The Pilot is a good all rounder. It’s not the best off road, nor gas mileage but they’re great, reliable vehicles. I did like the last generation more with it being boxy, but it’s not terrible. I’m excited to see what happens to the Acura MDX since the Pilot Elite is kind of a better deal right now. I am curious though.. the AWD sounds similar to SH-AWD. Is it the same and his renamed for Honda?
SH-AWD and i-VTM4 are primarily very similar. The main difference is that SH-AWD allows more flexibility around corners when torque is pushed to the rearwheel. The system in i-VTM4 shuts that down. I hope I answered your question correctly.
I owned a 2018 Pilot and had a after market hitch installed, it was so ugly I couldn't live with it so I traded in my Pilot. I bought a 2019 Acura MDX( advance trim level). It was very nice but... For 60k I expected more out of the MDX. There is so many shared parts from the Pilot in the MDX. The MDX was much smaller so the the 3rd row was more just for looks than anybody to include small children being able to have a comfortable ride in the 3rd row. I decided to trade in the MDX and went back to the Pilot. I got a 2019 Pilot (Elite) and I am much happier with the Pilot than the MDX. I can say that the MDX has a sportier and more luxury look to it than the Pilot. If your looking for a smooth ride and capable vehicle for 50k the Pilot Elite is it. Im sure there are other vehicles in that price range that look more sporty and offer more but, Honda owners purchase Honda's for quality and longevity. The Pilot offers a sort of panoramic sunroof ( the MDX doesn't) and comfortable seating for 7 or 8 people. I have the 7 seater with the center counsel in the rear. All and all said if your looking for a full SUV (CUV) the Pilot is worth a look. With all the opinions out there I hope this can help at least one person looking for a vehicle
Anyone considering the 9spd transmission should really drive both 9spd vs 6spd variant. The ZF 9spd transmission is not known for its reliability. It's available in other manufacturers vehicles. No one has ever said the ZF 9spd is best in class.
The VTM-4 system in my 2007 Honda Pilot is awesome off-road! I bet this Pilot would be awesome off-road too with a 2” lift, all terrain tires, and sway bar disconnects.
@@GotterAdventure unfortunately lower gearing is difficult to add yet incredibly important. Even with over a 19:1 first high range ratio I hate the lag feeling and jumpiness of the converter making all the torque.
Yes...had the Subaru Ascent been out in 2016, my choices would have been the Pilot, Highlander and the Ascent. But it wasn't, so I got the Pilot. -- BR
Still not sure if I like the new look. There were certain angles where the pilot resembled the Odyssey. Great vehicle of course , just starting to look less like an SUV.
White exterior/black cloth interior with the 6spd and navigation that's all I need from the pilot. 9spd have been really bad transmissions, good luck with them.
@@cuzimaluzer777 Subaru's are shit. They are notoriously known for really bad transmissions. It doesn't take very long at all for them to falling apart. If that is not enough, the box engines are known for blowing up. Unless you like gutless cars that you and want to spend lots of money on repairs, Subaru's should be avoided.
Even less of a reason to get an MDX now! I reviewed the 2016 pilot and the only fault I found was loud cabin noise. MDX is a pilot with lipstick at best.
It’s funny when I see or hear people say that these pilots can’t off road! They may not be as good as some full on 4 wd vehicles that may be more capable but I’ve put my pilot in some off road conditions that it made it through that may surprise some!
Should you tow in sports mode? or regular mode ? or does it really matte? I thought maybe sports mode because of less shifting and more torque being use. What are your thoughts?
Well, the Pilot's had that since the 2016 model...which is one reason I got the Pilot over the 2016 Highlander back then, as the Pilot's AWD system was superior to Toyota's (TFL took both to Gold Mine Hill, IIRC). Another was I wanted a slightly roomier interior, AND be able to tow 5000lbs (which the Highlander could do also, as most V6 engine mid-size SUVs can). So far, my Pilot's been fine...none of the issues some 2016 owners have reported as "common problems." None. -- BR
TFL, can't wait until you review the new Passport. Will you have test drives of the Passport in Jan\Feb 2019? What do you think about the 6-speed vs the 9-speed?
