Видео

The narration voice is really hard to understand, and really takes away from the quality of the piece.

rearding from Wikipedia

جايه مع الضمان ؟ وأهم حاجة خدمة بعد البيع عشان مش هاتعرف تفك فيها مسمار !!!

巴基斯坦到中国的爱

The French have always had excellent engineers, but they cannot produce enough to be a great power.

Thank you for this video, absolutely fantastic.

Interesting what are thinking US Citisens on this count ? , ... And The Volume of the Chinese in the USA universities ........

It's a piece of scraps.

The hull is made of a tin can..😅

LRMP have to search vast sea for Sub detection. PAKISTAN

NICE PAINT FINISH ON THOSE SUBMARINES. HELPS TO SAVE BATTERIES.

😍♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

Full transfer of technology provides I think deal final latest technology provides

Bravo China.👍

Supercavitatingisticexpialidocious!

厉害了，这艘船看上去好威武啊，希望我国也能有这种级别的驱逐舰

Bro is reading outta Wikipedia 💀

Nema mesto macedonia serbia mesto donesim 4 mira da prati albanis tursko nema more

The audio and narration in this video are absolutely horrible. The vocal has an unnatural spike at 240hz to 300hz, masking much of what's being said. Also the inflections and emphasis of the narrators voice is completely baffling for an English language video. The voice is meek and monotone. The production is cheap, careless, and distorted. All of this could have been remedied in post production to some extent, but its the choice of narrator, trimming the input sensitivity of the vocal microphone, and equalization on the channel strip that would have made the difference. Unfortunately, and this is no fault of the narrator, but understanding the topic of which you're narrating is of obvious importance, when making an informational and educational video. I was really looking forward to the information in this video. So disappointed...

Made in china😊😊😊😊

A CAATSA SUBMARINE. STUPID!

Having read about the problematic development of torpedoes during WW2 I wouldn't worry about these things until they are shown to work in combat situations. It's one thing to develop something in controlled environments - another thing entirely to use them when under hostile conditions. I'm not saying they won't work, but history does have a knack of repeating itself.

What accent she's speaking? Sounds great.

🫣 maybe our Dutch Navy will buy 4......not our first choice...but politics.Holland prefers the A26 Saab/ Damen much better quality. On the end the Barracuda will cost us way more tax money..for sure!

Katar, for having only 3 million people have a very strong navy!

Why don't they put external turbines like on airplanes? Unless they are vulnerable to any hit against the ship!

Esse sistema é mais econômico?

highly unstable and unreliable design of supercavitation torpedo. when i look the design. it might simply work when the is no wave and under current. and when it reaches turning angle it will drastically slow down or go out direction. it can't be done by just designing the torpedo head. it might be possible in the coming future.

Kiss from algeria

Something you forgot: Iranian fast ships have missiles that can fires 50 km away while they are sailing to the attack! Also the have trophy system too!!! Also how about ground to sea missilery?

What a shame if it is unable to float. I think Brazilians can do better. No? Just watch Embraer airplanes.

Your voice is terrible mam! It's hurting in my ears.. God bless you 🙏🏻

Combined diesel electric through azipod motors is the best way.

U.s. Navy's codag system on lcs ships proved over complicated and incapable of clutching properly big waste of money. Should have been proof of concepts first.

One word ........... *Tofu*

projection of power is always aimed for evil intent, expansionism at oppressing the weak with out respect to international law because it depends on its might like hitler and russian strongmen.

Hello Algeria, Hello Turkey, see you soon 😎 Kiss from France.

thanks for informative video👍🏻 bread

Um. Just a question, but when exactly did Naval Postova (ovich?) replace Jane's? I've BEEN in Russia, people. Lived there for a few years. They ARE the paper "supremacy" idiots you hope they are. New cool toys, when the truth is they are failing because of other things than their really neat new toys, all 8 or 9 of them. Whip out that spiffy tank, Russia. Since it's going to revolutionize armored warfare and over run ALL your enemies in moments. You might want to publicize this in Ukraine, since they did not get the memo...

Has anyone mentioned the guidance system? Oh, let's use the missile terminus systems Russia uses as an example? If they fired a missile with whatever munition aboard at oh, let's say Las Vegas? They would be supremely lucky if they hit Nevada anywhere. Why? Russian GPS relies on 6 satellites. Total. US GPS uses...oh, that's right. 248 satellites. Bit less likely to jam, what?

It can only fire on a straight line. It very hard to steer.

Excellent video. Precise. Thanks for sharing.

Well done China powerful Carrier. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯❤❤

Hindi kintab ang electonic technology nasa missile yan at propulsion design at anti ballistic weapons.

cina😂

MODERNIZED AND BUY MORE MODERN ASSETS TO THE ARM FORCES PHILIPPINES - SPAIN.............GOD BLESS GOOD LUCK TO ALL....💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

Looks quite small around 20.000 tonnes carry around 20 helicopters 500 troops. China always lies about tonnage and size .

This is the Torpedo the sunk the Kursk.

Deberia ser mas rapido.

Surely these torpedos could be launched via a smaller craft that is launched from the mother craft. As to prevent the mother crafts location being found out by their enemy. Even a torpedo could be floated to the surface to be activated remotely or via a timer to launch at a set time and thus protect the mother craft from enemy finding their location.