Amber Heard Vs Johnny Depp Body Language Analysis MEGA-Episode/Compilation
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- Audible Link: www.audibletria...
Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp nonverbal and body language analysis compilation video. Dimmed by 45% to accommodate dark mode/nighttime viewing.
Patreon: / observeentertainment
Observe Merch Shop: teespring.com/...
Audible Trial Link: www.audibletria...
Subscribe: www.youtube.com...
INTRO/OUTRO MUSIC BY AMARIA:
------------------------------
"Funky Souls" | "Elizabeth's Groove" | "Lovely Swindler" by Amarià / amariamusique
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/Funky-Souls
Music promoted by Audio Library • Funky Souls - Amarià (...
Lovely Swindler by Amarià / amariamusique
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/lovely-...
------------------------------
Observe Email: observe.contact@gmail.com
![Yailin La Mas Viral, @kreizyk.official - Dale 2 (Remix) [Video Oficial]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JaYHBzgqz94/mqdefault.jpg)
NOTE: This is a compilation of my Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard case analysis. It has been dimmed and edited to allow for better background listening or nighttime viewing. Thank you for watching!
Awww... I thought it was a new video about it.. I'm not a fan of these compilation videos, since I can watch each of the videos on JD and AH perfectly fine. I love your videos, but I would consider this pretty much a re-upload type of video.
That's awesome! I needed some content for when I take my daily 10 mile walk and this was the best possible channel to provide it. Thank you for constantly making quality content and I hope you will be around for quite some time as long as you enjoy it! ❤
I love how you dimmed it as someone super sensitive to light. Ty
@@TwistOfFate444 Please inform me why the phone/computer brightness doesn't help, and him dimming it makes it better. I'm genuinely curious and not judging you by the way, just so you know.
Whoot thanks so much for dimming it and ill be able to listen while doing things. I appreciate the stitching together you did and the extra mods:)
It was so hilarious to me when Elaine asked Spiegel if Depp eating in court was a sign of narcissism. My mind went back to this deposition. Like, girl was literally eating DURING her questioning and then her team tries implying it's a sign of a behavioral disorder lol Everything about that trial was such a projection of her own faults and hypocrisies.
The best part was right after that, Camille and Ben Chew started eating the candy in front of Johnny. That was awesome!!
@@rainbowgoth1566 Yes! Loved that they were a little petty with it lol
Poor man is a smoker, he was eating candy to stave off his cravings for a ciggy.
@@magdalene74 yep! That's what both hubby and I said. I guess that's narcissistic 🤣
@@magdalene74 Oh yeah, I totally forgot about that. He's a heavy smoker too so that must've been torture. I was a pack a day smoker for 20 years so no doubt I would've had to do the same to cope.
Her descriptions often follow the pattern of "He hit me. He hit me with a closed fist. He hit me with a closed fist while wearing a hat." She repeats the same thing and keeps adding details. I remember thinking: "This kind of description reminds me of something. But of whom?"
And then it hit me: myself. I'm a fiction writer. When I'm doing the first draft of a text, I fall into this pattern of narration. The repetition gives you time to make up new details as you're going along.
Later I have to revise my texts many times to smooth out this terrible repetitive style. But when you're just making up a story, this is a convenient narration tempo. And THAT's why I don't believe Amber Heard (well, that and the body language). She sounds just like me when I'm just making shit up.
Wow! we've gone back in time! The setup threw me off and I had to check the date several times haha. You brave man for having to watch so much Amber. You deserve a raise for that!
She’s just insane.
“There was whispering”
… “fuck off” 😂😂😂
I have the same reaction as Depp when I am in a situation and I cannot believe what happened to me as I explain it to other people. it is a disbelief smile: this situation cannot/ did not happen to me, it is impossible...
I have so so many thoughts.
1. Elaine saying this is a set back for all women is entirely untrue. You should believe anyone who claims abuse, unless there is evidence to prove otherwise. In this case there was evidence that proved otherwise. If anything, I think amber had too much "evidence" that didn't back up any of the claims she was making. For example, a bruise on her arm that somehow proved he had repeatedly punched her in the face while wearing rings. Her face was visible in that picture and didn't appear to be bruised or swollen. I think she would've been much more likely to be believed, and even potentially could have won the case if her narrative was that she was emotionally and psychologically abused, or that he physically hurt her in ways that could go intentionally unnoticed(because they're both in the public eye) but instead she made grandiose claims that she could not back up, and it made everything she said sound unbelievable. That doesn't mean people will automatically stop believing women, it means they just didn't believe her.
Also, Elaine is intentionally misrepresenting what the UK case was even about, and that's frustrating.
Elaine and Amber both saying there's no way the jury could've not seen what the media was portraying is a slap in the face to the people who served on that jury. They gave up weeks of their lives and took a vow not to look at outside information. Is it possible some of them didn't follow that vow? Sure. But to say there was no way they could avoid it is just untrue, and incredibly inappropriate considering they had no evidence to back it up.
I could go on and on, but the last thing I want to say is, Amber saying "coming from the lawyer of the man who convinced the world he had scissors for fingers" is probably the funniest shit I've ever heard and maybe the worst way I could imagine someone trying to divert the question. Watching that literally gave me second hand embarrassment.
I've never heard someone call a frown a mouth shrug 🤣 I like it
As an abuse survivor he displays classic survival mannerisms. The quirky smile is a coping mechanism. My heart hurt for him. A survivor can recognize another survivor as well as the mannerisms of the abuser. We have had to read our abusers in order to survive or to hopefully placate and avoid the next attack. An abuse victim is NOT going to stare daggers at their abuser. Whereas depp NEVER looks at heard.
@@sweetembrace6706 nope
That's exactly right...
Kelly Frost-cook, I know what you’re saying exactly!! I survived a decade plus of pure nightmares and would NEVER glare at him (the ex), like that, even today! (As my survival instincts kick in!) I also don’t think I’d even consider starting a fight or slinging insults at my ex- as the smallest act of defiance would result with an ER trip; (although usually the following day when he went to work), so I could properly care for my injuries.
Yeah, I have this tendency when talking about bad or sad experiences too. It was one of the things that made me believe his story because I could feel myself making the same gesture if I were to tell the same story. It is a coping thing that some of us do. It is so bad that you are sort of trying to softening things both for your own sake and others because you have probably tried telling them before and gotten too sad or too distraught looks from others...