Honda has never put very robust (automatic) transmissions in their vehicles. I would never consider a Honda for towing, particularly with the problematic 9 speed ZF tranny.
Generally I'm a fervid CVT hater BUT in this case choose the lesser of 2 Evils: Give a shot to Subaru. Their CVT's are some of the resilient ones out there if cared for. But still . . . don't tow or do any off-roading with it, they just can't take it, too much Sauce, not enough Meat.
I test drove one of those at 6rpm the engine sounds like it’s gonna break apart and rattles horribly bad, 2020 model . Huge fail and still slow . Nice inside though .
I'm wondering if he does most of the editing. With all the videos they're doing every week editing has probably become a full time job. But that's just my guess..
Anyone know if a Honda Pilot would be good to haul a couple of atvs and/or a toy hauler? Trying to kill two birds with one stone. Buy a suv for the mrs (expecting 2nd baby) and have something to haul some dirt toys.
So macho looking now! Definitely not the AWD trim Odyssey anymore...no sir.......(is this enough ellipsis to make my point?)........ As far as the hardware, i-VTM-4 isn't a bad on demand 4wd system but remember that 70% torque to the rear wheels means that 30% will never get there, unlike a part time or locked full time system that can send 100% to either axle as needed. It won't matter much until you lift a wheel going up a steep hill where there wont be a lot of weight on the front axle and the rear axle will be tasked with the bulk of the tractive effort. I mean...it's fine for the AWD odyssey trim. To be honest its better than most systems, but anything much more than a family crossover it aint.
You are being a little overly optimistic on the performance of the Ascent. It is a really nice vehicle, but it just came out. No one knows how either the engine or the transmission will perform longterm.
This video for the most part was useless. They kept showing inside (his face) rather than car outside what it's doing and how it's overcoming an obstacle. I did not enjoy this video. Sorry TFLC (Thumbs down)
There might be questions to the Pilots styling and off road capabilities, but it is not slow, one of these would easily be able to pull away from your old gm powered v6.
Why in the world would you buy this thing with FWD, I'm guessing they have that option for all the people that don't know what AWD or FWD means and opt for the FWD one to save some bucks. LOL, if you wanted the FWD one just get an Odysee, maybe they don't like sliding doors, whatever.
I have FWD 5 seat, 4 cyl Highlander. And this is what I wanted. I saved 5K+ by not getting 3rd row, 6cyl and AWD. And I have this car for 9.5 years. And never in life I missed having AWD. When my FWD can't tackle the snow, it must be enough of white stuff to call for snow emergency, so no one allowed on the road. I drove Nissan 240Sx on snow days. This was fun. See, this is not about get going, its about stopping. And no, I don't need to give my car a mud bath.
I think your the minority, but I guess many people want the SUV look I guess, because I don't see a reason for extra ground clearance of the SUV if your using it as you say. Sedona with a 4 cylinder seems like a better fit.
As far as clear thinking goes, I am the minority for sure. How come, my neighbor has 2 AWD SUVs but as soon as any snow starts falling, he puts them into garage and doesn't come out until township cleans the road? Meanwhile, I take my cars to stores, to empty parking lots and do snow donuts, etc. I was at the winter wedding in Boston; by the time we came out from restaurant around 3am, there was a ~10 inches of snow outside. I drove Mercury Villager on that trip and it took me through un-cleaned roads with no issues. At night with no cars I came to hotel faster on the snow than during the day on dry surface.
