The only available SATA Express device?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- Patreon: / peterbrockie
Twitter: / peterbrockie
IG (rarely tech related): / peterbrockie
Disclosure: Some of the links below are affiliate links. This means that, at zero cost to you, I will earn an affiliate commission if you click through the link and finalize a purchase.
Products used in this video:
ASRock Front USB 3.1 Panel on eBay: ebay.us/5OfaiA
Current Filming Equipment:
Sony FX30: amzn.to/3uTmAzb
Sony A7IV: amzn.to/3uqGsdT
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G lens: amzn.to/3JjOdI5
Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM lens: amzn.to/3ootA4e
Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 G Macro lens: amzn.to/3bFBVYD
RGB Video Light: amzn.to/3eqVGGs (not my exact light, but similar)
Desview R6 monitor: amzn.to/34CfKUI
AmScope ME300TZA-2L Trinocular Metallurgical Microscope: amzn.to/355bIkd
DaVinci Resolve: amzn.to/3gm2fLR
Buy me a cup of earl grey:
Bitcoin: bc1qf5yzmguzxmx7wmal36ancfvqf34ge08juvtnfk
Ethereum: 0x1B2df497F1c3bDa4b952Bd3cE266Ccf9D3d6cc30
Chia: xch1qtmtxej0tz2c82wj45mu5ncsu4s6z7nageec44qmc0p4dqexdv7s4a4rlg
Ravencoin: RKtLSABkqdFHBSL2ntb1pdC3PVEuc8Dt2Q
Raptoreum: RSECAdkYjcrGh7BogBYjXdB3oaThYdyFxA
Id guess that USB power header is for power when sleeping. I think most boards leave usb power on when sleeping, and that would allow this usb3 card to power devices when sleeping. This would also allow the keyboard or mouse to wake the system from sleep
Definitely the reason. The 5V from the PSU's SATA is switched off when entering the S3/S4/S5 state, but the USB 2.0 header pulls power instead from the +5VSB rail, which is always active, allowing peripherals to wake the system, and basic 500mA charging per port.
Also, you can't do a Y-splitter for USB-port power, because leeching power off for something else would screw up the correct functioning of the USB power delivery functions and overcurrent detection for whatever other USB device was plugged into the port. You have to sacrifice the USB port in order to pull power from it like this.
It seems to me that since they are going to take up the USB header anyway, it would have been nice to just have those USB ports on the thing, too.
@@Ts6451 then you have to add another DC:DC power supply and current limit the ports even lower than the 500mA x2 limit that the 2.0 header provides (since you can't multi-tap a USB power supply). And since 500mA is the base power specification for a USB 2.0 host port, that doesn't work since you'd be below the minimum.
The way it was done was 1:1 with each port getting its own 500mA of standby power from its half of the USB 2.0 header, which was the only proper way to do this.
@@slightlyevolved False. The data lines are carried over the SATA Express connection via PCIe, since it's effectively just a USB 3.0 add in card on a different form factor. If they weren't, the USB ports wouldn't function at all.
But because the SATA power IS NOT always on (that shuts off when the system enters S3/S4/S5 power states), the USB 2.0 power which is derived from +5VSB which IS always on, the devices are able to wake the system, since they have both the always on power they need and a data connection to the system over the SATA Express PCIe tunnel.
Wow I still remember vividly when this was the "next big thing" must have been at CES even back at the time but then it disappeared like you said, to the point where I thought I dreamed it or something. Thanks for the video, takes me back!
You don't see much of eSATA anymore either.
@@isthattrue1083 another connector that was barely used. Just hooked up a front panel hub with esata yesterday in fact and thought the same thing
The Thinkpad T460p and T470p actually uses it if configured with NVME SSDs. It uses a caddy in the 2.5in bay, but instead of a ribbon connector, the caddy adapts m.2 to 2 lanes of PCIe over the sata express connector
Same as X260
There's another fairly recent connector standard that simply died before getting its chance to shine, the VirtualLink interface was on certain RTX 20 series cards and even had a planned adapter for the Valve Index before getting cancelled shortly before it was supposed to launch in 2019. If you happen to have a graphics card from that generation still that's what the USB-C connector on the back was for most likely. You can still configure it as a display out with the correct cable but I was particularly burned by its abandonment since I was excited for VR gaming over a single lightweight cable back in 2019.
I know the adapter for the HP G2 headset did come to market. Almost bought one for mine at the time. :P
The AMD 7900 XT and XTX have USB-C ports on them. But I don't think they have anything to do with VirtualLink and are just for DisplayPort tunneling over USB-C.
@@PeterBrockie virtuallink requires power output and its a bit different from the common now usb c mode which probably killed it that nobody was using it. Plus on usb-c only charge laptops you'd have to support magically both at same time or somehow explain to people they can't stick it into it.
