- Видео 68
- Просмотров 364 874
wod-science
Добавлен 25 май 2023
Evidence-based fitness and nutrition made accessible for everyone.
The Hidden Downside of Always Training Too HARD (Science Explained)
💪 JOIN or TRAINING Community (7-day FREE trial) - pxl.to/plans_94
🗣️ Looking for individual training advice? - pxl.to/consult_94
👕 MERCH (new) - pxl.to/merch_94
Check out www.wod-science.com/ for FREE education and much more!
-
Recovering quickly between short bursts of intense effort is essential for doing well in high-intensity sports like CrossFit.
In this video, I break down how the phosphocreatine system helps us recover energy. I will also explain why training at lower intensities can improve oxygen delivery and speed up ATP recycling right after hard exercise, which boosts phosphocreatine recovery and overall performance.
-
If you enjoyed this one, do not forget to subscribe www.youtube.co...
🗣️ Looking for individual training advice? - pxl.to/consult_94
👕 MERCH (new) - pxl.to/merch_94
Check out www.wod-science.com/ for FREE education and much more!
-
Recovering quickly between short bursts of intense effort is essential for doing well in high-intensity sports like CrossFit.
In this video, I break down how the phosphocreatine system helps us recover energy. I will also explain why training at lower intensities can improve oxygen delivery and speed up ATP recycling right after hard exercise, which boosts phosphocreatine recovery and overall performance.
-
If you enjoyed this one, do not forget to subscribe www.youtube.co...
Просмотров: 4 255
Видео
Is CrossFit Missing Something? NEW RESEARCH on Intensity vs. Volume explained
Просмотров 9 тыс.День назад
💪 JOIN or TRAINING Community (7-day FREE trial) - pxl.to/Training_Plans93 🗣️ Looking for individual training advice? - pxl.to/consulting_93 👕 MERCH (new) - pxl.to/merch_93 Check out www.wod-science.com/ for FREE blogs and much more - In this video, I talk about a new study that looked at how different types of workouts (like low, steady exercises, high-intensity intervals, and sprints) affect d...
So YouTube is Funding Science now?
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.21 день назад
🗣️ Looking for individual training advice? - pxl.to/consulting91 👕 MERCH (new) - pxl.to/merch91 💪 JOIN ourTRAINING Community (7-day FREE trial) - pxl.to/trainingplans91 - In this video I lay out why social media can change the way we fund, conduct and communicate science. A change that is much needed… - If you enjoyed this one, do not forget to subscribe www.youtube.com/@wod-science www.wod-sci...
6 Tips to Master HYROX Racing as an Endurance Athlete
Просмотров 2 тыс.Месяц назад
🗣️ BOOK a 1:1 Consultation - pxl.to/consulting_90 👕 MERCH (new) - pxl.to/merch90 💪 Our training plans (7-day FREE trial) - pxl.to/ALL_trainingplans_90 🏋️♂️ JOIN our Fitness seminar (only 5 / 25 spots available) - pxl.to/fitnessseminar_90 www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - In this video, I offer a full guide on transitioning from specialized en...
Why HYBRID Athletes Can’t Specialize (a scientific perspective)
Просмотров 4,7 тыс.Месяц назад
🏋️♂️ JOIN our Fitness seminar (only 6 / 25 spots available) - pxl.to/fitnessseminar88 . 💦 The ZONE 2 project (sign-up before Sept. 30th) - pxl.to/zone2_88 . 👕 MERCH (new): pxl.to/merch88 . 💪 Our training plans (7-day FREE trial) - pxl.to/trainingplans_88 www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - Hybrid training is a new, in some way controversial, me...
Did We Just WIN a CrossFit Competition!?
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.Месяц назад
▶️ Train with us! pxl.to/programs87 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ Check out www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - Let me take you behind the scenes of the Zurich Games 2024. A local CrossFit comp in the middle of one of the largest train stations in the world. I will guide you through the...
