36mm case for my 6.25 wrist.
Its ironic that only part of a watch that is not visible when being worn is the back. I think case backs are terribly overrated once you have seen the movement a few times nobody really looks at the movement again. Plus this case back on this piece is very nice as it is. Also I see a lot of comments complaining about water resistance, this is a dress watch not a diver why would you want extra, its not like your going diving in this piece.
Not thrilled with the laser etching on the caseback, but agree with the decision not to be exhibition. Not, however, for the reasons you mentioned: Quite simply the movement would be too small relative to the case size of the watch. Terrific review though!
A GREAT DESIGN...A MINIMAL BEAUTY
No question, this is a pretty watch. I've given thought to including it in my collection. However, I personally think the Longines Heritage Military without the sub-seconds dial at 6 0'clock is the nicer watch.
Teachering The Heritage Military is in a class by itself. The other watch in my collection I like as much is the Rado Captain Cook 37mm. They’re both outstanding!
Of the Longines Heritage line, my pick would be the Classic Sector dial, which also features a silicone hairspring.
I dont understand why you don’t analyse the watch at its $1800 price tag surely that would affect your perception of the piece.
No one would buy it at that price when you can get it for $1260 at Jomashop.
Jim Alaska Because Jomashop sells gray market watches, and their customer service would stink up a pig sty!
@@jeeperspeepers8323 I've bought several watches from Jomashop and have never had a problem--knock on wood! :)
Samuel, the reason why is I talk about watches at thier going market rate, which for this one is around 1000. I doubt outside maybe it's initial release anyone has paid close to retail. If they have, they shouldn't have as it is available for much less
was just looking at one today. defiantly peaks my interest
There are already many different variants of the Calatrava, even just considering the Longines iterations. An exhibition caseback would be a welcome enhancement next release. The Pateks have had them for years.
The mesh really elevates this watch.
Stunning watch! What is the dimensions of this particular piece? I think this is one of your few videos that doesn't feature that information.
40mm Case size.
Keen to hear from anyone else who has one, is the spinning of the rotor quite audible?
Winding that movement is silky smooooth
Sharp looking watch. 👍
38 maybe 39mm and it would’ve been perfect for that style imho but definitely still quite the looker for sure - great vid as always
Thanks!
I really like it on the leather. I bet it would look nice on a tan crocodile or tan ostrich strap!
I thought about black ostrich, but I agree those would be killer!
First. Nice Longines!
Once you mentioned the concern of others about the puny size of the seconds subdial, I agree and can't unsee it. That's a miss for me on this one. And why the goofy, arched "automatic" under the subdial? That seems incongruent. Would be much better to move "automatic" in a smaller font straight under LONGINES, and make the seconds subdial bigger. Also agree that the no exhibition caseback is a miss. Otherwise, love the hands, color, size, and other design features of this watch.
Thank you for the review, I really liked how you did it. If I may have a question, what would you think between this one and a Nomos Metro? While both representing different styles and schools, the first time I saw the heritage it instantly reminded me of Nomos Metro
I love that mesh bracelet. Can you point us to the place where we can purchase it Bruce? thanks, nice vid 👌🏼
what a beautiful clock wow
Do you remember where you bought the mesh bracelet for this? Looks fantastic!
Think Tissot petite seconde is similar with a hand wound decorated movement and has executed the sub seconds better. Obviously pedigree is different but they are both currently within Swatch.
Fantastic video as always, thank you for doing what you do week in and week out. I am still very early in my watch collecting, still forming my tastes. I have the current gen Omega Seamaster 300M Professional as my first quality watch (I have other watches like a Glycine Combat Sub and Yema Superman). I was considering this watch as I have been looking at aviation inspired watches. I ended up with a Bremont Airco Mach 2, I just fell in love with the case designs of Bremont (I bought it at a discount about 30% off new pricing). As others have mentioned I love this watch but started to not like the symetry of the sub seconds dial.
I think you have made a better choice because this is not an aviation-inspired watch.
Thermally BLUED. Tempered is in reference to hardness.
Thanks for the assist my friend!
Class
Where can I purchase that Milanese bracelet for this same watch?
I owned this watch for a couple of months. My only gripe is that the high polish bezel is shiny and can reflect light right into your eyes when you are looking at it. Can be a bit annoying.
Hey Bruce. Came across your channel recently when was researching Zenith Defy. Really like the camera work and the channel generally. Keep up the good work!
Since you talked about the beauty of the balance beating away I have a favor to ask. I like open heart watches but its really hard to find one that I love and would buy. Can you please make a video about open balance watches? Price up to 20k retail, 39-42mm, date function. I understand getting them to shoot a video is not easy so pictures would be totally fine. Just tell us about this type of watches and your favorites. Here is my list but obviously there are issues so haven’t bought any of them yet.
1.Zenith Defy skeleton. I love the shape, the bracelet, the brand, the movement, size, presence of date however its a shame the visibility of moving parts is very limited and the dial is hard to read.
2. Glasshutte panoinverse: beautiful watch from brand I adore. And that decorated balance bridge is mesmerizing to look at. Problem is its too dressy. Cant see wearing it every day
3. Zenith El primero with open balance: the non chronograph version with a big date and moonphase has the dial I like but not a fan of case shape and lug design. I like more restrained, German style design with edges and short downsloping lugs like Glasshutte has.