One thing that sucks about usb-c is that you can't know what you can get out of it by looking at it.. Or can put into it for that matter. Or with what cable. Or that you can charge through it but only at 30 or 60 watts(on a 300w lappy) or 100 watts but only with specific charger - and on only one of the ports.
Modern laptops are going back to days of having essentially a bunch of db9 ports that you just have to know which is for what, which is kinda dumb.
You can also use it as a standard USB-C port! My motherboard didn't have a USB-C header for my front panel, and I needed to use a USB-C port for some reason. Plugged in whatever device, and it just worked! If I recall correctly it's a whole 10Gbps port, which is honestly awesome.
@@lasskinn474 idk who looks at ports nowadays. People just google it 😂 I think only MacBooks get bricked by third party usb c chargers
I remember Sata Express being introduced with Z97 motherboards alongside M.2. On that generation, both interfaces supported just 2 lanes of pcie 2.0. As soon as the next generation was launched, M.2 got upgraded to PCIe3.0x4. Sata Express was still available in many of the newer boards for a couple generations (which thanks to the backwards compatibility with Sata 3 is not really a problem), but was basically obsolete with no clear upgrade path possible for the standard. At that point, the industry basically gave up on trying to retrofit newer revisions with higher bandwidth and went into the U.2 using the SSF connector that was previously being used for SAS already.
All and all the concept wasn't bad, but the design was too focused on solving the issue of bandwidth limitations on the sort term, with no clear path forward. I doubt I would have succeeded in any other form, as is clear nowadays that U.2 is not very popular in the consumer market either, and M.2 is the more interesting form factor.
Aren't most M.2 on PCIE 4.0 still only 4 lane?
I bought a gigabyte z170x gaming 7 motherboard which also has sata express. Not one but two stacked on top of each other.
@@isthattrue1083 I mean it's 4 lanes at 4.0... which is 1000Mbps vs 64,000Mbps. (~1GB/s vs 64GB/s)
Correction, 8gb for sata express, as you are noting the numbers for m.2 in gigabits, but still 4 or 8 times faster depending on the pcie revision in question.
@@isthattrue1083 If you want x16 speed there are some cards available to plug in that you can install 4 nvme drives into the card. Pair them in raid 0 and you will get close to x16 speeds.
and the whole asrock front panel thing is explained away as: This is great news as we’ll finally be able to get front panel USB 3.1 support as the case makers are waiting for Intel to add USB 3.1 support into their chipset and for a standardized pin header to be ratified before they can add support for front panel USB 3.1. (So they used the sata express port as the pci path to the usb adapter board.)
This was also my idea: it provides a front USB 3 port, which were rare at the time and you might want an extra one. In that case you might not even care about losing a USB 2 header in the process.
Wonder why they didint just make pcie usb3.1 card with usb3.1 ports, and had normal extensions usb cables go from it front panel.
But i assume they did that too lol as there's any kind of usb card imaginable made
@@NuffMan_ It might of been marketing. Its like he said it was the only device he could find that used the port.
+5vsb != +5v. Those are separate lines from the PSU. There are technical reasons for that (as some mentioned usb doesn't shut down with the pc, that's cause it's getting power from the purple standby line). Given that the only connector with +5vsb is the ATX connector and that is plugged in the motherboard the only way to get it (and pass the usb compliance test) is through an usb header from the motherboard. Also, those front panels thingies were in high demands, I actually considered buying one myself! They were just about the only way to get a usb-c port in your pc at that time
There's one reason I could think of for the separate USB power.
Using the USB2.0 header, you get the fused and host-controlled 5V.
Otherwise, you might not be able to get the "Your USB device is drawing too much power" warning in your OS or power-cycle the device through the controller.
Power cycling the device through the controller is really useful. From experience there are devices that cannot be reset via software in some states and being able to shut them down, or fix them on a reboot is the best recovery method. This is especially bad if power isn't interrupted during a reboot as the device can be left in a powered-on state with a driver that expects to bootstrap it.
Also separate power used to comply with USB 2 spec 5v @ 0.5A if memory servers correct if you just used the 5v from the SATA power lines you get more than half amp.
@@SlyerFox666 But this is USB 3.1 and thus has very little to do with USB 2.0 specs. Especially regarding power where USB 3.x varies significantly from USB 2.0.
Overcurrent protection is handled by the USB Root Controller, which is on this device, connected over PCIe using the two PCIe lanes that Sata Express carries.
It's just a PCIe x2 USB controller, like any other but this one uses Sata Express to connect to PCIe instead of all the other cards which skip over Sata Express and just go directly in your PCIe slot.
The only reason for the USB 2.0 power would be to connect to the ATX power supply's +5VSB, which by ATX spec must deliver at least 2A at all time, even when the PC is turned off.
