Видео

Does the peaking color focus works when using manual adapters?

If you want a realy good one get a Pentax Super Multi Coated takumar.135mm

Oh it was terrible the place was like bayroot

Gorgeous images! Love the mood here!

Боке больше нравится с майер, цейс этот слишком дорогой проще купить юпитер 37а сильно дешевле при тех же показателях

A test /review in the woods is always an very very worse test…..

32 è l'apertura minima, non massima, è la massima chiusura per intenderci.

What about A.Schacht Ulm Travenon 135 mm f 4.5?

I think you were using a Schacht lens that had a foggy haze or another optical problem. At F5.6 and below it should be showing minor CA distortions and softness. At F8 and above and it should be similar to the CZJ lens in terms of sharpness. The foggy haze in your results is not a feature of the Schacht lens.

1963 was worse! Now it's back last night Tuesday 13/12/22 it was -7 C

“ Deft “ of field ??? Surely you mean Depth 😁

Carl Zeiss win!!

Oh, and the Meyer Optik also does not have a Magenta cast to it - this may be a result of ageing of the coating in the Zeiss. We will never know, of course ;)

Although there is not much in it, I do believe that in every case tje Meyer Optik Gorlitz is beter than the Zeiss - the Contrast is better, the Sharpness is just marginally better, the detail in the tree is better at stopped down apertures, and the lack of starburst defect is of course better corrected. Of all these things the most important is the contrast. With lens design, the sharpness is limited by the maximum aperture of the lens. This is perhaps why the f2.8 lens beats the f3.5. I also prefer the classic style of the Gorlitz Zebra - I believe they were first to make lenses in the Zebra style. The Zebra style indicates high-contrast, which was even more important with film camera photography as it was so much harder to correc in post process work. A very detailed analysis - thank you for this great contribution to RUclips.

Now you have 124 views 😊

I have this lens as it was for the Praktina Mount, so I got the adapter for the Fuji X mount, and that the results were most impressive, and the contrast, and colors were natural. Great lens in both Film, and Digital. I am getting more appreciated to German Optics, wish that these companies were still in business - Yes names like Zeiss, and Leitz are familiar today , But there were other Companies from as from 1900's to 1950's that were more to the Cinema as they did for still shooting, and you have to look very carefully, and hard to find them... Good Video..

This is no way to do a lens review comparison. Get a grip and go out doors.

Sorry but what a lousy video.

The Schacht has haze, probably just the front element, easy fixed and worth restoring this 60s glass.

Wow, very nice shots

Hi . Your upload the closest to the lens I have. One snag as I have an e mount Sony. I'm stuck with which adapter to use. Any suggestions ?. Some nice lens flares there and I love the scenery.

Great test !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Zeiss lens is made in Eastern Germany =DDR = GDR. Schacht lens is made Western Germany = BRD. ' The family name is Zeiss and the first name is Carl. The family name is Schacht and the first name is Albert. Mr. Schacht used to be an employee at the Zeiss works. There is also a Zeiss works in the town OBERKOCHEN in Western Germany. The two Zeiss plants are one today.

During the Cold war the Carl Zeiss lenses which were made in Jena in DDR had been sold in the Capitalist part of the world by the simple brand name "AUS JENA" or "CZ" or "JENA T". "JENA T" means Carl Zeiss Tessar lens.

Nice collection ! Vivitar is the brand name of Ponder & Best founded in Santa Monica, California, U.S.A. Vivitar lenses, 2x teleconverters, macroconverters, macrobellows, electronic flash, 35 mm cameras. 8 mm cine cameras and filters are made by different Japanese factories. World famous are the Series 1 lenses.

Great collection you got there

Jena J as yeeey it is name of the city :)

Canon has more contras so it looks sharped.

Sharper sharper sharper ;)

Yeah i found this out too! In live view i saw my Domiplan was performing incredibly well and actually trounced the equivalent canon lens. I use it as my every day glass, i never miss focus anymore

Isco Gottingen 1:4.5/50 Enlarger lens at F8 and Sony a6000

ive got a 135mm Carl Zeiss Jena lens from 1927, great lens. And really rare now you just dont see any of the 20's lenses and basically as soon as the nazis came to power just 20,000 were made a year at best. Through till the end of the war.