With all due respect, i think the coping mechanism is independent of abuse.
I have never experienced abuse and smile (and sometimes make jokes) as soon as I am stressed or deeply hurt. that means I smile at funerals and am the funniest patient at my dentist. just to give 2 examples.
and again, with all due respect and to clarify that I am not denying survivors this coping mechanism; my core message is that I have experienced for myself that this mechanism is independent of abuse.
His father used to hide from his mother during her rage tantrums. He talks about how he never wanted to be in a relationship where he must hide from his partner as his father did. I think the disgust you see is him being disgusted with having let the cycle continue.
Have you ever considered analyzing iconic (or terrible) TV/Film performances and explaining why an actor is (or isn’t) convincing from a nonverbal analysis standpoint? I think it would be really interesting to explore the scientific side of performance art, which tends to appear very unscientific at first glance.
OBSERVE, here's an EXCELLENT IDEA (see Reilly's comment - the original poster)! Last night, I watched a docu-short on Kevin Spacey. SO MANY WOMEN loved him, and refused to believe the allegations about him until the allegations were made very clear by multiple victims.
My first reaction when I saw Spacey in a movie was, "Very good actor; very dark man." He creeped me out, and I knew it was not just the character he was playing. (The movie was American Beauty, and I watched only one scene.)
Spacey has a magnetism that both attracts and repels -- except few are repelled. What is it that I picked up on, that a long thread of women under that docu-short video did not pick up on? Was it because they thought he was hetero and into fully grown women, possibly even them ("Kevin and I would be soooo good together!"), so they disregarded all Creep Cues? What are the Creep Cues, and why do so many people miss the cues? How does the body language of an actor playing a creep differ from a creepy actor playing a creep?
This is a brilliant idea!!!!!! 👏 Also such an excellent way for OBSERVE to further explain the intricacies of body language, && what it means & doesn’t mean through the artistic lenses of an actor/actress!
This is an excellent idea!
That is a fascinating idea!! I'd love to see that.
Yes, would be super interesting!! Might spoil watching tv for us forever though, but worth it haha
I smile when I have to talk about really difficult stuff as I don’t want the person listening to be so badly impacted and to protect myself. I used to think people must think I’m not being serious about it but then my therapist pointed out how it was my way of protecting myself from the enormity of what happened and giving off the demeanour of “I’m ok and I’m handling this”. I totally get why JD did this
Yes, I've done this my whole adult life.
Same
Absolutely, when you have experience pain, distress, humiliation you don’t want to be the source of those feelings in others. I think Johnny and many others uses a smile in this situation to try and ease the discomfort for the other person.
Agreed. To me, it's a smile of irony, not pleasure. "That should never have happened, but it did." Smile, shrug.
Me too. My mom died last year, and when people ask me how I’m doing, I often give a fake smile to try to suppress the overwhelming pull to breakdown.
I believe that the reason Johnny appeared to correct himself, "not hiding, locked myself into" was because A) she knew where he was so he wasn't actually hiding, and B) she had ridiculed him about exposing the fact that he was a male domestic violence victim. It would have been incredibly difficult given his stature as a major male movie star to have to admit that he was living in circumstances where he had to lock himself in rooms for his own safety. It would also be very difficult to recall and discuss having a portion of a finger cut off. I'm sure the half smiles were done in order to keep his composure and not call her the "bitch" that she deserved to be called.
Johnny was abused as a child (his mother was a lot like AH). Children from such families deal with the abuse by laughing about it. "Remember when Mom went after you with a broom? **chuckles** You hid under a bed, and Mom was jabbing at you under the bed!" **snickers**
"Yeah! She was NUTS!" **laughs** That was a twin bed, so by the time Mom calmed down and left me alone, I rolled out from under the bed, covered in broom bruises -- but no dust bunnies! Not in Mom's house!" **everyone laughs** Everyone: "No dust in _my_ house!" **laughter subsiding, as everyone remembers the crazy scene**
Smiling, grinning, laughing about terrible abuse is a coping strategy. When you grow up in a violent home, you either become violent, or you find yourself laughing off the abuse. It allows you to deal with little by little, so that you don't become fragile or broken.
@@rubynibs Yes, our family was the same way. My mother used to bounce a fork off her children's heads, and although she stopped doing that by the time I arrived (probably because my father finally intervened), it was always treated as a funny story by my sibs.
@@rubynibs I agree Ruby. This is the most likely reason he does not (internally) like the (real) term 'hide' .
For me, sometimes I will smile or laugh to keep from crying. Maybe there is some of that left over from telling the story or remembering the story or his past trauma, he's not on the edge of crying anymore, but he still smiles and chuckles a lot to maintain composure, to keep from thinking about the details which may cause crying.
@@pieternel101 Yep. As a child, he always ran and hid when his crazy mother started on a tear. AH, being the charming one that she is, mostly like taunted JD about "hiding" when she went on her tears. We know she taunted him about "running away." She goes right for the nerve. The thing is, walking away from her was the best strategy, yet she turned it against him, knowing of his childhood. (I feel my dinner coming up just thinking about how AH treated JD -- and we only heard the tip of the iceberg. She has no clue how despised she is.)
Insults can sound like white noise when your abuser is constant with them. You sort of…check out. I think that’s what Johnny is referring to. So used to her throwing them at him constantly she was just doing the same thing as she always does it became white noise.
Thank you for your excellent content, per usual. Love the compilation.
Yesss!! Exactly!
That is what i thought as well, it could also be that he was just making it worse but still saying that she was insulting him or just screaming from shock and making noises won't change anything because she cut his finger and burned his cheek with his cigarette after, so it really doesn't matter if while u were beating a dog u were saying sorry or just insulting it, the result still the same.
And even if you're too dissociated to register what you hear around you as words, you may not necessarily be too disconnected to recognize the tone they're speaking in.
Well said. I remember tuning my mother out a lot when she would yell at me or my dad. I do remember certain insults, like her telling me when I was seven years old, that I should have been aborted. That one still hurts.