This would be used to (fairly slowly) charge your phone while the PC is off, or power on your pc using a button on your keyboard.
There's no real reason for the +5VSB in this card though, as nobody would buy this fairly expensive device to then plug in a keyboard...
@@someguy4915 Try reading the comment above that I was replying too before going off on a tangent about the video I'm not actually tal!!king about kiddo, an I'm not sure where you got half the speech from but USB over current protection has nothing to do with PCIe it's closed loop control measuring what's being pulled from the supply lines, not data. Probably measured from a very low resistance resistor back to a microcontroller/ processor to turn on or off the USB controller/ supply, which with the USB 2 we were discussing limits the 5v 2A from the standard ATX PSU power rail, as you correctly stated into the 5v 0.5A USB 2 Spec.
@@SlyerFox666 Not sure why you're so hostile, I seem to have hit a sensitive subject for you?...
I never said anything about PCIe related to over current protection, so not sure where you read that but it sure wasn't here so perhaps that's just in your mind bud.
Using a microcontroller and power resistor would work, but wastes a lot of power, takes up a large PCB footprint and costs a lot. What you would usually do is a ~0Ω shunt resistor and then measure the voltage drop over it but this too takes up way too much space for most USB applications.
What most USB root controllers and (powered) hubs do is use a specialized IC for this such as the 'SY6280AAC'.
Then the USB root or hub IC has test pins that measure whether the power switch is active or not, thus detecting an over current situation.
Most USB root controller ICs and USB hub ICs these days (and for the last 15 or so years) include these power switches internally.
You mention separate power is to comply with USB 2.0 spec, but this is a USB 3.1 (or currently USB 3.2 Gen 2) spec card so USB 2.0 has nothing to do with it.
But even ignoring that, whether you get the power from the +5VSB or +5VDC line of the PSU doesn't matter for current limiting as that function is the same regardless.
Not sure why you're being so hostile, it's okay to make mistakes, that's why I corrected yours so you can learn bud.
Never heard of Sata Express but used to use ESATA back in the day before the new USB standards got fast enough for bulk storage but this is neat
That Asrock thing is quite something. I've got two boards that have sata express connectors, they both have two ports, one is an Asus sabertooth z97 and the other is a Gigabyte z170, so it seems it wasn't quite one generation.
Yep. After no one made drives for it and M.2 took off, the need for it died off completely. I mean, at least you can use the port for a 5 Gbps USB-C port... Yay? haha
@@PeterBrockie Annoyingly, the sabertooth board doesn't have M.2, probably because of the sata express, an Asus ROG z97 board I have has m.2 but no sataE (I got the sabertooth for basically free last year with a 4790k) it does have 8 sata ports though, which is somewhat of a consolation.
@@PeterBrockie And now they added NMVe hdd's as well, effectively being sata express anyway. Well datacenter but I think it may come to desktop, as such stuff often does.
Simpler design, just route lanes, no need for extra chips to convert anything.
@@PeterBrockie The Oculus Quest 2 uses a Type C connector to connect to your PC, and cases with a Type C on the front are either expensive, or seem to cost you front USB Type A as a result.
Adding that port, albeit only a single one, could well be a very cool addition for a VR Headset user.
I saw the title and was like omg yes but was sadly let down
I think that describes the entire SATA Express experience. haha
Yeah. I have an x79 sabertooth with that connector. I tried to find some use for it but there was never any devices to take advantage of it. I set my daughter up with that system. Lol. As I recall the 4930k and asus mobo was very expensive when we got it for the nightclub. It ran 12 projectors in resolume quite well with two titan black gpu. What a beast she was new.
I got my 4570 build in 2018, quite a bit late to the h97 game. 'Twas cheap though, cost me a mere $60 for a board, RAM, and power supply. All brand new in box off some guy who bought the stuff back in the day but never got around to assembling it.
I put a period correct GTX 960 into the rig, and ran games on it for a little while until getting my Ryzen system in 2020.
@@mikehall3976 still a bit of a beast now
6:30 The 5v power connector is supposed to come from a floppy disk power connector. The usb adapter was in case you don't have floppy power on your psu loom
you may have an issue of feeding back power if both are connected
It's not a floppy connector, looks more like the analog audio connector used on CD-ROM drives. The consensus from another comment here seems to be that the SATA power connector is used to deliver full current for USB 3.1, but that the USB2 power connector is used to provide power to the ports when the computer is in S3/S4/S5 sleep, as the PSU/Sata power are turned off. In order for devices plugged in to the USB 3 ports to be able to wake the computer from sleep, the adapter needs power from an always on source.
@@johngaltline9933 oh, right, floppy didn't have a latch! thanks John
Wow. Bringing back memories. I actually was waiting and waiting months and months for that to actually get released and finally just gave up and forgot about it. I wanted to add a front mounted USB-C on my build at the time and I found that they were the only ones that made one. Sad I never got it but I’ve moved on lol
SATA Express was also on Z170 boards as well.