Actually, this to lenses has no capability of doing macro. the macro ting is a joke the only way to get close focus is to reverse those lines

PENTAX IS 1st. TOKINA 2nd. PENTAX IS LESS CONTRASTY. TOKINA HA A LOT CONTRAS.

Super-Kiptyar Projector lens 0:24 1:44 Eumig Austragon 0:27 Tokina AF 35-70mm 0:28 1:37 SMC Pentax-F 35-70 Lydith 30 1:06 Leica Elmar 1:11 1:28 Sony 30mm Macro 1:16 Experimental lens 1:33 Zeiss 2:03

I do like Minolta 50mm AF but it can focus close, so my lens of choice is Meyer Optik Gorlitz 50mm

This Is A lens test that I like Minolta AF 50mm 1.7 for blurry backgrounds. Problems with this lens that is not working in Af setting and so it cant focus close. So I think I just Yous Pentacon Electric 50mm 1.8 or Isco, Possibly Zeiss Jena or Hellios

nice channel

I adapt the 135mm f/2.8 Orestor to my Sony A6500 with a Kipon focal reducer which ends up as a 135mm f/2.0 lens with virtually no crop factor to consider,

I'm so sad I let my MOG 2.8:135 get away - I won one in auction but was having financial issues. It was beautiful! The guy tried to work with me for a really really long time but when my time ran out I didn't see his message :(

Forgot Canon 50mm 1.8 STM

The Oreston seems much sharper in all images.

So this what I am thinking maybe I am wrong. I think that lenses on PRAKTICA point and shoot cameras are actually Myer Optics. Meyer optic marge to Pentacon. This interesting that there is a stamp on thous point and shoot cameras ''Pentacon Germany" I am really thinking Those optics are made in Germany, even though a sticker on the camera states made in china.

Since the 1990s, binoculars and compact cameras bear the brand name PRAKTICA. In 2001, the production of SLR cameras Praktika was discontinued. Since 2002 there are digital cameras of the brand Praktica, 2004 was started with the product line Luxmedia. Optics are also produced for Polaroid.

1989 With the collapse of communism and the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Pentacon and Carl Zeiss partnership ended. Following this the Schneider lens group invested heavily in Pentacon, helping them to continue to manufacture PRAKTICA cameras.

1985 Pentacon merged with Carl Zeiss Jena and introduced a range of modern sports cameras and binoculars

Post from eBay on14 Feb 2008 Praktica DC Slim 5 Digital Camera I have had loads of problems with this camera not working. I bought one in November 2007 and I am now just about to send it back for a second time to Praktica. Do not buy as very poor quality camera!

The Canon IXUS L-1 is a compact APS film camera, introduced by Canon in September 1997; one of the simpler IXUS APS cameras. It has a collapsible, fixed length 26mm f2.8 lens (35mm equivalent of a fairly wide 33mm). The IXUS L-1 name was used in Europe; in America, it was called the ELPH Jr, and in Japan, IXY 310. It was available in silver or black finish.

The Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor 135 mm f2.8 was manufactured by the Meyer company in Dresden (GDR) in the 1960 - 70s. After the merging of several companies and the foundation of the VEB Pentacon. Meyer-Optik Görlitz Orestor 135 mm f2.8 is 5 element in 4 groups and not multi-coated. Some suggest that Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 even more sharpener. Possibly Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 is 5 element in 4 groups.

Possibly Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f3.5 is 5 element in 4 groups.

The Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 lens was included in Praktica camera bundles of the 1970s as the telephoto. The Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 is 4 element lens. More optical faults you try to correct in a lens, the more lens elements you need. Old lens designs were often limited to a few lens elements because a lack of sufficient coatings caused large light losses. Light is reflected/lost for every lens element when light passing from both sides of the lens element. If the glass reflects 5% of the light, in a 4 lens element design, 66% of the light got through, compared to a multi-coated lens with 1% reflection, 92%. To build a lens for the same purpose with 6 elements, that would lose 54%. Therefore, older lenses tend to have fewer elements. It also labeled as a Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm Sonnar, or CSJ 135.