Two Tips to Stay Injury-Free in CrossFit (according to science)
Просмотров 2,6 тыс.Месяц назад
▶️ Train with us! pxl.to/TrainingPlans84 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ ADD your ANSWER to this week’s question here: pxl.to/GoogleSurvey84 ▶️ Check out www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - Injuries in high-intensity sports, such as CrossFit, are relatively common. But just how common are...
The BEST Progressive Overload Methods for Peak Performance: CrossFit vs. HYROX compared
Просмотров 5 тыс.2 месяца назад
▶️ JOIN our training programs! pxl.to/83_wod-sciencePrograms // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ ADD your ANSWER to this week’s question here: pxl.to/83_googleSurvey ▶️ Check out www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - Progressive overload is widely used in conventional sports to increase the tra...
Why Certain Muscles Shrink Even When You’re Training Hard (NEW RESEARCH)
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.2 месяца назад
▶️ Train with us! - pxl.to/82_builtbyscienceprograms // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ ADD your ANSWER to this week’s question here: pxl.to/82_googleSurvey ▶️ Check out www.wod-science.com/ for booking a 1:1 Consultation, Training Plans and FREE Blogs. - In a new study, researchers analyzed 30 muscles using MRI to measure their total volum...
THIS Device Can Measure POWER and PACING in Functional Workouts! (New Tech Review)
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.2 месяца назад
▶️ Join our Training Programs - pxl.to/builtbyscience81 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ FREE Sample weeks - pxl.to/sample81 - It's finally here-a device, and accompanying software, that can accurately estimate both POWER production and PACING during functional workouts. In this video, I'll break down how it works and show you the practic...
How Athletes Benefit from HEAT Acclimation (example 2024 CrossFit Games)
Просмотров 2,2 тыс.2 месяца назад
Rest in Peace Lazar ▶️ Join our Training Programs - pxl.to/Builtbyscience80 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ FREE Sample weeks - pxl.to/sample80 - The CrossFit Games 2024 - The Ultimate Test of Fitness With the move to Texas this year, it is going to be HOT at the CrossFit Games. Dangerously hot, actually. In this video, I explain the phy...
The Best Intervals to Boost VO2 Max? Try This 2-Step Method
Просмотров 6 тыс.2 месяца назад
▶️ A training plan to BOOST your VO2MAX - pxl.to/builtbyscienceVO2_78 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ FREE Sample weeks - pxl.to/builtbyscience_sample_78 - VO2 max is one of the most important parameters defining cardiovascular fitness. In this video I lay-out a detailed 2-step method to improve your own VO2max - Link to the TrainingPeak...
How Many Calories Do CrossFit Games Athletes Burn in One Day? (LESS than you think?)
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.3 месяца назад
▶️ Join our Training Programs - pxl.to/builtbyscience79 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ FREE Sample weeks - pxl.to/builtbyscience79SAMPLE - The CrossFit Games 2024 - The Ultimate Test of Fitness In this video, I calculate how many calories top CrossFit Games athletes burn during a typical competition day. I use data from our own study (p...
Build the Perfect Post-Workout Shake: No Marketing, Just Science
Просмотров 3,6 тыс.3 месяца назад
▶️ GET FIT & Try Out our Training Programs - pxl.to/builtbyscience77 // use the code ''BUILTBYSCIENCE15'' at check-out for 15% off (limited time available) ▶️ Design and Sell your own Programs via Strivee - pxl.to/striveevid77 // use the code “WODSCIENCE10” for 10% off of your subscription. - Feeling overwhelmed by marketing on what makes or breaks great post-workout nutrition. We feel your pai...