Asus also made a device that uses SATA Express called USB 3.1 UPD Panel with two USB-C ports. It is also a front panel device but iside it is an PCI-E card that can be extracted and used in an PCI-E slot , came with a bracket. Selling point was dual 10Gb/s and ip to 100W of power from the port. Advertised on the box are Asus Z170 series motherboarda.
The issue with SATA express on desktop is that in order to use the PCIE lanes, you need a refclk, but the cables are too long to support a stable refclk. The original way to solve this problem was something called SRIS, which would allow the use of a separate refclk on the device side, but a lot of motherboard/device manufactures never added support for SRIS, so there really aren’t any devices that can use the PCIE lanes. The notebooks got around this problem by just supplying the optional refclk signals directly to the drive (since they were mounted directly to the board this was ok). Note that the SATA express connectors on motherboards actually don’t even have pins for the optional refclk, which is why a lot of prototype devices for the standard had extra pins and wires for the clock.
You can buy the Lenovo m.2 to SATA Express adapters. They are used in laptops.
My NAS is a Z97-WS. It will do 1 M.2 and 2xSATA Express. I have 3 Intel 660p 2TB in it. Then a x8 to dual m.2 with opatane for cache, pair of 1650s for nvec, and a 40g controller.
I have a Lenovo T460 laptop with an M.2 NVMe drive using one of those adapters. Gets about 2x SATA speeds.
In the description of the asrock device it states it can supply up to 1a when in sleep hence the 4 pin to usb header, as others have said most mobos support 5v output via usb when in sleep (without d+/d- usb 2 supports 500ma per port=1a)
As for the separate 12v, it’s because the device supports adaptive charging as in the device description, this could mean anywhere between quick charge 2.0/3.0 to usb power delivery 3.0. The board looks like it has power circuitry, it would be good for you to check the usb outputs with a quick charge/power delivery trigger to test? Pd can be 5,9,12,15,20v and the product description states it can output 3a to the usb c port and 5v 3a to the usb on power on state
Also cables are original as per the manual for the device
It really shows to go how poorly supported this connector was that I always thought the little port alone was the SATA express. But it turns out the three ports together are SATA express?? I've never seen that cable before!
Actually a PCIe breakout board would be sick! I still use that Z97 machine as a media server now and I would totally trade 2 SATA ports for an extra PCIe card. Maybe I could move some cards around and find the extra I/O for a SAS controller or something!
For some reason Gigabyte released 2 x370 boards in 2017 (Gaming 5 and Gaming K7) which both had 2 SATA Express ports. As far as I can tell, they are the only boards (that I could find) with SATA Express, M.2, and U.2. I wouldn't be surprised if these are the last 2 boards with SATA Express, but I haven't been able to find anything conclusive either way.
Unlike a lot of the other higher-end x370 boards, these did not have a front panel USB-C connector, so there's probably some person out there who used this device to get front panel USB C on one of these boards.
Asus ROG Maximus extreme Viii also had the same connectors. I have that board lol
Getting a lot of great feedback on this one. So far people have uncovered the following devices which also appear to have come to market:
-Supposedly some drives exist, however I haven't found any evidence on what model numbers, etc. So they might only be in photos.
-A larger 5.25" variant of this device: computerstoreberlin.de/ASUS-USB-31-UDP-Panel-525-SATA-Express-2-x-Gen-2-Typ-C-323348_1
-ASUS Hyper Express - appears to be a SATA RAID controller: www.ebay.com/itm/124701289694
-Generic U.2/SATA Express to M.2/MiniPCIe board (I'm not 100% sure if SATA Express is a mistake though): www.amazon.com/SATA-Express-M-Key-mSATA-Adapter/dp/B07DPRWH1S
Also it seems it was put on a few z170 boards and even a couple x370.
Toshiba XG3 series had SATA Express variants, I think. Example model no. THNSF5256GCJ7.
DeLock 62786. The manufacturer's page for it contains usage examples that suggest other compatible delock products including the DeLock 84767 SATAe cable. The DeLock 89458 pcie card + 84819 cable (both passive) will probably allow you to use pcie 3, maybe 4.
I actually have the ASUS Hyper Express! It worked. Pretty much useless, it only accepts M.2 drives in SATA mode, so you might as well just plug in regular SATA drives to the motherboard directly. But it does work and it was sold.
Well, that is just another connection type (a weird one). Not more and not less. There are front panels and adapters and internal racks to mount drives with that form factor cable.
Don't miss the little sister eSATA and her hunchbacked brother "eSATAp" with power connectors ( An illness under us DVB/TV-Box owners, hehehe )
... oh and a plethora of stuff, nobody wants, on ebay:) Anyway, excuse the casual tone of my comment, Peter. Thanks for the video. It was an entertaining and informative watch!:) subscribed!