I think that is possible. I heard the audio of after the finger cutting and Amber was hysterical screaming and crying. Maybe that was the white noise and he didn’t remember specifics of insults she was saying to him. Or maybe he assumed she was yelling insults. Either way I don’t think it’s a huge red flag. I think he was a victim of severe abuse by her.
I started going to therapy again this year, and through that was finally actually diagnosed with ptsd. My therapist has been helping me through saying out loud and fully processing what caused it, but I never just realized how much I smile/smirk - and even laugh inappropriately while trying to relive and discuss it. It’s like, it’s so dark that it almost feels ridiculous, and really what else CAN I do but laugh?
So I definitely related to that part of Johnny’s body language, if that is the same thing he is doing
I really enjoy these videos, too. You do a really great job explaining what you see and I feel like I’ve learned so much since finding your channel
I’m glad you have found help through therapy and are healing! I also express my emotions really weirdly, and struggle to communicate feelings of even identify them at any given time - I think that’s the concept of the baseline because there’s enough room for intricacies in body language interpretation. I have OCD and depression and I always feel like I would look so guilty even if I didn’t do something, but I think interrogators get kind of used to that stuff *fingers crossed*
That’s great! My therapist keeps retraumatizing me. I don’t feel heard or understood
@@mermaiddiyartist8119 throw his ass bro and find a new one, finding a good therapist is hard but it's worth it.
I'm pretty sure that is how humans interact when they are talking about a traumatizing situation to help us relax and not feel fear or negative emotions and that is probably why when he heard the audio record of them fighting his face was full with fear, concern and a lot of emotions even though that audio was way less traumatizing than remembering cutting ur finger and seeing ur bones but that was because he couldn't smile or make fun of the audio while listening to it and he could only remember it and imagine himself in this situation again.
Same here, when my therapist referred to the stress I experience around my mother as "post traumatic stress' I laughed out loud. I didn't realize how bad it was. To me it was normal.
I’m so glad that the cameras were allowed in the court room traditional media would’ve been never let us in on everything that we saw with our own eyes… traditional media has continued to paint Amber as a victim - those of us that actually watched the trial saw the evidence and found that Johnny was the victim!!!
🎯💯
Amber and her team didn’t want the cameras there. Jonny and his team is the reason we got to see this. They knew we weren’t going to believe Amber if it was a public trail.
Bingo! That’s why Johnny fought so hard to get those cameras in. If AH had won. We wouldn’t have been able to tell her lie’s from the transcripts alone. Also MSM would’ve spun the narrative, to keep her as a “victim”. Not only was it the correct thing to do, but the only thing to do. We haven’t had “Free Press” and unbiased journalist in decades. As we all witnessed, the ridiculous PR stunts and narrative provided by AH team though the MSM. Shame on them all. Also while trying to cancel all the YT channels that were reporting the truth. As AH has been screaming her “Right’s”to free speech. WTF?! It’s only okay if you agree with their side. Otherwise they cancel you. What has me so really pissed off to the hilt. Is claiming that everyone is “Johnny Depp Fan’s”! NO, Nope it’s not true. We just saw who was the real Victim in these cases, and it’s not AH. While all the real DV/SA survivors were disgusted and horrified by her lies and manipulation’s.
Literally no one is pushing the narrative that amber is a victim....well maybe her n Elaine lol but no one else
Right? When I first heard about this I thought she must be telling the truth. What a fool I was!
So she originally said the whole door thing was her escaping Johnny. But in reality it was Johnny escaping her. She hit him due to the door scraping her toes. 🙄
I think a lot of what she claimed happened to her was what she did to him. It was really messed up.
She kicked the door into his face when he opened it to try check on her and her claim of an injured foot.
How are her lawyers allowed to behave the way they do?? That alone is embarrassing. They are definitely right up Amber's alley.
And if they're planning to appeal, how could Elaine go on these interviews and talk about this "mountain of evidence that wasn't allowed in the trial"? AH's entire team are enablers and ridiculous.
Who else would take amber as a client? I like tmz guy - he called her out
I'm shocked the judge let things happen like that in the UK: attorney bickering, whispering, eating, etc.
@@emilykelly5253 I was thinking the same thing..despite what we all think of her she has the resources to hire the best of the best in legal representation..and I think she ended up with her team because she prob had consultations and other people didn’t want to take her case because of the amount of evidence against her + she’s difficult to work with and I’m sure all the signs were there she’s nuts and this wasn’t going to end well.
@@PandoraLockhart - I didn’t know the Judge in the UK allowed those things like what we see here in the 2016 US Deposition.
Excuse me sir, what makes you think we want videos under 30 minutes? 😊 I’d watch you all night. (I don’t mean that in a creepy way)
I was so excited to see this was over an hour. I kept checking the time to see if I saw it correctly.
I love these longer videos! I hope he does more of them!
Isn't it funny how Amber's lawyer the one who kept asking every witness from Johnny's side if they were just here for the 15 mins of fame, is actually going above and beyond and appearing in different interviews just for fame ? Like the case ended dear just move on and find a new client and maybe reread some law books because you and your team's questions were horrible.
So do I have to even remind Elaine,that AMBER,herself,on the stand,in this very trial,admitted that the freakin Op-Ed was actually,indeed written about Johnny Depp..🤣 wtf
They also need to be reminded that they are the ones who brought social media to the jury.
Neither AH or Elaine can just straight up answer a question, they always answer a question with a question. My life experience has shown me, ppl that do that are either lying, gaslighting or manipulating.
The feeling I get with JD’s half smirk with certain event calling is thinking back and feeling disgust &/or shame for the memory he’s recalling… and kinda having to laugh at a ridiculous thing kinda like what some people do instead or to stop themselves from crying or getting upset about the event(s). When I think of negative events that I hate thinking about or acknowledging I kinda do the same. My dad did the same. It’s kinda like laughing in shame of the event. …. Sorry for the horrible horrible rambling/explanation of that. I’m horrible with words and trying to explain myself.
I understand this. You’re not rambling. 💕
I do the same thing. It’s sort of like laughing to keep from crying.
I took it that way as well. The smirk and the laugh was him feeling shame for allowing himself to get into the situation and what he put up with. A lot of people do it even when they are victims. I’m sorry for what you went through.
Exactly.