4. Ulysse Nardin marine tourbillon: love the blue enamel version. Unfortunately 43 mm is too big on my wrist and no date is disappointing. This brand is so underrated. Own dual time with black dial, still cant believe I paid just 5k for it (retail around 9k).
Anyway. Please share some thoughts.
Very nice! Thanks for sharing.
Very nice watch, however I don't like the colour of the strap. Does it match the dial? I also think the mesh bracelet is absolutely not for that kind of watches, although I have it on some of my other pieces. Nice video, maybe you could advise the measurements (lug size, lug to lug, thickness, strap at buckle...) Negative the case back, I agree, and the price, it is about 400-500 € too expensive.
I like ur reviews but in the future pls give details about the clasps . It’s as important as the bezel . I hate pressed metal like my dive extension on my longines and my tag Heuer , my oris has by far the best clasp and bracelet in my modest collection . Thanks in advance and greets from belgium .
Where did you get the mesh bracelet from I need 1 thank you 😊???
Love that half smeer application
I'm on the point of buying one of these and it's very discouraging as you keep on reminding me of the bath I'm going to take if/when I choose to sell it.
30m WR is a disappointment.
'Biscuit tinny' profile, not a fan.
40mm? Would have preferred 38; whatever.
No display back? Oh dear.
In other words this watch is selling on virtually the dial and hands alone.
Longines have turned a potential no-brainer into real struggle for someone on a budget.
Would love to see a comparison between this and the Tissot Heritage Petit Seconde. Which is a better watch if you ask me.
I like Tissot, but not even close. The balance of the sub-second dial is lovely here with the contoured "Automatic" and it doesn't obscure the "6" like the Tissot does, it has those blued hands, an elegant logo font, applied index pips, and a restraint with the every other hour numbering. Also the Longines is 4hz vs. 2.5hz with only slightly less power reserve. The bronze dial. That Tissot can't touch it.
Bruce, lovely watch. How would you compare this to the Nomos offerings, as it kind of plays on that aesthetic?
It's one of the best looking watch. Should I go for Nomos or this ?
That’s a good question. I likely would prefer Nomos. Independent instead of Swatchgroup. Glashütte instead of Switzerland (more special to me). Small manufacturer. In-house movement. Quality and price at the same level, I assume.
Whichever you feel you would enjoy more! They are both awesome watches
Hi Bruce, Ivappreciate your reviews- they the war er are - Never sophisticated - where the hell you get your millsnaise bracelets- please Tell me ;)
Nice-looking watch. I have a question about the Swatch group. What is the point of buying so many companies that are in the same category? Seiko and Orient are owned by the same company etc. Is the goal to dominate a segment of the market, or are they just competing with themselves? It reminds me of GMC, and we know how that went.
Big fan of Longines, except for one thing - their abysmal 30m water resistance rating.
Anybody know what bracelet is that?
Hi Bruce. Great video. Any chance of you popping out the case back like you did on the SuperOcean? Cheers
Sorry I would have but I've already sold and shipped it to it's new owner
Beautiful watch!
Was this really 1k USD? It's almost 2 now
such a nice watch ruined by the hour hand being basically the same length as the minute hand
Very nice, I'm just not a small seconds kinda of guy.
Where you get the milanese bracelet for this?
Good looking watch, love the classic style. Have you covered any Dan Henry watches? The printing done on those dials seems very well done for the price. Particularly the Longines reminds me a little bit of the Dan Henry 1947.
I haven't featured a dan Henry. I'm sure it will happen at some point 😊
Prefer the sector dial classic for a wee bit more
Could you recommend your German Milanese mesh bracelet? Excellent content
kool watch,I do own one of this brand (hydroconquest)and find it to be a great value with a brand that stands on its own. When you make a suggestion like the caseback does that suggestion ever reach the suits that make these things possible ? It was a great idea !
I doubt anyone from longines watches my content lol
May I ask where did you get that German made mesh bracelet? :)
holbensfinewatchbands.com
Way too big with a 40 mm case diameter, that empty dial looks ridiculous.
It would have been such a lovely watch at 36 mm or so. I'm so sick of oversize watches.
Agreed on all points.
Longines or Tag ?
I think Longines doesn't produce their in-house movements. I would prefer the Oris Aquis in this case.
Roy Mason Oris Aquid uses Sellita movement.
Tissot's version has a beautiful caseback display. May even look better than the front too.
🤩
I don't mean to rain on your parade...but "One of the Top $1000 watches" is concerning when it initially cost over $1800....if it was truly superb, would one expect that the value should be increasing instead of approaching half price? Asking for a friend...a friend that wears a 214270.
Unfortunately Longines fucked up the size...same like on other reissues. Think of the beautiful big eye chrono, which I really wanted until I've seen its dimension in real life...40 mm is too large for this piece, especially since there's lot of dial surface. Also the proportion of the sub dial size to the overall size isnt right in my view. Longines has great models and great quality but in my view missed to make a 100 % right reissue so far.
It's no F.P. Journe 😁😁😁
Transparent case back would just ruin this watch.
Not sure why they would take such a nice-looking watch and put that hideous brown strap on it. Did the leather come from Roy Rogers or James Arness old saddle?
ok. ok.
The high polish is overdone and makes it look cheap