theodorekell Im in a snow state, Minnesota and truely went from a RWD car as my first, to two FWD cars and now in an AWD car for the past 6+ years. I won't go back to FWD unless I fall on hard times. A RWD, sure for a 6-8 month out of the year vehicle only though. FWD works, but I love just going when the stop light goes green instead of sitting there spinning my FWD tires. I guess if you don't see snow and ice very much FWD is fine. But in my opinion once the vehicle size gets into mid size SUV and minivan territory and you deal with ice and snow AWD is helpful to get going. i kid you not I've driven by people with brand new FWD cars that couldn't make it up a packed snow covered/ice road. Those are our condititions. It's rarely deep snow, just snow that gets packed on the road and crushed into smooth snow/ice. By the way I love doing donuts too in parking lots with my AWD SUV. Glad your happy with your method of transportion and its working out for ya too though.
Finally you came to the truth. Because you started with "Why in the world would you buy this thing with FWD". Think about this - conditions like yours affect RELATIVELY small part of population. If you look at US population density map, you will realize that large territory that requires 4WD is hosting not that many people. My relatives live in Boston and drive nothing but Honda Accord. Look, last December I caught huge snow storm between Boston and Hartford. I passed every car, every AWD, every Subaru. They all took their SUVs and drove 25mph on empty 3-lane hwy. I was going 45 in FWD sedan in 8 inches of snow passing as many cars as possible on the uphills. Then whats the point?
This "SUV" is the utlimate example of how people need a people carrier but wants to look less like mini-van. It's pathetic. A minivan, definitely gives better interior space in every way. Can you deny that? No you cant. Im sorry, ever since the Pilot came out a few years back, I never like how bulbous in looked. The new Pilot should had been more like a traditional SUV, just like how the older gen was. That looked more like an SUv even though it was a unibody. I bet that'll do better off-road than this giant blob.
I do agree that these newer pilot models after 2nd generation just look like mini vans, the first generation reminds me more of a off road look and feel to them
How is the new Pilot different from the old one? Check out this video to find out: ruclips.net/video/eYzVlZL8IxM/видео.html
😊😊
The Pilot is a good all rounder. It’s not the best off road, nor gas mileage but they’re great, reliable vehicles. I did like the last generation more with it being boxy, but it’s not terrible. I’m excited to see what happens to the Acura MDX since the Pilot Elite is kind of a better deal right now.
I am curious though.. the AWD sounds similar to SH-AWD. Is it the same and his renamed for Honda?
When you said last year what year is that ? 2019 ?
@@davidcazares2469 I left this comment in 2019 but I was talking about the 2009-2015. It's the second generation.
SH-AWD and i-VTM4 are primarily very similar. The main difference is that SH-AWD allows more flexibility around corners when torque is pushed to the rearwheel. The system in i-VTM4 shuts that down. I hope I answered your question correctly.
I owned a 2018 Pilot and had a after market hitch installed, it was so ugly I couldn't live with it so I traded in my Pilot. I bought a 2019 Acura MDX( advance trim level). It was very nice but... For 60k I expected more out of the MDX. There is so many shared parts from the Pilot in the MDX. The MDX was much smaller so the the 3rd row was more just for looks than anybody to include small children being able to have a comfortable ride in the 3rd row. I decided to trade in the MDX and went back to the Pilot. I got a 2019 Pilot (Elite) and I am much happier with the Pilot than the MDX. I can say that the MDX has a sportier and more luxury look to it than the Pilot. If your looking for a smooth ride and capable vehicle for 50k the Pilot Elite is it. Im sure there are other vehicles in that price range that look more sporty and offer more but, Honda owners purchase Honda's for quality and longevity. The Pilot offers a sort of panoramic sunroof ( the MDX doesn't) and comfortable seating for 7 or 8 people. I have the 7 seater with the center counsel in the rear. All and all said if your looking for a full SUV (CUV) the Pilot is worth a look. With all the opinions out there I hope this can help at least one person looking for a vehicle
“Vtec...it kicked in yo!” Lol
Yes sir it kicks hard with a cold air intake!
Also liked the country version of Les Poppys in the background, great review guys. Greetings from the Netherlands.