How to Build (extra) Muscle as a CrossFit Athlete
Просмотров 11 тыс.3 месяца назад
How to Build (extra) Muscle as a CrossFit Athlete
How To Improve CrossFit Performance 2x Faster (our NEW RESEARCH)
Просмотров 24 тыс.3 месяца назад
How To Improve CrossFit Performance 2x Faster (our NEW RESEARCH)
Sean Seale's SMART Approach to CrossFit Programming // Ep.6
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.3 месяца назад
Sean Seale's SMART Approach to CrossFit Programming // Ep.6
The BEST Carb Strategy for CrossFit and Hyrox: are you fueling right?
Просмотров 9 тыс.4 месяца назад
The BEST Carb Strategy for CrossFit and Hyrox: are you fueling right?
Do CrossFit Athletes Need ZONE 2 Training? ULTIMATE GUIDE on Methods, Dose and Benefits
Просмотров 13 тыс.4 месяца назад
Do CrossFit Athletes Need ZONE 2 Training? ULTIMATE GUIDE on Methods, Dose and Benefits
What Is Limiting Your VO2 Max? How to Detect and Improve with Interval Training
Просмотров 12 тыс.4 месяца назад
What Is Limiting Your VO2 Max? How to Detect and Improve with Interval Training
How Long to REST After an Intense CrossFit Session? (what you need to know)
Просмотров 10 тыс.4 месяца назад
How Long to REST After an Intense CrossFit Session? (what you need to know)
Why HYROX and CrossFit are Different Sports: Comparing Training and Nutrition Strategies
Просмотров 108 тыс.4 месяца назад
Why HYROX and CrossFit are Different Sports: Comparing Training and Nutrition Strategies
Use Cardio to Maximize Muscle Growth (cool study explained)
Просмотров 4 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Use Cardio to Maximize Muscle Growth (cool study explained)
The HIDDEN TRUTH About Doping: The Case for LIFETIME Bans in Athletes
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.5 месяцев назад
The HIDDEN TRUTH About Doping: The Case for LIFETIME Bans in Athletes
At a TRAINING Plateau? Try this (3 evidence-based methods for hybrid sports)
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.5 месяцев назад
At a TRAINING Plateau? Try this (3 evidence-based methods for hybrid sports)
Why Do CrossFit Athletes Have a LOW V̇O2 max? Challenging Conventional Fitness Metrics
Просмотров 17 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Why Do CrossFit Athletes Have a LOW V̇O2 max? Challenging Conventional Fitness Metrics
Why You Should WARM UP (I did an experiment)
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Why You Should WARM UP (I did an experiment)
How to IMPROVE the CrossFit QUARTERFINALS (my take)
Просмотров 4685 месяцев назад
How to IMPROVE the CrossFit QUARTERFINALS (my take)
How Blood Flow Impacts Handstand Push-Ups
Просмотров 2 тыс.6 месяцев назад
How Blood Flow Impacts Handstand Push-Ups
I m a bit lost : you wan gain mitochondria you need volume, you want make them more “efficient” you need intensity. But in the study presented 3-4 month, it was showed that CrossFitters do not need that much low intensity training. The last studies tend to prove, even if we already have a rx + level that lis intensity is mandatory?
As a former rower whereby our races are always 2km which take about 6min at elite level. Our best friend was always mileage surprisingly enough. HIIT was great for priming the nervous system but the guys who did the most mileage were always pulling the fastest times generally speaking. Rowing is very similar to crossfit in terms of how the intensity of races feel, lactic acid etc lol just wanted to add out of interest
I'm from a marathon and ultra background, mid to back of the pack and have been doing crossfit for about 18 months. I still run 3 times a week and crossfit 3 times a week. So it's hard to say if my running has helped as I started from that base.
Young crossfitters will never believe this. If you join a crossfit class 5 times a week where you do 20 minutes of a strenght part and then a metcon of 20 minutes you‘ll have big improvements at the beginning then after 3 years a plateau and after 6 years your burned out. You’re basically competing all the time. That‘s what happened to me and people I know. Instead do this: Periodize your year in terms of intensity and volume. I recovered from burnout and now I feel fresh while achieving improvement again. The original crossfit method (method) was periodized inside a week which was already better then any crossfit gym programming today. This guy Goommar get‘s it 100%. You can check every programm of every professional sport and you‘ll find these principles there too. Glassmann knew that but but obviously your modern day average crossfitter rebels against that, wants to be the hero and go all out every day. Good luck, you‘re fucked.