My parents forced the idea that I needed to smile when I was upset and that I should laugh when angry or scared. I now know they did that so they didn’t have to address that I was experiencing negative emotions. It maybe a sign of abuse. “You need to smile, we’re going to do everything to make smile or laugh. Now that you have, you must have been lying the whole time”
It’s interesting to note how Elaine and the AH team blames Johnny being famous for people not believing AH, while at the same time trying to lean into the whole “this is a setback for women who are victims” thing. A.) it’s actually a step forward for all victims because it shows that the truth will come out and you can have your day in court. B.) by playing into that idea of being a setback, they acknowledge that people have an emotional response to it, and tend to want to believe the victim nowadays. But they say that people just throw that out of the window because it’s Johnny Depp.
The reality is, people believed AH for 6 years, because we took her surface level claims at face value and believed her because she claimed to be a victim. It was only after she got on the stand and elaborated on those surface level claims that people started to see that she was lying. Her believability was not dependent on or really had anything to do with Johnny at all. She did that all on her own. And remember, when she first took the stand, people wanted to believe her because it doesn’t sit well with us that someone would lie about such graphic and upsetting trauma, and most people didn’t want to accept the fact that they believed her and supported her and blamed the actual victim for 6 years, so the odds were really stacked in favor of AH’s testimony being believed, and yet she still was so obviously manipulative and lying that she wasn’t believed and Johnny got justice.
So very much all of this! I was never a huge Depp fan and just kind of shrugged, esp after the UK case, since libel there is often easier to prove. But everything I have seen and read since this channel convinced me to take a deeper look, especially what Heard has said and done herself, have convinced me that he is the real victim.
Yeah I didn't think twice when he was accused of domestic violence - I did think twice during the trial
Amber and her team will say whatever they believe makes them look in a positive way.
Amber did not believe the world would believe Johnny, that's why she was so adamant while she was condescendingly telling him to tell the world!
She knew no one would believe him!
Until the tapes aired, until we saw her lies at the trial. That's why Elaine and her hate social medias, it's because they wanted to keep it private, they would have been able to control the narrative.
Amber said in the NBC interview that she didn't think some things mattered to decide if she was believable or not.
It seems like Amber watched all these body language videos of her and thought of trying to be more of a convincing victim by WAY OVER acting during the trial in Virginia and she failed 👎
Notification squad
As an abuse survivor Johnny’s description of the white noise makes sense to me. I would dissociate in and out while being screamed at so while I don’t know exactly what was said I know it was a lot of insults. But when you’re in your head it does kinda sound like white noise too. Dissociation is hard to explain if you haven’t experienced it.
I have. And I do.
This. Exactly this. I still do it when there’s stuff going on around me, even if it doesn’t necessarily involve me.
Hey dear, I’m hard of hearing and I would love if CC worked or the transcript was available, please please please? I feel like I miss so much trying to hear the video and also read everyone’s lips! I love your videos so much.
Agree.
You have to turn it on.
cc works for me when I turn it on
It’s working for me too. It’s the button on the upper right hand side of the screen
I checked and it’s working for me too. You have to hit the gear (settings) and hit closed captioning and turn it on.
NO! Johnny Depp is not a "trained on-screen talent." Amber is! She's trained, she has an acting coach.
Johnny is a character actor. It's an entirely different thing. He doesn't perform parts like a trained actor. He performs characters. He creates them and inhabits them.
These types of acting are two entirely different things. No director is ever gonna tell Johnny how to play the part, he'll just walk. Amber has been trained to perform emotions and such, and she's not good at it.
Two entirely different things, but unfortunately they're both called "acting."
What a really good and interesting point. I never thought about his acting in the way but that is so true.
Exactly! Excellent point.
She really showed the lack of talent she had. Her acting coaches should be embarrassed. It was so awkward to see her try to go for it and then not be able
To produce tears but change her voice and facial expressions as if she was crying. Cringe
Hi, JD have said in interview that he isn`t acting but Re-acting.And if he was playing he would have been lying.
His own way to make a character real and believed. :)
I think they, Johnny’s team, wanted the trial to be public was because of how the media was twisting the outcome. Blaming the Judge, witnesses, and the jury, saying that they were all on Johnny’s payroll. The networks are all saying that this is a step back for women making it obvious that they weren’t watching the trial themselves. A lot of them give off the vibe of “I couldn’t be bothered”
I'm glad it was televised because majority of us now know how much of a bad liar AH is.
@@ManderzArl when Amber pulled that scissors for fingers quote I felt embarrassed like i would’ve asked if she wanted to redo that answer.
The judge was the one who suggested it, JD’s team agreed, Amber’s fought against it.
So it was the judge who originally thought of it.
Legacy Media continues to push the narrative.
The issue most people had with Amber was she described horrific violence against her. Horrific violence of being slammed into walls hit multiple times in the head. It was some of the worst abuse allegations I’ve ever heard. But then she showed photos with no injury and pretended like they showed injury. It honestly made me feel like I was living in an alternate universe. That was the issue not that Johnny was more famous. And I think she didn’t have photos of injuries because she actually wasn’t injured because she wasn’t a victim of violence by him.
It was also evident she was trying to tell stories favorable to her. She was trying so hard!
She also said she was raped with a bottle that may or may not have been broken. Yet, she says in the interview that the trial results were the (paraphrasing) worst thing she's ever experienced and it was the trial results that made her feel the most dehumanized. Really? All that supposed abuse didn't make her feel dehumanized? But the trial did?
Emma, I absolutely agree! There wasn’t the extent of injuries on her should have been easily identified IF what she said was actually true! On top of that, her assistant she claimed she terminated for “drinking on the job” came out to accuse AH of “stealing her real life SA” and claiming Depp did that to her! Just so disgusting!
