Vortex Optics Triumph HD 10x42 Binocular Overview / Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2023
  • I picked up the ‪@VortexOpticsUSA‬ Triumph HD 10x42 several weeks ago at a local big box retailer because I was intrigued in the $99.99 price point and how Vortex claimed it was putting out good performance. In summary, it is surprisingly not bad. Watch the video or read more at www.ocabj.net/vortex-optics-t...
    If you are interested in getting a set of the Triumph HD 10x42, consider getting it under my affiliate link on Amazon - amzn.to/48d5O0j

Комментарии • 34

  • @ocabj
    @ocabj   +30

    FYI: After I published my video and article, I sent in the Triumph HD to Vortex to address the clicking/chattering focus knob and they sent me a brand new Triumph HD which does not have the issue.

  • @MountainAjar

    You rocked. Everything I needed to know in a focused detailed amount of film time.

  • @patricj951

    I just got Bantam 6,5x32 and for the price they are great. Triumph have very similar design, especially the eyecups. I think Triumph is to consider a big brother to Bantam.

  • @awrenn
    @awrenn  +1

    I picked up a pair today and they did NOT have the focus chatter.

  • @eddiekytia

    What tripod mount is that your useing? I think I like it

  • @littlebitofeverything652

    For someone that hikes hunts , LIGHT is what we want

  • @L.V-Rider

    I bought one today and I am satisfied with the quality and image. No, it is not the same quality as the Swarovski NL Pure 10x42 that I also had in my hands in the store, but then, the Vortex does not cost more than $3000 as the Swarovski. Light weight so it must be cheep? It is the same weight and about same form / size as the Swarovski, so the Swarovski must also be cheap. ???

  • @JaimeDiaz-kw1ru

    How are the vortex' viper HDs? Would you recommend them?

  • @clone1137

    I can’t find ANYTHING explaining the difference between the triumph and crossfire lines. I’m deciding between the vortex crossfire 10x42 and vortex triumph 10x42 (there’s about a 50 dollar price difference and I can’t for the life of me discern why). Anyone familiar?

  • @daniellewis9240

    So you’d say they are on par with other $400-$500 pairs that you have tried?

  • @Womfat
    @Womfat  +5

    The level of optic you can buy for entry-level price these days just keeps going up. I would have picked up a pair of these for my wife to use, but we found her a used Diamondback HD 10x42 instead for around the same price!

  • @commonsense5709

    Great review appreciate the effort. Curious as to why but a cheap liw end binoculars when you already iwn the Viper HD amd Swarovski NL Pure?

  • @DominikChmiel-mp8ch

    Warto kupić produkt na obserwację do lasu poszukiwanie zrzuty Jelenia?

  • @vikinona

    Hello. Interesting video. I have a Swarovski EL 10x42 Swarovizion and also a Bushnell Nitro 10x36, which is in the center of the picture, which is sharper than the EL. Now I'm thinking about Vortex Razor HD 10x42 and that will definitely be even sharper than Bushnell Nitro and also from EL..

  • @Joshkayla8487

    The Swarovski are also alot more money to

  • @samdequina3386

    First time binoculars buyer what would you recommend under around $120 mark. Not looking to spend more than that ? You had me sold on not buying these

  • @patricktarango1059

    I don’t think the nl pures are much better than the uhd from vortex

  • @carloscm255

    Claro que si!! Tu lógica es la siguiente:

  • @alj.granda8252

    Cheap Chinese made! There's a reason Vortex Vipers HDs are $500! I love mine and the best binos at that price. Save your money and buy the best binos you can! Vortex should never have released see binos.