“You’re basically competing every day”. Powerful statement. Great thoughts, I fully agree.
@@PascalBösiger very well said. Scaling and volume control has helped me “reconcile” with the double duty schedule at our gym and avoid burnout. Feeling much better these days and improving!!
people who train endurance (zone 2) recover faster from high intensity interval training because they have more capillaries surrounding their mitochondria.
Yes. Lower intensity training - especially high volumes - drive oxygen delivery to muscle fibers. Faster ATP resynthesis after a set of high power output contractions and hence better recovery.
Long story short, when you put out Max effort wait 2 to 4 minutes between sets.
For most people this is a good strategy. Especially for building strength where you want to go to failure or near to each set.
Another informative video! I’m curious how the recovery time from phosphocreatine-dominated work compares to the recovery time from anaerobic glycolysis. In the gym, I often feel ready to lift again sooner after low-rep heavy sets than high-rep lighter sets, but tend to deliberately give myself at least as long a rest as I would for such lighter sets under the assumption that that the ATP-PC energy system needs as much (if not more) time to replenish, it’s just that at rest I don’t “feel” the fact that it’s not yet recovered because there isn’t the same metabolic acidosis-related burn that you get with higher rep stuff. Is this true, though? Or might it actually replenish faster? Also, I imagine that while endurance adaptations can accelerate phosphocreatine replenishment for the reasons you described, they can probably do even more for recovery from the fast glycolytic efforts, owing to lactate shuttling allowing some of the recovery work to be performed in non-fatigued muscle fibres. Or is that incorrect?
Gomar, when you make videos, you want to minimize visual distractions. Your position is close to a wall and your lighting is hard, casting a dark shadow on the wall. This could be a distraction for some people. To fix it, you can move away from the wall or you can use softbox lighting.
Thanks.
My cardio is my biggest enemy, so I just started a 12-week cardio block with 4 sessions in Zone 2, where the volume will increase over time, 1 session with 4x4 intervals based on FTP, and only 1 EMOM session where I will work at higher heart rates, incorporating CrossFit movements I also do some weightlifting on the evenings 3 times a week. I hate zone 2 because I find it really boring. But i am going to do it for the 12 weeks to see if I get any benefits
When you say 4x4 based on FTP I hope you are doing this higher than FTP and not at FTP. 4mins at FTP would not be sufficient to drive adaptation. If doing at FTP I’d suggest longer intervals of 10-20mins
@@CG9446-k3q yes, i will increase the percentage over time. Starting off at 105%
Well said brother, always great to see your videos. At the end of the day, all the energy systems work together and OXPHOS underpins them all. Without the mitochondria and oxygen, nothing last more than a few seconds. It's all about that zone 2 🤓
@@Upsidestrength OXPHOS? Is that the creatine phosphate system?
On strength days we should only do strength, that’s the main issue with affiliates now.