She even stole her ex pa's sa story and told it as her own ... It's sick ... To me it seems she tried to backtrack to come up with evidence and it was found the pics weren't authentic... Then they proved the bruise kit situation... She's a mess... Didn't care she tried to ruin his life ... She took absolutely no accountability for anything ... She's a Disgrace
If he would have done any of what she alleges she would have been in the hospital several times. If someone gets punched in the face several times with rings like JD’s there would be serious wounds. Ridiculous
I’m amazed she was believed by anyone at the UK trial.😳
Her person is virtually screaming “I am not a credible witness”. 🤦♂️
She was heavily encouraged by the media at that time, maybe they got influenced by that or just didn't want to get roasted by said medias
The judge literally has personal connections to Amber, his wife is friends with another woman who is friends with Amber. Also, the judge's son works for The Sun, and Johnny was suing them. Johnny had no chance in the UK basically, it was dumb to go up against an actual powerful man like Rupert Murdoch. That UK judge literally ruled that "Amber couldn't have thrown a redbull can at JD because she doesn't drink redbull". He also believed her because he believed that she donated all of the money, therefore he ruled that she's not a "gold digger" - however, now we know that she DIDN'T donate the money. The UK judgement is very flawed. He didn't even believe some of her stories, he basically threw out the bottle r@pe story because it's extremely obvious that it didn't happen. If she lied about the bottle r@pe, why did he believe the other stuff? She was a very unreliable witness, yet he still took her word even though all evidence was against her. All of her evidence is hearsay - the audios completely destroy all of her stories. She's not credible, and the judge shouldn't have took her word - but he was probably just protecting himself and doing everything he could to protect The Sun. The Sun is notorious for trashing everyone - the things they've written about Michael Jackson make the "wife beater" article about JD look like child play. Johnny never should have sued them in the first place.
She had connections with the judge. She only won because of that, no jury and a biased judge. I'm pretty sure only her 'evidence' was submitted in the UK case.
@@mdnblues I hear ya 🙂✌️
The UK case was about the Sun. The owner of the paper is very powerful. I genuinely don't think it was anything to do with her. The judge was going to rule in favour of the paper come what may. Heard and her team don't seem to realise this, they think they 'won' it was the Sun that won and would have regardless.
When she's talking about that scenario where she actually confesses to hitting ("not punching") him, she's having a hard time describing what was physically going on during that exchange because, in her mind, what she is doing is flipping the facts where she is in Johnny's shoes and he is in hers because the truth of the matter is, in that scenario, she was not trying to escape Johnny and shutting the door to keep him out. She's recollecting what he was doing because she was the pursuer and abuser and he was fleeing her relentless pursuit of him. In retelling this, she is flipping the script which must be difficult to do in real time but she is retelling it AKA lying saying that she was fleeing him. She's the one who was chasing him room to room and he is the one who is trying to close the door to keep her out and she is the one who kicked the door after he bent down to check on the foot of her (making a utility of his empathy for misdirection) that she just feigned he damaged with the top of the door... At which point she kicked the door and it slammed into his face. And retelling this, she's flipping everything around and imagining yourself and his shoes. She's like a very sneaky, manipulative squid; constantly prepared to Sully the waters / employ misdirection, call upon his empathy, engage him in a circular argument / word salad/ strawman argument... All with intention to Cloud the issue at hand / confuse her opponent / apply deceit and deception ; anything but acknowledge any wrongdoing / take any blame. Just like a very annoying magician with her misdirection. Part of her scarfing down all That snack material is misdirection by the way, while she concocts the next lie while onlookers watch her crunch on snacks.
She didn’t punch him. She doesn’t the exact way he was hit with her hand. But he wasn’t punched. Duh.
@@hayleywest4942 She hit him none the less.
Some of the other ways she has described the trial track very much with this line of thinking. She’s not talking about her own emotions, she’s saying what she thinks he would say or what other victims of abuse would say. Which is part of why it rings hollow.
Strawman argument! This is the word of the month. Even her supporters use strawman arguments when _trying_ to defend her. They bring up the UK trial which has very little in common with this defamation trial. They say that “she won” that the UK trial, when she wasn’t even a party. She was just a witness. They either don’t understand, or refuse to acknowledge that the UK has very different laws and very different thresholds in regards to defamation and it wasn’t a jury of 7 people who decided the verdict together, like in this trial, but one judge (and one _very biased_ judge at that, imo.)
I’ve debated tons of AH supporters since the verdict in the US defamation trial and, either they didn’t watch this trial _at all,_ or they refuse to acknowledge what actually happened. They try to say that a lot of _her_ evidence was “suppressed” when really, she FAILED TO SUBMIT a lot of _her_ evidence because she knew it looked really bad for her. Her supporters talk about how the the audio used in the trial were only 20 clips and therefore didn’t display the whole story and left out context, except the jury had access to ALL of the audio. It was just the audience that didn’t have access during the trial, which didn’t matter as _we_ weren’t the ones deciding the verdict. And even having access to the _full_ audio, this jury _still_ sided with JD and ruled that AH did indeed defame him. (I don’t really count their ruling that _he_ also defamed _her_ because I really don’t think that was fair. HE didn’t say those words, his attorney did.)
They build all these “arguments” on outright fallacies. I have to wonder if anyone who defends her after watching the US defamation trial (and _isn’t_ getting paid) actually watched the same trial as I did? HOW can they still defend her after all the times she was outright caught in lies? I just don’t get it.
I would like for you to evaluate O. J. Simson. I just watched it and obviously, he was guilty and paid his way out of it but I would like to hear you do him. I am sorry, I hate this woman and can't watch her anymore. The truth is not in her.
I agree an O.J. video would be very interesting
I LOST it at Logan's "there was WhIsPeRiNg... F**k off!" 🤣🤣🤣
Damn, tell us how you REALLY feel my dude!
This trial/dynamic was a real guilty distractor for me. So much scary sh*t going on in the world - I really love watching your take on all this!✨
But it was also too important to make visible make visible the fact that not all women tell the truth, many accuse men of violence when the violent person is the woman, but many decide to believe the woman simply because of her sex or gender, without listening to the other version.
Real sad fact is, that many men have stood up and lost simply because they were males and not LBGT. Despite having enough evidence. This hopefully will help more males stand up!!
legit. im a little ashamed of how much time ive spent on this....
Same it was truly a good distraction
While this Trial was a distraction, It was also a huge win for people who have been abused by a Cluster B personality, (Narcissistic, Borderline, Histrionic), especially when their abuser was a women.
I have really been enjoying your content, and I do like that you try to go in blind.
The mutual abuse thing is just eugh to me though - it's such a misconception and actually is a term which can harm victims. Abuse connotes control.
