Very good point to defend the application. There is also a risk with "planting the seed" is that if a vulnerable person has a personality "disorder" Tthen this could lead to suggestions imagined as real, and could lead to more distress the the client and more complex matters moving forward.
While it may be more common that men are the perpetrators I feel there's a risk in overstating this. Domestic violence against men is under recognized and when men are in this situation it can be nearly impossible to get any help if people think of DV as only a women's issue. Forms of DV that aren't physical especially are probably committed by women more often than we think but it gets perceived differently because of these biases.
Currently not able to communicate text. No for my colleague - Attorney General - this understanding of the attorney general, is quite Sherlock Holmes.YES. If anything I add nothing. No if I did it would be- 1, the code 2, feelings 3, the character Like using Sherlock Holmes techniques in pursuit of attorney general rules. Supreme court Brisbane Library would not be happy if I didn't mention- i) dress code. ii) hair and makeup iii) marks on skin not necessary injuries. On behalf of these ladies thank you attorney general. AAJJ
Careful what you wish for. So if an Australian statutory authority runs advertising campaign and promotes it via the mass media in regards to how and what we do in our every day daily life's. Could or would it be viewed as coercive control of my family members or my partner that constitutes a breach of the coercive laws that may result in (Depression/anger/confusion/abuse/discrimination/misinformation.)That could effect the lives of the general public for years. . If so who would be in breach of these laws? Question - Are the the people who proposed or applied the laws and also would the mass media be culpable by is using coercive control to get their point across? A money pit for the Lawyers and hangers on. Back to the drawing boards me thinks! Stupid is that stupid does.
Is a trigger warning reallyyyyyyy THAT necessary? 🤔 😂 people need to really learn how to handle being triggered and it’s never going to happen if trigger warnings are around every dang corner.
people who haven’t lived with extreme coercive control have no idea, thank you for trying to shine a light on this disgusting form of abuse
I never knew this serious, scary & extremely damaging form of abuse existed until it happened to me & my children.
Very good point to defend the application. There is also a risk with "planting the seed" is that if a vulnerable person has a personality "disorder" Tthen this could lead to suggestions imagined as real, and could lead to more distress the the client and more complex matters moving forward.
If a person experience this at a workplace with "Superiors" or some Co workers? What is night to do? When you can t lose your job?
It’s hard when you are overwhelmed with anxiety
While it may be more common that men are the perpetrators I feel there's a risk in overstating this. Domestic violence against men is under recognized and when men are in this situation it can be nearly impossible to get any help if people think of DV as only a women's issue. Forms of DV that aren't physical especially are probably committed by women more often than we think but it gets perceived differently because of these biases.
Currently not able to communicate text.
No for my colleague - Attorney General - this understanding of the attorney general, is quite Sherlock Holmes.YES.
If anything I add nothing.
No if I did it would be-
1, the code
2, feelings
3, the character
Like using Sherlock Holmes techniques in pursuit of attorney general rules.
Supreme court Brisbane Library would not be happy if I didn't mention-
i) dress code.
ii) hair and makeup
iii) marks on skin not necessary injuries.
On behalf of these ladies thank you attorney general.
AAJJ
Careful what you wish for.
So if an Australian statutory authority runs advertising campaign and promotes it via the mass media in regards to how and what we do in our every day daily life's.
Could or would it be viewed as coercive control of my family members or my partner that constitutes a breach of the coercive laws that may result in (Depression/anger/confusion/abuse/discrimination/misinformation.)That could effect the lives of the general public for years.
.
If so who would be in breach of these laws?
Question - Are the the people who proposed or applied the laws and also would the mass media be culpable by is using coercive control to get their point across?
A money pit for the Lawyers and hangers on.
Back to the drawing boards me thinks! Stupid is that stupid does.
The chart at 7:12 is telling.
LOL. No one ever 'recognises' that they are on our ancestral land in the UK. I guess it only works one way.
The language should be gender-neutral
no she explained that facts and statistics are gendered.
Is a trigger warning reallyyyyyyy THAT necessary? 🤔 😂 people need to really learn how to handle being triggered and it’s never going to happen if trigger warnings are around every dang corner.
They give the warning to protect themselves. If someone is triggered they can't complain because they were warned about the possibility.
I agree!!