Click baited again! You didn't bring up any real new problems. There weren't supposed to be any more Starship launched this year, and having a launch next week would have been a real bonus. Considering this launch will have an upgraded prototype design it was really surprising that channels were putting out that they would launch in December instead of January as originally indicated.
I am really curious to see if they catch the starship with the booster still on the OLM. How will the booster handle a rocket landing in very close proximity without getting buffeted by the engine exhaust. Seems risky to me.
@@wildlyoptimistic1352 booster will likely be moved before catch, it will likely take multiple orbits til the ship is in position to be able to deorbit and return
Methane and O² delivery: it seems to me that an offshore commodities transfer bouy that would allow a small ship or barge to hookup and transfer a much larger delivery of propellants than can travel by road would expedite keeping the tanks topped off.
Good Morning, Kev. You know that SpaceX will use this time to make sure that the next flight will be a close to perfect as you can get. Thanks for the update on the tank farm. Haven't heard much about the tank farm lately. The year is closing quickly. BO has a good history of delays. Delays, Delays, Delays. The hot fire test? I don't think they have much confidence in 1 BE-4 engine test. To say nothing about 7 BE-4 engines. If the BE-4 engine is so great. How come they didn't totally go with throttle up on the ULA rocket. It could have overpowered the faulty booster rocket motor. If they do a test on the 7 BE-4 rockets. I want to see a cameras on this rocket. But don't to close. Blue Ghost will be interesting. I hope that good smoothly. Great Update, Kev. Have a Great Day.
Spacex is still well above and beyond what anybody else is doing ! Even no flight 7 till January most likely the workforce will be off for the upcoming holidays !
Good reporting. I like it that you got a human narrator. And there seems to be a real human touch in the writing. It's funny how many parasite channels pop up using AI narration and writing and it's not fair to the viewers or to channels like Great SpaceX. Hang in there! One note: deluge is pronounced "dell yuge" not "de-luge." Get that right and you'll be 10,000x better than any AI narrator. They get all kinds of stuff wrong. You, just one or two little errors for the whole 11 minutes. Pretty good!
on the subject of BO's "delays" there are 2 or 3 parameters that may have been forgotten by observers we almost always compare the results of SpaceX and BO so -1- what are the weekly schedules for both if it's ~40 hours/week for BO and more than 80 hours/week for SpaceX (it will take BO twice as many weeks to do the same thing) -2- the staff of both are obviously competent but if SpaceX has attracted ALL the super geniuses, there are only good ones left for BO, also competent but less exceptional -3- in a parallel universe without Elon Musk or SpaceX (hard to imagine) would the BO adventure also seem slow? the contrast between the two is painful! maybe because SpaceX is still in "Super Saiyan III or IV or V" mode
A lot of words just to say "This is supposition about no launch this year" sorta seems like filler otherwise. Which tells me not much news but I need a video to post. have a nice day
Why do you constantly rehash the same stuff over and over again. Just present the new info, repeating the same things over and over again to extend the video length makes it not worth while watching!
This Has Been Known For Over a Month. Scraping the Bottom Of The Barrel For Stories Just To Post Is Tantamount To Clickbait! Up Your Game Or I Will Soon Be Unsubscribing.
Blue Origin just needs to give up already. I think that NASA needs to change their whole mission as well. They should just sell all their stuff to SpaceX, team up with them and stop spending _our_ tax dollars on stuff like the SLS. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely *love* NASA and they'll always have a special place in my heart but unfortunately, they're just starting to become obsolete.
Have to start giving you thumbs down get a start affecting this algorithm. Y’all have way too much click bait and way too much over wording exaggerating like my high school child trying to write an essay.
What I wonder about is the rapid fuel consumption just to clear the tower. It seems like they use around 20% of the total booster fuel load just to clear the tower. If they were able (strcturally difficult) to use SRB's, they would be able to get the booster much higher/faster with the fuel.
@@ignitedreign8584there will be different versions of starship. Moon lander won't return to earth under current plans with using Artemis. That could change latter.