That‘s right or at least leave a period of 6 hours between strenght and cardio. But if you want to improve your strenght sessions implement sprints and/or jumping into them. For example 3 broadjumps after every set of squats and so on…
Mid of this year I found your channel. At the time I was kinda following the nutrition part in "fitness in 100 words", doing a lot of fasting, and so on. I felt a lot of fatigue many times and I didn't know why. I thought that maybe was just my nature. But after I watched your videos, mainly the ones about nutrition, I started to pay a lot more attention to my diet and give my body what it was asking for. Along with some insights from my girlfriend (triathlete) and another science-based nutrition book, I started to feel a lot of improvements, on all levels. At a certain point, I even took too much energy drinks and put a bit of extra weight, but anyway I was PRing all my loads and overall performance. So I decided to loose this extra weight while keeping the muscle (gains) I achieved. And this was through a diet that I prepared for myself on a daily basis, by feeling, and adding this extra workout session whenever I could of at least 15 min, and not more than 1h30, of "cardio" exercise, as varied as I could find. Jumping rope, skierg, rowerg, bikeerg, peloton, traditional gym bike, spin bike, step master, running outdoors, walking on a treadmill with steep incline, etc... All in a confortable pace, listening to my body everyday... I follow .com programming for more than 2 years now, and this said, this last 4 months I achieved a performance that I was seeking, and it came when all these pieces fell together: experience, focus on stimuli of the wod, nutrition, active recovery, sleep (this was never an issue). I'm so enlightned by these achievments that I almost don't even need a full day of rest on my weekly routine. Sauna and massages also help a lot :) Thanks Gommaar!
Amazing. Now follow wodsciences programming and crack the next level. I tell I did all the big programming companies but never performed as well as with wodscience and simultaneously felt as fresh.
Great video as always. I've just started integrating low intensity session into my routine. Looking forward seeing if this has the desired effect :)
I'd like to see some research on injury rates for each of these trying types. That may be a factor as people plan their training. As an older runner that is a big concern for me.
There’s substantial data on injury rates in CrossFit compared to other sports. Check out this video: ruclips.net/video/hZAonq_RBuY/видео.htmlsi=GGNR0XgOR9l8GBJS. Injury rates in CrossFit are generally lower than in weight-bearing sports like running, likely due to the repetitive nature and high eccentric load in those sports.
Thanks for the informative presentation as always Would love to see an Interview with you and Chris Hinshaw - both of you are great to listen to !
Thank you - great suggestion. I might hop-on a podcast with him one day.
@ that would be amazing , hopefully it happens ! Take care and keep up with the amazing work and content you and your team upload 🙏
I have 3 herniated discs, so CF is a big no no for me. Sadly Hyrox is almost non existant in Greece :(
You can train hyrox on yourself?
I am a runner. Ideal base training will have a mix of all intensities. Conventional wisdom is to use polarized mix if intensities in base training-lots of really easy running with lots of short bouts of almost maximal effort (8-15s strides, hill sprints, etc). The training then gets more specific as you get towards the race (convert some of the volume into race specific workouts). These findings are quite well supported because runners measure almost everything and we get tested (race) all the time. So this is not about intensity vs volume. You need both. You will not be a fast runner if you run a lot but only slowly. Sprinting is uniqely important as strengh exercise (inprove capacity for running slower), for neuro-muscular coordination (improve running efficiency).
Bang-on. Thank you for the insight.
Amazing quality video ! The problem is as always essentialism. Can CrossFit be good for performance, of course. Are you better at CrossFit by doing more WOD… maybe no Is performance CrossFit the same as health CrossFit… A human body get a phisiology that we need to understand to make improvements and also put them in context of the objectives. To optimize any type of gains to their full potential you need a good amount of stimulus with enough rest to overcompensate and also a non-random structure programming to achieve that optimally. Context is key
Basically train hard with SIT and HIIT, and recover by doing LISS, then do another HIIT or SIT.
Yeah, but I would argue that it is more than just doing recovery sessions as LISS. Adding 2-3 dedicated LISS sesions to your training schedule to really build that aerobic engine.
After a year with crossfit i went from 45 to 59 vo2 max with 3 session a week. But the strange part is that i’m 35 and my heart rate go max at 175bpm and i give like 90-100% of power in metcon or for time 😅
Cool! How was the VO2 measured?
Well played mate, what a great video !!! Keep em coming 👏👏
Thanks. Appreciate that from you.
Very clear and interesting video! I love progressively learning more about optimal training protocols (for free!?) and adapting my own. Great stuff!
That’s the goal!