It has led headlights like the MDX too. And reverse lights where they're supposed to be. No longer in the bottom of the bumper. Very nice.
What year are you referring to ?
Anyone considering the 9spd transmission should really drive both 9spd vs 6spd variant. The ZF 9spd transmission is not known for its reliability. It's available in other manufacturers vehicles. No one has ever said the ZF 9spd is best in class.
The VTM-4 system in my 2007 Honda Pilot is awesome off-road! I bet this Pilot would be awesome off-road too with a 2” lift, all terrain tires, and sway bar disconnects.
Check out JonDZ adventuring. He wheels the parts off his Passport.
@@KTMcaptain I went up Imogene Pass with JohnDZ! The low gearing of the new 9 speed transmission gave him a huge advantage over my 1st gen.
@@GotterAdventure unfortunately lower gearing is difficult to add yet incredibly important. Even with over a 19:1 first high range ratio I hate the lag feeling and jumpiness of the converter making all the torque.
I’m happy with my 16’ pilot...btw I love the vtec sound,I want tfl compare off road(gold mine) between Subaru ascent and the new pilot
Yes...had the Subaru Ascent been out in 2016, my choices would have been the Pilot, Highlander and the Ascent.
But it wasn't, so I got the Pilot.
-- BR
I do too, but it isn't gonna happen as they aren't allowed to get Subaru vehicles anymore....Its a shame
Still not sure if I like the new look. There were certain angles where the pilot resembled the Odyssey. Great vehicle of course , just starting to look less like an SUV.
TFL at night 😎
White exterior/black cloth interior with the 6spd and navigation that's all I need from the pilot.
9spd have been really bad transmissions, good luck with them.
Kartboarder22G believe that’s a zf sourced tranny
Wasnt the 6speed the one with all the problems?
SOLD
Honda baby . yes. Yes YES . ANY DAYS
Gold Mine Hill in that pleaaaasee
The cvt would melt
Angel Gutierrez pilot doesn’t have a cvt
@@angelgjr1999 they don't melt offroad in Subaru's
@@cuzimaluzer777 Subaru's are shit. They are notoriously known for really bad transmissions. It doesn't take very long at all for them to falling apart. If that is not enough, the box engines are known for blowing up. Unless you like gutless cars that you and want to spend lots of money on repairs, Subaru's should be avoided.
@@__Paul__ Agree. Subi is not what it used to be.
I would call this light off roading. Honda For the WIN!!!
I think it's much better looking and modern this time around than the previous model
The OEM upgrade of a trans cooler gives a higher towing capacity. i added it with mine.
The trans cooler gets you to 5k. Without it 2500 is the max.
1:00 now that’s back!
Ever since the Yugo, and the beetle!
Even less of a reason to get an MDX now! I reviewed the 2016 pilot and the only fault I found was loud cabin noise. MDX is a pilot with lipstick at best.
Lol
It’s funny when I see or hear people say that these pilots can’t off road! They may not be as good as some full on 4 wd vehicles that may be more capable but I’ve put my pilot in some off road conditions that it made it through that may surprise some!
IKE GAUNTLET test this please!!! Great video as always guys!!
Should you tow in sports mode? or regular mode ? or does it really matte? I thought maybe sports mode because of less shifting and more torque being use. What are your thoughts?
US News suggests buying the highlander than the pilot because of the reliability. Is this accurate?
I was hoping this would be a surprise video from Nissan, stating they are bringing back the Xterra........
finally SHAWD on a Honda.
Well, the Pilot's had that since the 2016 model...which is one reason I got the Pilot over the 2016 Highlander back then, as the Pilot's AWD system was superior to Toyota's (TFL took both to Gold Mine Hill, IIRC).
Another was I wanted a slightly roomier interior, AND be able to tow 5000lbs (which the Highlander could do also, as most V6 engine mid-size SUVs can).
So far, my Pilot's been fine...none of the issues some 2016 owners have reported as "common problems." None.