You have a great voice 🎙
The AsRock USB-Hub is NOT the only product!
Asus had a USB 5.25 Bay hub too, it had 2 USB-A 3.1 ports instead!
Asus also has their "Hyper Express" as a RAID controller for something.
Z170 also had these, I've got one (don't use it but do have it)
I had a Asus x99 board with SATA Express and eSATA ports and I could never find a drive that used them. Thanks for solving a mystery
Really wish adapters were made for this to use PCIe or M.2 devices with these ports. Would be incredibly useful on mini ITX boards.
There are, Lenovo part 01HY319
@@milescarter7803 well damn, this is going directly in my server machine!
My Z170 ASRock board came with that USB front panel thing and it's really useful for me. I have a portable USB-C SSD and want a 10gbps USB link. Since there wasn't an internal/front panel USB-C standard back then, my case just had 2.0 and 3.0 that point up into the bottom of my desk. And it's a pain to try to reach the rear Type C on the motherboard.
My Asrock Z170 came with it as well, and it seemed to be one of the primary selling points of the Extreme 7+. The "plus" in this case was the addition of this SataExpress to USB/C board. For those who didnt need 6 sata hard drives and 2 optical drives, you could sacrifice a bunch of sata lanes for it.
There is an Lenovo adapter used in some 7gen notebooks (T470p) that converts SATA Express to NVMe. The model number is 01HY319. So there must be some chipset that supports SATA Express for 7gen CPUs.
This! T460p also has SATA Express, i own several with the adapter + M.2 NVMe combo installed. There is also a very small list of native SATA Express SSDs, all were Toshiba I think...
I have a Lenovo X260 with said caddy for an M.2 drive. At least a little better than regular SATA. But good luck finding the caddy nowadays…
@@wochenweise I have an X260 too. But sadly I don't have that caddy. Do you maybe have the part number of it?
@@drcyb3r With the part number from above (01HY319) you can find it. If you have a regular SATA-Drive as of now, you will need the SATA-Express-cable to replace the internal SATA-cable. The part number for that is 01AW445. One downside is, that this only gives you a x2-PCI-Express Interface, as SATA Express was only specified for two lanes. So don't bother to get an extra fancy and fast SSD. Average SSDs are more than capable to use 100% of the bandwidth. The installation of that cable requires the laptop to be opened as shown here: ruclips.net/video/Qbh5jOhNjyU/видео.html
Do that, install an NVME-M.2-SSD in the caddy, swap with the fatory caddy and confige the BIOS for AHCI, if not done already. You will likely have to install the OS from scratch anyway. Would be a good time to enable TPM and Secure Boot while at it. With little modification you can then run even Win11 on that somewhat older machine.
I am still rocking the x99 platform while typing this comment. All i can say is this chipset was way ahead of its time. I can confirm that the additional power is to charge stuff after you have shut your PC down. it comes in handy when using wireless headsets, mouse, keyboard, etc.
Yeah, I do like X99 and X299. The X99 board in the video is a sweet Asus workstation board with IPMI.
Scsi to sata express adapters do exist as well as SAS serial attached scsi adapters as well. So sata express ports could be used from scsi or SAS drives.
I have this exact Front USB 3.1 Panel still unopened in the static bag. It came with the ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ motherboard.
Theres an external dual M.2 mSATA enclosure with SATA Express from Asus called Hyper Express.
One shop still sells it on ebay.
There is even one with dual m.2 and dual m-sata
This standard has the vibe of that one person in college that just copies a bunch of stuff from other people and smashes it together into their own project
The only object that looks alike Sata Express, can be found on external mechanical sata case drives. But, the only thing i can think off, they dropped Sata Express and replaced it with usb 3.0. From Usb 3.0 you have a converter to Sata Express, it draws the power from Usb 3.0 and data transfer also goes over Usb 3.0. So it's a win-win situation. There is a picture on Aliexpress, but i can't show the link.
I have one of those bays, it was included with my Asrock Z170 Extreme 7+. Never installed it, but I might actually use it when I'll leave my current PC to my mom to get more front ports.
Me too, except mine is from a Z170 Extreme4+.
I installed one of those in a PC build. At the time, USB 3.1 wasn't on most motherboards yet, so it wasn't worthless if you wanted to test USB 3.1 device performance. I was doing this for a writer who had been covering the personal computer field since the early 80s but but wasn't inclined to do as much of the build work as he got older. This was enjoyable as I got to play with a lot of stuff without footing the bill.
There also exists the Asus Hyper Express. It is an enclosure which lets you put two M.2 SATA or mSATA drives in RAID.