Polarized Training
Yes
What do you mean is CrossFit missing something? All serious athletes have known that CrossFit has been missing something for a very long time. There is a reason why in the "endurance" events like the pseudo triathlons or running that elite crossfitters can be beat quite easily by Junior high level athletes. Crossfit has put out some pretty elite level strength athletes, but viewing it as a one-size-fits-all program has always been extremely flawed because the endurance component has always been abysmal.
The problem with Glassman's statement on intensity is that intensity also determines the kind of adaptation one gets (specificity of training). So it's not "high intensity better than low intensity". It depends on the kind of adaptation one is seeking. For certain adaptations moderate intensity is better than high intensity
There's so much variance in CrossFit programming from gym to gym, but It's really trendy to program like everyone is competing and making pepe do strength and short metcons every single day. That was never the case with original CrossFit which had people go heavy independent of metcons and also programmed 5&10ks and it's no wonder why people are burning out lately. Go long now and then.
Agreed. Well put.
If you want to be injured l recommend CrossFit, but if you want to be fit and functional it’s hyrox
Cannot agree at all with that statement. In fact, running is more injury prone than CrossFit. So I would argue, without having any data (yet), that Hyrox leads to more injuries than CrossFit. Let's wait for good data before drawing strong conclusions here.
Great video! Does “per training hour” include the prescribed rest periods for HIIT and sprint intervals?
This is an excellent question of which I do not know the answer of. I guess that the rest periods are not included, it’s not defined in the methods Of the paper. If you think about it, this defo skews the data because I would certainly include rest times as training time during SIT 😀
I think that while you might get more "bang for your buck" with sprint intervals, or more more mitochondria per minute of exercise, you are able to handle less volume overall. It is much more tiring physically and psychologically. And an hour per day of low intensity running plus one 2 hour longer run on the weekend should be manageable for most people (and it is enough low-to-medium intensity exercise). If you're doing sprints, you also have to be careful not to injure yourself. You need to warm up carefully, do pre-activations, etc, otherwise you're much more likely to pull a muscle, which will put you out of commission for a long time.
Yes. I’d like to include variation in training intensity. Which is what most programs and affiliates are missing.
No injuries when you avoid plants. Any kind of carbs. If you’re fat adapted you have a much more clean energy from fats Save minerals vitamins and water. No injuries for me after the switch. That must be slow. Plants are harmful addictive and cause leaky gut. The first step towards autoimmune diseases. All of them.
@@wod-science 👍 I would agree that that's the best approach.
And I also think I reached a plateau going high intensity all the time.
Training long enough, everyone will reach some kind of plateau. Question is how to break it. For most CrossFit athletes, including some session at lower intensity higher volume might be the answer.
Yes! And a point a few others have made here, especially as a mum who’s lacking in sleep now, doing more steady state lower intensity is much easier on my body and easier to recover from so I can do more 🙌🏻
This is why I love the concept of relative intensity… You push based on your current physical and psychological limits for that day, month or season of your life and over time your ability to recover and push harder increases. The problem with low intensity is you have to continue to add volume which for some like you who’s a new mom is unrealistic with time constraints. A mix of both is great.
As someone who transitioned from Crossfit to basically periodizing my lifting and running, I think long-term it’s better for me now to work submaximally and at low intensity than beating myself up with high intensity via metcons everyday. Not only did it stress my body, it also stressed my mind. Low intensity is boring but my base has never been this wide since adopting this approach. Not to say high intensity doesn’t have its place coz it does but being there often is not sustainable
I like this research article and it has some important points. How confident are you in asserting the comparability of CrossFit and HIIT training? While I acknowledge the similarities between the two, CrossFit does incorporates a wider variety of functional movements and typically involves longer time domains than traditional HIIT protocols. I feel that they are not a good parallel. In your opinion, do you consider the differences between CrossFit and HIIT protocols not significant?