-- BR
@@billredding2000 Toyota Highlander and RAV4 are sucks. Anything better than them. And Honda not much better than many, yeah other than above.
VTEC Kick In yoo!!!!
TFL, can't wait until you review the new Passport. Will you have test drives of the Passport in Jan\Feb 2019? What do you think about the 6-speed vs the 9-speed?
It looked as though the Pilot had highway tires mounted, not offroad. That makes its performance even a little more impressive.
Pre pandemic
I MISS YOU SO MUCH "NORMAL" TIMES
Hey thanks enjoyed your review.
Omg! The music wtf stop using music!
5:52 nice Cletus McFarland music btw!! 👍🏻🦅⚡️🇺🇸
Jade's Garage lol it’s probably a canned edit song they both found but yeah same song!
For 2019 Honda should have put new headlights and brake lights on ex-l model too. These led lights are for two top lines elite and touring.
why can't Honda just make it produce an even 300hp
james0611847 have you seen Ford and Toyota wtf you smoking maybe the Pathfinder is better looking
Because that's saved for the v6s in acuras
they are scared of new tech crv turbos failed and want easy money!
It is certainly ironic that TFL can't review Subaru Ascent as a new competitor of Pilot...
Does the pilot come with a tow hitch or do you have to install it?
A little late but it has a optional tow package.
Great Vid ....
Honda Pilot video interrupted by Kia Sorento commercial! LOL
Plz do a review of the Toyota Highlander 2018 xle
No comparison to Subaru Ascent Eh? Why because they wouldn’t give u a loner?
It’s a Version of the Nissan Pathfinder it looks like ?
I want to see highlander and telluride doing offroad test
Does this mean a new ridgeline ?
Please review the VW Atlas towing vs Honda Pilot towing.
i like the pilot and its v6 is awesome but the highlander just looks better
Is brand new pilot interior exterior same ridge line Honda front
Now we need Roadkill vs Honda
power sliding a pilot hahaha
Thanks for the headline!
does my pilot have a transmission coler becase my pilot is awd model
Apparently MDX and PILOT 2019 ...DO have HYBRID versions.
Nice video good car for the money I think
With Honda's transmissions made out of Wax I wouldn't even try to tow an empty baby stroller.
Honda has never put very robust (automatic) transmissions in their vehicles. I would never consider a Honda for towing, particularly with the problematic 9 speed ZF tranny.
Good to know, but in your opinion Accent with CVT tranny or Pilot 6 speed?
Generally I'm a fervid CVT hater BUT in this case choose the lesser of 2 Evils: Give a shot to Subaru. Their CVT's are some of the resilient ones out there if cared for.
But still . . . don't tow or do any off-roading with it, they just can't take it, too much Sauce, not enough Meat.
Tell me about it, I have a 1998 CR-V AWD waiting for a tranny repair at only 114K miles.
And people got the nerve to ask why I daily a manual shitbox.
There you go . . .
Even a Honda could handle that course:)
10:19 the previous Pilot
unimog would be better :)
I test drove one of those at 6rpm the engine sounds like it’s gonna break apart and rattles horribly bad, 2020 model . Huge fail and still slow . Nice inside though .
2:06 dat VTEC crossover
i like Andre's approach, but where is Nathan?
I'm wondering if he does most of the editing. With all the videos they're doing every week editing has probably become a full time job. But that's just my guess..
a very capable car for relatively cheap
2:55 is that rust already?
Micro Cleats that’s orange dirt lol
That sticker package is CRINGE!
good to see Kim Jong-un's barber found work outside Korea
10 000 likes at Andrew goes a Arnold impression? Kinda sounded like him at 8:44
Anyone know if a Honda Pilot would be good to haul a couple of atvs and/or a toy hauler? Trying to kill two birds with one stone. Buy a suv for the mrs (expecting 2nd baby) and have something to haul some dirt toys.