Please please know, if you are in a situation where you are being abused: It is not your fault. You are not 'an abuser' if you fight back or send angry messages to your friends about your abuser. You can still be believed and supported and there are people who can help you. Stay safe and leave if you can - I know it's not always possible - BUT YOU ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE for their behaviour towards you. 💜
The forced positivity thing around the 22 min mark really got me. This is what I do when recalling the events that contributed to my CPTSD. My coping mechanism is humor, I often do this so the other person doesn’t become uncomfortable or sad and to downplay the trauma for myself so I don’t dissociate. I am working on this with a therapist but it is interesting to see someone else doing something similar.
The part of “not hiding” is because when he was trying to keep himself safe from Amber, she was basically calling him a coward and saying he was “hiding,” being a “baby” and other stuff. I had an ex do the same thing to me when I tried to hide from them. It’s awful.
I watched this whole trial nd my heart and soul felt so bad for him and how she mistreated him
Me too…she’s literally dangerous. Imagine putting a cigarette out on someone’s effing face??? And after all she KNOWS she did to him, she can still lie about all of it…project it all on him essentially swapping places with him. So so so sad.
She was so enraged he didn’t have her in his will right off the bat! I think she planned on killing him! In my opinion, she would have blamed it on substances. Just my opinion. She just would not and still has not quit talking about him!
About stairs & sister: In this depo, she's emotionally reacting (anger) to a FANTASY, just like she did many times with Johnny. She ACTS on things that haven't happened, things she thinks might happen in the future that only live in her head,
Very good point !
I assume Elaine thought she could run all over JD's team because of the UK trial.
I think JD has that smirk from lightening situations with his mother, his mother wasn't stable.
Ah admitted on audio "I can't promise I won't ever get physical again". That's at least twice of self admitting.
What I noticed about AH is she just keeps rambling on & on about herself & says things that others should be saying about her instead. But since everything is a lie, she has to say those things herself. You can just feel that these are the conversations that people build in their heads when they take a bath or so. But through Johnny she finally got an audience to word vomit this shit onto, trying to paint herself as something she never was. That's also exactly what she did when sie tried to talk herself into victimhood, when she was never the victim to begin with.
I want one of these interviewers to ask "Elaine, are you ACTUALLY NOT AWARE that Amber was not a party in the UK trial? Or, are you just trying to obscure the facts?"
what if anything are you aware of Elaine 🤣 but definitely the latter...
It's really hard to get a baseline for her because she lies so often.
And she does it so confidently.
I feel like the only thing she didn't lie about during the entire trial was when she said the trial was the worst thing thats happened to her. I'm thinking to myself well of course it is bcuz the abuse never happened! Literally every word out of her mouth was a lie. I could have cared less to watch the trial and don't give two shits about either of them, never heard of amber and never saw any movies with Depp or heard in them. I went into this knowing absolutely nothing and could still tell she lied thru the entire thing. Any time Johnny spoke it was extremely genuine. He had no reason to lie about anything and it came across with every word. The min amber hit the stand, it was like watching that stupid jodi aries all over again. So glad she got schooled by Camille.
That's her baseline 🤣
I noticed during the trial that Depp did that half-smirk thing a few times, where it doesn't reach his eyes. One of the things it seemed to correlate with was when recalling events that were traumatic. He did it a few times when recalling his mother's abuse of him and his siblings.
He even laughed when recalling it once - the kind of laugh that isn't funny but is more like, "I can't believe this actually happened", and "I can't believe I'm really saying this in public". I've used that laugh when I've been in therapy. It really is half-hilarious and half-tragic when you're recalling things that are that crazy.
Amber: “I don’t know what part of my body I put between my sister and Johnny…”…
Hmm, Perhaps Pinocchio could suggest what body part? 🤔🤷♂️
15:23 Not only did she take all that time to think, but she absolutely RUSHED to get that food into her mouth before they finished asking her the question. Her behavior with that food was actually gross...she acted like a child who couldn't wait for their meal and keeps sneaking snacks; wiping her hands on her clothing, etc. She's so distracted by her snackies that she can't concentrate on the issue at hand? Maybe a grown-up should take them from her.
11 mins in and I could scream! I think I have watched most of everything - her passive aggressive answers which have been caught out as lies in the trial, the head tilts, her total coldness in her eyes - the eating thing? ARGGH She is reptilan. The small smile he gives is when he is talking about the uglier and more hurtful things. During the trial she sat there with her jaw up with some haughty superior way - JD was 100% authentic and also sad. As for Elaine - she is ludicrous. She is skirting defamation. And she is incorrect when talking about the Uk case which was against the newspaper and that thing called A was a third party. JD wanted it to have cameras because he wanted the truth out there. The sadness is he used to love that thing. I would bet the majority of her ugliness occured once they married. Elaine possibly past her use by date. And she could have easily left from her penthouse and JD was away at times so unike DV VICTIMS she had the money to do so.She is so awful. Repugnant
Them stressing that the article didn't say his name is the same energy as a sibling saying "I'm not touching you"
Lol
I would really love for captions to be made available so I'm able to watch an enjoy your content when it's uploaded. I find myself forgetting you've posted a video because I wait for captions to be available and I never end up watching. I love your content when I can watch it!
@Observe this would be fantastic. I know the same is true for my sister as well. Shes mentioned it a handful of times. Idk the backend of YT but judging from many other creators content there is a way to have it up simultaneously.
If you use the CC button on the screen (upper right on mobile or lower right on PC) it should switch on captions.
@@katfromthekong414 appreciate the response. However, when video is posted and you hit that button, you don't get captions but a message saying they are unavailable for the first few hours. On other channels when a video is first posted and I hit captions, it works right away .
@@juliannacolombo5584 oh I see, wasn't aware of that. Sorry that I wasn't able to help then
@@katfromthekong414 Thanks for trying 💕
This was so interesting to rewatch, it is so obviously clear.. I think JD is known as a very private person… to have to expose himself like this would have taken extreme efforts. I am so glad to know that 98% of the world watching this, were able to decipher who the real abuser is, and how DANGEROUS giving “Carte Blanche” to one sex without “dangly bits”, without question is….
JD, this is, and will be, one of the most important roles in your life, and that is a role in a documentary, a documentary of massive importance to real “equality”, fairness and truth.. Thankyou…..all I thought about the whole way through was protecting our sons, our brothers, our fathers, our uncles and our community.
