Thanks for the program and used today at old home with power lines on two sides. More stable than the presets which surprised me from the electric interface. Worked great on coins and look forward to the relic fields.
Very much my thoughts. But sometimes it is helpful to have a lower audio response if shallow items are mainly trash but deep items are relics. But in many cases I just dig the target and only need to know if it is iron or not. Over here in the UK the deep iron can be spear heads or swords or even iron in ancient burials. It depends on the site. I was in the gold program on my Nox today. I set the Nox up very differently to most people. 👍
Very interesting video. The settings you use give me a lot to think about. Looking for the 9' coils to come out. 11" is great on the beach. I am going to try this in the dry sand. Goldfield pounds chains that my other beach machine just do not see period!
Just have the XY screen up and you don’t need to keep swapping programs because it literally shows you that your over big iron from the direction of the line. Unless you’re over such big iron that it overloads it and gives a positive signal but that’s easy enough to hear from the way it sounds.
Great video, thanks for posting this. I do have a question. You run Ground Balance in Tracking....why? This goes contrary to everything I've heard. But going contrary is not a problem for you ! I look forward to your answer. Thanks again.
Interesting, I would suggest to put audio response on 4 for the confirm program, because the X Y screen is relevant for more shallow targets. that way if you hear the item is deep, you can know the X Y screen is not reliable in that case.
Just Subbed Ya! New to Deus/2 platform coming from my CTX & TDI beach hunter etc. Fooled around with Relic tonight and really enjoyed what I describe as hunting in pinpoint with disc. Is gold field what you use most often? I would think it’d get pretty noisy in a park or field that has lots of cross century contamination. Please keep the vids coming, really like what I hear when using the D2. Thanks!!!
I liked that idea and tried gold all day with mono at 13khz and 17khz for my switch over program. I'm wondering why you chose general and not the "deeper" sensitive. Thanks
I have now had some time to try it out! I really like the ideas. I also use general with xy-screen as confirmation prgr! I find it deep and loud and sensitive. Use it for pinpointing. Hit it very often spot on! Tried to use the Goldfield, and like it. BUT it is almost everytime very noisy😔. Dont know how to come around that. Tried frequ-scan and Groundgrab, but no effekt.... Is it the ground disturbing? Or EMI? When I compare some default prgrs like Sens or Park or Gen, with Hecksyeahs setup, I find that he has a point! Switch between his setups and some default prgrs on the same target out there! 🇸🇪👍
Just guessing but try ground stabiliser On 2, on 1 the idea is to go deeper but more chatty, reduce sensitivity down a tad, say 94 ish, high reactivity can also make machine chatter, play around with settings next time out, just my thoughts 💭 we are all different and some people love a hot open chatty machine whilst others hate it and enjoy the silence 🤣🤣🤣🥳🥳😀😀
Can you show how reactivity 0 does in heavy iron with your settings in Gold Field? My testing has confirmed that Reactivity 2.5 or greater does much better where non ferrous is next to ferrous. But maybe it is better with 0???
I don't understand, why do you need to turn most things off to detect, and then use a program with things turned on to check it, why not just use the things turned on programme if it does the same?
using tracking is risky . it dosent calculate when the best time to refresh so it might do so on a target , and this screws up everything , so i would only use it if at all on very clean ground
Thanks for the settings all try them in my next hunt can you tell me what update you are on I'm running mine in the original 6 version other guys say it runs better than the new versions, did you say your running your confirmed program from the general mode but the original discrimination is 10 and you didn't mention iron volume just wanted to confirm you made it out of general thanks 👍
Hi. I run the original 6 version -- not the new 6 with the large VDI. Yes, my Confirm program is from the General program. I run disc 6.8 on the confirm with no iron volume. I never use iron volume because it wastes CPU ticks and a lot of the time you'll get iron grunts on a good target, so it's basically useless.
Why would you ever want to make a target sound quieter, causing you to potentially miss it? Why would you ever care if any target sounded differently at 10" over 2"? Don't you dig until you find the target?
I have a two quart jar full of coins that says otherwise. I think the problem is you have influencers and testers that treat the Deus 2 exactly like a detector from 1975 and don’t think out of the box and exploit new technology. Aren’t you tired of test garden videos?
@@hecksyeah5196 so why you trying to run it like a 1975 machine? Your changing a load of things to make matters worse for yourself. Test garden vids give a good idea as does air tests.
@@searchingshropshire the confirmation I have is the stack of silver I have and 40 US and international patents backing me up. I’m a trained usability engineer. XP doesn’t have a usability engineer, which is why they sent their detector out to testers. The problem is their testers aren’t usability engineers either.
@@searchingshropshire I would be interested to see two XpD2 users side by side in Uk soils head to head with settings on this video vs your best Considered settings, anyone up for the challenge to see how both compare 😊😊😊😊
Great info. Thanks!
I agree, thanks for the more advanced view on detecting.
Thanks for watching!!
Thanks for the program and used today at old home with power lines on two sides. More stable than the presets which surprised me from the electric interface. Worked great on coins and look forward to the relic fields.
Very much my thoughts. But sometimes it is helpful to have a lower audio response if shallow items are mainly trash but deep items are relics. But in many cases I just dig the target and only need to know if it is iron or not. Over here in the UK the deep iron can be spear heads or swords or even iron in ancient burials.
It depends on the site. I was in the gold program on my Nox today. I set the Nox up very differently to most people. 👍
I'll save this video ... good information. Thanks for sharing =)
Heck great information are you intending putting out some later date video info cheers
Awesome thank you very informative
Great program. Thanks for the info.