Power full suv
0:52 Isn't it "Intelligent Variable Torque Management"?
AWD is a waste of money on a crossover because its designed for use on paved roads. It won't un stick you.
So macho looking now! Definitely not the AWD trim Odyssey anymore...no sir.......(is this enough ellipsis to make my point?)........
As far as the hardware, i-VTM-4 isn't a bad on demand 4wd system but remember that 70% torque to the rear wheels means that 30% will never get there, unlike a part time or locked full time system that can send 100% to either axle as needed. It won't matter much until you lift a wheel going up a steep hill where there wont be a lot of weight on the front axle and the rear axle will be tasked with the bulk of the tractive effort. I mean...it's fine for the AWD odyssey trim. To be honest its better than most systems, but anything much more than a family crossover it aint.
those wheels look like they came off a 500x pop
Cheap gauge cluster in a $50K car
Looks far better in-person. Found that out today :)
The pilot might have good reliability but the ride is way to harsh for anyone with arthritis in their spine.
Its one of the smoothest riding nonluxury vehicles ive ever driven
Is that rust inside the fuel door at the 2:55 mark?
I believe its grease
FNTony 496, Yes, that would make more sense,...my eyes aren't that great !
Honda could have at least used white grease on the this car, knowing it was going to be used in this video.
Attention to detail,......somebody didn't pay that!
Can Honda just make one SUV that doesn't look like a froot wagon?
8: 17 giant Hill really
Andre. Has someone been working out?
What Andre? - Andryuha
gold mine hill
gold mine hill
gold mine hill
4:55 minivan
I'd rather buy an Atlas.
"It feels really sporty" uhhhhhhh
Looks like a minivan
A minivan disguised as an SUV. Smart move from Honda.
Isnt it a cuv?
I want this in pakistan
I really want to like this thing but it just looks so fat and blah
Wrong
Cant tow 5000 with all passenger !
Subaru Accent -- better fuel economy, better predicted resale value, more reliable (especially transmission), better AWD that for sure, ground clearance 8.7 inches, MSRP under 40k, etc.
You are being a little overly optimistic on the performance of the Ascent. It is a really nice vehicle, but it just came out. No one knows how either the engine or the transmission will perform longterm.
Exactly, it will be good to see what happens with the CVT and towing down the road and turbo 4 cylinder......Guess we'll see Subaru.
accent failed with the cvt
What do you mean it failed with the cvt, like there was a failure documented somehow, or your opinion it failed.
DirectX3, I've got your joke. The sarcasm. No, it is funny. You should pick a new name - The Joker!
A rugged Honda Pilot? Lol
This SUV looks like a bubble.
You look like an idiot.
@@alexvranesich6774 Random comment Erick. Are you a car salesman for Hyundai, Kia or Toyota?
Toyota Highlander all the way
for less money too...why would anyone buy the Honda
The better AWD system.
Oh yea and the better 0-60
For this kind money, why not range rover?
theodorekell range rovers cost more, and they’re significantly less reliable
This video for the most part was useless. They kept showing inside (his face) rather than car outside what it's doing and how it's overcoming an obstacle. I did not enjoy this video. Sorry TFLC (Thumbs down)
Dayum.. that's the ugliest "updated" car I've seen.... 'Muricans have weird taste. Keep that thing in 'Murica!
Slow asf, that sound was good but its slow. My 2008 suzuki xl7 is way faster and tows about the same (AWD)
There might be questions to the Pilots styling and off road capabilities, but it is not slow, one of these would easily be able to pull away from your old gm powered v6.
@@garys2157 that 0-60 was sooo slow bruh lmao
Why is the fuel economy so terrible on these vehicles. I mean these are similar fuel economy numbers to trucks! F150 2.7 gets 20 26
exhibit sensitive make command impossible confident project sufficient founder if minority
Lina Dubois what?