Great video! I had already seen motherboards with this connection in photos and videos, but I never had the opportunity to have physical contact with one that had this SATA Express connection. Definitely this board from ASRock is also different from any other type of board that allows you to add USB 3.1 ports that I have seen. Greetings from Brazil
If I remember correctly the PCIe Lanes in S-ATA Express don't have the clock generator that would be needed to be a compliant PCIe device...
You could in theory give it a standalone RTC chip (which that ASUS prototype probably would have needed) in order to make it PCIe sort of.
Clock != Time
Its a crucial signal for pcie (and "most" digital logic)
I still have a Gigabyte GA-Z97X Wifi Gaming Black and 4790K. It has this port (advertised as “SATA Express support for 10 Gb/s data transfer”) but I had no idea it died and never happened 😂 thanks for the tip!
yep me too wondering what it was for now I know
i still have a GA-Z97N wifi board still working got a 4670 I5 cpu, i think its the last year for this build cant keep up with games.. starting to top out the CPU much less cant find CPUs that fit the board any more e-bay here i come for replacement cpu's i guess...
oh i used mine for software defined radio
It clearly shows on how SATA Express was a blind alley. On the other hand I've never expected m.2 to evolve in such a useful thing.
When I was looking for something that used the sata express, I did find a few hard drives. They were ungodly expensive from companies that only sold enterprise level parts.
I have an ASUS Z170i Mini-ITX board from 2015 with one of these connectors on - taking up valuable PCB real-estate! It's definitely from that cross-over point in tech, as it also has an NVME M.2 slot which is much more useful.
Admitedly, my ears did prick up when I heard PCI express - a breakout board or a riser for even PCIe 2.0 x 2 offers extra expansion for a SFF board. But no.
When I was 13 I had a Z87 motherboard that had this connector, I didn’t knew what was it before years after!
When I saw this video I was hopping to find something else that used that connector. I have one of the "ASRock front USB 3.1 Panel" new in the box and the cables you have are what came in the box. Their was also a manual and Driver CD. The manual is a small single piece of paper folded up. It didn't have info on why both power cables are needed. I got it for a build because I wanted the USB 3.1 A and C port on the front and cases at the time didn't have options for that. Ended up swapping the case I planned to use with a friend and what I ended up building in didn't have room for it. I kept it thinking I could find something to put it in but never saw another board with that connector.
"this is what the cable looks like"
wait what? I thought it will be only the tiny short portion... no wonder it DIED.
Both of these ports are actually 10Gbit/SuperSpeed+/USB 3.2 Gen. 2 so it's actually maxing out the PCIe 3.0x2 connection.
M.2 and nvme directly on the PCI express bus superceded this tech round the same time. It removed the necessity for a faster SATA port.
I had this front Expansion bay - when I built my PC using it years ago it was awesome having front type-c USB. I flexed on all my friends, and stole all their women once they saw my serial elliptical superiority. Man those were the days...Also I literally just threw this thing in the trash two days ago finally when cleaning out an old parts box. The women left long ago, but the useless SATA Express Expansion Bay was always waiting for me like a silent sentinel...good times. RIP SATA Express, gone before we ever wanted you.
you made me remember e-sata. Remember those?
You know what's wild? I had an Z170 that had three SATA Express headers
I was just about to buy a cheap U.2 drive and one of those cables from eBay for my Z170 system, so this video came out just in time!
I have an X99 board and have been wanting a USB C up front. I'm the one person who wants this product lol
I remember having a eSATA port on my HP laptop back in like 2010. Was pretty cool when USB was slow. Now it would seem kinda pointless.
There are plenty of slots and cables that arent used or had really few products made.
Something that comes to mind are:
AMR slot for modem/audio cards on boards around 2000-2005
3.5"NVME ssd's with their weird cables that plug into m.2 slot (still used in servers but went out quickly on consumer stuff)
AGP PRO agpx4 slot with more power connectors.
There are also plenty of propietary stuff like Asus smartcard header or creative front panel header.
I have Asus A7V333 board with AMR, AGP pro, Smartcard and creative frontpanel capabilities.. like half of the boards functions cannot be used as there isnt anything to plug into ;D
"How many did they sell?"
Asrock: SOMEONE IS MAKING A RUclips VIDEO ABOUT OUR FIRST SALE!
Looks like that ASRock USB 3.1 thing actually have power pins from the SATA power connected as well when looking at the traces on the PCB. With that I'd guess it could take power from either one. It's u to you to choose which one to power it with.
or the usb power is for standby and if you charge your phonw from it it draws from the sata port
@@Rainbow__cookie There's a thread on it here but seems the consensus is, the SATA power is used for normal operation and power delivery for the USB 3.1 ports, but the 2.0 power is used to allow devices plugged in to the 3.1 ports to have power to wake the computer from sleep. The sata has no power when the computer is sleeping but the USB 2 does, with limited current available.
