It's got a precision 6765. It was tuned down for this run. This GN runs 11.04 @ 124. It is a beauty with only 14,000 miles. The driver/owner is 69 years old. The turbo is a litle big for the car. It's a completely stock motor car. A 6262 or 6265 turbo would be plenty.
I agree that the turbo is a little big, but it should make room for future improvements like fully ported heads,intake,etc.. I've seen the stock heads and it's amazing that they can support the airflow to run 12's, even with boost!
you can try and say that without the turbo and the intercooler its just another piece of shit Buick but Regals were winning king of the hill at race tracks with stock motors long before the grand national came around.
It's got a precision 6765. It was tuned down for this run. This GN runs 11.04 @ 124. It is a beauty with only 14,000 miles. The driver/owner is 69 years old. The turbo is a litle big for the car. It's a completely stock motor car. A 6262 or 6265 turbo would be plenty.
One of my favorites
I agree that the turbo is a little big, but it should make room for future improvements like fully ported heads,intake,etc.. I've seen the stock heads and it's amazing that they can support the airflow to run 12's, even with boost!
@grayham87 I'm not sure, it's not my car. It's gorgeous, I wouldn't mind owning one.
wats the big cloud of smoke rising in the back
ohhh thanks
you can try and say that without the turbo and the intercooler its just another piece of shit Buick but Regals were winning king of the hill at race tracks with stock motors long before the grand national came around.
I think it was a Thunderbird.
a suped up Regal, eh.
im gonna get a precision 6262 or a te-60…survey says…...
what car was he racing
my bad that was ta the beginning
ohhhh
It's a nuclear power plant.
What is your setup?
i wanna ride it shit
looks to me like a Pontiac firebird trans am