Why in the world would you buy this thing with FWD, I'm guessing they have that option for all the people that don't know what AWD or FWD means and opt for the FWD one to save some bucks. LOL, if you wanted the FWD one just get an Odysee, maybe they don't like sliding doors, whatever.
I have FWD 5 seat, 4 cyl Highlander. And this is what I wanted. I saved 5K+ by not getting 3rd row, 6cyl and AWD. And I have this car for 9.5 years. And never in life I missed having AWD. When my FWD can't tackle the snow, it must be enough of white stuff to call for snow emergency, so no one allowed on the road. I drove Nissan 240Sx on snow days. This was fun. See, this is not about get going, its about stopping. And no, I don't need to give my car a mud bath.
I think your the minority, but I guess many people want the SUV look I guess, because I don't see a reason for extra ground clearance of the SUV if your using it as you say. Sedona with a 4 cylinder seems like a better fit.
As far as clear thinking goes, I am the minority for sure. How come, my neighbor has 2 AWD SUVs but as soon as any snow starts falling, he puts them into garage and doesn't come out until township cleans the road? Meanwhile, I take my cars to stores, to empty parking lots and do snow donuts, etc. I was at the winter wedding in Boston; by the time we came out from restaurant around 3am, there was a ~10 inches of snow outside. I drove Mercury Villager on that trip and it took me through un-cleaned roads with no issues. At night with no cars I came to hotel faster on the snow than during the day on dry surface.
theodorekell Im in a snow state, Minnesota and truely went from a RWD car as my first, to two FWD cars and now in an AWD car for the past 6+ years. I won't go back to FWD unless I fall on hard times. A RWD, sure for a 6-8 month out of the year vehicle only though. FWD works, but I love just going when the stop light goes green instead of sitting there spinning my FWD tires. I guess if you don't see snow and ice very much FWD is fine. But in my opinion once the vehicle size gets into mid size SUV and minivan territory and you deal with ice and snow AWD is helpful to get going. i kid you not I've driven by people with brand new FWD cars that couldn't make it up a packed snow covered/ice road. Those are our condititions. It's rarely deep snow, just snow that gets packed on the road and crushed into smooth snow/ice. By the way I love doing donuts too in parking lots with my AWD SUV. Glad your happy with your method of transportion and its working out for ya too though.
Finally you came to the truth. Because you started with "Why in the world would you buy this thing with FWD". Think about this - conditions like yours affect RELATIVELY small part of population. If you look at US population density map, you will realize that large territory that requires 4WD is hosting not that many people. My relatives live in Boston and drive nothing but Honda Accord. Look, last December I caught huge snow storm between Boston and Hartford. I passed every car, every AWD, every Subaru. They all took their SUVs and drove 25mph on empty 3-lane hwy. I was going 45 in FWD sedan in 8 inches of snow passing as many cars as possible on the uphills. Then whats the point?
To many SJW's at Honda right now, BOOO
That's way too much for the elite..no way. Just get an Infiniti or something for a little more not a honda.
your reviews are not helpful. not a single soul is buying a honda to take it off roading. not one. the pilot is the modern day minivan
Junk
This "SUV" is the utlimate example of how people need a people carrier but wants to look less like mini-van. It's pathetic. A minivan, definitely gives better interior space in every way. Can you deny that? No you cant. Im sorry, ever since the Pilot came out a few years back, I never like how bulbous in looked.
The new Pilot should had been more like a traditional SUV, just like how the older gen was. That looked more like an SUv even though it was a unibody. I bet that'll do better off-road than this giant blob.
@@disco.lemonade | I was telling my reason why I wouldnt purchase one. What others buy or doesn't buy isnt my concern at all.
Did honda just ruin your life?
@@kens7420 | Nope. My family has owned a few Hondas in the past and they all were solid. I just told my opinion on the Pilot.
I do agree that these newer pilot models after 2nd generation just look like mini vans, the first generation reminds me more of a off road look and feel to them
@@rickharrison6969 I've got a first gen and its great