You make a great point. While HIIT and SIT in these studies aren't exactly CrossFit workouts-since they're typically done on a bike or other erg-there are definitely parallels to the metabolic conditioning (metcon) workouts in CF classes, especially from a cardiovascular perspective. Most metcons push well above the anaerobic threshold, tapping into anaerobic energy systems, so they align more closely with SIT. I agree that these are somewhat assumptions, as there's a lack of long-term data specifically on functional fitness workouts and their effects on cardiovascular capacity. However, we’ve observed relatively average VO2 max levels in elite CrossFit athletes, which aligns with the findings I discussed in the video.
Quality content
Merci!
Great video, but would'nt the quote "intensity over volume" be incorrect for the jist of this situation?
Intensity over volume for quick gains yes, not for long term fitness. That said, you have elite athletes who are able to do insane volume at high-intensities all the time. This will obviously also help to build elite fitness. Not everyone is made like that though.
@6:40 im rooting for the sprints
I would love to see the results from incorporating the zone 2 training into a typical crossfit regime. Right now I do a mix of 3 crossfit sessions with 2 zone 2 cardio sessions as I found 5x crossfit per week was super draining and sometimes I would stall for long periods.
Me too :). Super curious about the results. I think you are on the right path training-wise though!
Interested in which program you follow. Too many are programming high intensity 3-12 minute metcons every single day or programming strength + metcon. Some of the zone 2 "experts" suggest that three one hour zone 2 sessions a week is the minimum effective dose.
@@MidnughtMerauders I kind of follow my own program. I have a garage gym. Typically I will follow the main site wod 3x a week and then 2 90 minute zone 2 cardio sessions. I tried going to a crossfit box but the volume there is so crazy, and they expect you to do it 3 on 1 off, that my body just cannot keep up. They do a Heavy Strength session followed by an intense WOD around that 3-12 minute mark. I don't think you need 3 zone 2 sessions minimum to get an effective dose. A lot of studies on strength and endurance show that the minimum effective dose is MUCH lower than previously assumed. For instance, hypertrophy can occur in as LITTLE as 4 sets per muscle group per week, this is insanely low. I would not believe anyone who says that 2 90 minute zone 2 sessions is not improving my cardio fitness, because my FTP begs to differ. If it was 2 30 minute or less sessions...maybe? But even then I have my doubts. I think what they probably mean to say is 3 sessions might be the "ideal" stimulus perhaps? Which I could probably agree with.
Appreciating the summaries.
I believe your study is probably pointing in the right direction and I would like to see more about it. However, you need to keep in mind that when you are doing 5 different tests, you no longer look at 5% statistically significance, since that value only works for a single test. Imagine you are doing 100 tests, chances are at least 5 of them would be statistically significant by chance. You would need to account for that.
Not fully following here - we are doing 6 tests that test overall fitness. Cardiovascular capacity, strength, power and skill. If all of those improve it is safe to say a person got better at crossfit no? We are not looking at a single test as what you are alluding to.
@@wod-science I agree with you. I might not have been very clear, I was commenting on the part where you mention statistical significance around 12:00. There is a thing called the multiple comparisons problem in statistics, which I believe would apply here. Since you are doing an intervention to test 6 different things. It becomes more likely that the intervention and control groups will appear to differ on at least one attribute due to random sampling error alone. The chance of at least one false positive is: 1 - (0.95^6) = 0.265 However, given the previous literature and the fact that there was improvement across all the attributes, I believe your results are still pointing to the truth. Hopefully this is clearer, let me know if you have any questions.
thank you for all the work you do!
I think Glassman is obviously right that for Crossfit's customer base, high intensity is the best bang for your buck. It's perfect for anyone who just wants to be healthy and wants to workout a few times a week. I also think this somehow lead to many in that community attempting to devalue low intensity training, which is obviously valuable and necessary for anyone who higher fitness aspirations.