A couple of lawyers / legal analysts that were present at the trial said there were no such signs of "burn the witch" as Amber claimed.
You just keep getting better and better! Cheers to watching you grow since around 100,000 followers!!
The door hitting incident was him in the bathroom and her knocking over and over again. She really should have written notes of when incidents happened to keep her lies straight. The eating drives me nuts.
Yeah she takes a lot of stories where it seems like she was the aggressor and completely flips it and says Johnny did the exact thing she did. Not only the incident you’re talking about, but also the “pushing her sister down the stairs” thing. According to Johnny and even her sister, as told by her old boss, she was the one who almost pushed her down the stairs, while in her recollection of events Johnny was the one who did it. I’m sure there’s others I can’t think of too
@@melissahourihan2344 did you notice in that depo she said at first her sister came down the stairs then the story changes to run up the stairs to split them up
@@KimberlyRottieMom yup! You’re so right that she shoulda at least written this stuff down to keep her stories straight lol
Well... I WAS going to go to bed...
L I T E R A L L Y
They tried to sway the jury by saying it was about all women abuse victims in their closing arguments. The amount of women and men victims that have connected to Johnny’s story and stood by him in support, Amber spits on them to say they support an abuser
I have seen so many comments pop up on various channels streaming the Depp V Heard court proceedings saying I can’t wait for Observe to make a video. And you never disappoint! Keep it up!
LOVE that this video is dimmed for nightime viewing!! Can't wait to wind down with this!
I think they wanted it so public so that we can see for ourselves who Amber is. If it's televised than she can't go and play victim in front of audiences cause they would have seen it as well.
Thanks a lot for putting this together, I always love watching your videos
Without cameras a win for johnny would have been due to his power,the Turd winning would have wanted her voice in organisations and media.With the cameras all the watchers could make their own mind up ,and we agreed with the jury .
Whoo mega episodes are the best! Hope you and Piper are well 🖤💚
Who cares! Get to *NICHOL KESSINGER* and the newest video of her interview on August 16th, 2018. *PLEASE!!!! I will put up $$*
But this witch could be NKs twin!
I’m only 5 minutes in & I’m so irritated by Amber & her nonchalant attitude about her abuse of Johnny Depp. As if she’s bothered by the questions. She’s so full of herself. JFC.
I’ll edit my comment as necessary.
What makes me SO sick in this case is how AH claims the role of victim in place of Johnny and accuses him of the stuff that *she* actually did to him! It is SO grotesque that she LOST the defamation Trial and is *still* sticking to her lies and slandering JD.
She's like Glen Close's character in the movie, "Fatal Attraction" -- a totally crazy sociopath. Nothing good can come of her vengeful, malicious, cowardly choices.
The 45% dim is just 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
Oh, I know EXACTLY why JD’s team fought so hard for this trial to be televised! SO that the world was WITNESS to the truth, as the main stream media would NEVER have allowed the truth to escape that courtroom!!
I've seen people say "yes" while shaking their head, but I've never seen somebody say "no" while nodding their head, lol.
People do when they’re lying.
She was answering two questions at once. Go back and watch closely. Listen to the rapid question fire of two questions.
@@jessicapearson9479 yes I understand the question, no i didn't do that.
That's what she's 'saying' I don't get why people get tripped up on this one.
I think because the female asking the questions asked them so fast and close together that she misunderstood Amber and because it appears that Logan didn't catch that she was answering two questions at the same time either.
@@jessicapearson9479 No, the question was clear!
*Do you understand the question?* She nods yes but says no. That's inconsistent.
She'd have paused and asked for clarification. Or looked confused!
She doesn't!
Also, even if that was the case, it doesn't explain the inconsistency in her body language and her answer. It's either she's answering to one or to the other.
Amber, we know how hard it has to be to try to tell a story in reversed roles. We know you're trying to place yourself in Johnny's shoes and he in yours. We know it's very difficult because you keep proving it over and over. You don't make any sense!
Has anyone been able to actually find even one example of people threatening to microwave her baby? I haven’t seen any examples. I haven’t seen the death threats either, though, and I’m sure those do exist; I was just wondering.
Curious. Why do you refer to Amber as "they, them" and Johnny as "he, him"?
He says “she/her” several times throughout the video, what do you mean?
On the disgust during his recounting of hiding or locking himself in a room: it would make her more upset and more explosive when he would do this. Leaving an argument, in any way, has shown to make her livid. As someone who who's reacted this way to people yelling at me since I was a kid, I can say it feels gross. When you're doing it, you don't feel safe. You know you're making it worse by doing that, and you wish the situation weren't so intense that you feel unsafe. You know what's happening to you is wrong, and hiding is wrong. You feel shameful for everything, I guess. Thinking back on it later, sometimes it's gross how much of a coward you were and how you shouldn't have given up on fighting for yourself. Sometimes you feel like you should have been able to handle your emotions and just hear the other person out. It's complicated, frustrating and hard to understand why you can't just deal with a situation
Anyone else rewatching this and thinking/feeling 🤬😳🙄🤯 all over again? 😬😂
OMG ... am I the only one to notice the massive contradiction coming from AH's mouth in this interview? She literally devotes the entire interview to dismissing EVERY allegation made against her. Even in those recordings - where she so clearly seemed to accept that she had "started fights" and had been "hitting" Johnny - she claims that she only said these things because she felt it was the only way to save herself from the deadly rage of her abuser. Yet when Savannah suggests that she may have lost the case because she "refused to admit to any wrong doing", AH suddenly remembers: "I DID and said dreadful, HORRIBLE THINGS" during that 'toxic' relationship! Things that were so bad she now claims "I don't even recognise myself today"!!
BINGO!!
So now Amber - if you want to be believed - you can drop the pretence that you did nothing wrong and tell us exactly WHAT WERE the horrible things you did?
Johnny is at fault
The Jury is at fault
The Judge is at fault (this judge, not the other one)
Johnnys Jack Sparrow character is at fault
Johnnys fans are at fault
Johnnys lawyers are at fault
Johnnys employees are at fault
Johnnys friends are at fault
TMZ is at fault
Social media is at fault
Randos are at fault
Her legal team is at fault
Did I leave anything or anybody out? QUESTION; If she goes thru life, always believing it's everyone else who is at fault when things go wrong or turn bad, wouldn't she just automatically think it was Johnny fault anyways??