Very interesting video. The settings you use give me a lot to think about. Looking for the 9' coils to come out. 11" is great on the beach. I am going to try this in the dry sand. Goldfield pounds chains that my other beach machine just do not see period!
Turn on and go, See all your setting without scrolling thru a menu. Great detector...
Just have the XY screen up and you don’t need to keep swapping programs because it literally shows you that your over big iron from the direction of the line. Unless you’re over such big iron that it overloads it and gives a positive signal but that’s easy enough to hear from the way it sounds.
Great video, thanks for posting this. I do have a question. You run Ground Balance in Tracking....why? This goes contrary to everything I've heard. But going contrary is not a problem for you !
I look forward to your answer.
Thanks again.
Interesting, I would suggest to put audio response on 4 for the confirm program, because the X Y screen is relevant for more shallow targets. that way if you hear the item is deep, you can know the X Y screen is not reliable in that case.
Great stuff
Just Subbed Ya! New to Deus/2 platform coming from my CTX & TDI beach hunter etc. Fooled around with Relic tonight and really enjoyed what I describe as hunting in pinpoint with disc. Is gold field what you use most often? I would think it’d get pretty noisy in a park or field that has lots of cross century contamination. Please keep the vids coming, really like what I hear when using the D2. Thanks!!!
Good question. I have a trashy park that I want to try this out in.
I liked that idea and tried gold all day with mono at 13khz and 17khz for my switch over program. I'm wondering why you chose general and not the "deeper" sensitive. Thanks
I have now had some time to try it out! I really like the ideas. I also use general with xy-screen as confirmation prgr! I find it deep and loud and sensitive. Use it for pinpointing. Hit it very often spot on!
Tried to use the Goldfield, and like it. BUT it is almost everytime very noisy😔. Dont know how to come around that. Tried frequ-scan and Groundgrab, but no effekt....
Is it the ground disturbing? Or EMI?
When I compare some default prgrs like Sens or Park or Gen, with Hecksyeahs setup, I find that he has a point!
Switch between his setups and some default prgrs on the same target out there!
🇸🇪👍
Just guessing but try ground stabiliser On 2, on 1 the idea is to go deeper but more chatty, reduce sensitivity down a tad, say 94 ish, high reactivity can also make machine chatter, play around with settings next time out, just my thoughts 💭 we are all different and some people love a hot open chatty machine whilst others hate it and enjoy the silence 🤣🤣🤣🥳🥳😀😀
Can you show how reactivity 0 does in heavy iron with your settings in Gold Field? My testing has confirmed that Reactivity 2.5 or greater does much better where non ferrous is next to ferrous. But maybe it is better with 0???
Just subbed. Maybe number 100. Nice vid
THANK YOU!!!
Great information, thanks for sharing, problems with the new update? What have you heard?
Calabash Digger has a video with upgrade and passed all tests with no depth loss.
Great idea...
Heck yeah where you at? Waiting for any new vids. Take care bro 😎
I don't understand, why do you need to turn most things off to detect, and then use a program with things turned on to check it, why not just use the things turned on programme if it does the same?
Good idea thumbs up
using tracking is risky . it dosent calculate when the best time to refresh so it might do so on a target , and this screws up everything , so i would only use it if at all on very clean ground
Thanks for the settings all try them in my next hunt can you tell me what update you are on I'm running mine in the original 6 version other guys say it runs better than the new versions, did you say your running your confirmed program from the general mode but the original discrimination is 10 and you didn't mention iron volume just wanted to confirm you made it out of general thanks 👍
Hi. I run the original 6 version -- not the new 6 with the large VDI. Yes, my Confirm program is from the General program. I run disc 6.8 on the confirm with no iron volume. I never use iron volume because it wastes CPU ticks and a lot of the time you'll get iron grunts on a good target, so it's basically useless.
@@hecksyeah5196 Thanks 👍
It is interesting program but for me it is too talkative. So I set reactivity to 0 . But will see how it works on field tomorrow.Thanks
Can we see some real world finds with your superJ program.
Reales, large cents, silver dimes, you name it I have found it with this program.
Do you really want your 10" targets sound the same as your 2" targets?
Why would you ever want to make a target sound quieter, causing you to potentially miss it? Why would you ever care if any target sounded differently at 10" over 2"? Don't you dig until you find the target?
@@hecksyeah5196 Those quieter targets are the ones I dig. Just another way to discriminate surface trash. To each his own ;)
@@gwcracker I’ve found an 1829 silver half-dime,a 1858 silver seated quarter, an 1803 silver half Reale, and a 1735 copper Chinese coin 2” down.
Thanks!
Thank you
I’ll try it..
Cant hear you talking!
No no and no. Never run the Deus 2 in this way and this is coming from a tester for XP.
I have a two quart jar full of coins that says otherwise. I think the problem is you have influencers and testers that treat the Deus 2 exactly like a detector from 1975 and don’t think out of the box and exploit new technology. Aren’t you tired of test garden videos?
@@hecksyeah5196 so why you trying to run it like a 1975 machine? Your changing a load of things to make matters worse for yourself.
Test garden vids give a good idea as does air tests.
@@searchingshropshire the confirmation I have is the stack of silver I have and 40 US and international patents backing me up. I’m a trained usability engineer. XP doesn’t have a usability engineer, which is why they sent their detector out to testers. The problem is their testers aren’t usability engineers either.
@@hecksyeah5196 hats off to you. But I’ll still stick to the original statement.
@@searchingshropshire
I would be interested to see two XpD2 users side by side in Uk soils head to head with settings on this video vs your best Considered settings, anyone up for the challenge to see how both compare 😊😊😊😊