Could not have said it better tbh. Still many athletes are doing high-intensity only. On the long term this leads to plateaus. A Toyota Prius will never drive faster, no matter how hard you push the gas pedal 😀.
I agree. I think it is very wise from this study and other studies that I have seen to try to incorporate both low intensity and high intensity. I usually do crossfit 3x a week and some type of long cardio at zone 2 twice a week, with the occasional Super high intense training mixed in where I am at max or near max heart rate.
The quote isn’t a training prescription, it’s talking about what performance is impressive. Anyone can train as much low intensity as they have time for. That’s not “impressive.” The impressive part of an athletic performance is the intensity; the peak of the pyramid. But you need the base to support it. The pyramid is only impressive because of how tall it is; no one would be impressed by just the flat first layer of stones sitting in the middle of the desert. But without that first layer, the peak could not exist. And yes even a marathon race is “high intensity;” an athlete running a marathon at race pace is red-lining their anaerobic threshold for 2.5 hours. It’s maybe not high intensity relative to a maximal deadlift but it is pushing their anaerobic threshold body in a different way that is intense relative to its aerobic capacity and lactate clearance. Running a marathon at a low-intensity, casual training pace is not that impressive; running it at a pace that pushes a physiological limit, is.
you have knowlege but make it simple for begeners
There is an error in the description of the participants. The "all" CrossFit training hour per week is too high related to the male and female data. Also is exactly the same number than the CrossFit experience (all)
Yes. Looking at this. Thank you.
Both Hyrox and CrossFit are branded event…. Hyrox is an obstacle race…. ( there are no overhead movement, heavy weight, or gymnastics skills) Is more towards an cardio… like spartan. Objective is to have as much participant as possible to make the most money. Not much technical… The actual governing federation of obstacle race is World Obstacle CrossFit is a Functional Fitness competition… is to test all aspect of Fitness… 1. Cardiovascular/respiratory endurance- 2. Stamina 3. Strength 4. Flexibility 5. Power 7. Coordination 8. Agility 9. Balance To find the fittest person. The objective of Croasfit is to create more affiliate “club” to make the most income. The governing body of Functional Fitness is International Functional Fitness Federation Hope this help you clear things out professor
Ok thanks 😀
Such a great video with a lot of incredible useful information👏just one question: I learnt (quite a while ago😅) that if you split your training or want to do strength and endurance on the same day you should definitely start with strength due to muscle and nervous fatigue, especially when doing compound exercises like deadlifts etc. Is my information still accurate or have things in the meantime changed and new studies had shown that the min. 6h rest in between are enough and therefore it really doesn't matter if I started with a zone 2rower or a strength session. Anyway please keep up your level, it's an amazing channel and I love watching your vids and always learn something new!
Thanks for the heads up 🙌. Goal of strength training is to fatigue the muscle using high load contractions. This will be impaired when you’d first do endurance training. So yes, you’re right first do strength then endurance 👍.
Like most researchers, you can't be bothered with women? Pro women seem to not be tall in Hyrox.
Researchers do care about women. Women were simply not included in early sport science due to the fact researchers thought their hormonal cycles affected study outcomes. Now that that is debunked women are increasingly included in studies.
@@wod-science yes it is changing, thankfully, however hormonal cycles absolutely do affect study outcomes. THe biggest issue with the exclusion of women was that the data from men was generalised to women when it was not applicable, much like what you are doing in your video Unless your audience is men only, I guess then it does not matter.
Smith Timothy Anderson Matthew Lewis Brian
Walker Jennifer Hernandez Laura Taylor Steven
?
Hey Gommaar, this is really cool! I also think that, when submitting grant applications, we as scientists should include the results of field surveys to demonstrate that the questions we are asking are relevant and bear real-life applications. This would certainly strengthen our application by helping make a compelling case :-) Federica
It's funny that Jeff Nippard funded a study to proof a point on the interwebs. Play the science-based Vs bro science playbook to the end.