Видео

Player: I’d like to change my class from Swashbuckler, to Unbuckl- GM: NO! Player: But they’re going to Enjoy the Show! GM: Rocks fall. Rocks fall on the whole stage.

My very first Swashbuckler was a Varisian Battledancer who dual wielded 2 battle fans. Tango was one of my inspirations for him (along with eastern European Cossack folk/sword dancing). There are a bunch of things in this video that caught my eye for him.

Hee hee great thanks! I appreciate you being here, too. :)

@@DargorV LOL oh I'm sorry. ☹️ Should I try to chill the fuck out more?

@@rainraven9881 Yeah they feel familiar to me too.

Y'know, that seemed the case when I was reading it but I know Foxes are that way so I thought I was just misremembering. And yeah I do like that Catfolk and Kholo have some things in common.

Great! Yeah it seemed like important stuff to make characters right fuckin' now.

The Alchemist dedication is also amazing. But yes I agree with you overall. Oracle is best as an Archetype and it's quite useful.

Hahhahah yeah it's a perfect image for this.

Omg yes. Kermit D Piggy.

@@amdrewmiller9479 weirdly, my first thought was to make a Squire Frog Swashbuckler who was chasing down a magus… Edit: Maybe he tag-teams with a young Human Fighter, his childhood friend an Inventor and Ranger, a friendly Automaton, and an Animal Instinct Barbarian. Maybe the Fighter could have the *Chrono*skimmer archetype…

Yeah that's sad though.

I love you and your replies AND your arguments. The demon thing sort of makes sense anyway because some cultures used to believe that Hyenas were toxic and monstrous and demons... literally. Some believed they were Jinn, malevolent spirits of fire and smoke who torment people. Probably because they ambush people and then giggle. Fucking creepy as hell. So as messed up as WOTC is, I can see them likening Gnolls (hyena-people) to actual demons. ...and I accept your shame. I did not read through all the heritages. Dammit. Oversight. :P I actually like the temporary flight as well. Like instead of gaining flight for 1 minute, being able to "double-jump" instead is pretty neat.

@@WisdomCheck, Sure, some cultures didn't like hyenas eating their kids... just like some cultures didn't like tigers eating their kids, lol. Ever heard of a Bouda? That, IIRC, is the same as a "werehyena"... or maybe closer to the Skinwalkers of NA Native lore. *Shrugs* Still, better than here's a gnoll, kill it. It's the most evil thing in the world...except, maybe, for demons. WotS's idea of them sort of makes sense... except the Lore of them (including their origin story) kept changing... Basic D&D they were the joke that they were gnome-troll hybrids hence their name is just half of gnome and half of troll. It was in AD&D that they became an anthropomorphic hyena... who worship some Demon Prince out of fear... but they are, like their D&D counterparts, vicious, lazy, scavengers, who hate everyone. But, they are people, just victims of their culture. AD&D 2e and D&D 3/3.5e make it clear they are people, though in 3/3.5e their size is reduced to medium and they mostly don't care about the Demon Prince, who has special demon-gnoll hybrids as priests... These gnolls are lazy, vicious, equal-opportunity carnivores who like to entertain themselves with the screams of their dinner as they eat it/them alive. However, prolonged exposure to other cultures will tamper their worst instincts and desires and they can become the best friend any wizard would want. In 4e, Gnolls were hyena's fed by the Demon Lord which caused them to transform into his favourite worshipers. This makes them very rabid followers of his going as far as sending slaves to his realm for his use. In 5e, the twist was packs of hyena's followed in the Demon Lord's wake, turning into the much beloved gnolls and for new gnolls to be born, packs of hyenas need to gorge on the flesh of the victims... when a hyena eats too much, new gnolls burst from the hyena's belly. This makes gnolls fiends in all senses of the word. They are irredeemable monsters who exist for the PCs to slay without thinking if unaliving an entire species is a bad thing. :/ Paizo's Kholo, share a similar origin story... being children of a Demon Lord (Lamashtu). But, just because they are her children doesn't make them demons or that they are an unthinking plague on society. Paizo spent the time looking at Gnoll culture and tried to explain why Kholo do the things they do with nuance. Yes, they are slave masters, raiders, cannibals, who are prone to being lazy and violent, but they are capable of great feats of compassion too. *Shrugs* Paizo's Kholo are based entirely on 3/3.5e's version of Gnoll... and I much appreciate _that_ then wtf WotS was thinking for 4e and 5e. :/

I think that depends on your group. My group really doesn't do "preparation" or "scouting" per se, so it's a true benefit to have +1. For your group though, it totally makes sense. I with my group tried to think that far ahead lol.

Yes! I agree. I think it should be a free language. Like it's natural for you. Ancestral memory.