I recall having this connector on my Z97 Sabertooth mark1 board and wondering what it was for. Now I know :) Thanks!
yep me too
I was typing "I wonder if you can make u.2 drives work" right as you got to that. Ah well.
I had this when I upgraded to the i7 6700K at the dawn of USB-C. Good times and memories
There's two ultra slim hybrid 500gb sata express harddrives on ebay right now. They're 3/16in thick.
This is one of many weird things that manufacturers make so decades later, groups of IT persons can play the Equipment Charades game.
ESATA was another interface that never really took off, even though it was on some boards, and even a few cases I think.
What a throwback. I had this connector on my first computer build with i7-7700k on an it’s gigabyte board. For an IT export that would’ve been super useful to add connectors, or an extra PCI express device.
You can find an SATA express enclosure for that.. Inside its possible to put 1 or 2 M.2 Sata drives
My PC, that I still use, because I built it myself, is an MSI X99A SLI board and the documentation states, that it has 1 SATA Express port, but I didn't notice it, when I built it.
And hot swapping. If I REMEMBER correct. It was a way to power to the ESATA drive.
The mind boggling part of this adapter is that it takes all this space… to give up two ports, TWO
There was an SSD for this: ASUS Hyper Express SSD. One of our tech magazines tested it in development in mid 2014, and it used 2 128 GB mini mSata modules for a 256 GB drive. It was advertised as a 2 lane PCIe 3.0 interface that used 4% more power for 160% more throughput. In Theory. In reality, since it was connected to the PCH controller instead of directly accessing the CPU PCIe HUB it was limited to PCIe 2.0 lanes, and that directly halved it's throughput to 1 GB/s. The big bonus was the NVMe support on the drives. To make matters worse the cable used a standard SATA power cable too, as it was the only connector on the drive. So it was an Y shape. During testing it was found, that it was only on par with the SATA 6 GB/s drives in terms of read and write speeds.
Link to the article in HUNGARIAN. Please use Google translator to get an idea about the contents:
ipon.hu/magazin/cikk/kiprobaltuk-az-asus-sata-express-alapu-ssd-jet
Thank you for this video. I think the motherboard manufacturers custom made some of the boards for a specific device. But when the boards were replaced they have reached the general consumer, where we dont know what it is for!
Laptops used this feature even more than you'd think.
I'm currently looking at a WiFi data card. Similar to how nvme x4 pci-e works.
I worked at 2 datacenters from 2013 to 2021. This is the first time I've ever heard of SATA Express 🤔
That said, on looking up the standard, it looks like it's just a way to use PCI-E signaling via SATA cables. I have seen FPGA PCI-E cards that also had a USB 2 cable that went from the Motherboard USB A to the card's USB B.
No idea what the USB did. (Wasn't power, those machines didn't have USB power on standby)
I had a Gigabyte GA-Z270-HD3 with SATA Express. Long after X99 and Z97.
As someone with many USB 3.0 and above USB HDDs and USB sticks, I can see this being quite useful. Most of the PC Cases with DVD drive slots on the front only tend to come with 2 USB 2.0 (Maybe 1 USB 2.0 and 1 USB 3.0 if you're lucky) and even the case I use NOW on a 7th gen build doesn't have a USB C on the front.
It looks like the purpose of that product was to add the newer 3.1 or Type C ports to an older case that doesn't have them, via using a DVD drive slot (lets face it, DVDs are rarely used unless you're a retro games fan)
Heck, if I still had a DVD drive slot, I'd buy that off you. I want a USB C on the front of my case, especially as VR Headsets such as the Quest 2 use USB C for charging and use on a PC - and I can very much imagine running out of length, or snapping a connector, if plugged into the back of a PC. Adding that USB Type C to the front of the case has massive appeal, at least to me, with the USB 3.1 being a nice bonus.
Thanks ASRock. I could've just bought a PCIE x4 card to get two USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 ports, but sure, I'll use up two entire SATA ports, plus a SATA power connector, plus a whole five and a quarter inch drive bay. Excellent.
I just ran into this trying to use my old Asrock Taichi X470 board for TrueNas. The connector doesn’t look exactly like this, but I discovered that 6 of my 8 SATA ports wouldn’t detect any drives in TrueNas Core. I quickly found with dmesg that truenas was seeing two different controllers, and then I found that the Asrock BIOS has a bunch of SataExpress settings. Appears that only 2 of my 8 SATA ports were regular SATA, the rest are some variant of SataExpress.
RIP to my NAS project
NVME drives are just faster all around, so by the time anyone would show interest in SATA Express, it had already been eclipsed by M.2.
I wonder if over time we'll see motherboards with as few as a single PCIe x16 slot and many M.2 slots.
The mobo I just got came with 3 M.2 slots on the board, with one of them being PCIe 4.0 and others being PCIe 3.0.