Where in the held 95 Danian come from someone's got to be smoking something to come up with that number that is bad it's ridiculous and irresponsible as convenient it's amazing how people make things up but you always got some Space Cadet that just got to stir the pot speaking of pot that must be what some of these people smoke when they come up with these statements
@@jackdbur SpaceX got handed 20 billion from the Federal Gov at its start because of its massive yearly loses. And its investors like Bank of America took 118 billion in federal funds through TARP. And SpaceX got another 4 billion in federal handout for Artemis. They were supposed to land on the Moon in a few months... Starbase alone cost over 3 billion. In 2023 the Starship development already blew the 5 billion budget. And its total R&D cost today is over 20 billion and its only 10% completed... At this pace finishing it for under 100 billion would take a miracle. Sources PayloadResearch & SpaceX.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Click baited again! You didn't bring up any real new problems. There weren't supposed to be any more Starship launched this year, and having a launch next week would have been a real bonus. Considering this launch will have an upgraded prototype design it was really surprising that channels were putting out that they would launch in December instead of January as originally indicated.
That is why i unsubscribed, got tired of clickbait misinformation.
At least he's not as bad as WhatAboutIt. (WAI) Those guys are the absolute _worst._
@@rayro999 Haha! He "liked" your comment. 😆
As always this guy does nothing but create a story that doesn't exist melodrama it's really annoying I think The problem he's referring to is himself
Which two aerospace giants are you referring to, SpaceX with it's hundreds of orbital launches, and BO with it's 00s of orbital launches?
SPACEX needs to do a FULL ORBIT and CATCH BOTH BOOSTER AND STARSHIP!
Flight 9, hopefully
Elon said if flight 7 goes well flight 8 will be a ship catch attempt
SPACE MEXICO!!! ARRIBA AARIBAA!!! HEEEEHAAAA!!
I am really curious to see if they catch the starship with the booster still on the OLM. How will the booster handle a rocket landing in very close proximity without getting buffeted by the engine exhaust. Seems risky to me.
@@wildlyoptimistic1352 booster will likely be moved before catch, it will likely take multiple orbits til the ship is in position to be able to deorbit and return
Methane and O² delivery: it seems to me that an offshore commodities transfer bouy that would allow a small ship or barge to hookup and transfer a much larger delivery of propellants than can travel by road would expedite keeping the tanks topped off.
Good Morning, Kev. You know that SpaceX will use this time to make sure that the next flight will be a close to perfect as you can get. Thanks for the update on the tank farm. Haven't heard much about the tank farm lately. The year is closing quickly. BO has a good history of delays. Delays, Delays, Delays. The hot fire test? I don't think they have much confidence in 1 BE-4 engine test. To say nothing about 7 BE-4 engines. If the BE-4 engine is so great. How come they didn't totally go with throttle up on the ULA rocket. It could have overpowered the faulty booster rocket motor. If they do a test on the 7 BE-4 rockets. I want to see a cameras on this rocket. But don't to close. Blue Ghost will be interesting. I hope that good smoothly. Great Update, Kev. Have a Great Day.
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
Have a nice day☺️
It was never expected to launch this month to begin with? Its been known for weeks that they are aiming for January 11, 2025
Yeah
The Flight 7 Starship Launch Date Will Be Possibly On Christmas Eve, It Be A Nice Christmas Present For Humanity.
Any info on the moving of SpaceX Control from Hawthorn Ca, to the Star Base in Tx?
Yeah, we will discuss this in the upcoming episode
Great video Kevin 👍
No earlier than 11 Jan, 2025 launch date has been official for weeks - why would the announcer expect a 2024 launch?
We knew for some time flight 7 wouldnt happen this year..Some down time over Xmas has been more than earned...
Spacex is still well above and beyond what anybody else is doing ! Even no flight 7 till January most likely the workforce will be off for the upcoming holidays !
Agree
God bless SpaceX and guide Great SpaceX 2025 a better year with success abundance and amazing achievement. Amen 🎉🎉
🙏 Let's hope so!
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
Good reporting. I like it that you got a human narrator. And there seems to be a real human touch in the writing. It's funny how many parasite channels pop up using AI narration and writing and it's not fair to the viewers or to channels like Great SpaceX. Hang in there!
One note: deluge is pronounced "dell yuge" not "de-luge." Get that right and you'll be 10,000x better than any AI narrator. They get all kinds of stuff wrong. You, just one or two little errors for the whole 11 minutes. Pretty good!
Thanks for your comment. We are real human and always try harder to make better video for everyone, so keep following and discussing on our channel
Perhaps there is a new design for the booster grid fins and they may decide to use the new design.
Hopefully, nothing will go wrong
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
One more launch this month would have been sweet, front row seat and popcorn still on the ready!
Sadly, this expectation is so small
Yes, we will try to give you a gift for the New Year and launch Glen. Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
For the OLM, SpaceX should install the ceramic heat shield tiles around its legs and other surfaces that they intend to "paint".
