Видео

Greatest post-apostolic saint ever.

One of the Greatest Church Fathers!

thank you. great interview

Ahhhh… how the turntables

Dear Adam, I believe it is wrong to portray Hesychasm as non-scriptural. The Jesus Prayer is clearly from Philippians 2:6-11, Luke 1:31-35, and Luke 18:9-14.

When he said in the Catholic tradition, you could never be certain of your salvation….that just floors me.

For those who don’t under stand 1st one is Marco and the 2nd one is polo

Furnace and crafting table: hold my beer

Let me guess bigmac and broccoli

Jesus and god🏁

No the best duo ever is fries and ice cream

Woah woah woah wait a second this the best duo: Cristiano Ronaldo and Messi

Don't forgot Bread×Milo

Bros jawline is😂

Me and Bro on the game is better

GREATEST TRIO INCOMING Billie Joe Armstrong: Exeptional guitarist/vocalist with masterful writing skills. Mike Dirt: Genuinely has some of the best Basslines in all of punk music and is an amazing backing vocalist. Tré Cool: Top Tier drummer who is also an incredibly funny guy (not to mention he wrote All By Myself)

Rome still going for the gold.

Best duo ever

Denial, in the strict sense, involves consciously rejecting something that one knows or acknowledges to exist. So, if a person is convinced that something doesn't exist and refuses to accept evidence to the contrary, that would be a rejection or rejection of evidence rather than denial. In denial, there’s typically a conflict between what is known or perceived and the refusal to accept it, often due to emotional, psychological, or defensive reasons. In the case of someone who is convinced something doesn't exist but refuses to consider evidence, they are not technically denying its existence in the psychological sense. Instead, they are closed off to reconsidering their beliefs or committed to a certain viewpoint, even in the face of contrary evidence. This might be better described as belief persistence or cognitive rigidity rather than denial. So, to clarify: Denial involves rejecting something known or perceived to be true. Rejection or refusal to accept evidence occurs when someone is convinced something doesn't exist, but they are unwilling to alter their belief regardless of new information. A balanced treatment of this difficult topic would be a debate between a revisionist (Germar Rudolf ?) and Jacob.

lose this crown

The eastern church only predates the Anglican church by century and that simply has to with everything beginning in Jerusalem and spreadimg out from there.The AC was actually autonomous from Rome until the of the 6th century . The RC and the EO are defective. classical Anglicanism is the best expression of the faith inspite of apostasy of western contemporary AC. We have much in common with the confessional Lutherans.

Stellar guest.

I was gonna say the mcdonalds ice cream & fries lol

Me but I only have the pocket edition

Repent and trust in Jesus you will be saved

close your church and become catholic

#1 😔

Another very well done video presentation from sean Luke. My only push back though is that Christian nationalism is not a monothic view. There are different views of Christian nationalism where as sean luke seems to concentrating on just one view which I would call Christian autocracy. I do have a concern of growing movement amongst some Christians toward a Christian autocracy. History has shown that this was bloody and violent disaster and in the long term turns people off to the gospel. It is not a Christian virtue to use coercive power against someone solely because they hold non-christian beliefs. We must trust in the power of the Holy spirit to persuade the unconverted, not the power of any state. Conversely, I do believe that gov't is to constrained evil but even that is not exhaustive and should not be exhaustive. For example , we outlaw killing and stealing but we don't outlaw lying or using God's name in vain. That is not inconsistency, there is good sound reasons what govt should and should not do even in the restraint of evil. While all violations of God's commandments are indeed sin , not all violations are crimes nor should they be crimes.

GREATEST TRIO INCOMING: JESUS: The Alpha and Omega, the first and the last GOD: The creator of everything, no beginning yet no end HOLY SPIRIT: Leader of the path to heaven, a bird but still strong!💪

*John Calvin and Cranmer entered in the chat 🗣️🔥🦅

Knew what it was gonna be before I clicked on the vid lol

Lutheran big three: Luther, Chemnitz and Gerhard! 💪

If there is a woke right, it’s exactly Doug Wilson, James Lindsay, Konstantin Krisin, because while they denounce identity politics for Whites, they fully embrace it for Jews. FYI Judaism is a hegemonic global ancestral supremacist cult which views all other peoples as equal to Canaanite slaves. Their god told them to practice predatory usury and pedophilia. You do not worship the same god, be sure of that, and you needn’t make a fool of yourself trying to ingratiate yourself to the Jew World Order, which they detail in their teachings. Not like I’m making it up, it’s in the bloody Talmud.

Sad what happened to Melanchton after Luthers death

Trio: includes John Calvin. Alternate duo: Jewel and Hooker. 😊

Speaking of Carl Trueman, I’d love for you to have him on the show to talk about Protestantism as well as other subjects like this.

Great interview.

Quite the morbid topic

James White has been dealing with a lot of these antisemitic people recently. "Ostensibly Reformed" he calls them. They babble on and on about Christian nationalism and the crusades as if they wouldn't've been subjected to them by the pope and his papists. It's sad and very frustrating when supposedly conservative people are sharing the same or similar perspectives of the maniacs on the left.

Wait till Jordan Cooper sees this lol

Sad thing is that they didn’t go to purgatory… They went to go burn with Tetzel. Wolf in sheep’s clothing…

Contra Mundum has a decent video from a week and a half ago talking about why the term “woke right” is silly. Edit: Their recent video on James Lindsay goes into the this as well if people want more material on the subject.

“For example”

Didn’t a prominent TLM Bishop deny the existence of gas chambers?

Did he just admit that the filming of Auschwitz was a reenactment?

🤦‍♂️

Straight off the bat he says historians can't agree on who what or how the orders were given and admits there is no documentary evidence for the Holocaust. People should really seek out the other side of the story. They'll find out stunning things like in the internal communications of the camp commanders there is only discussion of how to decrease the death rate in the camps not increase it, the mathematical infeasibility of cremating so many bodies, the Red Cross actually visited the camps and kept records of the total population and how many died.

You invite an obvious homosexual on to tell Christians what to think about a very important historical topic. Nothing odd about that at all.

On the last question: Those who deny the Holocaust can not have any reasonable faith in the historicisity of Jesus's birth, life, death, and resurrection.

frfr