Why does Amber suddenly become a ‘they’ when you’re reacting to her in her interview near the end?
I'm still in shock that after everything "She Claimed" he did to her that she still loves him. She is so weird.
I think she's using "love" and "obsessed with" interchangeably.
She should despise her abuser, right?
Remember in her interview she said that the backlash she received from the captain Jack Sparrow fans during the trial was the most horrible and humiliating thing that ever happened to her. I'd argue heavily that if you were an abuse victim at the hands of your beloved husband, that would probably be a lot more horrible of an experience.. She describes s-e-*-u-a-l assault with a bottle that actually broke and glass was left inside and she was cut 😨😱 Clearly it's a purely fantastical story, not only because there is no way something like this would go without medical attention, but arguably violent r-a-p-e and injury would be the most horrible experience of your life, not the lack of support from Jack Sparrow fans... She clearly has no understanding of what that kind of assault does to a woman... She doesn't know what is the true horrible experience like this because IT'S NEVER HAPPENED TO HER. So I have no doubt that in her twisted way she still loves him, obsesses about him and regrets she destroyed the marriage. She is enraged because he rejected her and seeks revenge...
13:43 I believe she was taking a cue from her lawyer. He tried to object with "the audio speaks for itself" so she simply confirmed the content of the audio. It's a brilliant way of avoiding adding new, verifiable information that could be disproved later on. I still think she's foul, but she's not stupid.
She's not that bright either: she made several mistakes, like parakeet instead of parquet, and, "my dog stepped on a bee".
She was probably instructed to display emotions that made her think about something sad, something that hurt her, like her dog stepping on a bee...and instead, she read it out loud!
I think the smirk that pops up and hesitation before answering about his finger is this internal speak of "and I can't believe I lied about this to protect her, look where we are now". To me its the 'I'm a fool' realization... this serious injury was muddied up because he lied about the origin to keep her out of trouble
Not long woke up, it's just after 5am here and I see you upload, it's gonna be a good day 👍😉
It was public because Johnny figured even if he lost he could earn the public opinion regardless
The reason everyone went team Johnny so quick and steadfast is pretty obvious in my opinion. Not only her, but also her legal team simply couldn't seem to take even an ounce of accountability and it's strange that the legal team ran with the finger pointing narrative.
Whoever her attorney is, is driving me bonkers with his snooty attitude 🤦🏻♀️. Like his client is above giving a direct answer. And who’s directing this deposition? The judge or her attorney??
YES! I’ve been holding off on any analysis of this waiting for my boy observe!
I don't know why she's eating it always drove me nuts, so disrespectful and inappropriate.
Well done good man. He's known abuse personally. He deals with it the exact way as he always has. What worked for him in the past to deal with it, he still holds onto-to try to remove himself. The two things he has always done with his abusers is remove himself, yet still protect them for love's sake. He is indeed consistant in every part of his being. However, Amber takes great steps in her manipulation to take on the role of victim, take the money this man worked for his entire life, and maintain a celebrity lifestyle that she clearly thinks she'd worthy of. HE tried to protect her, even after it all. SHE tried to ruin him from the beginninng for her own selffish means. Even if I was completely deaf, the truth of it all is without question PROVEN.
I think she is always coked out so it's extremely hard to focus, that is why her eyes are always darting around.
Nice one, thanks for putting this together.
I absolutely love how AH bitches about being dehumanised by Jonny's team while dehumanising Johnny, reducing him to a character. In attempts to say a pirate must be an abuser and yall are in love with that. Lol
I’m so psyched, I’ve been waiting to see your analysis of this situation!
same here!
Same!
She couldn't be truthful for the post-trial interview, either.
If there were signs calling for harm against AH, her supporters would have taken pictures and posted them around the internet. As far as I know, there haven't even been poorly photoshopped signs to support this claim.
She talks as if the benches were full of people in pirate costumes and being vocally disruptive, yet the court's own cameras showed nobody in outlandish costumes and the judge warned the audience to keep quiet or respectful if there was too much whispering.
Freedom of speech means the government can't punish you for voicing displeasure at who's in charge and how they're performing. It does NOT protect you from private businesses or individuals if you spread lies that would negatively impact their future.
That's just what I have a counter to and who knows what other ways she tries to distort the truth as shown (or not shown) in the courtroom broadcast.
She totally slipped up! When she said that she was trying to "get through the door" instead of her running from johnny. And that's exactly what Johnny said!! He was running from her!
"It was the first time a victim testified live". Yup, because he wanted too lol
The part he says he was hiding and you said he showed some level of disgust about it...i took it as he felt disgusted or ashamed maybe that he had to hide from his wife. Probably felt embarrassed admitting he was "hiding" from a woman, like it was a cowardly thing to do maybe...especially since thats what she told him all the time (that he ran away like a coward).
He also testified that is what his Dad used to do also is hide from his Mom. He Never wanted to be Anything like his parents so that's a big part of the disgust he's feeling! 💜🥰💛🥰💜
It was the Judge in the Depp V Heard USA trial who said she wanted the whole trial to be livestreamed. Heards team tried to get the cameras removed from the courtroom but the judge insisted the cameras were staying. I am glad she insisted on that because I got to watch the whole trial streamed live & unedited & therefore I was able form my own unbiased conclusions on who I thought was lying & who I thought was being truthful.
I’m happy for Depp that he has been vindicated. He has paid an enormous price for being with her. She has been exposed as a cruel and unstable person.
Idk why but I love seeing Logan get pissed at Amber's BS
Did anyone else catch the slip up at 1:29:15? "When you are in an abusive relationship (...) You don't have the resources that say you or I do" - She seems to clearly state that she is in fact not a person in a relationship that is lacking in these resources. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't she very clearly reveal her lie here?
Oh the effort you put in for these videos is really something else!! It may go unrecognized, but it’s never unappreciated 🙏
It’s wild going back to the observations of Amber’s first deposition and then listening to her trying to blatantly lie about the toe-door incident. Can’t believe she tried to claim she was escaping an assault when it was her who was trying to continue an altercation banging on the door of the bathroom JOHNNY had run away to to escape HER.