Holy shit fuck. Dual Weapon Warrior too.

They... do. ATTRIBUTE BOOSTS Dexterity Charisma Free ATTRIBUTE FLAW Wisdom

@@WisdomCheck but whhhhhy? I feel like they should get dex, wis, other, and con flaw... or something like that. You're telling me cats are inherently bad at hunting? Makes no sense.

@@njsoapdish Right. And make foolish choices? I think cats err on the side of terror which keeps them alive. Wisdom doesn't actually make any sense at all. I do like the Con idea because of how fragile feline health really is, but I think that would affect all players pretty intensely and they wouldn't want to change it to that.

@@WisdomCheck there are currently 5 ancestries with a con flaw including popular ones like elves and kobolds as well as the merfolk, which just came out. I'm pretty sure the wisdom flaw was a typo/error and that won't admit it.

@@njsoapdish oh jeez... I thought they were probably others with con flaws. I don't use the basic flaws they come with or the ability boosts. I don't know if it's a typo or not but yeah I don't think they're going to change it now.

Hell yeah! I like them much more after this rework. I like the idea of actually playing one or just making a few builds with them.

HELL YEAH! As soon as I saw Capybara I was like "Awaken that shit!"

Oh hells yes. I love that they FINALLY did it!

Sorry to say, I'm almost positive it won't stop. It's a running gag at this point.

Pftoo

Pfft-Two, to you too.

I am sorry for your loss

Hahaha I care and understand. They won't let me.

Did not know that. Thank you!

DUDE! Thafuq? How did I not know that?! Thank you very much for your input. Pinning this.

Hahahah yeah agreed. I still like Gnaw though and see no reason to disallow it. But yes the natural attack means a lot.

Hells yes!

Nature's magazine

Hahahhahah love it. Nice mental image.

Yeah probably not. YES WHY DIDN'T FROGS GET MORE LEAP ABILITIES BEFORE?! Much better. I'm excited about them now.

WOO-HAW!

YUP! Finally.

I have debated this with a colleague of mine at length. It turns out that Monk has a lot of similar feats so you'd have no reason to take both. Ranger has some benefits, but surprisingly not a lot of synergy. Fighter is good (of course) for the higher bonus to hit and the large number of feats, but I suggest you look into Swashbuckler (Gymnast) and if you don't like the synergy I would choose Fighter. Tumble Through and Opportune Riposte are both very useful for a Clawdancer. But don't take my word for it; investigate Swashbuckler and see if you like the built. I'll be releasing a Remastered Swashbuckler in a couple of days as well and it may be useful for you. ;)

@@WisdomCheck I did a monk and barbarian work up. Monk seemed to be the better choice. I'll make a swashbuckler build next. Thanks!

@@Quetzelkoa Already in the works, my friend. 😁👍

Yes but it comes with 5 basic abilities! But yeah it's expensive....

I don't think anything has been said about removing it and we're supposed to be able to use everything from pre-remaster so yeah! I'd say you're good to just keep using it and that they see no reason to update it. Looking at it closely, the terms it uses were carried over directly from pre-remaster (Quick Alchemy) so there'd be no reason to update it. Play on!

@@WisdomCheck Hi Jake. You are now my favorite PF2 youtuber, appreciate your dedication a lot. About Lab Assistant and Quick Alchemy - what real options does it give to familiar? It could create temporary potions from VV and VV bombs? What could it do with VV bombs - throw it, drop it, give it to somebody?

I'm grateful to hear that. I appreciate you being here. :) Yeah I see your point. Either your familiar takes 1 action on their own because they have Independent or you use an action to give them 2 actions; they could spend 1 action using Quick Alchemy with Independent and... you have to spend an action to get it from them. Or you could spend 1 action to give the Familiar 2 actions and it could use Quick Alchemy and ...hand you an elixir? That's a little silly. They could use 2 actions from you to Create a Bomb and ...not throw it because they can't make attacks. Hand it to you? They could use 2 actions from you to Create an Elixir and ...hand it to someone in the square next to you? They could use 2 actions from you to Create a Mutagen and ...drop it? Wow actually this is bugging me. I'm a bit stumped.

Just a cool new picture. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hell yeah I love it too. It's going to fit so many niches and fill so many gaps in people's builds. It was my pleasure to serve. :)

Dude, I LOVE this system. My complaints about a few changes notwithstanding, I love it. And I see no reason to stop loving it. I've also thought more about the Oracle and while I still dislike some of the changes, I'm thinking about releasing an update for that video stating my current, more balanced stance.

5 HP per level in legacy.

Yeah same as before.

The Witch gets it too. It's legacy content that wasn't revised or specifically removed.