It also included an adapter card that provides 2x M.2 at PCIe 4.0 or 1x M.2 at PCIe 5.0 depending on what slot on the board you plug it into.
SATA is basically obsolete now, but will likely be included for years to come because of all the drives that were made for it.
U.2 uses different pins for NVMe vs SAS/SATA
U.3 uses the same pins for both and there are some sense pins that signal NVMe.
Both used fairly heavily in the Server world for the last few generations, even more so in latest Xeon/Epyc v4
But also taking hold in that space is now EDSFF.
in college I plugged a device in a eSata port of a friend's computer and we were both baffled that it worked - I didnt even know it was eSata I thought it was just a regular USB
My friend had one of those and I never knew what to tell him. Glad I finally found out, thanks
I was so excited to have this future connector on my z97 mobo. Tbh, I always thought PCIe should have a standard that goes through a cable rather than devices only mounted directly on the mobo.
That original thunderbolt that used the mini DP wasn't around long
I'm pretty sure every Z170 board came with SATA express ports too. My Gigabyte Z170 board has 3 SATA express ports and no regular SATA ports. I knew at the time that it was useless, but hey you could still use them as regular SATA ports.
The problem has that the first real NVMe SSDs were already faster than the 2 GB/s x2 PCIe link could support. The fact that the people in the industry obviously knew that M.2 and U.2 would come and what a NVMe SSD could do lead to an very limited use on mainboards. There were no SATAe SSDs ever released. Only SATAe to M.2 SATA or mSATA adapters made it to the market and that front panel which came with Asrock Z170 Extreme+ and K6+ boards. The USB 2.0 power is probably for 5V standby power. It uses 2 ports for 1 amp on standby on that USB-C I guess.
I still use my Z97 motherboard with a 4790K. Just been unable to afford an uppgrade to something newer. These days it seems crazy to buy anything with the current inflation. My system still runs fine with 32 GB DDR3 and 1 TB m.2 drive with Windows 10. Theres still a few years of support left for that so what the heck. I never felt the need to look for anything to connect to the SATA Expres port also it dont work with and m.2 nvme device installed.
Yeah the break out board from sata-e to pci-e was a prototype shown a CES that never made it to market. I remember seeing it and remembering how cool it would be to use.
I believe the sata express protocol worked over m.2 before NVME took off.
eSATA comes to mind too
They should have just made a SATA IV port that was the same shape and twice as fast. Maybe then SSD drives could have kept up. Now it's nvme or bust, but you have to plug those on the board, and it's usually limited to 2-3, whereas SATA had 6 and 8 ports regularly.
My motherboard has 4xSATA III and U.2 which I use with a U.2 to 4xSATA III cable and the U.2 can be configured in bios to drive 4 SAS or 4 SATA, but mode has to be changed from nvme default.
I don't know why U.2 never took off on the consumer side. It could have given SSD's nvme speeds. Have 4 U.2 ports available. Maybe it uses too many pcie lanes?
Sort of related but I have an ESI ESP1010e PCIe X1 soundcard that appears to send some sort of PCI Express over a HDMI cable, I believe it used a somewhat special HDMI lead (shield separate to ground?).
Had a very lightly populated PCIe X1 card that linked to a 19" rack that had all the hardware inside it, there was a previous version with a PCI card and 25 way d-sub link cable where it looks like the sound chip was on the PCI card and there were other manufacturers that had similar products, but this definitely had all the hardware in the rack.
The ESI website shows both models and you can see the huge difference between the 1010's PCI card and the 1010e's PCIe card.
I still use a Z97 board for a home server and that connector always stares at me and I'm like WHAT ARE YOU.
The cable isnt useless. You need a Drive that supports SAS Protocol AND the SATA Subset. Usually SAS Drives doesnt support the SATA Protocol. SAS Drives usually dont spin up on SATA Controller.
Good example on the launch version of the PS Vita it had an expansion port but Sony never produced anything nor did any 3rd party company make anything for it ever. The port was taken out on the 2nd gen Vita
Huh... wasn't aware this ever existed. I had one mobo that had an eSATA connector, but it was different. Only thing I ever had that used it was an external hard drive dock.
ASUS boards have always been feature rich. They don't pick sides, and tend to support everything under the sun. That's why I've used them since the 90's.
That chip is ASM1141 which is a standard PCI-E USB controller.
Of all the prototype devices made for SATA Express, the only thing which went through the marketing department without being scrapped was this junky USB front header...
ah finally something to plug into that old x99 thats still going
I remember helping a friend assemble a board with this connector, the only thing I could plug into it was the cable that came with the motherboard.
When you buy your PCI-E device on Wish.
I have a Z97 board. I just used The SATA Express port as 2 SATA ports. Definitely more useful than that front panel.