Great suggestion
No more flights this year? Oh my. Around 10 days until next year, can we hold out?????? Will the world stop spinning? Come on!!
You are so optimistic
on the subject of BO's "delays" there are 2 or 3 parameters that may have been forgotten by observers
we almost always compare the results of SpaceX and BO so
-1- what are the weekly schedules for both
if it's ~40 hours/week for BO and more than 80 hours/week for SpaceX (it will take BO twice as many weeks to do the same thing)
-2- the staff of both are obviously competent but if SpaceX has attracted ALL the super geniuses, there are only good ones left for BO, also competent but less exceptional
-3- in a parallel universe without Elon Musk or SpaceX (hard to imagine) would the BO adventure also seem slow? the contrast between the two is painful! maybe because SpaceX is still in "Super Saiyan III or IV or V" mode
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
A lot of words just to say "This is supposition about no launch this year" sorta seems like filler otherwise. Which tells me not much news but I need a video to post. have a nice day
Are they ever going to put Chopsticks on the second tower?
The chopsticks is coming soon
They haven't put any catch hardware on Starship yet, I think SpaceX is considering catching it in a net instead of using tower arms. 🙃
Why do you constantly rehash the same stuff over and over again. Just present the new info, repeating the same things over and over again to extend the video length makes it not worth while watching!
SPACE MEXICO!!! ARRIBA AARIBAA!!! HEEEEHAAAA!!
the new glen stand looks like the basic framing of a second ship
Yeah yeah
This Has Been Known For Over a Month.
Scraping the Bottom Of The Barrel For Stories Just To Post Is Tantamount To Clickbait! Up Your Game Or I Will Soon Be Unsubscribing.
Its not blue origen it dead origen and dead glenn
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
Is this voice AI?
Blue doesn't have working engines and no money to develop a new one ~ that's a big problem
Yeah
😔
Get ready for the upcoming year
Blue Origin just needs to give up already. I think that NASA needs to change their whole mission as well. They should just sell all their stuff to SpaceX, team up with them and stop spending _our_ tax dollars on stuff like the SLS. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely *love* NASA and they'll always have a special place in my heart but unfortunately, they're just starting to become obsolete.
Have to start giving you thumbs down get a start affecting this algorithm. Y’all have way too much click bait and way too much over wording exaggerating like my high school child trying to write an essay.
I'm still waiting
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
Me too
How long will it take to reach the moon
You mean Starship or New Glenn?
@@colonbina1 The payload that they deployed to the moon
What I wonder about is the rapid fuel consumption just to clear the tower. It seems like they use around 20% of the total booster fuel load just to clear the tower. If they were able (strcturally difficult) to use SRB's, they would be able to get the booster much higher/faster with the fuel.
Somebody watching?😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
Yes, we will try to give you a gift for the New Year and launch Glen. Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
Thanks for the support. Sincerely, Jeff Bezos.
i am still waiting for an accessible, fast, reliable and cheap Starlink internet
U greedy bastard 😂
Me too
Why is Starship having to be caught. If it goes to the moon or mars it will need landing gear
For when it comes back, theoretically they’ll catch both immediately restock refuel and relaunch
@@ignitedreign8584there will be different versions of starship. Moon lander won't return to earth under current plans with using Artemis. That could change latter.
I love Starship with landing legs
Starship development cost is quickly approaching 95 billion over budget. Very efficient.
Where in the held 95 Danian come from someone's got to be smoking something to come up with that number that is bad it's ridiculous and irresponsible as convenient it's amazing how people make things up but you always got some Space Cadet that just got to stir the pot speaking of pot that must be what some of these people smoke when they come up with these statements
The whole project including starbase is supposed to be running right about 5 billion.
And anyway it is mostly privately funded
@@jackdbur SpaceX got handed 20 billion from the Federal Gov at its start because of its massive yearly loses. And its investors like Bank of America took 118 billion in federal funds through TARP. And SpaceX got another 4 billion in federal handout for Artemis. They were supposed to land on the Moon in a few months... Starbase alone cost over 3 billion. In 2023 the Starship development already blew the 5 billion budget. And its total R&D cost today is over 20 billion and its only 10% completed... At this pace finishing it for under 100 billion would take a miracle. Sources PayloadResearch & SpaceX.
@@gary-pietz4147 It comes from PayloadResearch and SpaceX. What is your source that Starship is under budget ?
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
Super cool. Have a nice day☺️
First
Have a good day!!!!❤️
I'm still waiting
Okey
I’m still waiting
Yeah